Tolerability and efficacy of colestipol hydrochloride for accelerated elimination of teriflunomide.

BACKGROUND: Teriflunomide is an oral disease modifying therapy approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Teriflunomide' s pharmacokinetics (PK) contribute to its slow elimination, on average taking 6-8 months, though it can take up to 2 years in some instances. This slow elimination can become problematic in certain clinical situations - such as during pregnancy, when teriflunomide has potential teratogenic effects. In such scenarios, an accelerated elimination procedure (AEP) is recommended. Currently, AEPs with oral cholestyramine or activated charcoal are available but are restricted by adverse effects, limited administration routes, and dosing frequencies. METHODS: A single-center, PK interaction study was performed in a total of 14 healthy volunteers, to investigate colestipol hydrochloride (HCl) as an alternative to cholestyramine for the elimination of teriflunomide. Participants received teriflunomide for 14 days, followed by an AEP with colestipol HCl for 15 days. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The administration of colestipol HCl for 15 days was sufficient to reduce plasma teriflunomide concentrations by greater than 96%. Although colestipol HCl did not completely eliminate teriflunomide with the same effectiveness as cholestyramine, it may offer an alternative method for accelerated elimination of teriflunomide with potentially improved tolerability and more favorable dosing and administration options.

Feasibility study of colestipol as an oral phosphate binder in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Currently available calcium- and aluminium-based phosphate binders are dose limited because of potential toxicity, and newer proprietary phosphate binders are expensive. We examined phosphate-binding effects of the bile acid sequestrant colestipol, a non-proprietary drug that is in the same class as sevelamer. METHODS: The trial was an 8 week prospective feasibility study in stable hemodialysis patients using colestipol as the only phosphate binder, preceded and followed by a washout phase of all other phosphate binders. The primary study endpoint was weekly measurements of serum phosphate. Secondary endpoints were serum calcium, lipids and coagulation status. Analyses used random effects mixed models. RESULTS: Thirty patients were screened for participation of which 26 met criteria for treatment. At a mean dose of 8.8 g/24 h of colestipol by study end, serum phosphate dropped from 2.24 to 1.96 mmol/L (P < 0.001). Three patients required calcium supplementation. LDL cholesterol dropped from 1.75 to 1.2 mmol/L (P < 0.001). Three patients dropped out because of side effects or intolerance of the required dose. CONCLUSION: The results support the feasibility of a larger trial to determine the efficacy of colestipol as a phosphate binder and that other non-proprietary anion-exchange resins may also warrant investigation.

Alteration of aluminium inhibition of synaptosomal (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase by colestipol administration.

The ability of aluminium to inhibit the (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase activity has been observed by several authors. During chronic dietary exposure to AlCl3, brain (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase activity drops, even if no alterations of catalytic subunit protein expression and of energy charge potential are observed. The aluminium effect on (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase activity seems to implicate the reduction of interacting protomers within the oligomeric ensemble of the membrane-bound (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase. The activity of (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase is altered by the microviscosity of lipid environment. We studied if aluminium inhibitory effect on (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase is modified by alterations in synaptosomal membrane cholesterol content. Adult male Wistar rats were submitted to chronic dietary AlCl3 exposure (0.03 g/day of AlCl3) and/or to colestipol, a hypolidaemic drug (0.31 g/day) during 4 months. The activity of (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase was studied in brain cortex synaptosomes with different cholesterol contents. Additionally, we incubate synaptosomes with methyl-ß-cyclodextrin for both enrichment and depletion of membrane cholesterol content, with or without 300 µM AlCl3. This enzyme activity was significantly reduced by micromolar AlCl3 added in vitro and when aluminium was orally administered to rats. The oral administration of colestipol reduced the cholesterol content and concomitantly inhibited the (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase. The aluminium inhibitory effect on synaptosomal (Na(+)/K(+))ATPase was reduced by cholesterol depletion both in vitro and in vivo.

Effect of concomitant colestipol hydrochloride administration on the bioavailability of diltiazem from immediate- and sustained-release formulations.

