Prevention of dental disease versus surgical treatment.

The members of the Minnesota legislature have debated methods by which access to dental care and treatment of dental disease can be improved at a cost lower than that of present delivery systems. This review sheds light on some significant aspects of what the dental profession has learned over the last century that has proven significantly beneficial to the overall health of the American populace. Recommendations are made in the use of cost-effective dental public health interventions that could be used to provide better access and improved dental health at lower cost.

Shaking up the dental safety-net: elimination of optional adult dental Medicaid benefits in California.

In July 2009, California eliminated funding for most adult non-emergency Medicaid dental benefits (Denti-Cal). This paper presents the findings from a qualitative assessment of the impacts of the Denti-Cal cuts on California's oral health safety-net. Interviews were conducted with dental safety-net providers throughout the state, including public health departments, community health centers, dental schools, Native American health clinics, and private providers, and were coded thematically using Atlas.ti. Safety-net providers reported decreased utilization by Denti-Cal-eligible adults, who now primarily seek emergency dental services, and reported shifting to focus on pediatric and privately-insured patients. Significant changes were reported in safety-net clinic finances, operations, and ability to refer. The impact of the Denti-Cal cuts has been distributed unevenly across the safety-net, with private providers and County Health Departments bearing the highest burden.

Access to dental care and the capacity of the California dental care system.

The authors estimated the following levels of technical efficiency for three types of dental practices in California where technical efficiency is defined as the maximum output that can be produced from a given set of inputs: generalists (including pediatric dentists), 96.5 percent; specialists, 77.1 percent; community dental clinics, 83.6 percent. Combining this with information on access, it is estimated that the California dental care system in 2009-10 could serve approximately 74 percent of the population.

Advanced dental education programs: status and implications for access to care in California.

Primary care residencies in dentistry include general practice residency and advanced education in general dentistry--collectively known as postdoctoral general--dentistry and pediatric dentistry. These primary care programs are the most likely to serve underserved populations during the training experience. An expansion of primary care dental residency positions in California has the potential to positively impact access to care in California. However, there are significant political and financial barriers to realizing this potential.

Community-based dental education: history, current status, and future.

This article examines the history, current status, and future direction of community-based dental education (CBDE). The key issues addressed include the reasons that dentistry developed a different clinical education model than the other health professions; how government programs, private medical foundations, and early adopter schools influenced the development of CBDE; the societal and financial factors that are leading more schools to increase the time that senior dental students spend in community programs; the impact of CBDE on school finances and faculty and student perceptions; and the reasons that CBDE is likely to become a core part of the clinical education of all dental graduates.

Cost-effectiveness models for dental caries prevention programmes among Chilean schoolchildren.

AIM: This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective of seven dental caries prevention programmes among schoolchildren in Chile: three community-based programmes: water-fluoridation, salt-fluoridation and dental sealants; and four school-based programmes: milk-fluoridation; fluoridated mouthrinses (FMR); APF-Gel, and supervised toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste. METHODS: Standard cost-effectiveness analysis methods were used. The costs associated with implementing and operating each programme, using a societal perspective, were identified and estimated. The comparator was non-intervention. Health outcomes were measured as dental caries averted over a 6-year period. Costs were estimated as direct treatment costs, programmes costs and costs of productivity losses as a result of each dental caries prevention programme. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for each programme. Sensitivity analyses were conducted over key parameters. RESULTS: Primary cost-effectiveness analysis (discounted) indicated that four programmes showed net social savings by the DMFT averted. These savings encompassed a range of values per diseased tooth averted; US$16.21 (salt-fluoridation), US$14.89 (community water fluoridation); US$14.78 (milk fluoridation); and US$8.63 (FMR). Individual programmes using an APF-Gel application, dental sealants, and supervised tooth brushing using fluoridated toothpaste, represent costs for the society per diseased tooth averted of US$21.30, US$11.56 and US$8.55, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on cost required to prevent one carious tooth among schoolchildren, salt fluoridation was the most cost-effective, with APF-Gel ranking as least cost-effective. Findings confirm that most community/school-based dental caries interventions are cost-effective uses of society's financial resources. The models used are conservative and likely to underestimate the real benefits of each intervention.

Community-based dental education at Boston University.

Community-based dental education has been integral to the Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine's mission for the past thirty years. This report describes the programs, their history, and their outcomes. The three main educational experiences outside the school are the applied professional experience clerkship, the pediatric dentistry rotation, and the extramural training program. By all student and community outcomes measured, such as students' self-confidence, patient management skills, clinical technical skills, and increase in community members' access to care, these programs are a success.

Dental school and community clinic financial arrangements.

In community-based dental education programs, student-provided services can be an important source of community clinic and practice revenues. The University of Michigan School of Dentistry has developed a revenue-sharing arrangement with multiple community clinics and practices. During their ten-week externship, senior students produce at least $800 a day in patient care revenues, and the school receives an average of $165 per student per day from community sites. These funds are used to cover program costs and enrich the curriculum. Revenue-sharing with community clinics and practices helps to ensure program longevity and is an increasingly significant source of school revenues.

Community-based dental education and community clinic finances.

To develop a long-term, sustainable partnership with dental schools, federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) need to assess the financial impact of dental students on their financial operations. Primary concerns are that students will not cover their marginal costs and will reduce the productivity of clinic dentists. This study uses data from Asian Health Services, an FQHC in Oakland, California, to examine revenues generated by senior dental students and by FQHC dentists when students are and are not present. The analysis of ten months of electronic record data showed that two full-time equivalent students generated $420,549 in gross revenues and reduced dentist output by only $29,000. While the results are from just one FQHC, they strongly suggest that students make a significant contribution to clinic productivity and finances.

