Decompressive Craniectomy for Hemispheric Infarction in a Low-Income Population.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a worldwide leading cause of mortality and disability, and there are substantial economic costs for poststroke care. Disadvantaged populations show increased incidence, severity, and unfavorable outcomes. This study aimed to report the survival, functional outcome, and caregiver satisfaction of low-income patients diagnosed with a large hemispheric infarction (LHI) who underwent decompressive craniectomy (DC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in consecutive adult patients with an LHI who underwent DC at a single center between October 2015 and September 2019. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic data were reviewed. The primary outcomes were 1-year survival and favorable functional outcome. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included; those <60 years of age showed a higher proportion of favorable functional outcomes (76% vs. 33%; P = 0.031) but similar survival (52% vs. 56%; P = 0.645) than older patients, respectively. Performing the craniectomy in <48 hours from stroke onset compared with ≥48 hours showed no statistically significant differences in survival (59% vs. 46%; P = 0.352) and favorable functional outcomes (56% vs. 70%; P = 0.683), respectively. In retrospective thinking, 79% of caregivers would decide to perform the surgery again. CONCLUSIONS: Age group and time from stroke onset to craniectomy were not associated with survival; notwithstanding, a higher proportion of patients <60 years of age were associated with a favorable functional outcome compared with older patients. Additionally, if given the option, most caregivers would decide to perform the surgery again, independently of the grade of disability of the patient.

[Application of lean management in cost control of cerebral infarction single disease in stroke center].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of lean management on cost control of single disease in patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI) in stroke center. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted. The patients with ACI who underwent intravenous thrombolysis in the stroke center of Taizhou Central Hospital in Zhejiang Province were enrolled. Thirty patients adopted traditional management procedures from July 2016 to September 2017 were enrolled in the control group, and 32 patients received lean management from October 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled in the lean group. The patients in the control group were treated with traditional intravenous thrombolysis, and the patients were sent to the neurology ward for intravenous thrombolysis. The patients in the lean group applied lean management value stream to optimize process management, the lean management team of the stroke center was established, and the green channel for stroke treatment was established to eliminate the waiting time as far as possible. The location of thrombolysis was changed from neurology ward to the neurological intensive care unit (NICU) in emergency department. The patients in the two groups were compared in terms of intravenous thrombolytic door-to-needle time (DNT), admission time to the neurologist's visit time (T1), CT examination time to neurology ward or NICU admission time (T2), neurology ward/NICU visit time to medication time (T3), and the proportion of patients with DNT controlled within 40 minutes, recovery of neurological impairment 7 days after thrombolysis [national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) score], activity of daily living assessment (Barthel index), length of hospital stay, cost of hospital stay and patient satisfaction. At the same time, the main process quality and the implementation rate of easily missed indexes of cerebral infarction single disease were recorded. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, DNT, T1 and T2 in the lean group were significantly shortened [DNT (minutes): 39.56±11.12 vs. 63.03±19.63, T1 (minutes): 16.23±6.79 vs. 33.48±12.63, T2 (minutes): 13.45±3.84 vs. 17.47±5.56, all P < 0.01], T3 was slightly shortened (minutes: 9.88±1.95 vs. 10.95±2.69, P > 0.05), and the proportion of DNT control within 40 minutes was significantly increased [75.0% (24/32) vs. 16.7% (5/30), P < 0.01], the 7-day NIHSS score was decreased significantly (8.66±4.12 vs. 13.00±5.63, P < 0.01), 7-day Barthel index was increased significantly (71.6±16.7 vs. 54.7±17.1, P < 0.01), the length of hospital stay was significantly shortened (days: 9.69±4.06 vs. 12.47±3.83, P < 0.01), the hospital costs were significantly reduced (Yuan: 16 338±5 481 vs. 19 470±5 495, P < 0.05), the satisfaction of patients was improved significantly [(91.38±2.69)% vs. (86.53±2.78)%, P < 0.01]. In terms of the implementation rate of quality indicators such as pre-application evaluation of thrombolytic drugs, evaluation of dysphagia, and evaluation of vascular function, health education of ACI, rehabilitation evaluation and implementation within 24 hours, etc., the lean group was significantly improved as compared with the control group [(87.5% (28/32) vs. 53.3% (16/30), 96.9% (31/32) vs. 73.3% (22/30), 78.1% (25/32) vs. 43.3% (13/30), 100.0% (32/32) vs. 76.7% (23/30), 75.0% (24/32) vs. 33.3% (10/30), all P < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: Lean thinking can realize the standardization of stroke center process, effectively utilize medical resources, improve medical quality and reduce the cost of cerebral infarction single disease.

