Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, or Topotecan Added to Temozolomide for Children With Relapsed and Refractory Neuroblastoma: Results of the ITCC-SIOPEN BEACON-Neuroblastoma Trial.

PURPOSE: Outcomes for children with relapsed and refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (RR-HRNB) remain dismal. The BEACON Neuroblastoma trial (EudraCT 2012-000072-42) evaluated three backbone chemotherapy regimens and the addition of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab (B). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients age 1-21 years with RR-HRNB with adequate organ function and performance status were randomly assigned in a 3 × 2 factorial design to temozolomide (T), irinotecan-temozolomide (IT), or topotecan-temozolomide (TTo) with or without B. The primary end point was best overall response (complete or partial) rate (ORR) during the first six courses, by RECIST or International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria for patients with measurable or evaluable disease, respectively. Safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) time were secondary end points. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients with RR-HRNB were included. For B random assignment (n = 160), the ORR was 26% (95% CI, 17 to 37) with B and 18% (95% CI, 10 to 28) without B (risk ratio [RR], 1.52 [95% CI, 0.83 to 2.77]; P = .17). Adjusted hazard ratio for PFS and OS were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.45), respectively. For irinotecan ([I]; n = 121) and topotecan (n = 60) random assignments, RRs for ORR were 0.94 and 1.22, respectively. A potential interaction between I and B was identified. For patients in the bevacizumab-irinotecan-temozolomide (BIT) arm, the ORR was 23% (95% CI, 10 to 42), and the 1-year PFS estimate was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80). CONCLUSION: The addition of B met protocol-defined success criteria for ORR and appeared to improve PFS. Within this phase II trial, BIT showed signals of antitumor activity with acceptable tolerability. Future trials will confirm these results in the chemoimmunotherapy era.

The Impact of Bleomycin Deficit on Survival in Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Hodgkin's lymphoma is currently treated with a chemotherapy protocol consisting of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine. Due to Brazil facing a bleomycin shortage in 2017, and this drug's high toxicity, this retrospective study evaluates the effect that the absence of bleomycin had on treatment response and overall survival of Hodgkin's lymphoma patients. METHODS: The medical records of 126 HL patients treated between 2007 and 2021 were reviewed and their data collected, followed by grouping into ABVD and AVD groups according to bleomycin use. Data concerning the patient's characteristics, cancer type, and treatment plan were analyzed with proportion tests, Kaplan-Meier curves. univariate Cox regression, and χ2 tests. RESULTS: No discernible differences were found in this study between the overall survival and recurrence rate of patients treated with bleomycin compared to those without. Additionally, there was an increased risk of death in each subsequent cycle of chemotherapy of the complete ABVD protocol, demonstrating a risk of toxicity. Among the variables analyzed, hypertension and the presence of B symptoms were also associated with an increased risk of death, while the use of radiotherapy significantly improved survival. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that bleomycin did not impact the outcome of Hodgkin's lymphoma treatment. Moreover, the increased risk of death associated with its toxicity during each cycle of treatment raises concerns about its role as an essential component of the gold standard for Hodgkin's lymphoma treatment. Therefore, further research and consideration are needed to reassess the use of bleomycin in Hodgkin's lymphoma treatment protocols.

Long-Term Follow-Up of the Response-Adjusted Therapy for Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Trial.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We analyzed long-term results of the response-adapted trial for adult patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The aim was to confirm noninferiority of treatment de-escalation by omission of bleomycin from doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) for interim fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (iPET)-negative patients and assess efficacy and long-term safety for iPET-positive patients who underwent treatment intensification with escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisolone (BEACOPP/BEACOPP14). The median follow-up is 7.3 years. For all patients, the 7-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are 78.2% (95% CI, 75.6 to 80.5) and 91.6% (95% CI, 89.7 to 93.2), respectively. The 1.3% difference in 3-year PFS (95% CI, -3.0 to 4.7) between ABVD and doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) now falls within the predefined noninferiority margin. Among 172 patients with positive iPET, the 7-year PFS was 65.9% (95% CI, 58.1 to 72.6) and the 7-year OS was 83.2% (95% CI, 76.2 to 88.3). The cumulative incidence of second malignancies at 7 years was 5.5% (95% CI, 4.0 to 7.5) for those receiving ABVD/AVD and 2.5% (95% CI, 0.8 to 7.7) for those escalated to BEACOPP. With extended follow-up, these results confirm noninferiority of treatment de-escalation after a negative iPET. Escalation with BEACOPP for iPET-positive patients is effective and safe, with no increase in second malignancies.

