Depth and distribution of the cure in a resin-based composite cured in a simulated Class II cavity.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect that a stainless steel (SS) matrix band has on the depth and distribution of cure of a resin-based composite (RBC) in a simulated Class II cavity. METHODS: RBC was cured for 20 seconds in a simulated Class II cavity with and without a SS matrix band, and after 24 hours the specimens were scraped back and ground to expose a vertical central plane where Knoop micro-hardness (KHN) mapping was conducted from 0.05-1.5 mm from the band and in 0.5 mm intervals from the top of the specimens. The effect of different angles of the light guide on the distribution of hardness was also examined. RESULTS: KHN values near the SS matrix band were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than within the bulk of the specimen and were lower than those found without the matrix band. Angles of incidence for the curing light-guide produced changes in the distribution of KHN within the specimens, but particularly near the matrix band, and with a 35° angle of incidence, the depth of cure was significantly different from that of normal incidence of the light.

Effects of Different Radiation Doses on the Bond Strengths of Two Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel and Dentin.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of three different radiation doses on the bond strengths of two different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty human third molars were randomly divided into four groups (n = 20) according to the radiation dose (control/no radiation, 20 Gy, 40 Gy, and 70 Gy). The teeth were sagittally sectioned into three slices: one mesial and one distal section containing enamel and one middle section containing dentin. The sections were then placed in the enamel and dentin groups, which were further divided into two subgroups (n = 10) according to the adhesive used. Three restorations were performed in each tooth (one per section) using Adper Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE) or Universal Single Bond (3M ESPE) adhesive system and Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE) resin composite and subjected to the microshear bond test. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Failure modes were examined under a stereoscopic loupe. RESULTS: Radiotherapy did not affect the bond strengths of the adhesives to either enamel or dentin. In dentin, the Universal Single Bond adhesive system showed higher bond strength values when compared with the Adper Single Bond adhesive system. More adhesive failures were observed in the enamel for all radiation doses and adhesives. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy did not influence the bond strength to enamel or dentin, irrespective of the adhesive or radiation dose used.

Influence of Light Irradiation Through Zirconia on the Degree of Conversion of Composite Cements.

PURPOSE: To assess the light irradiance (LI) delivered by two light-curing units and to measure the degree of conversion (DC) of three composite cements and one flowable composite when cured through zirconia or ceramic-veneered zirconia plates with different thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three dual-curing composite cements (Clearfil Esthetic Cement, Panavia F2.0, G-CEM LinkAce) and one light-curing flowable composite (G-aenial Universal Flo) were investigated. Nine different kinds of zirconia plates were prepared from three zirconia grades (YSZ: Aadva and KATANA; Ce-TZP/Al2O3: NANOZR) in three different thicknesses (0.5- and 1.5-mm-thick zirconia, and 0.5-mm-thick zirconia veneered with a 1.0-mm-thick veneering ceramic). Portions of the mixed composite cements and the flowable composite were placed on a light spectrometer to measure LI while being light cured through the zirconia plates for 40 s using two light-curing units (n = 5). After light curing, micro-Raman spectra of the composite films were acquired to determine DC at 5 and 10 min, 1 and 24 h, and at 1 week. RESULTS: The zirconia grade and the thickness of the zirconia/veneered zirconia plates significantly decreased LI. Increased LI did not increase DC. Only the Ce-TZP/Al2O3 (NANOZR) zirconia was too opaque to allow sufficient light transmission and resulted in significantly lower DC. CONCLUSION: Although zirconia-based restorations attenuate the LI of light-curing units, the composite cements and the flowable composite could be light cured through the YSZ zirconia. LI is too low through Ce-TZP/Al2O3 zirconia, necessitating the use of self-/dual-curing composite cements.

In-vitro bond strengths and clinical failure rates of metal brackets bonded with different light-emitting diode units and curing times.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical failure rates and the in-vitro bond strengths of metal brackets bonded with different light-emitting diode (LED) devices and curing times. METHODS: Forty patients were included in the clinical part of this study. A split-mouth design was used, with the adhesive in group 1 cured for 10 seconds with an LED unit (Elipar S10; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif), and the adhesive in group 2 cured for 3 seconds with another LED unit (VALO Ortho; Ultradent Products, South Jordan, Utah). Bond failures during 12 months of orthodontic treatment were recorded. In-vitro performance of the brackets was also compared by bonding brackets to extracted premolars and using the same light units and curing times (n = 20 for each group). The adhesive remnant index was used to determine the bond failure interface. RESULTS: Clinical bond failure rates were 2.90% for the Elipar and 3.16% for the VALO curing units. The difference in bracket failure rates between the 2 LED devices was not statistically significant. No statistically significant difference was found between the in-vitro bond strengths of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings regarding long-term clinical survival rates and in-vitro bond strengths indicate that bracket bonding can be safely accomplished in 10 seconds of light-curing with an Elipar LED and 3 seconds of light-curing with a VALO LED.

