Using a Cone-Shaped Glass Funnel Adapter Reduces Endothelial Cell Loss Caused by Preloading Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were (1) to compare "front" and "rear" methods for loading Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue into both micro-Jones and standard-Jones tubes and (2) to evaluate the efficacy of a cone-shaped glass funnel adapter designed to make loading DMEK tissue safer for corneal endothelial cells. METHODS: The corneal endothelium was stained with 0.06% trypan blue to confirm equivalence between mate corneas. The tissues were then processed using the Iowa Lions Eye Bank standard DMEK protocol. In comparison 1, one mate was loaded into the rear of a micro-Jones or standard-Jones tube and the other was loaded into the front of the same tube. In comparison 2, one mate was loaded into the front of the micro-Jones tube and the other was loaded through the cone-shaped funnel adapter into the rear. All tissues were ejected through the front of the modified Jones tubes and assessed for endothelial cell loss (ECL) with calcein AM staining, FIJI, and Trainable Weka Segmentation; scroll widths were measured digitally. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in ECL between front and rear loading [micro (N = 6 pairs): front 15.74% vs. rear 17.95%; standard (N = 6 pairs): front 19.58% vs. rear 19.17%; all P > 0.05]. DMEK scrolls loaded with the funnel adapter exhibited lower ECL compared with scrolls loaded through the front [micro (N = 8 pairs): front 13.53% vs. loading funnel 2.40%; P < 0.001]. Loading with the adapter was not faster (front 6.66 seconds vs. loading funnel 5.52 seconds; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Using a cone-shaped DMEK loading funnel may reduce ECL sustained during preloading.

Different patterns in the corneal endothelial cell loss after pars plana and pars limbal insertion of the Baerveldt glaucoma implant.

PURPOSE: To assess corneal endothelial cell (CE) loss after pars plana (PP) and pars limbal (PL) insertion of a Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI). DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter interventional comparative study. METHODS: We studied central CE loss for 5 years after BGI surgery in 192 eyes. RESULTS: The prevalence of bullous keratopathy (BK) was greater in the PL cohort than in the PP cohort (P = .003). The CE loss after simultaneous PP vitrectomy and tube insertion into the vitreous cavity was 11.9% in the first year, which was greater than that of 2.9% in eyes where the tube was inserted simply into the vitreous cavity after a prior vitrectomy (P = .046). The annual percentage CE loss after the first year decreased unidirectionally in both of those groups and was 1.3% and 1.0% in the fifth year, respectively (P < .001). For limbal insertion, the CE loss in the simple PL cohort was biphasic, decreasing from 10.5% in the first year to 7.0% in the fifth year. Simultaneous cataract and BGI surgery enhanced the CE loss slightly in the first year in the PP and PL cohorts to 13.0% and 14.0%, respectively. However, these increases were not significant (P = .816 and .358, respectively). Low preoperative CE density (P < .001) and insertion site (P = .020) were significant risk factors for the development of BK. CONCLUSIONS: CE loss in the PL and PP cohorts was biphasic and unidirectional, respectively. The difference in annual CE loss became evident over time. PP tube implantation may be advantageous when the preoperative CE density is low.

Comparison of Pre-Descemet Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Endothelial Decompensation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in cases of endothelial decompensation. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, interventional study conducted at a tertiary eye hospital in North India. Thirty eyes of 28 patients with corneal decompensation were randomly subjected to PDEK (n = 15 eyes) and DMEK (n = 15 eyes). Preoperative demographic details, surgical indications, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, anterior and posterior segment details, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count, and corneal aberrometry tracing on wavefront analysis were recorded. Patients were followed up for 6 months postsurgery. Visual and graft survival outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Intraoperatively, a surgeon reported better ease of preparation and intracameral handling with PDEK grafts. Both groups showed comparable improvement in visual acuity, contrast, and high-order aberrations. A decrease in central corneal thickness was significantly higher in DMEK (196 ± 26 vs. 140 ± 14 µm) patients. DMEK grafts were significantly thinner than PDEK grafts at the 6-month follow-up (16 ± 2.17 vs. 27.2 ± 1.93 µm). Endothelial cell loss (35% in DMEK vs. 33.4% in PDEK, P = 0.48) and rise of intraocular pressure (from 15.33 ± 2.85 mm Hg to 15.53 ± 2.2 mm Hg in the DMEK group vs. from 14.6 ± 1.99 mm Hg to 16.2 ± 1.43 mm Hg in the PDEK group) were comparable. Rebubbling rates were higher in the DMEK group (3/15, 20%) compared with the PDEK group (1/15, 6.66%; P = 0.165). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK and PDEK were comparable for both quantitative and qualitative visual outcomes and anatomically for graft survival at the 6-month follow-up.

