Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 7.893
Filter
1.
J Med Life ; 17(1): 41-49, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38737657

ABSTRACT

Multi-drug resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales remain a major clinical problem. Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant strains are particularly difficult to treat. This study aimed to assess the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of MDR Enterobacterales isolates. A total of 154 non-repetitive clinical isolates, including Escherichia coli (n = 66), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 70), and other Enterobacterales (n = 18), were collected from the Diagnostic Microbiology Laboratory at King Fahad Hospital of the University. Most E. coli isolates were collected from urine specimens (n = 50, 75.8%) and resistance against the third and fourth-generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefixime, and cefepime) and fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) was assessed. Clonal relatedness analysis using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) revealed two clones (E. coli A and B), each comprising two strains. Most K. pneumoniae samples were collected from respiratory specimens (27.1%, 20 samples), and the strains showed overall resistance to most of the antimicrobials tested (54%‒100%). Moreover, clonal-relatedness analysis using ERIC-PCR revealed seven major clones of K. pneumoniae. These findings suggest nosocomial transmission among some identical strains and emphasize the importance of strict compliance with infection prevention and control policies and regulations. Environmental reservoirs could facilitate this indirect transmission, which needs to be investigated.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Humans , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Male , Female , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Enterobacteriaceae/genetics , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Adult , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli/genetics , Middle Aged , Hospitals, University
2.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303132, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768224

ABSTRACT

There are few studies comparing proportion, frequency, mortality and mortality rate following antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) infections between tertiary-care hospitals (TCHs) and secondary-care hospitals (SCHs) in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to inform intervention strategies. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the utility of an offline tool to generate AMR reports and data for a secondary data analysis. We conducted a secondary-data analysis on a retrospective, multicentre data of hospitalised patients in Thailand. Routinely collected microbiology and hospital admission data of 2012 to 2015, from 15 TCHs and 34 SCHs were analysed using the AMASS v2.0 (www.amass.website). We then compared the burden of AMR bloodstream infections (BSI) between those TCHs and SCHs. Of 19,665 patients with AMR BSI caused by pathogens under evaluation, 10,858 (55.2%) and 8,807 (44.8%) were classified as community-origin and hospital-origin BSI, respectively. The burden of AMR BSI was considerably different between TCHs and SCHs, particularly of hospital-origin AMR BSI. The frequencies of hospital-origin AMR BSI per 100,000 patient-days at risk in TCHs were about twice that in SCHs for most pathogens under evaluation (for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAB]: 18.6 vs. 7.0, incidence rate ratio 2.77; 95%CI 1.72-4.43, p<0.001; for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa [CRPA]: 3.8 vs. 2.0, p = 0.0073; third-generation cephalosporin resistant Escherichia coli [3GCREC]: 12.1 vs. 7.0, p<0.001; third-generation cephalosporin resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae [3GCRKP]: 12.2 vs. 5.4, p<0.001; carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae [CRKP]: 1.6 vs. 0.7, p = 0.045; and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]: 5.1 vs. 2.5, p = 0.0091). All-cause in-hospital mortality (%) following hospital-origin AMR BSI was not significantly different between TCHs and SCHs (all p>0.20). Due to the higher frequencies, all-cause in-hospital mortality rates following hospital-origin AMR BSI per 100,000 patient-days at risk were considerably higher in TCHs for most pathogens (for CRAB: 10.2 vs. 3.6,mortality rate ratio 2.77; 95%CI 1.71 to 4.48, p<0.001; CRPA: 1.6 vs. 0.8; p = 0.020; 3GCREC: 4.0 vs. 2.4, p = 0.009; 3GCRKP, 4.0 vs. 1.8, p<0.001; CRKP: 0.8 vs. 0.3, p = 0.042; and MRSA: 2.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.023). In conclusion, the burden of AMR infections in some LMICs might differ by hospital type and size. In those countries, activities and resources for antimicrobial stewardship and infection control programs might need to be tailored based on hospital setting. The frequency and in-hospital mortality rate of hospital-origin AMR BSI are important indicators and should be routinely measured to monitor the burden of AMR in every hospital with microbiology laboratories in LMICs.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Thailand/epidemiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Female , Male , Cross Infection/mortality , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Hospital Mortality
3.
Gut Microbes ; 16(1): 2351478, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780485

