Impact of lumacaftor/ivacaftor on the bacterial and fungal respiratory pathogens in cystic fibrosis: a prospective multicenter cohort study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: A significant decline in pulmonary exacerbation rates has been reported in CF patients homozygous for F508del treated with lumacaftor/ivacaftor. However, it is still unclear whether this reduction reflects a diminished microbiological burden. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of lumacaftor/ivacaftor on the bacterial and fungal burden. DESIGN: The study is a prospective multicenter cohort study including 132 CF patients homozygous for F508del treated with lumacaftor/ivacaftor. METHODS: Clinical parameters as well as bacterial and fungal outcomes 1 year after initiation of lumacaftor/ivacaftor were compared to data from 2 years prior to initiation of the treatment. Changes in the slope of the outcomes before and after the onset of treatment were assessed. RESULTS: Lung function measured as ppFEV1 (p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) in adults (p < 0.001), and BMI z-score in children (p = 0.007) were improved after initiation of lumacaftor/ivacaftor. In addition, the slope of the prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae (p = 0.007) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (p < 0.001) shifted from positive to negative, that is, became less prevalent, 1 year after treatment, while the slope for Candida albicans (p = 0.009), Penicillium spp (p = 0.026), and Scedosporium apiospermum (p < 0.001) shifted from negative to positive. CONCLUSION: The current study showed a significant improvement in clinical parameters and a reduction of some of CF respiratory microorganisms 1 year after starting with lumacaftor/ivacaftor. However, no significant changes were observed for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, or Aspergillus fumigatus, key pathogens in the CF context.

Predicting lung function decline in cystic fibrosis: the impact of initiating ivacaftor therapy.

BACKGROUND: Modulator therapies that seek to correct the underlying defect in cystic fibrosis (CF) have revolutionized the clinical landscape. Given the heterogeneous nature of lung disease progression in the post-modulator era, there is a need to develop prediction models that are robust to modulator uptake. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of the CF Foundation Patient Registry (N = 867 patients carrying the G551D mutation who were treated with ivacaftor from 2003 to 2018). The primary outcome was lung function (percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s or FEV1pp). To characterize the association between ivacaftor initiation and lung function, we developed a dynamic prediction model through covariate selection of demographic and clinical characteristics. The ability of the selected model to predict a decline in lung function, clinically known as an FEV1-indicated exacerbation signal (FIES), was evaluated both at the population level and individual level. RESULTS: Based on the final model, the estimated improvement in FEV1pp after ivacaftor initiation was 4.89% predicted (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.90 to 5.89). The rate of decline was reduced with ivacaftor initiation by 0.14% predicted/year (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.27). More frequent outpatient visits prior to study entry and being male corresponded to a higher overall FEV1pp. Pancreatic insufficiency, older age at study entry, a history of more frequent pulmonary exacerbations, lung infections, CF-related diabetes, and use of Medicaid insurance corresponded to lower FEV1pp. The model had excellent predictive accuracy for FIES events with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.83 to 0.84) for the independent testing cohort and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89 to 0.90) for 6-month forecasting with the masked cohort. The root-mean-square errors of the FEV1pp predictions for these cohorts were 7.31% and 6.78% predicted, respectively, with standard deviations of 0.29 and 0.20. The predictive accuracy was robust across different covariate specifications. CONCLUSIONS: The methods and applications of dynamic prediction models developed using data prior to modulator uptake have the potential to inform post-modulator projections of lung function and enhance clinical surveillance in the new era of CF care.

In utero and postnatal ivacaftor/lumacaftor therapy rescues multiorgan disease in CFTR-F508del ferrets.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, with F508del being the most prevalent mutation. The combination of CFTR modulators (potentiator and correctors) has provided benefit to CF patients carrying the F508del mutation; however, the safety and effectiveness of in utero combination modulator therapy remains unclear. We created a F508del ferret model to test whether ivacaftor/lumacaftor (VX-770/VX-809) therapy can rescue in utero and postnatal pathologies associated with CF. Using primary intestinal organoids and air-liquid interface cultures of airway epithelia, we demonstrate that the F508del mutation in ferret CFTR results in a severe folding and trafficking defect, which can be partially restored by treatment with CFTR modulators. In utero treatment of pregnant jills with ivacaftor/lumacaftor prevented meconium ileus at birth in F508del kits and sustained postnatal treatment of CF offspring improved survival and partially protected from pancreatic insufficiency. Withdrawal of ivacaftor/lumacaftor treatment from juvenile CF ferrets reestablished pancreatic and lung diseases, with altered pulmonary mechanics. These findings suggest that in utero intervention with a combination of CFTR modulators may provide therapeutic benefits to individuals with F508del. This CFTR-F508del ferret model may be useful for testing therapies using clinically translatable endpoints.

