Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.346
Filter
1.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 88(2): e20230229, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39319910

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of intravitreal dexamethasone implant used as either an adjuvant or a switching therapy for diabetic macular edema in patients with poor anatomic response after three consecutive monthly injections of ranibizumab. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with diabetic macular edema who received three consecutive doses of ranibizumab as initial therapy and demonstrated poor response. A single dose of intravitreal de xamethasone implant was administered to these patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment modalities: the adjuvant therapy group, consisting of patients who continued treatment with ranibizumab injection after receiving intravitreal dexamethasone implant, and the switch therapy group, consisting of patients who were switched from ranibizumab treatment to intravitreal dexamethasone implant as needed. The main outcome measurements were best corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: In this study that included 64 eyes of 64 patients, the best corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness values did not significantly differ between the groups at baseline and at 6 months of follow-up (p>0.05). However, at 12 months, the best corrected visual acuity values in the adjuvant and switch therapy groups were 0.46 and 0.35 LogMAR, respectively (p=0.012), and the central retinal thickness values were 344.8 and 270.9, respectively (p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, it seems more reasonable to use intravitreal dexamethasone implant as a switch therapy rather than an adjuvant therapy for diabetic macula edema refractory to ranibizumab despite three consecutive monthly injections of ranibizumab. Patients switched to intravitreal dexamethasone implant were found to have better anatomic and visual outcomes at 12 months than those who continued ranibizumab therapy despite their less-than-optimal responses.


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone , Diabetic Retinopathy , Drug Implants , Glucocorticoids , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema , Ranibizumab , Visual Acuity , Humans , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Ranibizumab/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Aged , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Time Factors , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Drug Substitution
2.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 79: 100469, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39098146

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the changes of C-reactive protein to Albumin Ratio (CAR) levels and Interval Debulking Surgery (IDS) outcome after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) in ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: A nested case-control study for 209 patients with ovarian cancer who received NAC-IDS therapy from the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College between 2015‒2021 was conducted. Demographic data, laboratory indicators, and imaging examinations were collected. The outcome was regarded as optimal IDS in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship of CAR before NAC, CAR after NAC and ∆CAR with optimal IDS. The authors also performed the subgroup analysis based on menopausal state. RESULTS: The end time of follow-up was January 24, 2022. A total of 156 patients had been treated with optimal IDS, and 53 with suboptimal IDS. After adjusting age, body mass index, menopausal state, NAC drug, peritoneal perfusion and CAR before NAC, the result showed that CAR after NAC (Odds Ratio [OR = 3.48], 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI 1.28‒9.48], p = 0.015) and ∆CAR (OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.11‒0.78, p = 0.015) were associated with optimal IDS, respectively. Additionally, the authors found a significant correlation between CAR after NAC and optimal IDS (OR = 3.16, 95% CI 1.07‒9.35, p = 0.038), and ∆CAR and optimal IDS (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.11‒0.94, p = 0.038) among ovarian cancer patients with menopause. CONCLUSION: CAR after NAC and ∆CAR were independent prognostic markers of optimal interval debulking surgery for ovarian cancer patients.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Case-Control Studies , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Serum Albumin/analysis , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39176205

ABSTRACT

Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard of care for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with tumors > 1 cm or positive axillary nodes. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has been used as an endpoint to select patients for treatment scaling. This study aimed to examine the benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for TNBC patients who did not achieve pCR after standard NACT in a real-world scenario. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with TNBC who underwent NACT between 2010 and 2020. Clinicopathological data were obtained from the patient records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted at the 5 years follow-up period. Results: We included 153 patients, more than half of whom had stage III (58.2%) and high-grade tumors (60.8%). The overall pCR rate was 34.6%, and 41% of the patients with residual disease received adjuvant capecitabine. Disease-specific survival (DSS) among the patients who achieved pCR was significantly higher (p<0.0001). Residual disease after NACT was associated with detrimental effects on DSS. In this cohort, we did not observe any survival benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for patients with TNBC subjected to NACT who did not achieve pCR (p=0.52). Conclusion: Our study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of extended capecitabine therapy in patients with TNBC with residual disease after NACT. More studies are warranted to better understand the indication of systemic treatment escalation in this scenario.


