Comparison of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to preoperative antibiotics in patients labeled as penicillin allergic.

BACKGROUND: Cefazolin is routinely recommended as the first-line agent for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis because it prevents more surgical site infections than second-line antibiotics. Clinicians often avoid administering cefazolin to patients who are labeled as penicillin allergic due to concerns of cross-reactivity. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions between cefazolin and the second-line antibiotics vancomycin and clindamycin. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who were labeled as penicillin allergic and received either cefazolin, clindamycin, or vancomycin as preoperative antibiotics. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypersensitivity reactions. RESULTS: A total of 734 surgical procedures in 690 patients were included. Fifteen immediate hypersensitivity reactions were identified. Probable hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 3 (0.9%) patients in the cefazolin group, 4 (1.4%) in the clindamycin group, and 1 (1.1%) in the vancomycin group. Seven of 8 patients reported allergies to additional medications beyond penicillin. There were seven cases of possible hypersensitivity reactions, 3 (0.9%) in the cefazolin group, 1 (1.1%) in the vancomycin group, and 3 (1.0%) in the clindamycin group. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that perioperative hypersensitivity reactions are uncommon in patients labeled as penicillin allergic. The frequency of immediate hypersensitivity reactions was not different between patients receiving cefazolin, clindamycin, or vancomycin. Avoiding cefazolin in patients labeled as penicillin allergic may not be warranted.

Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) affects 4% to 12% of women of reproductive age. The main intervention for acute PID is broad-spectrum antibiotics administered intravenously, intramuscularly or orally. We assessed the optimal treatment regimen for PID.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic regimens to treat PID. SEARCH METHODS: In January 2020, we searched the Cochrane Sexually Transmitted Infections Review Group's Specialized Register, which included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1944 to 2020, located through hand and electronic searching; CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; four other databases; and abstracts in selected publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs comparing antibiotics with placebo or other antibiotics for the treatment of PID in women of reproductive age, either as inpatient or outpatient treatment. We limited our review to a comparison of drugs in current use that are recommended by the 2015 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for treatment of PID. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias and conducted GRADE assessments of the quality of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 39 RCTs (6894 women) in this review, adding two new RCTs at this update. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to high, the main limitations being serious risk of bias (due to poor reporting of study methods and lack of blinding), serious inconsistency, and serious imprecision. None of the studies reported quinolones and cephalosporins, or the outcomes laparoscopic evidence of resolution of PID based on physician opinion or fertility outcomes. Length of stay results were insufficiently reported for analysis. Regimens containing azithromycin versus regimens containing doxycycline We are uncertain whether there was a clinically relevant difference between azithromycin and doxycycline in rates of cure for mild-moderate PID (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.55; 2 RCTs, 243 women; I2 = 72%; very low-quality evidence). The analyses may result in little or no difference between azithromycin and doxycycline in rates of severe PID (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05; 1 RCT, 309 women; low-quality evidence), or adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.34; 3 RCTs, 552 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). In a sensitivity analysis limited to a single study at low risk of bias, azithromycin probably improves the rates of cure in mild-moderate PID (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.67; 133 women; moderate-quality evidence), compared to doxycycline.  Regimens containing quinolone versus regimens containing cephalosporin The analysis shows there may be little or no clinically relevant difference between quinolones and cephalosporins in rates of cure for mild-moderate PID (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14; 4 RCTs, 772 women; I2 = 15%; low-quality evidence), or severe PID (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.23; 2 RCTs, 313 women; I2 = 7%; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether there was a difference between quinolones and cephalosporins in adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment (RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.52 to 9.72; 6 RCTs, 1085 women; I2 =  0%; very low-quality evidence). Regimens with nitroimidazole versus regimens without nitroimidazole There was probably little or no difference between regimens with or without nitroimidazoles (metronidazole) in rates of cure for mild-moderate PID (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.09; 6 RCTs, 2660 women; I2 = 50%; moderate-quality evidence), or severe PID (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.01; 11 RCTs, 1383 women; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). The evidence suggests that there was little to no difference in in adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.61; 17 studies, 4021 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). . In a sensitivity analysis limited to studies at low risk of bias, there was little or no difference for rates of cure in mild-moderate PID (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12; 3 RCTs, 1434 women; I2 = 0%; high-quality evidence). Regimens containing clindamycin plus aminoglycoside versus quinolone We are uncertain whether quinolone have little to no effect in  rates of cure for mild-moderate PID compared to clindamycin plus aminoglycoside (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.13; 1 RCT, 25 women; very low-quality evidence). The analysis may result in little or no difference between quinolone vs. clindamycin plus aminoglycoside in severe PID (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.19; 2 studies, 151 women; I2 =  0%; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether quinolone reduces adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.72; 3 RCTs, 163 women; I2 =  0%; very low-quality evidence). Regimens containing clindamycin plus aminoglycoside versus regimens containing cephalosporin We are uncertain whether clindamycin plus aminoglycoside improves the rates of cure for mild-moderate PID compared to cephalosporin (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.09; 2 RCTs, 150 women; I2 =  0%; low-quality evidence). There was probably little or no difference in rates of cure in severe PID with clindamycin plus aminoglycoside compared to cephalosporin (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.06; 10 RCTs, 959 women; I2= 21%; moderate-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether clindamycin plus aminoglycoside reduces adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment compared to cephalosporin (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.42; 10 RCTs, 1172 women; I2 =  0%; very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain whether one treatment was safer or more effective than any other for the cure of mild-moderate or severe PID Based on a single study at a low risk of bias, a macrolide (azithromycin) probably improves the rates of cure of mild-moderate PID, compared to tetracycline (doxycycline).

