Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 291
Filter
1.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241260029, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831646

ABSTRACT

The extent to which active noise cancelation (ANC), when combined with hearing assistance, can improve speech intelligibility in noise is not well understood. One possible source of benefit is ANC's ability to reduce the sound level of the direct (i.e., vent-transmitted) path. This reduction lowers the "floor" imposed by the direct path, thereby allowing any increases to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) created in the amplified path to be "realized" at the eardrum. Here we used a modeling approach to estimate this benefit. We compared pairs of simulated hearing aids that differ only in terms of their ability to provide ANC and computed intelligibility metrics on their outputs. The difference in metric scores between simulated devices is termed the "ANC Benefit." These simulations show that ANC Benefit increases as (1) the environmental sound level increases, (2) the ability of the hearing aid to improve SNR increases, (3) the strength of the ANC increases, and (4) the hearing loss severity decreases. The predicted size of the ANC Benefit can be substantial. For a moderate hearing loss, the model predicts improvement in intelligibility metrics of >30% when environments are moderately loud (>70 dB SPL) and devices are moderately capable of increasing SNR (by >4 dB). It appears that ANC can be a critical ingredient in hearing devices that attempt to improve SNR in loud environments. ANC will become more and more important as advanced SNR-improving algorithms (e.g., artificial intelligence speech enhancement) are included in hearing devices.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Noise , Perceptual Masking , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Computer Simulation , Acoustic Stimulation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Equipment Design , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
2.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241256721, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773778

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the role of hearing aid (HA) usage in language outcomes among preschool children aged 3-5 years with mild bilateral hearing loss (MBHL). The data were retrieved from a total of 52 children with MBHL and 30 children with normal hearing (NH). The association between demographical, audiological factors and language outcomes was examined. Analyses of variance were conducted to compare the language abilities of HA users, non-HA users, and their NH peers. Furthermore, regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of language outcomes. Aided better ear pure-tone average (BEPTA) was significantly correlated with language comprehension scores. Among children with MBHL, those who used HA outperformed the ones who did not use HA across all linguistic domains. The language skills of children with MBHL were comparable to those of their peers with NH. The degree of improvement in audibility in terms of aided BEPTA was a significant predictor of language comprehension. It is noteworthy that 50% of the parents expressed reluctance regarding HA use for their children with MBHL. The findings highlight the positive impact of HA usage on language development in this population. Professionals may therefore consider HAs as a viable treatment option for children with MBHL, especially when there is a potential risk of language delay due to hearing loss. It was observed that 25% of the children with MBHL had late-onset hearing loss. Consequently, the implementation of preschool screening or a listening performance checklist is recommended to facilitate early detection.


Subject(s)
Child Language , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Bilateral , Language Development , Humans , Male , Child, Preschool , Female , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/psychology , Speech Perception , Case-Control Studies , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Comprehension , Hearing , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Age Factors , Auditory Threshold , Language Tests
3.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241253653, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715401

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to preliminarily investigate the associations between performance on the integrated Digit-in-Noise Test (iDIN) and performance on measures of general cognition and working memory (WM). The study recruited 81 older adult hearing aid users between 60 and 95 years of age with bilateral moderate to severe hearing loss. The Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic (MoCA-BC) was used to screen older adults for mild cognitive impairment. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured using 2- to 5-digit sequences of the Mandarin iDIN. The differences in SRT between five-digit and two-digit sequences (SRT5-2), and between five-digit and three-digit sequences (SRT5-3), were used as indicators of memory performance. The results were compared to those from the Digit Span Test and Corsi Blocks Tapping Test, which evaluate WM and attention capacity. SRT5-2 and SRT5-3 demonstrated significant correlations with the three cognitive function tests (rs ranging from -.705 to -.528). Furthermore, SRT5-2 and SRT5-3 were significantly higher in participants who failed the MoCA-BC screening compared to those who passed. The findings show associations between performance on the iDIN and performance on memory tests. However, further validation and exploration are needed to fully establish its effectiveness and efficacy.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Cognitive Dysfunction , Hearing Aids , Memory, Short-Term , Humans , Aged , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Noise/adverse effects , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech Reception Threshold Test , Age Factors , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/psychology , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Memory , Acoustic Stimulation , Predictive Value of Tests , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Auditory Threshold
4.
Hear Res ; 448: 109026, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776706

