Analysis of pharmacokinetic profile and ecotoxicological character of cefepime and its photodegradation products.

An important problem is the impact of photodegradation on product toxicity in biological tests, which may be complex and context-dependent. Previous studies have described the pharmacology of cefepime, but the toxicological effects of its photodegradation products remain largely unknown. Therefore, photodegradation studies were undertaken in conditions similar to those occurring in biological systems insilico, in vitro, in vivo and ecotoxicological experiments. The structures of four cefepime photodegradation products were determined by UPLC-MS/MS method. The calculated in silico ADMET profile indicates that carcinogenic potential is expected for compounds CP-1, cefepime, CP-2 and CP-3. The Cell Line Cytomotovity Predictor 2.0 tool was used to predict the cytotoxic effects of cefepime and related compounds in non-transformed and cancer cell lines. The results indicate that possible actions include: non-small cell lung cancer, breast adenocarcinoma, prostate cancer and papillary renal cell carcinoma. OPERA models were used to predict absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) endpoints, and potential bioactivity of CP-2, cefepime and CP-4. The results obtained in silico show that after 96h of exposure, cefepime, CP-1, CP-2, and CP-3 are moderately toxic in the zebrafish model, while CP-4 is highly toxic. On the contrary, cefepime is more toxic to T. platyurus (highly toxic) compared to the zebrafish model, similar to products CP-4, CP-3 and CP-2. In vitro cytotoxicity studies were performed by MTT assay and in vivo acute embryo toxicity studies using Danio rerio embryos and larvae. In vitro showed an increase in the cytotoxicity of products with the longest exposure period i.e. for 8 h. Additionally, at a concentration of 200 µg/mL, statistically significant changes in metabolic activity were observed depending on the irradiation time. In vivo studies conducted with Zebrafish showed that both cefepime and its photodegradation products have only low toxicity. Assessment of potential ecotoxicity included Microbiotests on invertebrates (Thamnotoxkit F and Daphtoxkit F), and luminescence inhibition tests (LumiMara). The observed toxicity of the tested solutions towards both Thamnocephalus platyurus and Daphnia magna indicates that the parent substance (unexposed) has lower toxicity, which increases during irradiation. The acute toxicity (Lumi Mara) of nonirradiated cefepime solution is low for all tested strains (<10%), but mixtures of cefepime and its photoproducts showed growth inhibition against all tested strains (except #6, Photobacterium phoreum). Generally, it can be concluded that after UV-Vis irradiation, the mixture of cefepime phototransformation products shows a significant increase in toxicity.

Prospective assessment of breakthrough infections and neurotoxicity and their association with cefepime trough concentrations in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Cefepime is a first-line antibiotic for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) in haematological cancer patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of cefepime is frequently advocated. However, it remains unclear what range of concentrations should be targeted for maximal efficacy and minimal toxicity. Therefore, we examined the relationship between cefepime exposure and clinical efficacy or neurotoxicity in FN patients. This prospective, observational, single-centre study included all adult hospitalised patients presenting with FN at the haematology ward and treated with cefepime from August 2019 until October 2020. Primary outcomes were incidence of breakthrough infection and neurotoxicity and their relationship with free cefepime serum trough concentrations. A total of 76 patients were included, contributing 96 cefepime treatment courses. The median (interquartile range) estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (eGFRCKD-EPI) and free cefepime trough concentration were 101 (85-112) mL/min/1.73m2 and 8.6 (4.9-16.2) mg/L, respectively. Interpatient and intrapatient variability in cefepime trough concentrations was largely explained by renal function. No cefepime-related breakthrough infections occurred during cefepime treatment. Neurotoxicity, probably induced by cefepime administration, occurred during 6/96 (6.3%) treatment courses. Patients with neurotoxicity showed a significant trend for higher trough concentrations (median 15.4 mg/L vs. 8.6 mg/L; P < 0.001). This study provides real-world clinical data showing that high cefepime dosage is efficacious and safe in FN patients. Routine TDM does not appear to be needed in FN patients with preserved renal function. However, TDM might be reserved for FN patients at high risk of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity or when intended to cover pathogens with a minimum inhibitory concentration >1 mg/L.

Myoclonic status epilepticus induced by cefepime overdose requiring haemodialysis.

We report a case of cefepime neurotoxicity characterised by myoclonic status epilepticus with coma, in a context of acute renal failure and requiring one discontinuous conventional haemodialysis. Cefepime is a fourth-generation broad-spectrum cephalosporin mainly used to treat hospital-acquired Gram-negative infections. Acute neurotoxicity is an increasingly reported adverse effect which occurs predominantly in patients with renal impairment. Renal replacement therapy has been proposed to treat this condition.

Incidence of Nephrotoxicity Among Pediatric Patients Receiving Vancomycin With Either Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies in adults have found an incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients treated with a combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) that is greater than that expected with either medication alone. The purpose of this study was to determine whether combination therapy with vancomycin and TZP is associated with an incidence of AKI in pediatric patients higher than that in those on combination therapy with vancomycin and cefepime. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center matched-cohort study of pediatric patients who received vancomycin in combination with TZP or cefepime between January 2015 and June 2016. The patients were matched according to chronic disease, age, sex, and number of concomitant nephrotoxic medications at the time of combination antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI. Secondary outcomes included differences between groups in time to AKI, resolution of AKI, and effect of vancomycin trough levels on the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare categorical and continuous variables between treatment groups. Conditional Poisson regression was used to assess the association between AKI and treatment groups. Stratified log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models with shared frailty were used to compare the times to AKI according to treatment group. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-eight matched patients were included. AKI developed in 9 (7.9%) of 114 and 33 (28.9%) of 114 patients in the cefepime and TZP groups, respectively (P < .001). Type of combination therapy remained a significant predictor for AKI in multivariate conditional Poisson analysis in which adjustments were made for age, sex, use of concomitant nephrotoxins, and vancomycin dose (relative risk, 2.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-5.8]; P = .03). AKI developed almost 3 times sooner in the TZP group than in the cefepime group (hazard ratio, 2.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.3-6.1]; P = .006). Sensitivity analyses in which adjustment was made for antibiotic indication in addition to the aforementioned variables and excluding those with gastrointestinal infection revealed similar results. CONCLUSION: Among hospitalized children at our institution, combination therapy with vancomycin and TZP was associated with an incidence of AKI higher than that associated with vancomycin and cefepime.