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relative efficacy and safety of treatment regimens for HIV-associated cerebral toxoplasmosis: is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole a real option?

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapies for cerebral toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected adults. The pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine (P-S) combination is considered the mainstay therapy for cerebral toxoplasmosis and pyrimethamine plus clindamycin (P-C) is the most common alternative treatment. Although trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) has potential advantages, its use is infrequent. METHODS: We searched PubMed and four other databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Two independent reviewers searched the databases, identified studies and extracted data. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled across studies using random-effects models. RESULTS: Nine studies were included (five RCTs, three retrospective cohort studies and one prospective cohort study). In comparison to P-S, treatment with P-C or TMP-SMX was associated with similar rates of partial or complete clinical response [P-C: RR 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.08; TMP-SMX: RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78-1.21], radiological response (P-C: RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.82-1.03), skin rash (P-C: RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.56-1.17; TMP-SMX: RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.02-1.29), gastrointestinal impairment (P-C: RR 5.16; 95% CI 0.66-40.11), and drug discontinuation because of adverse events (P-C: RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.07-1.47). Liver impairment was more frequent with P-S than P-C (P-C vs. P-S: RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.24-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence fails to identify a superior regimen in terms of relative efficacy or safety for the treatment of HIV-associated cerebral toxoplasmosis. Use of TMP-SMX as preferred treatment may be consistent with the available evidence and other real-world considerations. Larger comparative studies are needed.

Development of Clostridium septicum gas gangrene as an adverse effect of clindamycin-induced Clostridium difficile infection in a pediatric patient.

Clostridium myonecrosis or gas gangrene is a life-threatening infection characterized by either traumatic or atraumatic etiology. It has been widely described in patients with traumatic open wounds and in immunocompromised patients, including malignancy. A third source can result from natural flora in the gastrointestinal tract after bowel ischemia. This is a rare occurrence and is even less commonly described in the pediatric population. We present a pediatric patient who developed Clostridium septicum myonecrosis as an iatrogenic complication from clindamycin-induced Clostridium difficile ischemic colitis.

Culture-inappropriate antibiotic therapy decreases quality of life improvement after sinus surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite their widespread use, antibiotics have not been shown to improve chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) outcomes. We aimed to determine whether culture-inappropriate postoperative antibiotic therapy was associated with less quality-of-life (QOL) improvement following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study recruited 376 adult CRS patients undergoing FESS between October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011. Patient demographics, comorbidities and medications were collected at baseline. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin were administered for 2 weeks postoperatively. The antibiotic appropriateness was determined based on bacterial resistance profile of organisms identified during intraoperative culture. The QOL outcome was defined as change of 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test scores from preoperative visit to 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month post-FESS. Clinically significant difference was defined as at least 0.5 standard deviations (SD) of baseline QOL score in the reference group. Mixed-effects regression models were performed. RESULTS: Seven percent of patients (n = 27) had culture-inappropriate antibiotic therapy, and additional 5% (n = 19) had culture-specific antibiotic adjustment. Compared to patients with culture-appropriate antibiotics, patients with culture-inappropriate antibiotics had significantly less improvement of QOL from baseline to postoperative 1-month and 3-month follow-up where the difference became clinically significant; patients with antibiotic adjustment had more QOL improvement from baseline to 1-month follow-up, but their QOL worsened at 3-month follow-up, and these changes were not clinically significant. However, all effects washed out at 6-month follow-up with no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Culture-inappropriate postoperative antibiotic therapy decreased short-term QOL improvement to a clinically meaningful level after FESS. Culture guided selection of antibiotics may improve short-term FESS outcome.