Follow-up of the GHSG HD16 trial of PET-guided treatment in early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma.

The primary analysis of the GHSG HD16 trial indicated a significant loss of tumor control with PET-guided omission of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This analysis reports long-term outcomes. Overall, 1150 patients aged 18-75 years with newly diagnosed early-stage favorable HL were randomized between standard combined-modality treatment (CMT) (2x ABVD followed by PET/CT [PET-2] and 20 Gy involved-field RT) and PET-2-guided treatment omitting RT in case of PET-2 negativity (Deauville score [DS] < 3). The study aimed at excluding inferiority of PET-2-guided treatment and assessing the prognostic impact of PET-2 in patients receiving CMT. At a median follow-up of 64 months, PET-2-negative patients had a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 94.2% after CMT (n = 328) and 86.7% after ABVD alone (n = 300; HR = 2.05 [1.20-3.51]; p = 0.0072). 5-year OS was 98.3% and 98.8%, respectively (p = 0.14); 4/12 documented deaths were caused by second primary malignancies and only one by HL. Among patients assigned to CMT, 5-year PFS was better in PET-2-negative (n = 353; 94.0%) than in PET-2-positive patients (n = 340; 90.3%; p = 0.012). The difference was more pronounced when using DS4 as cut-off (DS 1-3: n = 571; 94.0% vs. DS ≥ 4: n = 122; 83.6%; p < 0.0001). Taken together, CMT should be considered standard treatment for early-stage favorable HL irrespective of the PET-2-result.

A combined analysis of two prospective randomised studies exploring the impact of extended post-radiation temozolomide on survival outcomes in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: The optimal duration of post-radiation temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma remains unclear, with no published phase III randomised trials. Standard-of-care stipulates 6 months. However, in routine care, it is often extended to 12 months, despite lacking robust supporting data. METHODS: GEINO14-01 (Spain) and EX-TEM (Australia) studies enrolled glioblastoma patients without progression at the end of 6 months post-radiation temozolomide. Participants were randomised 1:1 to six additional months of temozolomide or observation. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival from date of randomisation (6mPFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. 204 patients were required to detect an improvement in 6mPFS from 50 to 60% (80% power). Neither study recruited sufficient patients. We performed a combined analysis of individual patient data. RESULTS: 205 patients were recruited: 159 in GEINO14-01 (2014-2018) and 46 in EX-TEM (2019-2022). Median follow-up was 20.0 and 14.5 months. Baseline characteristics were balanced. There was no significant improvement in 6mPFS (57.2% vs 64.0%, OR0.75, p = 0.4), nor across any subgroups, including MGMT methylated; PFS (HR0.92, p = 0.59, median 7.8 vs 9.7 months); or OS (HR1.03, p = 0.87, median 20.1 vs 19.4 months). During treatment extension, 64% experienced any grade adverse event, mainly fatigue and gastrointestinal (both 54%). Only a minority required treatment changes: 4.5% dose delay, 7.5% dose reduction, 1.5% temozolomide discontinuation. CONCLUSION: For glioblastoma patients, extending post-radiation temozolomide from 6 to 12 months is well tolerated but does not improve 6mPFS. We could not identify any subset that benefitted from extended treatment. Six months should remain standard-of-care.

Prognostic Value of Baseline Tumor Burden and Tumor Dissemination Extracted From 18 F-FDG PET/CT in a Cohort of Adult Patients With Early or Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the prognostic value of baseline tumor burden and dissemination parameters extracted from 18 F-FDG PET/CT in patients with early or advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or escalated BEACOPP (increased bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with classical Hodgkin lymphoma were retrospectively included. Progression-free survival (PFS) analysis of dichotomized clinicobiological and PET/CT parameters (SUV max , TMTV, TLG, D max , and D bulk ) was performed. Optimal cutoff values for quantitative metrics were defined as the values maximizing the Youden index from receiver operating characteristic analysis. PFS rates were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves, and the log-rank test was used to assess statistical significance. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: With a median age of 32 years, 166 patients were enrolled. A total of 111 patients had ABVD or ABVD-like treatment with or without radiotherapy and 55 patients with escalated BEACOPP treatment. The median follow-up was 55 months. Only International Prognostic Score (IPS >1), TMTV >107 cm 3 , and TLG >1628 were found to be significant prognostic factors for PFS on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that IPS and TLG were independently prognostic and, combined, identified 4 risk groups ( P < 0.001): low (low TLG and low IPS; 4-year PFS, 95%), intermediate-low (high IPS and low TLG; 4-year PFS, 79%), intermediate-high (low IPS and high TLG; 4-year PFS, 78%), and high (high TLG and high IPS; 4-year PFS, 71%). CONCLUSIONS: Combining baseline TLG with IPS could improve PFS prediction.