Effects of concomitant colestipol administration on plasma concentrations of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem from immediate-release (IR) and sustained-release (SR) formulations were assessed in two studies. In the first study, 12 subjects received 120-mg diltiazem hydrochloride (diltiazem) SR capsules or 120-mg diltiazem IR tablets administered alone and in combination with colestipol hydrochloride (colestipol). Following concomitant administration of SR diltiazem with colestipol, AUC(0-infinity ) and C(max), respectively, were 22 and 36% less, and were 27 and 33% lower for IR diltiazem. In the second study, subjects received 120-mg diltiazem SR capsules at staggered times, without colestipol, 1 h prior to or 4 h following multiple doses of colestipol. A 17% decrease in AUC(0-infinity ) was observed when diltiazem was taken 1 h before colestipol was given, and a 22% decrease when diltiazem was taken 4 h after colestipol, relative to diltiazem SR alone. C(max) values were similarly decreased. Results from these two studies show that colestipol can cause a significant decrease in diltiazem absorption from both IR and SR dosage forms. Staggering the administration of colestipol and diltiazem SR did not blunt this effect, indicating that concomitant administration of diltiazem and colestipol should be used with caution, and that the efficacy of diltiazem should be monitored to assure adequate dosing.

A randomized crossover trial of combination pharmacologic therapy in children with familial hyperlipidemia.

We sought to determine whether a low-dose combination of a bile acid-binding resin (colestipol) with an hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor (pravastatin) would result in improved acceptability, compliance, and effectiveness in lipid-lowering compared with conventional therapy with a higher dose of a bile acid-binding resin only, with fewer side effects. We performed a randomized, crossover open-label clinical trial with two 18-wk medication regimens separated by an 8-wk washout period in 36 children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia or familial combined hyperlipidemia. The regimens included colestipol 10 g/d (10 pills) versus a combination of colestipol 5 g/d with pravastatin 10 mg/d (six pills). All patients were maintained on a fat-reduced diet. Acceptability was better with the combination regimen. Mean compliance was similar and suboptimal (approximately 60%) with all medication components. Mean relative LDL cholesterol lowering was significantly better with the combination regimen (-17 +/- 16% versus -10 +/- 13%; p = 0.045), although insufficient to achieve recommended target values in the majority of patients on either regimen. Both regimens were equally free of adverse effects, with no important effect on chemistry or hematologic values. Patient-reported adverse effects were more common with the conventional-dose colestipol-only regimen. Compliance with medication regimens using the bile acid-binding resins is suboptimal, although combination with a low dose of a statin may result in better lipid lowering.

Evidence for a new pathophysiological mechanism for coronary artery disease regression: hepatic lipase-mediated changes in LDL density.

BACKGROUND: Small, dense LDL particles are associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) and predict angiographic changes in response to lipid-lowering therapy. Intensive lipid-lowering therapy in the Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study (FATS) resulted in significant improvement in CAD. This study examines the relationship among LDL density, hepatic lipase (HL), and CAD progression, identifying a new biological mechanism for the favorable effects of lipid-altering therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-eight of the subjects in FATS with documented coronary disease, apolipoprotein B levels >/=125 mg/dL, and family history of CAD were selected for this study. They were randomly assigned to receive lovastatin (40 mg/d) and colestipol (30 g/d), niacin (4 g/d) and colestipol, or conventional therapy with placebo alone or with colestipol in those with elevated LDL cholesterol levels. Plasma hepatic lipase (HL), lipoprotein lipase, and LDL density were measured when subjects were and were not receiving lipid-lowering therapy. LDL buoyancy increased with lovastatin-colestipol therapy (7.7%; P<0.01) and niacin-colestipol therapy (10.3%; P<0.01), whereas HL decreased in both groups (-14% [P<0.01] and -17% [P<0.01] with lovastatin-colestipol and niacin-colestipol, respectively). Changes in LDL buoyancy and HL activity were associated with changes in disease severity (P<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, an increase in LDL buoyancy was most strongly associated with CAD regression, accounting for 37% of the variance of change in coronary stenosis (P<0.01), followed by reduction in apolipoprotein Bl (5% of variance; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These studies support the hypothesis that therapy-associated changes in HL alter LDL density, which favorably influences CAD progression. This is a new and potentially clinically relevant mechanism linking lipid-altering therapy to CAD improvement.