Effect of a third-generation LED LCU on microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of different modes of a third-generation light-curing unit (LCU) (VALO) on the microhardness of restorative materials. DESIGN: A microhybrid composite resin (Filtek(™) Z550), a giomer (Beautifil II), a compomer (Dyract eXtra) and a RMGIC (Photac(™) Fil) were used in the study. Three different modes of VALO were tested and a second-generation LCU (Elipar S10) was used as a control. The microhardness (VHN) was measured using a Vickers Hardness tester. Data were analyzed using two-way anova and post hoc Tukey's test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The Filtek Z550 group had the highest VHN values followed by Photac Fil, Beautifil II and the Dyract eXtra at both top and bottom surfaces, however the difference between Filtek Z550 and Photac Fil was not statistically significant for the bottom surfaces (P > 0.05). Of the different curing protocols tested, the VALO LCU in Mode 3 resulted in the lowest VHN values at both top and bottom surfaces (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the high-power mode of the VALO LCU can be recommended for clinical applications especially in pediatric patients, as it can shorten the time required to adequately polymerize resin-based tooth-colored restorative materials.

Load-Bearing Capacity of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Abutments and One-Piece Implants.

Fiber-reinforced composites (FRC) can potentially help in a physiologic stress transmission due to its excellent biomechanical matching with living tissues. Novel one-piece FRC implants and abutments with two different fiber orientations were loaded until failure to assess the load-bearing capacity, fracture patterns, and precision of fit. The one-piece FRC implants showed significantly higher load-bearing capacity compared to FRC abutments regardless of the fiber orientation (p < 0.001). For FRC abutments, bidirectional abutments showed significantly higher loads compared to unidirectional abutments (p < 0.001). The type of structure and fiber orientation are strong determinant factors of the load-bearing capacity of FRC implants and abutments.

Effect of different photoinitiators and reducing agents on cure efficiency and color stability of resin-based composites using different LED wavelengths.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of photoinitiators and reducing agents on cure efficiency and color stability of resin-based composites using different LED wavelengths. METHODS: Model resin-based composites were associated with diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (TPO), phenylbis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (BAPO) or camphorquinone (CQ) associated with 2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), ethyl 4-(dimethyamino) benzoate (EDMAB) or 4-(N,N-dimethylamino) phenethyl alcohol (DMPOH). A narrow (Smartlite, Dentisply) and a broad spectrum (Bluephase G2, Ivoclar Vivadent) LEDs were used for photo-activation (20 J/cm(2)). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was used to evaluate the cure efficiency for each composite, and CIELab parameters to evaluated color stability (ΔE00) after aging. The UV-vis absorption spectrophotometric analysis of each photoinitiator and reducing agent was determined. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons (α=0.05). RESULTS: Higher cure efficiency was found for type-I photoinitiators photo-activated with a broad spectrum light, and for CQ-systems with a narrow band spectrum light, except when combined with an aliphatic amine (DMAEMA). Also, when combined with aromatic amines (EDMAB and DMPOH), similar cure efficiency with both wavelength LEDs was found. TPO had no cure efficiency when light-cured exclusively with a blue narrowband spectrum. CQ-systems presented higher color stability than type-I photoinitiators, especially when combined with DMPOH. CONCLUSIONS: After aging, CQ-based composites became more yellow and BAPO and TPO lighter and less yellow. However, CQ-systems presented higher color stability than type-I photoinitiators, as BAPO- and TPO-, despite their higher cure efficiency when photo-activated with corresponding wavelength range. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Color matching is initially important, but color change over time will be one of the major reasons for replacing esthetic restorations; despite the less yellowing of these alternative photoinitiators, camphorquinone presented higher color stability.

Can Increasing the Manufacturer's Recommended Shortest Curing Time of High-intensity Light-emitting Diodes Adequately Cure Sealants?

