Routine creatine kinase testing does not provide clinical utility in the emergency department for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Despite the high sensitivity and negative predictive value of contemporary high-sensitivity troponin T assays (hsTnT), creatine kinase (CK) continues to be routinely tested for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We conducted a study to identify the clinical utility of routine CK measurement, its relevance in clinical decision making in the era of hsTnT, and the potential cost-savings achievable by limiting its use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all adult patients presenting to a tertiary care center in the year 2017. We identified patients presenting with cardiac complaints who had non-diagnostic hsTnT and positive CK. These patients underwent chart review to determine whether a diagnosis of AMI was made. RESULTS: A total of 36,251 presentations were reviewed. 9951 had cardiac complaints and 8150 had CK measured. 82% of these patients had hsTnT and CK measured; 2012 of these patients had non-diagnostic hsTnT with positive CK. Of these 2012 patients, only 1 was subsequently diagnosed with AMI (0.012%). CK provided no diagnostic benefit over hsTnT alone in > 99.9% of cases. With a cost for CK of $4/test, we estimated that routine CK testing costs at least $32,000 per year in our center, and over $100,000 per year across the region. CONCLUSION: Routine CK testing does not provide a significant benefit to patient care and therefore represents an unnecessary system cost. Routine CK testing for the diagnosis of AMI should be eliminated from emergency departments in the era of hsTnT assays.

Long-term experience with an accelerated protocol for diagnosis of chest pain.

CONTEXT: More than 6 million patients present annually with chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential for best clinical outcomes, for optimal management of hospital resources, and for minimizing medicolegal exposure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and cost outcomes of an accelerated protocol for chest pain triage in a community-based hospital of moderate size. METHODS: One hundred successive patients with chest pain were diagnosed according to the Traditional Chest Pain Protocol, which included testing of serial blood samples for creatine kinase (CK)-MB and total CK. These patients were also subjected to the Accelerated Chest Pain Protocol under evaluation, which included testing at shortened intervals for myoglobin and cardiac troponin I in addition to CK and CK-MB. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were compared versus the final assigned diagnosis. The Accelerated Chest Pain Protocol was implemented for routine use. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1 month (test group A, N = 180) and 22 months (test group B, N = 180). Costs for diagnosis and treatment of the 2 test groups were compared with those for the control group. RESULTS: The 2 protocols had equivalent specificity values (99%). The sensitivity of the Accelerated Chest Pain Protocol was higher than that of the Traditional Chest Pain Protocol (95% vs 58%). Cost savings of 29% and a reduction in length of stay of 33% were achieved in test group B versus the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The Accelerated Chest Pain Protocol improved the accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome while reducing costs.