Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.830
Filter
1.
J Med Vasc ; 49(2): 65-71, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697712

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Despite the effort to increase the proportion of patients starting dialysis on native accesses, many of them are still dialyzed on tunnelled catheter. Catheter-related complications are often serious and responsible for re-hospital admission, high morbidity and mortality. Several multicenter trials have reported results in the use of tunnelled dialysis catheter (TDC). However, few single-center studies have been published to verify the outcome from real-world experience. This study presents our center's experience in managing such patients in the context of relevant literature. METHODS: Demographics and operative data were retrospectively collected from medical charts. A prospective follow-up was performed to investigate complications, number of re-hospitalizations and mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to evaluate catheter primary patency and patients' overall survival. RESULTS: Among a total 298 haemodialysis accesses interventions, 105 patients (56 men, 53.3% and 49 women, 46.7%) with a median age of 65 years (range 32-88 years) were included in the study. All insertions were successful with an optimal blood flow achieved during the first session of dialysis in all cases. A catheter-related complication was detected in 33.3% (n=35) patients (48.6% infections; 28.6% TDC dysfunction; 14.3% local complications; 5.7% accidental catheter retractions; 2.8% catheter migrations). At a median follow-up of 10.5±8.5 months, a total of 85 patients (80.9%) was re-hospitalized, in 28 cases (26.7%) for a catheter-related cause. The median catheter patency rate was 122 days. At the last follow-up, 39 patients (37.1%) were still dialyzed on catheter, 30(28.6%) were dialyzed on an arteriovenous fistula and 7(6.7%) received a kidney transplantation. Two patients (2%) were transferred to peritoneal dialysis and two patients (2%) recover from renal insufficiency. Mortality rate was 23.8% (25 patients). Causes of death were myocardial infarction (n=13, 52%), sepsis (n=9, 36%); one patient (4%) died from pneumonia, one (4%) from uremic encephalopathy and one (4%) from massive hematemesis. CONCLUSION: TDCs may represent the only possible access in some patients, however they are burned with a high rate of complications, re-hospital admission and mortality. Results from this institutional experience are in line with previously published literature data in terms of morbidity and mortality. The present results reiterate once more that TDC must be regarded as a temporary solution while permanent access creation should be prioritized. Strict surveillance should be held in patients having TDC for the early identification of complications allowing the prompt treatment and modifying the catheter insertion site whenever needed.


Subject(s)
Renal Dialysis , Humans , Male , Renal Dialysis/mortality , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/mortality , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Prospective Studies , Central Venous Catheters , Catheter-Related Infections/mortality , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology
2.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(5): e232-e238, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695702

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Ethanol lock therapy (ELT) is a potential method of central catheter salvage following central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) although there is potential risk of catheter damage in polyurethane catheters. Further, there is limited efficacy data across the spectrum of common pediatric catheters, and published ELT protocols describe dwell times that are not feasible for critically ill children. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ELT in polyurethane catheters using brief (30 min to 2 hr) dwell times in our PICU. DESIGN: Investigational pilot study using historical control data. SETTING: PICU in quaternary care, free-standing children's hospital. INTERVENTIONS: ELT in polyurethane central venous catheters for catheter salvage. RESULTS: ELT with brief dwell times was used in 25 patients, 22 of whom were bacteremic. Ultimately 11 patients, comprising 14 catheters, were diagnosed with a primary CLABSI. The catheter salvage rate in primary CLABSI patients receiving ELT was 92% (13/14) and significantly higher than the salvage rate in patients receiving antibiotics alone (non-ELT) (62%, 39/64; mean difference 0.32, 95% CI [0.14-0.50], p = 0.03). The rate of catheter fracture in all patients receiving ELT was 8% (2/25) while the rate of fracture in the non-ELT group was 13% (8/64; mean difference -0.05, 95% CI [-0.18 to 0.09], p = 0.72). The rate of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) use in the ELT group was 8% (2/25), whereas the rate of tPA use in the non-ELT group was significantly higher at 42% (26/64; mean difference -0.34, 95% CI [-0.49 to -0.17], p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ELT for catheter salvage and prophylaxis in the PICU is safe in a variety of polyurethane catheters. Dwell times ranging from 30 minutes to 2 hours were effective in sterilizing the catheters while allowing other therapies to continue. This approach may decrease the need for frequent line changes in a medically fragile pediatric population.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Ethanol , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Polyurethanes , Humans , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Child , Pilot Projects , Ethanol/administration & dosage , Male , Child, Preschool , Female , Infant , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Adolescent , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Bacteremia/etiology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use
5.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(6): 1409-1416, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503625