Year in review 2023 - Back to the future.

This review synthesizes articles published in 2023, focusing on the impact of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) in cystic fibrosis (CF) care. Real-world data highlights sustained benefits of ETI across age groups, while challenges like neuropsychological side effects persist. Beyond CFTR modulators, research explores telemedicine and novel therapies. Prioritizing equitable access and addressing unmet needs remain crucial for comprehensive CF management.

Lung clearance index (LCI2.5) changes after initiation of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in children with cystic fibrosis aged between 6 and 11 years: The "real-world" differs from trial data.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor in combination with Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor (ETI) became licensed in the United Kingdom in early 2022 for children aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis (CF) and an eligible mutation. Many in this age group have excellent prior lung health making quantitative measurement of benefit challenging. Clinical trials purport that lung clearance index (LCI2.5) measurement is most suitable for this purpose. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand the clinical utility of LCI2.5 in detecting change after commencing ETI in the real world. PATIENT SELECTION/METHODS: Baseline anthropometric data were collected along with spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1], forced vital capacityFV and LCI2.5 measures in children aged 6-11 years with CF before starting ETI. Measures were repeated after a mean (range) of 8.2 (7-14) months of ETI treatment. The primary endpoint was a change in LCI2.5, with secondary endpoints including change in FEV1 and change in body mass index (BMI) also reported. RESULTS: Twelve children were studied (seven male, mean age 9.5 years at baseline). Our study population had a mean (SD) LCI2.5 of 7.01 (1.14) and FEV1 of 96 (13) %predicted at baseline. Mean (95% confidence interval) changes in LCI2.5 [-0.7 (-1.4, 0), p = .06] and BMI [+0.7 (+0.1, +1.3), p = .03] were observed, along with changes in FEV1 of +3.1 (-1.9, +8.1) %predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world changes in LCI2.5 (-0.7) are different to those reported in clinical trials (-2.29). Lower baseline LCI2.5 as a result of prior modulator exposure, high baseline lung health, and new LCI2.5 software analyses all contribute to lower LCI2.5 values being recorded in the real world of children with CF.

Efficacy of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis.

PURPOSE: Our work aims to add evidence on the effectiveness of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study at the Cystic Fibrosis Center of a tertiary care hospital to investigate the effect of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis patients, aged 12 or older. The study's endpoints were the change in the occurrence of acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis, and the variation of the endoscopic and radiologic findings scored using the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scale, Lund-Mackay, and modified Lund-Mackay radiologic scales, in patients who underwent both pre-treatment and post-treatment examinations. RESULTS: The study population comprised 136 patients, of which 28 underwent both pre-treatment and post-treatment nasal endoscopy and 15 had pre- and post-treatment CT scans. Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor provided a significant improvement in chronic rhinosinusitis. The mean number of acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis per year in the pre-treatment time was 0.55 versus 0.35 during the treatment (p < 0.0021). The Lund-Kennedy scale had a pre-treatment average score of 4.21 points versus 1.5 points after the start of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor (p < 0.0001). The average Lund-Mackay and modified Lund-Mackay scores in the pre-treatment time were respectively 14.6 and 16.45 points; and after the start of the therapy, they became 5.87 and 6.73 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor was associated with fewer acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis, and a significant improvement of chronic rhinosinusitis evaluated endoscopically and radiologically. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the change in the occurrence of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis in patients affected by cystic fibrosis in therapy with Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor.

Highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance (regulator) modulator therapy: shifting the curve for most while leaving some further behind.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Traditional cystic fibrosis (CF) care had been focused on early intervention and symptom mitigation. With the advent of highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy (HEMT), in particular, the approval of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in 2019, there has been a dramatic improvement in outcomes in CF. The purpose of this article is to review the benefits, limitations, and impact of HEMT as well as discuss the new implications, challenges, and hope that modulators bring to people with CF (pwCF). RECENT FINDINGS: HEMT has demonstrated sustained improvement in lung function, nutrition, quality of life, and survival for over 90% of pwCF. As HEMT has delivered such promise, there is a small but significant portion of pwCF who do not benefit from HEMT due to ineligible mutations, intolerance, or lack of accessibility to modulators. SUMMARY: HEMT has significantly improved outcomes, but continued research is needed to understand the new challenges and implications the era of HEMT will bring, as well as how to provide equitable care to those who are unable to benefit from HEMT.

