Association of nurse staffing grade and 30-day mortality in intensive care units among cardiovascular disease patients.

After the implementation of a policy differentiating inpatient nursing fees, no study is found in the nursing literature for intensive care unit (ICU) patients admitted with cardiovascular (CV) disease exclusively in Korea. This study investigates the relationship between ICU nurse staffing and 30-day mortality using large representative claim database.National Health Insurance Service-Senior (NHIS-Senior) claim database from 2002 to 2013, which was released by the Korean National Health Insurance Service (KNHIS), was used in this study. We included CV disease inpatients as a primary diagnostic code (I20-I25) who had their ICU utilization records from differentiating inpatient nursing fees code, resulting in 17,081 subjectsAfter adjusting for confounders, the hazard ratio (HR) for 30-day mortality after discharge (HR: 1.177; P: .018) and in-hospital 30-day mortality (HR: 1.145; P: .058) were higher in general hospital (GH) than in tertiary hospital (TH). In GH setting, HR for 30-day mortality after discharge (HR: 1.499; P: .010) and in-hospital 30-day mortality (HR: 1.377; P: .042) were higher in grade 7 to 9 than grade 1 to 2, but not in TH setting.This study shows that ICU nurse staffing related to improved mortality risk in GHs. Therefore, adequate nurse staffing to provide safe and high-quality care can be ensured by continuous monitoring and evaluation of nurse staffing.

Análisis del registro de un sistema de notificación de incidentes en una unidad de cuidados críticos / Analysis of an incident notification system and register in a critical care unit

Objetivo. Analizar los incidentes comunicados a través de un sistema de notificación y registro en una unidad de cuidados críticos. Metodología. Estudio transversal descriptivo. Se realizó un análisis de los registros de incidentes comunicados de manera anónima y voluntaria de enero de 2007 a diciembre de 2013 en una unidad de cuidados críticos de pacientes adultos con trauma grave. Variables de estudio: tipo y clase de incidente, profesional que notifica y sugerencias de medidas de mejora. Análisis descriptivo de variables. Resultados. Se comunicaron un total de 275 incidentes, de los cuales el 58,5% fueron eventos adversos. Los incidentes distribuidos por clases: medicación 33,7%; accesos vasculares-drenajes-sondas-sensores 19,6%; aparatos-equipos 13,3%; procedimientos 11,5%, vía aérea y ventilación mecánica 10%; cuidados enfermeros 4,1%; comunicación interprofesional 3%; pruebas diagnósticas 3%; identificación paciente 1,1% y transfusión 0,7%. En el grupo de medicación los errores de administración constituyeron el 62%; en el de accesos vasculares-drenajes-sondas-sensores las vías venosas centrales el 27%; en aparatos y equipos los respiradores un 46,9%; en vía aérea las autoextubaciones el 32,1%. En relación con los errores de medicación el 62% fueron incidentes sin daño. La notificación de incidentes por profesional: médicos 43%; residentes 5,6%; enfermeros 51%; técnicos auxiliares 0,4%. Conclusiones. Los incidentes que más se comunican son eventos adversos. Los sucesos relacionados con la administración de medicación son los más frecuentes, aunque la mayoría no ocasionaron daño. Los enfermeros y médicos comunican incidentes con similar frecuencia. Destaca la baja notificación de incidentes a pesar de ser un sistema anónimo y voluntario, por ello, se sugiere estudiar medidas para aumentar el grado de comunicación

Objective. To analyse the incident communicated through a notification system and register in a critical care unit. Methodology. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted by performing an analysis of the records of incidents communicated anonymously and voluntarily from January 2007 to December 2013 in a critical care unit of adult patients with severe trauma. Study variables: incident type and class, professional reports, and suggestions for improvement measures. A descriptive analysis was performed on the variables. Results. Out of a total of 275 incidents reported, 58.5% of them were adverse events. Incident distributed by classes: medication, 33.7%; vascular access-drainage-catheter-sensor, 19.6%; devices-equipment, 13.3%, procedures, 11.5%; airway tract and mechanical ventilation, 10%; nursing care, 4.1%; inter-professional communication, 3%; diagnostic test, 3%; patient identification, 1.1%, and transfusion 0.7%. In the medication group, administrative errors accounted for a total of 62%; in vascular access-drainage-catheter-sensor group, central venous lines, a total of 27%; in devices and equipment group, respirators, a total of 46.9%; in airway self-extubations, a total of 32.1%. As regards to medication errors, 62% were incidents without damage. Incident notification by profession: doctors, 43%, residents, 5.6%, nurses, 51%, and technical assistants, 0.4%. Conclusions. Adverse events are the most communicated incidents. The events related to medication administration are the most frequent, although most of them were without damage. Nurses and doctors communicate the incidents with the same frequency. In order to highlight the low incident notification despite it being an anonymous and volunteer system, therefore, it is suggested to study measurements to increase the level of communication

Critical Care Nurses' Knowledge of Confidentiality Legislation.

BACKGROUND: Health care legislation can be difficult to understand and apply in critical situations where patients may not be physically capable of autonomous control of confidential health information. Nurses are often the first to encounter confidential information about patients. OBJECTIVES: To explore critical care nurses' knowledge of federal and North Carolina state legislation regarding confidentiality. METHODS: This descriptive, qualitative study included 12 critical care nurses who were asked to describe their knowledge of federal confidentiality legislation and specific knowledge of North Carolina's confidentiality legislation. RESULTS: Critical care nurses were knowledgeable about federal confidentiality laws but demonstrated a need for further education about state-specific legislation. CONCLUSION: Nurses' application of confidentiality legislation demonstrates their knowledge of confidentiality legislation. To continue the trusting relationship that nurses have traditionally held with patients and patients' families, it is imperative for nurses to remain current about confidentiality legislation. Through education both before and after licensure, correct application of legislation can be achieved. Further research can aid in exploring the intersection between health care legislation and ethics.

Ébola / No disponible

No disponible