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use wearable video-recording technology to measure precisely the timing of discrete events during perioperative central venous catheter (CVC) placements. DESIGN: A single-center, observational, exploratory study on the use of wearable video-recording technology during intraoperative CVC placement. SETTING: The study was conducted at a University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical anesthesia residents, cardiothoracic anesthesia fellows, and attending anesthesiologists participated in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were asked to use eye-tracking glasses prior to the placement of a CVC in the cardiac operating rooms. No other instruction was given to the participants. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors measured the total time to complete the CVC placement, phase-specific time, and specific times of interest. They compared these times across 3 training levels and tested differences with analysis of variance. The authors' findings indicated significant differences in total CVC placement time when the procedure included a pulmonary artery catheter insertion (1,170 ± 364, 923 ± 272, and 596 ± 226 seconds; F2,63 = 12.71, p < 0.0001). Additionally, they found differences in interval times and times of interest. The authors observed a reduction of variability with increasing experience during the CVC placement phase. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, the study authors describe their experience using first-person wearable video-recording technology to precisely measure the timing of discrete events during CVC placement by anesthesia residents and anesthesiologists. Future work will leverage the eye-tracking capabilities of the existing hardware to identify areas of inefficiency to develop actionable targets for interventions that could improve trainee performance and patient safety.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous , Operating Rooms , Video Recording , Humans , Video Recording/methods , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Wearable Electronic Devices , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Central Venous Catheters , Internship and Residency/methods , Male , Female , Anesthesiologists
6.
Semin Dial ; 37(3): 273-276, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432229

ABSTRACT

Mechanical problems like break or crack in Luer connectors or hubs, clamps, and tubings are common non-infectious complications of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC), which may lead to other TDC complications and the need to insert a new catheter. These can be tackled using TDC repair kits or spare parts, which are often not available, resulting in the insertion of a new TDC that increases morbidity, TDC-related procedures, and healthcare costs. We discuss two cases of broken Luer connections of TDC, which were managed by exchanging the broken Luer connector of TDC with the similar Luer connector of a temporary dialysis catheter. Both the repaired TDCs are thereafter functioning well. This improvised technique provides an easy, effective, long-lasting option that salvages the existing TDC and reduces the cost factor.


Subject(s)
Catheters, Indwelling , Equipment Failure , Renal Dialysis , Humans , Renal Dialysis/economics , Renal Dialysis/instrumentation , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/economics , Male , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Middle Aged , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/economics , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Device Removal/methods , Device Removal/economics , Equipment Design
7.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 41: 123-130, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401289

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) compared with centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs). METHODS: Prospective cohort study was followed by an economic analysis over a 30-day time horizon. Propensity score matching was used to select hospitalized adults with similar indications for PICC or CICC. The composite outcome was device removal or replacement because of complications before the end of treatment. The economic evaluation was based on a decision tree model for cost-effectiveness analysis, with calculation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per catheter removal avoided. All costs are presented in Brazilian reais (BRL) (1 BRL = 0.1870 US dollar). RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were followed in each group; 172 (79.3%) of those receiving a PICC and 135 (62.2%) of those receiving a CICC had no device-related complication, respectively. When comparing the events leading to device removal, the risk of composite endpoint was significantly higher in the CICC group (hazard ratio 0.20; 95% CI 0.11-0.35). The cost of PICC placement was BRL 1290.98 versus BRL 467.16 for a CICC. In the base case, the ICER for placing a PICC instead of a CICC was BRL 3349.91 per removal or replacement avoided. On univariate sensitivity analyses, the model proved to be robust within an ICER range of 2500.00 to 4800.00 BRL. CONCLUSIONS: PICC placement was associated with a lower risk of complications than CICC placement. Although the cost of a PICC is higher, its use avoided complications and need for catheter replacement before the end of treatment.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous , Catheterization, Peripheral , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Male , Female , Catheterization, Peripheral/economics , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Brazil , Catheterization, Central Venous/economics , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Aged , Adult , Propensity Score , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
8.
Ir J Med Sci ; 193(3): 1461-1466, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349509

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Implantable central venous port systems are widely used in oncology. We upgraded our fluoroscopy machines, and all anesthetists completed two training courses focusing on the risks of ionizing radiation for patients and health workers. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of upgrading the machines and the radiation-protection training on ionizing radiation exposure during venous port system implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive venous port implantations between 2019 and 2022. The older fluoroscopy machines were replaced by two new machines. A first training session about health worker radioprotection was organized. The medical staff completed a second training course focused on protecting patients from ionizing radiation. We defined four distinct time intervals (TI): venous port implantations performed with the old equipment, the new fluoroscopy machines, after the first training course, and after the second training course. The air kerma-area product (KAP) was compared between these four TI and fluoroscopy times and the number of exposures only with the new machines. RESULTS: We analyzed 2587 procedures. A 93% decrease in the median KAP between the first and last TI was noted (median KAP = 323.0 mGy.cm2 vs. 24.0 mGy.cm2, p < 0.0001). A decrease in the KAP was observed for each of the 11 anesthetists. We also noted a significant decrease in the time of fluoroscopy and the number of exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Upgrading the fluoroscopy equipment and completing two dedicated training courses allowed for a drastic decrease patient exposure to ionizing radiation during venous access port implantation by non-radiologist practitioners.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Fluoroscopy , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/methods , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Female , Male , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Middle Aged
9.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 103: 14-21, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38307236

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although it is evident that a prior history of tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) affects arteriovenous fistula (AVF) function, it is unclear whether its location (contralateral versus ipsilateral to AVF) has any effect on AVF maturation and failure rates. We aimed to document this possible effect. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing outcomes between patients with contralateral TDC (CONTRA group) and those with ipsilateral one (IPSI group) were examined for inclusion. A random effects model meta-analysis of the odds ratio (OR) was conducted. Primary outcomes were AVF functional maturation, assisted maturation, and failure rates. RESULTS: Four eligible studies comprising 763 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in terms of AVF functional maturation (OR: 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-3.47; I2 = 83.4%), assisted maturation (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.29-1.19; I2 = 61.4%), and failure rates (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.29-1.58; I2 = 83.3%) between the 2 study groups. CONCLUSIONS: TDC laterality seems not to affect fistula maturation rate in patients requiring TDC placement and concurrent AVF creation, but rather, vein- and patient-related characteristics might play a more important role in choosing TDC access site. Further studies are needed to validate these results.


Subject(s)
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical , Renal Dialysis , Humans , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Catheters, Indwelling , Central Venous Catheters , Aged , Vascular Patency , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Time Factors , Odds Ratio , Treatment Failure , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/etiology , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/physiopathology , Chi-Square Distribution
10.
Metas enferm ; 27(1): 82-90, Febr. 2024. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-230213

ABSTRACT

Para gestionar el capital venoso del paciente con seguridad y responsabilidad es necesario aumentar la calidad de los cuidados proporcionados, unificando y estandarizando los criterios de actuación, basándose siempre en la mejor evidencia científica. Las enfermeras de los Servicios de Urgencias deben aplicar la evidencia en el manejo del catéter venoso central de inserción periférica (PICC), conocer el protocolo aprobado por la Dirección Asistencial de su hospital y, sobre todo, evitar la variabilidad en la actuación, que podría aumentar los riesgos relacionados con la atención sanitaria, así como la desconfianza del paciente. Mantener actualizados los conocimientos y promover la adquisición de habilidades en la práctica clínica es de suma importancia para garantizar cuidados de calidad en el manejo de este tipo de catéteres, debiéndose comprobar periódicamente el grado de cumplimiento de la evidencia recogida en los protocolos existentes en el hospital. Las enfermeras tienen el reto de estar al día en el manejo de los accesos vasculares, y deben responder con seriedad y evidencia a los cuidados que necesitan los pacientes a los que se atienden. En este manuscrito se objetiva la necesidad de formar y capacitar de forma continua a los profesionales para el manejo adecuado del PICC. (AU)