Influence of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation Patterns on Postoperative Clinical Outcome.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify preparation difficulties and complications during DMEK graft preparation and their influence on clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 214 consecutive DMEK surgeries from the prospective Cologne DMEK database was performed between July 2018 and December 2019. Preparation conditions (such as central and peripheral adherences, tissue fragility, and Descemet membrane splitting) were quantified and divided into 3 groups: easy, difficult, and very difficult preparation. At follow-up (3, 6, and 12 months after DMEK), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count (ECC), and rebubbling rates were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: An easy preparation was possible in 41.6% of cases (group 1, n = 89), a difficult preparation of the DMEK graft occurred in 30.8% (group 2, n = 66), and a very difficult preparation occurred in 27.6% (group 3, n = 59). There was no difference between groups for best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 3, 6, and 12 months ( P = 0.179, P = 0.325, and P = 0.682, respectively) or for ECC at 3 and 6 months ( P = 0.537 and P = 0.606, respectively). Only at 12 months, the ECC was slightly significant between groups ( P = 0.045). Regarding the rebubbling rate, there was no difference ( P = 0.585). 17.9% of eyes from group 1, 25.7% of eyes from group 2, and 23.7% of eyes from group 3 received at least 1 rebubbling. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that difficult preparation conditions do not lead to any worsening of visual acuity or rebubbling rate in the 1-year outcome after DMEK. The endothelial cell density at 12 months showed slightly poorer results in the cases of very difficult preparation.

Clinical Outcomes of Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty With Endothelium Inward: A 24-Month Comparative Analysis Between Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy and Bullous Keratopathy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes of preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) between Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and bullous keratopathy (BK). METHODS: In this single-center retrospective clinical case series, 71 eyes of 64 patients indicated with FECD (62%) or BK (38%) (with or without cataract) were treated with preloaded DMEK grafts between March 2018 and February 2020. Standard DMEK peeling, followed by manual folding of the tissue with endothelium-inward orientation and storing in a preloaded fashion inside a 2.2-mm intraocular lens cartridge. All tissues were delivered using a bimanual pull-through technique, followed by air tamponade. Graft unfolding time, endothelial cell loss, corrected distance visual acuity, central corneal thickness, rebubbling rate, and intraoperative and postoperative complications at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were recorded. RESULTS: The mean intraoperative graft unfolding time in FECD did not differ from the BK group ( P = 0.6061). Cystoid macular edema did not differ in either group ( P = 0.6866). The rebubbling rate was found to be significantly higher in FECD compared with the BK group ( P = 0.0423). Corrected distance visual acuity significantly improved at the first month after surgery ( P = 0.0012), with no differences between FECD and BK at 24 months ( P = 0.2578). Central corneal thickness was stable postoperatively and showed no differences between the groups ( P = 0.3693). Significantly higher endothelial cell counts were observed in the FECD group at 24 months ( P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Preloaded DMEK with "endothelium-in" offers acceptable intraoperative time, rebubbling rate, and clinical outcomes in both FECD and BK groups. Patients with FECD show better postoperative clinical outcomes even if the rebubbling rate is relatively high.

Double-Scroll Formation by Fluid Column Manipulation in Preloaded DMEK Grafts Prepared From Younger and Older Donor Tissue.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether manipulation of preloaded single-scroll Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts within the fluid column of an injector can safely and reliably result in formation of double-scroll DMEK grafts and whether there are differential effects on younger versus older donor tissue. METHODS: Pairs of DMEK grafts prepared from older (65-80 years) and younger (48-64 years) donors were preloaded into a Straiko modified Jones tube. One member of the pair was manipulated within the fluid column to form a double-scroll graft, and the other remained unmanipulated. Outcomes measured include success rate for double-scroll formation, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and relative scroll width. RESULTS: Older donor grafts formed double scrolls with a 100% success rate. ECL of older donor manipulated grafts was statistically higher than that of unmanipulated mate grafts (17.4% ± 3.5% vs. 13.0% ± 4.2%, P = 0.03), but was still within the acceptable range for transplant. Younger donor grafts were successfully manipulated into double scrolls with a 67% success rate, and there was no difference in the ECL of manipulated and unmanipulated grafts (15.5% ± 4.4% vs. 13.0% ± 4.5%, P = 0.24). For all grafts and conformations, there was a significant relationship between relative scroll width and ECL ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Fluid column manipulation can be used reliably to form double-scroll DMEK grafts. For younger donor grafts, manipulation yields a double scroll without increasing ECL. For older donor grafts, manipulation results in a minimal, acceptable increase in ECL. Surgeons should weigh the advantage of an easily opened graft against the risk of increased ECL when considering this technique.