Neuropsychological functioning during chemotherapy with temozolomide in high-grade glioma patients: a retrospective single centre study.

PURPOSE: starting from a lack of precise and coherent data in literature, aim of this work is to retrospectively study the influence of chemotherapy with Temozolomide (TMZ) on a wide series of neuropsychological functions in a population of adult high-grade glioma patients. METHODS: an extensive neuropsychological battery was administered pre-operatively (T0) and after 6 (T1) and 12 months (T2) from surgery. After full recovery from surgery, TMZ was delivered concomitant to radiotherapy and, subsequently, adjuvantly for 5-day cycles per month. Parametric and non-parametric analyses were conducted to verify the influence of several aspects of chemotherapy on the adjusted scores of each cognitive test at the two post-operative follow-ups. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included at T0; patients with a lower adjuvant TMZ dosage reported a better performance at the visual attention test at T1, and at the deductive reasoning test at T2. Undergoing more than 8 cycles of adjuvant therapy was slightly associated with a better performance at the long-term verbal memory tasks at T2. No other associations were found with the other cognitive tests and autonomy scales administered. CONCLUSIONS: TMZ proved to be a secure treatment with no negative side effects on cognition and on level of daily autonomy, even at the highest dosage used. This is a positive finding which enables clinicians to reassure patients about the absence of significant negative effects of TMZ on their daily life functioning. In this view, eventual cognitive changes during treatment might not be attributed to chemotherapy but to other events such as tumour relapse.

Overcoming chemotherapy resistance in low-grade gliomas: A computational approach.

Low-grade gliomas are primary brain tumors that arise from glial cells and are usually treated with temozolomide (TMZ) as a chemotherapeutic option. They are often incurable, but patients have a prolonged survival. One of the shortcomings of the treatment is that patients eventually develop drug resistance. Recent findings show that persisters, cells that enter a dormancy state to resist treatment, play an important role in the development of resistance to TMZ. In this study we constructed a mathematical model of low-grade glioma response to TMZ incorporating a persister population. The model was able to describe the volumetric longitudinal dynamics, observed in routine FLAIR 3D sequences, of low-grade glioma patients acquiring TMZ resistance. We used the model to explore different TMZ administration protocols, first on virtual clones of real patients and afterwards on virtual patients preserving the relationships between parameters of real patients. In silico clinical trials showed that resistance development was deferred by protocols in which individual doses are administered after rest periods, rather than the 28-days cycle standard protocol. This led to median survival gains in virtual patients of more than 15 months when using resting periods between two and three weeks and agreed with recent experimental observations in animal models. Additionally, we tested adaptive variations of these new protocols, what showed a potential reduction in toxicity, but no survival gain. Our computational results highlight the need of further clinical trials that could obtain better results from treatment with TMZ in low grade gliomas.

Treatment of glioblastoma in Greenlandic patients.

Glioblastoma (GBM), WHO grade IV, is the most common primary malignant brain tumour among adults with a devastating overall survival of 14-22 months. Standard treatment of GBM includes maximum safe resection, radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ), given over a period of approximately 9 months. Treatment and follow-up for Greenlandic patients with GBM are managed at Rigshospitalet (RH), Copenhagen. Greenlandic GBM patients, therefore, travel back and forth to RH, often unaccompanied, and challenged by cognitive failure or other symptoms from their disease and/or treatment. Few Greenlandic patients are diagnosed with GBM annually, but considering the poor prognosis and short remaining lifespan, it would be preferable to limit their travels. TMZ is administrated as capsules. Health personnel at Queen Ingrid's Hospital (DIH), Nuuk, are trained in treating other oncological diseases and handling side effects. Hence, it could be investigated whether administration of adjuvant TMZ at DIH could be feasible after personnel education as well as economic consideration and compensation, in close collaboration with neuro oncologists at RH. In this article, we describe the Greenlandic cancer treatment, and the typical workflow from diagnosis of GBM to treatment to progression.

Cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin in Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to systematically review and critically appraise cost-effectiveness studies on Brentuximab vedotin (BV) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). METHODS: The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science core collection, and Embase databases were searched until July 3, 2022. We included published full economic evaluation studies on BV for treating patients with HL. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) checklist. Meanwhile, we used qualitative synthesis to analyze the findings. We converted the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to the value of the US dollar in 2022. RESULTS: Eight economic evaluations met the study's inclusion criteria. The results of three studies that compared BV plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV + AVD) front-line therapy with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) showed that BV is unlikely to be cost-effective as a front-line treatment in patients advanced stage (III or IV) HL. Four studies investigated the cost-effectiveness of BV in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) HL after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). BV was not cost-effective in the reviewed studies at accepted thresholds. In addition, the adjusted ICERs ranged from $65,382 to $374,896 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The key drivers of cost-effectiveness were medication costs, hazard ratio for BV, and utilities. CONCLUSION: Available economic evaluations show that using BV as front-line treatment or consolidation therapy is not cost-effective based on specific ICER thresholds for patients with HL or R/R HL. To decide on this orphan drug, we should consider other factors such as existence of alternative treatment options, clinical benefits, and disease burden.

Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in a Patient With Glioblastoma Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Short Communication.

BACKGROUND: Temozolomide (TMZ) is an alkylating agent used to treat glioblastoma. However, the pharmacokinetics of TMZ to establish a treatment strategy for patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) remain unclear. In this case report, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and HD removal rate of TMZ in a patient with glioblastoma undergoing HD to determine optimal dosing of TMZ. METHODS: A 78-year-old man with glioblastoma who underwent HD 3 times a week was treated with TMZ concomitant with radiotherapy. One dose of TMZ was prescribed at 75 mg/m 2 on the day before HD and another dose of 37.5 mg/m 2 on the day before non-HD. Peak and trough concentrations (1 hour and 12 hours after dosing, respectively) were evaluated before HD and on non-HD days. HD removal rate of TMZ was calculated based on the predialyzer and postdialyzer plasma concentrations. Furthermore, the TMZ plasma concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The mean plasma peak and trough concentrations ± SD after 75 mg/m 2 TMZ were 2917 ± 914 and 108 ± 17.6 ng/mL, respectively. Those after 37.5 mg/m 2 TMZ dosage were 1305 ± 650 and 53.8 ± 11.8 ng/mL, respectively. The mean HD TMZ removal rate was 84.9 ± 1.9%. CONCLUSIONS: TMZ was tolerable in patients undergoing HD. Based on the data from a single individual pharmacokinetic perspective, the pharmacokinetics of TMZ in this patient undergoing HD were comparable with those observed in patients with normal renal function. In addition, it may be reasonable to administer TMZ after HD because of the high HD removal rate.

Rare complication of doxorubicin-induced complete heart block in a patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma: a case report.

Anthracyclines are associated with cardiotoxic manifestations that are mainly dose-dependent, with onset varying from a few days to many years after stopping treatment. Frequent monitoring for toxic manifestations, early detection, cessation of anthracycline use and appropriate treatment is the key to preventing morbidity and mortality. Complete heart block with doxorubicin use in Hodgkin's lymphoma is rarely reported, and is a severe toxic manifestation necessitating withdrawal or changing of regimen to etoposide + bleomycin + vinblastine + dacarbazine (EBVD), as in this case.