In order to manage the venous resource of the patient safely and with responsibility, it is necessary to increase the quality of care provided, unifying and standardizing performance criteria, always based on the best scientific evidence. Emergency Unit nurses must apply evidence in their use of the peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC), they must know the protocol approved by the Patient Care Management in their hospital and, most of all, must avoid variability of action, which could increase the risks associated with healthcare as well as mistrust by patients. It is extremely important to keep an updated knowledge and to promote the acquisition of clinical practice skills, in order to guarantee quality care in the use of this type of catheters; the level of compliance of the evidence collected in the hospital protocols must be confirmed periodically. Nurses face the challenge of being updated in the management of vascular accesses, and must give response with seriousness and evidence to the care needed by their patients. This manuscript sets out objectively the need for continuous training and qualification for professionals regarding the adequate use of PICC. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Nursing Care/methods , Evidence-Based Practice , Evidence-Based Nursing , Patient Care
11.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 35(5): 751-758, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342222

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of fever at diagnosis in children with leukemia and determine if fever at diagnosis is a predictor of bloodstream infection (BSI) or central venous access device (CVAD) removal for infection either within the first 30 days or between 30 and 90 days after CVAD insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-one patients with acute leukemia (July 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020) who underwent a CVAD insertion within 2 weeks of diagnosis were included. Patient data included demographic characteristics, fever at diagnosis, CVAD type, antibiotics before and/or on the day of CVAD insertion, BSI incidence, BSI rates per 1,000 catheter days, and need for catheter removal after CVAD insertion within 30 days and between 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: Patients with fever at diagnosis had a significantly higher incidence of BSI within the first 30 days after CVAD insertion (17/23) than that among patients without fever (6/23) (P = .046) at diagnosis. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of BSI between 30 and 90 days after CVAD insertion between patients with fever (5/11) and those without fever at diagnosis (6/11) (P = .519). Fever at diagnosis was not a predictor of CVAD removal within 30 days (9 patients required CVAD removal; 7/9 had fever and 2/9 had no fever) (P = .181) or between 30 and 90 days (4 patients required CVAD removal; 1/4 had fever and 3/4 had no fever at diagnosis) (P = .343) after insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Fever at diagnosis in patients with leukemia is not a predictor of CVAD removal for infection.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Device Removal , Fever , Humans , Male , Female , Child , Child, Preschool , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Incidence , Time Factors , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/etiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Adolescent , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Infant , Risk Assessment , Leukemia/therapy , Leukemia/complications , Treatment Outcome , Age Factors , Predictive Value of Tests , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/epidemiology
12.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 35(5): 759-766, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244918

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report the safety and effectiveness of fibrin sheath stripping of pediatric chest ports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fibrin sheath stripping procedures for pediatric chest ports between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment indication was the inability to aspirate blood from the port. The technical success, adverse events, days of primary and secondary service intervals, fluoroscopy time, and fluoroscopy dose were recorded. RESULTS: Fibrin sheath stripping procedures were performed in 15 patients for a total of 18 procedures. All patients treated with fibrin sheath stripping had failed fibrinolytic treatment and a preprocedural fluoroscopy examination suggestive of fibrin sheath before attempting stripping. All fibrin sheath stripping procedures were technically successful. The median and mean total days of primary service interval from the date of port placement to the date of suspected fibrin sheath were 666 and 617 days, respectively. The median and mean total number of days of secondary service interval were 385 and 561 days, respectively. The mean fluoroscopy time was 16.9 minutes. The mean fluoroscopy air kerma was 29.8 mGy. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrin sheath stripping is a safe and effective minimally invasive option to maintain the function of pediatric chest ports.


