ABSTRACT
Three different types of sunitinib-loaded (SUN-loaded) nanocarriers were compared, aiming at the topical treatment of corneal neovascularization (CNV): polymeric nanospheres (NS), liposomes (LIP), and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN). Three out of eleven formulations prepared for an optimization study - the best SUN-loaded nanocarrier of each assessed type (NS, LIP, and SLN) - were selected, based on their size, polydispersity index (PdI), drug load (DL), and encapsulation efficiency (EE). These three optimal formulations were further characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, and zeta potential. In vitro SUN release profiles were obtained for the optimal formulations, along with ex vivo corneal permeability/retention studies, and ocular tolerance assays, namely: the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay, the HET-CAM test (hen's egg test - chorioallantoic membrane), and hemolytic potential (HP) assay. None of the optimal formulations exhibited toxicity or potential for ocular irritation. SLN showed higher surface fluidity, drug release more suitable for topical ocular applications, besides greater SUN corneal retention. Our results suggest that SLN are the best CNV-targeting SUN-loaded nanocarriers for clinical translation when compared to their NS and LIP analogues.
Subject(s)
Corneal Neovascularization , Nanoparticles , Nanospheres , Animals , Cattle , Female , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Sunitinib , Chickens , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Polymers , Lipids/chemistry , Drug Carriers/chemistryABSTRACT
RESUMO A ceratopigmentação teve seu primeiro registro pelo filósofo Galeno há muitos séculos como uma estratégia utilizada para o tratamento estético de pacientes com leucomas. As córneas com leucoma são patológicas e, muitas vezes, intolerantes a lentes de contato cosméticas ou próteses oculares, sendo comum a queixa de desconforto excessivo, proporcionado pela superfície corneana irregular. Assim, a ceratopigmentação é uma alternativa para a melhora estética de pacientes com opacidades corneanas. Descrevemos o caso de um paciente do sexo masculino, 39 anos, que apresentou despigmentação precoce em caso de ceratopigmentação associado a quadro de ceratite herpética necrotizante. O paciente foi submetido ao tratamento com aciclovir 2g ao dia e doxiciclina 200mg ao dia, evoluindo com melhora do quadro clínico, apesar da má adesão medicamentosa.
ABSTRACT Keratopigmentation was first recorded many centuries ago by the philosopher Galeno, as a strategy used for the aesthetic treatment of patients with leukomas. Corneas with leucoma are pathological and often intolerant of cosmetic contact lenses or ocular prostheses, with complaints of excessive discomfort provided by the irregular corneal surface being common. Therefore, keratopigmentation is an alternative for the aesthetic improvement of patients with corneal opacities. We describe the case of a 39-year old male patient, who presented early depigmentation in a case of keratopigmentation associated with necrotizing herpetic keratitis. The patient was treated with Acyclovir 2g/day and Doxycycline 200mg/day, evolving with clinical improvement, despite poor medication adherence.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Tattooing/methods , Corneal Neovascularization/etiology , Cornea/surgery , Corneal Opacity/surgery , Coloring Agents/adverse effects , Acyclovir/administration & dosage , Eye Injuries/complications , Cosmetic Techniques , Patient Satisfaction , Keratitis, Herpetic/drug therapy , Doxycycline/administration & dosage , Corneal Opacity/etiology , EstheticsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of topical cyclosporine 0.1% and bevacizumab on experimentally induced corneal neovascularization in a rat model. METHODS: A total of 30 adult Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this experimental study. The central cornea of the rats was cauterized chemically. The rats were randomly enrolled into three groups as follows: Group 1 received bevacizumab 1%, Group 2 received cyclosporine 0.1%, and Group 3 received isotonic saline twice a day for 28 days. Slit-lamp examination of all rats was performed at the 3rd and 28th day. The rats were then sacrificed, and the corneas were excised. The number of blood vessels, state of inflammation, and collagen formation were evaluated histopathologically in the corneal sections. RESULTS: Corneal opacity and edema grades were significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 3 (p=0.04 and 0.00, respectively). In the histopathological examination, Group 2 demonstrated significantly lesser number of blood vessels than Group 3 (p=0.001). Regarding collagen formation, Group 2 exhibited more regular collagen formation than Groups 1 and 3 (p=0.03). Inflammation grades were significantly lower in Groups 1 and 2 than in Group 3 (p=0.014 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Topical bevacizumab is effective in inhibiting newly formed corneal neovascularization. The topical cyclosporine 0.1% treatment appears to be more effective than the topical bevacizumab treatment.
