Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rev. esp. cir. ortop. traumatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 62(5): 318-321, sept.-oct. 2018.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-177651

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Analizar los pedidos solicitados a un banco musculoesquelético y evaluar el porcentaje de utilización de los tejidos. Material y métodos: Se analizaron 265 pedidos de tejido osteomuscular en el transcurso de un año. Exclusiones: 5 duplicaciones y 5 pedidos en los cuales no hubo disponibilidad para cubrir la necesidad. Se analizó la cantidad de cirugías en las que finalmente se utilizó el injerto. Resultados: De 255 pedidos solicitados, en 178 (70%) el injerto fue utilizado, mientras que en 77 (30%) el injerto no fue utilizado. De los 178 utilizados, en 23 (10%) hubo una devolución parcial. De los 77 pedidos de injerto no utilizado, en 32 (13%) la cirugía fue realizada sin necesidad de utilizar tejido de banco, mientras que en los 45 (17%) restantes la cirugía fue suspendida. Discusión: Un 30% de los injertos solicitados no fueron utilizados; un 17% debido a que la cirugía fue suspendida y un 13% porque el tejido fue devuelto, ya que la cirugía no lo requirió. En otro 10% hubo una devolución parcial del tejido. Con base en este análisis, consideramos que es importante tener una confirmación directa de la realización de la cirugía para evitar enviar tejido a cirugías suspendidas, ya que además del impacto económico, el banco debe asegurar un adecuado mantenimiento de la temperatura durante el transporte y almacenamiento en el centro trasplantológico, para evitar el descarte de dicho tejido, en caso de ser devuelto


Objective: To analyze orders requested from a musculoskeletal tissue bank and to evaluate the percentage of tissue implantation. Material and methods: Two hundred and sixty-five orders for musculoskeletal tissue were analyzed over the course of a year. Exclusions: 5 duplications and 5 orders for which there was no availability to cover the need. We analyzed the number of surgeries in which the graft was finally used. Results: Of a total of 255 orders, the graft was used in 178 (70%), and the graft was not used in 77 (30%). Of the 178 used, there was a partial refund in 23 (10%). Of the 77 orders not used, surgery was performed in 32 (13%) without the use of bank tissue, while surgery was discontinued in the remaining 45 (17%). Discussion: A non-utilization rate of 30% was identified, of which 17% was from surgery that was not performed and 13% from surgery that was performed, but the tissue was returned to the tissue bank, because it was not required. In a further 10% there was partial return of the tissue. Based on this analysis, we consider that it is important to have direct confirmation of the surgery to avoid sending tissue for discontinued surgeries, since in addition to the economic impact, the bank must ensure adequate temperature maintenance during transportation and storage in the transplantation centre, to avoid discarding said tissue if it is returned


Subject(s)
Humans , Bone Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Muscles/transplantation , Surgical Flaps/statistics & numerical data , Composite Tissue Allografts/standards , Tissue Banks/supply & distribution , Tissue Preservation/standards , Tissue Survival
2.
Transplantation ; 101(6): 1200-1205, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27391200

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For men with significant genitourinary injury, penile transplantation is being considered as an option when reconstruction is not feasible or proves unacceptable to the injured patient. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted to assess the current state of penile reconstruction and transplantation options, as well as to evaluate scholarly research addressing the ethical dimensions of penile transplantation. RESULTS: The state of penile transplantation is elementary. If reconstruction is not a possibility, proceeding ethically with research on penile vascularized composite allotransplantation will require the articulation of guidelines. To date, very little has been published in the scholarly literature assessing the ethics of penile transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines should be developed to address penile transplantation and must cover the donation of tissue, consent, subject selection, qualifications of the surgical team, and management of both failure and patient dissatisfaction. Unless guidelines are established and disseminated, penile transplants should not be undertaken. The preliminary recommendations suggested in this article may help to inform development of guidelines.


Subject(s)
Composite Tissue Allografts/transplantation , Penile Transplantation , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/ethics , Clinical Decision-Making/ethics , Composite Tissue Allografts/standards , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Selection/ethics , Penis/blood supply , Penis/injuries , Penis/innervation , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics , Transplant Recipients/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/methods , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/psychology , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...