[Long-term efficacy and safety of divozilimab during 2-year treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' dvukhletnei terapii divozilimabom u patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom v ramkakh randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab (DIV) used as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 500 mg every 24 weeks during 100 weeks for the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked phase III clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS (NCT05385744) included 338 adult patients with MS distributed in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: DIV 500 mg and teriflunomide (TRF) 14 mg. After screening, subjects were included in the main CT period, which consisted of two cycles of therapy over 48 weeks, then entered an additional period from weeks 49 to 100, which included three cycles of therapy. The efficacy was assessed based on the results of brain MRI and registration of data on relapses. RESULTS: 308 subjects completed 5 therapy cycles according to the study protocol. An analysis of the effectiveness of DIV therapy over 2 years showed a persistent suppression of MRI and clinical activity of the disease in comparison with TRF, which was confirmed by all the studied MRI indicators (including CUA; total number of gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions on T1-weighted scans ; number of new or enlarged lesions on T2-weighted scans; lesions volume change on T2-weighted scans; change in the volume of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted scans). The use of DIV was associated with a statistically significant decrease in ARR compared to TRF (p=0.0001). The ARR in the DIV group was 0.057, in the TRF group - 0.164 with 95% confidential interval for the frequency ratio [0.202; 0.593]. The incidence of GdE lesions on T1-weighted scans in the DIV group was significantly lower than in the TRF group. The average number of such lesions was 0.0±0.08 and 1.0±4.46 in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Progression of EDSS was detected in 18 (10.7%) and 36 (21.3%) patients in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p=0.0075). The proportion of patients with relapses was 11.2% (n=19) in the DIV group and 23.1% (n=39) in the TRF group (p=0.0039). In the subpopulation of patients with SPMS, no cases of increase in EDSS were detected, and not a single case of exacerbation was recorded over 2 years of using DIV. Also, DIV has shown a favorable safety profile. Among the adverse reactions (AR), infusion reactions and laboratory abnormalities, such as a decrease in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, were most often recorded. Identified AR were expected, had mild to moderate severity, and resolved without any negative consequences. CONCLUSION: The results of the BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS CT indicate a high sustained efficacy and safety of long-term use of DIV in comparison with TRF during 2 years of therapy.

Teriflunomide in pediatric patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: Open-label extension of TERIKIDS.

BACKGROUND: The double-blind TERIKIDS study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of continuous teriflunomide treatment in the TERIKIDS open-label extension. METHODS: In the double-blind period, children with relapsing MS were randomized to placebo or teriflunomide (14 mg adult-equivalent dose) for ⩽ 96 weeks. Participants received teriflunomide for ⩽ 192 weeks post-randomization in the open-label extension. RESULTS: The mean age at screening was 14.6 years. For teriflunomide/teriflunomide versus placebo/teriflunomide, estimated clinical relapse risk was reduced by 38% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.98; p = 0.11) and numbers of gadolinium-enhancing T1 and new/enlarging T2 lesions were reduced by 43% (relative risk (RR) 0.570; 95% CI 0.33-0.98; p = 0.043) and 49% (RR 0.511; 95% CI 0.34-0.76; p = 0.001), respectively, in the combined double-blind and open-label periods. There was a trend toward reduced risk of 24-week sustained disability progression for teriflunomide/teriflunomide versus placebo/teriflunomide (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.96). During the open-label extension, incidences of safety-related discontinuations were 4.0% (teriflunomide/teriflunomide) and 13.5% (placebo/teriflunomide), including two children who developed pancreatitis in the teriflunomide/teriflunomide group. CONCLUSION: Teriflunomide reduced the long-term risk of focal inflammatory activity, with generally manageable tolerability and no new safety signals. Further evidence would strengthen clinical efficacy findings.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02201108.