Effect of an Integrated Payment System on the Direct Economic Burden and Readmission of Rural Cerebral Infarction Inpatients: Evidence from Anhui, China.

Rural China is piloting an integrated payment system, which prepays a budget to a medical alliance rather than a single hospital. This study aims to evaluate the effect of this reform on the direct economic burden and readmission rates of cerebral infarction inpatients. The settlement records of 78,494 cerebral infarction inpatients were obtained from the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS) database in Dingyuan and Funan Counties in the Anhui Province. The direct economic burden was estimated by total costs, out-of-pocket expenditures, the out-of-pocket ratio, and the compensation ratio of the NRCMS. Generalized additive models and multivariable linear/logistic regression were applied to measure the changes of the dependent variables along with the year. Within the county, the total costs positively correlated to the year (ß = 313.10 in 2015; 163.06 in 2016). The out-of-pocket expenditures, out-of-pocket ratios, and the length-of-stay positively correlated to the year in 2015 (ß = 105.10, 0.01, and 0.18 respectively), and negatively correlated to the year in 2016 (ß = -58.40, -0.03, and -0.30, respectively). The odds ratios of the readmission rates were less than one within the county (0.70 in 2015; 0.53 in 2016). The integrated payment system in the Anhui Province has considerably reduced the direct economic burden for the rural cerebral infarction inpatients, and the readmission rate has decreased within the county. Inpatients' health outcomes should be given further attention, and the long-term effect of this reform model awaits further evaluation.

Study on essential drug use status and its influencing factors among cerebral infarction inpatients in county level hospitals of Anhui Province, China.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drug costs is one of the main components of hospitalization expenditure for cerebral infarction inpatients. In China, the National Essential Medicine System (NEMS) was created to relieve the heavy drug-cost burden for patients. The objective of this study was to investigate essential drug-use status and its influencing factors among cerebral infarction inpatients in county-level hospitals of Anhui province, China. METHODS: Three county-level hospitals were selected through a multi-stage cluster random sampling method. The hospitalization cost data of cerebral infarction inpatients in the three hospitals were extracted from the Anhui provincial information platform of the New Rural Cooperative Insurance System (NCMS), and whether the proportion of essential drug cost in the total drug cost reached the median value of 33.05% which was set as the evaluation index for essential drug-use status. Questionnaires for hospitals and physicians were designed and given to them to assess influencing factors. RESULTS: We retrieved the cost data of 2,189 inpatients from the NCMS platform and investigated 51 corresponding physicians in total. The drug costs accounted for 52.6% of the total hospitalization cost, and essential drug costs alone accounted for 37.0% of the total drug costs. The essential drug-cost proportion was high among physicians with a higher recognition degree on NEMS, older age, lower final academic degree, longer work experience and lower professional title. Married physicians and those with tight organizational affiliation also prescribed more essential drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the proportion of essential drugs was an effective way to reduce the disease burden for cerebral infarction patients. Perfecting the NEMS, increasing government investment, reinforcing education and propaganda, and formulating relevant incentive and restrictive mechanisms were all effective ways to promote and increase the number of essential drug prescriptions written by physicians.

Dump the pump: manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) with a syringe is technically effective, expeditious, and cost-efficient.

INTRODUCTION: Syringe aspiration for manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) is a cost- and time-efficient alternative to an aspiration pump with likely similar efficacy. It is counterintuitive to expect the pump to perform better than direct vacuum with a syringe, as the pump must deliver vacuum additionally through a canister and meters of tubing. OBJECTIVE: To present in vitro and clinical results of MAT with a syringe. METHODS: An in vitro analysis was performed comparing vacuum pressures generated by syringe aspiration and with pump aspiration. This was then complemented with prospective clinical data providing details of angiographic and clinical outcomes for syringe MAT. RESULTS: The in vitro analysis demonstrated that equal to slightly greater vacuum pressures were generated by a 60 cc syringe as compared with the pump in both static and partial flow conditions. In our clinical series, 106/113 acute stroke thrombectomies over a 6-month period were performed with syringe MAT on the first pass. Syringe usage instead of pump tubing and a canister led to a total savings of $58 300. The rate of Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3 recanalization was 93%. Adjunctive stentriever usage was performed in 23% of cases. Median puncture to reperfusion time was 25 min; mean change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours was an improvement of 5.1 (median 6). The in-hospital mortality rate was 10%. Seventy percent of patients were discharged to home (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2) or a rehabilitation facility (mRS score 2-4). CONCLUSION: MAT using a syringe is a safe, fast, and more cost-effective approach than using an aspiration pump.