Factors Affecting the Success Rate of Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty With Endothelium-Inward Technique: A Multicenter Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors affecting the outcomes of preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (pl-DMEK) with endothelium-inward. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical case series and a comparative tissue preparation study. METHODS: Participants: Fifty-five donor tissues for ex vivo study and 147 eyes of 147 patients indicated with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy with or without cataract. INTERVENTION: Standardized DMEK peeling was performed with 9.5-mm-diameter trephination followed by second trephination for loading the graft (8.0-9.5 mm diameter). The tissues were manually preloaded with endothelium-inward and preserved for 4 days or shipped for transplantation. Live and dead assay and immunostaining was performed on ex vivo tissues. For the clinical study, the tissues were delivered using bimanual pull-through technique followed by air tamponade at all the centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tissue characteristics, donor and recipient factors, rebubbling rate, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: At day 4, significant cell loss (P = .04) was observed in pl-DMEK with loss of biomarker expression seen in prestripped and pl-DMEK tissues. Rebubbling was observed in 40.24% cases. Average ECL at 3, 6, and 12 months was 45.87%, 40.98%, and 47.54%, respectively. CDVA improved significantly at 3 months postoperation (0.23 ± 0.37 logMAR) (P < .01) compared to the baseline (0.79 ± 0.61 logMAR). A significant association (P < .05) between graft diameter, preservation time, recipient gender, gender mismatch, and recipient age to rebubbling rate was observed. CONCLUSION: Graft loading to delivery time of pl-DMEK tissues in endothelium-inward fashion must be limited to 4 days after processing. Rebubbling rate and overall surgical outcomes following preloaded DMEK can be multifactorial and center-specific.

Effect of longitudinal and torsional ultrasound on corneal endothelial cells: experimental study in rabbit eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare corneal endothelial damage from longitudinal and torsional ultrasound during phacoemulsification. SETTING: John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: 9 New Zealand white rabbits underwent bilateral surgery. After incision, the Intrepid Balanced Tip of the Centurion Ozil handpiece was inserted into the anterior chamber, and the following settings were used: 50 mL/min flow, 70 mm Hg intraocular pressure, 600 mm Hg vacuum, and 60% longitudinal (1 eye) or torsional (contralateral eye) ultrasound for 30 seconds. Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) was noted. After euthanasia and enucleation, the corneas were removed, stained with trypan blue/alizarin red, and photographed (400× photographs from 5 specific areas and 1 overview photograph from each corneal button). The ImageJ program was used to evaluate cell damage and loss in the photographs obtained from each cornea. RESULTS: Cavitation bubbles around the phacoemulsification tip were generally observed in the longitudinal group. CDE was 17.4 ± 0.58 and 6.93 ± 0.15 in the longitudinal and torsional groups, respectively (P = .003). The percentage of intact cells was statistically higher in the torsional group (94.22% ± 5.99% vs 56.85% ± 22.29%), and the percentage of lost cells was statistically higher in the longitudinal group (42.10% ± 22.02% vs 4.97% ± 6.23%) (P = .003). This was observed in the analysis of the 400× photographs and the overview photographs. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that torsional ultrasound was associated with significantly less corneal endothelial cell damage than classical longitudinal tip motion, providing further insight on mechanisms of corneal endothelial damage during phacoemulsification.

