Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 894
Filter
2.
Cancer Radiother ; 26(1-2): 14-19, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953695

ABSTRACT

The French sanitary and regulatory context in which radiotherapy centres are comprised is evolving. Risk and quality management systems are currently adapting to these evolutions. The French nuclear safety agency (ASN) decision of July 1st 2008 on quality assurance obligations in radiotherapy has reached 10 years of age, and the French high authority of health (HAS) certification system 20 years now. Mandatory tools needed for the improvement of quality and safety in healthcare are now well known. From now on, the focus of healthcare policies is oriented towards evaluation of efficiency of these new organisations designed following ASN and HAS nationwide guidelines.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Oncology/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Clinical Audit/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Audit/methods , France , Humans , Patient Participation/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Improvement/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Oncology/standards , Radiotherapy , Risk Management/methods , Societies, Medical
5.
Med Sci (Paris) ; 37(4): 392-395, 2021 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33908858

ABSTRACT

"In the Republic, it is not allowed to deliver virginity certificates, prior to marriage; in the French Republic, the laws of religion cannot prevail over the laws of the Republic" said President Emmanuel Macron in February 2020. Nevertheless, what about the religious status of these certificates? Why focusing only on virginity certificates without mentioning the concomitant practice of hymen rehabilitation? There is a whole range of revirginization surgical practices, such as nymphoplasty or vaginoplasty, among which hymenoplasty figures only incidentally?


TITLE: Des « certificats de virginité ¼ aux hyménoplasties en France. ABSTRACT: « Dans la République, on ne peut pas exiger des certificats de virginité pour se marier ; dans la République, on ne doit jamais accepter que les lois de la religion puissent être supérieures aux lois de la République ¼, telle est la déclaration en février 2020 du président Emmanuel Macron. Mais quel est donc le statut de ces certificats de virginité, est-il véritablement religieux ? Pourquoi se focaliser sur les « certificats de virginité ¼ sans jamais évoquer la pratique concomitante de la réfection d'hymen ? N'existe-t-il pas une diversité de pratiques chirurgicales participant du processus de revirginisation telle que la nymphoplastie ou la vaginoplastie ; l'hyménoplastie ne serait-elle que la pointe émergée de l'iceberg ?


Subject(s)
Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Hymen/surgery , Islam , Sexual Abstinence , Vagina/surgery , Female , France , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Hymen/anatomy & histology , Marriage/legislation & jurisprudence , Personal Autonomy , Sexism
6.
Nurs Outlook ; 69(4): 617-625, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33593666

ABSTRACT

Starting in 2016, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services implemented the first phase of a 3-year multi-phase plan revising the manner in which nursing homes are regulated. In this revision, attention was placed on the importance of certified nursing assistants (CNAs) to resident care and the need to empower these frontline workers. Phase II mandates that CNAs be included as members of the nursing home interdisciplinary team that develops care plans for the resident that are person-centered and comprehensive and reviews and revises these care plans after each resident assessment. While these efforts are laudable, there are no direct guidelines for how to integrate CNAs in the interdisciplinary team. We recommend the inclusion of direct guidelines, in which this policy revision clarifies the expected contributions from CNAs, their responsibilities, their role as members of the interdisciplinary team, and the expected patterns of communication between CNAs and other members of the interdisciplinary team.


Subject(s)
Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Certification/standards , Homes for the Aged/legislation & jurisprudence , Homes for the Aged/standards , Nursing Assistants/legislation & jurisprudence , Nursing Assistants/standards , Nursing Homes/legislation & jurisprudence , Nursing Homes/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Federal Government , Female , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Male , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/standards , Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicare/standards , Middle Aged , Policy Making , United States
9.
Hum Resour Health ; 18(1): 46, 2020 06 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32586328