Policy implications of assessing the impact of community-based education on dental school finances.

Dental schools are hard pressed to find the resources to adequately fund their mission of education, research, and service. Over the years, schools have tried to make up for the loss in public funds by increasing student tuition, increasing enrollment, and reducing the growth in faculty and staff salaries and program costs. Unfortunately, these strategies have not solved the financial problems. Declining resources are threatening the future of dental education. Data presented in this report attempt to answer the following question: will community-based dental education restore the fiscal health of dental schools and provide students an equal or better education? By reducing the number of chairs per student and developing revenue-sharing relationships with community clinics, community-based dental education offers a realistic option for putting dental schools on a solid financial footing.

BDA special care case mix model.

Routine dental care provided in special care dentistry is complicated by patient specific factors which increase the time taken and costs of treatment. The BDA have developed and conducted a field trial of a case mix tool to measure this complexity. For each episode of care the case mix tool assesses the following on a four point scale: 'ability to communicate', 'ability to cooperate', 'medical status', 'oral risk factors', 'access to oral care' and 'legal and ethical barriers to care'. The tool is reported to be easy to use and captures sufficient detail to discriminate between types of service and special care dentistry provided. It offers potential as a simple to use and clinically relevant source of performance management and commissioning data. This paper describes the model, demonstrates how it is currently being used, and considers future developments in its use.

Cross-border dental care: 'dental tourism' and patient mobility.

Patient mobility is increasing. 'Dental tourism' is driven by numerous factors. These factors include the high cost of local care, delays in obtaining access to local dentists, competent care at many international clinics, inexpensive air travel, and the Internet's capacity to link 'customers' to 'sellers' of health-related services. Though dental tourism will benefit some patients, increased patient mobility comes with numerous risks. Lack of access to affordable and timely local care plays a significant role in prompting patients to cross borders and receive dental care outside their local communities.

Community dental service--four years on.

In July 2000, the first group of graduates entered compulsory community dental service. The aim of this study was to document the experiences of the community dentists four years on. A cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out among 232 community dentists. A structured questionnaire divided into nine sections: demography, the allocation process, accommodation & living conditions, dental clinic facilities - equipment and materials, work environment, income, sense of achievement, intellectual fulfillment. Forty five per cent of the sample (n = 105) responded, 51% were male and the mean age of the sample was 24.8 years. Of the responadents 47% could speak the local language; nearly a quarter (24%) felt that the allocation process was not handled efficiently and 30% said that they needed more information about their placement posting. Sixty per cent were placed within 20km of the nearest town; 11% did not have access to telephone or fax and 47% were provided with accommodation. Thirty five per cent described the condition of the clinics operating as poor. A fifth of the respondents (21%) indicated that they did not have full sets of instruments. Eight per cent did not have an autoclave and 7% a high-speed hand piece. Fifty one per cent did not have oxygen and nearly two thirds (58%) of the clinics did not have any emergency equipment. Seventy one per cent reported that the equipment broke down often and 65% that it was not fixed promptly. Nearly all (90%) indicated that they would welcome a short course that might assist them to repair broken down equipment. Eighty five per cent reported that they enjoyed their work environment. Seventy per cent had no supervision, but more than a third felt confident enough to work without it. Although 80% felt that their professional competence had improved, an equal number indicated that they have lost some of their clinical competence in one or other area. Despite the fact that 65% reported that there were many opportunities to improve their clinical skills, more than half felt that they were over-skilled for the job. Eighty per cent of the respondents indicated the year was fulfilling and worthwhile. Problem areas centred on the adequacy of the information provided prior to allocation, high cost of accommodation, break down of equipment and lack of basic restorative materials. It is gratifying to note that there have been many improvements since the initial intake of community dentists in 2000, but there remains a few areas that still need to be addressed.

Bridging the gap: a dental access initiative for Northland children.

This paper describes a dental access initiative in Northland, New Zealand, to investigate the feasibility and benefits of engaging a mobile community dentist to accept referrals of children who required treatment beyond the scope of practice of dental therapists. The pilot programme aimed to provide equitable and timely access to the services of a publicly funded dentist, for children living in the more economically-deprived and rural areas of Northland.

Community orthodontists and craniofacial care: results of a Washington state survey.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about community orthodontists' previous training in, experience with, or receptivity to caring for children with craniofacial disorders. OBJECTIVES: (1) To characterize the current level of participation by Washington state orthodontists in craniofacial care; and (2) to identify factors that promote or impede community orthodontists' involvement in caring for children with craniofacial conditions. DESIGN: Mail survey. METHODS: A 26-item questionnaire was designed and mailed to all active orthodontists in Washington state (N = 230). Question topics included practice characteristics, training and experience with craniofacial conditions, concerns related to public and private insurance, and communication with craniofacial teams. RESULTS: Of eligible respondents, 68% completed the survey. Most orthodontists' patient panels were made up of patients who either have private insurance or pay cash for services. On average, 2% of respondents' patients were Medicaid beneficiaries. Only 20% of respondents had seen more than three patients with cleft lip and/or palate in the past 3 years. Although a minority of orthodontists receive referrals from (27%) or are affiliated with (11%) craniofacial teams, most orthodontists perceived craniofacial care positively and were interested to learn more about craniofacial care and to accept additional patients with these conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this survey can inform potential strategies to increase access to orthodontic care for children with craniofacial disorders. These would include developing an organized training, referral, and communication system between community orthodontists and state craniofacial teams and considering a case-management approach to facilitate this process.