Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
J Laryngol Otol ; 135(10): 918-925, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34404494

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and postponement of elective surgical procedures for profoundly deaf patients awaiting cochlear implantation. METHOD: Open-ended questionnaires were sent to all adult patients awaiting cochlear implantation surgery. Qualitative analysis was performed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Participants described a primarily negative impact on wellbeing from the surgery delay, expressing feelings of isolation or loneliness. Low mood, depression or hopelessness were commonly expressed by elderly participants; frustration and anxiety were described by young adults. Participants described a negative impact on their general daily life, describing difficulties communicating with facemasks and struggles with reliance on telephone communication because of social distancing. Despite these significant psychosocial challenges, only a minority described adaptive coping strategies. DISCUSSION: Profoundly deaf patients may be at greater psychosocial risk because of unique challenges from their hearing disability. Our findings can be used to develop evidence-driven strategies to improve communication, wellbeing and quality of life.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/surgery , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Communication , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Female , Frustration , Humans , Loneliness/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Distancing , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life/psychology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 144(5): EL429, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30522282

ABSTRACT

Clinical tests of cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in sentence recognition cannot fully reflect CI users' self-reported quality of life (QoL). Here, vocal emotion recognition scores, speech reception thresholds (SRTs), and demographic factors were tested as predictors of QoL scores assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire in postlingually deafened adult CI users. After correction for multiple comparisons, vocal emotion recognition scores were significantly correlated with QoL scores in all subdomains (social interaction, self-esteem, etc.), while SRTs and duration of CI use were not. Vocal emotion recognition may thus be used in clinic to accurately and broadly predict QoL with CIs.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Deafness/psychology , Emotions/physiology , Voice/physiology , Aged , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Deafness/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Quality of Life , Speech Discrimination Tests/methods , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech Reception Threshold Test/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 144(5): EL423, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30522318

ABSTRACT

Both music and speech perception rely on hearing out one pitch in the presence of others. Pitch discrimination of narrowband sounds based only on temporal-envelope cues is rendered nearly impossible by introducing interferers in both normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant (CI) users. This study tested whether performance improves in normal-hearing listeners if the target is presented over a broad spectral region. The results indicate that performance is still strongly affected by spectrally remote interferers, despite increases in bandwidth, suggesting that envelope-based pitch is unlikely to allow CI users to perceive pitch when multiple harmonic sounds are presented at once.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Pitch Discrimination/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Cues , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Minnesota/epidemiology , Music , Pitch Perception/physiology , Time Factors , Young Adult
4.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 25(5): 365-369, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28719395

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Minorities often lag behind in hearing loss evaluation and treatment. Our cochlear implant program aimed to identify the socioeconomic and cultural barriers that prevented our African-American cochlear implant candidates from seeking help for their hearing loss, specifically cochlear implant surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Our pilot study surveyed 11 African-Americans with cochlear implants and identified obstacles that included patient-physician mistrust, social stigma, financial cost, and lack of education about the devices and procedures. Our experienced cochlear implant team then addressed these issues in its weekly meetings to review cases and potential cochlear implant candidates, and we partnered with community organizations to improve awareness about cochlear implants among healthcare professionals and the public. SUMMARY: During our cochlear implant team's community outreach to African-Americans with hearing loss, we initiated several actions to address the various disparities in access to care and use of services: development of patient education, patient-run support group, tracking of clinical outcomes, and opportunities for involvement in health policy making for cochlear implants. Cochlear implant teams should deepen their involvement with African-Americans and other minorities with hearing loss to better support and ultimately improve cochlear implant access, performance, and function.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Community-Institutional Relations , Hearing Loss/ethnology , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Program Evaluation , Cochlear Implantation , Humans , Minority Groups , Pilot Projects , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
5.
Buenos Aires; IECS; jul. 2017.
Non-conventional in Spanish | BRISA/RedTESA | ID: biblio-1177812

