Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 29(7): 2272-2280, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32712687

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify the morphological patterns of suprascapular notch stenosis. METHODS: Suprascapular notch space capacity was assessed by morphometric analysis of 333 dry scapulae. Suprascapular notch parameters-superior transverse distance, middle width, depth, medial border length and lateral border length-were measured. The probable suprascapular notch stenosis was referenced by (1) comparing each obtained parameter measurement to the range of the suprascapular nerve diameter, and (2) quantifying the reduced parameters. Finally, the morphological pattern was determined based on the collective reduction of the parameters and their alignments. RESULTS: Five types of suprascapular notch based on depth to superior transverse distance ratio were identified and assessed. Type-I showed low incidence of stenosis (6/333) and low frequency within type (6/28) with potential risk of horizontal compression. Type-II showed relatively low incidence of stenosis (9/333) and low frequency within type (9/50) with undetermined pattern. Type-III showed relatively higher incidence of stenosis (47/333) but low frequency within type (47/158) with potential risk of vertical compression. Type-IV (foramen) showed low incidence of stenosis (6/333) and relatively lower frequency within type (6/26) with potential risk of encircled compression. Finally, type-V (discrete) showed relatively high incidence of stenosis (40/333) and high frequency within type (40/71) with potential risk of vertical compression. The suprascapular notch was found to be stenosed beyond its capacity to accommodate the suprascapular nerve in 49/333. Type-V is at most risk followed by Type-III. CONCLUSIONS: Suprascapular notch stenosis takes three morphological patterns: horizontal, vertical or mixed. An osteoplasty of suprascapular notch margins may be required beside the common surgical approach of the superior transverse scapular ligamentectomy.


Subject(s)
Nerve Compression Syndromes/epidemiology , Scapula/pathology , Cadaver , Cementoplasty/statistics & numerical data , Constriction, Pathologic/epidemiology , Constriction, Pathologic/pathology , Humans , Incidence , Nerve Compression Syndromes/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Scapula/surgery , Shoulder/surgery
2.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 25(8): E245-53, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22643183

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) with polymethylmethacrylate is widely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture and satisfactory clinical outcomes have been reported in the literature. However, recurrent or persistent back pain after PV is not uncommon. Sometimes, the pain may result from pathogenesis within the previously treated vertebra. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeat PV for treating patients with recurrent back pain caused by the previously cemented vertebrae. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 18 patients who underwent repeat PV to treat symptomatic cemented vertebrae. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on clinical presentation and imaging studies: those with refracture (RF), residual vacuum (RV), and osteonecrosis (ON) along the bone-cement interface. A bipedicle approach was used for repeat PV in all patients. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and modified Brodsky criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes before and after surgery. The Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Spearman correlation analyses were used to analyze patient surgical prognosis and radiologic findings. RESULTS: Nine patients were diagnosed with RF, 5 with RV, and 4 with ON. The average VAS score was 77.1 (range, 62-90) before repeat PV (80.1, 72.4, and 76.3 for the RF, RV, and ON groups, respectively) and 34.4 (range, 25-45) after repeat PV treatment (33.1, 36.8, and 34.3 for the RF, RV, and ON groups, respectively). The VAS score significantly decreased in all 3 groups. The vertebral body height was significantly restored by a mean of 13.9% across all groups (17.8%, 12.7%, and 6.8% in the RF, RV, and ON groups, respectively). Fifteen patients recovered from vertebral compression fracture and regained their preinjury activities of daily living. No surgery-related complications occurred except asymptomatic cement leakage in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this research demonstrate that repeat PV may be an effective method for relieving recurrent or persistent pain in patients with symptomatic cemented vertebrae, allowing them to regain functional activity.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/etiology , Cementoplasty , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Spinal Fusion , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Back Pain/epidemiology , Bone Cements/therapeutic use , Cementoplasty/statistics & numerical data , Failed Back Surgery Syndrome/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Osteonecrosis/epidemiology , Osteonecrosis/etiology , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Recurrence , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...