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) are widely recognized as essential to addressing disparities in health care delivery and outcomes in US vulnerable populations. In the state of Arizona, the sustainability of the workforce is threatened by low wages, poor job security, and limited opportunities for training and advancement within the profession. CHW voluntary certification offers an avenue to increase the recognition, compensation, training, and standardization of the workforce. However, passing voluntary certification legislation in an anti-regulatory state such as Arizona posed a major challenge that required a robust advocacy effort. CASE PRESENTATION: In this article, we describe the process of unifying the two major CHW workforces in Arizona, promotoras de salud in US-Mexico border communities and community health representatives (CHRs) serving American Indian communities. Differences in the origins, financing, and even language of the population-served contributed to historically divergent interests between CHRs and promotoras. In order to move forward as a collective workforce, it was imperative to integrate the perspectives of CHRs, who have a regular funding stream and work closely through the Indian Health Services, with those of promotoras, who are more likely to be grant-funded in community-based efforts. As a unified workforce, CHWs were better positioned to gain advocacy support from key health care providers and health insurance companies with policy influence. We seek to elucidate the lessons learned in our process that may be relevant to CHWs representing diverse communities across the US and internationally. CONCLUSIONS: Legislated voluntary certification provides a pathway for further professionalization of the CHW workforce by establishing a standard definition and set of core competencies. Voluntary certification also provides guidance to organizations in developing appropriate training and job activities, as well as ongoing professional development opportunities. In developing certification with CHWs representing different populations, and in particular Tribal Nations, it is essential to assure that the CHW definition is in alignment with all groups and that the scope of practice reflects CHW roles in both clinic and community-based settings. The Arizona experience underscores the benefits of a flexible approach that leverages existing strengths in organizations and the population served.


Subject(s)
Certification/standards , Community Health Workers/organization & administration , Health Services, Indigenous/organization & administration , Arizona , Capacity Building/organization & administration , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Community Health Workers/economics , Community Health Workers/legislation & jurisprudence , Community Health Workers/standards , Decision Making , Health Policy , Health Services, Indigenous/economics , Humans , Mexico , Organizational Case Studies , Workforce/organization & administration
10.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0233237, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32433702

ABSTRACT

Alongside government driven management initiatives to achieve sustainable fisheries management, there remains a role for market-based mechanisms to improve fisheries outcomes. Market-based mechanisms are intended to create positive economic incentives that improve the status and management of fisheries. Research to understand consumer demand for certified fish is central but needs to be mirrored by supply side understanding including why fisheries decide to gain or retain certification and the impact of certification on them and other stakeholders involved. We apply semi-structured interviews in seven different Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certified fisheries that operate in (or from) Western Australia with the aim of better understanding fisheries sector participation in certification schemes (the supply side) and the impacts and unintended benefits and costs of certification. We find that any positive economic impacts of certification were only realised in a limited number of MSC fisheries in Western Australia, which may be explained by the fact that only a small proportion of Western Australian state-managed fisheries are sold with the MSC label and ex-vessel or consumer market price premiums are therefore mostly not obtained. Positive impacts of certification in these Western Australian fisheries are more of a social and institutional nature, for example, greater social acceptability and increased efficiency in the governance process respectively. However, opinion is divided on whether the combined non-monetary and monetary benefits outweigh the costs.


Subject(s)
Fisheries/legislation & jurisprudence , Seafood/supply & distribution , Sustainable Growth , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Fisheries/economics , Humans , Seafood/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Western Australia
11.
Med Health Care Philos ; 23(3): 445-456, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32388666

ABSTRACT

The relations of power between healthcare-related institutions and the professionals that interact with them are changing. Generally, the institutions are gaining the upper hand. Consequently, the intellectual abilities necessary for professionals to pursue the internal goods of healthcare are changing as well. A concrete case is the struggle over sickness benefits in Sweden, in which the Swedish Social Insurance Agency (SSIA) and physicians are important stakeholders. The SSIA has recently consolidated its power over the sickness certificates that doctors issue for their patients. The result has been a stricter gatekeeping of sickness benefits. In order to combat the inroads made by state institutions into sickness certification, and into the sphere of medical practice, some doctors have developed cunning "techniques" to maximize the chance to have their sickness certificates accepted by the SSIA. This article attempts to demonstrate that cunning intelligence-the ability of the weak to "outsmart" a stronger adversary-plays an important role in the practice of medicine. Cunning intelligence is not merely a defective form of prudence (phronesis), nor is it simply an instance of instrumental reason (techne), but rather an ability that occupies a distinct place among the intellectual abilities generally ascribed to professionals.