Use of niacin, statins, and resins in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

Patients in the original Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study (FATS) cohort were subgrouped into those with triglyceride levels < or = 120 mg/dL (n = 26) and those with triglyceride levels > or = 190 mg/dL (n = 40). Their therapeutic responses to niacin plus colestipol, lovastatin plus colestipol, colestipol alone, or placebo were determined. Therapeutic response was also determined in the same 2 triglyceride subgroups (n = 12 and n = 27, respectively) of patients selected for low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and coronary artery disease. These triglyceride criteria were chosen to identify patient subgroups with high likelihood of "pattern A" (normal-size low-density lipoprotein [LDL] particles and triglyceride < or = 120 mg/dL) or "pattern B" (small dense LDL and triglyceride > or = 190 mg/dL). Our findings in these small patient subgroups are consistent with the emerging understanding that coronary artery disease patients presenting with high triglyceride levels have lower HDL-C, smaller less buoyant LDL-C, and greater very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and VLDL apolipoprotein B, and are more responsive to therapy as assessed by an increase in HDL-C and reduction in triglycerides, VLDL-C, and VLDL apolipoprotein B. In the FATS high-triglyceride subgroup with these characteristics, a tendency toward greater therapeutic improvement in coronary stenosis severity was observed among those treated with either of the 2 forms of intensive cholesterol-lowering therapy. This improvement is associated with therapeutic reduction of LDL-C and elevation of HDL-C, but also appears to be associated with drug-induced improvement in LDL buoyancy.

Role of colestipol in the treatment of hyperthyroidism.

The enterohepatic circulation of thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) is higher in thyrotoxicosis. Bile-salt sequestrants bind iodothyronines and thereby increase their fecal excretion. We, therefore, evaluated the effect of colestipol-hydrochloride administration on clinical and biochemical indices of patients with hyperthyroidism. In a prospective, controlled trial, ninety-two adult volunteers with Graves' disease, toxic autonomous nodule or toxic multinodular goiter were randomly assigned into the following treatment protocols: Group 1, 30 mg of methimazole (MMI) and 20 g of colestipol-hydrochloride (COL) daily; Group 2, 30 mg of MMI daily; and Group 3, 15 mg of MMI 20 g of COL daily. The patients were further classified into Group A, severe hyperthyroidism (baseline levels of total T3 (TT3) > or =5 nmol/l) and Group B, mild to moderate thyrotoxicosis (baseline levels of TT-3<5 nmol/l). Crook's clinical index, serum free T4 (FT4), TT3 and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels were determined before (WO), following one week (W1) and two weeks (W2) of treatment. Serum TT3 level decreased (mean+/-SE) at W1 by 40.8+/-2.6% of WO in Group1 and by 29.2+/-2.4% in Group 2 (p<0.001), and down further to 47.8+/-3.0% at W2 in Group 1, and 40.6+/-2.8% in Group 2 (p=0.01). Serum FT4 level decreased (mean+/-SE) from WO to W1 by 31.7+/-2.7% in Group 1 and by 16.2+/-3.1% in Group 2 (p=0.005), and down to 49.1+/-2.8% of WO at W2 in Group 1 and to 38.7+/-3.5% in Group 2 (p=0.07). In sub groups B COL was not effective in reducing thyroid hormone levels nor in ameliorating the clinical status of the patients. However, in Group A3 COL lowered FT4 (p=0.001) and TT3 (p=0.05) levels as compared to group A2. At W2 the clinical hyperthyroidism score improved faster in Group A1 (p<0.001) and Group A3 (p=0.012) as compared to the control Group A2. In conclusion, COL is an effective and well tolerated adjunctive agent in the treatment of hyperthyroidism. Its main effect is in severe cases of thyrotoxicosis, and in the first phase of treatment. As adjunctive COL treatment in hyperthyroidism allows reducing MMI dosage it may decrease the rate of dose dependent MMI side effects.

Colestipol tablets in adolescents with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

The objective of this study was to examine palatability and side effects of the new tablet formulation of colestipol. A clinical series of 23 boys and 4 girls aged 10-16 years with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia were given 2-12 g colestipol daily for 6 months in an open study. There were no serious side effects. The median reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 20%. All preferred the tablets to resin granules they had tried previously. We conclude that low-dose colestipol tablets appear to be safe and effective, and are preferred by adolescents.

