Reduced rates of substance use disorder in patients with alopecia: An all of us case-control study.

Alopecia areata (AA), depression, anxiety, and decreased quality of life are highly associated in the literature. It has been noted that there is an increased risk of substance use in those with AA to help cope with the psychological burdens and perceived stigmatization. This study aims to explore the relationship between substance use disorder (SUD) and scarring/non-scarring alopecia using the All of Us database. Of the 9,385 patients with alopecia, 8.4% had SUD of any kind. Multivariable regression revealed that alopecia is a potential protective factor against SUD when controlling for other covariates of significance, with a decreased odds of 0.73. Substance use disorder prevalence was not different between scarring and non-scarring alopecia. This may be the result of patients fearing exacerbation of hair loss, or due to increased mental health and community support in patients with alopecia. Dermatologists and primary care providers should continue to promote psychotherapy and community support to patients whose diagnosis of alopecia has a negative psychosocial impact.

Treatment of Acne Scars with Microneedling and Chemical Reconstruction of Scarred Skin Therapy (CROSS) Using Penol/Croton Oil Combination.

BACKGROUND: Microneedling has been shown to release growth factors, which improves the appearance of acne scars by itself and in combination with different therapy modalities. Combining microneedling with Chemical Reconstruction of Scarred Skin (CROSS) therapy using a 60% phenol and 0.2% croton oil combination results in a significant improvement of acne scarring. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of combination treatments using microneedling in combination with CROSS therapy that contains 60% phenol and 0.2% croton preparation in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III to V.  Materials and Methods: Patients were treated over a 5-year period for atrophic acne scars using microneedling combined with CROSS. Most of the patients had combination atrophic scarring. High-quality before and after photographs were taken of the patients to assess the improvement in the scars.  Results: Most of the patients (89.5%) had Fitzpatrick skin types IV through V.  Analysis was done on a maximum of 3 microneedling sessions with 1 to 3 CROSS sessions. Photographic evaluation using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale showed an 18% grade-1 improvement and 81% grade-2 improvement. The Goodman and Baron Qualitative scar grading system showed a 62% grade-1 improvement and 38% grade-2 improvement. CONCLUSION: Combination treatments work best for atrophic scars. This is the first published report of using microneedling with a 60% phenol/0.2% croton oil combination. It proved to be very effective and safe in treating atrophic acne scars in Fitzpatrick skin types III to V, with minimal side effects and a quick recovery. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):418-422.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7657.

Subcision with and without suction for acne scars: a split-faced, rater-blinded randomized control trial.

Therapeutic options for acne scars include subcision and suction with microdermabrasion, but these treatment modalities have not been studied in conjunction. To compare effectiveness of subcision alone versus subcision with suction for the treatment of facial acne scars. Randomized, split-faced, evaluator-blinded control trial. Participants underwent one subcision treatment on both sides of the face followed by 10 sessions of suction to one side. Photographs at baseline, 1-month, and 4-months were assessed. Primary outcome measures were the validated Acne Scar Severity Scale (ASSS) (0 = no acne scarring, 4 = severe), Acne Scar Improvement Grading Scale (ASIGS) (-100 to 100%), and modified Quantitative Global Scarring Grades (QGSG) (point-based questionnaire instrument), as well as subject preference. Twenty-eight treatment areas and 154 treatments were analyzed. Dermatologist raters found no differences between subcision alone and subcision-suction at 1-month or 4-months. Mean subject-assessed percent improvement for subcision-suction was higher than that for subcision alone at 1-month (37% versus 24%, p = 0.04) but not at 4-months (p = 0.37). Subjects preferred combination therapy to monotherapy at 1-month (50% vs. 21%) and 4-months (43% vs. 21%). While blinded raters did not detect significant differences, subjects perceived combination treatment as working more quickly than monotherapy, and preferred combination treatment at all time points.Clinical trial registration NCT01696513 on Clinicaltrials.gov.

Malignant melanoma arising in a burn scar.

