Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263415, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35134083

ABSTRACT

This study determined the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in open fire stoves and improved cookstoves users (ICS) in the rural Peruvian Andes. Participants answered a socioeconomic questionnaire, one 24-hour food recall and underwent a physical examination. We analysed data from 385 participants, 190 (112 women and 78 men) were ICS users and 195 (123 women and 72 men) were open fire stove users. The prevalence of MetS was 21.3, 26.4% in women and 13.3% in men. We found no statistically significant association between the type of cookstove and MetS. Body mass index and altitude were important determinants of MetS. Research on cardiometabolic diseases and open fire stove use contributes to understanding the effect of household air pollution on health in high altitude populations.


Subject(s)
Cooking and Eating Utensils/statistics & numerical data , Cooking/methods , Metabolic Syndrome/etiology , Adult , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Altitude , Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics , Family Characteristics , Female , Fires , Household Products , Humans , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Particulate Matter/analysis , Peru , Rural Population/trends , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Multimedia | Multimedia Resources | ID: multimedia-9346

ABSTRACT

Será que precisa de muitos utensílios para cozinhar? Não! Cidinha dá jeito de cozinhar com poucos, pois o que vale é a qualidade e conservação da panela, faca, tábua...A arrumação na cozinha também é importante para deixa-la mais funcional e convidativa! Para saber mais sobre os utensílios e arrumação na cozinha.


Subject(s)
Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics
3.
BMC Res Notes ; 12(1): 426, 2019 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31315655

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Previous research suggests that wine glass size affects sales of wine in bars, with more wine purchased when served in larger glasses. The current four studies, conducted in one restaurant (Studies 1 and 2) and two bars (Studies 3 and 4) in Cambridge, England, aim to establish the reproducibility of this effect of glass size on sales. A multiple treatment reversal design was used, involving wine being served in sequential fortnightly periods in different sized glasses of the same design (290 ml, 350 ml, and 450 ml). The primary outcome was daily wine volume (ml) sold. RESULTS: Restaurant: Daily wine volume sold was 13% (95% CI 2%, 24%) higher when served with 350 ml vs. 290 ml glasses in Study 1. A similar direction of effect was seen in Study 2 (6%; 95% CI - 1%, 15%). Bars: Daily wine volume sold was 21% (95% CI 9%, 35%) higher when served with 450 ml vs. 350 ml glasses in Study 3. This effect was not observed in Study 4 (- 7%, 95% CI - 16%, 3%). Meaningful differences were not demonstrated with any other glass comparison. These results partially replicate previous studies showing that larger glasses increase wine sales. Considerable uncertainty remains about the magnitude of any effect and the contexts in which it might occur. Trial registration Study 1: ISRCTN17958895 (21/07/2017), Study 2: ISRCTN17097810 (29/03/2018), Study 3 and 4: ISRCTN39401124 (10/05/2018).


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Commerce/statistics & numerical data , Portion Size/psychology , Restaurants/economics , Wine , Consumer Behavior/economics , Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics , England , Glass , Humans
4.
Br J Nutr ; 116(11): 1974-1983, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27976604

ABSTRACT

Exposure to large portion sizes is a risk factor for obesity. Specifically designed tableware may modulate how much is eaten and help with portion control. We examined the experience of using a guided crockery set (CS) and a calibrated serving spoon set (SS) by individuals trying to manage their weight. Twenty-nine obese adults who had completed 7-12 weeks of a community weight-loss programme were invited to use both tools for 2 weeks each, in a crossover design, with minimal health professional contact. A paper-based questionnaire was used to collect data on acceptance, perceived changes in portion size, frequency, and type of meal when the tool was used. Scores describing acceptance, ease of use and perceived effectiveness were derived from five-point Likert scales from which binary indicators (high/low) were analysed using logistic regression. Mean acceptance, ease of use and perceived effectiveness were moderate to high (3·7-4·4 points). Tool type did not have an impact on indicators of acceptance, ease of use and perceived effectiveness (P>0·32 for all comparisons); 55 % of participants used the CS on most days v. 21 % for the SS. The CS was used for all meals, whereas the SS was mostly used for evening meals. Self-selected portion sizes increased for vegetables and decreased for chips and potatoes with both tools. Participants rated both tools as equally acceptable, easy to use and with similar perceived effectiveness. Formal trials to evaluate the impact of such tools on weight control are warranted.


Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Cooking and Eating Utensils , Diet, Reducing/methods , Obesity/diet therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Compliance , Portion Size/standards , Adult , Body Mass Index , Calibration , Consumer Behavior/economics , Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics , Cross-Over Studies , Diet, Healthy/economics , Diet, Healthy/psychology , Diet, Healthy/standards , Diet, Reducing/economics , Diet, Reducing/psychology , Diet, Reducing/standards , Feeding Behavior/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Meals/psychology , Middle Aged , Obesity/economics , Obesity/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Compliance/psychology , Patient Education as Topic/economics , Portion Size/adverse effects , Portion Size/economics , Self Report , United Kingdom , Weight Reduction Programs
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25111811

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the non-intentionally added substances--formaldehyde and trace metals--at 4% acetic acid conditions in rubber and metallic packaging/utensils. The temperature effect on migration in rubber and metallic packaging/utensils was monitored at 60 °C and 100 °C under acidic (pH < 3) circumstances. The concentrations were: formaldehyde--23.1 µg kg⁻¹, lead--13.41 µg kg⁻¹, cadmium--0.15 µg kg⁻¹, total arsenic--2.02 µg kg⁻¹ and nickel--2.92 µg kg⁻¹ at 60 °C and formaldehyde--148.9 µg kg⁻¹, lead--17.04 µg kg⁻¹, cadmium--0.14 µg kg⁻¹, total arsenic--7.25 µg kg⁻¹ and nickel--8.7 µg kg⁻¹ at 100 °C. A significant difference was noticed in formaldehyde and total arsenic between both temperatures (p < 0.01), which was not present in other trace metals. In conclusion, formaldehyde and total arsenic were more sensitive with cooking temperature than the other metals.


Subject(s)
Cooking and Eating Utensils , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Packaging , Formaldehyde/analysis , Metals, Heavy/analysis , Metals/chemistry , Rubber/chemistry , Arsenic/analysis , Arsenic/chemistry , Arsenic/toxicity , Cadmium/analysis , Cadmium/chemistry , Cadmium/toxicity , Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics , Cooking and Eating Utensils/standards , Food Packaging/economics , Food Packaging/standards , Formaldehyde/chemistry , Formaldehyde/toxicity , Guidelines as Topic , Hot Temperature/adverse effects , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Lead/analysis , Lead/chemistry , Lead/toxicity , Limit of Detection , Materials Testing , Metals, Heavy/chemistry , Metals, Heavy/toxicity , Nickel/analysis , Nickel/chemistry , Nickel/toxicity , Reproducibility of Results , Republic of Korea , Solubility
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25407881

ABSTRACT

In 2011, the European Union prohibited the production of polycarbonate (PC) baby bottles due to the toxic effects of the PC monomer bisphenol-A. Therefore, baby bottles made of alternative materials, e.g. polypropylene (PP) or polyethersulphone (PES), are currently marketed. The principal aim of the study was the identification of major compounds migrating from baby bottles using a liquid-liquid extraction followed by GC/MS analysis. A 50% EtOH in water solution was selected as a simulant for milk. After sterilisation of the bottle, three migration experiments were performed during 2 h at 70°C. A non-targeted liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate-n-hexane (1:1) was performed on the simulant samples. Identification of migrants from 24 baby bottles was done using commercially available WILEY and NIST mass spectra libraries. Differences in the migrating compounds and their intensities were observed between the different types of plastics, but also between the same polymer from a different producer. Differences in the migration patterns were perceived as well between the sterilisation and the migrations and within the different migrations. Silicone, Tritan™ and PP exhibited a wide variety of migrating compounds, whereas PES and polyamide (PA) showed a lower amount of migrants, though sometimes in relatively large concentrations (azacyclotridecan-2-one up to 250 µg kg⁻¹). Alkanes (especially in PP bottles), phthalates (dibutylphthalate in one PP bottle (±40 µg kg⁻¹) and one silicone bottle (±25 µg kg⁻¹); diisobutylphthalate in one PP (±10 µg kg⁻¹), silicone (up to ±80 µg kg⁻¹); and Tritan™ bottle (±30 µg kg⁻¹)), antioxidants (Irgafos 168, degradation products of Irganox 1010 and Irganox 1076), etc. were detected for PP, silicone and Tritan™ bottles. Although the concentrations were relatively low, some compounds not authorised by European Union Regulation No. 10/2011, such as 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (10-100 µg kg⁻¹) or 2-butoxyethyl acetate (about 300 µg kg⁻¹) were detected. Migrating chemicals were identified as confirmed (using a standard) or as tentative (further confirmation required).