Subject(s)
Capecitabine , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Capecitabine/administration & dosage , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Adult , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Aged
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(16)2024 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39201325

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer (BC) remains a significant global health concern, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) offering preoperative benefits like tumor downstaging and treatment response assessment. However, identifying factors influencing post-NACT treatment response and survival outcomes is challenging. Metabolomic approaches offer promising insights into understanding these outcomes. This study analyzed the serum of 80 BC patients before and after NACT, followed for up to five years, correlating with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Using untargeted nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and a novel statistical model that avoids collinearity issues, we identified metabolic changes associated with survival outcomes. Four metabolites (histidine, lactate, serine, and taurine) were significantly associated with DFS. We developed a metabolite-related survival score (MRSS) from these metabolites, stratifying patients into low- and high-risk relapse groups, independent of classical prognostic factors. High-risk patients had a hazard ratio (HR) for DFS of 3.42 (95% CI 1.51-7.74; p = 0.003) after adjustment for disease stage and age. A similar trend was observed for OS (HR of 3.34, 95% CI 1.64-6.80; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis confirmed the independent prognostic value of the MRSS. Our findings suggest the potential of metabolomic data, alongside traditional markers, in guiding personalized treatment decisions and risk stratification in BC patients undergoing NACT. This study provides a methodological framework for leveraging metabolomics in survival analyses.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Metabolomics , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/blood , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Metabolomics/methods , Adult , Prognosis , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Metabolome , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Proportional Hazards Models
5.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 10: e2300187, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991183

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent neoplasm in women in Colombia and is associated with a higher mortality rate than in other countries and regions. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become a standard treatment in locally advanced BC and provides an opportunity to improve clinical outcomes in BC. This study aims to describe characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes after NACT in a cohort of Colombian patients with BC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study. We included adult patients with BC treated with NACT. Clinical charts were retrospectively reviewed. Descriptive statistics and time to event for overall survival analyses were performed. Recursive partitioning was performed for survival curves to assess the complex relationship between survival times and other variables. RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen patients were included for analysis. The pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ypCR) rate was 34.4%, with a higher ypCR in triple-negative BC (TNBC; 46.9%) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive BC (72.7%). Those who did not achieve ypCR had a higher percentage of death and relapse. The median follow-up was 4.9 years, with an 88.2% 5-year overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION: A total of 62.6% of the total patients identified were not treated with NACT, indicating a low utilization. Our global ypCR rate was higher when compared with similar studies in Colombia, likely because of differences in the NACT treatment regimens. ypCR was only associated with OS in the TNBC subgroup, emphasizing the importance of pursuing ypCR in these patients. We consider the use of NACT a valuable opportunity to implement innovative treatment approaches that improve outcomes in Colombian patients with BC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Female , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Colombia , Adult , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Treatment Outcome
6.
Arq Bras Cir Dig ; 37: e1810, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the preference for multimodal treatment for gastric cancer, abandonment of chemotherapy treatment as well as the need for upfront surgery in obstructed patients brings negative impacts on the treatment. The difficulty of accessing treatment in specialized centers in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) scenario is an aggravating factor. AIMS: To identify advantages, prognostic factors, complications, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies survival in gastric cancer treatment in SUS setting. METHODS: The retrospective study included 81 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment according to INT0116 trial (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy), CLASSIC trial (adjuvant chemotherapy), FLOT4-AIO trial (perioperative chemotherapy), and surgery with curative intention (R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy) in a single cancer center between 2015 and 2020. Individuals with other histological types, gastric stump, esophageal cancer, other treatment protocols, and stage Ia or IV were excluded. RESULTS: Patients were grouped into FLOT4-AIO (26 patients), CLASSIC (25 patients), and INT0116 (30 patients). The average age was 61 years old. More than 60% of patients had pathological stage III. The treatment completion rate was 56%. The pathological complete response rate of the FLOT4-AIO group was 7.7%. Among the prognostic factors that impacted overall survival and disease-free survival were alcoholism, early postoperative complications, and anatomopathological status pN2 and pN3. The 3-year overall survival rate was 64.9%, with the CLASSIC subgroup having the best survival (79.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy for gastric cancer varies according to the need for initial surgery. The CLASSIC subgroup had better overall survival and disease-free survival. The INT0116 regimen also protected against mortality, but not with statistical significance. Although FLOT4-AIO is the preferred treatment, the difficulty in carrying out neoadjuvant treatment in SUS scenario had a negative impact on the results due to the criticality of food intake and worse treatment tolerance.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Brazil/epidemiology , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Prognosis , National Health Programs , Gastrectomy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Staging , Perioperative Care
7.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 20(3): 832-839, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023591