Cost-effectiveness of an insertable cardiac monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Documentation of atrial fibrillation is required to initiate oral anticoagulation therapy for recurrent stroke prevention. Atrial fibrillation often goes undetected with traditional electrocardiogram monitoring techniques. We evaluated whether atrial fibrillation detection using continuous long-term monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor is cost-effective for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke, in comparison to the standard of care. METHODS: A lifetime Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of insertable cardiac monitors from a UK National Health Service perspective using data from the randomized CRYSTAL-AF trial and other published literature. We also conducted scenario analyses (CHADS2 score) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. All costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5%. RESULTS: Monitoring cryptogenic stroke patients with an insertable cardiac monitor was associated with fewer recurrent strokes and increased quality-adjusted life years compared to the standard of care (7.37 vs 7.22). Stroke-related costs were reduced in insertable cardiac monitor patients, but overall costs remained higher than the standard of care (£19,631 vs £17,045). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £17,175 per quality-adjusted life years gained, compared to standard of care in the base-case scenario, which is below established quality-adjusted life years willingness-to-pay thresholds. When warfarin replaced non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants as the main anticoagulation therapy, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £13,296 per quality-adjusted life years gained. CONCLUSION: Insertable cardiac monitors are a cost-effective diagnostic tool for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke. The cost-effectiveness results have relevance for the UK and across value-based healthcare systems that assess costs relative to outcomes.

Individual and Regional-level Factors Contributing to Variation in Length of Stay After Cerebral Infarction in Six European Countries.

Using patient-level data for cerebral infarction cases in 2007, gathered from Finland, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Scotland and Sweden, we studied the variation in risk-adjusted length of stay (LoS) of acute hospital care and 1-year mortality, both within and between countries. In addition, we analysed the variance of LoS and associations of selected regional-level factors with LoS and 1-year mortality after cerebral infarction. The data show that LoS distributions are surprisingly different across countries and that there is significant deviation in the risk-adjusted regional-level LoS in all of the countries studied. We used negative binomial regression to model the individual-level LoS, and random intercept models and ordinary least squares regression for the regional-level analysis of risk-adjusted LoS, variance of LoS, 1-year risk-adjusted mortality and crude mortality for a period of 31-365 days. The observed variations between regions and countries in both LoS and mortality were not fully explained by either patient-level or regional-level factors. The results indicate that there may exist potential for efficiency gains in acute hospital care of cerebral infarction and that healthcare managers could learn from best practices.

Stenting versus endarterectomy and the impact of ultra-early revascularization for emergent admissions of carotid artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The factors influencing outcomes after emergent admission for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis treated with revascularization by endarterectomy or stenting are yet to be fully elucidated. METHODS: We analyzed revascularization of carotid artery stenosis for patients admitted emergently using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2008-2011). Admission characteristics, economic measures, in-hospital mortality, and iatrogenic stroke were compared between (1) endarterectomy and stenting, (2) patients with and without cerebral infarction, and (3) ultra-early (within 48 hours of admission) and deferred (up to 2 weeks) intervention. RESULTS: 72,797 admissions meeting our inclusion criteria were identified. Factors associated with ultra-early revascularization were male patients, low comorbidity burden, stenosis without infarction, and stenting. Ultra-early intervention significantly decreased cost and length of stay, and stenting for patients without infarction decreased length of stay but increased cost. Patients without infarction treated within 48 hours had significantly lower mortality and iatrogenic stroke rate. Patients with infarction receiving ultra-early revascularization had increased odds of mortality and iatrogenic stroke in comparison with the deferred group. Patients with infarction receiving stenting experienced increased odds of mortality in comparison with those receiving endarterectomy, but there was no significant difference in iatrogenic stroke rate. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) administration on the day of revascularization greatly increased the odds of iatrogenic stroke and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Larger prospectively randomized trials evaluating the optimum timing of revascularization after emergent admission of carotid artery stenosis seem warranted.

