Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 47
Filter
2.
Curr Obes Rep ; 9(4): 530-543, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33180307

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Pathways for obesity prevention and treatment are well documented, yet the prevalence of obesity is rising, and access to treatment (including bariatric surgery) is limited. This review seeks to assess the current integrated clinical pathway for obesity management in England and determine the major challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence for tier 2 (community-based lifestyle intervention) and tier 3 (specialist weight management services) is limited, and how it facilitates care and improve outcomes in tier 4 remains uncertain. Treatment access, rigidity in pathways, uncertain treatment outcomes and weight stigma seems to be major barriers to improved care. More emphasis must be placed on access to effective treatments, treatment flexibility, addressing stigma and ensuring treatment efficacy including long-term health outcomes. Prevention and treatment should both receive significant focus though should be considered to be largely separate pathways. A simplified system for weight management is needed to allow flexibility and the delivery of personalized care including post-bariatric surgery care for those who need it.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy , Obesity Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Obesity, Morbid/therapy , Weight Reduction Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , England , Female , Humans , Male , State Medicine , Treatment Outcome
3.
Emerg Med Australas ; 32(4): 703-705, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386246

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has massively changed the health landscape around the world. Wide-ranging changes to healthcare delivery have occurred, especially in hospitals and EDs. Health services have made local decisions about care pathways, in some cases deviating from what would, until recently, have been considered widely accepted care. These changes bring with them new medicolegal risk for clinicians. In Australia, civil liability Acts provide protection for professionals when the criterion of having undertaken 'competent' practice that would be 'widely accepted' 'in the circumstances' is met. There is doubt how courts, and the medical experts who advise them, will evaluate clinical care provided during the pandemic when health services have developed local care pathways and there is no nationally accepted standard.


Subject(s)
Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Pandemics/legislation & jurisprudence , Australia , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Standard of Care/legislation & jurisprudence
4.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(3): 549-554, 2020 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32421500

ABSTRACT

Human trafficking is a human rights violation affecting millions worldwide. Victims may go unrecognized during their emergency department (ED) visit, and may lose the opportunity to address their complex needs. Using a published toolkit based on existing guidelines and recommendations from experts, and models from other centers, we describe the implementation of an ED response protocol. In following the recommendations of the toolkit, we began with attempts to fully understand the local human trafficking problem and then networked with those working in anti-trafficking efforts. Collaboration with other specialties is highlighted as a key part of this process. Building upon the knowledge gained from these steps, we were able to develop a concise protocol to guide members of our department in more effectively caring for known or suspected victims of human trafficking. The first section of the protocol addresses ways in which providers can identify at-risk patients through both screening questions and general observations. Interviewing techniques are outlined with an emphasis on patient-centered and trauma-informed care. Additionally, the protocol discusses physician responsibility in documenting encounters and legal reporting, which may vary depending on location. We stress the importance of meeting the needs of the patient while prioritizing the safety of all involved. Additionally, the protocol provides a list of resources for the patient beyond medical care such as emergency housing, legal assistance, and food pantries. The overall purpose of this protocol is to provide coordinated response so that all providers may be consistent in caring for this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Personnel , Human Trafficking/prevention & control , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Critical Pathways/standards , Human Trafficking/ethics , Human Trafficking/psychology , Humans , Intersectoral Collaboration , Professional Role , Quality Improvement , Vulnerable Populations
5.
Hastings Cent Rep ; 48 Suppl 4: S14-S18, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30584846

ABSTRACT

Five decades ago, Henry Knowles Beecher, a renowned professor of research anesthesiology, sought to solve a problem created by modern medicine. The solution proposed by Beecher and his colleagues on the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death proved very influential.1 Indeed, other contemporaneous medical developments magnified its significance yet also made the solution it offered somewhat problematic. As we mark this fiftieth anniversary, at a time when concerns about the conceptual model on which its recommendations rested are being voiced by critics from medicine as well as philosophy, it is worthwhile to view the committee's report in relation to the problem that prompted its existence as well as the one to which it was quickly applied.


Subject(s)
Brain Death/diagnosis , Coma/psychology , Critical Pathways , Death , Tissue and Organ Harvesting , Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Death , Bioethical Issues , Critical Pathways/ethics , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Neurology/trends , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/ethics , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/psychology
7.
Soins Psychiatr ; 38(310): 32-39, 2017.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28476255

ABSTRACT

With the reforms of 2011 and 2013 relating to psychiatric hospitalisation, raises the question of the suitability of modern psychiatric practice with regard to a person's recognised principles and basic rights. Achieving a balance is difficult and the Constitutional Council has joined the debate, bringing to an end any idea of compromise between safety and freedom. A decision which was made as a result of a clarification of certain regulations which have proved controversial from the point of view of individual liberties.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Mental Disorders/nursing , Nurse-Patient Relations , Patient Advocacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Isolation/legislation & jurisprudence , Personal Autonomy , Psychiatric Nursing/legislation & jurisprudence , Restraint, Physical/legislation & jurisprudence , Dangerous Behavior , France , Humans , Mental Disorders/psychology , Milieu Therapy/legislation & jurisprudence , Milieu Therapy/organization & administration , Nursing, Team/legislation & jurisprudence , Nursing, Team/organization & administration , Patient Isolation/psychology , Patient Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Restraint, Physical/psychology
8.
Gut ; 65(10): 1585-601, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27325419