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer (BC) and its treatment can impair patient quality of life (QoL), and those undergoing more aggressive treatments may be more severely impacted. Objective: Assess the level of perception of the QoL of patients treated for BC at the Hospital de Clínicas and the Departmental Hospital of Soriano. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire for cancer patients (EORTC, QLQ-C30) and one specific for BC (EORTC QLQ-BR23) were used. RESULTS: A total of 158 patients who had completed chemotherapy treatment at least one year prior to the evaluation were enrolled. The average age was 61 years old. QLQC QUESTIONNAIRE: The global QoL score (GQOL) was high: 70.9. Patients undergoing breast-conservation surgery (BCS) had better scores in physical and emotional functioning (p < 0.005) and presented less frequently with: pain, constipation, and financial difficulties (p < 0.005). Those undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) had higher scores for GQOL and for physical, role, and social functioning scales (p < 0.001) and had less fatigue, pain, insomnia, and financial difficulties (p < 0.005). QUESTIONNAIRE QLQBR: Sexual functioning and sexual enjoyment scales were relatively low. Patients undergoing BCS had better scores on the functional scales: body image and future outlook; and fewer breast symptoms (p < 0.005). Those undergoing SLNB also had better scores on the functional scales for body image and future outlook future and presented less frequently with symptoms (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Uruguayan BC patients experience high values on the GQOL scale; those undergoing BCS and SLNB had better scores on most functional and problem/symptom scales. Patients undergoing BCS had better scores in physical and emotional functioning and presented less frequently with pain, constipation, and financial difficulties. With respect to the type of axillary surgery received, patients who underwent SLNB had higher scores on the GQOL scale and on the physical, role, and social functional scales. The implementation of intervention strategies aimed at improving the quality of life, and the physical and emotional care of patients is recommended.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Uruguay/epidemiology , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Mastectomy , Mastectomy, Segmental/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy
8.
Breast Dis ; 43(1): 237-242, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995764

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the indication and use of genomic signatures in breast cancer patients and outcomes who in patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy or not. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of breast cancer patients managed in a private oncology clinic in Teresina, from November 2014 to February 2021. All patients with an indication of genomic signature were included. Clinical and pathological variables, use of genomic signatures, treatment and follow-up were obtained. The nomogram to predict Oncotype DX results (University of Tennessee Medical Center) was also calculated. Clinical risk calculation was based on MINDACT, using the modified version of Adjuvant Online. The genetic signatures performed were: the Oncotype, MammaPrint and EndoPredict. RESULTS: Fifty (50) female patients were included in the study. The mean age of the participants was 57.1 years. Among the patients receiving a genomic signature (26-52.0%), there was a change in treatment in 8 (30.7%) cases. Chemotherapy was indicated in four patients, It was contraindicated in another four patients. Treatment changed in 30.7% of the tested patients. Chemotherapy was indicated for those who would not receive it before. It was contraindicated in patients who would previously undergo chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Brazil , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Aged , Adult , Genomics
9.
Brasília; CONITEC; jul. 2024.
Non-conventional in Portuguese | BRISA/RedTESA | ID: biblio-1570857

ABSTRACT

INTRODUÇÃO: O câncer de próstata é, atualmente, a segunda neoplasia mais comum entre os homens em todo o mundo e compreende 13,5% de todos os diagnósticos de câncer nesta população. A apalutamida, enzalutamida e darolutamida são medicamentos da classe dos inibidores de receptor de androgênio e a abiraterona é um inibidor da síntese de androgênios. Entretanto, todas estas tecnologias são consideradas como agentes direcionados ao eixo do receptor de andrógeno (ARAT) de segunda geração, atuando como antagonistas não esteroidais do receptor de andrógeno, que podem ser associados à terapia de privação androgênica (TPA), e atuam inibindo a ação da testosterona ou da diidrotestosterona ao se ligarem aos receptores androgênicos periféricos sem ativar a expressão gênica. No SUS, abiraterona está disponível apenas para CPRCm com uso prévio de docetaxel. Apesar disso abiraterona e enzalutamida são recomendadas em diretrizes internacionais para CPRCm (virgens e com uso prévio de quimioterapia) e apalutamida, darolutamida e enzalutamida são recomendadas para CPRCnm. PERGUNTAS DE PESQUISA: 1) Apalutamida, darolutamida ou enzalutamida combinadas à TPA são eficazes e seguras no tratamento de indivíduos com câncer de próstata não metastático resistente à castração comparadas à TPA isolada ou TPA + bicalutamida?; 2) Abiraterona ou enzalutamida combinadas à TPA são eficazes e seguras no tratamento de indivíduos com câncer d