[Quality parameters in the treatment of acute stroke: comparison of various regional treatment concepts]. / Qualitätsparameter der akuten Schlaganfallversorgung: Gegenüberstellung unterschiedlicher regionaler Versorgungskonzepte.

BACKGROUND: The long-term prognosis of stroke patients is still dependent in particular on the timing of a correct diagnosis, immediate initiation of a suitable specific therapy and competent treatment in a stroke unit. Therefore, nationwide attempts are being made to establish a comprehensive coverage of the necessary specific competence and infrastructural requirements. Divergent regional circumstances and economic viewpoints determine the characteristics of the various healthcare concepts and the interplay between participating cooperation partners. This article compares the development with respect to three qualitative treatment parameters exemplified by four regional healthcare models during the time period 2008-2011. METHODS: The hospitalization rates for patients with transitory ischemic attacks, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, the case numbers for stoke unit treatment and the rates of systemic thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in the regions of Berlin, the Ruhr Area, Ostwestfalen-Lippe and southeast Bayern (TEMPiS) are presented based on the data from the DRG statistical reports for the years 2008 and 2011. RESULTS: The average hospitalization rates for ischemic stroke patients (brain infarct ICD 163) in the time period from 2008 to 2011 were 294 per 100,000 inhabitants for the Ruhr Area, 257 per 100,000 inhabitants for Ostwestfalen-Lippe and 265 per 100,000 inhabitants each for Berlin and southeast Bayern. The complex stroke treatment quota for southeast Bayern in 2008 was 31 % and 47 % in 2011 and the respective quotas for the other regions studied were 42-44 % and 58-59 %. The rate of systemic thrombolysis in 2008 ranged between 4.2 % and 7.4 % and in 2011 the increase in the range for the 4 regions studied was between 41 % and 145 %. In 2011 the thrombectomy quota of 2 % in the Ruhr Area was the only one which was above the national average of 1.3 % of all brain infarcts. DISCUSSION: Stroke is a common disease in the four regions studied. For the established forms of therapy, complex treatment of stroke and systemic thrombolysis, the positive effect of structurally improved approaches in the four different regional treatment concepts could be confirmed during the course of the observational time period selected. Mechanical thrombectomy which is currently still considered to be an individual healing attempt, was used significantly more often in the Ruhr Area in 2011 than in the other three regions studied. A standardized referral procedure had previously been established in the metropolitan regions.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the neuroprotective agent edaravone for noncardioembolic cerebral infarction.

BACKGROUND: The free radical scavenger edaravone has been reported useful for improvement in activities of daily living and for prevention of recurrent stroke in the edaravone versus sodium ozagrel in acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (EDO) trial. The aim of this report was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of edaravone compared to the intravenous antiplatelet drug ozagrel sodium (ozagrel) for noncardioembolic stroke (non-CES) based on the EDO trial data. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the Markov model, which also incorporated the long-term course after the acute stage of non-CES. From the perspective of a health care payer, direct medical costs and nursing care costs were taken into account in the cost analysis. The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) served as an indicator of effectiveness. Simulation at 5 and 10 years after the onset of non-CES was carried out. The study involved 68-year-old patients with non-CES, selected against the EDO trial subject selection criteria. A 14-day treatment with edaravone 60 mg/day or ozagrel 160 mg/day was assumed as acute treatment for non-CES. RESULTS: The use of edaravone was associated with a reduction in total costs (0.51 million yen [$6,374] at 5 years and 0.64 million yen [$8,039]) at 10 years after the onset of non-CES) and improvement in QALYs (0.23 at 5 years and 0.38 at 10 years). Compared to ozagrel therapy, edaravone therapy was a cost-saving strategy for treating non-CES. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to ozagrel therapy, edaravone therapy for non-CES is not only useful from a clinical viewpoint, but also valuable from a socioeconomic perspective.

Neurocritical care in developing countries.

