Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 10.455
Filter
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(6): 3589-3599, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829154

ABSTRACT

Frequency importance functions (FIFs) for simulated bimodal hearing were derived using sentence perception scores measured in quiet and noise. Acoustic hearing was simulated using low-pass filtering. Electric hearing was simulated using a six-channel vocoder with three input frequency ranges, resulting in overlap, meet, and gap maps, relative to the acoustic cutoff frequency. Spectral holes present in the speech spectra were created within electric stimulation by setting amplitude(s) of channels to zero. FIFs were significantly different between frequency maps. In quiet, the three FIFs were similar with gradually increasing weights with channels 5 and 6 compared to the first three channels. However, the most and least weighted channels slightly varied depending on the maps. In noise, the patterns of the three FIFs were similar to those in quiet, with steeper increasing weights with channels 5 and 6 compared to the first four channels. Thus, channels 5 and 6 contributed to speech perception the most, while channels 1 and 2 contributed the least, regardless of frequency maps. Results suggest that the contribution of cochlear implant frequency bands for bimodal speech perception depends on the degree of frequency overlap between acoustic and electric stimulation and if noise is absent or present.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Noise , Speech Perception , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Perceptual Masking , Adult
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12787, 2024 06 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834775

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implant users experience difficulties controlling their vocalizations compared to normal hearing peers. However, less is known about their voice quality. The primary aim of the present study was to determine if cochlear implant users' voice quality would be categorized as dysphonic by the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS). A secondary aim was to determine if vocal quality is further impacted when using bilateral implants compared to using only one implant. The final aim was to determine how residual hearing impacts voice quality. Twenty-seven cochlear implant users participated in the present study and were recorded while sustaining a vowel and while reading a standardized passage. These recordings were analyzed to calculate the AVQI and CPPS. The results indicate that CI users' voice quality was detrimentally affected by using their CI, raising to the level of a dysphonic voice. Specifically, when using their CI, mean AVQI scores were 4.0 and mean CPPS values were 11.4 dB, which indicates dysphonia. There were no significant differences in voice quality when comparing participants with bilateral implants to those with one implant. Finally, for participants with residual hearing, as hearing thresholds worsened, the likelihood of a dysphonic voice decreased.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Voice Quality , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Dysphonia/physiopathology , Speech Acoustics , Cochlear Implantation
4.
JASA Express Lett ; 4(5)2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717468

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated whether adaptive training with time-compressed speech produces an age-dependent improvement in speech recognition in 14 adult cochlear-implant users. The protocol consisted of a pretest, 5 h of training, and a posttest using time-compressed speech and an adaptive procedure. There were significant improvements in time-compressed speech recognition at the posttest session following training (>5% in the average time-compressed speech recognition threshold) but no effects of age. These results are promising for the use of adaptive training in aural rehabilitation strategies for cochlear-implant users across the adult lifespan and possibly using speech signals, such as time-compressed speech, to train temporal processing.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Humans , Speech Perception/physiology , Aged , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Time Factors
5.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(5): 3101-3117, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722101

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implant (CI) users often report being unsatisfied by music listening through their hearing device. Vibrotactile stimulation could help alleviate those challenges. Previous research has shown that musical stimuli was given higher preference ratings by normal-hearing listeners when concurrent vibrotactile stimulation was congruent in intensity and timing with the corresponding auditory signal compared to incongruent. However, it is not known whether this is also the case for CI users. Therefore, in this experiment, we presented 18 CI users and 24 normal-hearing listeners with five melodies and five different audio-to-tactile maps. Each map varied the congruence between the audio and tactile signals related to intensity, fundamental frequency, and timing. Participants were asked to rate the maps from zero to 100, based on preference. It was shown that almost all normal-hearing listeners, as well as a subset of the CI users, preferred tactile stimulation, which was congruent with the audio in intensity and timing. However, many CI users had no difference in preference between timing aligned and timing unaligned stimuli. The results provide evidence that vibrotactile music enjoyment enhancement could be a solution for some CI users; however, more research is needed to understand which CI users can benefit from it most.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implants , Music , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Auditory Perception/physiology , Young Adult , Patient Preference , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Touch Perception/physiology , Vibration , Touch
7.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): e381-e384, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728553