PURPOSE: To investigate sealant depth of cure after increasing the curing times of high-intensity light-emitting diode units (LEDs). METHODS: Three sealants (opaque-unfilled, opaque-filled, and clear-filled) were light cured in a covered-slot mold with: (a) three LEDs (VALO, SmartLite, Fusion) for six to 15 seconds; and (b) a quartz-tungsten halogen (QTH) light for 40 seconds as a control (N=10). Twenty-four hours after light curing, microhardness was measured at the sealant surface and through the depth at 0.5 mm increments. Results were analyzed via analysis of variance followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test (significance level 0.05). RESULTS: The opaque-filled and clear-filled sealants cured with VALO for six or nine seconds had hardness values that were statistically equivalent to or better than the QTH to a depth of 1.5 mm. Using Fusion for 10 seconds (exposure limit) did not adequately cure the three sealants beyond one mm. SmartLite at 15 seconds (maximum exposure period without overheating) did not adequately cure the sealants beyond 0.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Among the tested high-intensity LEDs, only VALO at double or triple the manufacturers' shortest curing time (six or nine seconds) provided adequate curing of opaque-filled and clear-filled sealants at 1.5 mm depth compared to the 40-second QTH light.

Interfacial Adaptation of Composite Restorations Before and After Light Curing: Effects of Adhesive and Filling Technique.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of placement technique and adhesive material on adaptation of composites before and after light curing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylindrical cavities (3 mm diameter, 1.7 mm depth) in extracted human molars were restored in 6 groups (n=5) using 2 adhesives--two-step self-etching Clearfil SE Bond 2 (SE2) and all-in-one Clearfil Tri-S Bond Plus (TSP) (Kuraray Noritake Dental)--and 2 composites--Estelite Sigma Quick (ESQ) and Estelite Flow Quick (FLQ) (Tokuyama Dental)--placed with three different techniques: ESQ bulk placed, FLQ lining followed by ESQ and FLQ bulk placed. Specimens were scanned twice using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) before and after photopolymerization of the composite. Gap formation during polymerization or the difference in floor interface (DFI%) and final unsealed interface (USI%) were measured by image coregistration and subtraction on 6 diametrical planes across each scan. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA suggested that both factors (adhesive and filling technique) and their interaction were significant (p<0.001). SE2 showed significantly lower DFI% than did TSP when the composites were placed in bulk, but no difference was found when flowable lining was applied (p<0.05). Within TSP, all filling techniques were significantly different and the lining group showed the lowest values, followed by ESQ-bulk. Overall, SE2 always showed lower UFI% than did TSP, while there was no difference among different techniques within SE2. CONCLUSION: SS-OCT is a unique method to observe the pre-existing interfacial defects and gaps developed during polymerization, which were found to depend on both placement technique and applied adhesive.

Flexural and Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk Fill Materials.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural and µTBS of bulk-fill materials. STUDY DESIGN: Bulk-fill materials SDR, X-trabase (XTR) and TetricEvoCeramBulkFill (EVO) were used in this study. To test flexural strength, 25x2x2mm samples were prepared and tested with three point bending test. To test the microtensile bond strength (µTBS), two blocks (4x4x4mm) were prepared for each material. In Group A+B, acid-etching was applied to the surface of one of these blocks and no acid-etching was applied in Group B. After applying bonding agent, two blocks were placed into the mold and composite resin (COMP; Tetric N-Ceram) was applied with incremental layering. To evaluate the µTBS of primary dentin, the bulk-fill materials were applied to flat dentin up to 4mm. The new blocks and the teeth were sectioned to obtain sticks and the sticks were loaded in tension until failure. Flexural and microtensile bond strength was calculated based on failure load. RESULTS: The ranking of materials with regards to flexural strength values were SDR>XTR>EVO>COMP,respectively. In GroupA+B, the µTBS values were XTR>SDR>EVO and were XTR>EVO>SDR in GroupB (p>0.05). The µTBS values of these materials to dentin were XTR>EVO>SDR (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the use of a bonding agent without acid-etching showed positive interactions between base materials and composite resin and there were no significant differences in µTBS of these materials to dentin.

Effect of Different Thicknesses of Pressable Ceramic Veneers on Polymerization of Light-cured and Dual-cured Resin Cements.

