Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25.741
Filter
1.
BJS Open ; 8(1)2024 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38949628

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcomes are composite outcome measures that reflect the ideal overall experience for patients. There are many of these in the elective surgery literature but no textbook outcomes have been proposed for patients following emergency laparotomy. The aim was to achieve international consensus amongst experts and patients for the best Textbook Outcomes for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. METHODS: A modified Delphi exercise was undertaken with three planned rounds to achieve consensus regarding the best Textbook Outcomes based on the category, number and importance (Likert scale of 1-5) of individual outcome measures. There were separate questions for non-trauma and trauma. A patient engagement exercise was undertaken after round 2 to inform the final round. RESULTS: A total of 337 participants from 53 countries participated in all three rounds of the exercise. The final Textbook Outcomes were divided into 'early' and 'longer-term'. For non-trauma patients the proposed early Textbook Outcome was 'Discharged from hospital without serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation or death). For trauma patients it was 'Discharged from hospital without unexpected transfusion after haemostasis, and no serious postoperative complications (adapted Clavien-Dindo for trauma ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation on or death)'. The longer-term Textbook Outcome for both non-trauma and trauma was 'Achieved the early Textbook Outcome, and restoration of baseline quality of life at 1 year'. CONCLUSION: Early and longer-term Textbook Outcomes have been agreed by an international consensus of experts for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. These now require clinical validation with patient data.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Laparotomy , Humans , Laparotomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Consensus , Emergencies , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
2.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(7 Suppl 1): e14-e24, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959356

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding anticoagulation monitoring assays and target levels in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE. DATA SOURCES: A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Anticoagulation monitoring of pediatric patients on ECMO. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving any conflicts. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool or the revised Cochrane risk of bias for randomized trials, as appropriate and the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-based recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements for clinical recommendations focused on anticoagulation monitoring and targets, using a web-based modified Delphi process to build consensus (defined as > 80% agreement). One weak recommendation, two consensus statements, and three good practice statements were developed and, in all, agreement greater than 80% was reached. We also derived some resources for anticoagulation monitoring for ECMO clinician use at the bedside. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to formulate optimal anticoagulation monitoring during pediatric ECMO, but we propose one recommendation, two consensus and three good practice statements. Overall, the available pediatric evidence is poor and significant gaps exist in the literature.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Delphi Technique , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Humans , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Child , Drug Monitoring/methods , Consensus
3.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(7 Suppl 1): e25-e34, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959357

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding prophylactic transfusions in neonates and children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) from the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE. DATA SOURCES: A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2020, with an update in May 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies assessed use of prophylactic blood product transfusion in pediatric ECMO. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving conflicts. Thirty-three references were used for data extraction and informed recommendations. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-informed recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements or good practice statements for prophylactic transfusion strategies for children supported with ECMO. A web-based modified Delphi process was used to build consensus via the Research And Development/University of California Appropriateness Method. Consensus was based on a modified Delphi process with agreement defined as greater than 80%. We developed two good practice statements, 4 weak recommendations, and three expert consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the frequency with which pediatric ECMO patients are transfused, there is insufficient evidence to formulate evidence-based prophylactic transfusion strategies.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion , Delphi Technique , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Humans , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Child , Blood Transfusion/standards , Blood Transfusion/methods , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Consensus , Child, Preschool
4.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(7 Suppl 1): e1-e6, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959354

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding the influence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit components on anticoagulation practices for pediatric ECMO for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE. DATA SOURCES: A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Management of ECMO anticoagulation in the setting of different ECMO circuit components. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving conflicts. Twenty-nine references were used for data extraction and informed recommendations, evidence-based consensus statements, and good practice statements. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-based recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements or good practice statements for the influence of ECMO circuit and components on anticoagulation management. A web-based modified Delphi process was used to build consensus via the Research And Development/University of California Appropriateness Method. Consensus was defined as greater than 80% agreement. One good practice statement, 2 weak recommendations, and 2 consensus statements are presented. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of new component technologies into clinical practice has outpaced clinical investigations of anticoagulation strategies for pediatric ECMO. Future investigations should leverage academic and industrial collaborations, translational platforms, and modern biostatistical methods to improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Delphi Technique , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Humans , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Child , Consensus
5.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(7 Suppl 1): e44-e52, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959359