ABSTRACT

For many years, it has been hypothesized that pathological changes to the gut microbiome in critical illness is a driver of infections, organ dysfunction, and other adverse outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). The advent of contemporary microbiome methodologies and multi-omics tools have allowed researchers to test this hypothesis by dissecting host-microbe interactions in the gut to better define its contribution to critical illness pathogenesis. Observational studies of patients in ICUs have revealed that gut microbial communities are profoundly altered in critical illness, characterized by markedly reduced alpha diversity, loss of commensal taxa, and expansion of potential pathogens. These key features of ICU gut dysbiosis have been associated with adverse outcomes including life-threatening hospital-acquired (nosocomial) infections. Current research strives to define cellular and molecular mechanisms connecting gut dysbiosis with infections and other outcomes, and to identify opportunities for therapeutic modulation of host-microbe interactions. This review synthesizes evidence from studies of critically ill patients that have informed our understanding of intestinal dysbiosis in the ICU, mechanisms linking dysbiosis to infections and other adverse outcomes, as well as clinical trials of microbiota-modifying therapies. Additionally, we discuss novel avenues for precision microbial therapeutics to combat nosocomial infections and other life-threatening complications of critical illness.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Cross Infection , Dysbiosis , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Humans , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Intensive Care Units , Animals , Host Microbial Interactions , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification
4.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 72(1): 43-46, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736073

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A survey-based approach to managing antibiotic-resistant infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, with a focus on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) cases, was conducted. Among CRE, New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase 1 (NDM-1) is a carbapenemase that is resistant to ß-lactam antibiotics and has a broader spectrum of antimicrobial resistance than other carbapenemase types. The article explains that healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a significant problem, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, and that carbapenem in combination with other antibiotics are the most potent class of antimicrobial agents effective in treating life-threatening bacterial infections, including those caused by resistant strains. AIM: The survey aimed to gather critical care healthcare professionals (HCPs') opinions on their current practices in managing infections acquired in the hospital and ICU settings, with a focus on CRE cases, specifically NDM-1 and other antibiotic-resistant infections. METHODS: Responses from critical care healthcare professionals, including online surveys and in-person interviews, to gain insights into the management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. The findings related to the insights on the prevalence of bacterial flora, clinical experiences on efficacy and safety of meropenem sulbactam ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (MSE) in CRE cases, and various combination therapies of antibiotics used to treat antibiotic-resistant infections in ICU setting were evaluated. RESULTS: Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria were the most common bacteria in cultures, followed by Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. NDM-1 was the type of carbapenemase found in around 50% of CRE patients. MSE is among the most preferred antibiotics besides colistin, polymyxin B, and ceftazidime avibactum for CRE cases and specifically for NDM-1 cases due to its high rate of efficacy and safety. CONCLUSION: The article concludes with a discussion on the antibiotics used in response to CRE cases, reporting that critical care HCP considers MSE with high efficacy and safe antibiotic combination and was used as both monotherapy and in combination with other antibiotics. The survey highlights the need for exploring and better understanding the role of MSE in the management of CRE infections, especially in NDM-1.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae , Critical Care , Enterobacteriaceae Infections , Intensive Care Units , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Critical Care/methods , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , beta-Lactamases , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Meropenem/therapeutic use , India , Attitude of Health Personnel , Polymyxin B/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Health Personnel
5.
Inn Med (Heidelb) ; 65(6): 566-575, 2024 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743073

