Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Trends Hear ; 22: 2331216518805690, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30353784

ABSTRACT

Aversiveness of loud sounds is a frequent complaint by hearing aid users, especially when fitted bilaterally. This study investigates whether loudness summation can be held responsible for this finding. Two aspects of loudness summation should be taken into account: spectral loudness summation for broadband signals and binaural loudness summation for signals that are presented binaurally. In this study, the effect of different symmetrical hearing losses was studied. Measurements were obtained with the widely used technique of Adaptive Categorical Loudness Scaling. For large bandwidths, spectral loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners was found to be greater than that for normal-hearing listeners, both for monaurally and binaurally presented signals. For binaural loudness summation, the effect of hearing loss was not significant. In all cases, individual differences were substantial.


Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing , Loudness Perception , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Acoustic Stimulation , Aged , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Case-Control Studies , Correction of Hearing Impairment/adverse effects , Electric Stimulation , Equipment Design , Female , Hearing Aids/adverse effects , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/psychology , Humans , Male , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
2.
J Laryngol Otol ; 131(8): 667-670, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28625187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The percutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device can be associated with more soft tissue complications when compared to the magnetic transcutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device. This study aimed to determine whether fewer soft tissue complications may result in the transcutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device being a lower cost option in hearing rehabilitation. METHODS: This retrospective case note review included adult patients who underwent implantation with the transcutaneous Cochlear Attract (n = 22) or percutaneous Cochlear DermaLock (n = 25) bone-anchored hearing aids between September 2013 and December 2014. The number of post-operative clinic appointments, complications and treatments undertaken, and calculated cost average, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Although the transcutaneous device was slightly more expensive than the percutaneous device, the percutaneous device was associated with a greater number of soft tissue complications and, as a result, the percutaneous device had significantly higher follow-up costs in the first six months following surgery. CONCLUSION: The transcutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device may represent a more cost-effective method of hearing rehabilitation compared to the percutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adult , Aged , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/economics , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/economics , Correction of Hearing Impairment/adverse effects , Correction of Hearing Impairment/economics , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osseointegration , Postoperative Complications/economics , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Trials ; 18(1): 47, 2017 01 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28129779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss (HL) is a disability associated with poorer health-related quality of life including an increased risk for loneliness, isolation, functional fitness declines, falls, hospitalization and premature mortality. The purpose of this pilot trial is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel intervention to reduce loneliness, improve functional fitness, social connectedness, hearing and health-related quality of life in older adults with HL. METHODS: This 10-week, single-blind, pilot randomized control trial (RCT) will include a convenience sample of ambulatory adults aged 65 years or older with self-reported HL. Following baseline assessments, participants will be randomized to either intervention (exercise, health education, socialization and group auditory rehabilitation (GAR)) or control (GAR only) groups. The intervention group will attend a local YMCA twice a week and the control group once a week. Intervention sessions will include 45 min of strengthening, balance and resistance exercises, 30 min of group walking at a self-selected pace and 60 min of interactive health education or GAR. The control group will attend 60-min GAR sessions. GAR sessions will include education about hearing, hearing technologies, enhancing communication skills, and psychosocial support. Pre-post trial data collection and measures will include: functional fitness (gait speed, 30-s Sit to Stand Test), hearing and health-related quality of life, loneliness, depression, social participation and social support. At trial end, feasibility (recruitment, randomization, retention, acceptability) and GAR will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: Despite evidence suggesting that HL is associated with declines in functional fitness, there are no studies aimed at addressing functional fitness declines associated with the disability of HL. This pilot trial will provide knowledge about the physical, mental and social impacts on health related to HL as a disability. This will inform the feasibility of a larger RCT and preliminary evidence about the initial effects of a novel, community-based, holistic intervention addressing both the negative psychosocial and functional physical effects of HL among older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02662192 . Registered on 14 January 2016.


Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Exercise Therapy , Group Processes , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Physical Fitness , Quality of Life , Walking , Age Factors , Aged , Correction of Hearing Impairment/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/psychology , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Loneliness , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Pilot Projects , Research Design , Risk Factors , Single-Blind Method , Social Behavior , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Trends Hear ; 182014 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25361601

ABSTRACT

The signal processing and fitting methods used for hearing aids have mainly been designed to optimize the intelligibility of speech. Little attention has been paid to the effectiveness of hearing aids for listening to music. Perhaps as a consequence, many hearing-aid users complain that they are not satisfied with their hearing aids when listening to music. This issue inspired the Internet-based survey presented here. The survey was designed to identify the nature and prevalence of problems associated with listening to live and reproduced music with hearing aids. Responses from 523 hearing-aid users to 21 multiple-choice questions are presented and analyzed, and the relationships between responses to questions regarding music and questions concerned with information about the respondents, their hearing aids, and their hearing loss are described. Large proportions of the respondents reported that they found their hearing aids to be helpful for listening to both live and reproduced music, although less so for the former. The survey also identified problems such as distortion, acoustic feedback, insufficient or excessive gain, unbalanced frequency response, and reduced tone quality. The results indicate that the enjoyment of listening to music with hearing aids could be improved by an increase of the input and output dynamic range, extension of the low-frequency response, and improvement of feedback cancellation and automatic gain control systems.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing Aids , Music , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/adverse effects , Equipment Design , Hearing Aids/adverse effects , Humans , Internet , Patient Satisfaction , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Int J Audiol ; 53(2): 121-7, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24304359

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the intracochlear electrode position on the residual hearing and VNG- and cVEMP responses. DESIGN: Prospective pilot study. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirteen adult patients who underwent unilateral cochlear implant surgery were examined with high-resolution rotational tomography after cochlear implantation. All subjects were also tested with VNG, and 12 of the subjects were tested with cVEMP and audiometry before and after surgery. RESULTS: We found that although the electrode was originally planned to be positioned inside the scala tympani, only 8 of 13 had full insertion into the scala tympani. Loss of cVEMP response occurred to the same extent in the group with full scala tympani positioning and the group with scala vestibuli involvement. There was a non-significant difference in the loss of caloric response and residual hearing between the two groups. Interscalar dislocation of the electrode inside the cochlea was observed in two patients. A higher loss of residual hearing could be seen in the group with electrode dislocation between the scalae. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that intracochlear electrode dislocation is a possible cause to loss of residual hearing during cochlear implantation but cannot be the sole cause of postoperative vestibular loss.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/methods , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Hearing Disorders/therapy , Hearing , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Scala Tympani/physiopathology , Scala Vestibuli/physiopathology , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology , Adult , Audiometry , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Correction of Hearing Impairment/adverse effects , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Female , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Hearing Disorders/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nystagmus, Physiologic , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Prosthesis Design , Scala Tympani/diagnostic imaging , Scala Vestibuli/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials , Vestibule, Labyrinth/diagnostic imaging , Video Recording
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...