Subject(s)
Corneal Neovascularization , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Animals , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Disease Models, Animal , Rats , Rats, Sprague-DawleyABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of topical instillation of pegaptanib sodium upon inflammatory angiogenesis induced in the rabbit cornea by alkaline cauterization. Methods: Inflammatory angiogenesis was induced by alkaline (sodium hydroxide) cauterization in the corneas of 29 male New Zealand rabbits. The animals were divided into 4 groups: a control group treated with 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium eye drops, a group treated with 1.0% prednisolone acetate eye drops, a group treated with 0.5% pegaptanib sodium diluted in 15 mL 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium, and a group treated with 1.0% pegaptanib sodium diluted in 15 mL 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium. After cauterization, eye drops were administered every 12 hours for 21 days. The animals were evaluated every 3 days after cauterization, and the newly formed vessels were quantified from photographs. The treatment effectiveness was analyzed with 3 parameters of antiangiogenic response: neovascularization area (NA), total vascular length (TVL), and number of blood vessels (BVN). Results: Average NA, TVL, and BVN values were significantly higher in both pegaptanib groups than in the prednisolone group. A nonstatistically significant reduction in parameters on days 18 and 21 was the minimum achieved in both pegaptanib groups. The efficacy of the treatments in relation to the control was significantly greater in the prednisolone group than in the 0.5% pegaptanib group or the 1.0% pegaptanib group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Topical instillation of 0.5% and 1.0% pegaptanib sodium diluted in 15 mL 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium had no inhibitory effect on corneal neovascularization in this rabbit model.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/pharmacology , Aptamers, Nucleotide/pharmacology , Inflammation/drug therapy , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Administration, Topical , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Aptamers, Nucleotide/administration & dosage , Aptamers, Nucleotide/therapeutic use , Caustics/administration & dosage , Caustics/adverse effects , Cornea/pathology , Corneal Injuries/chemically induced , Corneal Neovascularization/chemically induced , Disease Models, Animal , Inflammation/diagnosis , Instillation, Drug , Male , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Prednisolone/pharmacology , Rabbits , Sodium Hydroxide/administration & dosage , Sodium Hydroxide/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Una córnea transparente es esencial para una excelente visión; es por eso que es avascular. Pero existen condiciones que favorecen la invasión de neovasos al tejido corneal, como infecciones, inflamación, hipoxia, trauma, entre otras, que reducen la calidad visual y en algunos casos llegan hasta la pérdida de esta. La neovascularización corneal representa un problema importante de salud pública a nivel mundial. Se realizó una búsqueda automatizada con el objetivo de encontrar información actualizada sobre el tratamiento de la neovascularización corneal, para lo cual se utilizó la plataforma infomed. La información se resumió en el documento final. Sobre el tema, existe un progreso notable en el entendimiento de la patogénesis, el mejoramiento y la seguridad de los nuevos tratamientos. Los corticoesteroides y los agentes anti-VEGF (factor de crecimiento endotelial vascular) continúan siendo los medicamentos de primera línea, usados principalmente para evitar la formación de los nuevos vasos, no así para vasos maduros, donde la mejor opción son los procedimientos quirúrgicos o combinados. Se necesitan más estudios experimentales, y los ya existentes deben ser utilizados en ensayos clínicos para investigar sobre la dosis segura y los efectos secundarios, y así encontrar terapias radicales, más eficaces, que le den a los pacientes con neovascularización corneal la esperanza de una mejor calidad visual(AU)
A clear cornea is essential for excellent vision; that is why it is avascular. But there are conditions that favor the invasion of neovessels into the corneal tissue, such as infections, inflammation, hypoxia, trauma, among others, which reduce visual quality and in some cases even lose it. Corneal neovascularization represents a major public health problem worldwide. An automated search was carried out in order to find updated information on the treatment of corneal neovascularization, for which the infomed platform was used. The information was summarized in the final document. On the subject, there is notable progress in understanding the pathogenesis, improvement and safety of new treatments. Corticosteroids and anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) agents continue to be the first-line drugs, used mainly to prevent the formation of new vessels, not for mature vessels, where the best option is surgical or combined procedures. More experimental studies are needed; and the existing ones should be used in clinical trials to investigate the safe dose and side effects, and thus find radical and more effective therapies that give patients with corneal neovascularization the hope of better visual quality(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/therapeutic use , Review Literature as TopicABSTRACT
The present study aimed to demonstrate the possibility to treat corneal neovascularization using the combination of anti-VEGF injection and argon laser photocoagulation.