Neurocritical illness heavily burdens the developing world. In spite of a lack of resources for population-based health in most developing countries, there is an increasing demand for resource-intense strategies for acute neurological care. Factors including rising individual incomes in emerging economies, need for neurointensive care in humanitarian emergencies, growth of private hospitals, the rising burden of noncommunicable disease, and the practice of neurocritical care by specialists outside of neurology are discussed. Possible steps to improve the global practice of neurocritical care include: (1) emphasis on prevention of neurocritical illness through traffic safety and adequate outpatient treatment; (2) standardization of training requirements and skill sets; (3) guidelines on cost-effective measures including medications, equipment, and devices; (4) strengthening of surveillance systems and registries for both noncommunicable and communicable neurological diseases; (5) expanded use of teleneurology; (6) educational exchanges of neurointensive health care workers; and (7) monitoring of neurological intensive care unit death rates due to nosocomial infections, neurological disease, and other causes. A summary of reported mortality rates among neurocritically ill patients in African countries in recent years is provided as an illustrative example.

[Medico-economic assessment of the Pontoise Hospital stroke unit]. / Évaluation médico-économique de l'unité neurovasculaire du centre hospitalier de Pontoise.

INTRODUCTION: Annually, approximately 120,000 people in France have a stroke. Various controlled studies have pointed out the benefits of treatment in a stroke unit (SU). The objective of this study was to evaluate, from a medical point of view, the economic impact of the Pontoise Hospital SU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on the national cost study (NCS [étude nationale des coûts: ENC]) we analyzed data of five diagnosis related groups (DRG) which have a principle diagnosis in relation with stroke. This work was limited to strokes and transient ischemic events in adults and excluded sub-arachnoid hemorrhage. Medical and economic parameters were collected over the period from January to October 2006 and compared with those of the same period in 2005, that is to say before the opening of the SU. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-three hospital stays occurred between January 1st and October 31st, 2006 and 216 during the same time period before the opening of the SU, an increase of approximately 50% of all stroke-related admissions in our hospital. The number of stays carried out in the neurology unit increased by 29%. There was no significant difference between the two periods regarding age (median 69 versus 70 years) and sex- ratio. Average length of stay (ALS) was the same (9 days). There were no significant differences concerning the death rate (5.6% versus 6.2%) and that of discharge to home (44.6% versus 44.4%). The cost by stay in 2006 was 3534 euros [median; min 664-max 57,542] versus 3541 euros in 2005 [681-35,149] (p=0.57). Analysis by DRG highlighted an increase in the cost for serious strokes, cerebral infarctions and hemorrhages. For transitory ischemic events, the cost and the ALS decreased. CONCLUSION: After the opening of the SU, there was an increase in the activity without an increase in the total cost. This could be related in part to the limited means allocated to the stroke unit at its opening (in particular medical staff). The NCS can be used to evaluate the activity of a stroke unit. This work could be completed on a larger number of units or in several units of different size.

Evaluation of admission characteristics, hospital length of stay and costs for cerebral infarction in a medium-sized city in China.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke is a heavy economic and health burden for the patients and society. This study aimed to evaluate hospital length of stay (LOS) by admission characteristics and costs correlated with medical insurance status for cerebral infarction in a medium-sized city in China. METHODS: A total of 557 consecutive patients with principal diagnosis of cerebral infarction were enrolled. Admission characteristics, LOS, and costs were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The mean LOS was 18.5 days (median, 16 days). Our analysis demonstrated that medical insurance status, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, Functional Independence Measure cognitive and motor score, Glasgow coma scale), Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) classification, some comorbidities (coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hyperlipemia), and raised leukocytes were the main explanatory factors for LOS by stepwise multiple regression model. The mean per patient costs were US $983.0, and mean daily costs US $67.0. Drugs were the most expensive cost subtype, all subtypes costs except non-medical care were significantly higher in patients with state medicine than in those with new cooperative medical scheme (NCMS) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stroke severity, OCSP classification, raised leukocytes on admission, some comorbidities, and medical insurance status may help to predict LOS for patients with cerebral infarction. Healthcare expenditures were heavy burdens to inhabitants. State medicine patients could shorten unnecessary LOS to improve the resources allocation and cost-efficiency.

[Billing based on a case-based lump sum for stroke. Did this lead to discharge of patients in a worse clinical condition?]. / Abrechnung mittels Fallpauschalen beim Hirninfarkt. Führte dies zu Entlassungen in klinisch schlechterem Zustand?