Impact of Early Intraocular Pressure Elevation on Postoperative Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Non-glaucoma Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of transient elevations in postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) on the clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery in non-glaucoma patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis from a prospective database of eyes without preexisting glaucoma that underwent DMEK with 90% anterior chamber and 20% sulfur hexafluoride endotamponade. Group A included eyes without postoperative IOP increase (IOP <30 mm Hg and a relative increase from preoperative value <10 mm Hg). Group B included eyes with IOP elevation (postoperative IOP ≥30 mm Hg or a relative increase from preoperative value ≥10 mm Hg) handled according to a standardized protocol. The impact of elevated IOP within 3 days after DMEK surgery was evaluated regarding best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell count (ECC) at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six eyes from 164 patients were included. An IOP increase after DMEK occurred in 20 eyes (11.3%; 19 patients, group B), and the mean peak IOP was 48 ± 12 mm Hg (range 32-69 mm Hg). There were no significant postoperative differences in BCVA, CCT, and ECC on comparing both groups. The BCVA increased significantly (P < 0.001, respectively), whereas CCT (P < 0.001, respectively) and ECC (P < 0.001, respectively) decreased significantly from preoperative values. The rebubbling rate tended to be higher in group B without statistical significance (6.4% vs. 10%, P = 0.648). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary IOP elevation after DMEK may not affect functional and morphological outcomes in non-glaucoma patients. However, careful postoperative IOP monitoring and appropriate management are crucial to avoid irreversible ocular damage.

Modified procedure for Loading "Flat" DMEK Grafts Into an Injector.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether loading a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft using a drop-in procedure results in more endothelial cell loss (ECL) than the standard suction procedure. METHODS: Pairs of donor corneas with equivalent preprocessing endothelium were prepared using the standard protocol of our eye bank. One member of each pair was loaded into an injector using the standard suction protocol. The mate graft was loaded using a drop-in protocol, in which the edge of the graft was gently grasped with a forceps, lifted to the edge of the injector, and dropped inside. Grafts were evaluated for ECL and examined for grab marks or other loading-associated damage. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean ECL of grafts prepared for DMEK using the standard protocol (20.6% ± 4.5%) compared with that of mate grafts prepared using the drop-in loading protocol (19.5% ± 4.8%, P = 0.59). There was no consistent pattern of damage in the drop-in-loaded grafts, as grab marks or other tissue damage associated with the drop-in loading protocol were not consistently identified by a trained corneal surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: ECL was not significantly different in grafts prepared using a drop-in loading procedure compared with grafts prepared using the standard suction protocol. The drop-in loading protocol may be particularly useful to surgeons who load their own grafts and eye bank processing technicians who encounter a "flat" DMEK graft that does not scroll or a loosely scrolled DMEK graft.

Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using Cornea From Elderly Donors Aged 80 Years and Older: In the Aftermath of Current Donor Shortage.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using corneas from elderly donors aged 80 years and older. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 78 patients who underwent DMEK-only or DMEK combined with cataract extraction (triple-DMEK) with surgeon-prepared graft between April 2016 and March 2020 were reviewed. Corrected distance visual acuity, endothelial cell density (ECD), and endothelial cell loss after 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean donor age was 83.6 ± 3.7 years (range: 80-100 years), and the mean donor ECD was 2889 ± 177 cells/mm 2 (range: 2604-3460 cells/mm 2 ). The mean recipient age was 67.2 ± 6.9 years (range: 60-89 years), and the mean follow-up was 21 ± 11 months (range: 6-52 months). The mean corrected distance visual acuity improved from a preoperative value of 1.36 ± 0.67 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution to 0.22 ± 0.18 at 6 months (n = 75), 0.21 ± 0.2 at 1 year (n = 64), and 0.23 ± 0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution at 2 years (n = 41), respectively ( P < 0.001). In 72 eyes (96%), the graft remained transparent until the last follow-up visit. The mean postoperative ECD was 2073 ±336 (n = 75), 1951 ± 379 (n = 65), and 1807 ± 431 cells/mm 2 (n = 41) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Five eyes (6.7%) had donor detachments of which 4 required rebubbling. Two grafts failed after 1 year, and 2 eyes (2.6%) had graft rejection, of which 1 eye was reverted successfully by medical management. CONCLUSIONS: Cornea from elderly donors aged 80 years and older with good selection criteria may be considered for DMEK with successful outcomes. For India and other countries with unmet tissue needs, every best single cornea counts.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Complicated Vitrectomized Eyes.