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor improves chronic rhinosinusitis detected by magnetic resonance imaging in children with cystic fibrosis on long-term therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated early onset and progression of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) from infancy to school age, and response to lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) therapy in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, the effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) on CRS detected by MRI in children with CF and at least one F508del mutation, and potential incremental effects of ELX/TEZ/IVA compared to LUM/IVA in F508del homozygous children have not been studied. METHODS: 30 children with CF with at least one F508del mutation underwent three longitudinal paranasal sinus MRI before (MRI1), without (n = 16) or with LUM/IVA therapy (n = 14, MRI2), and with ELX/TEZ/IVA therapy (MRI3, mean age at therapy initiation 11.1 ± 3.4y, range 6-16y). MRI were evaluated using the CRS-MRI score. RESULTS: After therapy initiation with ELX/TEZ/IVA, the prevalence and in maxillary and sphenoid sinuses the dominance of mucopyoceles decreased (35% vs. 0 %, p<0.001 and 26% vs. 8 %, p < 0.05, respectively). This leads to a reduction in mucopyocele subscore (-3.4 ± 1.9, p < 0.001), and sinus subscores in MRI3 (maxillary sinus: -5.3 ± 3.1, p < 0.001, frontal sinus: -1.0 ± 1.9, p < 0.01, sphenoid subscore: -2.8 ± 3.5, p < 0.001, ethmoid sinus: -1.7 ± 1.9, p < 0.001). The CRS-MRI sum score decreased after therapy initiation with ELX/TEZ/IVA by -9.6 ± 5.5 score points (p < 0.001). The strength in reduction of mucopyoceles subscore and CRS-MRI sum score was independent of a pretreatment with LUM/IVA from MRI1-MRI2 (p = 0.275-0.999). CONCLUSIONS: ELX/TEZ/IVA therapy leads to improvement of CRS in eligible children with CF. Our data support the role of MRI for comprehensive monitoring of CRS disease severity and response to therapy in children with CF.

Effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on mucus and mucociliary clearance in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (E/T/I) is highly effective clinically for those with at least one F508del-CFTR allele. The effects of E/T/I on mucociliary clearance (MCC) and sputum properties are unknown. We, therefore, sought to characterize the effects of E/T/I on in vivo MCC and sputum characteristics hypothesized to impact mucus transport. METHODS: Forty-four participants ≥12 years of age were enrolled into this prospective, observational trial prior to initiation of E/T/I and had baseline measurement of MCC and characterization of induced sputum and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples. Study procedures were repeated after 1 month of E/T/I treatment. RESULTS: Average age was 27.7 years with baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 78.2 % predicted. 52 % of subjects had previously been treated with a 2-drug CFTR modulator combination. The average whole lung MCC rate measured over 60 min (WLAveClr60) significantly improved from baseline to post-E/T/I (14.8 vs. 22.8 %; p = 0.0002), as did other MCC indices. Sputum% solids also improved (modeled mean 3.4 vs. 2.2 %; p<0.0001), whereas non-significant reductions in sputum macrorheology (G', G") were observed. No meaningful changes in exhaled breath condensate endpoints (sialic acid:urea ratio, pH) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: E/T/I improved the hydration of respiratory secretions (% solids) and markedly accelerated MCC. These data confirm the link between CFTR function, mucus solid content, and MCC and help to define the utility of MCC and mucus-related bioassays in future efforts to restore CFTR function in all people with CF.

Trials and tribulations of highly effective modulator therapies in cystic fibrosis.

Highly effective modulator therapies (HEMTs) have revolutionised the management approach of most patients living with cystic fibrosis (CF) who have access to these therapies. Clinical trials have reported significant improvements across multiorgan systems, with patients surviving longer. However, there are accumulating case reports and observational data describing various adverse events following initiation of HEMTs including drug-to-drug interactions, drug induced liver injury, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and neurocognitive symptoms including psychosis and depression, which have required discontinuation of therapy. Current clinical trials are assessing efficacy in younger patients with CF, yet long-term studies are also required to better understand the safety profile in the real-world setting across all ages and the impact of HEMT dose alteration or discontinuation.