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient preference after stapedotomy versus cochlear implantation in a unique case of a patient with symmetrical profound mixed hearing loss and similar postoperative speech perception improvement. PATIENTS: An adult patient with bilateral symmetrical far advanced otosclerosis, with profound mixed hearing loss. INTERVENTION: Stapedotomy in the left ear, cochlear implantation in the right ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Performance on behavioral audiometry, and subjective report of hearing and intervention preference. RESULTS: A patient successfully underwent left stapedotomy and subsequent cochlear implantation on the right side, per patient preference. Preoperative audiometric characteristics were similar between ears (pure-tone average [PTA] [R: 114; L: 113 dB]; word recognition score [WRS]: 22%). Postprocedural audiometry demonstrated significant improvement after stapedotomy (PTA: 59 dB, WRS: 75%) and from cochlear implant (PTA: 20 dB, WRS: 60%). The patient subjectively reported a preference for the cochlear implant ear despite having substantial gains from stapedotomy. A nuanced discussion highlighting potentially overlooked benefits of cochlear implants in far advanced otosclerosis is conducted. CONCLUSION: In comparison with stapedotomy and hearing aids, cochlear implantation generally permits greater access to sound among patients with far advanced otosclerosis. Though the cochlear implant literature mainly focuses on speech perception outcomes, an underappreciated benefit of cochlear implantation is the high likelihood of achieving "normal" sound levels across the audiogram.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Otosclerosis , Speech Perception , Stapes Surgery , Humans , Otosclerosis/surgery , Stapes Surgery/methods , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Male , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural/surgery , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Patient Preference , Female , Adult
8.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): 521-528, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728554

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate a system for otomicrosurgery based on 4K three-dimensional (3D) exoscope technology and apply it to cochlear implantation. METHODS: An open stereoscopic vision-based surgical system, which differs from traditional surgical microscopes, was created by utilizing 4K stereo imaging technology and combining it with low-latency 4K ultra-high-definition 3D display. The system underwent evaluation based on 57 cochlear implantation operations, three designed microscopic manipulations, and a questionnaire survey. RESULTS: The surgical images displayed by the 4K-3D exoscope system (4K-3D-ES) are stereoscopic, clear, and smooth. The use of 4K-3D-ES in cochlear implantation is not inferior to traditional microscopes in terms of intraoperative bleeding and surgical complications, and the surgical duration is not slower or may even be faster than when using traditional microscopes. The results of micromanipulation experiments conducted on 16 students also confirmed this and demonstrated that 4K-3D-ES can be easily adapted. Furthermore, additional advantages of 4K-3D-ES were gathered. Significantly enlarged and high-definition stereoscopic images contribute to the visualization of finer anatomical microstructures such as chordae tympani, ensuring safer surgery. Users feel more comfortable in their necks, shoulders, waists, and backs. Real-time shared stereoscopic view for multiple people, convenient for collaboration and teaching. The ear endoscope and 4K-3D-ES enable seamless switching on the same screen. High-definition 3D images and videos can be saved with just one click, making future publication and communication convenient. CONCLUSION: The feasibility and safety of 4K-3D-ES for cochlear implantation surgery have been demonstrated. The 4K-3D-ES also offers numerous unique advantages and holds clinical application and promotional value.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Male , Female , Child , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Microsurgery/methods , Microsurgery/instrumentation , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Infant
9.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): e406-e410, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728556

