Effect of increasing doses of colchicine on the treatment of 333 COVID-19 inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Previous research done in Bulgaria demonstrated a fivefold reduction in mortality from COVID-19 with increased doses of colchicine from two hospitals in the country. We report here a further 333 cases of COVID-19 inpatients, treated with different doses of colchicine and its effect on mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case-control comparison from two additional hospitals was conducted between increased doses of colchicine and added bromhexine to standard of care (SOC) versus current SOC. Risk and odds ratio, as well as subgroup analysis, was conducted with newly reported data, alongside aggregate data from all hospital centers to determine the extent of mortality reduction in COVID-19 inpatients. RESULTS: There was a clear reduction in the mortality of inpatients with increasing doses of colchicine-between twofold and sevenfold. Colchicine loading doses of 4 mg are more effective than those with 2 mg. Despite these doses being higher than the so-called "standard doses," colchicine inpatients experienced lower mortality than SOC patients (5.7% vs. 19.53%). This mortality benefit was evident in different age subgroups, with a 4-mg loading dose of colchicine proving slightly superior to a 2-mg loading dose. Colchicine led to an overall relative risk reduction of 70.7%, with SOC patients having 3.91 higher odds of death. The safety of the doses was not different than the reported in the summary of product characteristics. CONCLUSION: Inpatients in Bulgaria with added colchicine and bromhexine to SOC achieved better clinical and mortality outcomes than those on SOC alone. These results question the World Health Organization-recommended strategy to inhibit viral replication. We posit that our treatment strategy to inhibit the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 entry into the cell with inhaled bromhexine and the hyperactivated NLRP3 inflammasome with higher doses of colchicine, prevents the development of cytokine storm. The timing of the initiation of treatment seems critical.

Acute Pericarditis: Rapid Evidence Review.

Acute pericarditis is defined as inflammation of the pericardium and occurs in approximately 4.4% of patients who present to the emergency department for nonischemic chest pain, with a higher prevalence in men. Although there are numerous etiologies of pericarditis, most episodes are idiopathic and the cause is presumed to be viral. Diagnosis of pericarditis requires at least two of the following criteria: new or worsening pericardial effusion, characteristic pleuritic chest pain, pericardial friction rub, or electrocardiographic changes, including new, widespread ST elevations or PR depressions. Pericardial friction rubs are highly specific but transient, and they have been reported in 18% to 84% of patients with acute pericarditis. Classic electrocardiographic findings include PR-segment depressions; diffuse, concave, upward ST-segment elevations without reciprocal changes; and T-wave inversions. Transthoracic echocardiography should be performed in all patients with acute pericarditis to characterize the size of effusions and evaluate for complications. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the first-line treatment option. Glucocorticoids should be reserved for patients with contraindications to first-line therapy and those who are pregnant beyond 20 weeks' gestation or have other systemic inflammatory conditions. Colchicine should be used in combination with first- or second-line treatments to reduce the risk of recurrence. Patients with a higher risk of complications should be admitted to the hospital for further workup and treatment.

Association between colchicine use and the risk of dementia among patients with gout: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recent findings suggest a link between gout and the development of dementia. Early treatment with colchicine is recommended as a first-line therapy for gout flares. Animal studies demonstrate that colchicine could induce cognitive impairment. This cohort study aimed to investigate the association between colchicine use and the risk of developing dementia. METHODS: In this nationwide cohort study, we performed comparative analysis on 6147 patients ≥40 years, with gout and colchicine new users against 6147 controls to assess subsequent dementia risk. The colchicine group and the control group (urate lowering therapy group) were matched on the bases of age, sex, index year, and comorbidities. All participants were followed for up to 14 years for a diagnosis of dementia considering medical records were retrospectively checked over this period. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analyses were performed to validate our findings. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of dementia for colchicine users was 1.45 (95% CI = 1.05, 1.99) relative to comparison group after adjusting for sex, age, and comorbidities. Sensitivity analysis aiming to minimize underdiagnosed occult dementia at the time of index year yielded consistent positive association. In higher accumulative dose colchicine group (cumulative defined daily dose [cDDD] >30), the aHR of dementia risk for colchicine users was 1.42 (95% CI = 1.03, 1.97) compared with nonusers. For those duration of colchicine use >30 days, the aHR was 1.53 (95% CI = 1.01-2.32) compared to the nonuser group. CONCLUSIONS: A significant risk of dementia was observed in this study in patients with gout using colchicine at higher cDDD and for a longer period. Further research is needed to elucidate the relationship between colchicine, gout, and dementia.