Efficacy and Safety of Ponesimod Compared with Teriflunomide in Female Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Findings from the Pivotal OPTIMUM Study.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is threefold more prevalent in women than men. However, sex-specific efficacy analysis for MS disease-modifying therapies is not typically performed. Methods: Post hoc analyses of data from female patients enrolled in the phase 3, double-blind OPTIMUM study of relapsing MS were carried out. Eligible adults were randomized to ponesimod 20 mg or teriflunomide 14 mg once daily for up to 108 weeks. The primary endpoint was annualized relapse rate (ARR); secondary endpoints included change in symptom domain of Fatigue Symptom and Impact Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS) at week 108, number of combined unique active lesions (CUALs) per year on magnetic resonance imaging, and time to 12- and 24-week confirmed disability accumulation (CDA). Results: A total of 735 female patients (581 of childbearing potential) were randomized to ponesimod (n = 363, 49.4%) or teriflunomide (n = 372, 50.6%). Relative risk reduction in the ARR for ponesimod versus teriflunomide was 33.1% (mean, 0.192 vs. 0.286, respectively; p < 0.002). Mean difference in FSIQ-RMS for ponesimod versus teriflunomide was -4.34 (0.12 vs. 4.46; p = 0.002); rate ratio in CUALs per year, 0.601 (1.45 vs. 2.41; p < 0.0001), and hazard ratio for time to 12- and 24-week CDA risk estimates, 0.83 (10.7% vs. 12.9%; p = 0.38) and 0.91 (8.8% vs. 9.7%; p = 0.69), respectively. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment groups (89.0% and 90.1%). Conclusions: Analyses demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ponesimod, versus active comparator, for women with relapsing MS, supporting data-informed decision-making for women with MS. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02425644.

Paradigm shifts in multiple sclerosis management: Implications for daily clinical practice.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory neurological disease. The emergence of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) has greatly improved disease activity control and progression of disability in MS patients. DMTs differ in their mode of action, route of administration, efficacy, and safety profiles, offering multiple options for clinicians. Personalized medicine aims at tailoring the therapeutic strategy to patients' characteristics and disease activity but also patients' needs and preferences. New therapeutic options have already changed treatment paradigms for patients with active relapsing MS (RMS). The traditional approach consists in initiating treatment with moderate-efficacy DMTs and subsequently, escalating to higher-efficacy DMTs when there is evidence of clinical and/or radiological breakthrough activity. Recent real-world studies suggest that initiation of high-efficacy DMTs from disease onset can improve long-term outcomes for RMS patients. In this article, we review different treatment strategies and discuss challenges associated with personalized therapy.

Real-world study of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with Teriflunomide in Nordic countries: Quality-Of-Life, efficacy, safety and adherence outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Teriflunomide 14 mg (Aubagio®) is a once-daily, oral drug approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). While the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide have been thoroughly characterised across an extensive clinical program, we were interested in studying performance of the drug with respect to quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes in persons with MS in a real-world setting. METHODS: Teri-LIFE was a prospective, open label, non-interventional, observational, multi-centre study that enrolled 200 teriflunomide-treated patients from three Nordic countries. The primary outcome measure changes in patient-reported QoL over 24 months as measured by the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Secondary endpoints included clinical efficacy, fatigue, safety, treatment satisfaction (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version 1.4 (TSQM-1.4)), treatment adherence, and health economic outcomes. Most assessments were made at baseline and then at 6-monthly intervals. RESULTS: Overall, changes in SF-36 scores from baseline to last visit indicated a stable QoL during treatment with teriflunomide for up to 24 months. Relapse activity decreased during the study compared to the pre-baseline period (p<0.001), patient-reported disability increased marginally, and no substantial change was seen in fatigue scores. The mean scores for TSQM domains increased nominally though not significantly from Month 6 to Month 24. The convenience and side effects TSQM domains recorded the highest median scores, indicating the acceptability of oral teriflunomide in this cohort. This was reflected in a generally high treatment adherence and decreased healthcare utilization during the study period. Some differences were seen between treatment-naïve and previously treated patients, likely reflecting different patient demographics and disease status at study entry, along with different treatment expectations. CONCLUSION: Teri-LIFE offers a reliable snapshot of QoL, efficacy, safety, and health economic outcomes in persons with relapsing MS treated with teriflunomide in routine clinical practice in Nordic countries The results were consistent with previous clinical trials and real-world studies.

Therapeutic response to leflunomide in combo therapy and monotherapy is associated to serum teriflunomide (A77 1726) levels.