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rare process of osteolytic labyrinthitis, previously referred to as labyrinthine sequestrum, which involves progressive obliteration of the bony and membranous labyrinth with eventual supplantation with soft tissue and, in some cases, bony sequestrum. PATIENTS: Three patients with diverse presentations of osteolytic labyrinthitis from two tertiary care academic medical centers. INTERVENTIONS: Case series report analyzing the relevant clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and surgical data on our patients with osteolytic labyrinthitis and comparing these index cases to the existing literature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We describe the varying image findings seen in osteolytic labyrinthitis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Also, we report successful surgical intervention and hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implantation in patients with osteolytic labyrinthitis. RESULTS: Our three patients presented with profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss and vertigo consistent with labyrinthitis. None of the three patients had a history of chronic otitis media. Imaging workup revealed varying degrees of erosion to the otic capsule bone demonstrating the spectrum of disease seen in osteolytic labyrinthitis. Although two cases showed osteolytic changes to the semicircular canals and vestibule, the first case revealed frank bony sequestrum within the obliterated labyrinth. The three cases were taken for surgical debridement and cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: We propose the new term, osteolytic labyrinthitis-previously referred to as labyrinthine sequestrum-to describe the rare spectrum of disease characterized by destruction of the osseous and membranous labyrinth and potential supplantation with bony sequestrum. Cochlear implantation is a viable option in selected patients with osteolytic labyrinthitis.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Labyrinthitis , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Labyrinthitis/surgery , Labyrinthitis/complications , Labyrinthitis/diagnostic imaging , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnostic imaging , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Osteolysis/diagnostic imaging , Osteolysis/surgery , Osteolysis/complications , Aged , Vertigo/surgery , Vertigo/etiology , Vertigo/diagnostic imaging
10.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): 536-541, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728555

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of cochlear implantation (CI) in case of far advanced otosclerosis and to evaluate the value of using intraoperative otoendoscopy to facilitate the identification of the round window membrane and the scala tympani without the need to remove the posterior canal wall or to perform a subtotal petrosectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-series study. SETTING: Tertiary academic CI center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on patients with far advanced otosclerosis who underwent endoscopic-assisted CI between January 2010 and June 2020 at the same CI center. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in the study. Ten patients had undergone a previous stapedotomy. Electrode insertion in the scala tympani was successfully accomplished in all cases included in the study. There was a statistically significant improvement in pure-tone average and speech discrimination scores in all cases of the study group (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative pure-tone average or speech discrimination scores between cases with and without cochlear ossification or between cases with and without a previous stapedotomy (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic-assisted CI is an effective option for hearing restoration in patients with far advanced otosclerosis. Otoendoscopy can facilitate visualization and access to the scala tympani without the need to remove the posterior canal wall or to perform a subtotal petrosectomy.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Endoscopy , Otosclerosis , Humans , Otosclerosis/surgery , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Adult , Aged , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Clin Ethics ; 35(2): 101-106, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728696

ABSTRACT

AbstractCochlear implants can restore hearing in people with severe hearing loss and have a significant impact on communication, social integration, self-esteem, and quality of life. However, whether and how much clinical benefit is derived from cochlear implants varies significantly by patient and is influenced by the etiology and extent of hearing loss, medical comorbidities, and preexisting behavioral and psychosocial issues. In patients with underlying psychosis, concerns have been raised that the introduction of auditory stimuli could trigger hallucinations, worsen existing delusions, or exacerbate erratic behavior. This concern has made psychosis a relative contraindication to cochlear implant surgery. This is problematic because there is a lack of data describing this phenomenon and because the psychosocial benefits derived from improvement in auditory function may be a critical intervention for treating psychosis in some patients. The objective of this report is to provide an ethical framework for guiding clinical decision-making on cochlear implant surgery in the hearing impaired with psychosis.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/complications , Hearing Loss/surgery , Cochlear Implants , Quality of Life , Comorbidity , Decision Making/ethics , Clinical Decision-Making/ethics , Ethics, Medical
12.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 180: 111968, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714045

ABSTRACT

AIM & OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude with receptive and expressive language ages in children using cochlear implant (CI) in one ear and a hearing aid (HA) in non-implanted ear. METHODS: The study included 30 children, consisting of 18 males and 12 females, aged between 48 and 96 months. The age at which the children received CI ranged from 42 to 69 months. A within-subject research design was utilized and participants were selected through purposive sampling. Auditory late latency responses (ALLR) were assessed using the Intelligent hearing system to measure P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude. The assessment checklist for speech-language skills (ACSLS) was employed to evaluate receptive and expressive language age. Both assessments were conducted after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: A total of 30 children participated in the study, with a mean implant age of 20.03 months (SD: 8.14 months). The mean P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude was 129.50 ms (SD: 15.05 ms) and 6.93 µV (SD: 2.24 µV) respectively. Correlation analysis revealed no significant association between ALLR measures and receptive or expressive language ages. However, there was significant negative correlation between the P1 latency and implant age (Spearman's rho = -0.371, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that P1 latency which is an indicative of auditory maturation, may not be a reliable marker for predicting language outcomes. It can be concluded that language development is likely to be influenced by other factors beyond auditory maturation alone.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Language Development , Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Reaction Time/physiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Age Factors , Speech Perception/physiology
13.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): 529-535, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693093

