Stability Studies of Antipyocyanic Beta-Lactam Antibiotics Used in Continuous Infusion.

In intensive care, beta-lactams can be reconstituted in 50 mL polypropylene syringes with NaCl 0.9 % and administered for 8 to 12 h at various concentrations with motor-operated syringe pumps. The feasibility and/or the stability of these antibiotic therapies are often poorly known by clinicians. The purpose of this study was to determine the stability of seven antipyocyanic beta-lactam antibiotics and cilastatin under real-life conditions. Stability indicating HPLC methods allowing quantification in pharmaceutical preparations and subsequent stability studies were performed. The stability studies showed that continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam 80/10 mg/mL, of cefepime 20 and 40 mg/mL and of aztreonam 40 and 120 mg/mL can be used over 12 h. Moreover, continuous infusion of cefepime 120 mg/mL can be used over 10 h, whereas meropenem 10 and 20 mg/mL and ceftazidime 40 mg/mL remained stable only over 8 h, and meropenem 40 mg/mL was significantly degraded after 6 h. Finally, imipenem/cilastatin 5/5 mg/mL and piperacillin/tazobactam 320/40 mg/mL should not be used as continuous infusion. These data allow the establishment of protocols of administration of antipyocyanic beta-lactams by continuous infusion. Some of them are not appropriate to this mode of administration (imipenem/cilastatin, piperacillin/ tazobactam 320/40 mg/mL) or must be avoided if possible (ceftazidime 40 mg/mL).

Nontherapeutic equivalence of a generic product of imipenem-cilastatin is caused more by chemical instability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (imipenem) than by its substandard amount of cilastatin.

BACKGROUND: We demonstrated therapeutic nonequivalence of "bioequivalent" generics for meropenem, but there is no data with generics of other carbapenems. METHODS: One generic product of imipenem-cilastatin was compared with the innovator in terms of in vitro susceptibility testing, pharmaceutical equivalence, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) equivalence in the neutropenic mouse thigh, lung and brain infection models. Both pharmaceutical forms were then subjected to analytical chemistry assays (LC/MS). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The generic product had 30% lower concentration of cilastatin compared with the innovator of imipenem-cilastatin. Regarding the active pharmaceutical ingredient (imipenem), we found no differences in MIC, MBC, concentration or potency or AUC, confirming equivalence in terms of in vitro activity. However, the generic failed therapeutic equivalence in all three animal models. Its Emax against S. aureus in the thigh model was consistently lower, killing from 0.1 to 7.3 million less microorganisms per gram in 24 hours than the innovator (P = 0.003). Against K. pneumoniae in the lung model, the generic exhibited a conspicuous Eagle effect fitting a Gaussian equation instead of the expected sigmoid curve of the Hill model. In the brain infection model with P. aeruginosa, the generic failed when bacterial growth was >4 log10 CFU/g in 24 hours, but not if it was less than 2.5 log10 CFU/g. These large differences in the PD profile cannot be explained by the lower concentration of cilastatin, and rather suggested a failure attributable to the imipenem constituent of the generic product. Analytical chemistry assays confirmed that, besides having 30% less cilastatin, the generic imipenem was more acidic, less stable, and exhibited four different degradation masses that were absent in the innovator.