ABSTRACT

CONTEXTO CLÍNICO: El término sordera hace referencia a la pérdida completa de la capacidad auditiva en uno o ambos oídos, mientras que en los defectos de audición la pérdida de la facultad de oír puede ser parcial o total. Dependiendo de la parte del oído que esté afectada, los defectos de audición pueden ser de dos tipos: de conducción o neurosensoriales. El primero presenta un problema en el oído externo o medio y generalmente se puede tratar con fármacos o cirugía. Un ejemplo frecuente es la infección crónica del oído medio. En el segundo, el problema afecta al oído interno o, a veces, al nervio auditivo. Com frecuencia es permanente y requiere algún tipo de rehabilitación como el uso de un audífono. Los defectos de audición de tipo neurosensorial suelen deberse a trauma acústico, envejecimiento o enfermedades infecciosas como la meningitis, el sarampión, la rubéola o la parotiditis. Los defectos de la audición también se clasifican en función de su momento de aparición en relación al desarrollo del habla, siendo prelinguales si son anteriores o postlinguales si son posteriores. TECNOLOGÍA: El IC es un dispositivo electrónico compuesto por una estructura interna, que permite la estimulación de las fibras nerviosas auditivas tras su implantación quirúrgica, y otra parte externa que recoge, analiza y codifica los sonidos. La parte externa consta de un micrófono, que recoge los sonidos y los envía al procesador, que selecciona y codifica los sonidos más útiles para la comprensión del lenguaje. El transmisor envía los sonidos, ya codificados, al receptor. La estructura interna está formada por el receptor-estimulador, que se implanta en la apófisis mastoides del hueso temporal, detrás del pabellón auricular, y envía las señales eléctricas a los electrodos. Los electrodos se introducen en el interior de la cóclea (oído interno) y estimulan las células nerviosas que aún funcionan. Estos estímulos pasan a través del nervio auditivo al cerebro, que los reconoce como sonidos, teniendo así la sensación de oír. Ambas partes, externa e interna, se ponen en contacto por un cable y un imán. Existen modelos diferentes según la ubicación de los electrodos, la forma de tratar el sonido y el número de canales utilizado, siendo los de multicanales los modelos comercializados actualmente. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar la evidencia disponible acerca de la eficacia, seguridad y aspectos relacionados a las políticas de cobertura del uso de implantes cocleares bilaterales para hipoacusia. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas, en buscadores genéricos de internet, y financiadores de salud. Se priorizó la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas (RS), ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados (ECAs), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS), evaluaciones económicas, guías de práctica clínica (GPC) y políticas de cobertura de diferentes sistemas de salud. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron dos RS, dos GPC, dos evaluaciones de tecnología sanitaria, y 14 informes de políticas de cobertura implantes cocleares bilaterales en hipoacusia. CONCLUSIONES: Evidencia de moderada calidad indica que, en comparación con los implantes unilaterales, los implantes cocleares bilaterales podrían ofrecer, en ciertos pacientes, algunos beneficios adicionales sobre todo en términos de ubicación espacial y discriminación del lenguaje en condiciones de ruido. Tanto las guías de práctica clínica como los financiadores consultados contemplan el uso de implantes cocleares bilaterales. Sin embargo, en algunos casos, debido a la incertidumbre sobre el tamaño del beneficio que podrían ofrecer y el costo adicional que representan respecto al implante unilateral, limitan sus indicaciones a poblaciones específicas (adultos ciegos, niños) y solo para la colocación simultánea de ambos implantes, desaconsejando la colocación secuencial de un segundo implante en forma rutinaria.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Hearing Loss/therapy , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Cost-Benefit Analysis
6.
Audiol., Commun. res ; 19(1): 45-51, 03/2014. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-705726