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implants are medical devices that have restored hearing to approximately one million people around the world. Outcomes are impressive and most recipients attain excellent speech comprehension in quiet without relying on lip-reading cues, but pitch resolution is poor compared to normal hearing. Amplitude modulation of electrical stimulation is a primary cue for pitch perception in cochlear implant users. The experiments described in this article focus on the relationship between sensitivity to amplitude modulations and pitch resolution based on changes in the frequency of amplitude modulations. In the first experiment, modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution were measured in adults with no known hearing loss and in cochlear implant users with sounds presented to and processed by their clinical devices. Stimuli were amplitude-modulated sinusoids and amplitude-modulated narrow-band noises. Modulation detection and modulation frequency discrimination were measured for modulation frequencies centered on 110, 220, and 440 Hz. Pitch resolution based on changes in modulation frequency was measured for modulation depths of 25 %, 50 %, 100 %, and for a half-waved rectified modulator. Results revealed a strong linear relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution for cochlear implant users and peers with no known hearing loss. In the second experiment, cochlear implant users took part in analogous procedures of modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution but bypassing clinical sound processing using single-electrode stimulation. Results indicated that modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution was better conveyed by single-electrode stimulation than by clinical processors. Results at 440 Hz were worse, but also not well conveyed by clinical sound processing, so it remains unclear whether the 300 Hz perceptual limit described in the literature is a technological or biological limitation. These results highlight modulation depth and sensitivity as critical factors for pitch resolution in cochlear implant users and characterize the relationship that should inform the design of modulation enhancement algorithms for cochlear implants.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Pitch Perception , Humans , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Male , Female , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Cues , Young Adult , Speech Perception , Pitch Discrimination , Auditory Threshold , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing
5.
Hear Res ; 446: 109007, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608331

ABSTRACT

Despite the proven effectiveness of cochlear implant (CI) in the hearing restoration of deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) children, to date, extreme variability in verbal working memory (VWM) abilities is observed in both unilateral and bilateral CI user children (CIs). Although clinical experience has long observed deficits in this fundamental executive function in CIs, the cause to date is still unknown. Here, we have set out to investigate differences in brain functioning regarding the impact of monaural and binaural listening in CIs compared with normal hearing (NH) peers during a three-level difficulty n-back task undertaken in two sensory modalities (auditory and visual). The objective of this pioneering study was to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) marker pattern differences in visual and auditory VWM performances in CIs compared to NH peers and possible differences between unilateral cochlear implant (UCI) and bilateral cochlear implant (BCI) users. The main results revealed differences in theta and gamma EEG bands. Compared with hearing controls and BCIs, UCIs showed hypoactivation of theta in the frontal area during the most complex condition of the auditory task and a correlation of the same activation with VWM performance. Hypoactivation in theta was also observed, again for UCIs, in the left hemisphere when compared to BCIs and in the gamma band in UCIs compared to both BCIs and NHs. For the latter two, a correlation was found between left hemispheric gamma oscillation and performance in the audio task. These findings, discussed in the light of recent research, suggest that unilateral CI is deficient in supporting auditory VWM in DHH. At the same time, bilateral CI would allow the DHH child to approach the VWM benchmark for NH children. The present study suggests the possible effectiveness of EEG in supporting, through a targeted approach, the diagnosis and rehabilitation of VWM in DHH children.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Electroencephalography , Memory, Short-Term , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Visual Perception , Humans , Child , Female , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Male , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Theta Rhythm , Photic Stimulation , Gamma Rhythm , Adolescent , Speech Perception , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/surgery , Hearing
6.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241240572, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676325