On the challenges of predicting treatment response in Hodgkin's Lymphoma using transcriptomic data.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advancements in multiagent chemotherapy in the past years, up to 10% of Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL) cases are refractory to treatment and, after remission, patients experience an elevated risk of death from all causes. These complications are dependent on the treatment and therefore an increase in the prognostic accuracy of HL can help improve these outcomes and control treatment-related toxicity. Due to the low incidence of this cancer, there is a lack of works comprehensively assessing the predictability of treatment response, especially by resorting to machine learning (ML) advances and high-throughput technologies. METHODS: We present a methodology for predicting treatment response after two courses of Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy, through the analysis of gene expression profiles using state-of-the-art ML algorithms. We work with expression levels of tumor samples of Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma patients, obtained through the NanoString's nCounter platform. The presented approach combines dimensionality reduction procedures and hyperparameter optimization of various elected classifiers to retrieve reference predictability levels of refractory response to ABVD treatment using the regulatory profile of diagnostic tumor samples. In addition, we propose a data transformation procedure to map the original data space into a more discriminative one using biclustering, where features correspond to discriminative putative regulatory modules. RESULTS: Through an ensemble of feature selection procedures, we identify a set of 14 genes highly representative of the result of an fuorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) after two courses of ABVD chemotherapy. The proposed methodology further presents an increased performance against reference levels, with the proposed space transformation yielding improvements in the majority of the tested predictive models (e.g. Decision Trees show an improvement of 20pp in both precision and recall). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the results reveal improvements for predicting treatment response in HL disease by resorting to sophisticated statistical and ML principles. This work further consolidates the current hypothesis on the structural difficulty of this prognostic task, showing that there is still a considerable gap to be bridged for these technologies to reach the necessary maturity for clinical practice.

[Frontline therapy for classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients]. / Traitement de première ligne du lymphome de Hodgkin classique.

FRONTLINE THERAPY FOR CLASSICAL HODGKIN LYMPHOMA PATIENTS. Upfront first-line chemotherapy is indicated for all features of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma, followed by involved node radiotherapy in early stages; the ABVD protocol (doxorubicin (Adriamycin), bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) is the international standard of care. The 7-agent BEACOPP protocol (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine (Oncovin), procarbazine, prednisone) is used in advanced stages in its «escalated¼ version (BEAesc). During the 2010 decade, it has been demonstrated that strategies guided by positron emission tomography (PET) allows optimizing the benefit/risk ratio of the treatment by decreasing the intensity of therapies for good responders and intensifying treatment of poor responders. Thus, early PET response evaluation is now essential to adapt the treatment intensity. Despite these major advances, several issues remain, including the management of acute and long-term side effects of first-line treatments, the better options for refractory patients, the place and optimization of radiotherapy, and the place for new therapeutic agents such as the anti-CD30 conjugate antibody (brentuximab vedotin) and PD-1 inhibitors in the first-line treatment setting.

TRAITEMENT DE PREMIÈRE LIGNE DU LYMPHOME DE HODGKIN CLASSIQUE. Une chimiothérapie de première ligne est indiquée pour toutes les formes de lymphome de Hodgkin classique suivie d'une irradiation des ganglions atteints dans les formes localisées ; le protocole ABVD (doxorubicine [Adriamycine], bléomycine, vinblastine, dacarbazine) est le standard international. Le protocole à sept agents BEACOPP (bléomycine, étoposide, doxorubicine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine [Oncovin], procarbazine, prednisone) est utilisé dans les formes avancées sous sa forme « renforcée ¼ (BEAesc). Au cours de la décennie 2010, il a été démontré que les stratégies guidées par la tomographie par émission de positons (TEP) permettent une optimisation du rapport bénéfice-risque du traitement en diminuant l'intensité des thérapies pour les bons répondeurs et, à l'inverse, en intensifiant le traitement des mauvais répondeurs. Ainsi, l'évaluation de la réponse TEP à la chimiothérapie est désormais incontournable et permet d'adapter le traitement, le cas échéant. Malgré ces avancées majeures, plusieurs problématiques restent d'actualité : la gestion des effets indésirables immédiats et à long terme des traitements de première ligne, les meilleures options thérapeutiques pour les patients réfractaires, la place et l'optimisation des techniques de radiothérapie, la place des nouveaux agents thérapeutiques tels que l'anticorps conjugué anti-CD30 (brentuximab vedotin) et les inhibiteurs de PD1 dans les stratégies de première ligne.