Subject(s)
Corneal Neovascularization , Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Argon , Corneal Neovascularization/diagnosis , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Corneal Neovascularization/etiology , Humans , Laser Coagulation , Lasers , Neovascularization, Pathologic/therapyABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to examine the expression of the cytokines and chemokines receptor-3 (CCR3) molecule in endothelial cells and vascular structures in a murine model of corneal neovascularization and in samples of neovascularized human corneas. An immunofluorescence assay using the murine model showed a greater proportion and intensity of CCR3 in the epithelium and corneal subepithelial regions in corneas with neovascularization. In the absence of vascularization, no CCR3 was found. Of the 32 studied tissues, eight were vascularized and 24 were avascular. In the human corneas, vascularized corneas showed positive labeling for CD31 in all the analzedtissues, as well as positive labeling for CCR3. Therefore, all vascularized tissues showed positive coexpression of CCR3 and CD31, whereas none of the avascular corneas showed immunolabeling for either of these receptors. These results suggest that CCR3 could be a possible marker for corneal neovascularization with potential to be a therapeutic target.
Subject(s)
Cornea/metabolism , Corneal Neovascularization/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , RNA/genetics , Receptors, CCR3/genetics , Animals , Cornea/pathology , Corneal Neovascularization/metabolism , Corneal Neovascularization/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Receptors, CCR3/biosynthesisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate recent in vivo studies on emerging therapies for managing corneal epithelial injuries. METHODS: The search was conducted on PubMed for articles published between January 2015 and September 2019 and in English language. RESULTS: Thirty studies were identified for evaluation, including those on mesenchymal stem cells, amniotic membrane-derived therapies, endogenous peptides and their inhibitors, as well as hydrogel therapies. Intermediate to strong levels of evidence are presented regarding the use of these strategies on chemically injured cornea, including their effects on healing of corneal epithelial defect, anti-inflammatory properties, prevention of corneal neovascularization, as well as restoration of anatomy and functions of the anterior eye, although clinical trials are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of these strategies on humans. CONCLUSION: Recent advances and understanding in various novel therapeutic methods for corneal epithelial chemical injuries should provide potential alternatives to current standard treatment regimens and help reduce risks of complications, hence improve patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Corneal Injuries , Corneal Neovascularization , Cornea , Humans , Wound HealingABSTRACT
Corneal neovascularization (CNV) is a common sight-threatening pathology that can be induced by a variety of inflammatory and angiogenic stimuli. Current CNV treatments include anti-inflammatory drugs and antibody-based inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). However, these are not always effective and novel therapeutic approaches are needed. Previous work has indicated a role for nucleolin (NCL) in VEGF-mediated neoangiogenesis in a suture-induced CNV model. The major goal for this current study is to test the effect of AS1411, a NCL-binding DNA aptamer that has reached human clinical trials, on neovascularization in a murine model of VEGF-mediated CNV. Our results show that topical administration of AS1411 can significantly inhibit corneal neovascularization in this model. Mechanistic studies indicate that AS1411 reduces the VEGF-stimulated proliferation, migration, and tube formation of primary cells obtained from human limbus stroma (HLSC). AS1411 treatment also significantly reduced VEGF-stimulated induction of miR-21 and miR-221 in HLSC, suggesting a role for these pro-angiogenic miRNAs in mediating the effects of AS1411 in this system. In sum, this new research further supports a role for NCL in the molecular etiology of CNV and identifies AS1411 as a potential anti-angiogenic CNV treatment that works by a novel mechanism of action.
Subject(s)
Cornea/pathology , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides/pharmacology , Animals , Aptamers, Nucleotide , Cell Movement , Cell Proliferation , Cells, Cultured , Cornea/drug effects , Corneal Neovascularization/metabolism , Corneal Neovascularization/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB CABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of metronidazole ophthalmic solutions on corneal neovascularization (CNV) in a rat model. METHODS: A chemical burn was created in the right central cornea of 40 rats. Animals were randomized and distributed into four study groups (n = 10 rats per group) designated Met_0.1%, Met_0.5%, sham, and untreated groups. Chemical-burned corneas in the Met_0.1% and Met_0.5% groups received ophthalmic solutions of 0.1 and 0.5% metronidazole, respectively. Corneas in the sham group received phosphate-buffered saline (metronidazole diluent). All treated eyes received ophthalmic solution at intervals of 6 h, for up to 30 days. Untreated corneas received no treatment. CNV was evaluated postinjury using corneal photographs at different evaluation time points. The main CNV outcome measures were: burn intensity, index of CNV, and percentage of vascularized corneal area. Five rats from each group were euthanized, on days 15 and 30; the samples were collected for histological analyses. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: CNV was observed in the eyes from day 7 postinjury. However, the indices of CNV for the Met_0.1% and Met_0.5% groups were smaller than those for the sham and untreated groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, corneas treated with 0.1 or 0.5% metronidazole had smaller vascularized areas compared to control corneas. On histological study, the presence of blood vessels confirmed clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Regular instillation of 0.1 or 0.5% metronidazole had a significant inhibitory effect for CNV on chemical burns induced in a rat model.