ABSTRACT

Objetivo : Identificar o perfil populacional de idosos encaminhados à seleção de próteses auditivas em um hospital público, no que diz respeito às características sociodemográficas, de saúde geral e auditiva. Métodos : Estudo com 191 idosos e coleta de dados realizada por meio de prontuários. Análise realizada por meio de estatística descritiva, distribuição de frequências e análise de variância. Resultados : Predominância de participantes do gênero feminino, nascidos no Estado de São Paulo, raça branca, residentes em domicílio próprio, escolaridade entre zero e quatro anos, não ocupados, renda salarial entre zero e três salários mínimos, situação econômica regular e ausência de plano privado de saúde. A maior parte dos encaminhamentos partiu do próprio Hospital São Paulo. Em média, os pacientes gastam mais de 60 minutos para realizar o trajeto desde sua residência até o ambulatório. Foi observada relação entre percepção de saúde regular ou ruim e presença de doenças crônicas, tontura, zumbido, progressão da perda auditiva, ocorrência de dificuldades visuais e de locomoção e tempo de privação auditiva. Tipo, grau e configuração audiométrica com predominância neurossensorial, moderado e descendente respectivamente. Quanto à seleção de próteses auditivas, houve predomínio de aparelhos retroauriculares e moldes auriculares dos tipos invisível duplo e canal. Conclusão : O perfil dos idosos foi obtido e nos levou a reflexões importantes sobre acessibilidade aos serviços de saúde e da educação em saúde. .


Purpose : To identify the profile of the elderly population referred for hearing aids fitting in a public hospital, regarding sociodemographic characteristics, general and hearing health. Methods : The data of 191 elderly were collected from medical records. The analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, frequency distribution and analysis of variance. Results : There was a predominance of female participants, who were born in São Paulo, Caucasians, with proper residence, years of education between zero and four years, no occupation labor, income between zero and three salaries, regular economic situation and lack of private healthcare insurance. Most referrals came from São Paulo Hospital. Patients spend more than 60 minutes on average to make the journey from his residence to the clinic. Relationship between perception of regular or poor health and chronic diseases, dizziness, tinnitus, hearing loss progression, occurrence of visual difficulties, transportation and time of auditory deprivation observed in this study. Type, level and audiometric configuration with sensorineural, moderate and downward sloping predominance. Regarding the selection of hearing aids, predominated BTEs hearing aids, skeleton and canal ear molds. Conclusion : The profile of the elderly obtained in this study leads to important insights about accessibility to health services and health education. .


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Health Profile , Hospitals, Public , Population Dynamics , Statistical Data , Health Education , Health Services , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Medical Records , Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
7.
s.l; CONITEC; [2014]. tab.
Non-conventional in Portuguese | LILACS, BRISA/RedTESA | ID: biblio-836730

ABSTRACT

A deficiência auditiva ocupa um lugar de destaque na atenção à pessoa com deficiência, pois acarreta inúmeras limitações para o desenvolvimento do indivíduo. Uma vez que diminui a capacidade de percepção dos sons, limita ou impede que o seu portador desempenhe plenamente o seu papel na sociedade. O implante coclear - IC tem como objetivo substituir parcialmente as funções da cóclea, transformando os sinais sonoros em sinais elétricos. Vem sendo indicado como uma opção de tratamento para pacientes, adultos e crianças, portadores de deficiência sensório-neural profunda bilateral que obtêm pouco ou nenhum benefício com A.A.S.I. (Aparelho de Amplificação Sonora Individual). É considerado como um recurso efetivo, permitindo melhora significativa na maioria desses pacientes, sempre acompanhada de habilitação e/ou reabilitação auditiva. É um procedimento considerado de alta complexidade e especificidade, demandando a existência de serviços altamente especializados, equipes multiprofissionais, instalações e equipamentos bastante diferenciados. A deficiência auditiva acarreta inúmeras limitações para o desenvolvimento do indivíduo. Esta nova regulamentação prevê a implementação de ações voltadas à prevenção da deficiência auditiva e a promoção da saúde auditiva na Atenção Básica, a reorganização e o aprimoramento do atendimento na Média e na Alta Complexidade. O esforço tem sido no sentido de propiciar com a nova regulamentação, a ampliação da oferta de atendimento às pessoas com deficiência auditiva com o credenciamento/habilitação de novos estabelecimentos de saúde, aptos a prestar esse atendimento e a promover a adequação daqueles que estão em funcionamento, para isso precisaremos de normas, diretrizes e mecanismos de controle que garantam o atendimento de qualidade à população. Essa proposta pretende beneficiar um número significativo de pessoas com deficiência auditiva que necessita dessa intervenção (clinica, cirúrgica e de reabilitação), tais como, crianças, trabalhadores e idosos que hoje deixam de frequentar a escola, o trabalho e as atividades sociais poderão a partir do diagnóstico de sua capacidade auditiva, da aquisição desses equipamentos e reabilitação, exercer o seu papel social. Os recursos orçamentários, objeto desta proposta, correrão por conta do orçamento do Ministério da Saúde, devendo onerar o Programa de Trabalho 10.302.2015.8585 - Plano Orçamentário 0007 - Atenção à Saúde da População para Procedimentos de Média e Alta Complexidade, a ser incorporado ao Limite Financeiro anual de Média e Alta Complexidade dos Estados, Municípios e Distrito Federal. Os membros da CONITEC presentes na 19ª reunião do plenário, realizada nos dias 04/09/2013 e 05/09/2013, apreciaram a proposta de incorporação dos procedimentos relativos à assistência à saúde auditiva hospitalar na tabela SUS e deliberaram por recomendar a incorporação do Implante coclear e da prótese auditiva ancorada no osso (BAHA) no SUS.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Health Services Accessibility , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hospital Care , Brazil , Health Services Needs and Demand , Health Policy , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Unified Health System
9.
HNO ; 61(1): 5-11, 2013 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23223922