Subject(s)
Fibrin , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Treatment Outcome , Child , Time Factors , Infant , Radiography, Interventional , Adolescent , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Fluoroscopy , Catheters, Indwelling , Risk Factors , Radiation Dosage , Punctures
13.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 58(5): 530-534, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153161

ABSTRACT

This report demonstrates the successful treatment of a carotid artery pseudoaneurysm using percutaneous thrombin injection. The patient, a 62-year-old woman with multiple comorbidities, experienced a pseudoaneurysm following an unintentional carotid artery puncture during a failed attempt to place a triple lumen catheter in the right jugular vein. Percutaneous thrombin injection was chosen as the treatment method, with Doppler ultrasound monitoring. Follow-up examinations showed no signs of recurrence, and the patient was discharged after nine days without complications.


Subject(s)
Carotid Artery Injuries , Iatrogenic Disease , Punctures , Thrombin , Vascular System Injuries , Humans , Thrombin/administration & dosage , Female , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Carotid Artery Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery Injuries/drug therapy , Carotid Artery Injuries/etiology , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Vascular System Injuries/etiology , Vascular System Injuries/drug therapy , Aneurysm, False/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, False/drug therapy , Aneurysm, False/etiology , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Hemostatics/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Jugular Veins/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography , Ultrasonography, Doppler
15.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ; 34(6): 507-513, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725200

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of acute central venous catheters (CVC) using a sodium bicarbonate catheter locking solution (SBCLS) versus an antibiotic catheter locking solution (ACLS). Our study included patients aged >18 years on hemodialysis initiated through an internal jugular non-tunneled CVC. Safety was assessed by comparing catheter loss resulting from catheter dysfunction (CD) and catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI) in two study groups: the SBCLS group (using 7.5% sodium bicarbonate) and the ACLS group (using antibiotic + heparin). Efficacy was assessed by the adequacy of blood flow (>300 mL/min). In total, 160 patients were included: 80 with the SBCLS and 80 with the ACLS. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical demographics between the groups. The average duration of the catheters was 23 days in the ACLS group and 22 days in the SBCLS group. In the ACLS group, four lost catheters to CD, two lost them to CRBSI, and five lost them to other malfunctions. Adequate blood flow was achieved in 71 patients. In the SBCLS group, three lost catheters to CD, three lost them to CRBSI, and four lost them to other malfunctions. Adequate blood flow was achieved in 73 patients. No significant differences between the groups were observed for catheter loss to CRBSI (P = 0.648), CD (P = 0.699), malfunction (P = 0.731), and blood flow (P = 0.598). The safety and efficacy of non-tunneled CVC with sodium bicarbonate as the catheter locking solution were similar to those of the ACLS.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Renal Dialysis , Sodium Bicarbonate , Humans , Renal Dialysis/instrumentation , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Sodium Bicarbonate/administration & dosage , Sodium Bicarbonate/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Equipment Design
17.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 17(3): 429-433, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35110377

ABSTRACT

Measures implemented to prevent transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in outpatient dialysis facilities may also help to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections in patients receiving hemodialysis. We used United States Renal Data System data to examine rates of antibiotic administration within dialysis facilities and rates of hospital admission for catheter-associated bloodstream infection from March 2018 through November 2020, and rates of hospitalization for sepsis, to address overall changes in hospitalization during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Using logistic regression, we estimated year-over-year adjusted odds ratios of these events in 3-month intervals. During the first 6 months of the pandemic, rates of antibiotic administration were between 20% and 21% lower, and rates of hospitalization for catheter-associated bloodstream infection were between 17% and 24% lower than during corresponding periods in 2019, without significant changes in rates of hospitalization for sepsis. However, rates of catheter-associated events also decreased between 2018 and 2019, driven by reductions in facilities operated by a large dialysis provider. These data suggest that significant reductions in catheter-associated infections occurred during the pandemic, superimposed on nonpandemic-related reductions in some facilities before the pandemic. Even after the pandemic, it may be prudent to continue some COVID-19 mitigation measures to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Infection Control , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/transmission , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Protective Factors , Renal Dialysis/instrumentation , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United States
18.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 306, 2022 01 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35013367

