Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35.583
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410123, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713465

ABSTRACT

Importance: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but devastating complication. Most patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) also need routine screening colonoscopy, in which transient bacteremia may be a potential source for hematogenous PJI. Patients and surgeons must decide on an optimal time span or sequence for these 2 generally elective procedures, but no such guidelines currently exist. Objective: To evaluate associations of colonoscopy with the risk of post-TJA PJI for the development of clinical practice recommendations for colonoscopy screening in patients undergoing TJA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries older than 45 years who underwent TJA from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, used propensity score matching and logistic regression to evaluate associations of colonoscopy with PJI risk. Statistical analyses were conducted between January and October 2023. Exposure: Colonoscopy status was defined by Current Procedural Terminology code for diagnostic colonoscopy within 6 months before or 6 months after TJA. Main Outcomes and Measures: Periprosthetic joint infection status was defined by a PJI International Classification of Diseases code within 1 year after TJA and within 1 year from the post-TJA index colonoscopy date. Results: Analyses included 243 671 patients (mean [SD] age, 70.4 [10.0] years; 144 083 [59.1%] female) who underwent TJA in the MHS from 2010 to 2016. In the preoperative colonoscopy cohort, 325 patients (2.8%) had PJI within 1 year postoperatively. In the postoperative colonoscopy cohort, 138 patients (1.8%) had PJI within 1 year from the index colonoscopy date. In separate analyses of colonoscopy status within 6 months before and 6 months after TJA, younger age, male sex, and several chronic health conditions (diabetes, kidney disease, and pulmonary disease) were each associated with higher PJI risk. However, no association was found with PJI risk for perioperative colonoscopy preoperatively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.98-1.23) or postoperatively (adjusted odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74-1.08). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large retrospective cohort of patients undergoing TJA, perioperative screening colonoscopy was not associated with PJI and should not be delayed for periprocedural risk. However, health conditions were independently associated with PJI and should be medically optimized.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Risk Factors
2.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 186, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Egypt faces a significant public health burden due to chronic liver diseases (CLD) and peptic ulcer disease. CLD, primarily caused by Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, affects over 2.9% of the population nationwide, with regional variations. Steatotic liver disease is rapidly emerging as a significant contributor to CLD, especially in urban areas. Acid-related disorders are another widespread condition that can significantly impact the quality of life. These factors and others significantly influence the indications and findings of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures performed in Egypt. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the clinico-demographic data, indications, and endoscopic findings in Egyptian patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in various regions of Egypt. METHODS: This study employed a retrospective multicenter cross-sectional design. Data was collected from patients referred for gastrointestinal endoscopy across 15 tertiary gastrointestinal endoscopy units in various governorates throughout Egypt. RESULTS: 5910 patients aged 38-63 were enrolled in the study; 75% underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), while 25% underwent a colonoscopy. In all studied patients, the most frequent indications for EGD were dyspepsia (19.5%), followed by hematemesis (19.06%), and melena (17.07%). The final EGD diagnoses for the recruited patients were portal hypertension-related sequelae (60.3%), followed by acid-related diseases (55%), while 10.44% of patients had a normally apparent endoscopy. Male gender, old age, and the presence of chronic liver diseases were more common in patients from upper than lower Egypt governorates. Hematochezia (38.11%) was the most reported indication for colonoscopy, followed by anemia of unknown origin (25.11%). IBD and hemorrhoids (22.34% and 21.86%, respectively) were the most prevalent diagnoses among studied patients, while normal colonoscopy findings were encountered in 18.21% of them. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study describing the situation of endoscopic procedures in Egypt. our study highlights the significant impact of regional variations in disease burden on the utilization and outcomes of GI endoscopy in Egypt. The high prevalence of chronic liver disease is reflected in the EGD findings, while the colonoscopy results suggest a potential need for increased awareness of colorectal diseases.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Humans , Male , Female , Egypt/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/statistics & numerical data , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Endoscopy, Digestive System/statistics & numerical data , Liver Diseases/epidemiology , Dyspepsia/epidemiology , Dyspepsia/etiology , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology
3.
Korean J Gastroenterol ; 83(5): 179-183, 2024 05 25.
Article in Korean | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783618

ABSTRACT

Patients with chronic constipation (CC) usually complain of mild to severe symptoms, including hard or lumpy stools, straining, a sense of incomplete evacuation after a bowel movement, a feeling of anorectal blockage, the need for digital maneuver to assist defecation, or reduced stool frequency. In clinical practice, healthcare providers need to check for 'alarm features' indicative of a colonic malignancy, such as bloody stools, anemia, unexplained weight loss, or new-onset symptoms after 50 years of age. In the Seoul Consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation, the Bristol stool form scale, colonoscopy, and digital rectal examination are useful for objectively evaluating the symptoms and making a differential diagnosis of the secondary cause of constipation. If patients with CC improve to lifestyle modification or first-line therapies, the effort to determine the subtypes of CC is usually not considered. On the other hand, if conventional therapeutic strategies fail, diagnostic testing needs to be considered to distinguish between the different subtypes of functional constipation (normal-transit constipation, slow transit constipation, or defecatory disorder) because these subtypes of constipation have different therapeutic implications and a correct diagnosis is critical. In the Seoul consensus, physiological testing is recommended for patients with functional constipation who have failed to respond to treatment with available laxatives (for a minimum of 12 weeks and recommended a therapeutic regimen) or who are strongly suspected of having a defecatory disorder. The Seoul consensus contains statements of physiological testing, including balloon expulsion test, anorectal manometry, defecography, and colon transit time.


Subject(s)
Constipation , Constipation/diagnosis , Humans , Chronic Disease , Manometry , Colonoscopy , Digital Rectal Examination , Defecography , Gastrointestinal Transit
5.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11633, 2024 05 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773186

ABSTRACT

This retrospective cohort study aimed to identify baseline patient characteristics involving modifiable lifestyle factors that are associated with the development of colorectal adenomas, and establish and validate a nomogram for risk predictions among high-risk populations with negative index colonoscopy. A total of 83,076 participants who underwent an index colonoscopy at the Tianjin Union Medical Center between 2004 and 2019 were collected. According to meticulous inclusion and exclusion criteria, 249 subjects were enrolled and categorized into the primary and validation cohorts. Based on the primary cohort, we utilized the LASSO-Cox regression and the univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) regression parallelly to select variables, and incorporated selected variables into two nomogram models established using the multivariate Cox-PH regression. Comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the two models demonstrated that the nomogram model constituted by four covariates retained by the LASSO-Cox regression, including baseline age, body mass index, physical activity and family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) in first-degree relatives, performed better at predicting adenoma-free survival probabilities. Further validation including the concordance index, calibration plots, decision curve analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves also revealed good predictive accuracy, discriminating ability, clinical utility and risk stratification capacity of the nomogram model. Our nomogram will assist high-risk individuals with negative index colonoscopy to prevent colorectal adenoma occurrence and CRC morbidity with improved cost-effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Life Style , Nomograms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adenoma/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Risk Factors , Adult , Proportional Hazards Models , ROC Curve
6.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 162, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To systematically analyze risk factors for delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) in colorectum. METHODS: We searched seven large databases from inception to July 2022 to identify studies that investigated risk factors for DPPB. The effect sizes were expressed by relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The heterogeneity was analyzed by calculating I2 values and performing sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: A total of 15 articles involving 24,074 subjects were included in the study. The incidence of DPPB was found to be 0.02% (95% CI, 0.01-0.03), with an I2 value of 98%. Our analysis revealed that male sex (RR = 1.64), history of hypertension (RR = 1.54), anticoagulation (RR = 4.04), polyp size (RR = 1.19), polyp size ≥ 10 mm (RR = 2.43), polyp size > 10 mm (RR = 3.83), polyps located in the right semicolon (RR = 2.48) and endoscopic mucosal resection (RR = 2.99) were risk factors for DPPB. CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, hypertension, anticoagulation, polyp size, polyp size ≥ 10 mm, polyps located in the right semicolon, and endoscopic mucosal resection were the risk factors for DPPB. Based on our findings, we recommend that endoscopists should fully consider and implement effective intervention measures to minimize the risk of DPPB.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Hypertension , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Humans , Risk Factors , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hypertension/complications , Sex Factors , Male , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Colonoscopy , Female , Incidence
7.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 69: 101907, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749583

ABSTRACT

A significant problem encountered in the resection of large, complex colonic polyps is delayed bleeding. This can occur up to two weeks after the procedure and is a significant source of comorbidity. Untreated it can prove life threatening. It is therefore a priority of modern endoscopy to develop and employ techniques to minimaize this. In this article we will review and discuss the evidence base and controversies in this field, with cold EMR technique, Post-EMR clip closure, and topical haemostatic agents.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Colonoscopy , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Humans , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Time Factors , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology
8.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 167, 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755550

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Serrated polyposis syndrome is the most common polyposis syndrome that has neoplastic potential. However, the natural history, genetic basis, and risk of dysplasia and neoplasia of serrated polyposis syndrome are incompletely understood. The objective of this study is to define the epidemiology of serrated polyposis syndrome. Using this data, we aim to evaluate candidate variables for predicting the risk of dysplasia and neoplasia in sessile serrated lesions found in serrated polyposis syndrome patients. Finally, we aim to use this data to create and evaluate clinical prediction models for accuracy in predicting dysplastic sessile serrated lesions in serrated polyposis syndrome patients. METHODS: This was a regional Australian single-centre retrospective cohort study. Data was prospectively collected data from the clinical record database of a regional Australian gastroenterology practice. All patients undergoing colonoscopy at Port Macquarie Gastroenterology between January 2015 and September 2021 were screened for this study. Collected data included patient demographic, endoscopic, and histopathological findings. Clinical and endoscopic multivariate logistic regression models were created to predict dysplastic sessile serrated lesions. Model performance was examined using the area under the receiver operating curve. RESULTS: In total 8401 patients underwent a colonoscopy procedure during the study period. Serrated polyposis syndrome was diagnosed in 247, representing a prevalence of 2.94% (mean age 67.15 years, 62.75% female). Logistic regression identified; older age at serrated polyposis syndrome diagnosis, a personal history of colorectal cancer, size of the largest sessile serrated lesions removed, and total sessile serrated lesions count as predictors of dysplastic sessile serrated lesions. The clinical and endoscopic model had an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.75. CONCLUSION: Serrated polyposis syndrome is more common than previously described. The clinical and endoscopic variables identified in logistic regression have acceptable accuracy in predicting the risk of dysplasia, however other populations need to be studied to achieve generalisability and improve model performance.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Humans , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Australia/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Logistic Models , Prevalence , Syndrome
9.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 37(2): 328-331, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740492

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: CRC screening is recommended for adults aged 45-75. Mt-sDNA is indicated for asymptomatic individuals between the ages of 45 and 85, but not for those with rectal bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, adenomatous polyps, previous colonoscopy within 10 years, family history of CRC, positive results from CRC screening tests within the past 6 months, or age less than 45 and greater than 85. We aimed to determine the prevalence of mt-sDNA use when not indicated and factors associated with inappropriate testing. METHODS: 7,345 patients underwent mt-sDNA testing and were randomized using EMERSE. Charts for the first 500 patients were reviewed to determine whether mt-sDNA was ordered appropriately according to the USPSTF criteria. Seven patients were excluded due to having more than one inappropriate ordering for mt-sDNA. RESULTS: Of 500 patients, 22.2% had an inappropriately ordered mt-sDNA test. The most common reason for inappropriate ordering was having a previous colonoscopy done within the past 10 years. Rates of inappropriate testing significantly varied by race and the specialty of the ordering provider, with internal medicine providers ordering the most mt-sDNA tests. Rates of inappropriate testing did not significantly vary by sex or type of insurance. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that providers may not be familiar with guidelines for the indicated use of mtsDNA, leading to inappropriate referrals and increased costs. Patients at increased CRC risk would benefit from a more sensitive procedure such as a colonoscopy. Future studies could understand the motivation to order testing outside approved indications through provider surveys and interviews.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Feces/chemistry , Aged, 80 and over , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data
10.
Am J Med Qual ; 39(3): 115-117, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713598

ABSTRACT

This study investigates delays in transitioning from positive noninvasive multitarget stool DNA test results to scheduled diagnostic colonoscopies and identifies strategies aimed at improving patient care. A retrospective review revealed a 53% reduction in the average time from positive multitarget stool DNA test results to ordering colonoscopies postintervention. The findings demonstrate the significance of implementing a new communication system to expedite transitions in health care processes, showcasing its potential to significantly improve efficiency in patient care and health care provider workflows across various clinical testing scenarios. The findings emphasize the transformative impact of this communication system, shedding light on its ability to streamline processes and enhance patient care and staff experience.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Male , Female , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Middle Aged
11.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(4 (Supple-4)): S165-S170, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712427

ABSTRACT

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the last few years has emerged as a valuable tool in managing colorectal cancer, revolutionizing its management at different stages. In early detection and diagnosis, AI leverages its prowess in imaging analysis, scrutinizing CT scans, MRI, and colonoscopy views to identify polyps and tumors. This ability enables timely and accurate diagnoses, initiating treatment at earlier stages. AI has helped in personalized treatment planning because of its ability to integrate diverse patient data, including tumor characteristics, medical history, and genetic information. Integrating AI into clinical decision support systems guarantees evidence-based treatment strategy suggestions in multidisciplinary clinical settings, thus improving patient outcomes. This narrative review explores the multifaceted role of AI, spanning early detection of colorectal cancer, personalized treatment planning, polyp detection, lymph node evaluation, cancer staging, robotic colorectal surgery, and training of colorectal surgeons.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Colonoscopy/methods , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Decision Support Systems, Clinical
12.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10750, 2024 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729988

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention requires early detection and removal of adenomas. We aimed to develop a computational model for real-time detection and classification of colorectal adenoma. Computationally constrained background based on real-time detection, we propose an improved adaptive lightweight ensemble model for real-time detection and classification of adenomas and other polyps. Firstly, we devised an adaptive lightweight network modification and effective training strategy to diminish the computational requirements for real-time detection. Secondly, by integrating the adaptive lightweight YOLOv4 with the single shot multibox detector network, we established the adaptive small object detection ensemble (ASODE) model, which enhances the precision of detecting target polyps without significantly increasing the model's memory footprint. We conducted simulated training using clinical colonoscopy images and videos to validate the method's performance, extracting features from 1148 polyps and employing a confidence threshold of 0.5 to filter out low-confidence sample predictions. Finally, compared to state-of-the-art models, our ASODE model demonstrated superior performance. In the test set, the sensitivity of images and videos reached 87.96% and 92.31%, respectively. Additionally, the ASODE model achieved an accuracy of 92.70% for adenoma detection with a false positive rate of 8.18%. Training results indicate the effectiveness of our method in classifying small polyps. Our model exhibits remarkable performance in real-time detection of colorectal adenomas, serving as a reliable tool for assisting endoscopists.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Artificial Intelligence , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/classification , Adenoma/diagnosis , Adenoma/classification , Colonoscopy/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/classification , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Algorithms
13.
Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi ; 121(5): 389-399, 2024.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735747

ABSTRACT

A 53-year-old man with an abnormal routine physical examination was referred to our hospital. Colonoscopy showed a 5-mm submucosal tumor that was 7cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. It was identified as a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) on biopsy. Preoperatively, we conducted a double balloon endoscopy to examine the entire small intestine. Another 7-mm submucosal tumor was found on the ileocecal valve, which was missed during the first colonoscopy. A final diagnosis of multiple ileal NETs (<10mm in diameter) was made, and the patient underwent ileocecal resection with lymphadenectomy. Histopathological evaluation of the surgical specimen verified the diagnosis of NET Grade 1 with submucosal invasion. Metastasis to lymph node #202 was also detected. He remained relapse-free for 5 years and 5 months after the operation. In conclusion, this was a case of multiple ileal NETs (<10mm in diameter) with lymph node metastasis that could not be detected preoperatively on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. This case highlights the significance of detailed endoscopic observation of the terminal ileum.