Subject(s)
Cornea/pathology , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Metronidazole/administration & dosage , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Burns, Chemical/complications , Cornea/drug effects , Corneal Neovascularization/etiology , Corneal Neovascularization/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Eye Burns/complications , Follow-Up Studies , Male , Ophthalmic Solutions , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Purpose: The aims of this study were (1) to determine the efficacy of adenovirus vector serotype 5 (Ad) encoding human soluble VEGF receptor 1 (s-VEGFR1) gene transfer to the lacrimal gland (LG); (2) to investigate whether expression of s-VEGFR1 prevents corneal neovascularization (CNV) induced by alkali burns; and (3) to evaluate the safety of the procedure. Methods: AdVEGFR1 vectors (25 µL, 1 × 1010 pfu/mL) were injected in the right LGs of rats and were compared with AdNull vector (25 µL, 1 × 1010 pfu/mL) or 25 µL of saline (Control) before cornea alkali burns with 1 M NaOH. After 7 days, CNV was documented at the slit lamp. Tear secretion was measured with phenol red threads. The animals were tested for s-VEGFR1 mRNA and protein in the LG by quantitative (q)PCR and immunohistochemistry staining, respectively. qPCR was used to compare the mRNA levels of IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α in the LG and ipsilateral trigeminal ganglion (TG). Results: Ad-VEGFR1 transfected 83% (10/12) of the rats. VEGFR1 was present in LG acinar cells. CNV was prevented in 9 of 12 animals in the Ad-VEGFR1 group, compared with the Ad-Null (3:10) and Control groups (1:10) (P = 0.0317). The tear secretion and cytokine mRNA levels in the LG and TG were similar in all three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Adenoviral vector gene transfer was safe for LG structure and function. The LG as the target tissue showed local expression of human s-VEGFR1, and CNV was prevented in most of the eyes exposed to alkali burns.
Subject(s)
Adenoviridae/genetics , Corneal Neovascularization/prevention & control , Genetic Therapy , Genetic Vectors , Lacrimal Apparatus/metabolism , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1/genetics , Animals , Burns, Chemical/prevention & control , Corneal Neovascularization/chemically induced , Cytokines/metabolism , Eye Burns/chemically induced , Gene Expression , Humans , Male , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sodium Hydroxide , Transfection , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/metabolismABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The objective is to analyze the antiangiogenic mechanism of suramab, a pharmaceutical compound of bevacizumab and suramin, in a rabbit model of corneal angiogenesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Corneal neovascularization was induced in four groups of six New Zealand White rabbits by applying a filter paper disk soaked in 1 M Na (OH) on the central cornea. Group one was treated after injury with intravenous suramab at a dose equivalent to 3 mg/kg of bevacizumab and 10 mg/kg of suramin. Group two was treated with intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg). Group three was treated with 10 mg/kg of suramin while the control group received no treatment. Digital photographs were taken at days 9, 15, 21, and 35. Neovessel formation was quantified giving a 0-4 score to each quadrant according to the centripetal growth of the longest vessel (neovessel index, NVI). Animals were sacrificed at day 35. Corneas were processed for histology, immunohistochemistry, and Western-blot using primary antibodies against P2X2, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), LYVE-1, PECAM-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A). RESULTS: Suramab significantly reduced neovessel growth (mean NVI: 4.2) compared to bevacizumab (8.4), suramin (7.22), and control animals (12.2) at 35 days post-injury (p < 0.01). A lower protein expression of P2X2, bFGF, LYVE-1, PECAM-1, and VEGF-A was found in the cornea of suramab animals than in the other groups of animals. CONCLUSIONS: Joint downregulation of bFGF, P2X2, bFGF, and LYVE-1 constitutes a mechanism that induces greater and longer inhibition of corneal angiogenesis. Results might be relevant to ophthalmic care. Ocular administration of suramab is currently being investigated.