AIM: This study evaluated the effects of ceramic veneer thicknesses on the polymerization of two different resin cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 ceramic veneer disks were fabricated by using a pressable ceramic material (e.max Press; Ivoclar Vivadent) from a Low Translucency (LT) ingot (A1 shade). These disks were divided into light-cured (LC; NX3 Nexus LC; Kerr) and dual-cured (DC; NX3 Nexus DC; Kerr) and each group was further divided into four subgroups, based on ceramic disk thickness (0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 mm). The values of Vickers microhardness (MH) and degree of conversion (DOC) were obtained for each specimen after a 24-hour storage period. Association between ceramic thickness, resin cement type, and light intensity readings (mW/cm(2)) with respect to microhardness and degree of conversion was statistically evaluated by using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: For the DOC values, there was no significant difference observed among the LC resin cement subgroups, except in the 1.2 mm subgroup; only the DOC value (14.0 ± 7.4%) of 1.2 mm DC resin cement had significantly difference from that value (28.9 ± 7.5%) of 1.2 mm LC resin cement (p < 0.05). For the MH values between LC and DC resin cement groups, there was statistically significant difference (p < 0.05); overall, the MH values of LC resin cement groups demonstrated higher values than DC resin cement groups. On the other hands, among the DC resin cement subgroups, the MH values of 1.2 mm DC subgroup was significantly lower than the 0.3 mm and 0.6 mm subgroups (p < 0.05). However, among the LC subgroups, there was no statistically significant difference among them (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The degree of conversion and hardness of the resin cement was unaffected with veneering thicknesses between 0.3 and 0.9 mm. However, the DC resin cement group resulted in a significantly lower DOC and MH values for the 1.2 mm subgroup. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While clinically adequate polymerization of LC resin cement can be achieved with a maximum 1.2 mm of porcelain veneer restoration, the increase of curing time or light intensity is clinically needed for DC resin cements at the thickness of more than 0.9 mm.

Influence of Curing Units and Indirect Restorative Materials on the Hardness of Two Dual-curing Resin Cements Evaluated by the Nanoindentation Test.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the hardness of a dual-curing self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200) and a conventional dual-curing resin cement (RelyX ARC) cured with different light curing units of different wavelengths (Elipar Freelight 2 LED [430 to 480 nm, conventional], Bluephase LED [380 to 515 nm, polywave], AccuCure 3000 Laser [488 nm]) by means of the nanoindentation test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bovine incisors were cleaned and then sectioned at the cementoenamel junction to remove the crown. After embedding in acrylic, dentin surfaces of the specimens were exposed and ground flat to standardize the surfaces. To simulate clinically placing indirect restorations, ceramic (IPS e.maxPress/Ivoclar Vivadent) or indirect composite resin (SR Adoro/Ivoclar Vivadent) slabs were cemented on dentin surfaces. The specimens were sectioned longitudinally at low speed under constant irrigation and then polished. In the positive control group, the cement was light cured without the interposition of indirect restorative material; in the negative control group, after the indirect restorative material was cemented, no light curing was performed, allowing only chemical polymerization of the cement. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 7 days. Nanoindentadion hardness of the cement layer was measured under a 100-mN load. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Although the self-adhesive cement is technically simple, conventional cement showed the best polymerization performance. The polywave LED technology did not differ significantly from other light-curing units. The hardness of the resin cements evaluated was negatively influenced by the interposition of an indirect restorative material; only the LEDs were able to maintain the same degree of cement polymerization when an indirect restorative material was used. CONCLUSION: The photoactivation step is required during the cementation of indirect restorations to ensure adequate polymerization of dual-curing resin cements.

A study to investigate the bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to prosthetic acrylic teeth.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we compared the shear bond strengths of five different adhesive techniques for attaching metal orthodontic brackets onto acrylic pontics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred upper left lateral incisor acrylic teeth with bonded brackets were divided into five groups - composite alone (control), composite following sandblasting, composite held with a mechanical undercut, cyanoacrylate adhesive and Panavia(®). The initial bond strength was tested using the Instron Universal Testing Machine. The fatigue bond strength was tested by subjecting each bracket to 5000 repetitive low-load cycles at 50% of the mean shear bond strength using the Dartec machine at 2 Hz. RESULTS: Cyanoacrylate adhesive statistically exhibited the highest mean bond strength (19·82 MPa). This was followed by the mechanical undercut group (17·69 MPa) and the sandblasted group (17·18 MPa). There was no statistically significant difference when considering the effect of fatiguing (p = 0·238) as well as the interaction between the adhesive technique and the effect of fatiguing on the bond strength (p = 0·440). CONCLUSION: The initial and fatigue bond strengths of the cyanoacrylate adhesive, sandblasted and undercut groups were significantly higher than the control and Panavia(®) groups when tested under laboratory conditions.