ABSTRACT

Realistic outcome measures that reflect everyday hearing challenges are needed to assess hearing aid and cochlear implant (CI) fitting. Literature suggests that listening effort measures may be more sensitive to differences between hearing-device settings than established speech intelligibility measures when speech intelligibility is near maximum. Which method provides the most effective measurement of listening effort for this purpose is currently unclear. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of two tests for measuring changes in listening effort in CI users due to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) differences, as would arise from different hearing-device settings. By comparing the effect size of SNR differences on listening effort measures with test-retest differences, the study evaluated the suitability of these tests for clinical use. Nineteen CI users underwent two listening effort tests at two SNRs (+4 and +8 dB relative to individuals' 50% speech perception threshold). We employed dual-task paradigms-a sentence-final word identification and recall test (SWIRT) and a sentence verification test (SVT)-to assess listening effort at these two SNRs. Our results show a significant difference in listening effort between the SNRs for both test methods, although the effect size was comparable to the test-retest difference, and the sensitivity was not superior to speech intelligibility measures. Thus, the implementations of SVT and SWIRT used in this study are not suitable for clinical use to measure listening effort differences of this magnitude in individual CI users. However, they can be used in research involving CI users to analyze group data.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Feasibility Studies , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Speech Perception/physiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Speech Intelligibility/physiology , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Acoustic Stimulation , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Noise/adverse effects
7.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241246616, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656770

ABSTRACT

Negativity bias is a cognitive bias that results in negative events being perceptually more salient than positive ones. For hearing care, this means that hearing aid benefits can potentially be overshadowed by adverse experiences. Research has shown that sustaining focus on positive experiences has the potential to mitigate negativity bias. The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether a positive focus (PF) intervention can improve speech-in-noise abilities for experienced hearing aid users. Thirty participants were randomly allocated to a control or PF group (N = 2 × 15). Prior to hearing aid fitting, all participants filled out the short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) based on their own hearing aids. At the first visit, they were fitted with study hearing aids, and speech-in-noise testing was performed. Both groups then wore the study hearing aids for two weeks and sent daily text messages reporting hours of hearing aid use to an experimenter. In addition, the PF group was instructed to focus on positive listening experiences and to also report them in the daily text messages. After the 2-week trial, all participants filled out the SSQ12 questionnaire based on the study hearing aids and completed the speech-in-noise testing again. Speech-in-noise performance and SSQ12 Qualities score were improved for the PF group but not for the control group. This finding indicates that the PF intervention can improve subjective and objective hearing aid benefits.


Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment , Hearing Aids , Noise , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Noise/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Perceptual Masking , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/psychology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Audiometry, Speech , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged, 80 and over , Time Factors , Acoustic Stimulation , Hearing , Treatment Outcome
8.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(6): 103060, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33932625

ABSTRACT

Patients with single sided deafness (SSD) struggle with sound localization and speech in noise. Existing treatment options include contralateral routing of signal (CROS) systems, percutaneous bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs), passive transcutaneous BCHDs, active BCHDs, and cochlear implants. Implanted devices provide benefits in speech in noise compared to CROS devices. Percutaneous BCHDs transmit sound efficiently but have aesthetic drawbacks and skin complications. Scalp attenuation impacts passive transcutaneous BCHD performance. Active BCHDs overcome these issues and provide benefits for speech in noise. Cochlear implantation is the only existing option that restores binaural input but introduces electrical rather than acoustic stimuli to the deaf ear. Active BCHDs have been designed to maintain efficient sound transmission and avoid chronic skin irritation and cosmetic concerns that may occur with percutaneous BCHDs. Cochlear implantation may be a superior option for recently deafened SSD patients, though this requires further study. The duration of deafness, patient age and comorbidities, and a shared decision-making model among patients, surgeons, and audiologists should be considered in device selection. The aim of this manuscript is to review available devices, discuss surgical considerations for implantable devices, review available published results for speech in noise and sound quality with each device, and provide an overview to guide shared decision making for patients and providers. This review consolidates available literature and reviews experience with a newer active transcutaneous active BCHD available for use in the SSD population.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Cochlear Implantation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Acoustic Stimulation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Female , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/psychology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Sound Localization , Speech
9.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(3_suppl): 199S-203S, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31565979