Subject(s)
Bevacizumab/pharmacology , Cornea/pathology , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Fibroblast Growth Factor 2/biosynthesis , Receptors, Purinergic P2X2/biosynthesis , Suramin/pharmacology , Animals , Blotting, Western , Cornea/metabolism , Corneal Neovascularization/metabolism , Corneal Neovascularization/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Combinations , Immunohistochemistry , RabbitsABSTRACT
Purpose: To investigate the effect of naringenin eye drops in corneal neovascularization induced by alkali (1 N NaOH) burn in mice. Methods: Corneal neovascularization in the right eye of male Swiss mice was induced by alkali. Treatment with naringenin eye drops (0.08-80 µg; 8 µL of 0.01-10 g/L solution) or vehicle (saline) started 2 days before corneal neovascularization was induced and was performed twice a day. Mice were treated up until the time animals were euthanized and cornea tissue was collected for testing, which was 2, 4, and 6 hours after alkali stimulus for cytokine and antioxidant capacity measurements, and 3 and/or 7 days after alkali stimulus for the assessment of corneal epithelial thickness and neovascularization, neutrophil, and macrophage recruitment, and vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf), platelet-derived growth factor (Pdgf), matrix metalloproteinase-14 (Mmp14), and pigment epithelium-derived factor (Pedf) mRNA expression. Results: Naringenin eye drops inhibited alkali burn-induced neutrophil (myeloperoxidase activity and recruitment of Lysm-GFP+ cells) and macrophage (N-acetyl-ß-D glucosaminidase activity) recruitment into the eye, decrease in epithelial thickness, and neovascularization in the cornea. Further, naringenin inhibited alkali-induced cytokine (IL-1ß and IL-6) production, Vegf, Pdgf, and Mmp14 mRNA expression, and the reduction of ferric reducing antioxidant power and Azinobis-(3-Ethylbenzothiazoline 6-Sulfonic acid) radical scavenging capacity as well as increased the reduced glutathione and protein-bound sulfhydryl groups levels. Conclusions: Collectively, these results indicate that naringenin eye drops are protective in alkali-induced corneal burn by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment, the proangiogenic factor expression, inflammatory cytokine production, and loss of antioxidant defenses.
Subject(s)
Antioxidants/metabolism , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Cytokines/metabolism , Epithelium, Corneal/metabolism , Flavanones/administration & dosage , Alkalies/toxicity , Animals , Burns, Chemical/complications , Corneal Neovascularization/metabolism , Corneal Neovascularization/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Epithelium, Corneal/drug effects , Epithelium, Corneal/pathology , Estrogen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Eye Burns/chemically induced , Male , Mice , Microscopy, Confocal , Ophthalmic SolutionsABSTRACT
PURPOSE:: To establish and compare protocols of alkaline cauterization for inducing corneal angiogenesis in murine models. METHODS:: Twenty-four adult Wistar rats were distributed into four groups (G1, G2, G3, and G4). The right eye cornea from each rat was cauterized using filter paper (3 mm), soaked in a solution of silver and potassium nitrates (3:1). Cauterization times were 10 (G1 and G4), or 20 seconds (G2 and G3). Cauterized corneas were washed with Ringer's lactate solution. The filter paper was either removed before washing (G1 and G2), or kept on the corneas (G3 and G4). Corneas were photographed at multiple time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, and 15 days after the procedure), and neovascularization parameters were assayed. RESULTS:: Neovascularization was observed in 66% of G1 corneas, and 100% of G2, G3, and G4 corneas. On day 15, G1 corneas showed smaller vascularized areas (12.63 ± 12.59%) compared to those in the G3 (41.95 ± 17.32%) and G4 (33 ± 11.74%) (P < 0.05) groups. CONCLUSIONS:: The silver and potassium nitrate solution effectively induced corneal angiogenesis. The G2, G3, and G4 protocols showed excellent reproducibility, and induced vascularization in 100% of corneas.
Subject(s)
Cautery/methods , Corneal Neovascularization/etiology , Disease Models, Animal , Neovascularization, Pathologic/etiology , Nitrates , Potassium Compounds , Silver , Animals , Cornea/blood supply , Cornea/surgery , Male , Rats, Wistar , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE:: To evaluate and compare the effects of topical application and subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab on corneal neovascularization (CNV) in rabbits' eyes after chemical burning of the cornea. METHODS:: The animals were randomly distributed into four groups of five animals. In one group, the drug was instilled, while in another, it was administered by subconjunctival injection. The two procedures using bevacizumab were compared with instillation and subconjunctival injection of saline solution (S). Neovascularization was evaluated according to the size of the invasion area of new blood vessels and through computerized analysis of this area. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's test for two-by-two comparison of the groups, to assess the external examination of CNV. Analysis of variance was used to assess the area of CNV. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:: Assessing both the external examination and the invasion area of neovessels on the 5th and 10th days, there was a clear difference between the groups. The group to which saline solution had been applied showed higher scores for CNV, as well as increases in the invasion area of neovessels. Two-by-two comparison of groups revealed no significant differences. However, an analysis of the factors involved (injection vs. instillation and bevacizumab vs. saline solution) showed that injection did not differ from instillation, but that bevacizumab differed from saline solution. CONCLUSION:: Bevacizumab showed an inhibitory effect on CNV in rabbits' eyes after chemical burning of the cornea. There was no difference between the topical or subconjunctival administration of bevacizumab in the inhibition of CNV.