Pharmacokinetic differences between the epimers of cefotetan disodium after single intravenous injection in healthy Chinese volunteers.

The pharmacokinetic behaviors of the epimers of cefotetan disodium (R-CTT, S-CTT) after a single intravenous injection dose in healthy Chinese volunteers were explored in this study. In an open-label, randomized, three-way, cross-over study, 12 volunteers (6 females and 6 males) received a cross-over fashion doses of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g of cefotetan disodium, separated by washout periods of 7 days. The plasma concentrations of both epimers were measured by validated high-performance liquid chromatography assays. Pharmacokinetic parameters of R-CTT, S-CTT, and total-CTT (R + S mixture) were calculated using a noncompartmental analysis. Generally, the R and S epimers showed different pharmacokinetic behaviors. Following 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g doses of cefotetan disodium, values of the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-∞)) were 124.23 ± 19.54, 231.34 ± 39.34, and 459.09 ± 80.65 for R-CTT; 100.95 ± 14.19, 193.80 ± 30.42, and 372.66 ± 67.32 for S-CTT, respectively. Total body clearance values were 4.13, 4.43, and 4.46 L/h for R-CTT and 5.05, 5.28, and 5.50 L/h for S-CTT, respectively. Mean plasma elimination half-life (t (1/2)) values of R-CTT were 4.16, 4.13, and 4.01 h for 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g doses, respectively, and those of S-CTT were 3.15, 3.25, and 3.21 h. There were significant differences in t (1/2) between the two epimers (P < 0.05). The t (1/2) of R-CTT was 28% longer than that of S-CTT, which indicated that the elimination of the S-CTT was greater than that of the R-CTT. All treatments were well tolerated.

Formulary evaluation of second-generation cephamycin derivatives using decision analysis.

Use of decision analysis in the formulary evaluation of the second-generation cephamycin derivatives cefoxitin, cefotetan, and cefmetazole is described. The rating system used was adapted from one used for the third-generation cephalosporins. Data on spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, adverse reactions, cost, and stability were taken from the published literature and the FDA-approved product labeling. The weighting scheme used for the third-generation cephalosporins was altered somewhat to reflect the more important aspects of the cephamycin derivatives and their potential role in surgical prophylaxis. Sensitivity analysis was done to assess the variability of the final scores when the assigned weights were varied within a reasonable range. Scores for cefmetazole and cefotetan were similar and did not differ significantly after sensitivity analysis. Cefoxitin scored significantly lower than the other two drugs. In the absence of data suggesting that the N-methyl thiotetrazole side chains of cefmetazole and cefotetan cause substantial toxicity, these two drugs can be considered the most cost-efficient members of the second-generation cephamycins.