ABSTRACT

Bone conduction implants based on percutaneous abutment acoustic transmission have been implemented in patients with satisfactory outcomes. However, adverse soft tissue outcomes present a limitation. Transcutaneous bone conduction devices (t-BCDs) are an alternative that may mitigate these complications. A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent implantation of a t-BCD from 2013 to 2017. Surgical outcomes were reviewed including wound complications, frequency of device use, patient concerns regarding the device, and reported patient satisfaction. A total of 37 patients were implanted with the bone-anchored hearing aids, BAHA Attract (Cochlear™ Baha® Implant System). Average follow-up time was 271.8 days. Postoperatively, 7 (18.9%) patients complained of soft tissue changes or issues with wound healing. Twelve (32.4%) patients requested adjustment of their devices. The t-BCD is an excellent option for hearing rehabilitation. Overall, the complication rate is low, patient satisfaction is high, and successful conversion from a percutaneous device is possible with minimal risk.


Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Conductive/rehabilitation , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Adolescent , Adult , Bone Conduction , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Female , Hearing Loss, Conductive/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
10.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(3_suppl): 215S-219S, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31838921

ABSTRACT

The aim of this article is to describe the audiological patterns of 71 adult patients presenting severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, who were rehabilitated by cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing aids. This is a retrospective study in a university setting, where the clinical records of 71 adult patients were reviewed and processed. Speech intelligibility was evaluated at one aided ear (CI) or at both aided ears (double CI or a combination of CI and hearing aid [HA]). Patients with a bilateral CI or with a bimodal hearing setup (CI and HA) performed better than those with a single CI; data from the phonetic matrices test showed that there was a statistically significant difference among patients aided by a single CI versus binaural setup (double CI or CI + HA). In particular, patients aided by a bilateral CI, or by a CI and HA, showed an improvement in the functional results of the speech tests, compared to patients using a single CI. Binaural hearing (either with a bilateral CI or bimodal) allows an improvement in the functional results at the speech tests, compared to the use of a CI only.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Auditory Threshold , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Speech Intelligibility , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
11.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(3_suppl): 207S-211S, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32986504

ABSTRACT

We propose middle ear implants (MEI) as alternative hearing restoration option for patients with fibrous dysplasia of the temporal bone (FDTB). A 60-year-old man presented with unilateral right-sided conductive hearing loss (CHL) and FDTB. The Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) MEI was implanted in the right ear. Preoperatively, the right side had a pure tone average (PTA) threshold of 67 dB, speech reception threshold (SRT) = 75 dB HL, and speech discrimination score (SDS) = 54% at 80 dB HL presentation level. Postoperative aided PTA threshold of the right ear was 28 db, aided SRT = 30 db, and SDS = 96% at 65dB HL. After excluding cholesteatoma, VSB provides an alternative hearing restoration technique for adults with FDTB and CHL due to stenosis of the external auditory canal and/or ossicular crowding.


Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone/complications , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Conductive/rehabilitation , Ossicular Prosthesis , Auditory Threshold , Ear, Middle/surgery , Hearing Loss, Conductive/etiology , Humans , Male , Medical Illustration , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Implantation , Temporal Bone
12.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S11-S18, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863156

