Urinary MicroRNA-Based Diagnostic Model for Central Nervous System Tumors Using Nanowire Scaffolds.

There are no accurate mass screening methods for early detection of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Recently, liquid biopsy has received a lot of attention for less-invasive cancer screening. Unlike other cancers, CNS tumors require efforts to find biomarkers due to the blood-brain barrier, which restricts molecular exchange between the parenchyma and blood. Additionally, because a satisfactory way to collect urinary biomarkers is lacking, urine-based liquid biopsy has not been fully investigated despite the fact that it has some advantages compared to blood or cerebrospinal fluid-based biopsy. Here, we have developed a mass-producible and sterilizable nanowire-based device that can extract urinary microRNAs efficiently. Urinary microRNAs from patients with CNS tumors (n = 119) and noncancer individuals (n = 100) were analyzed using a microarray to yield comprehensive microRNA expression profiles. To clarify the origin of urinary microRNAs of patients with CNS tumors, glioblastoma organoids were generated. Glioblastoma organoid-derived differentially expressed microRNAs (DEMs) included 73.4% of the DEMs in urine of patients with parental tumors but included only 3.9% of those in urine of noncancer individuals, which suggested that many CNS tumor-derived microRNAs could be identified in urine directly. We constructed the diagnostic model based on the expression of the selected microRNAs and found that it was able to differentiate patients and noncancer individuals at a sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 97%, respectively, in an independent dataset. Our findings demonstrate that urinary microRNAs extracted with the nanowire device offer a well-fitted strategy for mass screening of CNS tumors.

Calculated versus measured creatinine clearance for dosing methotrexate in the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) (>or=3 g/m2), the cornerstone of therapy for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), is commonly dosed using a measured 24 h creatinine clearance (CrCl) every 2-4 weeks. Because these collections are cumbersome and at times unreliable, the use of a calculated CrCl was evaluated as a potential alternative. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on data from all 287 treatment cycles from the 25 patients with PCNSL who participated in a multi-center phase II clinical trial of HDMTX conducted by the New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) CNS Consortium. RESULTS: The 25 patients had a median age of 61 years (range 32-75). Seventeen (68%) were men. The patients received a median of 14 (range 2-21) HDMTX treatments. For 256 of 287 treatments (89%), data were available to compare the measured and calculated (using the Cockcroft-Gault equation) CrCl. The average measured CrCl was 93 ml/min (95% CI, 89-96 ml/min), and the average calculated CrCl was 107 ml/min (95% CI, 102-112 ml/min). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was 0.49 (P<0.0001) between the measured and calculated CrCl. The average MTX dose determined using measured CrCl was 14.1 g (95% CI, 13.6-14.5 g), and the average MTX dose determined using calculated CrCl was 14.7 g (95% CI, 14.2-15.1 g). MTX doses based on measured and calculated CrCl were significantly correlated (r=0.72, P<0.0001). Of the 256 HDMTX treatments evaluated, 158 (62%) had reliable 48 h serum MTX levels documented. Forty-seven levels (30%) were within target range (0.3-1 micromol/l), 99 levels (62%) were below target range (<0.3 micromol/l), 12 levels (8%) were in the range associated with mild toxicity range (>1-3 micromol/l), and no levels were in the range associated with severe toxicity (>3 micromol/l). Of these 158 treatments, the use of a calculated rather than measured CrCl would have yielded an identical MTX dose for 48 treatments (30%), a higher MTX dose for 62 treatments (40%), and a lower MTX dose for 48 treatments (30%). This distribution was not significantly different among the subsets of below target, within target range, and above target MTX levels (P=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with PCNSL, there is significant correlation between the calculated and measured CrCl. MTX doses determined using calculated and measured CrCl are not significantly different. For these patients, there is no clear association between the method of determining CrCl and serum MTX levels. As a result, calculated CrCl is a reasonable alternative to measured CrCl in this patient population and would avoid the inconvenience and potential inaccuracies associated with measured CrCl.

Green urine in a critically ill patient.

The development of discolored urine in the critically ill patient, although uncommon, may have many possible causes, with the most likely source related to medication administration. Studies were undertaken in a 39-year-old man who developed dark green urine while in the intensive care unit for neutropenic sepsis. Although the patient had developed prior nonoliguric renal failure stemming from his sepsis, his renal function at the time of presentation of urine discoloration was considered normal. Review of his medications and intravenous infusions suggested the most likely cause was the food dye placed in his enteral tube feedings. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the urine confirmed the presence of Food Dye and Color Blue Number 1 (FD&C Blue No. 1). This case shows that significant gastrointestinal absorption of FD&C Blue No. 1 can occur. FD&C Blue No. 1 should be considered in the differential diagnosis of dark green discolored urine.