ABSTRACT

Some hemodialysis patients are not suitable for creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG). However, they can receive a tunneled cuffed central venous catheter (tcCVC), but this carries risks of infection and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of brachial artery transposition (BAT) versus those of tcCVC. This retrospective study evaluated hemodialysis patients who underwent BAT or tcCVC placement because of severe heart failure, hand ischemia, central venous stenosis or occlusion, inadequate vessels for creating standard arteriovenous access, or limited life expectancy. The primary outcome was whole access circuit patency. Thirty-eight patients who underwent BAT and 25 who underwent tcCVC placement were included. One-year patency rates for the whole access circuit were 84.6% and 44.9% in the BAT and tcCVC groups, respectively. The BAT group was more likely to maintain patency (unadjusted hazard ratio: 0.17, 95% confidence interval: 0.05-0.60, p = 0.006). The two groups did not have significantly different overall survival (log-rank p = 0.146), although severe complications were less common in the BAT group (3% vs. 28%, p = 0.005). Relative to tcCVC placement, BAT is safe and effective with acceptable patency in hemodialysis patients not suitable for AVF or AVG creation.


Subject(s)
Brachial Artery/surgery , Catheterization, Central Venous , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Renal Dialysis , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Brachial Artery/physiopathology , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheters, Indwelling , Central Venous Catheters , Female , Humans , Japan , Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis , Kidney Failure, Chronic/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Patency , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
19.
Breast Dis ; 41(1): 1-3, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34219707

ABSTRACT

During the first hit of SARS-COVID pandemic, an important reorganization of Healthcare Services has been done, and new protocols and pathways to protect frail patients like oncological patients were designed. The second hit of pandemic had stressed these new pathways and suggests to health-workers some improvements for safer management of patents.We reported our experience in organizing the clinical pathway of neoadjuvant therapy candidate patients based on the execution of sentinel lympho-node biopsy and the placement of implantable venous access port in the same access to operating room before neoadjuvant chemotherapy suggesting a possible organizational model. In the period October-December 2020 we have included in this new type of path twelve patients and we have not registered any cases of COVID among the patients included. We think this new path, adopted amid the second hit, will be useful for all Breast Units that are facing the challenge of guaranteeing the highest standards of care in a historical moment where the health emergency occupies the efforts of health workers and the economic resources of health systems.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Infection Control/methods , Patient Safety , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheterization, Central Venous/standards , Central Venous Catheters , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Critical Pathways , Female , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/standards
20.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 24280, 2021 12 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34930987

ABSTRACT

Ultrasound verification of the guidewire traveling along the vein parallel to it and without any changes in angle has been recommended for prevention of inadvertent arterial catheterization during central venous catheter (CVC) placement. The aim of this study was to determine the availability of this parallel guidewire imaging during internal jugular CVC placement. Fifty-six adult patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery were included. The success rate of acquiring a parallel guidewire image was assessed. Logistic regression models and generalized additive models were used to identify the factors contributing to achieve parallel guidewire imaging. Among 56 patients in whom the guidewire was correctly positioned, the parallel guidewire image was acquired in 45 (80%) patients. Body mass index (crude odds ratio: 0.74 [95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.91]; p = 0.004) and distance from the puncture site to the clavicle (crude odds ratio: 1.32 [95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.58]; p = 0.002) were associated with successful depiction. The predicted probability of successful visualization was 96% (95% confidence interval: 82-99%) when the distance from the puncture site to the clavicle was 50 mm. The distance is a reliable predictor for successful visualization, and thus it should be considered when performing internal jugular CVC placement.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Central Venous Catheters , Jugular Veins/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Ultrasonography/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Male , Odds Ratio , Probability , Prospective Studies , Punctures , Regression Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...