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Restoration of impaired auditory function through cochlear implant is possible, with high reliably and great success. Nevertheless, there are regular disputes between patients and insurance companies due to high costs. In Germany, approx. 1.9 Mio. people are severely hearing impaired. It can be estimated that for adequate hearing rehabilitation about 30,000 cochlear implants/year are necessary. Currently, less than 10% of those affected are offered cochlear implant. DISCUSSION: A handicap is defined if there is deviation from normal hearing for more than 6 months. This sets a time frame for the supply with cochlear implant after sudden deafness. The professional code requires to advice all medical options to a person seeking help for hearing loss. This includes benefit-risk consideration. At this point, the economic aspect plays no role. The indication for medical treatment is only subject to the treating physician and should not be modified by non-physicians or organizations. It should be noted that a supply of hearing aids is qualitatively different to the help from a cochlear implant, which provides a restoration of lost function. In social law (SGB V and IX) doctors are requested to advise and recommend all measures which contribute to normal hearing (both sides). This indicates that doctors may be prosecuted for not offering help when medically possible, just because health insurance employees did not approve the cost balance. CONCLUSION: The current situation, with insufficient medical care for the hearing impaired, needs clarifying. To do this, patients, health insurance companies, the political institutions, legislation and professional societies need to accept their responsibilities.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/economics , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/economics , Deafness/rehabilitation , National Health Programs/economics , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/economics , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Cooperative Behavior , Cost-Benefit Analysis/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Deafness/epidemiology , Germany , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Aids/economics , Hearing Aids/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Claim Review/economics , Insurance Claim Review/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/economics , Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Interdisciplinary Communication , Physician's Role , Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data
10.
ORL Head Neck Nurs ; 21(4): 22-5, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14621657

ABSTRACT

Hearing loss remains the most common sensory impairment in the United States. Fortunately, new treatments for this disorder are becoming available each year. This article reviews human ear anatomy, types and causes of hearing loss, and basic information on middle and inner ear implantable hearing devices. Risks, benefits, costs, and nursing care issues are discussed.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss/surgery , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Cochlear Implants/economics , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Hearing Loss/classification , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Loss/nursing , Humans , Nurse's Role , Perioperative Care/nursing , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Specialties, Nursing/organization & administration
13.
J Otolaryngol ; 16(5): 268-75, 1987 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3316687

ABSTRACT

This is a brief review of some important physiological considerations in regard to direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nerve. A summary of cochlear implant devices currently in use or under development is provided, together with some discussion on major issues relating to cochlear implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlea/physiopathology , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/physiopathology , Cochlea/innervation , Cochlear Implants/economics , Cochlear Implants/supply & distribution , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...