Subject(s)
Ileal Neoplasms , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ileal Neoplasms/pathology , Ileal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Ileal Neoplasms/surgery , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopy , Lymph Node Excision , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
14.
J Int Med Res ; 52(5): 3000605241241000, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749910

ABSTRACT

Ileostomy diverts the flow of feces, which can result in malnutrition in the distal part of the intestine. The diversity of the gut microbiota consequently decreases, ultimately leading to intestinal dysbiosis and dysfunction. This condition can readily result in diversion colitis (DC). Potential treatment strategies include interventions targeting the gut microbiota. In this case study, we effectively treated a patient with severe DC by ileostomy and allogeneic fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). A 69-year-old man presented with a perforated malignant tumor in the descending colon and an iliac abscess. He underwent laparoscopic radical sigmoid colon tumor resection and prophylactic ileostomy. Follow-up colonoscopy 3 months postoperatively revealed diffuse intestinal mucosal congestion and edema along with granular inflammatory follicular hyperplasia, leading to a diagnosis of severe DC. After two rounds of allogeneic FMT, both the intestinal mucosal bleeding and edema significantly improved, as did the diversity of the gut microbiota. The positive outcome of allogeneic FMT in this case highlights the potential advantages that this procedure can offer patients with DC. However, few studies have focused on allogeneic FMT, and more in-depth research is needed to gain a better understanding.


Subject(s)
Colitis , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Ileostomy , Humans , Male , Aged , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/methods , Colitis/microbiology , Colitis/therapy , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Treatment Outcome , Colonoscopy
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791767

ABSTRACT

The Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) participated in the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) from 2009 to 2015. We conducted a descriptive evaluation of ANTHC CRCCP demographics, quality measures, and clinical outcomes, including screening methods employed within the program and screening outcomes. There were 6981 program screenings completed, with the majority (81.3%) of people screened in the 50-75 year age group. Colonoscopy was the primary screening test used, accounting for 6704 (96.9%) of the screening tests. Quality of colonoscopy was high: adequate bowel preparation was reported in 98.2% of colonoscopies, cecal intubation rate was 98.9%, and the adenoma detection rate was 38.9%. A high proportion (58.9%) of colonoscopies had an initial finding of polyps or lesions suspicious for cancer; 41.2% of all colonoscopies had histological confirmation of either adenomatous polyps (40.6%) or cancer (0.5%). The ANTHC CRCCP successfully increased CRC screening among American Indian and Alaska Native peoples living in Alaska; this was achieved primarily through high-quality colonoscopy metrics. These data support a continued focus by the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium and its tribal health partners on increasing CRC screening and reducing cancer mortality among Alaska Native peoples.


Subject(s)
Alaska Natives , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Middle Aged , Alaska Natives/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Aged , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Alaska/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Adult
17.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0304374, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787836

ABSTRACT

Colonoscopy-based screening provides protection against colorectal cancer (CRC), but the optimal starting age and time intervals of screening colonoscopies are unknown. We aimed to determine an optimal screening schedule for the US population and its dependencies on the objective of screening (life years gained or incidence, mortality, or cost reduction) and the setting in which screening is performed. We used our established open-source microsimulation model CMOST to calculate optimized colonoscopy schedules with one, two, three or four screening colonoscopies between 20 and 90 years of age. A single screening colonoscopy was most effective in reducing life years lost from CRC when performed at 55 years of age. Two, three and four screening colonoscopy schedules saved a maximum number of life years when performed between 49-64 years; 44-69 years; and 40-72 years; respectively. However, for maximum incidence and mortality reduction, screening colonoscopies needed to be scheduled 4-8 years later in life. The optimum was also influenced by adenoma detection efficiency with lower values for these parameters favoring a later starting age of screening. Low adherence to screening consistently favored a later start and an earlier end of screening. In a personalized approach, optimal screening would start earlier for high-risk patients and later for low-risk individuals. In conclusion, our microsimulation-based approach supports colonoscopy screening schedule between 45 and 75 years of age but the precise timing depends on the objective of screening, as well as assumptions regarding individual CRC risk, efficiency of adenoma detection during colonoscopy and adherence to screening.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Middle Aged , Adenoma/diagnosis , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Adult , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Patient Compliance , Time Factors , Computer Simulation , Mass Screening/methods , Young Adult
18.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 77, 2024 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782770