There is a significant rate of therapeutic failure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with leflunomide (LEF). This study investigates the utility values of teriflunomide levels (A77 1726) in identifying RA patients who remained with moderate or severe disease activity after the treatment with LEF. In this cross-sectional study, we compared: (a) RA patients who achieved a DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2, and (b) RA patients who maintained a DAS28-ESR > 3.2 after treatment. ROC curves determined the cut-off of A77 1726 with the better performance to identify patients achieving a DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2. Of the 115 patients treated with LEF, 69 (60%) remained with moderate/severe disease activity and 46 (40%) achieved low disease activity/remission. Higher A77 1726 levels showed a negative correlation with DAS28-ESR (r = - 0.42, p < 0.001) and other parameters of disease activity. We obtained the following utility values with the cut-off of A77 1726 > 10 µg/mL to identify RA patients who achieved a DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2: sensitivity of 91.31%; specificity of 73.91%; positive predictive value of 70.00%; and negative predictive value of 92.73%. Serum A77 1726 discriminated between RA patients who remained with moderate/severe disease activity despite the treatment with LEF both as monotherapy and LEF as combo therapy.

Gastrointestinal pathologic findings of teriflunomide associated diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is generally a benign and self-limited adverse effect of teriflunomide. Small intestinal pathology has yet to be described with teriflunomide associated diarrhea. OBJECTIVE: To report small intestinal pathology in teriflunomide associated diarrhea. METHODS: Small intestinal and colonic biopsies were obtained from a patient with teriflunomide associated diarrhea. RESULTS: Small intestinal biopsy demonstrated blunting of villi, increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and expansion of lamina propria. Gliadin and t-transglutaminase antibodies were negative. Diarrhea resolved following elimination of teriflunomide with cholestyramine. CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of small intestinal inflammation similar to celiac disease in teriflunomide associated diarrhea.

Serological markers exploration and real-world effectiveness and safety of teriflunomide in south Chinese patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Since September 2012, when teriflunomide was approved as a disease-modifying treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis, real-world observational studies on teriflunomide in Chinese patients are limited. METHODS: We collected demographic characteristics and peripheral blood samples at different time points. Clinical symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging data, and concentrations of neurofilament light chains and multiple cytokines at different time points were compared to assess the efficacy. Moreover, the safety was assessed by blood routine, liver and kidney function, and a questionnaire to report adverse reactions. RESULTS: Teriflunomide significantly reduced serum levels of neurofilament light chains and several inflammatory cytokines. After accepting teriflunomide treatment, many clinical symptoms improved, scores of the expanded disability status scale decreased from 2.0 to 1.75, and annualized relapse rates decreased from 1.45 to 0.31. 29 (80.56%) and 15 (78.95%) patients achieved the no evidence of disease activity-3 status after 6 months and 12 months treatment, respectively. Teriflunomide was associated with mild or moderate discomfort, and discontinuation rates due to adverse events were low. CONCLUSION: Serum neurofilament light chain protein is sensitive to teriflunomide treatment, suggesting that it has the potential to be used as an indicator to assess the efficacy of teriflunomide. Teriflunomide can significantly reduce the concentrations of inflammatory cytokines, indicating that teriflunomide may regulate neuroinflammation through the inhibitory effect on a variety of immune cells and their cytokines. Teriflunomide can improve clinical symptoms and disease severity in MS patients in southern China, and patients have good compliance.

Hepatotoxicity associated with the use of teriflunomide in a patient with multiple sclerosis: A case report.

RATIONALE: Teriflunomide is an inhibitor of pyrimidine synthesis available as a first-line treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Drug-induced liver damage is a relevant problem in clinical practice, representing a frequent cause of treatment discontinuation. This case report describes the occurrence of liver injury, with a 33.7-fold increase in the upper limit of normality of the liver enzyme alanine aminotransferase during treatment with teriflunomide 14 mg. PATIENT CONCERN: A 44-year-old woman receiving teriflunomide 14 mg for the treatment of multiple sclerosis presented symptoms suggestive of liver dysfunction 54 days after starting treatment. The patient had no history of using disease-modifying therapy, neither previous liver disease nor other comorbidities. DIAGNOSTICS: The suggested diagnosis was drug-induced liver injury, classified as hepatocellular. Other possible hepatic and autoimmune etiologies were ruled out. INTERVENTIONS: Replacement of teriflunomide treatment with glatiramer acetate and follow-up of the disease. OUTCOMES: Signs and symptoms regressed after treatment with teriflunomide 14 mg was discontinued, with normalization of liver enzyme activity in ∼5 months. The causality assessment of the adverse drug reaction was determined by the Naranjo scaling system, resulting in probable, with a final score of 7. CONCLUSIONS: Teriflunomide-induced liver injury in patients with multiple sclerosis is a serious adverse reaction. The report of this case contributes to updating knowledge about the safety aspects of treatment with teriflunomide and planning of monitoring strategies and patient risk management.