Levels of soluble cell adhesion molecules in patients with dyslipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Increased expression of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) on the vascular endothelium has been postulated to play an important role in atherogenesis. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that dyslipidemia may increase expression of CAMs. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine whether dyslipidemia is associated with increased expression of CAMs, we examined the levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1), and soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin) in individuals with either hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia and in control subjects matched for age and sex. Patients with hypertriglyceridemia had significantly higher levels of sVCAM-1 (739 +/- 69 ng/mL) compared with patients with hypercholesterolemia (552 +/- 63 ng/mL) and control subjects (480 +/- 56 ng/mL). Levels of sICAM-1 were significantly increased in both the hypercholesterolemic and hypertriglyceridemic groups (298 +/- 29 and 342 +/- 31 ng/mL, respectively) compared with the control group (198 +/- 14 ng/mL). Levels of sE-selectin were significantly increased in hypercholesterolemic patients (74 +/- 9 ng/mL) compared with control subjects (48 +/- 5 ng/mL). Ten hypercholesterolemic patients were treated aggressively with atorvastatin alone or a combination of colestipol and either atorvastatin or simvastatin for a mean of 42 weeks and had an average LDL cholesterol reduction of 51%. Comparison of soluble CAMs before and after treatment showed a significant reduction only in sE-selectin (77 +/- 11 versus 56 +/- 6 ng/mL, P < or = .03) but not for sVCAM-1 or sICAM-1. CONCLUSIONS: Although severe hyperlipidemia is associated with increased levels of soluble CAMs, aggressive lipid-lowering treatment had only limited effects on the levels. Increased levels of soluble CAMs in patients with hyperlipidemia may be a marker for atherosclerosis.

Four years' treatment efficacy of patients with severe hyperlipidemia. Lipid lowering drugs versus LDL-apheresis.

A total of 47 patients suffering from heterozygous hyperlipidemia were treated with LDL-apheresis (24 patients, aged 49.5 +/- 11.5 years), diet and/or lipid-lowering drugs or with diet and lipid-lowering drugs only (23 patients, aged 48.0 +/- 11.9 years). After treatment periods of 44.4 +/- 14.3 (apheresis group) and 33.5 +/- 15.9 (drug group) months, respectively, the ensuing results revealed significant differences (p < 0.0001): total cholesterol decreased from 10.4 to 5.5 vs 9.9 to 8.7 mmol/l, LDL from 7.4 to 3.9 vs 6.6 to 5.2 mmol/l, triglycerides from 5.8 to 3.7 vs 4.8 to 4.1 mmol/l and the LDL/HDL-ratio decreased from 7.1 to 3.4 vs 6.7 to 5.8. In the apheresis group one patient died from myocardial infarction vs one non-fatal myocardial infarction and the manifestation of coronary heart disease in three cases in the drug group. There were no severe side-effects in either group. All patients in the apheresis group experienced an increased clinical performance. On the other hand physological well-being of these patients was lower than that of the drug group (scores 42.3 +/- 8.9 vs 50.2 +/- 9.9, p < 0.002). The present trial suggests that a continuing reduction in serum lipid concentrations may lower in a dose dependent manner the risk of development and progression of coronary heart disease. With respect to clinical and laboratory results, LDL-apheresis seems safe and appears to be the most effective therapy.

Combination therapy with colestipol and psyllium mucilloid in patients with hyperlipidemia.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether combining psyllium mucilloid with half the usual dose of colestipol reduces the adverse effects associated with colestipol and maintains or increases its efficacy in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. This strategy might make bile acid sequestrants, which are seldom used because they cause adverse effects such as bloating and constipation, more tolerable and less expensive. DESIGN: A randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: An outpatient clinic in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: 121 patients who had moderate primary hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol level > 6 mmol/L and < 8 mmol/L; triglyceride level < 3 mmol/L) after following a low-fat diet for 1 year (National Cholesterol Education Program Step Two diet). INTERVENTION: 5 g of cellulose placebo; 5 g of colestipol; 2.5 g of colestipol plus 2.5 g of psyllium; or 5 g of psyllium three times daily before meals for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At baseline and at weeks 4 and 10, fasting blood lipid levels and apoprotein concentrations were measured and a quality-of-life instrument was completed. RESULTS: A combination of 2.5 g of psyllium and 2.5 g of colestipol was better tolerated than and as effective as either 5 g of colestipol alone or 5 g of psyllium alone. The combination therapy and colestipol alone did not differ significantly with respect to changes in individual lipid values. The ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) was reduced by 18.2% (95% CI, 12.3% to 24%) with the combination therapy; by 10.6% (CI, 2.0% to 15.4%) with colestipol alone; by 6.1% (CI, 1.5% to 10.6%) with psyllium alone; and by 0.1% (CI, -4.8% to 7%) with placebo (P = 0.0002). Combination therapy reduced the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL significantly more than did colestipol alone or psyllium alone (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that adding psyllium to half the usual dose of bile acid sequestrant resins maintains the efficacy and improves the tolerability of these resins.

Discordant regulation of proteins of cholesterol metabolism during the acute phase response.