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Cornea/drug effects , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Animals , Burns, Chemical , Cornea/innervation , Corneal Injuries/chemically induced , Corneal Neovascularization/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Eye Burns , Injections, Intraocular , Male , Ophthalmic Solutions , Rabbits , Random Allocation , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate and compare the effects of topical application and subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab on corneal neovascularization (CNV) in rabbits' eyes after chemical burning of the cornea. Methods: The animals were randomly distributed into four groups of five animals. In one group, the drug was instilled, while in another, it was administered by subconjunctival injection. The two procedures using bevacizumab were compared with instillation and subconjunctival injection of saline solution (S). Neovascularization was evaluated according to the size of the invasion area of new blood vessels and through computerized analysis of this area. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's test for two-by-two comparison of the groups, to assess the external examination of CNV. Analysis of variance was used to assess the area of CNV. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Assessing both the external examination and the invasion area of neovessels on the 5th and 10th days, there was a clear difference between the groups. The group to which saline solution had been applied showed higher scores for CNV, as well as increases in the invasion area of neovessels. Two-by-two comparison of groups revealed no significant differences. However, an analysis of the factors involved (injection vs. instillation and bevacizumab vs. saline solution) showed that injection did not differ from instillation, but that bevacizumab differed from saline solution. Conclusion: Bevacizumab showed an inhibitory effect on CNV in rabbits' eyes after chemical burning of the cornea. There was no difference between the topical or subconjunctival administration of bevacizumab in the inhibition of CNV.
RESUMO Objetivos: Avaliar e comparar o efeito do uso tópico e da injeção subconjuntival do bevacizumabe na neovascularização corneana de olhos de coelhos após queimadura química. Métodos: Os animais foram distribuídos de forma aleatória em quatro grupos de cinco animais. Em um grupo de coelhos a droga foi instilada, enquanto em outro foi aplicada injeção subconjuntival, sendo os dois procedimentos comparados com a instilação e injeção subconjuntival de soro fisiológico 0,9% (SF) e entre si. A neovascularização foi avaliada conforme o tamanho da área de invasão dos neovasos e com análise computadorizada da mesma. Na análise de dados aplicou-se o teste de Kruskal-Wallis seguido do teste de Dunn com p<0,05 para comparação dos grupos dois a dois na análise do exame externo da neovascularização corneana. Na análise da área de neovascularização corneana, aplicou-se o teste F de análise de variância. A significância estatística foi definida como valor de p<0.05. Resultados: A avaliação do exame externo e da área de invasão de neovasos, no 5º e 10º dia, mostrou nítida diferença entre os grupos. Com o uso de soro fisiológico houve maior graduação na escala de neovascularização corneana e também na área de invasão dos nevasos, o que demonstrou o efeito inibitório do bevacizumabe. Nas comparações dos grupos dois a dois não foram detectadas diferenças significativas, porém, ao analisar os fatores envolvidos (procedimentos: injeção ou instilação, e as drogas: bevacizumabe ou soro fisiológico), verificou-se que a injeção não diferiu da instilação, mas o bevacizumabe diferiu do soro fisiológico. Conclusão: O bevacizumabe apresentou efeito inibitório na neovascularização corneana de olhos de coelhos após queimadura química, tanto por via tópica como por via subconjuntival e não houve diferença entre a via tópica e a via subconjuntival de administração do bevacizumabe na inibição da neovascularização corneana.
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rats , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Cornea/drug effects , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Ophthalmic Solutions , Burns, Chemical , Random Allocation , Eye Burns , Administration, Topical , Corneal Neovascularization/pathology , Cornea/innervation , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors/antagonists & inhibitors , Disease Models, Animal , Injections, Intraocular , Corneal Injuries/chemically inducedABSTRACT
Abstract Purpose: To establish and compare protocols of alkaline cauterization for inducing corneal angiogenesis in murine models. Methods: Twenty-four adult Wistar rats were distributed into four groups (G1, G2, G3, and G4). The right eye cornea from each rat was cauterized using filter paper (3 mm), soaked in a solution of silver and potassium nitrates (3:1). Cauterization times were 10 (G1 and G4), or 20 seconds (G2 and G3). Cauterized corneas were washed with Ringer's lactate solution. The filter paper was either removed before washing (G1 and G2), or kept on the corneas (G3 and G4). Corneas were photographed at multiple time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, and 15 days after the procedure), and neovascularization parameters were assayed. Results: Neovascularization was observed in 66% of G1 corneas, and 100% of G2, G3, and G4 corneas. On day 15, G1 corneas showed smaller vascularized areas (12.63 ± 12.59%) compared to those in the G3 (41.95 ± 17.32%) and G4 (33 ± 11.74%) (P < 0.05) groups. Conclusions: The silver and potassium nitrate solution effectively induced corneal angiogenesis. The G2, G3, and G4 protocols showed excellent reproducibility, and induced vascularization in 100% of corneas.
