Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of Urticaria Control Test (UCT).

The urticaria control test (UCT) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for chronic urticaria (CU) patients. As a Persian version of the UCT was not available, the present research aimed to develop such a version, to test its reliability and validity as well as to evaluate urticaria control among Persian-speaking patients. This research was conducted at the Urticaria Centre of Reference and Excellence (UCARE) of Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. In a first step, a linguistically validated Persian version of the UCT was developed through a structured forward and backward translation process and subsequent cognitive debriefing interviews. In a second step, the Persian version of the UCT was completed by 100 well-characterized CU patients together with two anchor instruments, the Chronic Urticaria Quality of life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL) and the urticaria activity score (UAS), to obtain information on its internal consistency reliability and convergent validity. The Persian version of the UCT was found to have acceptable internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.68. In addition, the results obtained with the Persian UCT correlated with the CU-Q2oL total score (-0.48, p<0.001) and the UAS (-0.404, p˂0.001), suggesting convergent validity. Virtually all patients had poorly controlled CU (UCT<12). A Persian version of the UCT is now available and may help to improve the assessment and monitoring of disease control in Persian-speaking CU patients and to optimize treatment decisions.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on chronic spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is considered to play a role in the pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, the efficacy of HP eradication therapy on CSU symptom improvement has not been well established. This meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the association between HP infection and CSU and to evaluate whether HP eradication therapy benefits patients with CSU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In October 2018, we searched databases for studies investigating the efficacy of HP eradication therapy for patients with CSU. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random effects models. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 22 studies with a total of 1385 patients with CSU. When comparing the spontaneous remission of urticarial symptom in patients with HP-positive to HP-negative patients, HP-negative patients showed significantly higher spontaneous remission of urticarial symptoms. (risk ratio 0.39; 95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.81). Among HP-positive CSU patients, remission of CSU was more likely shown in HP eradication therapy group compared to untreated group, aside from achieving HP elimination (risk ratio 2.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.20-3.68). However, there was no significant difference in the remission of CSU whether antibiotic therapy was successful in eradication of HP or not (risk ratio 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis show that HP might be associated with the occurrence and persistence of CSU. The effectiveness of HP eradication therapy in suppressing CSU symptoms was significant. Interestingly, we found that resolution of CSU was not associated with successful eradication of HP infection. CSU Patients who were undergone antibiotic therapy for HP eradication showed significant higher CSU remission with or without HP eradication. Further studies are recommended to evaluate the mechanisms associated with relation of HP with CSU.