Subject(s)
Humans , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Abiraterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Unified Health System , Brazil , Efficacy , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics
10.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 30(7): 1283-1294, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845203

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with delays in beginning adjuvant therapy and prognosis impacts on non-metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: This assessment comprised a prospective cohort study concerning breast cancer patients treated at a public oncology centre. A time interval of ≥60 days between surgery and the beginning of the first adjuvant treatment was categorised as a delay. Factors associated with delays were evaluated through logistic regression analysis and the prognosis effects were assessed by a Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The median time interval between surgery and the first adjuvant treatment for the 401 women included in this study was of 57.0 days (37.0-93.0). Independent factors associated with delays comprised not presenting an overexpression of the HER-2 protein, not having undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and having undergone chemotherapy or other therapeutic modalities other than hormone therapy and chemotherapy as the first adjuvant treatment. Delays did not affect recurrence, distant metastasis, or death risks. Factors associated with recurrence and distant metastasis risks comprised a clinical staging ≥2B, having undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy, presenting the luminal molecular subtype B and triple-negative tumours, and having children. Factors associated with death comprised triple-negative molecular tumours and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Delays in beginning adjuvant treatment did not affect the prognosis of non-metastatic breast cancer patients. Clinical and treatment-related factors, on the other hand, were associated with delays, and recurrence, distant metastasis, and death risks.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Prognosis , Adult , Aged , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
11.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 96, 2024 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) typically involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery (total mesorectal excision, TME). While achieving a complete pathological response (pCR) is a strong indicator of a positive prognosis, the specific benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy after pCR remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential advantages of adjuvant therapy in patients who achieve pCR. METHODS: In this study, we searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant research. We focused on binary outcomes, analyzing them using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To account for potential variability between studies, all endpoints were analyzed with DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and employed the R statistical software (version 4.2.3) for all analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies, comprising 31,558 patients, were included. The outcomes demonstrated a significant difference favoring the AC group in terms of overall survival (OS) (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p = 0.015; I2 = 0%), and OS in 5 years (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.21-2.24; p = 0.001; I2 = 39%). There was no significant difference between the groups for disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.17; p = 0.61; I2 = 17%), DFS in 5 years (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.82-1.74; p = 0.36; I2 = 43%), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.87-1.40; p = 0.39; I2 = 0%), and relapse-free survival (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.78-1.51; p = 0.62; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant difference in favor of the ACT group in terms of survival after pCR. Therefore, the administration of this treatment as adjuvant therapy should be encouraged in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Treatment Outcome , Survival Analysis , Disease-Free Survival , Neoadjuvant Therapy
12.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 71: 102620, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38897101

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study investigated the role of resilience and coping strategies on breast cancer patients' well-being using a structural equation model. To achieve this objective, a model previously developed by Mayordomo's group was partially replicated using a longitudinal study design in an oncological sample. METHODS: The study was a longitudinal observational survey. Patients with breast cancer were recruited (N = 166). Resilience was measured with the Mexican Resilience Measurement Scale, coping strategies with the Forms of Coping and Dimensions Scale and perception of the psychological well-being with a short-form of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being at the start and end of adjuvant chemotherapy (T1 and T2 respectively). RESULTS: The results showed stability in the variables over time and revealed differences with respect to Mayordomo's model. The best predictor of well-being at T2 was well-being at T1. In addition, the model indicated that resilience had a direct impact on well-being through problem-focused coping. Indeed, resilience and problem-focused coping best explained well-being at T2. CONCLUSIONS: Both at the start and end of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, problem-focused coping positively predicted resilience, which in turn was a positive predictor of well-being. On the other hand, emotion-focused coping showed no association with resilience or well-being. As part of the multidisciplinary cancer team, oncology nurses have a key role to play in promoting resilience and problem-focused coping as an important goal of psychosocial interventions in breast cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Breast Neoplasms , Resilience, Psychological , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Adult , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/psychology , Mexico , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Coping Skills
13.
J Bras Pneumol ; 50(3): e20230292, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896732