Daily dose of clindamycin versus standard divided doses in obstetrical and gynecological infections: a retrospective cohort study.

To compare the rates of cure of septic abortion and pelvic inflammatory disease using a daily dose of clindamycin with gentamicin versus divided doses, we conducted a retrospective cohort study, where the electronic records of 661 patients who used clindamycin 1 × , 3 × or 4 ×/day (groups 1, 3 and 4, respectively) between September 2002 and August 2010 were analysed. Major outcomes included rates of cure and failure according to the clinical records. Secondary endpoints were percentage of adverse effects related to medication regimen and the prevalence of positive VDRL and HIV. Similar conditions were observed in all groups - septic abortion: 167/116/123; pelvic inflammatory disease: 73/95/87 (groups 1, 3 and 4, respectively). No significant difference was found among groups for age or for rate of cure. Rates of cure (cure/total [rate (95%CI)]) in groups 1, 3 and 4 were 236/240 [0.983 (0.957-0.993)], 205/211 [0.971 (0.939-0.986)], 203/210 [0.966 (0.932-0.983)], respectively. Days of use of clindamycin was significantly reduced in group 1, compared to groups 3 and 4 (2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.5 ± 2.5 vs. 3.3 ± 1.9-mean ± SD; p < 0.0001 - ANOVA), but this may be due to differences in how length of therapy was measured and not the effect on clinical cure.

The tolerability profile of clindamycin 1%/benzoyl peroxide 5% gel vs. adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel for facial acne: results of a randomized, single-blind, split-face study.

BACKGROUND: Topical combination therapy, such as that with fixed-dose clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) or adapalene/BPO, is the recommended first-line approach for the treatment of facial acne. AIMS: To compare the tolerability of clindamycin 1%/BPO 5% gel vs. adapalene 0.1% BPO 2.5% gel for the first 2 weeks of treatment in patients with facial acne. PATIENTS/METHODS: Using a randomized, single-blind, split-face method, 48 patients with acne received both clindamycin/BPO and adapalene/BPO once daily for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed tolerability. Treatment efficacy, patient-assessed tolerability and satisfaction, and safety were also investigated. RESULTS: Forty-five patients completed treatment. Investigator-rated scores for erythema, dryness, and peeling were significantly higher with adapalene/BPO than clindamycin/BPO. Patients rated clindamycin/BPO as significantly more tolerable than adapalene/BPO for redness, dryness, burning, itching, and scaling. Investigator Static Global Assessment scores and lesion counts improved with both products, with no significant difference between treatments. Patients' Global Change Assessment showed a statistically significant difference in favor of clindamycin/BPO at week 1, but not week 2. Overall, >80% of patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with treatment at week 2, but 63% of patients stated that they preferred clindamycin/BPO. Both products were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events (AEs), but a post hoc analysis indicated that treatment-related AEs, including irritation, dryness and erythema, were significantly less common with clindamycin/BPO. CONCLUSIONS: Clindamycin/BPO had a better tolerability profile than adapalene/BPO during 2 weeks of split-face treatment. Treatment satisfaction was highest with clindamycin/BPO.

Safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and vehicle-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Topical fixed-combination therapy containing 1% clindamycin as 1.2% clindamycin phosphate (CLNP) and 3% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is an effective treatment for acne vulgaris (acne). OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that the combination of 1.2% CLNP with lower strength BPO (CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%) in a gel formulation is superior to each individual ingredient, CLNP 1.2% and BPO 3%, and vehicle gel. METHODS: A total of 1,319 patients with acne, aged 12 years or older, were enrolled and randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%, CLNP 1.2% gel, BPO 3% gel, or vehicle gel once-daily in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled study. Subjects were evaluated at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 or early termination. Assessment of efficacy was evaluated using a six-point Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) and Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) of acne severity and lesion counts (inflammatory, non-inflammatory, and total). Safety assessments included skin tolerability and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A greater proportion of subjects who used CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3% gel (39%) had a two grade improvement in ISGA from baseline to week 12 compared with CLNP 1.2% (25%; P<0.001), BPO 3% (30%; P=0.016), and vehicle (18%; P<0.001). CLNP 1.2%- BPO 3% was superior to CLNP 1.2% and vehicle alone in the absolute reduction from baseline to week 12 in all three lesion types (P<0.001 all pair-wise comparisons). CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3% was superior to BPO 3% alone in the absolute reduction from baseline to week 12 in inflammatory (P=0.015) and total (P=0.032) lesion counts. The incidence of product-related AEs was low and similar in all study groups (1% with CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%, 2% with CLNP 1.2%, 2% with BPO 3%, and 2% with vehicle). Local tolerability assessments showed similar minimal changes from baseline to week 12 in all study groups. CONCLUSION: CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3% gel provides superior efficacy to improve ISGA score and reduce inflammatory and total lesion counts compared with the individual active ingredients (CLNP 1.2% and BPO 3%) and vehicle, while maintaining a highly favorable safety and tolerability profile similar to BPO 3% alone.