Survival rates of adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent ABVD versus escalated BEACOPP in a resource-limited country: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: The survival rate of adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) depends on the responses to standard chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combined therapy. Resource-limited countries face numerous obstacles in supporting patients with HL who undergo chemotherapy, especially in advanced stages. AIM: To analyze the survival outcomes of adult patients with HL after combined-modality treatment (CMT) with involved-field or non-involved-field radiotherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 90 adult patients with HL who received CMT at Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok between 2007 and 2021. Patients with stage I-IV disease received different therapies depending on their risk group. The risk groups were evaluated according to initial response, bulky disease, and B symptoms. Patients (n = 90) who underwent CMT were followed up for 34.7 months (range, 1-141 months). The median follow-up periods of early and advanced-stage patients were 53.1 months and 23.5 months, respectively. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates of patients with advanced-stage diseases were 85% and 62%, respectively. There was a difference in the 3-year overall survival among advance-stage patients who underwent ABVD (94%) compared to those administered BEACOPPesc (50%), and the 3-year PFS (84%) among patients who underwent ABVD was higher than that among those administered BEACOPPesc (66%). Radiotherapy increased toxicity but did not improve the survival rate. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy administered to patients with advanced-stage adult HL was more effective than BEACOPPesc when ABVD was administered. Our findings are relevant for hospitals with limited resources.

Impact of Extended Adjuvant Temozolamide Beyond 6 Months in the Management of Glioblastoma Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to assess the benefit of prolonging adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) therapy beyond 6 cycles in glioblastoma multiform patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 329 patients in 2 cancer centers in Egypt were reviewed from January 2008 to December 2018 who were diagnosed with diffuse gliomas. Data were collected on patient demographics, presenting complaints, tumor size, treatment modalities (extent of surgery, radiotherapy dose and technique, concomitant TMZ, and the number of adjuvant TMZ cycles), and reported adverse events. RESULTS: In the studied cohort, 105 patients were treated with adjuvant TMZ, 33 patients received <6 cycles (TMZL), 41 patients received the standard 6 cycles (TMZS), and 31 patients received >6 cycles (TMZE). Our results showed the median overall survival in the TMZL arm was 8.47 months compared with 15.83 months in the TMZS arm and 27.33 months in the TMZE arm ( P < 0.001). Furthermore, a median progression-free survival of 6.35 months was reported in the TMZL group versus, 12.7 and 22.90 months in (TMZS) and (TMZE) groups, respectively( P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the extended adjuvant TMZ with a hazard ratio of 3.106 (95% CI: 2.43-14.46; P < 0.001) was statistically significantly associated with a better outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Extended adjuvant TMZ therapy beyond 6 cycles may significantly improve the progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma multiform.

Patterns, predictors and prognostic relevance of high-grade hematotoxicity after temozolomide or temozolomide-lomustine in the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial.

PURPOSE: In the randomized phase III trial CeTeG/NOA-09, temozolomide (TMZ)/lomustine (CCNU) combination therapy was superior to TMZ in newly diagnosed MGMT methylated glioblastoma, albeit reporting more frequent hematotoxicity. Here, we analyze high grade hematotoxicity and its prognostic relevance in the trial population. METHODS: Descriptive and comparative analysis of hematotoxicity adverse events ≥ grade 3 (HAE) according to the Common Terminology of Clinical Adverse Events, version 4.0 was performed. The association of HAE with survival was assessed in a landmark analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict HAE during the concomitant phase of chemotherapy. RESULTS: HAE occurred in 36.4% and 28.6% of patients under CCNU/TMZ and TMZ treatment, respectively. The median onset of the first HAE was during concomitant chemotherapy (i.e. first CCNU/TMZ course or daily TMZ therapy), and 42.9% of patients with HAE receiving further courses experienced repeat HAE. Median HAE duration was similar between treatment arms (CCNU/TMZ 11.5; TMZ 13 days). Chemotherapy was more often discontinued due to HAE in CCNU/TMZ than in TMZ (19.7 vs. 6.3%, p = 0.036). The occurrence of HAE was not associated with survival differences (p = 0.76). Regression analysis confirmed older age (OR 1.08) and female sex (OR 2.47), but not treatment arm, as predictors of HAE. CONCLUSION: Older age and female sex are associated with higher incidence of HAE. Although occurrence of HAE was not associated with shorter survival, reliable prediction of patients at risk might be beneficial to allow optimal management of therapy and allocation of supportive measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01149109.