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We assessed three cochlear implant (CI) suppliers: Advanced Bionics, Cochlear Limited, and MED-EL, for implant revision requiring reoperation after CI placement. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of integrated-health-system database between 2010 and 2021. Separate models were created for pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) cohorts. PATIENTS: Pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) patients undergoing cochlear implantation within our integrated healthcare system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Revision after CI placement. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate revision risk and adjust for confounding factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented. RESULTS: A total of 2,347 patients underwent a primary CI placement, and Cochlear Limited was most implanted (51.5%), followed by Advanced Bionics (35.2%) and MED-EL (13.3%). In the pediatric cohort, the 7-year crude revision rate was 10.9% for Advanced Bionics and 4.8% for Cochlear Limited, whereas MED-EL had insufficient cases. In adults, the rates were 9.1%, 4.5%, and 3.3% for Advanced Bionics, MED-EL, and Cochlear Limited, respectively. After 2 years of postoperative follow-up, Advanced Bionics had a significantly higher revision risk (HR = 8.25, 95% CI = 2.91-23.46); MED-EL had no difference (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 0.46-9.25). CONCLUSION: We found an increased revision risk after 2 years of follow-up for adults with Advanced Bionics CI devices. Although we found no statistical difference between manufacturers in the pediatric cohort, after 2 years of follow-up, there were increasing trends in the revision probability for Advanced Bionics. Further research may determine whether patients are better suited for some CI devices.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Reoperation , Humans , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Child , Adult , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implantation/trends , Adolescent , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Child, Preschool , Young Adult , Aged , Infant , Cohort Studies
15.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811173

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the auditory and speech abilities of children with congenital auditory neuropathy (AN) after cochlear implant (CI), and to analyze the role of genetic testing in predicting the postoperative outcomes of CI in AN patients. Methods: Fourteen children diagnosed with AN by audiological battery test and underwent CI surgery in Xijing Hospital of the Air Force Medical University from 2002 to 2021 were included in this study (9 males and 5 females), with an implantation age of (3.1±1.7) years (mean±standard deviation, the same as follows). The preoperative audiological results and deafness gene results were analyzed. Another 52 children with ordinary sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) were selected as the control group (30 males and 22 females), with an implantation age of (2.2±0.9) years. The demographic factors such as age and gender were matched with those of the AN group. The modified Category Auditory Performance (CAP-Ⅱ) and Speech Intelligence Rate (SIR) were used to evaluate the development of postoperative auditory and speech abilities in two groups. The Mandarin Speech Test System was used to test the speech recognition rate of monosyllabic and disyllabic words and sentences. Matlab 2022 software was used to analyze the data. Results: The results of gene in 14 children with AN showed that 6 cases had OTOF gene mutations, 2 cases (siblings) were confirmed to have TNN gene mutations through whole exome sequencing, and the remaining 6 cases were not find any clear pathogenic gene mutations. All subjects underwent CI surgery with electrodes implanted into the cochlea smoothly, and there were no postoperative complications. After surgery, all AN children had improved auditory and speech abilities, but only 64% (9/14) of AN children with CI had auditory ability scores comparable to the control group of SNHL children (including 2 children with TNN gene mutations), and 36% (5/14) of AN children had lower scores than the control group of SNHL children.The average speech recognition rate of two children with TNN gene mutations was 86.5%, and of two children with OTOF gene mutations was 83.2%. Conclusions: AN children achieved varying degrees of auditory and speech abilities after CI, but the postoperative effects varied greatly. Some children achieved similar results as ordinary SNHL children, but there were still some children whose effects were worse than those of ordinary SNHL children. The postoperative efficacy of CI in two children with AN caused by TNN pathogenic genes were comparable to that of ordinary SNHL in children. Genetic testing had certain reference value for predicting the postoperative effect of CI in AN children.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Central , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Hearing Loss, Central/genetics , Hearing Loss, Central/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Child , Speech Perception
16.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0304316, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809896