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cystic fibrosis (CF) affects multiple organs, the most severe consequences being observed in the lungs. Despite significant progress in developing CF transmembrane conductance regulator-specific treatments for CF lung disease, exploring alternative CF-targeted medications seems reasonable. We sought to evaluate the potential beneficial effects of oral benzbromarone as an adjuvant therapy in CF patients with reduced lung function. METHODS: This was a prospective open-label pilot study of oral benzbromarone (100 mg/day) administered once daily for 90 days. Patients were followed at a tertiary referral center in southern Brazil. Safety was assessed by the number of reported adverse events. Secondary objectives included percent predicted FEV1 (FEV1%) and pulmonary exacerbations. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. Benzbromarone was found to be safe, with no serious drug-related adverse events. Eight patients completed the study; the median relative change in FEV1% tended to increase during the treatment, showing an 8% increase from baseline at the final visit. However, a nonparametric test showed that the change was not significant (p = 0.06). Of a total of ten patients, only one experienced at least one pulmonary exacerbation during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Oral benzbromarone appears to be safe, and improved FEV1% has been observed in patients with CF. Further assessment in larger trials is warranted to elucidate whether oral benzbromarone can be a potential adjuvant therapy for CF.


Subject(s)
Benzbromarone , Cystic Fibrosis , Humans , Cystic Fibrosis/drug therapy , Cystic Fibrosis/physiopathology , Pilot Projects , Male , Female , Benzbromarone/therapeutic use , Benzbromarone/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Adolescent , Forced Expiratory Volume/drug effects , Uricosuric Agents/therapeutic use , Statistics, Nonparametric , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Time Factors
14.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 26(11): 2812-2825, 2024 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914755

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a 5-year overall survival rate of over 60%. The decrease in the rate of metastatic disease is due to screening programs and the population's awareness of healthy lifestyle. Similarly, advancements in surgical methods and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy have contributed to a decrease in the recurrence of resected disease. Before evaluating a patient's treatment, it is recommended to be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board. In stage II tumors, the pathologic characteristics of poor prognosis must be known (T4, number of lymph nodes analyzed less than 12, lymphovascular or perineural invasion, obstruction or perforation, poor histologic grade, presence of tumor budding) and it is mandatory to determine the MSI/MMR status for avoiding administering fluoropyridimidines in monotherapy to patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors. In stage III tumors, the standard treatment consists of a combination of fluoropyrimidine (oral or intravenous) with oxaliplatin for 6 months although the administration of CAPOX can be considered for 3 months in low-risk tumors. Neoadjuvant treatment is not consolidated yet although immunotherapy is achieving very good preliminary results in MSI-H patients. The use of ctDNA to define the treatment and monitoring of resected tumors is only recommended within studies. These guidelines are intended to help decision-making to offer the best management of patients with non-metastatic colon cancer.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Humans , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Medical Oncology
15.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol ; 397(11): 8259-8284, 2024 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847831

ABSTRACT

Cancer remains a global health challenge, prompting a search for effective treatments with fewer side effects. Thymol, a natural monoterpenoid phenol derived primarily from thyme (Thymus vulgaris) and other plants in the Lamiaceae family, is known for its diverse biological activities. It emerges as a promising candidate in cancer prevention and therapy. This study aims to consolidate current research on thymol's anticancer effects, elucidating its mechanisms and potential to enhance standard chemotherapy, and to identify gaps for future research. A comprehensive review was conducted using databases like PubMed/MedLine, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect, focusing on studies from the last 6 years. All cancer types were included, assessing thymol's impact in both cell-based (in vitro) and animal (in vivo) studies. Thymol has been shown to induce programmed cell death (apoptosis), halt the cell division cycle (cell cycle arrest), and inhibit cancer spread (metastasis) through modulation of critical signaling pathways, including phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (AKT), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), and Wnt/ß-catenin. It also enhances the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in colorectal cancer treatments. Thymol's broad-spectrum anticancer activities and non-toxic profile to normal cells underscore its potential as an adjunct in cancer therapy. Further clinical trials are essential to fully understand its therapeutic benefits and integration into existing treatment protocols.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Thymol , Thymol/pharmacology , Thymol/therapeutic use , Humans , Animals , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Apoptosis/drug effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
16.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 80(9): 1373-1385, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888626