PURPOSE: Vitrectomized eyes pose a technical challenge when performing endothelial keratoplasty (EK). The aim of the study was to compare outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in complex eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) prior to or during surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive eyes that underwent pars plana infusion-assisted DMEK or pull-through DSAEK which underwent PPV prior to or during the EK at a tertiary center. Included were eyes with at least 1-year follow-up. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and serious adverse events. RESULTS: Fifty-two eyes (n = 52) with a mean follow-up time of 24.6 ± 7.4 months were included. Both groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics although the DMEK group had a significantly larger proportion of Fuchs' patients (p = .009). There was no significant difference in postoperative logMAR BCVA between groups at each visit (p > .05 for all). There was a significantly higher proportion of overall serious adverse events (50.0% versus 15.4%, p = .02), retinal detachments (19.2% versus 0.0%, p = .05) and cystoid macular edema (23.1% versus 0.0%, p = .02) following DMEK. Graft detachment occurred more often following DMEK (53.9% versus 11.5%, p = .001) with no significant difference in rebubbling rates (23.1% versus 11.5%, p = .27). CONCLUSIONS: A significant and similar improvement in BCVA was achieved following DMEK and DSAEK in complex vitrectomized eyes. Patients should be advised regarding the higher rates of potential serious complications associated with a pars plana infusion DMEK in this situation.

Ex Vivo Safety and Efficacy of Paired Peripheral Incisions in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts to Facilitate Unscrolling.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ex vivo safety and efficacy of using paired peripheral incisions to achieve a triple scroll conformation that facilitates unscrolling in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: The safety of adding paired peripheral incisions to DMEK grafts was evaluated by assessing endothelial cell loss (ECL) and risk of tearing. ECL was measured using calcein-AM staining after incisions. The risk of tearing was evaluated by comparing incision lengths before and after simulated DMEK surgery using cadaveric eyes. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing the scrolling pattern and the width of grafts with different incision lengths (0.0 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1.0 mm). Surgical unscrolling times in simulated DMEK surgery by a novice DMEK surgeon were evaluated to determine whether incisions facilitate unscrolling in DMEK surgery. RESULTS: The mean ECL after adding incisions was 0.78% ± 0.23%. There was no significant change in incision length after simulated DMEK surgery (P = 0.6). In donor grafts aged less than or equal to 65 years, 60% (6/10) achieved a stable triple scroll with 0.5 mm incisions and 80% (8/10) achieved a stable triple scroll with 1.0 mm incisions. In donor grafts aged greater than 65 years, 0% (0/4) achieved a stable triple scroll. Mean graft width increased significantly after forming a triple scroll (5575 µm ± 1128 µm) compared with baseline (1563 µm ± 428 µm) (P < 0.001). In the hands of a novice DMEK surgeon, the mean unscrolling time was significantly shorter with incisions (2.61 min ± 1.41 min) versus without incisions (5.44 min ± 3.17 min) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Paired peripheral incisions are safe and effective for inducing a triple scroll in DMEK grafts with donor age less than or equal to 65 years. Adding incisions may facilitate unscrolling for inexperienced DMEK surgeons.

Younger Donor Tissue in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery: Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To determine whether using younger donor tissue for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery influences clinical outcomes. METHODS: Scroll tightness, unscrolling time, rebubble rate, and preoperative and 3- and 6-month postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD) and endothelial cell loss (ECL) were compared for 661 DMEK grafts prepared from younger (aged younger than 50 yrs, n = 81) and older donors (aged 50 yrs or older, n = 580) with Student t test, χ2 test, or Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: There was no difference in overall unscrolling time (younger donors: 3.1 ± 3.1 min, older donor: 2.9 ± 2.7 min, P = 0.503). Experienced faculty surgeons, compared with fellows, had a significantly lower unscrolling times for both younger donors (2.4 ± 2.3 vs. 4.6 ± 3.9 min, P = 0.002) and older donors (2.5 ± 2.1 vs. 3.7 ± 3.3 min, P <0.001). Rebubble rates were not statistically different between younger (12.3%) and older donors (15.0%, P = 0.527). Three-month ECD was higher in grafts from younger compared with that in those from older donors (2138 ± 442 vs. 1974 ± 470 cells/mm2, P = 0.024). Six-month ECD was similar for younger (1972 ± 509 cells/mm2) and older donors (1947 ± 460 cells/mm2, P = 0.585). There was no difference in 3- or 6-month ECL comparing younger (3-mo: 24.3% ± 13.4%; 6-mo: 31.1% ± 15.2%) with older donors (3-mo: 25.9% ± 15.5%, P = 0.489; 6-mo: 27.8% ± 15.1%, P = 0.231). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK grafts prepared from younger donors exhibited similar unscrolling times, rebubble rates, and 3- and 6-month ECL compared with older donors. Experienced surgeons might begin to accept DMEK grafts from younger donors with confidence.