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Multi-centre study of the National French Registry (EPIIC) of patients with cochlear implants, focusing on infants who were operated-on under the age of 24 months between 2012 and 2016. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 615 profoundly deaf infants, who received cochlear implants (CIs) before their second birthday, were included in the registry by different CI centers. Epidemiological, surgical, speech therapy and school, follow-up data were included in the registry, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months thereafter. The following parameters were studied: type of implantation (uni- or bilateral), complications, cause of deafness, category of auditory perception (CAP), Open-set word recognition score (OSW), speech intelligibility rating, lexical comprehension with EVIP (Peabody), communication mode and type of schooling. Bilateral simultaneous CI (BiCI) and unilateral CI (UniCI) groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 744 implantations. The explantation-reimplantation rate, within the four-year follow-up, was just 3.6%. Mean implantation age was 16.0 months, and similar in the two groups (BiCI/UniCI). A total of 51% of children had their first implant between 12 and 18 months, and 15% before 12 months. Implantation was unilateral in 52% of cases. Fifty-six percent of the bilateral procedures were sequential, with a mean delay of 16.8 months for the second implantation. The cause of deafness was unknown in 52% of cases. Of the 48% (297/615) of attributed cases, 32% had clear genetic causes. The remaining deafness was due to cytomegalovirus (CMV, 8%), inner-ear malformation (5%) and meningitis (3%). The main complications were from infections (47%) and internal device failure (25%). Four years post-operation, 84% of the UniCI and 75% of BiCl groups had a CAP≥5, and 83% of UniCl and 100% BiCI had OSW≥80%. Furthermore 74% of UniCI and 77% of BiCI communicated orally and 85% of UniCI and 90% of BiCI integrated into mainstream schooling. CONCLUSION: The French Registry of cochlear implants (EPIIC) is the only such national registry in the world. Our analysis illustrates the immediate benefits of, either single or double, cochlear implantation for language, perception skills and schooling.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Child Language , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/rehabilitation , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Communication , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/etiology , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , Education of Hearing Disabled/methods , Education of Hearing Disabled/statistics & numerical data , Follow-Up Studies , France , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Mainstreaming, Education/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Schools , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors
13.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 14171, 2020 08 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32843659

ABSTRACT

Users of hearing-assistive devices often struggle to locate and segregate sounds, which can make listening in schools, cafes, and busy workplaces extremely challenging. A recent study in unilaterally implanted CI users showed that sound-localisation was improved when the audio received by behind-the-ear devices was converted to haptic stimulation on each wrist. We built on this work, using a new signal-processing approach to improve localisation accuracy and increase generalisability to a wide range of stimuli. We aimed to: (1) improve haptic sound-localisation accuracy using a varied stimulus set and (2) assess whether accuracy improved with prolonged training. Thirty-two adults with normal touch perception were randomly assigned to an experimental or control group. The experimental group completed a 5-h training regime and the control group were not trained. Without training, haptic sound-localisation was substantially better than in previous work on haptic sound-localisation. It was also markedly better than sound-localisation by either unilaterally or bilaterally implanted CI users. After training, accuracy improved, becoming better than for sound-localisation by bilateral hearing-aid users. These findings suggest that a wrist-worn haptic device could be effective for improving spatial hearing for a range of hearing-impaired listeners.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing Aids , Sensory Aids , Sound Localization/physiology , Touch/physiology , Wearable Electronic Devices , Adult , Equipment Design , Female , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Speech Perception , Wrist , Young Adult
14.
J Int Adv Otol ; 16(2): 158-164, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32784152

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of an adhesive adapter prosthesis (AAP) on memory function in pediatric subjects with single side hearing loss (SSHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case-control study. 19 pediatric subjects with mild to moderate SSHL treated with AAP and 15 subjects with normal hearing (control group) were included in this study. Working and short-term memory functions were tested in all subjects, in silence and noise conditions. In SSHL subjects, tests were performed before the AAP was applied (T0) and at 1-month (T1) follow-up. The control group was tested once. RESULTS: AAP significantly improved working memory function in noise as measured at T1 (p<0.01) compared with T0, but T1 scores in children with SSHL remained significantly different from the ones of the control group (p<0.01). AAP also significantly improved short- term memory function test scores at T1 compared with T0 (p<0.01), but despite being in the normal range for the subjects' age, the scores remained significantly different from those of the control group (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: In pediatric subjects with mild, moderate, and moderate-severe SSHL, restoration of bilateral hearing through AAP improved short-term memory function and working memory function in noise, as measured at 1 month follow-up; however, AAP did not seem to lead to a full restoration of such functions as measured by a comparison with healthy controls. Further studies with longer follow-ups might help elucidate whether AAP can elicit further improvements in memory functions.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Correction of Hearing Impairment/psychology , Female , Hearing , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Noise , Treatment Outcome
15.
Int J Audiol ; 59(7): 524-533, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441563