Subject(s)
Certification/ethics , Certification/standards , Disability Evaluation , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/ethics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Reasoning , Humans , Physician-Patient Relations , Politics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/legislation & jurisprudence , Sweden
13.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(4): 102459, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32299638

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: 1) Ascertain the status of cannabis legalization by state, 2) Explore the process required to obtain cannabis credentials for both the patient and the physician, 3) Determine the level of interest of otolaryngologists in the medicinal cannabis, and 4) Explore possible research directions into efficacy and potential complications. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHODS: Internet searches were conducted to identify each state's Medical Cannabis Program website. The qualifying conditions, list of approved-practitioners, process required for both practitioners and patients for approval were noted. Lists of approved practitioners were analyzed to determine the prevalence of board-certified otolaryngologists. RESULTS: Of the 33 states that authorize medicinal cannabis, eight provide lists of approved-practitioners, six of which provide specialty information. A total of 24 Otolaryngologists can be found of the 5944 physicians on these six lists. All otolaryngologists were located in highly-populated metropolitan areas with a mean number of 29.9 years in practice. Significant variations exist between each state including legal definitions and qualifying conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of consistent regulation across the country drives uncertainty regarding the adoption of medicinal cannabis. Very few otolaryngologists in the country are registered to certify patients for medical cannabis. While the medicinal use of cannabis may currently have limited applications within otolaryngology, many areas that have yet to be explored.


Subject(s)
Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Marijuana , Otolaryngologists , Drug Approval , Humans , Internet , Otolaryngology , United States
14.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 16(2): 190-194, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31118139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy technicians are vital to the operation of pharmacies, and national pharmacy associations have advocated for mandatory education and training requirements. While these requirements may improve patient safety, there is a risk that laws and regulations which impose substantial education and training requirements on technicians could create barriers to entry which restrict the workforce and increase wages. OBJECTIVE: This study has two objectives: 1) Describe changes in barriers to entry and wages over time; and 2) Evaluate the correlation between changing barriers to entry and pharmacy technician wages. METHODS: Data come from Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment Statistics from 1997 to 2017 and National Association of Boards of Pharmacy Surveys of Pharmacy Law from 1997 to 2014. A barrier to entry was defined as adoption of registration, licensure, or certification. Wage data was adjusted to 2017 dollars using the Consumer Price Index. Ordinary least squares regression evaluated the correlation between the proportion of states which had at least one barrier to entry and wages. An interrupted time series model estimated the impact of adopting a barrier to entry on the trend in technician wages over time. RESULTS: Technician wages increased between 1997 and 2007 but remained flat between 2008 and 2017. A strong correlation was observed between the proportion of states which had at least one barrier to entry and technician wages (R2 = 0.93, p < 0.0001). However, the interrupted time series models did not identify any relationship between adoption of a barrier to entry and the trend in technician wages (p = 0.363). CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests adoption of legal/regulatory barriers to entry did not have a significant influence on the trend in technician wages over time. More research is needed to evaluate the impact of barriers to entry on non-wage practice variables, such as privileges and satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Legislation, Pharmacy , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Technicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/legislation & jurisprudence , Certification/standards , Humans , Pharmacies/standards , Pharmacy/standards , Pharmacy Technicians/standards
15.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 65(2): 238-247, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600026

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Three midwifery credentials are granted in the United States: certified nurse-midwife (CNM), certified midwife (CM), and certified professional midwife (CPM). Confusion about US midwifery credentials may restrict growth of the midwifery profession. This survey assessed American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) members' knowledge of US midwifery credentials. METHODS: ACNM members (N = 7551) were surveyed via email in 2017. The survey asked respondents to report demographic information and to identify correct statements about the education, certification, and scope of practice of CNMs, CMs, and CPMs. Responses to 17 items about all midwives certified in the United States, a 5-item subset specific to CNMs/CMs, and one item related to location of midwifery practice by credential were analyzed. RESULTS: Nearly a quarter of the membership (22.1%) responded to the survey. Higher scores on the survey indicated greater identification of correct statements about the education, certification, scope, and location of practice of CNMs, CMs, and CPMs. Significant differences in scores were found among ACNM members based on their level of education, degree of professional involvement in midwifery, and prior practice as a nurse. ACNM members with higher scores on the survey held a doctorate, worked in Region I, and had greater professional leadership involvement in midwifery organizations. Participants with less nursing experience prior to their midwifery education also scored significantly higher on the survey. DISCUSSION: Although two-thirds of respondents correctly answered items on the preparation, credentialing, and scope of practice of CNMs, CMs, and CPMs, a significant minority had gaps in knowledge. Results of this survey suggest the need for outreach about US midwifery credentials. Future research to replicate and expand upon this survey may benefit the profession of midwifery in the United States.