Fibrillar Layer as a Marker for Areas of Pronounced Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss in Advanced Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

PURPOSE: We sought to assess the correlation of corneal endothelial cell (CEC) density to alterations of collagen composition of Descemet membrane (DM) in advanced Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and to image such changes by slit-lamp biomicroscopy in vivo. DESIGN: Prospective, observational consecutive case series. METHODS: Fifty eyes (50 subjects) with advanced FECD were enrolled. After slit-lamp biomicroscopy and corneal Scheimpflug imaging, the Descemet endothelium complex (DEC) was retrieved during DM endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery. The expression of collagens I, III, and IV (COL I, COL III, and COL IV) and corresponding CEC density were analyzed by immunofluorescence flat mount-staining. Presence, diameter and surface area of collagen expression, and CEC density served as the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Immunofluorescence staining revealed central coherent collagen positive areas (mean surface area = 10 mm2 ± 6 mm2) corresponding to a fibrillar layer burying the guttae of DM in 84% (42/50) of DECs. CEC density overlying the fibrillar layer compared with the periphery was significantly reduced (-54.8%, P < .0001) with a steep decline of CEC density at its borders. Subgroup analysis revealed that the fibrillar layer may be imaged by slit-lamp biomicroscopy in vivo with significant positive correlation of mean maximum diameter detected by slit-lamp biomicroscopy (dSL max = 4.1 mm ± 0.9 mm) and by immunofluorescence staining (dIF max = 4.7 mm ± 1.1 mm; r = 0.76; P = .001). CONCLUSION: A fibrillar layer with a clear geographic pattern marks areas of pronounced loss of CEC density in advanced FECD eyes and may be imaged by slit-lamp biomicroscopy in vivo.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in patients with prior glaucoma surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To present outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with prior trabeculectomy or a glaucoma drainage device (GDD). METHODS: A retrospective case series, including patients that had previously undergone trabeculectomy and/or GDD implantation, who later underwent DMEK between 2013 and 2016 at Toronto Western Hospital and the Kensington Eye Institute. Outcome measures: best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell (EC) density, intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients were included. All DMEK procedures were uneventful. Mean follow-up time was 14.6 ± 6.1 months. In eyes with no visually limiting comorbidities (n = 16), BSCVA improved from 1.34 ± 0.65 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ~20/440) preoperatively to 0.51 ± 0.24 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ~20/65) and 0.50 ± 0.33 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ~20/65) at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). In eyes with visually limiting comorbidities (n = 11), BSCVA improved from 1.92 ± 0.72 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ~20/1665) preoperatively to 1.43 ± 0.83 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ~20/540) and 1.37 ± 0.99 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ~20/470) at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.008 and p = 0.037).Graft detachment rate was 24.1% and rebubble rate was 17.2%. Primary and secondary graft failure rates were 3.7% and 10.3%, respectively. Rejection rate was 17.2%. EC-loss rate at 6 months and 12 months was 36.7% and 50.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK performed in eyes with previous trabeculectomy or a GDD is more challenging than conventional DMEK, but has good outcomes. Higher rates of graft rejection and secondary graft failure in this setting should be further evaluated in long-term studies.

Optimizing Visualization of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue: Assessing the Impact of Trypan Blue Exposure on Stain Duration and Corneal Endothelial Cell Function.