Seguridad y efectividad del tratamiento con elexacaftor, tezacaftor e ivacaftor en adultos con fibrosis quística / Safety and effectiveness of treatment with elexacaftor, tezacaftor and ivacaftor in adults with cystic fibrosis

Introducción La fibrosis quística (FQ) es una enfermedad causada por mutaciones en el gen localizado en el cromosoma 7 que codifica la proteína reguladora de la conductancia transmembrana de la FQ. Varios ensayos han demostrado la eficacia y seguridad de la combinación ELE/TEZ/IVA en los pacientes que tienen al menos una mutación F508del. El objetivo principal del estudio fue evaluar la seguridad a los 3 y 6 meses del tratamiento con ELE/TEZ/IVA en pacientes adultos con FQ. Métodos Se trata de un estudio transversal, prospectivo y unicéntrico de vida real en el que se incluyeron pacientes adultos de la unidad multidisciplinar de FQ del Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal que cumplían criterios para recibir tratamiento con ELE/TEZ/IVA. Se registraron las características demográficas y clínicas de todos los pacientes. Durante el tiempo del estudio, se llevaron a cabo 3 visitas (basal, a los 3 y a los 6 meses). Se registraron los efectos secundarios y la evolución de la función hepática durante el tiempo de seguimiento. Resultados A los 3 meses del inicio del tratamiento se observó una mejoría estadísticamente significativa de la función pulmonar, el IMC, las exacerbaciones pulmonares y el nivel de energía, así como en todas las categorías del cuestionario CFQ-R excepto en el dominio digestivo. Esta mejoría se mantuvo, pero no se incrementó, a los 6 meses en todas las variables, excepto en el IMC, donde sí se observaron diferencias entre los 3 y 6 meses de tratamiento. Conclusiones En la cohorte estudiada, el tratamiento con ELE/TEZ/IVA tiene un buen perfil de seguridad y produce un mejoría precoz en la función pulmonar, el IMC, la calidad de vida y el «nivel de energía» de los pacientes adultos con FQ, que se mantiene a los 6 meses de tratamiento (AU)

Introduction Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a disease caused by mutations in the gene located on chromosome 7 that encodes the CF transmembrane conductance regulator protein. Several trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the ELE/TEZ/IVA combination in patients who have at least one F508del mutation. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the safety at 3 and 6 months of treatment with ELE/TEZ/IVA in adult patients with CF. Methods This is a real-life, prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study that included adult patients from the CF multidisciplinary unit. The demographic and clinical characteristics of all patients were recorded. During the time of the study, 3 visits were carried out (baseline, at 3 and at 6 months). Side effects were recorded during the follow-up time. Results 3 months after the start of treatment, a statistically significant improvement was observed. of lung function, BMI, pulmonary exacerbations and energy level, as well as in all the categories of the CFQ-R questionnaire except in the digestive domain. This improvement was maintained, but not increased at 6 months in all variables, except BMI, where differences were observed between 3 and 6 months of treatment. Conclusions In the cohort studied, treatment with ELE/TEZ/IVA has a good safety profile. and produces an early improvement in lung function, BMI, quality of life and the “energy level” of adult patients with CF, which is maintained at 6 months of treatment (AU)

Understanding and addressing the needs of people with cystic fibrosis in the era of CFTR modulator therapy.

Cystic fibrosis is a multiorgan disease caused by impaired function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). Since the introduction of the CFTR modulator combination elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), which acts directly on mutant CFTR to enhance its activity, most people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) have seen pronounced reductions in symptoms, and studies project marked increases in life expectancy for pwCF who are eligible for ETI. However, modulator therapy has not cured cystic fibrosis and the success of CFTR modulators has resulted in immediate questions about the new state of cystic fibrosis disease and clinical challenges in the care of pwCF. In this Series paper, we summarise key questions about cystic fibrosis disease in the era of modulator therapy, highlighting state-of-the-art research and clinical practices, knowledge gaps, new challenges faced by pwCF and the potential for future health-care challenges, and the pressing need for additional therapies to treat the underlying genetic or molecular causes of cystic fibrosis.