Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0228310, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31999757

ABSTRACT

Of all the known oviparous taxa, female birds lay the most diverse types of eggs that differ in terms of shape, shell pigmentation, and shell structure. The pigmentation of the shell, the weight of the egg, and the composition of the yolk correlate with environmental conditions and the needs of the developing embryos. In this study, we analyzed the structure and protein composition of the vitelline membrane (VM) of ring-necked pheasant, gray partridge, cockatiel parrot, and domestic pigeon eggs. We found that the VM structure is characteristic of each species and varies depending on whether the species is precocial (ring-necked pheasant and gray partridge) or superaltrical (cockatiel parrot and domestic pigeon). We hypothesize that a multilayer structure of VM is necessary to counteract the aging process of the egg. The multilayer structure of VM is only found in species with a large number of eggs in one clutch and is characterized by a long incubation period. An interesting discovery of this study is the three-layered VM of pheasant and partridge eggs. This shows that the formation of individual layers of VM in specific sections of the hen's reproductive system is not confirmed in other species. The number of protein fractions varied between 19 and 23, with a molecular weight ranging from 15 to 250 kDa, depending on the species. The number of proteins identified in the VM of the study birds' eggs is as follows: chicken-14, ring-necked pheasant-7, gray partridge-10, cockatiel parrot-6, and domestic pigeon-23. The highest number of species-specific proteins (21) was detected in the VM of domestic pigeon. This study is the first to present the structure and protein composition in the VM of ring-necked pheasant, gray partridge, cockatiel parrot, and domestic pigeon eggs. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between the hatching specification of birds and the structure of the VM.


Subject(s)
Cockatoos/embryology , Columbidae/embryology , Egg Proteins/metabolism , Galliformes/embryology , Vitelline Membrane/ultrastructure , Animals , Cockatoos/metabolism , Columbidae/metabolism , Egg Proteins/chemistry , Female , Galliformes/metabolism , Male , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Molecular Weight , Protein Interaction Maps , Proteomics/methods , Species Specificity , Vitelline Membrane/metabolism
2.
Evol Dev ; 9(6): 590-601, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17976055

ABSTRACT

Parrots (order Psittaciformes) have developed novel cranial morphology. At the same time, they show considerable morphological diversity in the cranial musculoskeletal system, which includes two novel structures: the suborbital arch and the musculus (M.) pseudomasseter. To understand comprehensively the evolutionary pattern and process of novel cranial morphology in parrots, phylogenetic and developmental studies were conducted. Firstly, we undertook phylogenetic analyses based on mitochondrial ribosomal RNA gene sequences to obtain a robust phylogeny among parrots, and secondly we surveyed the cranial morphology of parrots extensively to add new information on the character states. Character mapping onto molecular phylogenies indicated strongly the repeated evolution of both the suborbital arch and the well-developed M. pseudomasseter within parrots. These results also suggested that the direction of evolutionary change is not always identical in the two characters, implying that these characters are relatively independent or decoupled structures behaving as separate modules. Finally, we compared the developmental pattern of jaw muscles among bird species and found a difference in the timing of M. pseudomasseter differentiation between the cockatiel Nymphicus hollandicus (representative of a well-developed condition) and the peach-faced lovebird Agapornis roseicollis (representative of an underdeveloped condition). On the basis of this study, we suggest that in the development of novel traits, modularity and heterochrony facilitate the diversification of parrot cranial morphology.


Subject(s)
Jaw/anatomy & histology , Muscles/anatomy & histology , Parrots/anatomy & histology , Parrots/genetics , Skull/anatomy & histology , Animals , Cockatoos/embryology , Columbidae/embryology , Ducks/embryology , Embryo, Nonmammalian/embryology , Evolution, Molecular , Jaw/embryology , Muscles/embryology , Parrots/embryology , Phylogeny , RNA/genetics , RNA, Mitochondrial , RNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Skull/embryology , Zygote
3.
Dev Dyn ; 235(5): 1400-12, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16586442

ABSTRACT

Avian beak diversity is a classic example of morphological evolution. Recently, we showed that localized cell proliferation mediated by bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) can explain the different shapes of chicken and duck beaks (Wu et al. [2004] Science 305:1465). Here, we compare further growth activities among chicken (conical and slightly curved), duck (straight and long), and cockatiel (highly curved) developing beak primordia. We found differential growth activities among different facial prominences and within one prominence. The duck has a wider frontal nasal mass (FNM), and more sustained fibroblast growth factor 8 activity. The cockatiel has a thicker FNM that grows more vertically and a relatively reduced mandibular prominence. In each prominence the number, size, and position of localized growth zones can vary: it is positioned more rostrally in the duck and more posteriorly in the cockatiel FNM, correlating with beak curvature. BMP4 is enriched in these localized growth zones. When BMP activity is experimentally altered in all prominences, beak size was enlarged or reduced proportionally. When only specific prominences were altered, the prototypic conical shaped chicken beaks were converted into an array of beak shapes mimicking those in nature. These results suggest that the size of beaks can be modulated by the overall activity of the BMP pathway, which mediates the growth. The shape of the beaks can be fine-tuned by localized BMP activity, which mediates the range, level, and duration of locally enhanced growth. Implications of topobiology vs. molecular blueprint concepts in the Evo-Devo of avian beak forms are discussed.


Subject(s)
Beak/anatomy & histology , Biological Evolution , Birds/anatomy & histology , Animals , Beak/embryology , Beak/growth & development , Birds/embryology , Birds/growth & development , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 , Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/physiology , Chick Embryo , Chickens/anatomy & histology , Chickens/growth & development , Cockatoos/anatomy & histology , Cockatoos/embryology , Cockatoos/growth & development , Ducks/anatomy & histology , Ducks/embryology , Ducks/growth & development , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...