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Incorporation of AKT inhibitors into adjuvant therapy for advanced or metastatic breast cancer has improved clinical outcomes. However, the safety of AKT inhibitors should be better evaluated, given the possibility of prolonging survival and impacting patient quality of life. Our aim was to assess how the addition of AKT inhibitors to adjuvant therapy affects treatment-related adverse events. METHODS: We evaluated binary outcomes with risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models for all endpoints. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs comprising 1619 patients with BC. The adverse effects that show significance statistical favoring the occurrence of adverse effects in AKT inhibitor were diarrhea (RR 3.05; 95% CI 2.48-3.75; p < 0.00001; I2 = 49%), hyperglycemia (RR 3.4; 95% CI 1.69-6.83; p = 0.00058; I2 = 75%), nausea (RR 1.69; 95% CI 1.34-2.13; p = 0.000008; I2 = 42%), rash (RR 2.79; 95% CI 1.49-5.23; p = 0.0013; I2 = 82%), stomatitis (RR 2.24; 95% CI 1.69-2.97; p < 0.00001; I2 = 16%) and vomiting (RR 2.99; 95% CI 1.85-4.86; p = 0.00009; I2 = 42%). There was no significant difference between the groups for alopecia (p = 0.80), fatigue (p = 0.087), and neuropathy (p = 0.363380). CONCLUSION: The addition of AKT inhibitors to adjuvant therapy was associated with an increase in treatment-related adverse events. These results provide safety information for further clinical trials evaluating AKT inhibitor therapy for patients with metastatic BC. Clinicians should closely monitor patients for treatment-related adverse events to avoid discontinuation of therapy and morbidity caused by these early-stage therapies.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt/antagonists & inhibitors , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
17.
Int. j. colorectal. dis ; 39(96)jun.2024. ilus, tab
Article in English | CONASS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1567981

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) typically involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery (total mesorectal excision, TME). While achieving a complete pathological response (pCR) is a strong indicator of a positive prognosis, the specific benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy after pCR remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential advantages of adjuvant therapy in patients who achieve pCR. METHODS: In this study, we searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant research. We focused on binary outcomes, analyzing them using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To account for potential variability between studies, all endpoints were analyzed with DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and employed the R statistical software (version 4.2.3) for all analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies, comprising 31,558 patients, were included. The outcomes demonstrated a significant difference favoring the AC group in terms of overall survival (OS) (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p = 0.015; I2 = 0%), and OS in 5 years (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.21-2.24; p = 0.001; I2 = 39%). There was no significant difference between the groups for disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.17; p = 0.61; I2 = 17%), DFS in 5 years (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.82-1.74; p = 0.36; I2 = 43%), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.87-1.40; p = 0.39; I2 = 0%), and relapse-free survival (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.78-1.51; p = 0.62; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant difference in favor of the ACT group in terms of survival after pCR. Therefore, the administration of this treatment as adjuvant therapy should be encouraged in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Neoadjuvant Therapy
18.
Cir Cir ; 92(2): 159-164, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782386

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the intestinal and pancreatobiliary subtypes of ampullary adenocarcinoma in a large patient group due to limited data on survival and risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the clinical and pathological findings and the survival of 184 patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma who underwent curative operation between 2007 and 2018 was performed. RESULTS: Pancreatobiliary subtype had a higher prevalence of jaundice before operation than the intestinal subtype (p < 0.05). Pancreatobiliary subtype had a larger tumor size (> 2 mm) (p < 0.01) and poorer differentiation (p < 0.05) than the intestinal subtype. Perineural invasion more frequently occurred in pancreatobiliary subtype than the intestinal subtype (p < 0.01) and pancreatobiliary subtype had a higher prevalence of positive dissected lymph nodes (p < 0.05) with an advanced disease stage (p < 0.01) than the intestinal subtype. Patients of the pancreatobiliary subtype had poorer disease-free and overall survival than patients of the intestinal subtype. No survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was found in either patients of the intestinal subtype or pancreatobiliary subtype. No significant difference was found in any subtypes regarding the recurrent regions. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatobiliary subtype exhibited a higher recurrence rate and a poorer overall survival rate with more unfavorable pathological characteristics than the intestinal subtype.