ABSTRACT

Much has changed since the last guideline of 2008, both in endoscopy and in the practice of obtaining informed consent, and it is vital that all endoscopists who are responsible for performing invasive and increasingly risky procedures are aware of the requirements for obtaining valid consent. This guideline is restricted to GI endoscopy but we cover elective and acute or emergency procedures. Few clinical trials have been carried out in relation to informed consent but most areas are informed by guidance from the General Medical Counsel (GMC) and/or are enshrined in legislation. Following an iterative voting process a series of recommendations have been drawn up that cover the majority of situations that will be encountered by endoscopists. This is not exhaustive and where doubt exists we have described where legal advice is likely to be required. This document relates to the law and endoscopy practice in the UK-where there is variation between the four devolved countries this is pointed out and endoscopists must be aware of the law where they practice. The recommendations are divided into consent for patients with and without capacity and we provide sections on provision of information and the consent process for patients in a variety of situations. This guideline is intended for use by all practitioners who request or perform GI endoscopy, or are involved in the pathway of such patients. If followed, we hope this document will enhance the experience of patients attending for endoscopy in UK units.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Informed Consent , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Critical Pathways/standards , Disclosure , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/legislation & jurisprudence , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/standards , Humans , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/standards , Mental Competency , Safety Management/organization & administration , United Kingdom
9.
Rofo ; 187(11): 990-7, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26230139

ABSTRACT

Caused by legal reform initiatives there is a continuous need to increase effectiveness and efficiency in hospitals and surgeries, and thus to improve processes.Consequently the successful management of radiological departments and surgeries requires suitable structures and optimization processes to make optimization in the fields of medical quality, service quality and efficiency possible.In future in the DRG System it is necessary that the organisation of processes must focus on the whole clinical treatment of the patients (Clinical Pathways). Therefore the functions of controlling must be more established and adjusted. On the basis of select Controlling instruments like budgeting, performance indicators, process optimization, staff controlling and benchmarking the target-based and efficient control of radiological surgeries and departments is shown.


Subject(s)
Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost-Benefit Analysis/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/economics , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Diagnosis-Related Groups/legislation & jurisprudence , Diagnosis-Related Groups/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational/economics , Efficiency, Organizational/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Humans , National Health Programs/economics , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/economics , Quality Improvement/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Radiology Department, Hospital/economics , Radiology Department, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence
10.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25971454

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 were conformed to German law on July 20, 2007 and described in detail by the Implementing Act (IHR DG). According to these legal bases, "designated airports" must maintain special capacities for protection against health threats, and are also responsible for performing regular IHR exercises. OBJECTIVES: Representation of the optimization of established operational concepts of various professions to manage infectious biological threats without obstruction of international travel, and mediation of experience to IHR professionals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exercise based on the case scenario of a travel-related febrile illness was performed at Munich International Airport on November 11, 2013. Preparations took 6 months and the exercise itself lasted nearly 12 h. The follow-up lasted an additional 9 months. A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the exercise was completed. RESULTS: From an Individual Medicine and Public Health perspective, modular work structures and risk communication functioned adequately. The medical examination of passengers was also well managed. Areas requiring further optimization included arrival/departure times of external actors, transport of the index patient to hospital and protective measures for individual participants. Overall, a defined biological threat scenario representing a double infection with two highly pathogenic germs was handled satisfactorily without affecting international air travel. CONCLUSIONS: Modular supply components are an effective and forward-looking means in protection against threats occurring at airports. Key success factors include sufficient staff mobility, immediate self-protection of actors involved, effective risk communication and a strong overall coordination and monitoring of the situation.


Subject(s)
Aerospace Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Aviation/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Isolation/legislation & jurisprudence , International Law , Patient Isolation/legislation & jurisprudence , Transportation of Patients/legislation & jurisprudence , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Global Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Internationality , Models, Organizational , Patient Isolators/standards , Patient Simulation
11.
Lik Sprava ; (7-8): 163-7, 2015.
Article in Ukrainian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27491170

ABSTRACT

An overview of scientific data on current approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases has been exposed. The results of proceedings on development of the local clinical pathway "Prevention of cardiovascular disease" in the State Institution of Science "Research and Practical Center of Preventive and Clinical Medicine" State Administrative Department has been generalized.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Humans , Risk Factors , Ukraine/epidemiology
12.
J Med Ethics ; 41(8): 639-43, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24850872