In patients with type 2 diabetes and recent MI, colchicine reduced a composite CV outcome at 23 mo.

SOURCE CITATION: Roubille F, Bouabdallaoui N, Kouz S, et al. Low-dose colchicine in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent myocardial infarction in the COLchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT). Diabetes Care. 2024;47:467-470. 38181203.

Colchicine for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Potential Global Implementation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Targeting traditional cardiovascular risk factors is effective in reducing recurrent cardiovascular events, yet the presence of residual cardiovascular risk due to underlying systemic inflammation is a largely unaddressed opportunity. This review aims to comprehensively assess the evolving role of colchicine as a therapeutic approach targeting residual inflammatory risk in the context of those with coronary artery disease (CAD). RECENT FINDINGS: Inflammation plays a significant role in promoting atherosclerosis, and targeting anti-inflammatory pathways has the potential to decrease cardiovascular events. Low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg/day orally), when added to guideline-directed medical care for CAD, safely decreases major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 31% in stable atherosclerosis patients and 23% in those after recent myocardial infarctions. Meta-analyses of recent randomized control trials further support both the efficacy and safety of colchicine, particularly when added to other standard cardiovascular therapies, including statin therapy. The European Society of Cardiology and other national guidelines endorse the use of low-dose colchicine in patients across the spectrum of CAD. Recently, colchicine was FDA-approved in the United States as the first anti-inflammatory therapy for the reduction of cardiovascular events. In a period of a rising incidence of CAD across the globe, colchicine represents a unique opportunity to decrease MACE due to its large magnitude of benefits and general affordability. However, challenges with drug interactions must be addressed, especially in those regions where HIV, hepatitis, and tuberculosis are prevalent. Colchicine is safe and effective at reducing cardiovascular events across a broad spectrum of coronary syndromes. The ability to simultaneously target traditional risk factors and mitigate residual inflammatory risk marks a substantial advancement in cardiovascular prevention strategies, heralding a new era in the global battle against CAD.

Colchicine Blocks Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development by Maintaining Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Homeostasis.

Development of non-surgical treatment of human abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has clinical significance. Colchicine emerges as an effective therapeutic regimen in cardiovascular diseases. Yet, whether colchicine slows AAA growth remain controversy. Here, we demonstrated that daily intragastric administration of low-dose colchicine blocked AAA formation, prevented vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) phenotype switching and apoptosis, and vascular inflammation in both peri-aortic CaPO4 injury and subcutaneous angiotensin-II infusion induced experimental AAA mice models. Mechanistically, colchicine increased global mRNA stability by inhibiting the METTL14/YTHDC1-mediated m6A modification, resulting in increased sclerostin (SOST) expression and consequent inactivation of the WNT/ß-catenin signaling pathway in vascular SMCs from mouse AAA lesions and in cultured human aortic SMCs. Moreover, human and mouse AAA lesions all showed increased m6A methylation, decreased SOST expression, and skewed synthetic SMC de-differentiation phenotype, compared to those without AAA. This study uncovers a novel mechanism of colchicine in slowing AAA development by using the METTL14/SOST/WNT/ß-catenin axis to control vascular SMC homeostasis in mouse aortic vessels and in human aortic SMCs. Therefore, use of colchicine may benefit AAA patients in clinical practice.