BACKGROUND: It has been supposed that the introduction of a new inpatient reimbursement system starting in 2004 in Germany using the German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) may lead to false incentives with encouragement of premature hospital discharge of patients. Exploring a large database on stroke patients, we addressed the question whether length of stay (LOS) and discharge in more severe condition were associated with the introduction of the G-DRG. We further examined other factors with probable effect on LOS such as variations of patient characteristics and treatment during the observation period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All stroke patients treated in 2003-2006 in the German state of Hesse (6,100,000 inhabitants) were assessed with respect to stroke severity, symptoms on admission and discharge, LOS and stroke-related deficits on discharge. We compared LOS and outcome in 2003 (before introduction of the G-DRG) with 2004 when the G-DRG had recently been introduced and with 2006 when the G-DRG was already well established in the clinical routine. The effects of LOS and treatment year on outcome were assessed using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: During the observation period, we evaluated 37,396 stroke patients. The length of stay was reduced significantly from 12.2 to 10.4 days (p<0.001). Both severity of stroke on admission and outcome on discharge decreased during the observation period. A multivariate analysis revealed a minor but significant association [odds ratio (OR): 1.020 per day of hospital treatment; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.016-1.024] of LOS on outcome. Treatment in 2006 compared to 2003 led to good outcome with an OR of 1.378 (95% CI: 1.279-1.485). Subgroup analysis limited to patients with severe stroke revealed that LOS was significantly lower in 2006 compared to 2003 also in this patient subgroup; moreover, the proportion of patients discharged with severe outcome was lower in 2006 compared to 2003. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a significant reduction of LOS during the years after introduction of the G-DRG. However, reduction of LOS was not associated with more severe outcome on discharge, possibly due to changes in stroke treatment implemented during the observational period. Our results do not support the conjecture that changes in the reimbursement system were associated with compromised patient care.

[Telemedicine in acute stroke care--a health economics view]. / Telemedizin in der Schlaganfall-Akutversorgung--eine gesundheitsökonomische Bestandsaufnahme.

Specialized stroke units offer optimal treatment of patients with an acute stroke. Unfortunately, their installation is limited by an acute lack of experienced neurologists and the small number of stroke patients in sparsely populated rural areas. This problem is increasingly being solved by the use of telemedicine, so that neurological expertise is made available to basic and regular care. It has been demonstrated by national and international pilot studies that solidly based and rapid decisions can be made by telemedicine regrading the use of thrombolysis, as the most important acute treatment, but also of other interventions. So far studies have only evaluated improvement in the quality of care achieved by networking, but not of any lasting effect on any economic benefit. Complementary to a medical evaluation, the qualitative economic assessment presented here of German and American concepts of telemetric care indicate no difference in efficacy between various ways of networking. Most noteworthy, when comparing two large American and German studies, is the difference in their priorities. While the American networks achieved targeted improvements in efficacy of care that go beyond the immediate wishes of the doctors involved, this was of only secondary importance in the German studies. Also, in contrast to several American networks, the German telemetry networks have not tended to be organized for future growth. In terms of economic benefits, decentralized organized networks offer a greater potential of efficacy than purely local ones. Furthermore, the integration of inducements into the design of business models is a fundamental factor for achieving successful and lasting existence, especially within a highly competitive market.

[Economic loss of nosocomial infections in patients with cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic loss of nosocomial infections (NI) in patients with cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction. METHODS: We used case-control method to compare the medical expenses between 46 pairs of cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction patients with or without NI. RESULTS: The median hospital stay, total treatment expense, medications expense, examination expense, and treatment expense of NI were significantly higher in the NI group than in non-NI group (all P < 0.01 ). CONCLUSIONS: NI can prolong hospital stay and increase medical expenses of patients with cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction. Effective measures should be taken to control NI.

Management patterns and healthcare costs for hospitalized patients with cerebral infarction.

OBJECTIVES: Although evidence shows the importance of specialized intensive care of patients with cerebral infarction, it is not well known whether resources are generously applied in the initial period and how patterns of medical resource utilization are associated with characteristics of providers and patient outcomes. In this study, we analyzed changing patterns of daily medical cost using administrative healthcare claim data and identified a management pattern in each case. METHODS: We used Japan's administrative data to identify medical costs on a day-to-day basis. Data of 3136 patients with acute cerebral infarction from 14 medical institutions were included in the analyses. Using the data, we calculated the costs from the perspective of the third-party payer. Institutions were divided into three groups according to the distribution of medical costs in the first 2 days, and patient background, treatment process, and outcomes were compared across the groups. RESULTS: Medical cost was not necessarily intensively allocated during the early hospitalization period. Wide variations were observed in medical cost utilization patterns across institutions. The differences in medical cost for the initial hospitalization period appears to be more influenced by ICU utilization and management policies of institutions than the clinical condition of patients. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a methodology that uses administrative claim data to examine management patterns of ischemic stroke. We believe that the use of our method, in conjunction with accurate and detailed clinical data, can help elucidate the relationship among acute-period medical resource utilization, process of care, and patient outcomes.

