Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Mol Med (Berl) ; 99(4): 489-500, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651139

ABSTRACT

Along with emergence of the organoids, their application in biomedical research has been currently one of the most fascinating themes. For the past few years, scientists have made significant contributions to deriving organoids representing the whole brain and specific brain regions. Coupled with somatic cell reprogramming and CRISPR/Cas9 editing, the organoid technologies were applied for disease modeling and drug screening. The methods to develop organoids further improved for rapid and efficient generation of cerebral organoids. Additionally, refining the methods to develop the regionally specified brain organoids enabled the investigation of development and interaction of the specific brain regions. Recent studies started resolving the issue in the lack of non-neuroectodermal cells in brain organoids, including vascular endothelial cells and microglia, which play fundamental roles in neurodevelopment and are involved in the pathophysiology of acute and chronic neural disorders. In this review, we highlight recent advances of neuronal organoid technologies, focusing on the region-specific brain organoids and complementation with endothelial cells and microglia, and discuss their potential applications to neuronal diseases.


Subject(s)
Brain/cytology , Endothelial Cells/cytology , Microglia/cytology , Organoids/cytology , Animals , Brain/anatomy & histology , Brain/embryology , Cellular Reprogramming Techniques/ethics , Cellular Reprogramming Techniques/methods , Embryoid Bodies/cytology , Fetus/anatomy & histology , Fibroblast Growth Factor 2/pharmacology , Hedgehog Proteins/pharmacology , Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells , Humans , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/drug effects , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/pharmacology , Neurons/cytology , Organ Specificity , Organogenesis/drug effects , Organoids/blood supply , Retina/cytology , Retina/embryology , Spinal Cord/cytology , Spinal Cord/embryology , Wnt Signaling Pathway
2.
Stem Cell Res Ther ; 10(1): 341, 2019 11 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31753034

ABSTRACT

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can self-renew indefinitely in culture and differentiate into all specialized cell types including gametes. iPSCs do not exist naturally and are instead generated ("induced" or "reprogrammed") in culture from somatic cells through ectopic co-expression of defined pluripotency factors. Since they can be generated from any healthy person or patient, iPSCs are considered as a valuable resource for regenerative medicine to replace diseased or damaged tissues. In addition, reprogramming technology has provided a powerful tool to study mechanisms of cell fate decisions and to model human diseases, thereby substantially potentiating the possibility to (i) discover new drugs in screening formats and (ii) treat life-threatening diseases through cell therapy-based strategies. However, various legal and ethical barriers arise when aiming to exploit the full potential of iPSCs to minimize abuse or unauthorized utilization. In this review, we discuss bioethical, legal, and societal concerns associated with research and therapy using iPSCs. Furthermore, we present key questions and suggestions for stem cell scientists, legal authorities, and social activists investigating and working in this field.


Subject(s)
Bioethical Issues , Biomedical Research/ethics , Cellular Reprogramming Techniques/ethics , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...