Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
J Biomed Mater Res ; 25(1): 117-28, 1991 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2019608

ABSTRACT

The effects of massive administration of bioactive ceramic powder (Bioglass (45S5), Ceravital (KGS), apatite-wollastnite containing glass ceramics (A-W GC), and hydroxyapatite (HA], by intraperitoneal (IP), intramuscular (IM), or subcutaneous (SC) injection in Balb/c mice were examined in this investigation. Alumina, Silica Glass (SG), and A-W-Al (containing the same amount of crystal as A-W GC and 6.3% Alumina) were used as nonbioactive controls. The particle size of each material injected was smaller than 44 microns. In addition to the above, two more sizes (smaller than 105 microns and smaller than 255 microns) of A-W GC powder, and a 1 x 1 x 0.2 cm plate of the A-W GC were also evaluated. When the particle size was smaller than 44 microns, intraperitoneal injections of 5 mg per g of body weight of BG, KGS, A-W GC, and A-W-Al were lethal to the mice. Ceramics in fine powder form, which are generally believed to have higher bioactivity, are associated with higher mortality except A-W-Al. On the other hand, when the particle size of the ceramic was increased, the fatal effects of ceramic powders in mice decreased. Plate form of ceramics implanted I.P. had no systemic effects. Intramuscular or SC injections of bioactive ceramic powder with a particle size smaller than 44 microns had almost no systemic effects. Both the particle size of the ceramic powder and the route of administration influenced the reactivity of the bioactive ceramics in the mice. In conclusion, regardless of particle size, neither SC nor IM injection of large doses of highly bioactive ceramics had an adverse effect on the host (mouse).


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials/administration & dosage , Ceramics/administration & dosage , Animals , Biocompatible Materials/pharmacokinetics , Biocompatible Materials/toxicity , Ceramics/pharmacokinetics , Ceramics/toxicity , Injections , Materials Testing , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Particle Size , Prostheses and Implants , Tissue Distribution
2.
Hum Toxicol ; 7(2): 133-9, 1988 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3378801

ABSTRACT

Ceramic and non-ceramic forms of uranium dioxide, produced industrially, were administered to rats either by inhalation or as an aqueous suspension which was injected directly into the pulmonary region of the lungs. The results showed that: 1 both materials should be assigned to inhalation class Y as defined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection; 2 whilst the translocation of uranium to the blood for the non-ceramic UO2 was about twice that obtained for the ceramic form, the two dioxides were unlikely to be differentiated on the basis of their lung retention kinetics; 3 the distribution of uranium amongst body tissues and the relationship between systemic content and cumulative urinary excretion indicated that it was transported in the hexavalent form; 4 in addition to air sampling procedures, lung radioactivity counting measurements could be used to advantage for assessing occupational exposures; 5 the exposure limits should be based on radiation dose rather than chemical toxicity.


Subject(s)
Ceramics/pharmacokinetics , Lung/metabolism , Uranium Compounds , Uranium/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Inhalation , Animals , Ceramics/administration & dosage , Environmental Exposure , Female , Humans , Kidney/metabolism , Muscles/metabolism , Rats , Tissue Distribution , Uranium/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL