Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20.395
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10127, 2024 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698075

ABSTRACT

Analyzing blood lipid and bile acid profile changes in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Evaluating the integrated model's diagnostic significance for CRC. Ninety-one individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC group) and 120 healthy volunteers (HC group) were selected for comparison. Serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and apolipoproteins (Apo) A1, ApoA2, ApoB, ApoC2, and ApoC3 were measured using immunoturbidimetric and colorimetric methods. Additionally, LC-MS/MS was employed to detect fifteen bile acids in the serum, along with six tumor markers: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigens (CA) 125, CA19-9, CA242, CA50, and CA72-4. Group comparisons utilized independent sample t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. A binary logistic regression algorithm was applied to fit the indicators and establish a screening model; the diagnostic accuracy of individual Indicators and the model was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The CRC group showed significantly lower levels in eight serum lipid indicators and eleven bile acids compared to the HC group (P < 0.05). Conversely, serum levels of TG, CA19-9, and CEA were elevated (P < 0.05). Among the measured parameters, ApoA2 stands out for its strong correlation with the presence of CRC, showcasing exceptional screening efficacy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.957, a sensitivity of 85.71%, and a specificity of 93.33%. The screening model, integrating ApoA1, ApoA2, lithocholic acid (LCA), and CEA, attained an impressive AUC of 0.995, surpassing the diagnostic accuracy of individual lipids, bile acids, and tumor markers. CRC patients manifest noteworthy alterations in both blood lipids and bile acid profiles. A screening model incorporating ApoA1, ApoA2, LCA, and CEA provides valuable insights for detecting CRC.


Subject(s)
Bile Acids and Salts , Biomarkers, Tumor , Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Bile Acids and Salts/blood , Aged , ROC Curve , Case-Control Studies , Apolipoproteins/blood , Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood , Adult , Lipids/blood
4.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 185, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807062

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer and the second cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Despite the infrastructure and the availability of organized screening programs, participation in their screening programs is less than the set goals. Considering the importance of informing the society about the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer symptoms and the positive impact of mobile health technologies, the present research was conducted with the aim of designing and evaluating a colon cancer mobile application. METHODS: The present research was conducted in two phases: software design and evaluation. In the first phase, the software was prepared using the cascade method. First, all the educational content related to colorectal cancer was collected through an expert panel with the participation of 10 specialists. Then the software was evaluated with alpha and beta testing, and the initial version was approved by users in terms of simplicity and usability. In the second phase, a parallel clinical randomized trial study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effect of a colon cancer mobile application on the early detection of colorectal cancer. In this stage, 204 volunteers participated; inclusion criteria were age 18-85 years, owning a smartphone and the ability to read and write. Participants were randomized into control and intervention groups. The intervention group was educated with the colon cancer application for education about colorectal cancer, and the control group was educated with a pamphlet. After education, both groups were screened for colorectal cancer symptoms, and the results were compared. RESULTS: In the software evaluation phase, the application was used by 204 users. In this stage, 84 (41.2%) women and 120 (58.8%) men, with an average (Standard Deviation) age of 47.53 (13.68) participated. Participants were randomized in two groups, 103 people with an average (Standard Deviation) age of 47.62 (14.65) in intervention group and 101 people with an average (Standard Deviation) age of 47.44 (12.70) in control group. There were no significant differences between the demographic characteristics of age, gender, marriage, occupation, instruction level, digestive disease history, cancer history, cancer risk factors, and family history of cancer between the two groups (P > 0.05). The Mann-Whitney U test indicated that there is a significant difference between the two groups of participants in self-assessment, willingness to do the screening, and the results of the assessment of colorectal cancer (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of the research indicated the positive impact of the Colon Cancer Application on the abilities of the users of self-assessment of colon cancer. Therefore, based on the findings, it can be concluded that the use of the colon cancer mobile application is effective for colon cancer prevention and self-care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir ) on 13/2/2024, with the IRCT ID: IRCT20210131050189N9.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Mobile Applications , Humans , Middle Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Male , Female , Aged , Adult , Software Design , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Young Adult , Adolescent , Patient Education as Topic
5.
J Health Organ Manag ; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796752

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to examine the availability and comprehensiveness of policies pertaining to colorectal cancer (CRC) in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries, as it is a major public health concern in these regions and the second most common cause of cancer deaths among women. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We performed a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology, searching for publicly available policy documents from 18 countries. We described the prevention methods and activities in each country based on the World Health Organization guidelines for CRC screening. FINDINGS: Our research found that most countries had at least five policies related to CRC prevention, which most commonly included primary, secondary and tertiary prevention measures. Elements such as promoting healthy lifestyle choices and implementing screening methods such as fecal occult blood tests, fecal immunochemical tests or colonoscopy were frequently mentioned in these policies. However, target age ranges varied among countries. Our analysis revealed a pressing need to increase the availability and utilization of CRC screening in these countries. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: One of the main limitations of this study is that it is a desk review conducted using internet-based resources, which may have missed important sources or recent policy documents that are not yet available online. Despite our efforts to include all relevant policies, it is possible that we overlooked other policies that contain relevant information, such as those that cover cancer treatment methods. Additionally, our search excluded primary healthcare and universal healthcare coverage policies, which could include important information on CRC prevention and control activities. Additionally, as a scoping review approach was used, no critical assessment of the included studies or literature was conducted. Furthermore, due to the limited number of countries included, the comparability of the findings is limited. In future research, it would be beneficial to expand the study and collect new data from decision-makers and stakeholders to further investigate these hypotheses. It is also important to note that the presence of a policy document is not the end goal, as it is simply a step toward better outcomes. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: In summary, our research highlights the need for improved and unified efforts toward preventing and detecting CRC in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries. This knowledge can be used to focus efforts on developing a standardized policy document and national screening program that can be adapted to meet the unique needs of each country. The importance of CRC screening, regardless of need, must be emphasized in order to aid in the transition from curative to preventive cancer care. Our study highlights the need for more detailed and science-based policies for CRC prevention and screening in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries. While many countries have policies in place, they often lack key components and do not fully reflect current evidence-based guidelines. To improve population health outcomes, further research is needed to understand the implementation and enforcement of these policies as well as their impact on cancer incidence and survival. As the screening landscape evolves, countries may learn from each other and a better understanding of the complex policy frameworks that impact CRC screening is needed so that countries can update and tailor policy documents to their specific situations. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: In conclusion, policymakers in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries have implemented various policy approaches to prevent and control the CRC. The effectiveness of these approaches varies across countries and depends on several factors, including the availability of resources, the level of public awareness and the political will to implement effective policies. Further research is needed to determine the most effective policy approaches for CRC prevention in these regions and to ensure that the right policies are in place to reduce the incidence and impact of this disease. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The study aimed to identify gaps in existing research and areas for future work by mapping, categorizing and organizing existing evidence on CRC policies in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries. Additional research is necessary to understand the implementation and enforcement of these policies and how they impact health outcomes such as cancer incidence and survival. HIGHLIGHTS: CRC policy is heterogeneous in Central and Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus region.There are particularly important differences regarding the implementation of CRC screening.Cancer screening and palliative care approaches were less frequently included.Variations exist in the comprehensiveness of policy by prevention level and country.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Health Policy , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Europe, Eastern , Female
6.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 27(5): 447-451, 2024 May 25.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778683

ABSTRACT

Globally, the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) among individuals younger than 50 is escalating. Compared to late-onset colorectal cancer, EOCRC exhibits distinct clinical, pathological, and molecular features, with a higher prevalence in the left colon and rectum. However, the occurrence and development of EOCRC is a multi-factor and multi-stage evolution process, which is the result of the mutual effect of environmental, genetic and biological factors, and involves the multi-level regulation mechanism of other organisms. With the development and improvement of high-throughput sequencing technology, the application of multi-omics analysis has become an important development direction to resolve the pathogenesis of complex diseases and individualized treatment plans. This article aims to review the research progress of EOCRC at the multi-omics level, providing a theoretical foundation for earlier diagnosis and more precise treatment of this diseases.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Genomics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Proteomics/methods , Age of Onset , Metabolomics , Multiomics
7.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 27(5): 457-463, 2024 May 25.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778685

ABSTRACT

Objective: To explore the differences in distribution of colorectal cancer-related risk factors between patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) and those with late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) in a Chinese cohort, and to provide reference and guidance for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of EOCRC. Methods: Using data from the National Colorectal Cancer Cohort study cohort, 5377 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) attending the Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from June 2018 to February 2023 were included in the study cohort. Questionnaires capturing epidemiological features, including lifestyle and dietary habits, were administered. The patients were divided into two groups, the cut-off age being 50 years. Those aged ≥50 years were defined as having LOCRC and those aged <50 years as having EOCRC. Wilcoxon (continuous variates) or χ2 tests (categorical variates) were performed to compare differences in epidemiological features. Results: A total of 3799 people who had completed the questionnaire were included in this study, 491 of whom had EOCRC and 3308 LOCRC. The response rate to the questionnaire was 70.7%. The median ages of patients in the EOCRC and LOCRC groups were 43 and 66 years, respectively. There was a higher proportion of female patients (48.5% [253/491] vs. 35.8% [1184/3308], χ2=28.8, P<0.001) in the EOCRC than the LOCRC group. Patients with EOCRC and lower body mass index (medium 22.1 kg/m2 vs. 22.9 kg/m2, W=744 793, P=0.005) and lower proportion of abdominal obesity (87.2% [428/491] vs. 93.8% [3103/3308], χ2=38.3, P<0.001). Patients with EORC significantly less commonly reported a history of hypertension (5.9% [29/491] vs. 41.6% [1375/3308], χ2=231.8, P<0.001), diabetes (1.4% [7/491] vs. 14.4% [476/3308], χ2=63.6, P<0.001) and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (0.8% [4/491] vs. 7.3% [241/3308], χ2=28.6, P<0.001). However, the proportion of patients with a family history of CRC was significantly higher (P<0.05) in the EOCRC group (10.2% [50/491] vs. 6.9% [227/3 308], χ2=6.5, P=0.010]. In terms of lifestyle, patients with EOCRC had shorter sleep duration (median: 8.0 hours vs. 8.5 hours, W=578 989, P<0.001), and were less likely to participate in physical exercise (29.5% [145/491] vs. 38.7% [1281/3308] χ2=15.0, P<0.001) or engage in physical work (65.2% [320/491] vs. 74.1% [2450/3308], χ2=16.7, P<0.001). Meanwhile, in the EOCRC group a lower percentage of patients were smokers (29.3% [144/491] vs. 42.7% [1411/3308], χ2=46.9,P<0.001) and they smoked less (median 17.6 pack/year vs. 30.0 pack/year,W=55 850,P<0.001). Fewer patients in the EOCRC group habitually drank alcohol (21.0% [103/491] vs. 38.0% [1257/3308], χ2=57.5, P<0.001) or tea (17.5% [86/491] vs. 28.7% [948/3308], χ2=26.2, P<0.001) than in the LOCRC group. Compared with the LOCRC group, patients with EOCRC had a higher frequency of intake of fresh meat, fresh fruit, eggs, and dairy products and a lower frequency of intake of preserved meat and pickled vegetables; these differences are statistically significant (all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in consumption of fresh vegetables or a high-sugar diet between the two groups (both P>0.05). Conclusions: This study highlights disparities in adverse lifestyle and dietary habits between patients in China with EOCRC versus LOCRC.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , China/epidemiology , Aged , Age of Onset , Risk Factors , Life Style , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Feeding Behavior
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11633, 2024 05 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773186

ABSTRACT

This retrospective cohort study aimed to identify baseline patient characteristics involving modifiable lifestyle factors that are associated with the development of colorectal adenomas, and establish and validate a nomogram for risk predictions among high-risk populations with negative index colonoscopy. A total of 83,076 participants who underwent an index colonoscopy at the Tianjin Union Medical Center between 2004 and 2019 were collected. According to meticulous inclusion and exclusion criteria, 249 subjects were enrolled and categorized into the primary and validation cohorts. Based on the primary cohort, we utilized the LASSO-Cox regression and the univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) regression parallelly to select variables, and incorporated selected variables into two nomogram models established using the multivariate Cox-PH regression. Comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the two models demonstrated that the nomogram model constituted by four covariates retained by the LASSO-Cox regression, including baseline age, body mass index, physical activity and family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) in first-degree relatives, performed better at predicting adenoma-free survival probabilities. Further validation including the concordance index, calibration plots, decision curve analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves also revealed good predictive accuracy, discriminating ability, clinical utility and risk stratification capacity of the nomogram model. Our nomogram will assist high-risk individuals with negative index colonoscopy to prevent colorectal adenoma occurrence and CRC morbidity with improved cost-effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Life Style , Nomograms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adenoma/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Risk Factors , Adult , Proportional Hazards Models , ROC Curve
10.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 27(5): 441-446, 2024 May 25.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778682

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the incidence rate of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) continues to rise, but its pathogenesis is still unclear. EOCRC is different from late-onset colorectal cancer in terms of the clinical and molecular pathological features, but their treatment strategies are the same, due to a lack of specific guidelines of screening, diagnosis and treatment for EOCRC. This article summarizes the research progress of epidemiological characteristics, risk factors, clinical features, molecular pathological features, pathogenesis, and prevention and screening strategies for EOCRC, in order to provide theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of patients with EOCRC.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Risk Factors , Age of Onset , Early Detection of Cancer , Incidence
11.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 27(5): 430-435, 2024 May 25.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778680

ABSTRACT

The incidence and mortality rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) among people under 50 years old are showing an upward trend. Although traditional epidemiological studies have conducted relatively deep research and screened out environmental factors related to EOCRC, our understanding of the causes, mechanisms, and treatment of this disease is still far from sufficient. In this review, we clarify the current progress of EOCRC, with a particular focus on epidemiology, screening status, clinical symptoms, and prognosis. This provides new evidence for secondary prevention, including precision screening, and offers new ideas for improving the diagnosis and treatment of EOCRC.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prognosis , Age of Onset , Incidence , Mass Screening/methods , Early Detection of Cancer , Risk Factors
12.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 623, 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778252

ABSTRACT

We provided an overview which evaluated the diagnostic performance of circulation EV biomarkers for CRC from PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science until 21 August 2022.Weidentified 48 studies that involved 7727 participants and evaluated 162 plasma/serum individual EV biomarkers including 117 RNAs and 45 proteins, as well as 45 EV biomarker panels for CRC detection. 12 studies evaluated the diagnostic performance of EV biomarkers for early CRC. The summarized sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value of individual EV RNAs and EV RNA panels were 76%, 75%, 0.87 and 82%, 79% and 0.90, respectively. Meanwhile, those of individual EV proteins and EV protein panels were 85%, 84%, 0.92 and 87%, 83%, 0.92, respectively. These results indicated that EV biomarker panels revealed superior diagnostic performance than the corresponding individual biomarkers. In early CRC, EV biomarkers showed available diagnostic value with the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value of 80%, 75%, and 0.89.In subgroup analyses, EV miRNAs and LncRNAs held similar diagnostic value with the sensitivity, specificity and AUC value of 75%, 78%, 0.90 and 79%, 72%, 0.83, which was highly consistent with the whole EV RNAs. Significantly, the diagnostic values of EV miRNAs in plasma were marginally higher than those based on serum. In detail, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were 79%, 81%, and 0.92 in plasma, as well as 74%, 77%, and 0.88 in serum, respectively. Therefore, circulation EV biomarkers could be considered as a promising biomarker for the early detection of CRC.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Colorectal Neoplasms , Extracellular Vesicles , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , MicroRNAs/blood , Sensitivity and Specificity , RNA, Long Noncoding/blood
13.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 167, 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755550

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Serrated polyposis syndrome is the most common polyposis syndrome that has neoplastic potential. However, the natural history, genetic basis, and risk of dysplasia and neoplasia of serrated polyposis syndrome are incompletely understood. The objective of this study is to define the epidemiology of serrated polyposis syndrome. Using this data, we aim to evaluate candidate variables for predicting the risk of dysplasia and neoplasia in sessile serrated lesions found in serrated polyposis syndrome patients. Finally, we aim to use this data to create and evaluate clinical prediction models for accuracy in predicting dysplastic sessile serrated lesions in serrated polyposis syndrome patients. METHODS: This was a regional Australian single-centre retrospective cohort study. Data was prospectively collected data from the clinical record database of a regional Australian gastroenterology practice. All patients undergoing colonoscopy at Port Macquarie Gastroenterology between January 2015 and September 2021 were screened for this study. Collected data included patient demographic, endoscopic, and histopathological findings. Clinical and endoscopic multivariate logistic regression models were created to predict dysplastic sessile serrated lesions. Model performance was examined using the area under the receiver operating curve. RESULTS: In total 8401 patients underwent a colonoscopy procedure during the study period. Serrated polyposis syndrome was diagnosed in 247, representing a prevalence of 2.94% (mean age 67.15 years, 62.75% female). Logistic regression identified; older age at serrated polyposis syndrome diagnosis, a personal history of colorectal cancer, size of the largest sessile serrated lesions removed, and total sessile serrated lesions count as predictors of dysplastic sessile serrated lesions. The clinical and endoscopic model had an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.75. CONCLUSION: Serrated polyposis syndrome is more common than previously described. The clinical and endoscopic variables identified in logistic regression have acceptable accuracy in predicting the risk of dysplasia, however other populations need to be studied to achieve generalisability and improve model performance.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Humans , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Australia/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Logistic Models , Prevalence , Syndrome
14.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 37(2): 328-331, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740492

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: CRC screening is recommended for adults aged 45-75. Mt-sDNA is indicated for asymptomatic individuals between the ages of 45 and 85, but not for those with rectal bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, adenomatous polyps, previous colonoscopy within 10 years, family history of CRC, positive results from CRC screening tests within the past 6 months, or age less than 45 and greater than 85. We aimed to determine the prevalence of mt-sDNA use when not indicated and factors associated with inappropriate testing. METHODS: 7,345 patients underwent mt-sDNA testing and were randomized using EMERSE. Charts for the first 500 patients were reviewed to determine whether mt-sDNA was ordered appropriately according to the USPSTF criteria. Seven patients were excluded due to having more than one inappropriate ordering for mt-sDNA. RESULTS: Of 500 patients, 22.2% had an inappropriately ordered mt-sDNA test. The most common reason for inappropriate ordering was having a previous colonoscopy done within the past 10 years. Rates of inappropriate testing significantly varied by race and the specialty of the ordering provider, with internal medicine providers ordering the most mt-sDNA tests. Rates of inappropriate testing did not significantly vary by sex or type of insurance. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that providers may not be familiar with guidelines for the indicated use of mtsDNA, leading to inappropriate referrals and increased costs. Patients at increased CRC risk would benefit from a more sensitive procedure such as a colonoscopy. Future studies could understand the motivation to order testing outside approved indications through provider surveys and interviews.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Feces/chemistry , Aged, 80 and over , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data
15.
J Med Life ; 17(1): 4-14, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38737656

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent types of cancer, with high incidence rates and mortality globally. The extended timeframe for developing CRC allows for the potential screening and early identification of the disease. Furthermore, studies have shown that survival rates for patients with cancer are increased when diagnoses are made at earlier stages. Recent research suggests that the development of CRC, including its precancerous lesion, is influenced not only by genetic factors but also by epigenetic variables. Studies suggest epigenetics plays a significant role in cancer development, particularly CRC. While this approach is still in its early stages and faces challenges due to the variability of CRC, it shows promise as a potential method for understanding and addressing the disease. This review examined the current evidence supporting genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for screening and diagnosis. In addition, we also discussed the feasibility of translating these methodologies into clinical settings. Several markers show promising potential, including the methylation of vimentin (VIM), syndecan-2 (SDC2), and septin 9 (SEPT9). However, their application as screening and diagnostic tools, particularly for early-stage CRC, has not been fully optimized, and their effectiveness needs validation in large, multi-center patient populations. Extensive trials and further investigation are required to translate genetic and epigenetic biomarkers into practical clinical use. biomarkers, diagnostic biomarkers.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Epigenesis, Genetic , Septins , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Septins/genetics , DNA Methylation/genetics , Syndecan-2/genetics , Vimentin/genetics
16.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(4 (Supple-4)): S165-S170, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712427

ABSTRACT

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the last few years has emerged as a valuable tool in managing colorectal cancer, revolutionizing its management at different stages. In early detection and diagnosis, AI leverages its prowess in imaging analysis, scrutinizing CT scans, MRI, and colonoscopy views to identify polyps and tumors. This ability enables timely and accurate diagnoses, initiating treatment at earlier stages. AI has helped in personalized treatment planning because of its ability to integrate diverse patient data, including tumor characteristics, medical history, and genetic information. Integrating AI into clinical decision support systems guarantees evidence-based treatment strategy suggestions in multidisciplinary clinical settings, thus improving patient outcomes. This narrative review explores the multifaceted role of AI, spanning early detection of colorectal cancer, personalized treatment planning, polyp detection, lymph node evaluation, cancer staging, robotic colorectal surgery, and training of colorectal surgeons.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Colonoscopy/methods , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Decision Support Systems, Clinical
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10750, 2024 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729988

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention requires early detection and removal of adenomas. We aimed to develop a computational model for real-time detection and classification of colorectal adenoma. Computationally constrained background based on real-time detection, we propose an improved adaptive lightweight ensemble model for real-time detection and classification of adenomas and other polyps. Firstly, we devised an adaptive lightweight network modification and effective training strategy to diminish the computational requirements for real-time detection. Secondly, by integrating the adaptive lightweight YOLOv4 with the single shot multibox detector network, we established the adaptive small object detection ensemble (ASODE) model, which enhances the precision of detecting target polyps without significantly increasing the model's memory footprint. We conducted simulated training using clinical colonoscopy images and videos to validate the method's performance, extracting features from 1148 polyps and employing a confidence threshold of 0.5 to filter out low-confidence sample predictions. Finally, compared to state-of-the-art models, our ASODE model demonstrated superior performance. In the test set, the sensitivity of images and videos reached 87.96% and 92.31%, respectively. Additionally, the ASODE model achieved an accuracy of 92.70% for adenoma detection with a false positive rate of 8.18%. Training results indicate the effectiveness of our method in classifying small polyps. Our model exhibits remarkable performance in real-time detection of colorectal adenomas, serving as a reliable tool for assisting endoscopists.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Artificial Intelligence , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/classification , Adenoma/diagnosis , Adenoma/classification , Colonoscopy/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/classification , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Algorithms
18.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(9)2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732222

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common neoplasms in developed countries, with increasing incidence and mortality, even in young people. A variety of serum markers have been associated with CRC (CEA, CA 19-9), but neither should be used as a screening tool for the diagnosis or evolution staging of CRC. The sensitivity and specificity of these markers are not as good as is required, so new ones need to be found. Matrix Gla protein and PIVKA II are involved in carcinogenesis, but few studies have evaluated their usefulness in predicting the presence and severity of CRC. Two hundred patients were divided into three groups: 80 patients were included in the control group; 80 with CRC and without hepatic metastasis were included in Group 1; 40 patients with CRC and hepatic metastasis were included in Group 2. Vitamin K-dependent proteins (VKDPs) levels in plasma were determined. Patients with CRC without methastasis (Group 1) and CRC patients with methastasis (Group 2) presented significantly higher values of CEA, CA 19-9, PIVKA II (310.05 ± 38.22 vs. 430.13 ± 122.13 vs. 20.23 ± 10.90), and ucMGP (14,300.00 ± 2387.02 vs. 13,410.52 ± 2243.16 vs. 1780.31 ± 864.70) compared to control group (Group 0). Interestingly, Group 1 presented the greatest PIVKA II values. Out of all the markers, significant differences between the histological subgroups were found only for ucMGP, but only in non-metastatic CRC. Studying the discrimination capacity between the patients with CRC vs. those without, no significant differences were found between the classical tumor markers and the VKDP AUROC curves (PIVKA II and ucMGP AUROCs = 1). For the metastatic stage, the sensitivity and specificity of the VKDPs were lower in comparison with those of CA 19-9 and CEA, respectively (PIVKA II AUROC = 0.789, ucMGP AUROC = 0.608). The serum levels of these VKDPs are significantly altered in patients with colorectal carcinoma; it is possible to find additional value of these in the early stages of the disease.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Calcium-Binding Proteins , Colorectal Neoplasms , Matrix Gla Protein , Prothrombin , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Female , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Middle Aged , Prothrombin/metabolism , Calcium-Binding Proteins/blood , Aged , Extracellular Matrix Proteins/blood , Protein Precursors/blood , Adult , Liver Neoplasms/blood , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Vitamin K/blood , ROC Curve , CA-19-9 Antigen/blood , Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood , Biomarkers
19.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 21: E30, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696253

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Mailed stool testing for colorectal cancer (CRC) may improve screening uptake and reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC, especially among patients at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). To expand screening programs it is important to identify cost-effective approaches. Methods: We developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the cost, effects on screening and patient outcomes (CRCs detected, CRCs prevented, CRC deaths prevented), and cost-effectiveness of implementing a state-wide mailed stool testing program over 5 years among unscreened, age-eligible (aged 50-75 y) patients at FQHCs in Texas. We compared various outreach strategies and organizational structures (centralized, regional, or a hybrid). We used data from our existing regional mailed stool testing program and recent systematic reviews to set parameters for the model. Costs included start-up and ongoing activities and were estimated in 2022 US dollars from the perspective of a hypothetical third-party payer. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by using both incremental and average cost-effectiveness ratios. Results: Using either a statewide centralized or hybrid organizational configuration to mail stool tests to newly eligible FQHC patients and patients who have responded at least once since program inception is likely to result in the best use of resources over 5 years, enabling more than 110,000 additional screens, detecting an incremental 181 to 194 CRCs, preventing 91 to 98 CRCs, and averting 46 to 50 CRC deaths, at a cost of $10 million to $11 million compared with no program. Conclusions: A statewide mailed stool testing program for FQHC patients can be implemented at reasonable cost with considerable effects on CRC screening outcomes, especially when its structure maximizes program efficiency while maintaining effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Texas , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Male , Postal Service , Occult Blood , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods
20.
Am J Mens Health ; 18(3): 15579883241249642, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721788

ABSTRACT

African American/Black (henceforth Black) men face disproportionate risks of morbidity and mortality from both cardiovascular disease (CVD) and colorectal cancer (CRC). The American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 (LS7) tool was designed to examine predictors of CVD with included behaviors also linked to CRC risk (i.e., smoking status, weight, diet, and physical activity). However, no studies have combined LS7 assessment alongside CRC screening history, which serves as a proxy for assessing CRC risk, in Black men. In this study, Black men aged 45-75 participating in annual community wellness events were screened for 6 of 7 LS7 measures (excluding diet, LS6) and self-reported CRC screening. Analyses conducted using R 4.0.5. revealed that Black men (N = 680), with an average age of 57.3 years (SD = 7.5), reported poor (39.7%), intermediate (34.6%), or ideal (25.7%) LS6 scores with higher scores corresponding to lower risk for CVD. However, for every 1-point increase in LS6 scores (0-6), there was a 26% lower odds of reported CRC screening (p = .001). In the fully adjusted model, men with 4+ ideal LS6 behaviors had a 60% lower odds of self-reported CRC screening compared to those with two ideal LS6 behaviors (p < .001). These findings underscore the need for culturally relevant interventions for Black men across all levels of cardiovascular health (CVH) to increase CRC screening uptake.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Cardiovascular Diseases , Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , United States , Mass Screening
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...