Teriflunomide Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Selectively Modulates CD8 Memory T Cells.

Background and Objectives: Inhibition of de novo pyrimidine synthesis in proliferating T and B lymphocytes by teriflunomide, a pharmacological inhibitor of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), has been shown to be an effective therapy to treat patients with MS in placebo-controlled phase 3 trials. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism contributing to the efficacy of DHODH inhibition has been only partially elucidated. Here, we aimed to determine the impact of teriflunomide on the immune compartment in a longitudinal high-dimensional follow-up of patients with relapse-remitting MS (RRMS) treated with teriflunomide. Methods: High-dimensional spectral flow cytometry was used to analyze the phenotype and the function of innate and adaptive immune system of patients with RRMS before and 12 months after teriflunomide treatment. In addition, we assessed the impact of teriflunomide on the migration of memory CD8 T cells in patients with RRMS, and we defined patient immune metabolic profiles. Results: We found that 12 months of treatment with teriflunomide in patients with RRMS does not affect the B cell or CD4 T cell compartments, including regulatory TREG follicular helper TFH cell and helper TH cell subsets. In contrast, we observed a specific impact of teriflunomide on the CD8 T cell compartment, which was characterized by decreased homeostatic proliferation and reduced production of TNFα and IFNγ. Furthermore, we showed that DHODH inhibition also had a negative impact on the migratory velocity of memory CD8 T cells in patients with RRMS. Finally, we showed that the susceptibility of memory CD8 T cells to DHODH inhibition was not related to impaired metabolism. Discussion: Overall, these findings demonstrate that the clinical efficacy of teriflunomide results partially in the specific susceptibility of memory CD8 T cells to DHODH inhibition in patients with RRMS and strengthens active roles for these T cells in the pathophysiological process of MS.

Teriflunomide: Pediatric First Approval.

Teriflunomide (Aubagio®), which was developed by Sanofi, is an oral immunomodulatory agent targeting the mitochondrial enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase and available to adults to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). On 18 June 2021, teriflunomide received its first approval in this indication in pediatric patients aged ≥ 10 years in the EU. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of teriflunomide leading to this first pediatric approval for relapsing-remitting MS.

Trigeminal neuralgia in a patient with multiple sclerosis: Coincidental? An attack? Teriflunomide-induced?

Trigeminal neuralgia attributed to multiple sclerosis (TNMS) occurs in 2% to 5% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Although treatment strategies are similar to those for classic trigeminal neuralgia, TNMS tends to become medically resistant and require polytherapy. Demyelinating lesions in critical regions are the most common etiology. However, therapies used to treat MS may trigger trigeminal neuralgia, as well as other pain disorders, like migraines or daily headaches. Presently reported is the case of a patient with MS who suffered severe trigeminal neuralgia 5 months after switching to teriflunomide, an oral immunomodulator drug approved for relapsing-remitting MS, and a discussion of possible etiological factors for the development of trigeminal neuralgia.

COVID-19 in Argentine teriflunomide-treated multiple sclerosis patients: First national case series.

We report COVID-19 presentation, course and outcomes in teriflunomide-treated MS patients in Argentina. METHODS: descriptive, retrospective, multicentre, study that included MS patients receiving teriflunomide who developed COVID-19, with clinical follow-up at reference MS centres, also listed in a nationwide registry. RESULTS: Eighteen MS patients on teriflunomide treatment, from eight MS centres developed COVID-19. The mean age was 41,2 years and 72% of them were female; 94% had diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS and 6% presented a radiologically isolated syndrome. Median EDSS was 2 (range 0-5.5). The average time on teriflunomide therapy was 3 years. COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed with nasal swab in 61%. None required hospitalization and they completely recovered from the acute-phase within 7-14 days. All the patients continued their teriflunomide therapy during COVID-19 course. No MS relapses occurred during or after COVID-19 course. CONCLUSION: Our report adds to the evidence that COVID-19 is mild in patients receiving teriflunomide therapy and that continuing with teriflunomide therapy during Sars-CoV-2 infection is safe and advisable for MS patients.