Secondary malignancies are rare but devastating complications of longstanding burn scars. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common, followed by basal cell carcinoma and melanomas. There are fewer than 50 total reported cases of malignant melanomas arising in burn scars. We report a case of malignant melanoma arising within a longstanding burn scar confirmed by histology, FISH, and PRAME staining to further characterize melanomas arising in burn scars and to illustrate the diagnostic challenges they present.

Intramural needle ablation or repeated standard ablation in patients referred for repeat ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: When ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurs after standard RF ablation (sRFA) some patients benefit from repeat sRFA, whereas others warrant advanced methods such as intramural needle ablation (INA). Our objectives are to assess the utility of repeat sRFA and to clarify the benefit of INA when repeat sRFA fails in patients with VT due to structural heart disease. METHODS: In consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled in a study for INA for recurrent sustained monomorphic VT despite sRFA, repeat sRFA was considered first. INA was performed during the same procedure if repeat sRFA failed or no targets for sRFA were identified. RESULTS: Of 85 patients enrolled, acute success with repeat sRFA was achieved in 30 patients (35%), and during the 6-month follow-up, 87% (20/23) were free of VT hospitalization, 78% were free of any VT, and 7 were lost to follow-up. INA was performed in 55 patients (65%) after sRFA failed, or no endocardial targets were found abolished or modified inducible VT in 35/55 patients (64%). During follow-up, 72% (39/54) were free of VT hospitalization, 41% were free of any VT, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Overall, 59 out of 77 (77%) patients were free of hospitalization and 52% were free of any VT. Septal-origin VTs were more likely to need INA, whereas RV and papillary muscle VTs were less likely to require INA. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat sRFA was beneficial in 23% (18/77) of patients with recurrent sustained VT who were referred for INA. The availability of INA increased favorable outcomes to 52%.

Treatment of erythematous acne scars using 595-nm pulsed dye laser combined with 1565-nm ResurFX nonablative fractional laser.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory disease associated with various sequelae after skin lesion remission. Acne erythema has been considered simple erythema or a vascular lesion; however, because the understanding of this disease has improved, acne erythema is currently considered an early scar with erythematous components. AIMS: This study evaluated the efficacy of using both a 595-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) and 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser (NAFL) for the treatment of erythematous scars caused by acne. METHODS: Ninety patients with acne scars were equally randomized to two groups. Group A (n = 45) received treatment with the NAFL. Group B (n = 45) received treatment with the PDL and NAFL. Each patient underwent one treatment session and 4 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: Qualitative (χ2 = 12.415; p < 0.05) and quantitative (t = 2.675; p < 0.05) scores of Groups A and B were determined using a global scarring grading system and exhibited statistically significant differences. The quantitative score of Group A was higher than that of Group B (6.67 ± 3.46 vs. 4.98 ± 2.44). The erythema areas of the groups differed significantly after treatment, with Group B exhibiting more notable score improvements (5.00 [3.10, 7.10] vs. 2.80 [1.65, 4.60]; Z = 3.072; p < 0.05). The erythema regression rate of Group B (88.9%) was significantly higher than that of Group A (66.7%) (χ2 = 20.295; p < 0.001). Adverse events, including redness and swelling (86.6%), scabbing (78.8%), and purpura (36.6%), occurred within 7 days for 86.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of the PDL and NAFL is safe and effective for erythematous acne scars.

