BaByVFSSImP© A Novel Measurement Tool for Videofluoroscopic Assessment of Swallowing Impairment in Bottle-Fed Babies: Establishing a Standard.

AIM: This investigation tested the construct validity of the first standardized assessment tool, the BaByVFSS Impairment Profile, (BaByVFSSImP©), developed for the quantification of swallowing observations made from videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) in bottle-fed babies. METHOD: Construct validity of the measures was tested using descriptive methods and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of swallowing scores obtained from a cohort of bottle-fed babies (median age 3 months 1 day, interquartile range 1 month 4 days-7 months 4 days) sequentially referred for VFSS based on clinical signs, symptoms, or risk factors associated with dysphagia and/or aspiration. Main outcome measures were emergence of functional domains derived from swallowing component impairment scores. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in 21 significant components (factor loadings ≥ 0.5) grouping into five functional domains labeled for common contribution to overall swallowing function. The tool was organized into the BaByVFSSImP. Clinical relevance was explored using correlational analyses between domain scores, maximum penetration/aspiration scores, feeding status, and caregiver burden. INTERPRETATION: Quantification of physiologic swallowing impairment captured by BaByVFSSImP holds promise for identification of physiologically based targets for intervention, clinical decisions regarding enteral feeding, and tracking the trajectory of swallowing impairment throughout development in young children.

Improving the Diagnostic Capability of the Modified Barium Swallow Study Through Standardization of an Esophageal Sweep Protocol.

The modified  barium swallow (MBS) study is a videofluoroscopic evaluation of oropharyngeal swallow function. Esophageal imaging is not routinely performed during an MBS, and few guidelines for implementation or interpretation exist. Aims of the current investigation were to (1) delineate the percentage of normal, oropharyngeal, esophageal, and mixed swallowing dysfunction, (2) develop operational definitions for rating our standardization cursory view of esophageal bolus flow, and (3) determine inter-rater reliability between speech pathology (SLP) and physician raters for categorizing esophageal abnormalities. A two-phase retrospective review of 358 patient charts and MBS studies was conducted. Esophageal bolus flow was operationally defined as (1) normal, (2) anatomic abnormality, (3) dysmotility and (4) combined. Descriptive statistics, a Chi square with alpha set at 0.05, and Kappa analysis were performed. Esophageal dysfunction was identified in 80 (26%) patients and included: anatomic abnormality (69%), dysmotility (17%), and combined abnormality (14%). Phase one reliability testing yielded fair agreement between SLP and MD raters k = 0.5. Following revision of definitions and consensus training, phase two reliability testing resulted in excellent agreement between the same raters k = 0.9. Multiphase or primary esophageal dysphagia was found in 26% of our sample using a standardized protocol rating esophageal bolus flow from the upper esophageal sphincter through the lower esophageal sphincter during the MBS. Improved agreement between SLP and MD raters after definition revision and training suggests these operational definitions are concise, objective and reliable. An expanded MBS study may lead to early identification of esophageal disorders, encourage multidisciplinary patient care, and improve patient health outcomes.

Cinefluoroscopic assessment of mechanical disc prostheses: its value as a complementary method to echocardiography.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Many types of mechanical prostheses are used for heart valve replacement, but it is difficult to distinguish between them using transthoracic echocardiography. Hence, cinefluoroscopy complements the echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac prostheses. The aims of the present study were to: (i) describe the contribution of cinefluoroscopy in identifying different prostheses; (ii) compare gradients obtained by Doppler echocardiography with the opening angle of the discs assessed by cinefluoroscopy; and (iii) assess the ability of cinefluoroscopy to distinguish normal from dysfunctional prostheses. METHODS: A total of 229 mechanical disc prostheses was prospectively evaluated with cinefluoroscopy. Eight prosthetic valves (six aortic, two mitral) were excluded due to the coexistence of severe left ventricular dysfunction. Thus, the final analysis comprised 221 prosthetic valves (146 aortic, 75 mitral). RESULTS: Based on the characteristics of the ring and the discs, cinefluoroscopy identified 87 single-leaflet and 134 bileaflet prostheses. Disc motion allowed distinction to be made between normal and dysfunctional prostheses (opening angle: 74 +/- 13 degrees versus 49 +/- 18 degrees). Fluoroscopy could not define disc profile or the ring in 6% of aortic valves and in 26% of mitral prostheses. The technique could be used to identify the TriTechnologies and HP-Biplus valves, but could not provide data on prosthetic function due to radiolucency of the discs. Among the 146 aortic prostheses, Doppler echocardiography helped to identify 109 normal valves and 37 dysfunctional valves. Among 75 mitral prostheses, 54 normal and 21 dysfunctional prosthetic valves were identified. When both methods were correlated, the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of fluoroscopy to distinguish normal from malfunctioning prostheses were 83%, 80%, 89%, and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Each prosthesis type has radioscopic characteristics that allow its identification. Fluoroscopy permitted rapid and easy evaluation of mechanical prosthetic valve function, and in most cases allowed a distinction to be made between normal and dysfunctional prostheses. The presence of high gradients by Doppler echocardiography, with normal opening angles by fluoroscopy, and without pannus on transesophageal echocardiography, is indicative of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Fluoroscopy was superior to echocardiography in identifying disc motion, whilst Doppler study allowed the measurement of gradients and areas, and semiquantification of regurgitation. Thus, cinefluooscopy rapidly provides valuable information which is complementary to that obtained by echocardiography.

High-dose fluoroscopy: the administrator's responsibilities.