The role of colchicine in the management of COVID-19: a Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has robustly affected the global healthcare and economic systems and it was caused by coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The clinical presentation of the disease ranges from a flu-like illness to severe pneumonia and death. Till September 2022, the cumulative number of cases exceeded 600 million worldwide and deaths were more than 6 million. Colchicine is an alkaloid drug that is used in many autoinflammatory conditions e.g., gout, familial Mediterranean fever, and Behçet's syndrome. Colchicine inhibits the production of superoxide and the release of interleukins that stimulate the inflammatory cascade. Colchicine decreases the differentiation of myofibroblast and the release of fibrotic mediators including transforming growth factor (TGF-ß1) that are related to the fibrosis. Moreover, colchicine has been used to traet viral myocarditis caused by CMV or EBV, interstitial pneumonia, and pericarditis resulting from influenza B infection. Additionally, colchicine is considered safe and affordable with wide availability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to assess the evidence of colchicine effectiveness in COVID-19 treatment. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was done till May 2022 and yielded 814 articles after ranking the articles according to authors and year of publication. Only 8 clinical trials and cohort studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included for further steps of data collection, analysis, and reporting. RESULTS: This meta-analysis involved 16,488 patients; 8146 patients in the treatment group and 8342 patients in the control group. The results showed that colchicine resulted in a significant reduction in the mortality rate among patients received colchicine in comparison with placebo or standard care (RR 0.35, 95%CI: 0.15-0.79). Colchicine resulted in a significant decrease in the need for O2 therapy in patients with COVID-19 (RR 0.07, 95%CI 0.02-0.27, P = 0.000024). However, colchicine had no significant effect on the following outcomes among COVID-19 patients: the need for hospitalization, ICU admission, artificial ventilation, and hospital discharge rate. Among the PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients, colchicine decreased the hospitalization rate (RR 0.75, 95%CI 0.57-0.99, P = 0.042). However, colchicine had no effect on mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation among this subgroup. CONCLUSION: Colchicine caused a significant clinical improvement among COVID-19 patients as compared with the standard care or placebo, in terms of the need for O2, and mortality. This beneficial effect could play a role in the management of COVID-19 especially severe cases to decrease need for oxygen and to decrease mortality among these patients.

The effect of colchicine on cancer risk in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a time-dependent study based on the Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.

BACKGROUND: To determine the effect of colchicine on cancer risk in patients with the immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs)-related to colchicine use. METHODS: This is a time-dependent propensity-matched general population study based on the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. We identified the IMIDs patients (n = 111,644) newly diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM)-274,712, 135, 136.1, 279.49, 518.3, 287.0, 696.0, 696.1, 696.8, 420, 429.4, 710.0, 710.1, 710.3, 710.4, 714.0, 720, 55.0, 55.1, 55.9, 556. INCLUSION CRITERIA: aged ≧ 20 years, if a patient had at least these disease diagnosis requirements within 1 year of follow-up, and, these patients had at least two outpatient visits or an inpatient visit. After propensity-matched according to age, sex, comorbidities, medications and index date, the IMIDs patients enter into colchicine users (N = 16,026) and colchicine nonusers (N = 16,026). Furthermore, time-dependent Cox models were used to analyze cancer risk in propensity-matched colchicine users compared with the nonusers. The cumulative cancer incidence was analyzed using Cox proportional regression analysis. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for cancer after adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, and use of medicine including acetylcysteine, medication for smoking cessation such as nicotine replacement medicines (the nicotine patch) and pill medicines (varenicline), anti-inflammatory drugs and immunosuppressant drugs. RESULTS: Comparing the colchicine nonusers, all cancer risk were mildly attenuated, the (aHR (95% CI)) of all cancer is (0.84 (0.55, 0.99)). Meanwhile, the colchicine users were associated with the lower incidence of the colorectal cancer, the (aHRs (95% CI)) is (0.22 (0.19, 0.89)). Those aged < 65 years and male/female having the colchicine users were associated with lower risk the colorectal cancer also. Moreover, the colchicine > 20 days use with the lower aHR for colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Colchicine was associated with the lower aHR of the all cancer and colorectal cancer formation in patients with the IMIDs.