ABSTRACT

The Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying has recently been the topic of substantial media interest and also been subject to the independent Neuberger Review. This review has identified clear failings in some areas of care and recommended the Liverpool Care Pathway be phased out. I argue that while the evidence gathered of poor incidences of practice by the Review is of genuine concern for end of life care, the inferences drawn from this evidence are inconsistent with the causes for the concern. Seeking to end an approach that is widely seen as best practice and which can genuinely deliver high quality care because of negative impressions that have been formed from failing to implement it properly is not a good basis for radically overhauling our approach to end of life care. I conclude that improvements in training, communication and ethical decision-making, without the added demand to end the Liverpool Care Pathway, would have resulted in a genuine advance in end of life care.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/ethics , Quality Improvement , Terminal Care/ethics , Communication , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Decision Making , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Policy Making , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Terminal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Terminology as Topic , United Kingdom/epidemiology
15.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 10 Suppl 1: S1-9, 2012 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23042831

ABSTRACT

The quality of patient care varies based on numerous factors, such as health care setting, geographic location, access to medications, insurance coverage, and treatment protocols. Recently, the issue of whether use of clinical pathways can reduce costs and inappropriate variability in care has been the subject of much debate. As clinical treatment guidelines and pathways are increasingly deployed in oncology practice, they have a growing impact on the quality of treatment and how it is delivered. To fulfill the current need to discuss the use of pathways and clinical treatment guidelines in oncology and to address how patient care is impacted by their use, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network convened the NCCN Oncology Policy Summit: Equity in Cancer Care-Pathways, Protocols, and Guidelines. The summit was a forum to discuss the use and implementation of pathways, including how much flexibility pathways should allow in care, pathways' impact on public and private health insurance benefit design, what data is used to select pathway regimens and protocols, and ultimately what impact pathways may have on variation in care. The use and implementation of clinical treatment guidelines in practice was also explored from a variety of perspectives.


Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols , Critical Pathways , Health Services Accessibility , Neoplasms/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Clinical Protocols/standards , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Drug Industry/economics , Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Medical Oncology/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Oncology/methods , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/trends , Neoplasms/economics , Quality of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Standard of Care/economics , Standard of Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Standard of Care/organization & administration , Standard of Care/trends , United States
16.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 87(5): 530-3, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20407457

ABSTRACT

Many successful large industries, such as computer-chip manufacturers, the cable television industry, and high-definition television developers,(1) have established successful precompetitive collaborations focusing on standards, applied science, and technology that advance the field for all stakeholders and benefit the public.(2) The pharmaceutical industry, however, has a well-earned reputation for fierce competition and did not demonstrate willingness to share data or knowledge until the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched the Critical Path Initiative in 2004 (ref. 3).


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Critical Pathways/economics , Critical Pathways/trends , Drug Discovery/methods , Drug Industry/methods , Drug Industry/trends , Economic Competition/trends , United States Food and Drug Administration/trends , Animals , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Discovery/economics , Drug Discovery/trends , Drug Industry/economics , Economic Competition/economics , Economic Competition/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/economics , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence
18.
Arch Pediatr ; 17(4): 420-5, 2010 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20206481

ABSTRACT

Palliative care in newborns may take place in the delivery room and then continued either in maternity wards or in the neonatal unit. For babies developing a chronic condition, going home may be advantageous. The population concerned includes babies born with a severe intractable congenital malformation and certain extremely preterm newborn babies at the limits of viability. Care procedures as well as withholding and withdrawing treatments are reviewed.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/therapy , Critical Pathways/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Infant, Premature, Diseases/therapy , Palliative Care/ethics , Patient Care Team/ethics , Adult , Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Cooperative Behavior , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , France , Humans , Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature, Diseases/diagnosis , Interdisciplinary Communication , Life Support Care/ethics , Life Support Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Futility/ethics , Medical Futility/legislation & jurisprudence , Palliative Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Care Team/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional-Family Relations/ethics , Withholding Treatment/ethics , Withholding Treatment/legislation & jurisprudence
19.
World Hosp Health Serv ; 45(3): 10-2, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20136028

ABSTRACT

Clinical paths in Bulgaria are used not as a method for quality assessment, but as an instrument to fund hospitals. Their use and incompleteness cause limited access of all Bulgarian citizens to the international treatment guidelines. That way quality of treatment worsens and mortality increases. The Bulgarian system of regulated medical guidelines by all therapeutic and surgical lines still suffers many deficiencies. The National Health Insurance Fund should use the system of clinical paths for quality control as well.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/economics , Financial Management, Hospital , Financing, Government , Inpatients , Bulgaria/epidemiology , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Guideline Adherence , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Quality of Health Care
20.
Nurs Stand ; 24(14): 35-9, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20069765

ABSTRACT

Myths have developed surrounding the law and ethical principles in end of life care, which can make care provision at the end of life complex and fraught with potential dilemmas. This article examines three of the most common myths related to the provision of palliative care and highlights their inadequacy when set against the ethical and legal principles on which end of life care pathways are based.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Palliative Care , Attitude of Health Personnel , Benchmarking , Critical Pathways/ethics , Critical Pathways/legislation & jurisprudence , Euthanasia/ethics , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Homicide/ethics , Homicide/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Mental Competency/legislation & jurisprudence , Palliative Care/ethics , Palliative Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Advocacy/ethics , Patient Advocacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Principle-Based Ethics , United Kingdom , Withholding Treatment/ethics , Withholding Treatment/legislation & jurisprudence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...