PURPOSE: To assess how trypan blue staining affects Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft visibility and corneal endothelial cell (CEC) mitochondrial respiration. METHODS: DMEK grafts (n = 20) were stained with trypan blue 0.06% for 1, 3, 5, or 10 minutes. Each graft was injected into an artificial anterior chamber. Surgery was simulated with tapping and sweeping motions on the corneal surface and injections of balanced salt solution (BSS). Graft visibility was assessed at 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes. Effects of trypan blue on mitochondrial respiration were assessed using primary CECs cultured from donor corneas (n = 43). Treatment wells exposed to trypan blue 0.06% (1, 5, or 30 minutes) and donor-matched control wells to methylene blue 1% (1 minute) or BSS (1, 5, or 30 minutes) were assayed for key respiration parameters. RESULTS: After 5 minutes of surgical manipulation, grafts stained for 5 minutes were significantly more visible than grafts stained for 1 or 3 minutes; there was no added benefit of staining for 10 minutes. After 10 minutes of surgical manipulation, grafts stained for 3 minutes were more visible than grafts stained for 1 minute, without additional benefits of staining ≥5 minutes. No visibility differences were observed after ≥20 minutes of surgical manipulation. CEC mitochondrial respiration did not change significantly following trypan blue exposure for all intervals tested compared to BSS. CONCLUSIONS: Staining DMEK grafts with trypan blue for 3 to 5 minutes optimizes visibility during surgical manipulation without mitochondrial impairment. Corneal surgeons learning DMEK will benefit from optimizing this critical step.

Visian Implantable Collamer Lens Behavior in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery.

Endothelial damage is one of the leading causes for anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (AC-pIOL) explantation. In young patients, where the pIOL is explanted alone without lensectomy, an important anisometropia is left, unless an exchange with a posterior chamber (PC) pIOL is performed. However, in the event of corneal decompensation, there is no published evidence about the potential influence of a collamer-based PC-pIOL [implantable collamer lens (ICL)] on endothelial keratoplasty surgery. We report a case of severe endothelial damage after AC-pIOL implantation managed by the exchange of the AC-pIOL by an ICL, followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Collamer-based PC-pIOLs seem to not affect Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty outcomes. ICL did not show any transparency loss. These results cannot be extrapolated to other non-collamer-based PC-pIOLs. Further studies with larger samples are necessary to confirm these outcomes.

Three-Year Outcomes of Tri-Folded Endothelium-In Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty With Pull-Through Technique.

PURPOSE: To assess the 3-year outcomes of tri-folded endothelium-in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using bimanual pull-through delivery technique. DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: In this single-center study, we included 153 consecutive eyes that underwent DMEK for various indications (Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy [FECD]: n = 111; bullous keratopathy [BK]: n = 24; and failed graft: n = 18). DMEK grafts were loaded into a disposable cartridge in a tri-folded, endothelium-in configuration and delivered using bimanual pull-through technique. Main outcome measures were graft preparation and unfolding times, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and graft survival. RESULTS: Mean graft preparation time was 5.9 ± 1.1 minutes; and mean graft unfolding time was 2.9 ± 0.9 minutes. Excluding eyes with comorbidities, logarithm of minimum angle of resolution BSCVA improved significantly from baseline preoperative values of 0.92 ± 0.58 to 0.02 ± 0.07 at 1 year (P < .001) and remained stable up to 3 years. Mean postoperative ECD decreased significantly (P < .001) from eye bank values to 1,818 ± 362, 1,675 ± 372, and 1,580 ± 423 cells/mm2 at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. No significant differences in ECD were observed between eyes with FECD and BK, but ECD was significantly lower in eyes with previous failed graft (P < .05). Three-year cumulative graft survival rate was significantly (P < .001) lower for eyes with previous failed graft (71%) than for FECD (97%) and BK (92%). CONCLUSIONS: Tri-folded endothelium-in DMEK requires minimal time for graft unfolding, which is the surgical step considered most challenging by corneal surgeons. Visual outcomes and complication rates are not adversely affected by the modification of the surgical technique.

Development of a Noninvasive, Laser-Assisted Experimental Model of Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss.

Nd:YAG lasers have been used to perform noninvasive intraocular surgery, such as capsulotomy for several decades now. The incisive effect relies on the optical breakdown at the laser focus. Acoustic shock waves and cavitation bubbles are generated, causing tissue rupture. Bubble sizes and pressure amplitudes vary with pulse energy and position of the focal point. In this study, enucleated porcine eyes were positioned in front of a commercially available Nd:YAG laser. Variable pulse energies as well as different positions of the focal spots posterior to the cornea were tested. Resulting lesions were evaluated by two-photon microscopy and histology to determine the best parameters for an exclusive detachment of corneal endothelial cells (CEC) with minimum collateral damage. The advantages of this method are the precise ablation of CEC, reduced collateral damage, and above all, the non-contact treatment.