Subject(s)
Cooking and Eating Utensils , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Infant Formula/chemistry , Materials Testing/methods , Models, Chemical , Plasticizers/analysis , Plastics/chemistry , Belgium , Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics , Cooking and Eating Utensils/standards , Databases, Chemical , Diffusion , Ethanol/chemistry , European Union , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Hot Temperature , Humans , Infant , Liquid-Liquid Extraction , Plasticizers/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Solubility , Solvents/chemistry
7.
PLoS One ; 7(2): e30338, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22348005

ABSTRACT

Current attention to improved cook stoves (ICS) focuses on the "triple benefits" they provide, in improved health and time savings for households, in preservation of forests and associated ecosystem services, and in reducing emissions that contribute to global climate change. Despite the purported economic benefits of such technologies, however, progress in achieving large-scale adoption and use has been remarkably slow. This paper uses Monte Carlo simulation analysis to evaluate the claim that households will always reap positive and large benefits from the use of such technologies. Our analysis allows for better understanding of the variability in economic costs and benefits of ICS use in developing countries, which depend on unknown combinations of numerous uncertain parameters. The model results suggest that the private net benefits of ICS will sometimes be negative, and in many instances highly so. Moreover, carbon financing and social subsidies may help enhance incentives to adopt, but will not always be appropriate. The costs and benefits of these technologies are most affected by their relative fuel costs, time and fuel use efficiencies, the incidence and cost-of-illness of acute respiratory illness, and the cost of household cooking time. Combining these results with the fact that households often find these technologies to be inconvenient or culturally inappropriate leads us to understand why uptake has been disappointing. Given the current attention to the scale up of ICS, this analysis is timely and important for highlighting some of the challenges for global efforts to promote ICS.


Subject(s)
Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics , Cooking and Eating Utensils/standards , Climate , Climate Change , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Developing Countries , Health , Trees
8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21181596

ABSTRACT

A simple measurement of sample density by adopting the principles of buoyancy could help screen counterfeit melamine ware if the density was below 1.50 g cm⁻³. However, samples with a density exceeding 1.50 g cm⁻³ were not necessarily made from melamine formaldehyde. FTIR analysis showed that all counterfeit products were made of urea formaldehyde and coated on the food-contact side with melamine formaldehyde, a tactic probably intended to cover up the true product features. The overall migration of real and counterfeit melamine samples complied with both European Union and Thai regulations, as the exposure layers in both cases were melamine formaldehyde. Formaldehyde migration failed to comply with Thai standards, but this was not the case for European Union standards. However, the results showed a significant inconsistency between individual items of the same brand and between individual exposures of the same test specimen. This indicated the inherent inhomogeneity between individual items, which mainly resulted from the manufacturing process: for instance, insufficient temperature and time to obtain complete polycondensation of monomers. Therefore, it is recommended that constant surveillance be conducted on melamine articles available in the marketplace in terms of quality and safety.


Subject(s)
Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics , Food Contamination , Fraud , Resins, Synthetic/chemistry , Triazines/chemistry , Carcinogens/analysis , Carcinogens/chemistry , Chemical Phenomena , Cooking and Eating Utensils/standards , European Union , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Formaldehyde/analysis , Formaldehyde/chemistry , Solubility , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Surface Properties , Thailand , Urea/chemistry
9.
Gastronomica (Berkeley Calif) ; 10(1): 24-31, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21495288

ABSTRACT

This article applies the rhetorical and deliberately provocative approach of the watershed essay art historian Linda Nochlin wrote in 1971­"Why Have there Been No Great Women Artists?"­to today's culinary industry. Nochlin used the question her title posed as a theoretical trap that would draw attention not only to the inherent sexism or prejudice that pervades the way the public perceives art, but also to those same issues' existence within and impact on academia and the other cultural institutions responsible for posing these sorts of questions. Nochlin bypassed the obvious and irrelevant debate over women's being less or differently talented and, in so doing, exposed that debate for being a distraction from the heart of the matter: how, sociologically (media) or institutionally (museums, foundations, etc.), people define a "great artist." Although it's 40 years later, the polemic is as effective when used to understand the gender divide in the food world.


Subject(s)
Cooking , Food , Prejudice , Social Problems , Women, Working , Cooking/history , Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics , Cooking and Eating Utensils/history , Diet/economics , Diet/ethnology , Diet/history , Diet/psychology , Food/economics , Food/history , Food Industry/economics , Food Industry/education , Food Industry/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Occupations/history , Social Problems/economics , Social Problems/ethnology , Social Problems/history , Social Problems/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Problems/psychology , United States/ethnology , Women's Health/ethnology , Women's Health/history , Women's Rights/economics , Women's Rights/education , Women's Rights/history , Women's Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Women, Working/education , Women, Working/history , Women, Working/legislation & jurisprudence , Women, Working/psychology
10.
Hospitals ; 54(6): 101-3, 1980 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7353866

ABSTRACT

A national forum for sharing cost containment ideas has been developed and implemented by ASHFSA to help hospitals hold the line on rising food costs.


Subject(s)
Food Service, Hospital/economics , Cooking and Eating Utensils/economics , Cost Control , Efficiency , Food Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Societies, Hospital , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...