ABSTRACT

Outpatient parenteral anti-infective therapy (OPAT) involves the administration of intravenous anti-infectives outside a hospital setting. This shortens the inpatient stay and leads to a reduction in treatment costs, fewer instances of nosocomial infections and enhanced quality of life for the patient.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Humans , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Ambulatory Care , Quality of Life , Infusions, Intravenous , Infusions, Parenteral
6.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 52, 2024 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38764096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Avoiding excessive antibiotic treatment duration is a fundamental goal in antimicrobial stewardship. Manual collection of data is a time-consuming process, but a semi-automated approach for data extraction has been shown feasible for community-acquired infections (CAI). Extraction of data however may be more challenging in hospital-acquired infections (HAI). The aim of this study is to explore whether semi-automated data extraction of treatment duration is also feasible and accurate for HAI. METHODS: Data from a university-affiliated hospital over the period 1-6-2020 until 1-6-2022 was used for this study. From the Electronic Health Record, raw data on prescriptions, registered indications and admissions was extracted and processed to define treatment courses. In addition, clinical notes including prescription instructions were obtained for the purpose of validation. The derived treatment course was compared to the registered indication and the actual length of treatment (LOT) in the clinical notes in a random sample of 5.7% of treatment courses, to assess the accuracy of the data for both CAI and HAI. RESULTS: Included were 10.564 treatment courses of which 73.1% were CAI and 26.8% HAI. The registered indication matched the diagnosis as recorded in the clinical notes in 79% of treatment courses (79.2% CAI, 78.5% HAI). Higher error rates were seen in urinary tract infections (UTIs) (29.0%) and respiratory tract infections (RTIs) (20.5%) compared to intra-abdominal infections (7.4%), or skin or soft tissue infections (11.1%), mainly due to incorrect specification of the type of UTI or RTI. The LOT was accurately extracted in 98.5% of courses (CAI 98.2%, HAI 99.3%) when compared to prescriptions in the EHR. In 21% of cases however the LOT did not match with the clinical notes, mainly if patients received treatment from other health care providers preceding or following the present course. CONCLUSION: Semi-automatic data extraction can yield reliable information about the indication and LOT in treatment courses of hospitalized patients, for both HAI and CAI. This can provide stewardship programs with a surveillance tool for all in-hospital treated infections, which can be used to achieve stewardship goals.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Cross Infection , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Hospitals, University , Young Adult , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Duration of Therapy
7.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 109(3): 116324, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733752

ABSTRACT

We aimed to determine the epidemiology and resistance patterns of Gram-negative bacteria, the risk factors and outcome of bloodstream infection (BSI). In all, 412 episodes in children who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of bacteremia were analyzed. The most common microorganisms were Klebsiella spp. (43.9%), Escherichia coli (13.5 %) and Acinetobacter spp. (10.6 %). Among isolates, 41.2 % were multidrug-resistant, 13.5 % were extensively drug-resistant and 0.4 % were pan-drug-resistant. Carbapenem resistance was revealed in 27.6 % of isolates. Carbapenem and colistin resistance increased over the years. The most common risk factors were the presence of a central-venous catheter and pediatric intensive care unit admission. Clinical response and infection-related mortality were significantly different in cases infected with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative (CRGN) vs carbapenem-susceptible gram-negative bacteria. The increase in multi-resistant Klebsiella spp. seems to be the biggest obstacles in fight against nosocomial infections. The increasing number of CRGN infections over the years affects both the clinical response and mortality rate of BSI.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacteremia , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/mortality , Child , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacteria/classification , Male , Child, Preschool , Female , Infant , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Adolescent , Infant, Newborn , Treatment Outcome , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Retrospective Studies , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use
8.
Korean J Intern Med ; 39(3): 448-457, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715233

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Improved knowledge of local epidemiology and predicting risk factors of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are required to optimize the management of infections. This study examined local epidemiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of liver cirrhosis (LC) patients and evaluated the predictors of MDR bacteremia in Korea. METHODS: This was a retrospective study including 140 LC patients diagnosed with bacteremia between January 2017 and December 2022. Local epidemiology and antibiotic resistance patterns and the determinants of MDR bacteremia were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The most frequently isolated bacteria, from the bloodstream, were Escherichia coli (n = 45, 31.7%) and Klebsiella spp. (n = 35, 24.6%). Thirty-four isolates (23.9%) were MDR, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase E. coli (52.9%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (17.6%) were the most commonly isolated MDR bacteria. When Enterococcus spp. were cultured, the majority were MDR (MDR 83.3% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.003), particularly vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium. Antibiotics administration within 30 days and/or nosocomial infection was a significant predictor of MDR bacteremia (OR: 3.40, 95% CI: 1.24-9.27, p = 0.02). MDR bacteremia was not predicted by sepsis predictors, such as positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA). CONCLUSION: More than 70% of strains that can be treated with a third-generation cephalosporin have been cultured. In cirrhotic patients, antibiotic administration within 30 days and/or nosocomial infection are predictors of MDR bacteremia; therefore, empirical administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics should be considered when these risk factors are present.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacteremia , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Liver Cirrhosis , Humans , Male , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/microbiology , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Female , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Aged , Risk Factors , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Adult
9.
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep ; 12: 23247096241239544, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577758