Surpoint algorithm for improved guidance of ablation for ventricular tachycardia (SURFIRE-VT): A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: The utility of ablation index (AI) to guide ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in patients with structural heart disease is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes achieved using AI-guided strategy (target value 550) or conventional non-AI-guided parameters in patients undergoing scar-related VT ablation. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 103) undergoing initial VT ablation at a single center from 2017 to 2022 were evaluated. Patient groups were 1:1 propensity-matched for baseline characteristics. Single lesion characteristics for all 4707 lesions in the matched cohort (n = 74) were analyzed. The impact of ablation characteristics was assessed by linear regression and clinical outcomes were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: After propensity-matching, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between AI (n = 37) and non-AI (n = 37) groups. Lesion sets were similar (scar homogenization [41% vs. 27%; p = .34], scar dechanneling [19% vs. 8%; p = .18], core isolation [5% vs. 11%; p = .4], linear and elimination late potentials/local abnormal ventricular activities [35% vs. 44%; p = .48], epicardial mapping/ablation [11% vs. 14%; p = .73]). AI-guided strategy had 21% lower procedure duration (-47.27 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-81.613, -12.928]; p = .008), 49% lower radiofrequency time per lesion (-13.707 s, 95% CI [-17.86, -9.555]; p < .001), 21% lower volume of fluid administered (1664 cc [1127, 2209] vs. 2126 cc [1750, 2593]; p = .005). Total radiofrequency duration (-339 s [-24%], 95%CI [-776, 62]; p = .09) and steam pops (-155.6%, 95% CI [19.8%, -330.9%]; p = .08) were nonsignificantly lower in the AI group. Acute procedural success (95% vs. 89%; p = .7) and VT recurrence (0.97, 95% CI [0.42-2.2]; p = .93) were similar for both groups. Lesion analysis (n = 4707) demonstrated a plateau in the magnitude of impedance drops once reaching an AI of 550-600. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, an AI-guided ablation strategy for scar-related VT resulted in shorter procedure time and average radiofrequency time per lesion with similar acute procedural and intermediate-term clinical outcomes to a non-AI-guided approach utilizing traditional ablation parameters.

The Medial Canthus Fibrous Band's Impact on Epicanthal Fold Severity and Classification in Asians: Implications for Epicanthoplasty.

BACKGROUND: The epicanthal fold (EF) is a semilunar skin fold located in the medial canthus in most Asians. The medial canthus fibrous band (MCFB) reportedly plays a critical role in EF formation. Variations in MCFB shape and size affect the severity and type of EF. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze MCFB variations in different types and severities of EF and explore the effect of the MCFB resection epicanthoplasty technique (MCFB epicanthoplasty). METHODS: Surgical videos of 40 patients undergoing MCFB epicanthoplasty in our department were reviewed. The MCFB (area), transverse dimension, vertical dimension, upper eyelid direction length (UEDL), and lower eyelid direction length (LEDL) were measured. For aesthetic assessment, 37 patients were followed up for 6 months; intercanthal distance (ICD) and horizontal lid fissure length (HLFL) were measured. Preoperative and postoperative ICD/HLFL ratios were compared. Postoperative scar recovery was evaluated with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The MCFB diameter and area were larger for severe EF than for moderate EF (P < .01). Patients with severe EF had larger LEDL than UEDL (P < .01). The tarsalis type had a larger LEDL than the palpebralis type with the same severity (P < .01). MCFB epicanthoplasty yielded favorable postoperative cosmetic effects and scar recovery. Postoperative ICD decreased, while HLFL increased compared to preoperative values (P < .001). The ICD/HLFL ratio was significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (P < .001). Postoperative ICD/HLFL ratio was 1.2:1. CONCLUSIONS: The MCFB affects the severity and type of EF. MCFB epicanthoplasty effectively corrected moderate to severe EF.

Effect of Laser and Energy-based Device Therapies to Minimize Surgical Scar Formation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Utilization of lasers and energy-based devices for surgical scar minimization has been substantially evaluated in placebo-controlled trials. The aim of this study was to compare reported measures of efficacy of lasers and energy-based devices in clinical trials in preventing surgical scar formation in a systematic review and network meta-analyses. Five electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library, were searched to retrieve relevant articles. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials that reported on clinical outcomes of surgical scars with treatment initiation no later than 6 months after surgery and a follow-up period of at least 3 months. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials involving 482 participants and 671 postsurgical wounds were included in the network meta-analyses. The results showed that the most efficacious treatments were achieved using low-level laser therapy) (weighted mean difference -3.78; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -6.32, -1.24) and pulsed dye laser (weighted mean difference -2.46; 95% CI -4.53, -0.38). Nevertheless, low-level laser therapy and pulsed dye laser demonstrated comparable outcomes in surgical scar minimization (weighted mean difference -1.32, 95% CI -3.53, 0.89). The findings of this network meta-analyses suggest that low-level laser therapy and pulsed dye laser are both effective treatments for minimization of scar formation following primary closure of surgical wounds with comparable treatment outcomes.