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Current evidence supports the benefits of cochlear implants (CIs) in children with hearing loss, including those with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). However, there is limited evidence regarding factors that hold predictive value for intervention outcomes. DESIGN: This retrospective case-control study consisted of 66 children with CIs, including 22 with ANSD and 44 with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) matched on sex, age, age at CI activation, and the length of follow-up with CIs (1:2 ratio). The case and control groups were compared in the results of five open-set speech perception tests, and a Forward Linear Regression Model was used to identify factors that can predict the post-CI outcomes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in average scores between the two groups across five outcome measures, ranging from 88.40% to 95.65%. The correlation matrix revealed that younger ages at hearing aid fitting and CI activation positively influenced improvements in speech perception test scores. Furthermore, among the variables incorporated in the regression model, the duration of follow-up with CIs, age at CI activation, and the utilization of two CIs demonstrated prognostic significance for improved post-CI speech perception outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Children with ANSD can achieve similar open-set speech perception outcomes as children with SNHL. A longer CI follow-up, a lower age at CI activation, and the use of two CIs are predictive for optimal CI outcome.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Central , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Child , Retrospective Studies , Hearing Loss, Central/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Central/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Cochlear Implantation , Infant , Prognosis
18.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 67(6): 1850-1867, 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713817

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Verbal working memory is poorer for children with hearing loss than for peers with normal hearing (NH), even with cochlear implantation and early intervention. Poor verbal working memory can affect academic performance, especially in higher grades, making this deficit a significant problem. This study examined the stability of verbal working memory across middle childhood, tested working memory in adolescents with NH or cochlear implants (CIs), explored whether signal enhancement can improve verbal working memory, and tested two hypotheses proposed to explain the poor verbal working memory of children with hearing loss: (a) Diminished auditory experience directly affects executive functions, including working memory; (b) degraded auditory inputs inhibit children's abilities to recover the phonological structure needed for encoding verbal material into storage. DESIGN: Fourteen-year-olds served as subjects: 55 with NH; 52 with CIs. Immediate serial recall tasks were used to assess working memory. Stimuli consisted of nonverbal, spatial stimuli and four kinds of verbal, acoustic stimuli: nonrhyming and rhyming words, and nonrhyming words with two kinds of signal enhancement: audiovisual and indexical. Analyses examined (a) stability of verbal working memory across middle childhood, (b) differences in verbal and nonverbal working memory, (c) effects of signal enhancement on recall, (d) phonological processing abilities, and (e) source of the diminished verbal working memory in adolescents with cochlear implants. RESULTS: Verbal working memory remained stable across middle childhood. Adolescents across groups performed similarly for nonverbal stimuli, but those with CIs displayed poorer recall accuracy for verbal stimuli; signal enhancement did not improve recall. Poor phonological sensitivity largely accounted for the group effect. CONCLUSIONS: The central executive for working memory is not affected by hearing loss or cochlear implantation. Instead, the phonological deficit faced by adolescents with CIs denigrates the representation in storage and augmenting the signal does not help.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Memory, Short-Term , Humans , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Adolescent , Female , Male , Hearing Loss/psychology , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Verbal Learning/physiology , Child , Speech Perception/physiology
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2412846, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780940