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of NLFC fitting in hearing aids and auditory acclimatisation on speech perception and sound-quality rating in hearing-impaired, native Mandarin-speaking adult listeners.Design: Mandarin consonant, vowel and tone recognition were tested in quiet and sentence recognition in noise (speech-shaped noise at a +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio) with NLFC-on and NLFC-off. Sound-quality ratings were collected on a 0-10 scale at each test session. A generalised linear model and correlational analyses were performed.Study sample: Thirty native Mandarin-speaking adults with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss were recruited.Results: The hearing-impaired listeners showed significantly higher accuracy with NLFC-on than with NLFC-off for consonant and sentence recognition and the recognition performance improved with both NLFC-on and off as a function of increased length of use. The satisfaction score of sound-quality ratings for different types of sounds significantly increased with NLFC-on than with NLFC-off. The speech recognition results showed moderate to strong correlation with the unaided hearing thresholds.Conclusion: For native Mandarin-speaking listeners with hearing loss, the NLFC technology provided modest but significant improvement in Mandarin fricative and sentence recognition. Subjectively, the naturalness and overall preference of sound-quality satisfaction judgement also improved with NLFC.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing Aids/psychology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Speech Perception , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , China , Correction of Hearing Impairment/psychology , Correlation of Data , Female , Humans , Language , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Noise , Speech Reception Threshold Test
16.
Int J Audiol ; 59(8): 615-623, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32105163

ABSTRACT

Objective: To explore the prevalence of device-related problems associated with hearing aid use, participants' help-seeking behaviours for these problems, and factors associated with hearing aid problems.Design: A prospective convenience cohort design surveying 413 adult hearing aid users (34-97 years of age) recruited from seven clinics across Australia.Results: Almost all participants (98%) indicated that they were experiencing at least one of the hearing aid problems included on the survey. The number of hearing aid related problems reported by participants ranged from 0 to 25 (of a possible 26), with a mean of 10 problems (SD = 5). The three most reported problems were related to difficulty hearing in noisy environments, hearing in windy environments, and understanding certain voices. Participants had reported less than half (46.33%) of the total problems identified to their clinic (range = 0-100%, mean = 43.40, SD = 13.92). Participants who reported experiencing a greater number of hearing aid problems also reported lower levels of hearing aid benefit, and satisfaction with their hearing aids.Conclusions: The majority of hearing aid owners experience problems with their hearing aids. Addressing these problems would likely contribute to improved hearing aid outcomes.


Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Aids/adverse effects , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia/epidemiology , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
17.
Hear Res ; 388: 107885, 2020 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035288

ABSTRACT

A bio-inspired coding (BIC) strategy was implemented in this study with the goal of better representation of spectral and temporal information. The auditory nerve fibers' (ANFs) characteristics such as refractory recovery, facilitation and spatial spread were obtained from ECAP data recorded in 11 CI recipients. These characteristics, together with a non-individualized model-derived adaptation effect, were integrated into the BIC strategy for a better selection of channels. Two variations of the BIC strategy were compared to the conventional advanced combination encoder (ACE) coding strategy: the BIC-I strategy based on the individual CI recipients' ECAP parameters, and the BIC-G strategy based on the median values of ECAP parameters from all CI recipients who participated in the study. The melodic contour identification (MCI) and Oldenburg sentence recognition in noise (OLSA) tests were used to assess and compare the three coding strategies. A significantly better performance in the transformed MCI test results with the rationalized arcsine transformation, was observed for both BIC strategy variations compared to the ACE strategy. There was no significant difference between the two variations of the BIC strategy and the ACE strategy in the OLSA test. No correlation was found between recovery time constants, absolute refractory periods, left and right width of SOE functions from three test electrodes and CI recipients' performances in the two experiments. However, significant correlations were found between facilitation time constant and amplitude and the results of the MCI and OLSA tests for the two variations of the BIC strategy.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Noise/adverse effects , Perceptual Masking , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Pitch Perception , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Electric Stimulation , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Recognition, Psychology , Speech Intelligibility , Young Adult
18.
Int J Audiol ; 59(3): 166-172, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32011190