ABSTRACT

Citrobacter koseri (formerly classified as Citrobacter diversus) is a gram-negative bacillus (GNB) that occurs as an opportunistic pathogen in neonates and immunocompromised patients. Citrobacter species have been implicated in nosocomial settings leading to infections involving the urinary tract, respiratory tract, liver, biliary tract, meninges, and even in rarer conditions-blood stream infection and infective endocarditis (IE). Gram-negative bacilli are responsible for 3% to 4% of all IE cases and have been traditionally associated with intravenous drug users. Patients with non-HACEK (species other than Haemophilus species, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, or Kinglella species) GNB IE have poor clinical outcomes with higher rates of in-hospital mortality and complications. The American Heart Association (AHA) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) both recommend the use of combination antibiotic therapy with a beta-lactam (penicillins, cephalosporins, or carbapenems) and either an aminoglycoside or fluoroquinolones for 6 weeks (about 1 and a half months) to treat IE due to non-HACEK GNB. Citrobacter koseri is becoming more recognized due to its inherent resistance to ampicillin and emerging drug resistance to beta lactams and aminoglycosides requiring carbapenem therapy. Our case is of a 75-year-old male with no previously reported history of primary or secondary immunodeficiency disorders who developed C koseri blood stream infection. His infectious work-up revealed mitral valve IE and septic cerebral emboli resulting in ischemic infarcts. This case illustrates the importance of recognizing GNB organisms as rising human pathogens in IE cases even without active injection drug use or nosocomial exposure.


Subject(s)
Citrobacter koseri , Cross Infection , Endocarditis, Bacterial , Heart Valve Diseases , United States , Male , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Aged , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology
10.
Microb Drug Resist ; 30(5): 179-191, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621166

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates whether random forest (RF) models are as effective as traditional Logistic Regression (LR) models in predicting multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial nosocomial infections. Data were collected from 541 patients with hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacterial infections at two tertiary-level hospitals in Urumqi, Xinjiang, China, from August 2022 to November 2023. Relevant literature informed the selection of significant predictors based on patients' pre-infection clinical information and medication history. The data were split into a training set of 379 cases and a validation set of 162 cases, adhering to a 7:3 ratio. Both RF and LR models were developed using the training set and subsequently evaluated on the validation set. The LR model achieved an accuracy of 84.57%, sensitivity of 82.89%, specificity of 80.10%, positive predictive value of 84%, negative predictive value of 85.06%, and a Yoden index of 0.69. In contrast, the RF model demonstrated superior performance with an accuracy of 89.51%, sensitivity of 90.79%, specificity of 88.37%, positive predictive value of 87.34%, negative predictive value of 91.57%, and a Yoden index of 0.79. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.91 for the LR model and 0.94 for the RF model. These findings indicate that the RF model surpasses the LR model in specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy in predicting hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, showcasing its greater potential for clinical application.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cross Infection , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Logistic Models , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Female , China , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Random Forest
11.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 108, 2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570375