Evaluation of microneedling depth of penetration in management of atrophic acne scars: a split-face comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Microneedling is a technique of repeated puncturing or drilling of the skin to induce repair and collagen induction. There are many reported important factors determining the efficacy of microneedling treatment. The extent of injury needed to produce the desired effect in each condition is one of these important factors. OBJECTIVES: We designed the present split-face comparative study to evaluate the use and effectiveness of two different depths of penetration of Dermapen needles in the management of atrophic postacne scars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study involved 14 subjects with atrophic postacne scars. In each patient, both sides of the face were treated with six sessions of microneedling, using Dermapen at 2-week intervals. A split-face study design was performed. The right (Rt) side of the face was treated with Dermapen using 2.5 mm needle length, while the left (Lt) side was treated using 1.5 mm needle length. RESULTS: There was a significantly better percentage of improvement of acne scars on the Rt side of the face compared to the Lt side (P = 0.02) after six sessions. Both sides of the face showed improvement of collagen bundles and elastic fibers characteristics after six sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 2.5 mm depth proved to be more effective both clinically and histologically in the management of atrophic postacne scars.

Predictive value of abdominal wall scar score for pelvic floor function rehabilitation, vaginal microecology and complications after cesarean section.

Objective: To explore the predictive value of the abdominal wall scar score for pelvic floor function rehabilitation, vaginal microecology and complications after cesarean section. Methods: A total of 120 pregnant women who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from January to December 2022 were selected. The patients were divided into observation group (score ≥ 60, n = 52) and control group (score < 60, n = 68) according to the preoperative score of abdominal wall scar and whether the score exceeded 60. The pelvic floor function rehabilitation, vaginal microecology and complications were compared between the two groups, and the score of abdominal wall scar was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The predictive value of pelvic floor function rehabilitation, vaginal microecology and complications after cesarean section was evaluated. Results: There were significant differences between the two groups in postpartum class I and class II muscle fiber strength and pelvic floor muscle potential (P < 0.05). ROC curve showed that the AUC of abdominal scar score in predicting pelvic floor function rehabilitation was 0.806 (95% CI [0.684-0.927]), the specificity was 80.17%, and the sensitivity was 79.76%. There was significant difference in the abnormal rate of leukocte estrase (LE) and Acetylaminoglucosidase (NAG) between the two groups (P < 0.05). ROC curve showed that the AUC of abdominal scar score in predicting vaginal microecology was 0.871 (95% CI [0.776-0.966]), the specificity was 85.09%, and the sensitivity was 82.36%. There was significant difference in the incidence of postpartum complications between the two groups (P < 0.05). ROC curve showed that the AUC of abdominal scar score in predicting complications was 0.844 (95% CI [0.735-0.953]), the specificity was 82.27%, and the sensitivity was 81.15%. Conclusion: The abdominal scar score has a certain effect on predicting the recovery of pelvic floor function, vaginal microecology and complications after cesarean section. Therefore, it can help the medical staff to adjust the treatment measures in time, which can be used as a means of preoperative auxiliary examination.

Value of genotyping and scar-phenotyping for VT ablation procedures in patients with nonischemic left ventricular cardiomyopathies.