Potential risk of disease modifying therapies on neoplasm development and coadjutant factors in multiple sclerosis outpatients.

Neoplasm development in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) has been widely discussed. The aim of this work is to determine neoplasm frequency, relationship with the prescription pattern of DMTs, and influence of the patients' baseline characteristics. Data from 250 MS outpatients were collected during the period 1981-2019 from the medical records of the Neurology Service of the HUPM (Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar)-in Southern Spain-and analysed using Cox models. Neoplasm prevalence was 24%, mainly located on the skin, with cancer prevalence as expected for MS (6.8%). Latency period from MS onset to neoplasm diagnosis was 10.4 ± 6.9 years (median 9.30 [0.9-30.5]). During the observation period ß-IFN (70.4% of patients), glatiramer acetate (30.4%), natalizumab (16.8%), fingolimod (24.8%), dimethyl fumarate (24.0%), alemtuzumab (6.0%), and teriflunomide (4.8%) were administered as monotherapy. Change of pattern in step therapy was significantly different in cancer patients vs unaffected individuals (p = 0.011) (29.4% did not receive DMTs [p = 0.000]). Extended Cox model: Smoking (HR = 3.938, CI 95% 1.392-11.140, p = 0.010), being female (HR = 2.006, 1.070-3.760, p = 0.030), and age at MS diagnosis (AGE-DG) (HR = 1.036, 1.012-1.061, p = 0.004) were risk factors for neoplasm development. Secondary progressive MS (SPMS) phenotype (HR = 0.179, 0.042-0.764, p = 0.020) and treatment-time with IFN (HR = 0.923, 0.873-0.977, p = 0.006) or DMF (HR = 0.725, 0.507-1.036, p = 0.077) were protective factors. Tobacco and IFN lost their negative/positive influence as survival time increased. Cox PH model: Tobacco/AGE-DG interaction was a risk factor for cancer (HR = 1.099, 1.001-1.208, p = 0.049), followed by FLM treatment-time (HR = 1.219, 0.979-1.517). In conclusion, smoking, female sex, and AGE-DG were risk factors, and SPMS and IFN treatment-time were protective factors for neoplasm development; smoking/AGE-DG interaction was the main cancer risk factor.

Efficacy and safety of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitors "leflunomide" and "teriflunomide" in Covid-19: A narrative review.

Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) is rate-limiting enzyme in biosynthesis of pyrimidone which catalyzes the oxidation of dihydro-orotate to orotate. Orotate is utilized in the biosynthesis of uridine-monophosphate. DHODH inhibitors have shown promise as antiviral agent against Cytomegalovirus, Ebola, Influenza, Epstein Barr and Picornavirus. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 action of DHODH inhibitors are also coming up. In this review, we have reviewed the safety and efficacy of approved DHODH inhibitors (leflunomide and teriflunomide) against COVID-19. In target-centered in silico studies, leflunomide showed favorable binding to active site of MPro and spike: ACE2 interface. In artificial-intelligence/machine-learning based studies, leflunomide was among the top 50 ligands targeting spike: ACE2 interaction. Leflunomide is also found to interact with differentially regulated pathways [identified by KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and reactome pathway analysis of host transcriptome data] in cogena based drug-repurposing studies. Based on GSEA (gene set enrichment analysis), leflunomide was found to target pathways enriched in COVID-19. In vitro, both leflunomide (EC50 41.49 ± 8.8 µmol/L) and teriflunomide (EC50 26 µmol/L) showed SARS-CoV-2 inhibition. In clinical studies, leflunomide showed significant benefit in terms of decreasing the duration of viral shredding, duration of hospital stay and severity of infection. However, no advantage was seen while combining leflunomide and IFN alpha-2a among patients with prolonged post symptomatic viral shredding. Common adverse effects of leflunomide were hyperlipidemia, leucopenia, neutropenia and liver-function alteration. Leflunomide/teriflunomide may serve as an agent of importance to achieve faster virological clearance in COVID-19, however, findings needs to be validated in bigger sized placebo controlled studies.