Subject(s)
Certification/trends , Credentialing/trends , Midwifery/trends , Nurse Midwives/trends , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/trends , Adult , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Credentialing/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform , Humans , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Nurse Midwives/legislation & jurisprudence , Nurse's Role , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/legislation & jurisprudence , Societies, Nursing/trends , United States
16.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law ; 48(1): 65-76, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31753966

ABSTRACT

In March 2015, a co-pilot flying Germanwings Flight 9525 deliberately pointed his airplane into a descent, killing himself, five other crew members, and 144 passengers. Subsequent investigation and review teams examined the incident and considered potential lessons to maximize air safety. In this article, aviation industry clinical leaders, including the U.S. Federal Air Surgeon and Chief Psychiatrist from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), along with a professional pilot and collaborating forensic psychiatrists, discuss suicide-by-plane, evolving themes related to public safety responsibilities for psychiatrists treating pilots, and forensic trends in pilot evaluation for medical certification from an aerospace psychiatric perspective. We explore how psychiatric aspects of pilot fitness and aviation safety are examined across perspectives, including unsafe acts, preconditions, organizational factors, and unsafe supervision. We explore practices for civilian pilots and offer information related to military pilot fitness. Lessons from Germanwings are presented, as is the need for increased support for pilots who might be concerned about revealing mental health challenges for fear of loss of medical certification and pilot employment. The Air Line Pilots Association Pilot Assistance Network is highlighted as one example of pilots supporting pilots to increase airway safety.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Aviation , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Disclosure , Mental Health , Pilots/psychology , Suicide/psychology , Aerospace Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Forensic Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Government Regulation , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Organizational Policy , Psychiatry , United States
18.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc ; 109(S1): 1-4, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31760757

ABSTRACT

The Board of Directors of the American Board of Podiatric Medicine approved the following position statement regarding hospital and surgical privileges for doctors of podiatric medicine on February 27, 2019. This statement is based on federal law, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Conditions of Participation and Standards of the Joint Commission, and takes into account the current education, training, and experience of podiatrists to recommend best practices for hospital credentialing and privileging.


Subject(s)
Certification/standards , Medical Staff Privileges/standards , Podiatry/standards , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Organizational Policy , Podiatry/education , Specialty Boards , United States
19.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 32(6): 876-882, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31704756

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the degree to which the American Board of Family Medicine's certification examination is representative of family physician practice with regard to frequency of diagnoses encounter and the criticality of the diagnoses. METHODS: Data from 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was used to assess the frequency of diagnoses encountered by family physicians nationally. These diagnoses were also rated by a panel of content experts for how critical it was to diagnose and treat the condition correctly and then assign the condition to 1 of the 16 content categories used on the American Board of Family Medicine examination. These ratings of frequency and criticality were used to create 7 different new schemas to compute percentages for the content categories. RESULTS: The content category percentages for the 7 different schemas correlated with the 2006 to 2016 test plan percentages from 0.50 to 0.90 with the frequency conditions being more highly correlated and the criticality conditions being less correlated. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the continued use of the current Family Medicine Certification Examination content specifications as being representative of current family medicine practice; however, small adjustments might be warranted to permit better representation of the criticality of the topics.


Subject(s)
Certification/standards , Clinical Competence/legislation & jurisprudence , Family Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Licensure/standards , Physicians, Family/legislation & jurisprudence , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Licensure/legislation & jurisprudence , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Specialty Boards/legislation & jurisprudence , Specialty Boards/standards , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...