INTRODUCTION: Variants of cardiomyopathy genes in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) generate various phenotypes of cardiac scar and delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) imaging which may impact ventricular tachycardia (VT) management. METHODS: The objective was to compare the findings of cardiomyopathy genetic testing on DE-CMR imaging and long-term outcomes among patients with NICM undergoing VT ablation procedures. Image phenotyping and genotyping were performed in a consecutive series of patients referred for VT ablation and correlated to survival free of VT. Scar depth index (SDI) (% of scar at 0-3 mm, 3-5 mm and >5 mm projected on the closest endocardial surface) was determined. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included (11 women, 55 ± 14 years, ejection fraction (EF) 45 ± 16%) and were followed for 3.4 ± 2.9 years. Pathogenic variants (PV) were identified in 16 patients (37%) in the following genes: LMNA (n = 5), TTN (n = 5), DSP (n = 2), AMLS1 (n = 1), MYBPC3 (n = 1), PLN (n = 1), and SCN5A (n = 1). A ring-like septal scar (RLSS) pattern was more often seen in patients with pathogenic variants (66% vs 15%, p = .001). RLSS was associated with deeper seated scars (SDI >5 mm 30.6 ± 22.6% vs 12.4 ± 16.2%, p = .005), and increased VT recurrence (HR 5.7 95% CI[1.8-18.4], p = .003). After adjustment for age, sex, EF, and total scar burden, the presence of a PV remained independently associated with worse outcomes (HR 4.7 95% CI[1.22-18.0], p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedural genotyping and scar phenotyping is beneficial to identify patients with a favorable procedural outcome. Some PVs are associated with an intramural, deeper seated scar phenotype and have an increase of VT recurrence after ablation.

Treatment of uterine scar cystoid diverticulum by hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To report a patient with prolonged intermenstrual bleeding and a cystic mass at a cesarean scar treated with laparoscopic folding sutures and hysteroscopic canalization. DESIGN: A 4.0 cm-cystic mass formed at the uterine scar caused continuous menstrual blood outflow in the diverticulum and was treated with hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: A 38-year-old woman of childbearing age who had undergone two cesarean sections and two abortions reported vaginal bleeding for 10 years, which began shortly after the second cesarean section. Curettage was performed, but no abnormality was found. The patient unsuccessfully tried to manage her symptoms with traditional Chinese medicine and hormone drugs. The muscular layer of the lower end of the anterior wall of the uterus was weak, and there were cystic masses on the right side. INTERVENTION: The bladder was stripped from the lower uterine segment under laparoscopy, and the surrounding tissue of the mass at the uterine scar was separated. The position of the cesarean scar defect was identified by hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy, and the relationship between the uterine mass and surrounding tissues was analyzed. An electric cutting ring resection on both sides of the obstruction was performed to eliminate the valve effect. The active intima of the scar diverticulum was destroyed by electrocoagulation, followed by laparoscopic treatment of the uterine scar diverticulum mass. An intraoperative tumor incision revealed visible bloody fluid mixed with intimal material. The uterine scar diverticulum defect was repaired using 1-0 absorbable barbed continuous full-thickness mattress fold sutures. Finally, the bilateral round ligament length was adjusted so that the uterus tilted forward. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recovery of menstruation and anatomy of the uterine isthmus. RESULTS: The operation was successful, and the postoperative recovery was fast. There was no interphase bleeding at the 1-month follow-up, and the uterine scar diverticulum was repaired, with the thickness of the uterine scar muscle layer increasing to 0.91 cm. CONCLUSION: The simple, straightforward procedure to resolve the abnormal cystic, solid mass formed because of the continuous deposition of blood in the uterine scar diverticulum involved laparoscopic folding and docking sutures combined with hysteroscopic canal opening.