Influence of pH change and water storage on the sealing ability of two resin-based root-filling materials.

AIM: To evaluate the Influence of pH change and water storage up to 90 days on the sealing ability of two resin-based root-filling materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four human mandibular single-rooted teeth were instrumented and filled with gutta-percha/ AH Plus or Resilon/Epiphany SE (n=20 per group). Two teeth each were used as positive and negative controls. Specimens were set for 7 days under 100% humidity at 37°C. They were allocated into two subgroups (n=10) according to whether they were tested immediately or stored for up to 90 days in water before testing. Sealing ability was evaluated by passive dye penetration. Absorbance at 630 nm (in µg/ml) was measured by spectrophotometry. The pH values were obtained in triplicate. Data were submitted to ANOVA by post-hoc Tukey's test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Specimens filled with Resilon/Epiphany SE exhibited more leakage than specimens filled with gutta-percha/AH Plus at the immediate time point (p<0.001). No differences were detected between the groups after storage, or between the materials with pH changes after 30, 60 and 90 days (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Gutta-percha/AH Plus provided superior sealing at the immediate time point. Water storage and pH changes did not Influence the sealing ability of tested materials. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that Resilon/ Epiphany SE sealer offered no apparent advantage over the more conventional gutta-percha/AH Plus sealer technique in terms of sealing ability.

Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the marginal quality of composite resin restorations placed in extracted molars either in bulk (4 mm) or three increments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen extracted mandibular molars were selected and two two-surface cavities were prepared in each tooth (proximal depth 4 mm, occlusal width 5 mm). On one side of the tooth, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent) was applied in a single increment; on the other side, Tetric EvoCeram (Ivoclar Vivadent) was applied in three increments: a horizontal gingival, an oblique buccal, and an oblique lingual increment. Each layer was light cured for 10 s with a Bluephase G2 curing light (1200 mW/cm2). Two adhesive systems were employed according to the instructions for use: the single-component etch-and-rinse system ExciTE F (Ivoclar Vivadent) and the self-etching two-component system AdheSE (Ivoclar Vivadent). The adhesive was light cured for 10 s with a Bluephase G2 curing light (1200 mW/cm2). Eight fillings were placed for each test group and all restoration margins were confined to the enamel. After 10,000 cycles of thermocycling (5°C/55°C), the quality of the proximal margins was semiquantitatively directly evaluated with a stereomicroscope at low magnification and a dental explorer using the SQUACE (semi-quantitative evaluation of restorations) method. In addition, replicas were made for SEM analysis, which was carried out four weeks later at high magnification (200X) by measuring the percentage of regular proximal margins in relation to the entire margin. RESULTS: After thermocycling, statistically significantly higher percentages of regular margins were detected for those fillings placed with the etch-and-rinse system ExciTE F than for those placed with the self-etching system AdheSE - irrespective of the evaluation method (Mann-Whitney non-parametric test, p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the resin restorations placed in bulk and those placed in three increments (Mann-Whitney, p > 0.05). The semi-quantitative evaluation by means of a light microscope yielded statistically significantly higher values for regular margin than did the SEM evaluation for all 4 test groups (p < 0.05). Pearson's correlation coefficient for both evaluation groups was 0.87 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The marginal quality of medium-sized Class II restorations of composite resins placed in one increment was similar to that of restorations placed in several increments. The semiquantitative evaluation of the marginal quality with an explorer at low magnification is an effective and rapid method to predict the clinical performance of direct restorations.