An "On Demand" canakinumab regimen for treating children with Colchicine-Resistant familial Mediterranean fever - A multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: Canakinumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeted at interleukin-1 beta, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in preventing familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) attacks among individuals with colchicine-resistant (crFMF). The manufacturer orders prescribe monthly subcutaneous injections. However, a subset of our patients is treated with an "canakinumab on demand " (COD) strategy, with wider intervals between drug administrations. Therefore, we aimed to compare disease activity and drug safety between COD and "canakinumab fixed frequency" (CFF) policies. METHODS: This retrospective study collected data from three Israeli paediatric rheumatology centres, of children with crFMF who were treated with canakinumab. Epidemiological and clinical parameters, cumulative drug dosages, and adverse events were compared between children treated by both policies. RESULTS: Twenty-five (49 %) children were treated according to COD policy and 26 according to CFF policy. Demographic parameters and most of the disease features did not differ significantly between the groups. Both groups showed significant reduction in attacks after canakinumab introduction. The median number (interquartile range) of attacks per month did not differ significantly between the COD and CFF groups (0.33 (0.08, 0.58) and 0.13 (0, 0.5), respectively, p = 0.485 (even though, per definition, COD patients presumably had an attack before receiving the second canakinumab dose). The mean monthly dose was lower for the COD than the CFF group (1.13 ± 1.13 vs. 3.16 ± 1.46 mg/kg, p < 0.001). Adverse events were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: For individuals with crFMF, COD compared to CFF policy can achieve similar efficacy and safety, with a lower accumulated canakinumab dose, rendering it less immunosuppressive and less expensive.

Efficacy and safety of colchicine for atrial fibrillation prevention: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia, is closely related to inflammation. Colchicine has the potent anti-inflammatory effects. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy and safety of colchicine in the prevention of AF but the results are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of colchicine on AF. METHOD AND RESULTS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for related studies until Jan 8, 2024. A total of 17 studies including 16,238 participants were included. Compared to the placebo group, there were fewer incidences of AF in the colchicine group (RR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.68-0.83, P < 0.001). The incidence of overall adverse events and overall gastrointestinal intolerance did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, diarrhea, nausea, and discontinuation occurred more frequently in patients treated with colchicine. CONCLUSION: Colchicine can prevent patients from the incidence of AF, regardless of the mean age of patients, type of atrial fibrillation, maintenance dose, duration of colchicine use, cumulative daily dose, and follow-up time with more diarrhea, nausea and discontinuation. These adverse events can be avoided by low doses (0.5 mg once daily) and long period time of colchicine use.

High systemic inflammation as a novel cardiovascular risk factor and target for anti-cytokine therapy: comment regarding the triglyceride glucose index.

In the last century, there has been more than enough research that proved the association of high lipid and glucose levels with cardiovascular disease, thus establishing the current well-known traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as dyslipidemia, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Hence, these cardiovascular risk factors are target therapy for glucose and lipid-lowering agents to prevent adverse cardiovascular events. However, despite controlling the lipid and glucose levels, some studies demonstrated the subclinical atherosclerosis suggesting that these cardiovascular risk factors alone cannot account for the entire atherosclerosis burden. In the last years, large-scale clinical trials demonstrated the operation of the inflammatory pathway in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) by the immune system, both the innate (neutrophils, macrophages) and adaptive (T cell and other lymphocytes) limbs, contribute to atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis. In this regard, some studies that use antiinflammatory therapy targeting the immune system by modulating or blocking interleukins, also known as anti-cytokine therapy, have been shown to reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with previous coronary artery disease. In this regard, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of colchicine 0.5 mg once daily for reducing cardiovascular events in patients who have established ASCVD and high residual systemic inflammation. Therefore, measuring the systemic inflammation can improve the cardiovascular risk assessment and identify the subsets of patients that will benefit from anti-cytokine therapy after diagnosis of ASCVD or after myocardial revascularization.

Colchicine's Role in Cardiovascular Disease Management.

Colchicine-an anti-inflammatory alkaloid-has assumed an important role in the management of cardiovascular inflammation ≈3500 years after its first medicinal use in ancient Egypt. Primarily used in high doses for the treatment of acute gout flares during the 20th century, research in the early 21st century demonstrated that low-dose colchicine effectively treats acute gout attacks, lowers the risk of recurrent pericarditis, and can add to secondary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events. As the first Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted anti-inflammatory cardiovascular therapy, colchicine currently has a unique role in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The safe use of colchicine requires careful monitoring for drug-drug interactions, changes in kidney and liver function, and counseling regarding gastrointestinal upset. Future research should elucidate the mechanisms of anti-inflammatory effects of colchicine relevant to atherosclerosis, the potential role of colchicine in primary prevention, in other cardiometabolic conditions, colchicine's safety in cardiovascular patients, and opportunities for individualizing colchicine therapy using clinical and molecular diagnostics.