ABSTRACT

Importance: Children with profound hearing loss (HL) and vestibular impairment have worse cochlear implant outcomes compared with those without vestibular impairment. However, the decision for cochlear implantation is rarely based on vestibular function assessment as a complement to audiologic testing. Objectives: To identify the prevalence of vestibular impairment according to HL origin and to assess the association between vestibular impairment and delayed posturomotor development in children with profound HL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted in a pediatric referral center for cochlear implantation in Paris, France, using medical records data on HL origin, vestibular assessment, and ages of developmental milestone achievement. The cohort included children with profound HL (loss >90 dB HL) who completed vestibular assessment prior to cochlear implantation between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019. Data analyses were conducted between January and June 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was prevalence of vestibular impairment according to HL origin. Children were classified into 3 groups according to their responses to vestibular testing: normal vestibular function (NVF), partially impaired vestibular function (PVF), and complete bilateral vestibular loss (CBVL). Generalized logit models were performed to evaluate the association between vestibular impairment and causes of HL as well as posturomotor development delay. Results: A total of 592 children were included (308 males [52.0%]; mean [SD] age, 38 [34] months). In children with documented HL origin (n = 266), 45.1% (120) had HL with genetic origin, 50.0% of which were syndromic (mainly Usher and Waardenburg syndromes) and 50.0% were nonsyndromic (mainly associated with connexin 26). Among patients with infectious HL origin (n = 74), 70.3% (52) had cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Vestibular impairment was found in 44.4% (263 of 592) of the children; it was mostly symmetrical in 88.9% (526) and was CBVL in 5.7% (34) of the cases. Vestibular impairment was present in 78.3% (47) of children with genetic syndromic HL (56.7% [34] with PVF; 21.7% [13] with CBVL) and in 69.2% (36) of children with CMV infection (57.7% [30] with PVF; 11.5% [6] with CBVL). Genetic syndromic HL origin was found to be more often associated with both PVF and CBVL than other HL causes. The odds of having delays in 4 developmental milestones (head holding, sitting, standing with support, and independent walking) were higher in both PVF and CBVL (eg, head-holding odds ratios: 2.55 and 4.79) compared with NVF, and the age of achieving these milestones was higher in CBVL than PVF (eg, head holding: 7.33 vs 4.03 years; P < .001). All 4 developmental milestones were associated with the degree of vestibular impairment. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that among children with profound HL, vestibular impairment was prevalent, varied according to HL origin, and associated with posturomotor development; while all developmental milestones were associated with vestibular impairment severity, not all HL causes were associated with vestibular impairment severity. Children with profound HL may benefit from complete vestibular assessment before cochlear implantation, which would support early and adapted management, such as physical therapy for CBVL and cochlear implantation strategy.


Subject(s)
Vestibular Diseases , Humans , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Vestibular Diseases/epidemiology , Vestibular Diseases/complications , Child , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/epidemiology , Cochlear Implantation , Cohort Studies , Postural Balance/physiology , Vestibular Function Tests , Prevalence , Paris/epidemiology , Infant
20.
Hear Res ; 447: 109024, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735179

ABSTRACT

Delayed loss of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation is a common but poorly understood phenomenon due to the scarcity of relevant temporal bone tissues. Prior histopathological analysis of one case of post-implantation hearing loss suggested there were no interaural differences in hair cell or neural degeneration to explain the profound loss of low-frequency hearing on the implanted side (Quesnel et al., 2016) and attributed the threshold elevation to neo-ossification and fibrosis around the implant. Here we re-evaluated the histopathology in this case, applying immunostaining and improved microscopic techniques for differentiating surviving hair cells from supporting cells. The new analysis revealed dramatic interaural differences, with a > 80 % loss of inner hair cells in the cochlear apex on the implanted side, which can account for the post-implantation loss of residual hearing. Apical degeneration of the stria further contributed to threshold elevation on the implanted side. In contrast, spiral ganglion cell survival was reduced in the region of the electrode on the implanted side, but apical counts in the two ears were similar to that seen in age-matched unimplanted control ears. Almost none of the surviving auditory neurons retained peripheral axons throughout the basal half of the cochlea. Relevance to cochlear implant performance is discussed.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Spiral Ganglion , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Spiral Ganglion/pathology , Spiral Ganglion/physiopathology , Hair Cells, Auditory, Inner/pathology , Time Factors , Cell Survival , Male , Hearing , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/pathology , Hearing Loss/surgery , Hearing Loss/etiology , Female , Hair Cells, Auditory/pathology , Aged , Nerve Degeneration , Middle Aged , Temporal Bone/pathology , Temporal Bone/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...