Longer versus Shorter Schedules of Vincristine, Irinotecan, and Temozolomide (VIT) for Relapsed or Refractory Ewing Sarcoma: A Randomized Controlled Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: The optimal dose schedule of vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide (VIT) in relapsed or refractory patients with Ewing sarcoma requires clarification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed or refractory Ewing sarcoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a shorter d × 5 schedule (irinotecan 50 mg/m2/d D1-5, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 D1) or protracted d × 5×2 schedule (irinotecan 20 mg/m2/d D1-5,8-12, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 D1,8) together with temozolomide (100 mg/m2/d D1-5). Patients were treated every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles until progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 12 weeks (ORR12w). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULT: A total of 46 patients presenting with relapsed or refractory Ewing sarcoma were randomly assigned to the d × 5 (n = 24) or d × 5×2 (n = 22) schedules. Median follow-up was 10.7 months in the d × 5 group and 8.3 months in the d × 5×2 group. ORR12w was lower for d × 5 (5/24; 20.8%) patients than for d × 5×2 (12/22; 54.5%; P = 0.019), but no significant difference was found in PFS (median PFS, 2.3 months for d × 5 vs. 4.3 months for d × 5×2) or OS (median OS, 14.8 months for d × 5 and 12.8 months for d × 5×2). Patients receiving the d × 5 schedule reported more grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AE) than those receiving d × 5×2, including diarrhea/abdominal pain and vomiting/nausea. CONCLUSIONS: The protracted d × 5×2 VIT schedule showed superior efficacy and favorable tolerability compared with the shorter d × 5 VIT schedule in patients with relapsed or refractory Ewing sarcoma.

Efficacy of the VIT (vincristine, irinotecan and temozolomide) regimen in adults with metastatic Ewing sarcoma.

The goal of the research was to investigate if a combination of vincristine, irinotecan and temozolomide (VIT) could benefit adult patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma who had already been heavily pretreated. Metastatic Ewing sarcoma patients had their data retrospectively analyzed. The patients' clinical, radiological and therapeutic data were recorded. Survival analyzes were performed with these data. The study enlisted the participation of sixteen patients. The average age was 25 years old (range: 20-42). The lung was the most prevalent metastatic location (81.3%). Patients had received at least two distinct chemotherapy combinations (87.5%) and palliative radiotherapy (37.5%) before receiving the (VIT) combination. The Median progression-free survival time was found as 3.4 (95% CI, 1.8-4.9) months. Five patients (31.3%) experienced a partial response, while the remaining patients (68.7%) had progressing disease. Thirteen individuals (81.3%) had grade 1-2 adverse events, whereas five (31.3%) had grade 3-4 adverse events. Hematological complications were the most common side effects (87.5%). Median overall survival was calculated as 5.6 (95% CI, 3.6-7.5) months in the patients after the beginning of VIT regimen. We demonstrated the efficacy of the VIT regimen in adult patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma in this research. In these extensively pretreated patients, toxicities were a concern. Metastatic Ewing sarcoma patients have few treatment choices. In patients who have had a good performance status, VIT regimen may be considered for disease control.

Real-world evidence of ABVD-like regimens compared with ABVD in classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a 10-year study from China.

BACKGROUND: Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) has been regarded as the standard treatment regimen for classical Hodgkin lymphoma. In recent years, ABVD-like regimens, which emerged due to shortages and the lung toxicity of bleomycin or the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates, may be favorable, but have not yet been tested. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of ABVD with ABVD-like regimens, which include bleomycin was completely or partially omitted; meanwhile, etoposide or PD-1 inhibitors were added. RESULTS: 5-Year progression-free survival (PFS) was higher for ABVD than ABVD-like regimens in young patients (82.1% vs. 67.0%, p = 0.029), patients with serum beta-2 microglobulin (ß2-MG) ≥ 1.85 mg/L (75.8% vs. 57.6%, p = 0.046), and advanced-stage patients with IPS score 4-7(63.1%, 18.3%, p = 0.038). For elderly (60.5% vs.76.1%, p = 0.089), patients with ß2-MG < 1.85 mg/L (83.1% vs 76.1%, p = 0.282), and advanced-stage patients with IPS score 0-3(84.6% vs. 81.3%, p = 0.476), 5-year PFS for ABVD did not differ from ABVD-like regimens. Elderly patients treated with bleomycin-free regimens showed a better survival trend compared with ABVD (99.3% vs. 61.3%, p = 0.270). CONCLUSION: ABVD is superior to ABVD-like regimens in achieving PFS in young patients or patients with poor prognosis including high IPS score and ß2-MG level. ABVD-like regimens are as effective as ABVD in elderly or low-risk patients including low IPS score and ß2-MG level; elderly patients treated with bleomycin-free regimens exhibit a better survival trend compared with ABVD.