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Cautery/methods , Corneal Neovascularization/etiology , Potassium Compounds , Disease Models, Animal , Neovascularization, Pathologic/etiology , Nitrates , Reference Values , Time Factors , Reproducibility of Results , Rats, Wistar , Cornea/surgery , Cornea/blood supplyABSTRACT
Purpose: To establish and compare protocols of alkaline cauterization for inducing corneal angiogenesis in murine models. Methods: Twenty-four adult Wistar rats were distributed into four groups (G1, G2, G3, and G4). The right eye cornea from each rat was cauterized using filter paper (3 mm), soaked in a solution of silver and potassium nitrates (3:1). Cauterization times were 10 (G1 and G4), or 20 seconds (G2 and G3). Cauterized corneas were washed with Ringers lactate solution. The filter paper was either removed before washing (G1 and G2), or kept on the corneas (G3 and G4). Corneas were photographed at multiple time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, and 15 days after the procedure), and neovascularization parameters were assayed. Results: Neovascularization was observed in 66% of G1 corneas, and 100% of G2, G3, and G4 corneas. On day 15, G1 corneas showed smaller vascularized areas (12.63 ± 12.59%) compared to those in the G3 (41.95 ± 17.32%) and G4 (33 ± 11.74%) (P 0.05) groups. Conclusions: The silver and potassium nitrate solution effectively induced corneal angiogenesis. The G2, G3, and G4 protocols showed excellent reproducibility, and induced vascularization in 100% of corneas.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Rats , Murinae/abnormalities , Murinae/blood , Murinae/injuries , Cautery/veterinary , Corneal Neovascularization , RatsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the antiangiogenic activity of bevacizumab-loaded polyurethane using two animal models of neovascularization. METHODS: The percentage of blood vessels was evaluated in a chicken chorioallantoic membrane model (n=42) and in the rabbit cornea (n=24) with neovascularization induced by alkali injury. In each model, the animals were randomly divided into the groups treated with the bevacizumab-loaded polyurethane device, phosphate-buffered-saline (negative control) and bevacizumab commercial solution (positive control). Clinical examination, as well as histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation, were performed in the rabbit eyes. Microvascular density in hot spot areas was determined in semi-thin sections of corneal tissue by hematoxylin-eosin staining and factor VIII immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemical analysis was also performed to evaluate VEGF expression. RESULTS: In the evaluated models, the use of bevacizumab (Avastin®) and the bevacizumab-loaded polyurethane device led to similar results with regard to inhibition of neovascularization. In the chorioallantoic membrane model, the bevacizumab-loaded polyurethane device reduced angiogenesis by 50.27% when compared to the negative control group. In the rabbit model of corneal neovascularization, the mean density of vessels/field was reduced by 46.87% on analysis of factor VIII immunohistochemistry photos in the bevacizumab-loaded polyurethane device group as compared to the negative control (PBS) sections. In both models, no significant difference could be identified between the bevacizumab-loaded polyurethane device and the positive control group, leading to similar results with regard to inhibition of neovascularization. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the bevacizumab-loaded polyurethane device may release bevacizumab and inhibit neovascularization similarly to commercial bevacizumab solution in the short-term.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Drug Carriers/chemistry , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Polyurethanes , Animals , Chick Embryo , Corneal Neovascularization/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Compounding , Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Drug Implants/chemistry , Female , Polyurethanes/chemistry , RabbitsABSTRACT
CONTEXTO CLÍNICO: Se denomina glaucoma a un grupo de enfermedades oculares caracterizadas habitualmente por un daño en el nervio óptico, frecuentemente asociado a una presión intraocular (PIO) elevada. Constituye la segunda causa de ceguera en el mundo luego de las cataratas. Existen formas primarias idiopáticas y formas secundarias que pueden deberse a uveítis, trauma, terapia con glucocorticoides, o retinopatías vasoproliferativas. El glaucoma de ángulo abierto, se caracteriza por una pérdida progresiva del campo visual. Su prevalencia es inferior al 1% en los individuos menores de 55 años de edad y alcanza el 4% a los 80 años de edad. El diagnóstico se realiza habitualmente mediante la visualización del nervio óptico con el fondo de ojo