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This article aims to estimate the global and regional needs, unmet needs and access to hearing aids, as well as the morbidity that can be averted by their use.Design: The study was based on Global Burden of Disease data. Study sample: Hearing impaired individuals "in need" of a hearing aid were defined as those in the moderate, moderately severe, and severe categories.Results: Globally, 401.4 million people are 'in need' of hearing aids. The large majority (83%) of them do not use hearing aids, with higher levels being in some regions such as the African region (90%). Accounting for hearing aid coverage reduced morbidity by 14.6% (95% UI 13.1- 16) - from 25 million YLDs to 21.3 million YLDs. It was estimated that if every single prevalent case in need would use a hearing aid, the burden of disease in this population would be reduced from the untreated 25 million YLDs to 10.3 million YLDs - a reduction of 59%.Conclusions: Development of innovative low-cost technologies with effective service delivery models, policy and regulatory changes to improve access, and combatting the stigma and lack of awareness are some of the potential solutions to improve access to hearing aids.


Subject(s)
Global Burden of Disease/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Aids/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Humans , Incidence , Prevalence , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
19.
Int J Audiol ; 59(7): 556-565, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32069128

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the performance of an active transcutaneous implantable-bone conduction device (TI-BCD), and to evaluate the benefit of device digital signal processing (DSP) features in challenging listening environments.Design: Participants were tested at 1- and 3-month post-activation of the TI-BCD. At each session, aided and unaided phoneme perception was assessed using the Ling-6 test. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and quality ratings of speech and music samples were collected in noisy and reverberant environments, with and without the DSP features. Self-assessment of the device performance was obtained using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire.Study sample: Six adults with conductive or mixed hearing loss.Results: Average SRTs were 2.9 and 12.3 dB in low and high reverberation environments, respectively, which improved to -1.7 and 8.7 dB, respectively with the DSP features. In addition, speech quality ratings improved by 23 points with the DSP features when averaged across all environmental conditions. Improvement scores on APHAB scales revealed a statistically significant aided benefit.Conclusions: Noise and reverberation significantly impacted speech recognition performance and perceived sound quality. DSP features (directional microphone processing and adaptive noise reduction) significantly enhanced subjects' performance in these challenging listening environments.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Conductive/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural/physiopathology , Adult , Female , Hearing Loss, Conductive/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noise , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prosthesis Design , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Speech Perception , Speech Reception Threshold Test
20.
Int J Audiol ; 59(5): 392-397, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31944127

ABSTRACT

Objective: The satisfaction experienced with using an audio processor is very important to hearing implant system users. Currently there are no measures that can be used to assess user satisfaction with an audio processor. This study aims to develop and validate a specific and standardised questionnaire that focuses on user satisfaction with their audio processor.Design: A preliminary version of the questionnaire was initially developed by experts in the field. Following validation of these results, the final version of the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ) was developed consisting of 15 items. Item analyses and questionnaire validation measurements were assessed.Study sample: Sixty-nine subjects were recruited and asked to complete the APSQ twice within 2-4 weeks.Results: Subjects reported a high user satisfaction with the questionnaire and with their audio processor. The questionnaire had good reliability and results for test-retest reliability were high and significant across all items and across subscale analyses.Conclusion: Item analyses and reliability analyses show that the questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool to assess user satisfaction across different audio processors and hearing implant systems. The APSQ is a quick and easy tool to measure user satisfaction with their audio processor.


Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment/psychology , Hearing Aids/psychology , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Female , Hearing Loss/psychology , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Principal Component Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Speech Perception , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...