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding antifibrinolytic and adjunct hemostatic agents in neonates and children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE consensus conference. DATA SOURCES: A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Use of antifibrinolytics (epsilon-aminocaproic acid [EACA] or tranexamic acid), recombinant factor VII activated (rFVIIa), or topical hemostatic agents (THAs). DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving conflicts. Eleven references were used for data extraction and informed recommendations. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-based recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements for the management of bleeding and thrombotic complications in pediatric ECMO patients. A web-based modified Delphi process was used to build consensus via the Research And Development/University of California Appropriateness Method. Consensus was defined as greater than 80% agreement. One weak recommendation and three consensus statements are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supporting recommendations for administration of antifibrinolytics (EACA or tranexamic acid), rFVIIa, and THAs were sparse and inconclusive. Much work remains to determine effective and safe usage strategies.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Delphi Technique , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Hemostatics , Tranexamic Acid , Humans , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Child , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Tranexamic Acid/administration & dosage , Factor VIIa/therapeutic use , Factor VIIa/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Infant, Newborn , Aminocaproic Acid/therapeutic use , Aminocaproic Acid/administration & dosage , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Infant , Consensus
6.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(7 Suppl 1): e7-e13, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959355

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding the medications used for anticoagulation for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE (PEACE). DATA SOURCES: A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies assessed anticoagulation used in pediatric ECMO. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third reviewer adjudicating any conflicts. Eighteen references were used for data extraction as well as for creation of recommendations. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-informed recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements, or good practice statements for anticoagulation during pediatric ECMO. A web-based modified Delphi process was used to build consensus via the Research and Development/University of California Appropriateness Method. Consensus was based on a modified Delphi process with agreement defined as greater than 80%. Two recommendations, two consensus statements, and one good practice statement were developed, and, in all, agreement greater than 80% was reached. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to formulate optimal anticoagulation therapy during pediatric ECMO. Additional high-quality research is needed to inform evidence-based practice for anticoagulation during pediatric ECMO.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Delphi Technique , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Humans , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Child , Consensus
7.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(7 Suppl 1): e53-e65, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959360

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To derive systematic review-informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding the management of children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) undergoing invasive procedures or interventions developed by the Pediatric Anticoagulation on ECMO CollaborativE (PEACE) Consensus Conference. DATA SOURCES: A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021. STUDY SELECTION: ECMO anticoagulation and hemostasis management in the perioperative period and during procedures. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving any conflicts. Seventeen references were used for data extraction and informed recommendations. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-based recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements for the management of bleeding and thrombotic complications in pediatric ECMO patients. A web-based modified Delphi process was used to build consensus via the Research And Development/University of California Appropriateness Method. Consensus was defined as greater than 80% agreement. Four good practice statements, 7 recommendations, and 18 consensus statements are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Although agreement among experts was strong, important future research is required in this population for evidence-informed recommendations.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Delphi Technique , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Humans , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Child , Perioperative Period , Consensus , Perioperative Care/methods , Perioperative Care/standards , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Thrombosis/etiology
8.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(7 Suppl 1): e66-e77, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959361

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding the management of bleeding and thrombotic complications during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE Consensus Conference. DATA SOURCES: A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021. STUDY SELECTION: The management of bleeding and thrombotic complications of ECMO. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving conflicts. Twelve references were used for data extraction and informed recommendations. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-based recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements for the management of bleeding and thrombotic complications in pediatric ECMO patients. A web-based modified Delphi process was used to build consensus via the Research And Development/University of California Appropriateness Method. Consensus was defined as greater than 80% agreement. Two good practice statements, 5 weak recommendations, and 18 consensus statements are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Although bleeding and thrombotic complications during pediatric ECMO remain common, limited definitive data exist to support an evidence-based approach to treating these complications. Research is needed to improve hemostatic management of children supported with ECMO.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Delphi Technique , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Hemorrhage , Thrombosis , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Humans , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/therapy , Hemorrhage/etiology , Child , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Consensus
9.
Transpl Int ; 37: 12445, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962472

ABSTRACT

While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field's incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Graft Rejection , Heart Transplantation , Lung Transplantation , Humans , Biomarkers/blood , Biopsy , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , Consensus , Europe , Gene Expression Profiling , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Societies, Medical
10.
Health Expect ; 27(4): e14130, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962988