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Intraabdominal infections (IAI) are increasing worldwide and are a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Among IAI, the number of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) is increasing globally. We tested the Unyvero A50® for intraabdominal infections, compared the detected microorganisms and antibiotic resistance, and compared the results with those of routine microbiology. METHODS: We prospectively compared samples obtained from surgical patients using PCR-based Unyvero IAI cartridges against routine microbiology for the detection of microorganisms. Additionally, we identified clinical parameters that correlated with the microbiological findings. Data were analyzed using the t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Sixty-two samples were analyzed. The PCR system identified more microorganisms, mostly Bacteroides species, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus spp. For bacterial resistance, the PCR system results were fully concordant with those of routine microbiology, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the detection of microorganisms were 74%, 58%, 60%, and 72%, respectively. CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with detectable microorganisms. We identified more microorganisms and bacterial resistance in hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infections by using the PCR system. DISCUSSION: IAI warrants early identification of the microorganisms involved and their resistance to allow for adequate antibiotic therapy. PCR systems enable physicians to rapidly adjust their antibiotic treatment. Conventional microbiological culture and testing remain essential for determining the minimal growth inhibition concentrations for antibiotic therapy.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Intraabdominal Infections , Humans , Intraabdominal Infections/diagnosis , Intraabdominal Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Predictive Value of Tests , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Polymerase Chain Reaction
12.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 448, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients infected with Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) bacteremia in hospital have high morbidity and mortality. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of pneumonia and nonpneumonia-related AB bloodstream infections (AB BSIs) and explored the possible independent risk factors for the incidence and prognosis of pneumonia-related AB BSIs. METHODS: A retrospective monocentric observational study was performed. All 117 episodes of hospital-acquired AB bacteremia sorted into groups of pneumonia-related AB BSIs (n = 45) and nonpneumonia-related AB BSIs (n = 72) were eligible. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the independent risk factors. The primary outcome was the antibiotic susceptibility in vitro of pneumonia-related AB BSIs group. The secondary outcome was the independent risk factor for the pneumonia-related AB BSIs group. RESULTS: Among 117 patients with AB BSIs, the pneumonia-related group had a greater risk of multidrug resistant A. baumannii (MDRAB) infection (84.44%) and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) infection (80%). Polymyxin, minocycline and amikacin had relatively high susceptibility rates (> 80%) in the nonpneumonia-related group. However, in the pneumonia-related group, only polymyxin had a drug susceptibility rate of over 80%. Univariate analysis showed that survival time (day), CRAB, MDRAB, length of hospital stay prior to culture, length of ICU stay prior to culture, immunocompromised status, antibiotics used prior to culture (n > = 3 types), endotracheal tube, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, PITT, SOFA and invasive interventions (n > = 3 types) were associated with pneumonia-related AB bacteremia. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that recent surgery (within 1 mo) [P = 0.043; 0.306 (0.098-0.962)] and invasive interventions (n > = 3 types) [P = 0.021; 0.072 (0.008-0.671)] were independent risk factors related to pneumonia-related AB bacteremia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that length of ICU stay prior to culture [P = 0.009; 0.959 (0.930-0.990)] and recent surgery (within 1 mo) [P = 0.004; 0.260 (0.105-0.646)] were independent risk factors for mortality in patients with pneumonia-related AB bacteremia. The Kaplan‒Meier curve and the timing test showed that patients with pneumonia-related AB bacteremia had shorter survival time compared to those with nonpneumonia-related AB bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that A. baumannii had a high rate of antibiotic resistance in vitro in the pneumonia-related bacteremia group, and was only sensitive to polymyxin. Recent surgery was a significantly independent predictor in patients with pneumonia-related AB bacteremia.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacteremia , Humans , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Bacteremia/mortality , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/mortality , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Risk Factors , Aged , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Bacterial/mortality , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/complications , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Aged, 80 and over , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Cross Infection/mortality , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Adult
13.
Med J Malaysia ; 79(2): 115-118, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553912

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Burn injury patients are at high risk of infection as a result of the nature of the burn injury itself, including prolonged hospital stays, antibiotics use, treatment procedures, etc. In this era, nosocomial infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii (A.ba) have increased significantly. This study was conducted to investigate the micro-organism pattern and the risk factors for burn patients with multi-drug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (A.ba) in the Burn Unit at Dr. Soetomo Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study among burn patients with A.ba admitted to the Burn Unit at Dr. Soetomo Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. Potential risk factors for MDR-A.ba were analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. The patients diagnosed with MDR-A.ba wound infection were included in the case group. The patients diagnosed with non MDR, these are: (1) the patients isolated micro-organisms other than A.ba, (2) sterile isolates, and (3) the patients isolated as A.ba but not MDR, were included in the control group. RESULTS: A total of 120 burn patients were included in this study. During this study, 24% burn patients were found to have Acinetobacter baumannii and 79% (from 24% of Acinetobacter baumannii) had MDR-A.ba. According to univariate analysis, risk factors that significant were: Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) (p = 0,002; OR: 6.10; CI: 1,68 - 21,57); hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) (p < 0,000; OR: 6.95; CI: 2,56 - 18,91) and comorbid (p = 0,006; OR: 3,72; CI: 1,44 - 9,58). But, after analysed by multivariate analysis, only ABSI was the significant factor (p = 0,010; OR: 1,70; CI: 1,23 - 2,36). CONCLUSION: Based on univariate analysis, the significant risk factors for MDR-A.ba were: ABSI, hospital length of stay and comorbid. But after adjusted by multivariate analysis, only ABSI was the significant factor.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Cross Infection , Humans , Burn Units , Retrospective Studies , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Hospitals , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Risk Factors
14.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 56(5): 335-347, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436567