During the past 15 years, developments in x-ray technologies have substantially improved the ability of practitioners to treat patients using fluoroscopically guided interventional techniques. Many of these procedures require a greater use of fluoroscopy and serial imaging (cine). This has increased the potential for radiation-induced dermatitis, epilation and severe radiation-induced burns to patients. Radiology administrators must realize that these high-dose procedures increase the risk for radiation injury and radiation-induced cancer in personnel as well as in patients. This article discusses particular clinical cases and describes positive, pro-active steps that practitioners and administrators can take to help prevent such injuries in their facilities. Unfortunately, with the exception of radiologists, a large proportion of physicians who use fluoroscopy have effectively no training or credentials in management of radiation or the biological effects associated with its use. In 1994, an FDA advisory warned that training of physicians for modern-day use of the fluoroscope was for the most part insufficient and needed to be expanded. Many prominent medical organizations such as the American College of Cardiology (14) and the American Heart Association (15) have published strongly worded position papers agreeing that there is an urgent need for such training. The consensus is that "rubber-stamp" privileges (16,17) to perform fluoroscopic procedures should no longer be granted. At present, the JCAHO is considering the implementation of a statement regarding JCAHO standards and privileges for practitioners to use fluoroscopic x-ray equipment. Whether or not the JCAHO becomes involved, it is becoming increasingly clear that all practitioners who use fluoroscopic radiation should be required to complete focused training in radiation physics, radiation biology and radiation safety. Training should include the pertinent aspects of radiation management in the clinical setting so that these physicians will be able to acceptably control risks to patients and personnel. The task of securing these materials and lecturers and documenting everything may fall on the shoulders of the radiology administrator or radiation safety staff. Completion of an approved educational program (with appropriate testing) provides the evidence needed by the facility to approve the practitioner's qualifications. In summary, it will take a concerted effort on the part of professional medical organizations and regulatory agencies to insure that the wealth of preventative information now available is disseminated to and put to use by these physicians who may fail to fully appreciate the potential for imparting serious injury to their patients. Even one radiation injury caused by lack of education is unacceptable.

Analysis of biliary drainage in the caudate lobe of the liver: comparison of three-dimensional CT cholangiography and rotating cine cholangiography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the bile duct anatomy of the caudate lobe without disease involvement with use of three-dimensional (3D) cholangiography and to compare the usefulness of this technique with that of rotating cine cholangiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 12 patients with obstructive jaundice but without lesions at the hepatic hilum who underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, serial examination was performed with cine cholangiography and helical computed tomography (CT). From helical CT scans, 3D cholangiograms were reconstructed. Cine and 3D cholangiograms were evaluated and compared simultaneously. RESULTS: In the 12 patients, 40 branches of the caudate lobe were detected with 3D cholangiography (mean, 3.3 branches per patient), while 31 were detected with cine cholangiography (mean, 2.6 branches per patient). The difference in detection rate was significant (P < .01). Nine (23%) of 40 branches were detected with 3D cholangiography alone, and all 31 branches detected with cine cholangiography were also detected with 3D cholangiography. CONCLUSION: 3D cholangiography was superior to cine cholangiography in assessment of bile duct anatomy of the caudate lobe of the liver because 3D cholangiography eliminated the overlap of different branches of the bile duct.

Evaluation of a standardised questionnaire for the detection of dysphagia in 69 dogs.

The diagnosis of dysphagia in the dog requires an evaluation of a variety of signs that can be caused not only by a 'swallowing disorder' but also by several other pathological conditions. Most owners mention coughing, vomiting, regurgitation and nasal discharge, and the clinician must decide whether these signs are related to dysphagia. In this study a standardised questionnaire for the diagnosis and localisation of dysphagia was evaluated for its accuracy by comparing the results with contrast videofluorography as the definitive standard. The purpose of the study was to optimise the selection of dogs for more expensive diagnostic procedures such as videofluorography and electromyography. In a group of 69 dogs with 'swallowing problems' the questionnaire had a sensitivity of 0.97 and a positive predictive value of 0.94 for dysphagia in general. The questionnaire was also useful for the exclusion of oral phase dysphagia, with a specificity of 0.70 and a negative predictive value of 0.97. Most dogs with pharyngeal phase dysphagia could be detected by using the questionnaire (sensitivity 0.91). The questionnaire was not of specific value for the detection or exclusion of oesophageal phase dysphagia, for which it had a sensitivity of 0.69, a specificity of 0.57 and predictive values for positive and negative tests of 0.79 and 0.44, respectively.

Factors influencing accuracy in left ventricular volume determination.

The accuracy with which left ventricular volume is determined from contrast ventriculograms depends on the care with which the analysis protocol is followed. Therefore, the effect of variations in the method used for calculating the correction factor (CF) that adjusts for magnification and image distortion on volume calculation was measured. The results showed that error in the CF is caused by (in order of decreasing importance): filming the calibration figure at a different magnification mode from that of the ventriculogram, at a different height from the table than the level of the ventricle, or with the image intensifier at a different height than used during ventriculography; use of a calibration figure less than half the size of the ventricle; calculation of the CF from only 1 band pair of a banded catheter; or placement of the calibration figure at the periphery rather than the center of the imaging field. Error in volume determination was proportional to error in the CF. With care, the error in volume can be reduced to that due to interobserver variability in tracing the endocardial contours.

Right ventricular volume: cine vs CT measurements.

The volumes of 15 human right ventricular cast specimens were analyzed by computed tomography (CT) and compared with reference volumes and the values obtained by cineradiography. CT volumes were more accurate than those determined by cineradiography. The mean deviation between CT and reference volumes was 3.4%. The differences between cineradiographic values and reference volumes were 14 and 17%, respectively, for the 60 degree LAO projection, area-length method, and biplane 30 degree RAO/60 degree LAO projection, according to the Ferlinz method. The CT and cineradiographic volumes differed significantly in our experiment.