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There is currently limited guidance for researchers on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) for preclinical spinal cord research, leading to uncertainty about design and implementation. This study aimed to develop evidence-informed principles to support preclinical spinal cord researchers to incorporate PPI into their research. METHODS: This study used a modified Delphi method with the aim of establishing consensus on a set of principles for PPI in spinal cord research. Thirty-eight stakeholders including researchers, clinicians and people living with spinal cord injury took part in the expert panel. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with a series of statements relating to PPI in preclinical spinal cord research over two rounds. As part of Round 2, they were also asked to rate statements as essential or desirable. RESULTS: Thirty-eight statements were included in Round 1, after which five statements were amended and two additional statements were added. After Round 2, consensus (> 75% agreement) was reached for a total of 27 principles, with 13 rated as essential and 14 rated as desirable. The principles with highest agreement related to diversity in representation among PPI contributors, clarity of the purpose of PPI and effective communication. CONCLUSION: This research developed a previously unavailable set of evidence-informed principles to inform PPI in preclinical spinal cord research. These principles provide guidance for researchers seeking to conduct PPI in preclinical spinal cord research and may also inform PPI in other preclinical disciplines. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT STATEMENT: This study was conducted as part of a project aiming to develop PPI in preclinical spinal cord injury research associated with an ongoing research collaboration funded by the Irish Rugby Football Union Charitable Trust (IRFU CT) and the Science Foundation Ireland Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research (SFI AMBER), with research conducted by the Tissue Engineering Research Group (TERG) at the RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences. The project aims to develop an advanced biomaterials platform for spinal cord repair and includes a PPI Advisory Panel comprising researchers, clinicians and seriously injured rugby players to oversee the work of the project. PPI is included in this study through the involvement of members of the PPI Advisory Panel in the conceptualisation of this research, review of findings, identification of key points for discussion and preparation of the study manuscript as co-authors.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Patient Participation , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Community Participation/methods , Male , Consensus , Female , Biomedical Research , Stakeholder Participation
11.
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi ; 45(4): 322-329, 2024 Apr 14.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951058

ABSTRACT

The general population in China is aging, and thus the number of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will continue to increase. Individualized treatment is required to maximize therapeutic potential while minimizing the risk of toxicity. To improve the diagnosis and treatment of DLBCL in older people in China, the Lymphocyte Disease Group of the Hematology Division of the Chinese Medical Association and Lymphoma Expert Commitee of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) have organized relevant experts to formulate this consensus.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Humans , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/therapy , Aged , China
12.
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi ; 45(4): 330-338, 2024 Apr 14.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951059

ABSTRACT

Blood cell morphological examination is a crucial method for the diagnosis of blood diseases, but traditional manual microscopy is characterized by low efficiency and susceptibility to subjective biases. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has improved the efficiency and quality of blood cell examinations and facilitated the standardization of test results. Currently, a variety of AI devices are either in clinical use or under research, with diverse technical requirements and configurations. The Experimental Diagnostic Study Group of the Hematology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association has organized a panel of experts to formulate this consensus. The consensus covers term definitions, scope of application, technical requirements, clinical application, data management, and information security. It emphasizes the importance of specimen preparation, image acquisition, image segmentation algorithms, and cell feature extraction and classification, and sets forth basic requirements for the cell recognition spectrum. Moreover, it provides detailed explanations regarding the fine classification of pathological cells, requirements for cell training and testing, quality control standards, and assistance in issuing diagnostic reports by humans. Additionally, the consensus underscores the significance of data management and information security to ensure the safety of patient information and the accuracy of data.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Blood Cells , Consensus , Humans , Blood Cells/cytology , China , Algorithms
13.
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi ; 45(4): 313-321, 2024 Apr 14.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951057

ABSTRACT

Flow cytometry plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of plasma cell diseases, particularly in the detection of circulating plasma cells (CPCs) in the peripheral blood. A consensus about the normalized use of flow cytometry in detection of CPCs in peripheral blood in clinical practice has been achieved. This consensus is founded on evidence-based principles, which elucidates the timing and value of flow cytometry for the detection of CPCs in the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering myeloma, multiple myeloma, and plasma cell leukemia and standardizes flow cytometry in the detection of CPCs in plasma cell diseases.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry , Multiple Myeloma , Plasma Cells , Flow Cytometry/methods , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/blood , China , Paraproteinemias/diagnosis , Paraproteinemias/blood , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/diagnosis , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/blood , Consensus , East Asian People
15.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 104(25): 2296-2307, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951102