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is a nosocomial pathogen causing life-threatening invasive infections with a high mortality rate in some patient populations, especially those who are severely ill or immunocompromised. There is a need for data on mortality in patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia. OBJECTIVE: In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate risk factors for mortality in S. maltophilia bacteremia. METHODS: Studies comparing patients who died from S. maltophilia bacteremia with patients who survived were considered for inclusion. Studies were included if they reported one or more risk factors for mortality. Mortality risk factors included clinical predisposing factors, predisposing comorbidities and appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Nineteen studies with 1248 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Five hundred and six (40.5%) patients died. The following risk factors for mortality were identified: ICU admission, septic shock, need for mechanical ventilation, indwelling central venous catheter, neutropenia, comorbid hematological malignancies, chronic kidney disease, inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and prior antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate antimicrobial therapy had a protective effect against mortality in S. maltophilia bacteremia. Indwelling central venous catheter, neutropenia, hematological malignancies and chronic kidney disease were also risk factors for mortality.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Cross Infection , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Hematologic Neoplasms , Neutropenia , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/immunology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Neutropenia/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy
15.
J Appl Microbiol ; 135(4)2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38515285

ABSTRACT

AIM: During liver transplantation, both hospital-acquired (HA) and community-acquired (CA) intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are involved causing life-threatening diseases. Therefore, comparative studies of aerobic and facultative anaerobic HA-IAIs and CA-IAIs after liver transplantation surgery are necessary. METHODS AND RESULTS: The species of detected isolates (310) from intra-abdominal fluid were identified and classified into hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infections (HA-IAIs) and community-acquired intra-abdominal infections (CA-IAIs). Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii were the most commonly detected species. The resistant phenotypes were commonly detected among the HA-IAIs; however, the virulent phenotypes were the predominant strains of CA-IAIs. Regrettably, the resistance profiles were shocking, indicating the inefficacy of monotherapy in treating these isolates. Therefore, we confirmed the use of empirical combination therapies of amikacin and meropenem for treating all IAIs (FICI ≤ 0.5). Unfortunately, the high diversity and low clonality of all identified HA and CA-IAIs were announced with D-value in the range of 0.992-1. CONCLUSION: This diversity proves that there are infinite numbers of infection sources inside and outside healthcare centers.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Cross Infection , Intraabdominal Infections , Liver Transplantation , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Intraabdominal Infections/drug therapy , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli/genetics , Phenotype , Hospitals , Liver , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
16.
Crit Care Nurse ; 44(2): 49-58, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555965

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia is a preventable health care-associated infection accounting for 1 in 14 hospital deaths. Clinical factors influencing this condition include oral health and bacteria and oral care. This case report addresses diagnostics and clinical variables related to non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia and emphasizes the importance of prevention. CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 90-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and generalized weakness from new-onset atrial fibrillation and suspected heart failure exacerbation. During the hospitalization, her oral health status declined and oral bacterial colonization shifted, with Neisseria becoming the most common oral bacterial genus around the time of development of probable non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia. DIAGNOSIS: The patient had new respiratory symptoms and a chest radiograph positive for pneumonia on day 4 and was subsequently diagnosed with probable non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous antibiotic treatment was initiated. Oral care was completed on only 2 of 7 days. The patient received limited ambulation assistance and encouragement from staff and family members. No dysphagia screening was documented. OUTCOMES: On day 6, the patient was discharged with oral antibiotics to her independent living facility with home health care. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent oral care, early and frequent physical activity, and measures aimed to reduce aspiration risk are key interventions for all hospitalized patients to prevent non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia. Further research is warranted to assess shifts in oral bacteria and general oral health during hospitalization, which could provide clinically meaningful data on risk for non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Female , Humans , Aged, 80 and over , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Hospitalization , Hospitals
17.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 59(11): 1335-1349, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534216