Recent studies have shown that the administration of endotoxin (LPS) and cytokines to Syrian hamsters increases serum cholesterol levels, hepatic cholesterol synthesis, and the activity, protein levels, and mRNA levels of hepatic HMG-CoA reductase. Despite the greater than 10-fold increase in HMG-CoA reductase mRNA levels, LPS had only minimal effects on hepatic LDL receptor mRNA levels. In the present study, we demonstrate that LPS increases the transcription rate in the liver of HMG-CoA reductase mRNA approximately 4- to 5-fold without affecting LDL receptor mRNA transcription. Most stimuli that regulate HMG-CoA reductase and LDL receptor mRNA levels also regulate, in parallel, HMG-CoA synthase and farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) synthetase. However, in chow-fed animals, LPS and cytokines (TNF, IL-1, TNF + IL-1) increased hepatic HMG-CoA reductase mRNA levels without increasing LDL receptor, HMG-CoA synthase, or FPP synthetase mRNA levels. The feeding of cholesterol or bile resin binders regulates the mRNA levels of HMG-CoA reductase, LDL receptor, HMG-CoA synthase, and FPP synthetase. In both cholesterol- and colestipol-fed animals, LPS increased HMG-CoA reductase mRNA levels while either decreasing or causing minimal increases in the mRNA levels of the other proteins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Enhanced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and cost-effectiveness by low-dose colestipol plus lovastatin combination therapy.

A total of 96 patients with moderate elevations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were randomly assigned to 4 different double-blind treatment regimens: placebo; colestipol 5 g and lovastatin 20 mg/day (C5 + L20); colestipol 10 g and lovastatin 20 mg/day (C10 + L20); and lovastatin 40 mg/day (L40). During 12 weeks of therapy, C10 + L20 achieved the greatest reduction in total cholesterol (-32%) and LDL cholesterol (-48%) levels from baseline. This combination also exhibited significantly greater reductions in LDL cholesterol levels than the C5 + L20 and L40 groups (p < 0.01). The differences in total and LDL cholesterol reduction between the C5 + L20 and L40 groups were not significant. Similar changes and differences between treatments were seen in apolipoprotein B levels. Whereas mean total apolipoprotein A-I levels increased with all treatments (p < 0.05), lipoprotein particles A-I were significantly increased in the C10 + L20 group (p < 0.01) only. Results demonstrate that the combination of low-dose lovastatin (20 mg/day) with low-dose colestipol (5 or 10 g/day) produces LDL cholesterol reductions equal to or greater than higher doses of lovastatin (40 mg/day). In addition, low-dose combinations are > 25% more cost-effective than high-dose monotherapy.

The effects of colestipol tablets compared with colestipol granules on plasma cholesterol and other lipids in moderately hypercholesterolemic patients.

The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of a new formulation of colestipol, colestipol tablets (T), with those of colestipol granules (G), in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Three hundred and seventeen patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who were following a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet (NCEP Step I diet), and had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 4.14 mmol/l (160 mg/dl) and < or = 6.46 mmol/l (250 mg/dl) were studied. Study medication was taken twice a day, with breakfast and supper, for 8 weeks. The six parallel treatment groups consisted of colestipol tablets 2 g b.i.d. and 8 g b.i.d., matching placebo tablets b.i.d., colestipol granules 2 g b.i.d. and 8 g b.i.d., and matching placebo granules b.i.d.. Study endpoints included absolute change and percentage change from baseline in selected lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein measurements; LDL-C lowering was the primary efficacy endpoint. Treatment with colestipol tablets and colestipol granules resulted in virtually identical, statistically significant (P < or = 0.05) reductions of LDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), TC/HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (apo B). Compared with placebo, all active treatments (tablets 4 g/day, tablets 16 g/day, granules 4 g/day, granules 16 g/day) significantly reduced LDL-C (12%, 24%, 12%, 25%, respectively), TC (7%, 15%, 8%, 15%, respectively), TC/HDL-C (8%, 14%, 9%, 15%, respectively) and apo B (12%, 20%, 13%, 22%, respectively). All active treatments significantly increased lipoprotein particle AI (LpAI) (5%, 23%, 14%, 18%, respectively). VLDL-C and triglycerides increased significantly in the high-dose groups. The proportions of patients reporting adverse events, largely gastrointestinal-related, were not different among the active treatment groups. The treatments were well-tolerated, and no drug-related serious adverse events were reported. Patients experienced with granule medication prior to this study preferred tablets over granules. This study demonstrates that colestipol tablets are an effective treatment to reduce LDL-C in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, are equivalent to colestipol granules, are well-tolerated, and are preferred over granules by patients.