Effects of ceramic shade and thickness on the micro-mechanical properties of a light-cured resin cement in different shades.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-mechanical properties of a light-cured resin cement in four different shades when polymerized through a leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic in different shades and thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A light-cured resin cement in four different shades (HV+1, HV+3, LV-1 and LV-3) was selected for this study. The specimens were cured by using a LED-unit (Bluephase®, IvoclarVivadent) for 20 s under a leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic (IPS Empress® CAD, IvoclarVivadent) in two different shades (A1 and A3) of different thicknesses (1 and 2 mm). Specimens cured directly, without an intermediate ceramic, served as control. The specimens were stored after curing for 24 h at 37°C by maintaining moisture conditions with distilled water. Micro-mechanical properties (indentation modulus, E; Hardness, HV; creep, Cr) of the resin cements were measured with an automatic microhardness indenter (Fisherscope H100C, Germany). Twenty groups were included (n = 3), while 10 measurements were performed on each specimen. Data were statistically analyzed by using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test, as well as a multivariate analysis to test the influence of the study parameters. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the micromechanical properties of the tested resin cements (p < 0.05). The resin cement shade showed the highest effect on the micromechanical properties (Partial-eta squared (ηP(2))-E = 0.45, ηP(2)-HV = 0.59, ηP(2)-Cr = 0.29) of the resin cement, followed by ceramic thickness (ηP(2)-E = 0.38, ηP(2)-HV = 0.3, ηP(2)-Cr = 0.04) and ceramic shade (ηP(2)-E = 0.2, ηP(2)-HV = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Resin cement shade is an important factor influencing the mechanical properties of the material. Light shades of a resin cement express higher E and HV as well as lower Cr values compared with the darker ones.

Impact of the distance of light curing on the degree of conversion and microhardness of a composite resin.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the impact of the distance between the light guide tip of the curing unit and material surface on the degree of conversion and Knoop microhardness of a composite resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Circular samples were carried out of a methacrylate micro-hybrid resin-based composite and light cured at 0, 2 and 4 mm distance. Monomer conversion rate was measured using a Fourier-transform Raman spectrometer and Knoop hardness number was obtained using a microhardness tester on the top and bottom surfaces. Data were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Overall, the increase of curing distance reduced the microhardness (p≤0.05), but did not influence the carbon double bond conversion rate (p>0.05) of the composite resin tested; and the top surface showed better properties compared to the bottom (p≤0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The light curing at distance can reduce mechanical properties and could affect long-term durability of the composite restorations. Thus, the use of a curing device with high irradiance is recommended.

Shear bond strength of an orthodontic self-etching adhesive after intracoronary bleaching.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of intracoronary bleaching on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets using self-etching and total-etch adhesive systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 60 bovine incisors, a coronal lingual access was made to clean the pulp chamber and standardise the thickness of the dentine. The sample was randomly divided into four groups (each n = 15): (CT), control group, without bleaching and bonded with the total-etch system (Transbond(™) XT-3M); (CTSE), without bleaching treatment and bonded with the self-etching system (Transbond(™) Plus Self-Etching Primer-3M); (BT), treated with 35% hydrogen peroxide for internal bleaching and bonded with the total-etch adhesive system; and (BTSE), treated with 35% hydrogen peroxide and bonded with the self-etching adhesive system. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine (EMIC). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was verified. The data were analysed using a two-way anova and Tukey test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Significant differences were found, and the self-etching adhesive groups presented the highest bond strength values (CTSE=11.55 ± 2.85 MPa; BTSE=14.14 ± 2.23 MPa). The ARI scores revealed significant differences among the groups; the greater amount of remaining adhesive was observed in the CTSE group, and the lowest scores were observed in the BT group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the self-etching adhesive system, even after intracoronal bleaching, presented satisfactory adhesive strength for the bonding of brackets.

Depth of cure of bulk fill composites with monowave and polywave curing lights.

PURPOSE: To measure and compare the depth of cure (DOC) of two bulk fill resin composites using a monowave and polywave light curing unit (LCU) according to ISO 4049 and using custom tooth molds. METHODS: The DOC of Tetric Evoceram Bulk Fill and Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior were measured using a monowave LED LCU (Elipar S10) and a polywave LED LCU (Bluephase G2). Metal molds were used to fabricate 10 mm long DOC specimens (n = 10) according to ISO 4049. Uncured composite material was scraped away with a plastic instrument and half the length of remaining composite was measured as the DOC. Custom tooth molds were fabricated by preparing > 10 mm long square- shaped (4 x 4 mm) holes into the mesial/distal surfaces of extracted human molars. Resin composite was placed into one end of the prepared tooth and light polymerized. Uncured resin composite was removed from the opposite side from which the tooth was irradiated and the tooth was sectioned mesio-distally. Half the length of remaining cured composite was measured as the DOC. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) for factors material, LCU, and mold. RESULTS: The main effect LCU was not significant (P = 0.58). The interaction effect between material x mold was significant (P = 0.0001). The DOC of the composites differed significantly only with the stainless steel mold in which Tetric Evoceram Bulk Fill showed a deeper DOC than Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior (4.03 ± 0.14 vs 3.56 ± 0.38 mm, P < 0.0001).