Acné: nuevas tendencias / Acne: new tendencies

La acné es una enfermedad muy frecuente que aparece alrededor de la pubertad y se caracteriza por su polimorfismo lesional y su cronicidad. Se la divide en grados de severidad y según los mismos se determina la terapéutica adecuada. Tiene un alto impacto psicosocial en quienes la padecen por lo cual es muy importante el vínculo que se establece entre el paciente y su médico, lo cual redundará en una buena aceptación del tratamiento y una mejor respuesta por parte del paciente. En los últimos años se ha avanzado en el conocimiento de su etiopatogenia, lo cual permitió un entendimiento más profundo de la enfermedad. La tendencia actual es la de combinar diferentes drogas que tengan influencia sobre diferentes etiopatogénicos de la acné. Se ha comprobado que de este modo la respuesta es más rápida y el tratamiento menos tóxico (AU)

Antibioticoterapia sistêmica na terapia periodontal / The systemic use of antibiotics in periodontal therapy

O tratamento antibiótico na periodontia objetiva erradicar ou controlar patógenos específicos. Os candidatos a esse tipo de terapia säo pacientes com diagnóstico recente de periodontite ativa ou com história de recorrência da doença pós-tratamento mecânico/cirúrgico. O risco de indicaçäo do tratamento quimioterápico, baseado somente em aspecto clínicos, achados radiográficos ou análise microbiológica restrita, é a ocorrência de falhas no controle dos patógenes existentes ou no conhecimento de novos microorganismos. A decisäo de usar a antibioticoterapia, bem como sua indicaçäo, estäo expostas no trabalho que segue

Colitis pseudomembranosa: presentación de cuatro casos / Pseudomembranous colitis: report four cases

Antecedentes: Clostridium difficile es responsable de 25-30 por ciento de la diarreas asociadas a antibióticos. La manifestación más dramática de la infección por este germen es la colitis pseudomembranosa. Métodos: Se reportaron 4 casos de colitis pseudomembranosa y se hace una revisión bibliográfica. Resultados: De los cuatro casos con colitis pseudomembranosa, tres ocurrieron en pacientes mayores de 80 años con enfermedades subyacentes. Todos recibieron cefalosporinas (cefuroxima, ceftriaxona, cefalexina) y uno de ellos, además, clindamicina, previamente al cuadro de colitis. El cuadro clínico se caracterizó por numerosas evacuaciones líquidas con moco (sangre en un paciente), dolor abdominal, náusea, vómito y fiebre. Todos tuvieron leucocitosis con neutrofilia y bandemia. Un paciente cursó con anasarca e hipoalbuminemia, sugestivos de enteropatía perdedora de proteínas. La sigmoidoscopia mostró placas amarillentas, evaludas, cubriendo la mucosa de recto, sigmoides y colon descendente. La respuesta al tratamiento con metronidazol o vancomicina orales fue buena. El metronidazol intravenoso fracasó en un paciente y fue útil en otro. Dos de los cuatro pacientes tuvieron recaídas. La respuesta al tratamiento de las recaídas con metronidazol oral fue buena. Un paciente tuvo dos recaídas respondiendo, finalmente, a metronidazol oral y levaduras de Saccharomyces boulardii. Conclusiones: La colitis pseudomembranosa tiene elevada morbilidad en pacientes debilitados, de edad avanzada. Las recaídas son frecuentes en estos pacientes. Si otros estudios lo corroboran, las levaduras de S. boulardii podrían ser de utilidad en la prevención de esta colitis y en el manejo de sus recaídas

Oral clindamycin and ciprofloxacin versus intramuscular ceftriaxone and oral doxycycline in the treatment of mild-to-moderate pelvic inflammatory disease in outpatients.

This multicenter, prospective, double-blind study compared the safety and efficacy of clindamycin and ciprofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and doxycycline in the treatment of outpatients with mild to moderate pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) diagnosed by laparoscopy. Samples taken from the endocervix, endometrium, and abdominal cavity before treatment and from the endocervix after treatment were cultured for aerobes, anaerobes, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Chlamydia trachomatis. Of the 138 patients enrolled, 131 were evaluable for efficacy. The most prevalent bacteria were streptococci, staphylococci, and Escherichia coli (among aerobes) and Bacteroides species and peptostreptococci (among anaerobes). N. gonorrhoeae was present in 2% (3) of the 131 evaluable patients, and C. trachomatis was in 11% (15). The clinical cure rate was 97% (65 of 67) in the clindamycin and ciprofloxacin group and 95% (61 of 64) in the ceftriaxone and doxycycline group. Side effects were similar in both groups. In conclusion, the two regimens for the outpatient treatment of mild to moderate PID were similarly effective and safe.