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile is the most common cause of healthcare-associated infection, and severe cases can result in significant complications. While anti-microbial therapy is central to infection management, adjunctive therapies may be utilised as preventative strategies. AIM: This article aims to review updates in the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management, including treatment and prevention, of C. difficile infections. METHODS: A narrative review was performed to evaluate the current literature between 1986 and 2023. RESULTS: The incidence of C. difficile infection remains significantly high in both hospital and community settings, though with an overall decline in recent years and similar surveillance estimates globally. Vancomycin and fidaxomicin remain the first line antibiotics for treatment of non-severe C. difficile infection, though due to lower recurrence rates, infectious disease society guidelines now favour use of fidaxomicin. Faecal microbiota transplantation should still be considered to prevent recurrent C. difficile infection. However, in the past year the field has had a significant advancement with the approval of the first two live biotherapeutic products-faecal microbiota spores-live brpk, an oral capsule preparation, and faecal microbiota live-jslm-both indicated for the prevention of recurrent C. difficile infection, with additional therapies on the horizon. CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of C. difficile infection remains high, there have been significant advances in the development of novel therapeutics and preventative measures following changes in recent practice guidelines, and will continue to evolve in the future.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Humans , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Fidaxomicin/therapeutic use , Incidence , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
18.
Infect Dis Now ; 54(4): 104891, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The WHO's Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) 2017-2018 reported a significant increase in antimicrobial resistance among nosocomial pathogens. This was the first national point of prevalence survey in United Arab Emirates. METHODS: A one-day multicenter cross-sectional survey using a unified web-based platform was conducted in forty-four hospitals across the country from 3 to 23 November 2019 to estimate the prevalence of antimicrobial use and healthcare-associated infections among both governmental and private sectors. RESULTS: All in all, 3657 inpatients in the 44 participating hospitals were surveyed; 51.4 % were on at least one antibiotic at that time. Pneumonia was the most frequently reported hospital-acquired (47 %), followed by intra-abdominal sepsis (10.9 %), upper respiratory tract infections (10.6 %), and urinary tract infections (9.9 %). Ceftriaxone and piperacillin/Tazobactam were the most frequently used antibiotics (13.5 %, 9.6 %). Compliance with guidelines was reported in 70.3 % of prescriptions. Only 11.4 % of patients received a single dose of surgical prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Our results on antimicrobial use and hospital-acquired infection prevalence are comparable to other regional and international findings. Local guidelines are needed to reduce the excessive use of Watch and Reserve antibiotics, reduce prolonged antibiotic use after surgery, and decrease hospital-acquired infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cross Infection , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , United Arab Emirates/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Male , Female , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Young Adult , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/drug therapy , Child, Preschool , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data
19.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 37(3): 221-251, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436606

ABSTRACT

Pneumonia is a multifaceted illness with a wide range of clinical manifestations, degree of severity and multiple potential causing microorganisms. Despite the intensive research of recent decades, community-acquired pneumonia remains the third-highest cause of mortality in developed countries and the first due to infections; and hospital-acquired pneumonia is the main cause of death from nosocomial infection in critically ill patients. Guidelines for management of this disease are available world wide, but there are questions which generate controversy, and the latest advances make it difficult to stay them up to date. A multidisciplinary approach can overcome these limitations and can also aid to improve clinical results. Spanish medical societies involved in diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia have made a collaborative effort to actualize and integrate last expertise about this infection. The aim of this paper is to reflect this knowledge, communicated in Fifth Pneumonia Day in Spain. It reviews the most important questions about this disorder, such as microbiological diagnosis, advances in antibiotic and sequential therapy, management of beta-lactam allergic patient, preventive measures, management of unusual or multi-resistant microorganisms and adjuvant or advanced therapies in Intensive Care Unit.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Community-Acquired Infections , Humans , Spain , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
20.
J Hosp Infect ; 148: 87-94, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521418

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Carbapenems are antibiotics used for serious infections. The consumption of carbapenems has increased worldwide due to increasing microbial resistance. AIM: To investigate the effects of a carbapenem-restricted antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on changes in the resistance profiles of infectious agents, the amount of antibiotics used, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), mortality, and costs. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in ICU between July 1st, 2020 and May 1st, 2021 were divided into two periods: the carbapenem-non-restricted period (CNRP); and the carbapenem-restricted period (CRP) in which alternative antibiotics to carbapenems were preferred during infection. The defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 patient-day methodology was used to calculate the antibiotic consumption. FINDINGS: Of the 572 patients included in the study, 62.2% were male, and mean age was 70.5 years. In the blood culture the most frequently Gram-negative agent was Acinetobacter baumannii (25%). A. baumannii bloodstream infections with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug resistant micro-organisms were significantly different between the two periods (CNRP: 95.6% (N = 22), CRP: 66.6% (N = 8); P = 0.04). There was a gradual decrease in the incidence density and rate of nosocomial infection (P = 0.06), and a significant decrease in meropenem consumption between the two periods (CNRP vs CRP: 21.19 vs 6.37 DDD per 100 patient-days respectively; P = 0.007). ASP yielded US$8,600 of antibiotic cost savings and a total of 14% patient cost savings (P < 0.05) per patient. CONCLUSION: Combining an effective ASP with a comprehensive infection control programme may mitigate the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Carbapenems , Intensive Care Units , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Aged , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , Antimicrobial Stewardship/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...