ABSTRACT

Insomnia disorder is the most common sleep disorder. It not only increases the risk of multiple somatic and mental disorders, but also carries a heavy social health economic burden. Currently, there is a lack of diagnosis and treatment standards for insomnia disorder in primary medical institutions at home and abroad. To this end, the Chinese Sleep Research Society organized domestic sleep medical experts in sleep medicine to develop this consensus based on the latest research on insomnia disorder. The current consensus elaborates on the pathophysiological mechanism, epidemiology, diagnosis, screening assessment, prevention and control measures and basic management, and has established a total of 15 recommendations. These recommendations aim to provide comprehensive and standardized references and guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia disorder.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/therapy , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/diagnosis , China
16.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 104(25): 2308-2322, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951103

ABSTRACT

The interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway plays a crucial role in various rheumatic diseases. Tocilizumab, a biologic targeting IL-6 receptor, has been widely used in clinical practice, though it's officially approved in China for only three indications. To address clinical challenges associated with the off-label use of tocilizumab in treating rheumatic diseases, the Committee of Chinese Primary Health Care Foundation for Rheumatologists and Immunologists engaged multidisciplinary experts and highlight 12 related clinical issues. We aggregated the drug specifications, the guidelines for clinical management of rheumatic diseases and the evidence from clinical research. Recommendations were formed through voting with the consensus conference method incorporating the Oxford evidence-based medicine criteria to evaluate the strength of evidence and recommendations. We have formulated 10 recommendations for off-label use of tocilizumab related to giant cell arteritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, Takayasu arteritis, systemic sclerosis, adult-onset Still's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. This consensus aims to provide references for the rational use of tocilizumab in clinical practice and enhance pharmacovigilance monitoring.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Off-Label Use , Rheumatic Diseases , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , China , Consensus , Interleukin-6 , East Asian People
17.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1366229, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966224

ABSTRACT

Background: Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is a clinical disorder characterized by increased adiposity and decreased muscle mass and function, commonly observed in older adults. However, most of the studies that investigated SO prevalence rates were not based on current standardized diagnostic methods. Thus, this study aims to estimate the prevalence rates of SO and their level of agreement using different instruments proposed by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) Consensus, in a sample of hospitalized older adults with severe obesity. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 90 older adults (≥ 60 years) with severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m/²) seeking an in-hospital multidisciplinary body weight reduction program. Skeletal muscle function was assessed using the five-repetition Sit-Stand test (5-SSt) and Handgrip Strength (HGS). Body composition was evaluated by high percentages of fat mass (FM), low appendicular lean mass (ALM/W), and skeletal muscle mass (SMM/W), adjusted to body weight. The stage of SO was assessed on the presence of at least one comorbidity and specific cut-offs were adopted for each step. All analyses were performed according to gender and age range. Results: The prevalence rates of SO in the total sample were 23.3%, 25.5%, 31.1%, and 40.0% considering altered values of 5-SSt+FM+ALM/W, HGS+FM+ALM/W, 5-SSt+FMSSM/W, and HGS+FM+SSM/W, respectively. Higher prevalence rates were observed among female and old elderly subgroups, regardless of the diagnostic combination. There were weak agreements between the muscle function tests (5-SSt versus HGS) using both muscle mass indexes in the total sample and all subgroups. Moderate agreements were observed between muscle mass indexes (SMM/W versus ALM/W) in the total sample, male and younger older adults (using 5-SSt), and strong agreements for men and younger older adults (using HGS). Conclusion: The discrepancies observed between the prevalence rates and their levels of agreement reinforce the need for new studies in similar populations aiming for better standardization of SO assessment.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Consensus , Sarcopenia , Humans , Male , Female , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Sarcopenia/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Prevalence , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Obesity, Morbid/physiopathology , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Obesity, Morbid/diagnosis , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Hand Strength , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Body Mass Index
18.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 489, 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The demand for urgent psychiatric care is increasing, but in Spain there are no clear recommendations for emergency departments (ED) on how to optimize care for patients with psychiatric emergencies. We aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on the requirements for general hospitals´ emergency departments to treat patients with urgent psychiatric symptoms. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi technique. A scientific committee compiled 36 statements based on literature search and clinical experience. The statements covered the organizational model, facilities, staffing, safety, patient interventions, and staff training. A panel of 38 psychiatry specialists with expertise in psychiatric emergencies evaluated the questionnaire in two rounds. RESULTS: After two rounds of voting, 30 out of 36 proposed items (83%) were agreed upon. The panel agreed that psychiatric emergencies should be managed in a general hospital, with dedicated facilities for patient assessment, direct supervision of patients at risk, and an observation unit run by the psychiatric service. In addition to the psychiatrist, the ED should have specialist nurses and security staff available 24/7. Social workers should also be readily available. ED and consulting rooms should be designed to ensure patient and staff safety. A triage system should be established for patients with psychiatric symptoms, with medical evaluation preceding psychiatric evaluation. Guidance on supplies, equipment, and staff training is also provided. CONCLUSION: All ED in general hospitals should have adequate resources to handle any psychiatric emergency. This paper provides recommendations on the minimum requirements to achieve this goal.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Delphi Technique , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Spain , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Mental Disorders/therapy , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/standards , Hospitals, General/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Nurs Open ; 11(7): e2229, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957104