Fractional picosecond laser for atrophic acne scars: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conventional fractional lasers (FLs) are well-established treatments for acne scars with some inevitable adverse events. Fractional picosecond laser (FPL) is increasingly used for acne scars. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of FPL with non-picosecond FLs for acne scars. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched. We also searched ClinicalTrials, WHO ICTRP, and ISRCTN websites. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the clinical improvement and adverse events after FPL compared with other FLs. RESULTS: Overall, seven eligible studies were included. Three physician evaluation systems showed no difference between FPL and other FLs in clinical improvement of atrophic acne scars (MD = 0.64, 95% CI:-9.67 to 10.94; MD = -0.14, 95% CI:-0.71 to 0.43; RR = 0.81, 95% CI:0.32 to 2.01). Patient-assessed effectiveness was also not significantly different between FPL and other FLs (RR = 1.00, 95% CI:0.69 to 1.46). Although temporary pinpoint bleeding was more common after FPL (RR = 30.33, 95% CI:6.14 to 149.8), the incidence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) and pain level were lower for FPL (RR = 0.16, 95% CI:0.06 to 0.45; MD = -1.99, 95% CI:-3.36 to -0.62). Additionally, edema severity after treatment did not differ between the two groups (MD = -0.35, 95% CI:-0.72 to 0.02). As for the duration of erythema, no difference between FPL and nonablative FL groups (MD = -1.88, 95% CI:-6.28 to 2.51). CONCLUSIONS: FPL seems similar to other FLs regarding clinical improvement of atrophic acne scars. With lower PIH risk and pain scores, FPL is more suitable for acne scar patients prone to PIH or sensitive to pain.

Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Uterine closure technique can affect scar healing, potentially resulting in unfavorable gynecologic and life-threatening obstetrical outcomes. Double-layer continuous unlocked suture has been demonstrated to promote optimal residual myometrial thickness. Recently, the purse-string uterine suture technique has emerged as a viable method to enhance the healing of scars. However, the current lack of randomized trials assessing the relevance of this technique warrants further investigation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of purse-string uterine sutures on scar healing after cesarean delivery when compared with double-layer continuous unlocked suture. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial; 126 patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing primary cesarean delivery were enrolled in 2 groups. The primary outcome was the mean residual myometrial thickness measured by saline infusion sonography 6 months after surgery by 2 sonographers blinded to uterine closure techniques. Operative time, calculated blood loss, total number of needed threads, and perioperative scar width were used for the perioperative analysis. Healing ratio and cesarean scar defect measurements were used for the 6-month analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of residual myometrial thickness (9.38±2.3 vs 8.4±3.9 mm; P=.187), blood loss (540 [146-982] vs 495 [241-903] mL; P=.815), or operative time (6.2 [5.2-7] vs 6 [5.3-7] minutes; P=.977). Achievement of purse-string uterine suture required significantly fewer threads (1 [1-1] vs 2 [1-2]; P<.001) and fewer hemostatic complementary sutures (1 [1-1] vs 1 [1-2]; P=.013). Scar width was significantly lower with purse-string uterine sutures (50 [40.5-50.5] vs 70 [60-70.5] mm; P<.0001). Purse-string uterine sutures allowed a higher healing ratio (1 [0.9-1] vs 0.84 [0.59-1]; P=.003) and significantly fewer cesarean scar defects (12% vs 35%; P=.018) compared with double-layer continuous unlocked suture. CONCLUSION: Despite resulting in no difference in residual myometrial thickness, purse-string uterine closure seems to be associated with better uterine scar healing on the basis of a higher healing ratio, and a lower rate of cesarean scar defects compared with double-layer continuous unlocked suture.

Development and validation of a risk assessment scale for pathological scarring.

To develop a risk assessment scale for pathological scarring and validate its psychometric properties. This was a methodological study. Researchers developed the scale based on a literature review, qualitative study and Delphi expert consultation. Subsequently, 409 patients participated in the study to test the psychometric properties of the scale. We evaluated construct validity, content validity, internal consistency reliability, and interrater reliability. The researchers developed a scale consisting of three dimensions and 12 items. Factor analysis extracted a total of four common factors that accounted for 62.22% of the total variance. The results revealed that the item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.67 to 1, while the scale-content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.82. Internal consistency reliability: Cronbach's α of the items ranged from 0.67 to 0.76, while Cronbach's α of the whole scale was 0.74. Interrater reliability: the Kappa number was 0.73. The final scale showed adequate construct validity, content validity, and reliability. It is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to identify patients with a risk of pathological scarring. Further study is needed to confirm the scale's validity and reliability in other settings and populations.