Update on the Role of Colchicine in Cardiovascular Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on the use of colchicine to target inflammation to prevent cardiovascular events among those at-risk for or with established coronary artery disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug that reduces cardiovascular events through its effect on the IL-1ß/IL-6/CRP pathway, which promotes the progression and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques. Clinical trials have demonstrated that colchicine reduces cardiovascular events by 31% among those with chronic coronary disease, and by 23% among those with recent myocardial infarction. Its ability to dampen inflammation during an acute injury may broaden its scope of use in patients at risk for cardiovascular events after major non-cardiac surgery. Colchicine is an effective anti-inflammatory therapy in the prevention of acute coronary syndrome. Ongoing studies aim to assess when, and in whom, colchicine is most effective to prevent cardiovascular events in patients at-risk for or with established coronary artery disease.

Network Pharmacology Analysis of the Therapeutic Potential of Colchicine in Acute Lung Injury.

Background: This study employed integrated network pharmacology approach to explore the mechanisms underlying the protective effect of colchicine against acute lung injury (ALI). Methods: We analyzed the expression profiles from 13 patients with sepsis-related ALI and 21 controls to identify differentially expressed genes and key modules. ALI-related genes were curated using databases such as DisGeNET, Therapeutic Target, and Comparative Toxicogenomics Database to curate ALI-related genes. Drug target fishing for colchicine was conducted using the DrugBank, BATMAN-TCM, STITCH, and SwissTargetPrediction. Potential drug-disease interactions were determined by intersecting ALI-associated genes with colchicine target genes. We performed comprehensive pathway and process enrichment analyses on these genes. A protein-protein interaction network was constructed, and topological analysis was executed. Additionally, an ALI mouse model was established to evaluate the effect of colchicine on CXCL12 and CXCR4 levels through western blot analysis. Results: Analysis revealed 23 potential colchicine-ALI interaction genes from the intersection of 253 ALI-associated genes and 389 colchicine targets. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted several inflammation-related pathways, such as cytokine-mediated signaling pathway, CXCR chemokine receptor binding, NF-kappa B signaling pathway, TNF signaling pathway, and IL-17 signaling pathway. The protein-protein interaction network demonstrated complex interactions for CXCL12 and CXCR4 among other candidate genes, with significant topological interaction degrees. In vivo studies showed that colchicine significantly reduced elevated CXCL12 and CXCR4 levels in ALI mice. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that colchicine's therapeutic effect on ALI might derive from its anti-inflammatory properties. Further research is needed to explore the specific mechanisms of colchicine's interaction with sepsis-induced ALI.

Colchicine in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Inflammation has a direct role in the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease, and oral colchicine displays broad anti-inflammatory properties. Several large, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated colchicine's impact on cardiovascular outcomes. Results from a meta-analysis of these trials demonstrate that colchicine reduces the risk of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) by 25%, leading to its recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Despite this, colchicine has not been shown to confer any survival benefit in these trials. The non-significant reduction in cardiovascular death of 18% (95% CI: 45% decrease to 23% increase) is outweighed by a more prominent, borderline non-significant increase in the risk of non-cardiovascular death by 38% (95% CI: 1% decrease to 92% increase). Key populations including those with heart failure, those undergoing surgical revascularisation, women, elderly individuals and non-Caucasians are under-represented in completed trials, which limits generalisability. C reactive protein has been proposed as a biomarker for colchicine response and shows promise for identifying a high-risk population where the benefit on MACE reduction and specifically reduced cardiovascular death might outweigh any real increased risk of non-cardiovascular death; however, this approach is still to be validated in ongoing RCTs. In conclusion, while colchicine shows promise in reducing MACE, its net risk-benefit profile requires further elucidation before its widespread adoption into clinical practice for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Much more large-scale, long-term trial data are still needed in this space.