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The diagnostic accuracy of Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) in the endoscopic surveillance of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been disappointing in most trials which used the Kudo classification. We aim to compare the performance of NBI in the lesion characterization of UC, when applied according to three different classifications (NICE, Kudo, Kudo-IBD). METHODS: In a prospective, real-life study, all visible lesions found during consecutive surveillance colonoscopies with NBI (Exera-II CV-180) for UC were classified as suspected or non-suspected for neoplasia according to the NICE, Kudo and Kudo-IBD criteria. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive (+LR) and negative (-LR) likelihood ratios of the three classifications were calculated, using histology as the reference standard. RESULTS: 394 lesions (mean size 6 mm, range 2-40 mm) from 84 patients were analysed. Twenty-one neoplastic (5%), 49 hyperplastic (12%), and 324 inflammatory (82%) lesions were found. The diagnostic accuracy of the NICE, Kudo and Kudo-IBD classifications were, respectively: SE 76%-71%-86%; SP 55-69%-79% (p < 0.05 Kudo-IBD vs. both Kudo and NICE); +LR 1.69-2.34-4.15 (p < 0.05 Kudo-IBD vs. both Kudo and NICE); -LR 0.43-0.41-0.18. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of NBI in the differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in UC is low if used with conventional classifications of the general population, but it is significantly better with the modified Kudo classification specific for UC.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Colonoscopy , Narrow Band Imaging , Humans , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnostic imaging , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/classification , Narrow Band Imaging/methods , Prospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Colonoscopy/methods , Aged , Population Surveillance
19.
Sci Data ; 11(1): 539, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796533

ABSTRACT

Detection and diagnosis of colon polyps are key to preventing colorectal cancer. Recent evidence suggests that AI-based computer-aided detection (CADe) and computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) systems can enhance endoscopists' performance and boost colonoscopy effectiveness. However, most available public datasets primarily consist of still images or video clips, often at a down-sampled resolution, and do not accurately represent real-world colonoscopy procedures. We introduce the REAL-Colon (Real-world multi-center Endoscopy Annotated video Library) dataset: a compilation of 2.7 M native video frames from sixty full-resolution, real-world colonoscopy recordings across multiple centers. The dataset contains 350k bounding-box annotations, each created under the supervision of expert gastroenterologists. Comprehensive patient clinical data, colonoscopy acquisition information, and polyp histopathological information are also included in each video. With its unprecedented size, quality, and heterogeneity, the REAL-Colon dataset is a unique resource for researchers and developers aiming to advance AI research in colonoscopy. Its openness and transparency facilitate rigorous and reproducible research, fostering the development and benchmarking of more accurate and reliable colonoscopy-related algorithms and models.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Colonoscopy , Colonoscopy/methods , Humans , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Artificial Intelligence , Video Recording , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
20.
Surg Endosc ; 38(6): 3027-3034, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744694

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of salvage endoscopy for residual or recurrence of colorectal tumors after endoscopic resection. METHODS: Multiple databases including PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched to screen for eligible studies and perform data extraction and pooled analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen studies on salvage endoscopy for residual or recurrent colorectal cancer after endoscopic resection were included, covering approximately 994 patients. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that salvage endoscopic therapy for residual or recurrent colorectal tumors following endoscopic resection achieved an en bloc resection rate of 92% (95% CI 0.85-0.97; I2 = 91%) and an R0 resection rate of 82% (95% CI 0.75-0.87; I2 = 78%). The rates of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding and perforation were 10%/1% and 5%/2%, and the recurrence rate was 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage endoscopic resection is an effective and safe treatment strategy for residual or recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic resection.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm, Residual , Salvage Therapy , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Salvage Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Colonoscopy/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...