Antimicrobial agents for the dermatologist. II. Macrolides, fluoroquinolones, rifamycins, tetracyclines, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and clindamycin

This article is the second of a two-part series reviewing antimicrobial agents that are used by the dermatologist. In part I we reviewed beta-lactam antibiotics and related compounds. In this section we again emphasize some newer agents (macrolides, fluoroquinolones) as well as some of the more commonly employed older agents (rifamycins, tetracyclines, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and clindamycin.

A double-blind, multicenter comparative study of two regimens of clindamycin hydrochloride in the treatment of patients with acute streptococcal tonsillitis/pharyngitis.

In a double-blind, prospective, randomized, multicenter study, 164 patients with a clinical and bacteriologic diagnosis of acute streptococcal tonsillitis/pharyngitis were enrolled to compare the efficacy and safety of two regimens of clindamycin. A rapid identification test of Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) was used to initiate the therapy; however, a positive tonsillar/pharyngeal culture was required at pretreatment to determine if the patient was assessable. Another culture was repeated at least 2 days after the 10 days of drug therapy. From 164 patients enrolled (mean age, 27.7 years; range, 14 to 60 years), 141 were assessable for efficacy; 22 patients were excluded because they did not have a positive culture at pretreatment and 1 patient did not complete the study due to a side effect (rash). All patients were included in the safety analysis. Patients received either clindamycin hydrochloride capsules 150 mg four times per day (QID) or clindamycin hydrochloride capsules 300 mg two times per day (BID) and placebo capsules BID for 10 days. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of demographics, medical history, and evolution of symptoms. The clinical efficacy rate in the two groups at day 12 was as follows: QID group--cured, 64 (92.8%) of 69 patients; improved, 5 (7.2%) of 69 patients; BID group--cured, 67 (93.1%) of 72 patients; improved, 5 (6.9%) of 72 patients. There were no significant differences between the groups. Both regimens were well tolerated with only 1 patient in the QID group who did not complete the therapy due to a rash.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Estudo comparativo entre as associaçöes aztreonam/clindamicina e tobramicina/clindamicina no tratamento de infecçöes intra-abdominais / Comparison of aztreonam plus clindamycin with tobramycin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections

Este estudo avaliou a atividade do aztreonam (um antibiótico ß-lactâmico com atividade específica contra bactérias Gram-negativas), comparando-a com a da tobramicina, em pacientes hospitalizados com infecçöes intra-abdominais severas causadas por patógenos Gram-negativos isoladamente ou associados a outras bactérias. O estudo incluiu no total 156 pacientes, dos quais 76 receberam aztreonam + clindamicina e 80 foram tratados com tobramicina + clindamicina. Os pacientes foram submetidos a diversos procedimentos cirúrgicos envolvendo a cavidade peritoneal. A avaliaçäo clínica final revelou percentagens semelhantes de resultados satisfatórios: 86,5% nos pacientes tratados com aztreonam e 86.2% no grupo tratado com tobramicina. Entre os pacientes que tiveram maus resultados observou-se que em 50% dos casos as infecçöes eram causadas por Gram-negativos isoladamente ou associados a miciroorganismos Gram-positivos, no grupo tratado com aztreonam; esta percentagem subiu para 82% quando se avaliou o mesmo subgrupo entre os pacientes tratados com tobramicina. A incidência de efeitos adversos e de alteraçöes dos parâmetros laboratoriais näo foi significante e semelhante nos dois grupos. Os resultados deste estudo sugerem que o aztreonam pode ser uma droga eficaz e segura para o tratamento de infecçöes causadas por bactérias Gram-negativas

Tetracyclines, macrolides, lincosamides & chloramphenicol.

Macrolides, lincosamides, tetracyclines and chloramphenicol are structurally unrelated antibiotics which share protein synthesis inhibition as their common mechanism of action. Despite their individual differences, they can all be considered broad spectrum antibiotics with practical use for a wide variety of infections. Due to their similarities in function, however, concurrent or sequential administration of these agents must be undertaken with caution in order to prevent antagonism and induction of bacterial resistance. Full understanding of their function and potential interactions are, therefore, important. Indications, interactions, mechanisms of function, side effects and contraindications are fully discussed.