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the consensus and importance of care practices related to the management of peripheral venous catheter (PVC)-related phlebitis in hospitalized patients through the views of experts from different disciplines. BACKGROUND: PVCs are commonly used in hospitals but are associated with complications such as phlebitis. Their management differs widely, and studies are heterogeneous. DESIGN: Delphi method. METHODS: Four stages: problem area (with Web of Science bibliometric review in July 2022), panel members, two Delphi rounds and closing criteria. In the Delphi survey, experts answered an online questionnaire based on assessment, treatment and follow-up dimensions (September 2022-February 2023). Statistical analyses were conducted of frequencies, percentages, measures of central tendency and levels of dispersion (QD). A space for comments was created, and a thematic analysis conducted of them. RESULTS: Eighteen experts (nurses, doctors and pharmacists) participated in the Delphi rounds. Forty-five activities were identified: 19 in assessment, 15 in treatment and 11 in follow-up. A high consensus level (QD ≤ 0.6) was found in five activities (11.12%), moderate level (0.6 < QD < 1.0) in 19 (42.22%) and low level (QD > 1.0) in 21 (46.66%). Seven themes were determined (patient perspective, lack of consensus, low evidence-based practices, stage-based treatments, prevention activities, high variability in practice and specialist teams and interdisciplinary work). CONCLUSION: The importance of systematic assessment scales is highlighted together with consensus on signs and symptoms (pain, redness, inflammation, palpable cord and induration). Treatment according to severity and daily visual recording and monitoring are emphasized along with the need for patient participation and healthcare literacy. A high level of consensus was obtained in 11% of the activities, showing the large variability of criteria and interventions for phlebitis management. Highlighted needs include working in a team, the use of specialist teams and promoting evidence- and prevention-based activities. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinical variability is noted and, therefore, the importance of consensus on standardized care for PVC phlebitis and evidence-based practice. REPORTING METHOD: Delphi studies (CREDES). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Experts contribution.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral , Delphi Technique , Phlebitis , Humans , Phlebitis/etiology , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Consensus , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Internationality
20.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(3)2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38964885

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Workplace violence (WPV) is a complex global challenge in healthcare that can only be addressed through a quality improvement initiative composed of a complex intervention. However, multiple WPV-specific quality indicators are required to effectively monitor WPV and demonstrate an intervention's impact. This study aims to determine a set of quality indicators capable of effectively monitoring WPV in healthcare. METHODS: This study used a modified Delphi process to systematically arrive at an expert consensus on relevant WPV quality indicators at a large, multisite academic health science centre in Toronto, Canada. The expert panel consisted of 30 stakeholders from the University Health Network (UHN) and its affiliates. Relevant literature-based quality indicators which had been identified through a rapid review were categorised according to the Donabedian model and presented to experts for two consecutive Delphi rounds. RESULTS: 87 distinct quality indicators identified through the rapid review process were assessed by our expert panel. The surveys received an average response rate of 83.1% in the first round and 96.7% in the second round. From the initial set of 87 quality indicators, our expert panel arrived at a consensus on 17 indicators including 7 structure, 6 process and 4 outcome indicators. A WPV dashboard was created to provide real-time data on each of these indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Using a modified Delphi methodology, a set of quality indicators validated by expert opinion was identified measuring WPV specific to UHN. The indicators identified in this study were found to be operationalisable at UHN and will provide longitudinal quality monitoring. They will inform data visualisation and dissemination tools which will impact organisational decision-making in real time.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Health Personnel , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Workplace Violence , Humans , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Personnel/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Canada , Consensus
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...