para evaluar la neuropatía. También se recurre a estúdios funcionales como el campo visual computarizado. El glaucoma de ángulo estrecho ocurre en pacientes con cierta predisposición anatómica. Entre las causas secundarias se encuentran la proliferación vascular del iris, que puede observarse en retinopatías proliferativas como la retinopatía diabética, y que se denomina glaucoma neovascular (GNV). El tratamiento del glaucoma de ángulo abierto en primera instancia es de tipo farmacológico tópico, luego terapia fotodinámica (TFD) y por último cirugía, que puede consistir en uma técnica denominada trabeculectomía y tratamiento combinado con mitomicina c para evitar la cicatrización. TECNOLOGÍA: El bevacizumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal recombinante que bloquea la interacción entre el VEGF-A y sus receptores (VEGF-1 y VEGF-2), inhibiendo la formación de nuevos vasos sanguíneos. Para el tratamiento del GNV, el bevacizumab se administra en forma intravítrea, y para el tratamiento de la NVC se administra en forma tópica, subconjuntival, o intraocular. La dosis para tratamiento de glaucoma neovascular es 1,25 mg administrado por inyección intravítrea una vez al mes. Ranibizumab es el fragmento Fab del mismo anticuerpo utilizado para crear bevacizumab, pero se une al VEGF-A con afinidad significativamente mayor. Al igual que el bevacizumab, inhibe la formación de nuevos vasos sanguíneos. Los efectos secundarios más comunes son la hemorragia conjuntival, dolor ocular, flotadores vítreos, aumento de la PIO e inflamación intraocular. Se recomienda una dosis de 0,5 mg administrada en forma intravítrea, una vez al mes para el tratamiento del glaucoma neovascular. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la evidencia disponible acerca de la eficacia, seguridad y aspectos relacionados a las políticas de cobertura de Inhibidores de la angiogénesis (bevacizumab y ranibizumab) en GNV y la NVC. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas (incluyendo Medline, Cochrane y CRD), en buscadores genéricos de Internet, agencias de evaluación de tecnologias sanitarias y financiadores de salud utilizando las siguientes estrategias: (Glaucoma, Neovascular[Mesh] OR Glaucom*[tiab]) AND (Bevacizumab[Mesh] OR Bevacizumab[tiab] OR Avastin[tiab] OR Ranibizumab[Mesh] OR RhuFab[tiab] OR Ranibizumab[tiab] OR Lucentis[tiab]). (Corneal Neovascularization[Mesh] OR Corneal Neovasculari*[tiab] OR Corneal Angiogenesis[tiab]) AND (Bevacizumab[Mesh] OR Bevacizumab[tiab] OR Avastin[tiab] OR Ranibizumab[Mesh] OR RhuFab[tiab] OR Ranibizumab[tiab] OR Lucentis[tiab]). Se priorizó la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas (RS), ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados (ECAs), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias y económicas, guías de práctica clínica y políticas de cobertura de otros sistemas de salud cuando estaban disponibles. RESULTADOS: En relación al tratamiento del glaucoma neovascular se incluyeron dos RS, un ensayo clínico no aleatorizado, una serie de casos, una evaluación de tecnología sanitaria y dos políticas de cobertura. En relación al tratamiento de la neovascularización corneal se incluyeron una RS, un ECA, uma guía de práctica clínica y dos políticas de cobertura. CONCLUSIONES: Evidencia de moderada calidad muestra que el bevacizumab comparado con placebo podría tener cierta efectividad para reducir la presión intraocular en pacientes con glaucoma neovascular, aunque los datos son inciertos. Al compararlo con mitomicina c como adyuvante de la cirugía de trabeculectomía, no se observaron diferencias significativas en cuanto a la disminución de la presión intraocular. Evidencia de baja calidad indica que el ranibizumab no produciría cambios significativos en la presión intraocular al aplicarlo en pacientes con glaucoma neovascular. Las guías de práctica clínica relevadas consideran al bevacizumab como una opción entre otras como la terapia fotodinámica o la cirugía. No se encontraron guías que recomienden el uso de ranibizumab. Los financiadores estadounidenses relevados brindan cobertura del bevacizumab a pacientes con glaucoma neovascular. Sólo una de ellas brinda cobertura de ranibizumab para esta indicación. En cuanto al tratamiento de la neovascularización corneal, evidencia de muy baja calidad muestra que el bevacizumab podría reducir el área de neovascularización, aunque no necesariamente esto se traduciría en beneficios clínicos concretos, y no demostró ser superior a otras alternativas terapéuticas como la terapia fotodinámica. No se encontraron estudios que comparasen ranibizumab con los tratamientos habituales. Por estos motivos las guías de práctica clínica no suelen considerarlo como una alternativa y los financiadores de salud estadounidenses relevados no prestan cobertura por considerar estos tratamientos como experimentales.