CT angiography is cost-effective for confirmation of internal carotid artery occlusions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: While sensitive to internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion, carotid ultrasound can produce false-positive results. CT angiography (CTA) has a high specificity for ICA occlusion and is safer and cheaper than catheter angiography, although less accurate. We determined the cost-effectiveness of CTA versus catheter angiography for confirming an ICA occlusion first suggested by carotid ultrasound. METHODS: A Markov decision-analytic model was constructed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CTA compared with catheter angiography in a hypothetical cohort of symptomatic patients with a screening examination consistent with an ICA occlusion. Costs in 2004 dollars were estimated from Medicare reimbursement. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS: The 2-year cost in the CTA scenario was $9,178, and for catheter angiography, $11,531, consistent with a $2,353 cost-savings per person for CTA. CTA resulted in accrual of 1.83 quality-adjusted life years while catheter angiography resulted in 1.82 quality-adjusted life years. CTA was less costly and marginally more effective than catheter angiography. In sensitivity analyses, when CTA sensitivity and specificity were allowed to vary across a plausible range, CTA remained cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: After screening examination has suggested an ICA occlusion, confirmatory testing with CTA provides similar effectiveness to catheter angiography and is less costly.

[Incremental cost-effectiveness of dipyridamole + acetylsalicylic acid in secondary prevention of ischemic noncardioembolic stroke]. / Inkrementelle Kosteneffektivität von Dipyridamol + Acetylsalicylsäure in der Sekundärprävention bei ischämischem nichtkardioembolischem Schlaganfall.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of secondary prevention in stroke is to avoid restrokes. The current standard treatment in Germany is a lifelong therapy with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). As the incidence of restrokes remains relatively high from a health-care payer's perspective, the question arises, whether the combination of dipyridamole + acetylsalicylic acid (Dip + ASA) is cost-effective in comparison with a therapy based on ASA only. METHODS: A decision-analytic cross-sectional epidemiologic steady-state model of the German population compares the effects of two strategies of secondary prevention with Dip + ASA (12 months vs. open end) and with ASA monotherapy. RESULTS: The model predicts the following estimates: the annual incidence of initial ischemic strokes in Germany is estimated at 130,000 plus an extra 34,000 restrokes (base year 2005). Additionally, there are 580,000 people that experienced a stroke > 12 months earlier, of whom 135,000 had a restroke. Every year, nearly 89,000 Germans die of the consequences of an ischemic stroke. If Dip + ASA would have been the standard therapy in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, an additional 7,500 persons could have been saved in 2005. Statutory health insurance would have to spend 33,000 Euro for every additional life year gained with Dip + ASA as secondary prevention strategy. If secondary prevention with Dip + ASA would be limited to the first 12 months after an initial stroke, which is the time of the highest risk for a restroke, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is about 7,000 Euro per life year gained. The results proved to be robust in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Secondary prevention with Dip + ASA is cost-effective in comparison to treatment with ASA in monotherapy, because its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is within common ranges of social willingness to pay. From the standpoint of the patient as well as the health-care payer, focusing on the first 12 months after the initial incident for intensified preventive drug treatment with Dip + ASA should be valuable from a medical as well as a health-economic perspective.

[Carotid surgery in regional anesthesia--anesthesiological, neurological and surgical aspects]. / Die Chirurgie der A. carotis in Regionalanästhesie--anästhesiologische, neurologische, chirurgische und ökonomische Aspekte.

Surgery of the carotid artery is justified only if it is performed with low complication rates. The essential advantages of regional anesthesia in comparison to general anesthesia are a secure neuromonitoring, hemodynamic stability and prolonged analgesia. Regional anesthesia for carotid surgery, which is described methodically in this paper, needs only a minor expenditure. Our own data show that patients with a contralateral occlusion of the internal carotid artery and patients with a high risk for surgery (ASA IV) are at a high risk for neurological events during carotid crossclamping. Consequences of regional anesthesia on the surgical procedure are to ignore. The question, whether economic advantages exist for regional anesthesia, cannot yet be answered.