OBJETIVOS: Los datos sobre la supervivencia y los factores de riesgo del adenocarcinoma ampular son limitados debido a su rareza. Este estudio buscó comparar el subtipo intestinal y el subtipo pancreático-biliar en pacientes con adenocarcinoma ampular. MÉTODOS: Análisis retrospectivo de hallazgos clínicos y patológicos y la supervivencia de 184 pacientes con adenocarcinoma ampular tratados entre 2007 y 2018. RESULTADOS: El subtipo pancreático-biliar tuvo una mayor prevalencia de ictericia antes de la operación y un tamaño de tumor mayor, y una peor diferenciación, que el subtipo intestinal. La invasión perineural fue más frecuente en el subtipo pancreático-biliar, con una mayor prevalencia de linfonodos disecados positivos y un estadio avanzado de la enfermedad. Los pacientes del subtipo pancreático-biliar tuvieron una supervivencia libre de enfermedad y una supervivencia general peores que los pacientes del subtipo intestinal. No se encontró ningún beneficio de la quimioterapia adyuvante en pacientes del subtipo intestinal o pancreático-biliar. No hubo diferencia significativa en las regiones recurrentes. CONCLUSIÓN: El subtipo pancreático-biliar mostró una tasa de recurrencia y una tasa de supervivencia general peores, con características patológicas más desfavorables que el subtipo intestinal.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Ampulla of Vater , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Ampulla of Vater/pathology , Male , Female , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/classification , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/classification , Middle Aged , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Adult , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Aged, 80 and over , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Lymphatic Metastasis , Tumor Burden , Disease-Free Survival
19.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 206(2): 329-335, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743176

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising biomarker for predicting treatment response and disease outcomes in Breast Cancer (BC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). To determine if cfDNA originates from tumors, matching tumor and cfDNA gene mutations are necessary, often requiring tumor DNA sequencing. We assessed plasma cfDNA integrity by measuring concentrations and ratios of larger-to-smaller Alu DNA fractions as a potential biomarker, eliminating the need for prior tumor sequencing. METHODS: We included patients with localized and/or locally advanced BC receiving standard NAC alone or in combination with immunotherapy and/or anti-HER2 targeted therapy. Blood samples were collected before treatment, every 2 weeks during treatment, and before surgery. RESULTS: Of the 38 evaluated patients, only 28 completed the protocol and underwent surgery after NAC. Seven patients (25%) achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). We found that cfDNA integrity (cfDNAI) levels at 15 days after starting NAC were significantly higher in patients who achieved pCR (p = 0.045) and correlated significantly with Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in univariate analysis (p = 0.0371). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of cfDNAI 2 weeks after NAC initiation appears to be an early biomarker for tumor pCR and DFS. Measuring Alu fragments of different lengths may replace techniques requiring prior tumor sequencing to measure ctDNA, reducing costs and complexity of cfDNA serial measurements in BC patients undergoing NAC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/blood , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Adult , Aged , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/genetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Circulating Tumor DNA/blood , Circulating Tumor DNA/genetics , Treatment Outcome , Prognosis , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
20.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 298: 192-196, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788535

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Endometrial cancer (EC) treatment changed substantially with the introduction of molecular classification. Low-middle income (LMIC) countries will face barriers to including molecular classification to guide treatment. This study aims to analyse the value of p53 immunohistochemistry to delineate adjuvant treatment in FIGO stages I and II. METHODS: Patients with EC treated between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients included in this analysis must have reviewed FIGO stage I/II high-grade histologies (endometrioid grade 3, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, mixed and undifferentiated). Samples were subjected to p53 immunohistochemistry. Recurrence-free and overall survival were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2016, 265 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with aberrant p53 (71.4 %) were associated with older age (59.7 % vs 77.8 % with more than 60 years), relapse (12.5 vs 29.6 %) and death (22.2 vs 46.7 %). The pattern of relapse was not different, with most being at extrapelvic sites (55.5 % vs 62.3 % for p53 wild type and aberrant, respectively). The median overall survival was not reached versus 92.2 months for p53 wild type and aberrant, respectively (p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, chemotherapy decreased death (p = 0.014) in p53 aberrant tumours, a benefit not seen in the wild-type cohort (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis corroborates the finding of worse outcomes for p53 aberrant tumours in stage I/II EC and the benefit of more aggressive adjuvant treatment (systemic therapy and radiotherapy). Although not ideal as a sole molecular marker, p53 immunohistochemistry could complement the classical anatomopathological features and be part of the decision-making process with patients in LMIC.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Immunohistochemistry , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 , Humans , Female , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/analysis , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Neoplasm Staging , Developing Countries , Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL