Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.750
Filter
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 180: 111968, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714045

ABSTRACT

AIM & OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude with receptive and expressive language ages in children using cochlear implant (CI) in one ear and a hearing aid (HA) in non-implanted ear. METHODS: The study included 30 children, consisting of 18 males and 12 females, aged between 48 and 96 months. The age at which the children received CI ranged from 42 to 69 months. A within-subject research design was utilized and participants were selected through purposive sampling. Auditory late latency responses (ALLR) were assessed using the Intelligent hearing system to measure P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude. The assessment checklist for speech-language skills (ACSLS) was employed to evaluate receptive and expressive language age. Both assessments were conducted after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: A total of 30 children participated in the study, with a mean implant age of 20.03 months (SD: 8.14 months). The mean P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude was 129.50 ms (SD: 15.05 ms) and 6.93 µV (SD: 2.24 µV) respectively. Correlation analysis revealed no significant association between ALLR measures and receptive or expressive language ages. However, there was significant negative correlation between the P1 latency and implant age (Spearman's rho = -0.371, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that P1 latency which is an indicative of auditory maturation, may not be a reliable marker for predicting language outcomes. It can be concluded that language development is likely to be influenced by other factors beyond auditory maturation alone.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Language Development , Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Reaction Time/physiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Age Factors , Speech Perception/physiology
2.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 144(2): 130-135, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634540

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deaf children with cochlear nerve canal stenosis (CNCs) are always considered poor candidates for cochlear implantation. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the function of the peripheral auditory pathway in deaf children with CNCs, as revealed by the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR), and postoperative cochlear implants (CIs) outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen children with CNCs and 13 children with no inner ear malformations (IEMs) who received CIs were recruited. The EABR evoked by electrical stimulation from the CI electrode was recorded. Postoperative CI outcomes were assessed using Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rate (SIR). RESULTS: Compared with children with no IEMs, children with CNCs showed lower EABR extraction rates, higher thresholds, a longer wave V (eV) latency and lower CAP and SIR scores. The auditory and speech performance was positively correlated with the diameter of the cochlear nerve canal and the number of channels showing wave III (eIII) and eV in children with CNCs. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The physiological function of the peripheral auditory pathway in children with CNCs is poorer than that in children with no IEMs. Postoperative auditory and speech abilities may depend on the severity of cochlear nerve malformation and auditory conduction function.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Nerve , Deafness , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Humans , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Nerve/physiopathology , Cochlear Nerve/abnormalities , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/congenital , Deafness/surgery , Child , Constriction, Pathologic , Cochlear Implantation/methods
3.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(3): 476-479, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591281

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To analyse the demographic and clinical variables in children having undergone cochlear implant surgery because of deafness. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from January to November 2022 at the Centre for Research in Experimental and Applied Medicine laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, in collaboration with the Ear, Nose and Throat Department of Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, and comprised children of eith gender aged up to 10 years who had received cochlear implant. Data was collected through questionnaire-based detailed interviews. Syndromic Hearing Loss, Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss, and Acquired Hearing Loss were identified among the subjects. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Of the 250 cases, 147(58.8%) were boys, 146(58.4%) were aged 0-5 years, 219(87.6%) had prelingual onset of disease, and 202(80.8%) had a non-progressive disease course. In 203(81.2%) cases, normal developmental milestones were seen. Parental consanguinity was observed in 219(87.6%) cases. However, 63(25.2%) patients had a first-degree relative who had a history of deafness. In 170(68%) cases, hearing loss was hereditary, whereas in 80(32%) it was acquired. Meningitis was the most commonly identified risk factor 55(68.75%). Acquired risk factors and family history had significant association with hearing loss (p<0.05). Speech perception significantly improved in all 219(100%) patients with prelingual hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the cases were found to be male, had a prelingual disease onset and a non-progressive disease course. Family history was a significant factor, while meningitis was the most common acquired cause of hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Meningitis , Child , Humans , Male , Female , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/complications , Deafness/epidemiology , Deafness/surgery , Meningitis/complications , Demography
4.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 179: 111930, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children may experience communication delays, irrespective of early intervention and technology. Australian Sign Language (Auslan) is one approach in early intervention to address language delays. Current prevalence of Auslan use among Australian families with DHH children is unknown. AIMS: The first aim was to determine the proportion of families enrolled in an Australian statewide hearing loss databank who use Auslan with their DHH child. The second aim was to explore the relationships between indicators of child hearing loss (bilateral or unilateral hearing loss, degree of hearing loss, and device use: hearing aids and cochlear implants), family factors (maternal education, attendance at early intervention, family history of deafness, and socio-economic disadvantage) and the family's reported use of Auslan. METHODS: We analysed the enrolment data from 997 families who participated in an Australian statewide hearing loss databank between 2012 and 2021. We described the proportion of families who used Auslan with their DHH child at home. The association between indicators of child hearing loss and family factors, and the parental reports of communication approach were examined using correlation analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 997 parents (8.7%) reported using Auslan with their DHH child. Of these, 26 (2.6%) used Auslan as their primary language. The use of Auslan at home was associated with the following indicators of child hearing loss: bilateral hearing loss, profound compared to mild hearing loss, and cochlear implant and hearing aid use compared to no device use. The family factors associated with the use of Auslan were: referral or attendance at early intervention compared to those who did not attend, and a family history of deafness compared to those with none. No association was found between maternal education and socio-economic disadvantage and the use of Auslan. CONCLUSION: This Australian study found a low proportion (8.7%) of families with a DHH child who reported using Auslan. Seven child hearing loss and family factors were considered, and five were significantly associated with using Auslan at home. Children with a greater degree of hearing loss, attendance at early intervention and family history of deafness tended to use Auslan.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Child , Humans , Deafness/epidemiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Australia/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/epidemiology
5.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): e393-e399, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573598

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: Preimplantation word scores cannot reliably predict postimplantation outcomes. BACKGROUND: To date, there is no model based on preoperative data that can reliably predict the postoperative outcomes of cochlear implantation in the postlingually deafened adult patient. METHODS: In a group of 228 patients who received a cochlear implant between 2002 and 2021, we tested the predictive power of nine variables (age, etiology, sex, laterality of implantation, preimplantation thresholds and word scores, as well as the design, insertion approach, and angular insertion depth of the electrode array) on postimplantation outcomes. Results of multivariable linear regression analyses were then interpreted in light of data obtained from histopathological analyses of human temporal bones. RESULTS: Age and etiology were the only significant predictors of postimplantation outcomes. In agreement with many investigations, preimplantation word scores failed to significantly predict postimplantation outcomes. Analysis of temporal bone histopathology suggests that neuronal survival must fall below 40% before word scores in quiet begin to drop. Scores fall steeply with further neurodegeneration, such that only 20% survival can support acoustically driven word scores of 50%. Because almost all cochlear implant implantees have at least 20% of their spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) surviving, it is expected that most cochlear implant users on average should improve to at least 50% word recognition score, as we observed, even if their preimplantation score was near zero as a result of widespread hair cell damage and the fact that ~50% of their SGNs have likely lost their peripheral axons. These "disconnected" SGNs would not contribute to acoustic hearing but likely remain electrically excitable. CONCLUSION: The relationship between preimplantation word scores and data describing the survival of SGNs in humans can explain why preimplantation word scores obtained in unaided conditions fail to predict postimplantation outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Speech Perception , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Speech Perception/physiology , Deafness/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Temporal Bone/surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Adolescent
6.
Hear Res ; 446: 109007, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608331

ABSTRACT

Despite the proven effectiveness of cochlear implant (CI) in the hearing restoration of deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) children, to date, extreme variability in verbal working memory (VWM) abilities is observed in both unilateral and bilateral CI user children (CIs). Although clinical experience has long observed deficits in this fundamental executive function in CIs, the cause to date is still unknown. Here, we have set out to investigate differences in brain functioning regarding the impact of monaural and binaural listening in CIs compared with normal hearing (NH) peers during a three-level difficulty n-back task undertaken in two sensory modalities (auditory and visual). The objective of this pioneering study was to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) marker pattern differences in visual and auditory VWM performances in CIs compared to NH peers and possible differences between unilateral cochlear implant (UCI) and bilateral cochlear implant (BCI) users. The main results revealed differences in theta and gamma EEG bands. Compared with hearing controls and BCIs, UCIs showed hypoactivation of theta in the frontal area during the most complex condition of the auditory task and a correlation of the same activation with VWM performance. Hypoactivation in theta was also observed, again for UCIs, in the left hemisphere when compared to BCIs and in the gamma band in UCIs compared to both BCIs and NHs. For the latter two, a correlation was found between left hemispheric gamma oscillation and performance in the audio task. These findings, discussed in the light of recent research, suggest that unilateral CI is deficient in supporting auditory VWM in DHH. At the same time, bilateral CI would allow the DHH child to approach the VWM benchmark for NH children. The present study suggests the possible effectiveness of EEG in supporting, through a targeted approach, the diagnosis and rehabilitation of VWM in DHH children.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Electroencephalography , Memory, Short-Term , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Visual Perception , Humans , Child , Female , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Male , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Theta Rhythm , Photic Stimulation , Gamma Rhythm , Adolescent , Speech Perception , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/surgery , Hearing
7.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 180: 111923, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636180

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Children with cochlear implants exhibit lower phonological awareness and sound discrimination skills compared to their normal-hearing peers. However, music training has been shown to have a positive effect on speech discrimination and awareness skills. METHODS: Our study included 23 cochlear implant users and 23 normal hearing participants aged 5-6 years with language skills. The aim was to observe the effect of a music-integrated phonological awareness program on cochlear implant users and to compare the phonological awareness skills of children with cochlear implants before and after online training with their normal hearing peers. RESULTS: Results showed that the trained study group scored higher on the Scale of Early Childhood Phonological Awareness (PASECP) after training than the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, SMRT scores increased between before and after training in the study group, and Mismatch Negativity (MMN) amplitudes increased and latencies decreased as a result of training (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that phonological awareness training integrated with music can effectively improve the phonological awareness skills of children with cochlear implants and has the potential to enable them to achieve phonological awareness levels similar to or even better than their normal hearing peers.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Humans , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Child , Speech Perception/physiology , Awareness , Case-Control Studies , Phonetics , Music Therapy/methods , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/surgery , Treatment Outcome
8.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(4): 392-397, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess cochlear implant (CI) sound processor usage over time in children with single-sided deafness (SSD) and identify factors influencing device use. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, chart review study. SETTING: Pediatric tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Children with SSD who received CI between 2014 and 2020. OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome was average daily CI sound processor usage over follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen children with SSD who underwent CI surgery were categorized based on age of diagnosis and surgery timing. Over an average of 4.3-year follow-up, patients averaged 4.6 hours/day of CI usage. Declining usage trends were noted over time, with the first 2 years postactivation showing higher rates. No significant usage differences emerged based on age, surgery timing, or hearing loss etiology. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term usage decline necessitates further research into barriers and enablers for continued CI use in pediatric SSD cases.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Sound Localization , Speech Perception , Humans , Child , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Sound Localization/physiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome
9.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 170(6): 1648-1658, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38329219

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the differences in auditory performance between auditory brainstem implant (ABI) patients with tumor or nontumor etiologies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection from 1990 to 2021. REVIEW METHODS: We included published studies with 5 or more pediatric or adult ABI users. Auditory outcomes and side effects were analyzed with weighted means for closed-set, open-set speech, and categories of auditory performance (CAP) scores. Overall performance was compared using an Adult Pediatric Ranked Order Speech Perception (APROSPER) scale created for this study. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included and underwent full-text review. Data were extracted for 662 tumor and 267 nontumor patients. 83% were postlingually deafened and 17% were prelingually deafened. Studies that included tumor ABI patients had a weighted mean speech recognition of 39.2% (range: 19.6%-83.3%) for closed-set words, 23.4% (range: 17.2%-37.5%) for open-set words, 21.5% (range: 2.7%-48.4%) for open-set sentences, and 3.1 (range: 1.0-3.2) for CAP scores. Studies including nontumor ABI patients had a weighted mean speech recognition of 79.8% (range: 31.7%-84.4%) for closed-set words, 53.0% (range: 14.6%-72.5%) for open-set sentences, and 2.30 (range: 2.0-4.7) for CAP scores. Mean APROSPER results indicate better auditory performance among nontumor versus tumor patients (3.5 vs 3.0, P = .04). Differences in most common side effects were also observed between tumor and nontumor ABI patients. CONCLUSION: Auditory performance is similar for tumor and nontumor patients for standardized auditory test scores. However, the APROSPER scale demonstrates better ABI performance for nontumor compared to tumor patients.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Speech Perception , Adult , Humans , Deafness/surgery , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Child
10.
PLoS One ; 19(2): e0297640, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394067

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to compare the development of pronunciation in South Korean preschoolers with unilateral cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) to that of age-matched preschoolers with normal hearing, a topic that has not been explored previously. In a retrospective analysis, 25 preschoolers with unilateral CND who had undergone a speech evaluation battery, including a pronunciation and vocabulary test, were enrolled. Utilizing the Urimal Test of Articulation and Phonation and customized language ability tests, pronunciation and vocabulary were assessed. The subjects' speech evaluation scores were converted into age-adjusted z-scores using normal controls' data. While vocabulary performance was within normal limits, their average pronunciation z-score was -2.90, significantly lower than both the zero reference point and their vocabulary z-scores. None of the subjects scored above average in pronunciation. Thirteen patients were recommended for articulation therapy, seven were considered as potential candidates for this therapy, and the remaining five were within normal limits. There was no observed correlation between the development of pronunciation and vocabulary. Notably, some subjects' pronunciation scores did not improve, even after serial follow-up during their preschool years. Despite typical vocabulary development, preschoolers with unilateral CND exhibit significant delays in pronunciation. These findings emphasize the necessity for vigilant monitoring of their language development.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Speech Perception , Child, Preschool , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Language , Vocabulary , Language Development , Deafness/surgery , Cochlear Nerve , Speech Perception/physiology
11.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 144(1): 44-51, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38400594

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With advances in cochlear implant (CI) technology, prelingual deaf adults may experience improved speech perception and quality of life (QoL). It is still a challenge for Mandarin-speaking CI user with tone recognition due to CI technology focused on intonation language. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term post-CI auditory performance and social-emotional benefits in prelingual deaf Mandarin-speaking adults and the difference between them and post-lingual deaf adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-five adult implanted ears were included (forty-six postlingual deaf group; nine prelingual deaf group). Post-CI long-term outcomes were using vowels, consonants, disyllabic words, Mandarin monosyllable words, categories of audiology performance, speech intelligibility rating, subjective social-emotional questionnaires. RESULTS: Post-CI auditory performance and speech intelligibility of prelingual deafness adults was significantly inferior to that of those with postlingual deafness. However, both groups presented improved social-emotional benefits, with no significant difference between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adult CI recipients who deaf before the age of 4 can experience benefits in social-emotional life functioning, regardless of their limited auditory performance and speech intelligibility. Therefore, prelingual Mandarin-speaking deaf adults, especially those using oral communication, can be considered as relative indications for cochlear implantation. SIGNIFICANCE: To clarify and validate the benefits among Mandarin-speaking prelingual deaf adult recipients.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Speech Perception , Adult , Humans , Quality of Life , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation
12.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 67(3): 853-869, 2024 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38407093

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Our goal is to understand how the different types of plural marking are understood and processed by children with cochlear implants (CIs): (a) how does salience affect the processing of plural marking, (b) how is this processing affected by the incomplete signal provided by the CIs, and (c) is it linked to individual factors such as chronological age, vocabulary development, and phonological working memory? METHOD: Sixteen children with CIs and 30 age-matched children with normal hearing (NH) participated in an eye-tracking study. Their task was to choose the corresponding picture to an auditorily presented singular or plural noun. Accuracy, reaction time, and gaze fixation were measured and analyzed with mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Group differences were found in accuracy but not in reaction time or gaze fixation. Plural processing is qualitatively similar in children with CIs and children with NH, with more difficulties in processing plurals involving stem-vowel changes and less with those involving suffixes. Age effects indicate that processing abilities still evolve between 5 and 11 years, and processing is further linked to lexical development. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that early implantation seems to be beneficial for the acquisition of plural as indicated by very small between-group differences in processing and comprehension. Processing is furthermore affected by the type of material (i.e., phonetic, phonological, or morphological) used to mark plural and less so by their segmental salience. Our study emphasizes the need to take into account the form of the linguistic material in future investigations at higher levels of processing.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Eye-Tracking Technology , Language , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Phonetics , Hearing , Deafness/surgery
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4451, 2024 02 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38396067

ABSTRACT

Despite the growing use of cochlear implants in deaf patients, there is a lack of data on their knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward cochlear implants. This study aimed to investigate the KAP toward cochlear implants among deaf patients who received cochlear implants. A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2022 and December 2022 among deaf patients who had received cochlear implants. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic characteristics and KAP scores. A total of 526 participants were enrolled; 54.18% were female, 65.40% were above 60 years old, and 61.03% were surveyed at less than 3 years after implantation. The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 8.15 ± 2.18 (possible range: 0-10), 43.63 ± 6.98 (possible range: 12-60), and 41.11 ± 7.42 (possible range: 11-55), respectively, indicating good knowledge, moderate attitude and practice. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that attitude [odd ratio (OR) = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-1.29, P < 0.001] and unemployment (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.17-0.63, P = 0.001) were independently associated with practice. Path analysis showed that knowledge directly influenced attitude (ß = 0.93, 95% CI 0.61-1.19, P < 0.001), attitude directly influenced practice (ß = 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.61, P < 0.001), and knowledge directly (ß = 0.77, 95% CI 0.53-1.01, P < 0.001) and indirectly (ß = 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.66, P < 0.001) influenced practice. Deaf patients who received cochlear implants showed good knowledge, moderate attitude and practice toward cochlear implants. Knowledge should be strengthened to improve attitude and practice toward cochlear implants, which could translate into realistic expectations toward cochlear implants devices and proper care and maintenance.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Cross-Sectional Studies , Deafness/surgery
14.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(4): 2011-2022, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191746

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Despite the recent trend of cochlear implantation (CI) at the age of six or even four months is prevalent in many centers around the world, clinicians should be cautious because perinatal risk factors of auditory neuropathy and/or delayed maturation carry the possibility of reversible hearing loss, yielding better auditory performance at the age of one year. The purpose of this study is to raise awareness that early CI may not be universal for all patients. In addition, we specify the factors to be considered in the pre-operative evaluation of CI in infants younger than one year. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study describes four cases provisionally diagnosed with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss that were presented to the CI clinic to determine candidacy for implantation. Two cases had histories of prematurity, one had Down syndrome, and one had a family history of hearing loss. None of the study cases were candidates for CI, as they had varying degrees of hearing improvement. CONCLUSION: Although early CI may yield better auditory performance, the final diagnosis should be made only after repeated subjective and objective measurements as well as family feedback on the child's auditory performance, especially in preterm children. Early auditory brainstem response (ABR) prior to the age of one year in children with cognitive, neurologic, or developmental comorbidities should be interpreted with caution, as ABR "alone" could not accurately represent the child's true hearing ability in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Child , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/surgery , Deafness/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery
15.
Cereb Cortex ; 34(1)2024 01 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38163443

ABSTRACT

The onset of hearing loss can lead to altered brain structure and functions. However, hearing restoration may also result in distinct cortical reorganization. A differential pattern of functional remodeling was observed between post- and prelingual cochlear implant users, but it remains unclear how these speech processing networks are reorganized after cochlear implantation. To explore the impact of language acquisition and hearing restoration on speech perception in cochlear implant users, we conducted assessments of brain activation, functional connectivity, and graph theory-based analysis using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. We examined the effects of speech-in-noise stimuli on three groups: postlingual cochlear implant users (n = 12), prelingual cochlear implant users (n = 10), and age-matched individuals with hearing controls (HC) (n = 22). The activation of auditory-related areas in cochlear implant users showed a lower response compared with the HC group. Wernicke's area and Broca's area demonstrated differences network attributes in speech processing networks in post- and prelingual cochlear implant users. In addition, cochlear implant users maintain a high efficiency of the speech processing network to process speech information. Taken together, our results characterize the speech processing networks, in varying noise environments, in post- and prelingual cochlear implant users and provide new insights for theories of how implantation modes impact remodeling of the speech processing functional networks.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Speech Perception , Humans , Speech , Deafness/surgery , Hearing , Speech Perception/physiology
16.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 67(2): 618-632, 2024 Feb 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38198368

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to investigate the variability in language development in children aged 5-7.5 years after bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) up to the age of 2 years, and any impact of the age at implantation and additional noncognitive or anatomical disorders at implantation. DESIGN: Data of 84 congenitally deaf children that had received simultaneous bilateral CI at the age of ≤ 24 months were included in this retrospective study. The results of language comprehension acquisition were evaluated using a standardized German language acquisition test for normal hearing preschoolers and first graders. Data on speech perception of monosyllables and sentences in quiet and noise were added. RESULTS: In a monosyllabic test, the children achieved a median performance of 75.0 ± 12.88%. In the sentence test in quiet, the median performance was 89 ± 12.69%, but dropped to 54 ± 18.92% in noise. A simple analysis showed a significant main effect of age at implantation on monosyllabic word comprehension (p < .001), but no significant effect of comorbidities that lacked cognitive effects (p = .24). Language acquisition values correspond to the normal range of children with normal hearing. Approximately 25% of the variability in the language acquisition tests is due to the outcome of the monosyllabic speech perception test. CONCLUSIONS: Congenitally deaf children who were fitted bilaterally in the 1st year of life can develop age-appropriate language skills by the time they start school. The high variability in the data is partly due to the age of implantation, but additional factors such as cognitive factors (e.g., working memory) are likely to influence the variability.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Speech Perception , Child , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Language Development , Deafness/surgery , Treatment Outcome
17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220047

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to assess clinical safety and postoperative audiological outcomes in postlingual deafness Spanish speaking patients, who underwent surgery with Nurotron™ cochlear implant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective descriptive case series study. We performed follow-up of complications and audiological measurements before and after cochlear implantation. Patients with bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss or patients with unilateral deafness with/without tinnitus were included. Repeated-measures within-subjects for assess pure tone thresholds and speech performance (bilingual test) with a detailed monitoring to establish security or adverse effects were performed. Analysis of variance tests, repetitive measures, were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 31 patients were included, 17 (54.8%) men and 14 (45.2%) women. Mean age at the time of surgery was 49.82 ± 18.8 years. The mean follow-up of the group was 31.56 ± 9.57 months (minimum = 19.6 months and maximum = 52.50 months). As major complication one patient (3.23%) had a hard failure that required removal and re-implantation. 25.8% of the patients presented minor complications, the most frequent being vertigo/unsteadiness in 22.6%. The mean of language discrimination (free field at 65 dB SPL) was 62.19% ± 16.66; being 69.82% ± 7.35 in the group of severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. A statistically significant reduction was observed in patients with tinnitus, assessed using the visual analogue scale, preoperative = 7.2 ± 1,6 vs postoperative (18months postoperative) = 1.7 ± 1.3 (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The Nurotron™ cochlear implant shows satisfactory audiological results, in accordance with what has been reported in the literature. Minor complications were similar to previous studies, but the percentage of hard failure should continue to be observed, which was higher than other reports with comparable follow-up.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Adult , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Aged , Cochlear Implantation , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Language , Follow-Up Studies , Deafness/surgery , Prosthesis Design , Tinnitus/etiology
18.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 16, 2024 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss impacts health-related quality of life and general well-being and was identified in a Lancet report as one of the largest potentially modifiable factors for the prevention of age-related dementia. There is a lack of robust data on how cochlear implant treatment in the elderly impacts quality of life. The primary objective was to measure the change in health utility following cochlear implantation in individuals aged ≥ 60 years. METHODS: This study uniquely prospectively recruited a large multinational sample of 100 older adults (mean age 71.7 (SD7.6) range 60-91 years) with severe to profound hearing loss. In a repeated-measures design, pre and post implant outcome measures were analysed using mixed-effect models. Health utility was assessed with the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3). Subjects were divided into groups of 60-64, 65-74 and 75 + years. RESULTS: At 18 months post implant, the mean HUI3 score improved by 0.13 (95%CI: 0.07-0.18 p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the HUI3 between age groups (F[2,9228] = 0.53, p = 0.59). The De Jong Loneliness scale reduced by an average of 0.61 (95%CI: 0.25-0.97 p < 0.014) and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale improved on average (1.25, 95%CI: 0.85-1.65 p < 0.001). Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening reduced by an average of 8.7 (95%CI: 6.7-10.8, p < 0.001) from a significant to mild-moderate hearing handicap. Age was not a statistically significant factor for any of the other measures (p > 0.20). At baseline 90% of participants had no or mild depression and there was no change in mean depression scores after implant. Categories of Auditory perception scale showed that all subjects achieved a level of speech sound discrimination without lip reading post implantation (level 4) and at least 50% could use the telephone with a known speaker. CONCLUSIONS: Better hearing improved individuals' quality of life, ability to communicate verbally and their ability to function independently. They felt less lonely and less handicapped by their hearing loss. Benefits were independent of age group. Cochlear implants should be considered as a routine treatment option for those over 60 years with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ ), 7 March 2017, NCT03072862.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss , Speech Perception , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Activities of Daily Living , Deafness/surgery , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/therapy , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged
19.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 177: 111867, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290273

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric cochlear implantation (CI) provides sound perception to children with significant sensorineural hearing loss and, despite its challenging process, early implantation can enhance children's speech/language outcomes and potentially improve parental quality of life (PQoL). This study aims to examine parental perspectives on quality of life and parenting children with CI. METHODS: This study combined retrospective chart review and parent reported outcomes. Data were abstracted from medical charts of 85 children who underwent CI between 2016 and 2022 at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Parents were administered the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-MCHL), an 8-item self-report assessment of quality of life for parents of children with CI. Multivariate linear regression analyses examined clinical factors associated with PQoL scores. RESULTS: Parents whose children were implanted at less than two years of age reported significantly higher PQoL, indicated by lower AAQ scores, with a mean AAQ-MCHL of 7.6 + 5.7. In contrast, implantation at age >2 years yielded a mean AAQ-MCHL of 16.2 + 9.6. Parents interviewed within one year post-surgery reported lower PQoL, with a mean AAQ-MCHL of 12.3 + 8.8 compared to those interviewed after one year, with 20.5 + 10.4. CONCLUSION: Early identification of profound hearing loss in children, coupled with early surgical CI, may be associated with higher parental quality of life. The beneficial outcomes appear to be potentiated over time. Further research is essential to fully comprehend the impact of CI on the quality of life of children and their parents.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Parents , Deafness/surgery
20.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 177: 111866, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224654

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Emotional abilities (EAs) are particularly important during preadolescence/adolescence, two challenging periods characterized by significant biological, physical, and cognitive changes. The present study attempted to a holistic EA approach in preadolescents/adolescents with cochlear implants (CI) and typical hearing (TH), considering various aspects such as perception, cognitive facilitation, comprehension, and management of emotions. A secondary aim was to identify significant demographic and audiological factors of EA development. METHODS: CI/TH groups were matched for chronological age, nonverbal IQ, gender, economic income, and maternal level of education. Each group consisted of 43 participants (age range 10-18 years). EAs were evaluated by using the multi-trait/method IE-ACCME test. Auditory-linguistic assessments included participants' lexical skills and Matrix performance as well. RESULTS: EA performance for perception and cognitive facilitation did not show any statistically significant CI/TH group differences (p > 0.05). Significant CI/TH differences emerged for emotion comprehension and management: CI group performed significantly worse in understanding emotional blends (t = 2.56, p = 0.014) but better in personal emotion management (t = -2.01, p = 0.048). For the CI group, gender showed statistically significant effects on cognitive facilitation in sensations, with males performing better than females (U = 129, p = 0.018). TH preadolescents showed significantly lower scores in understanding emotional changes in comparison to TH adolescents (U = 125.5, p = 0.01). Emotional blends understanding showed a weak negative correlation with Matrix performance (r = - 0.38, p = 0.013) and a moderate positive correlation with lexical skills (r = 0.40, p = 0.008). Relationships management showed various significant correlations: weak negative correlations with age at CI (r = - 0.38, p = 0.011) and Matrix performance (r = - 0.36, p = 0.016) as well as weak positive correlations with nonverbal-IQ (r = 0.38, p = 0.013) and positive moderate correlations with lexical skills (r = 0.49, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation seems to show significant positive effects on emotional development in children, allowing them to achieve age appropriate EAs as they grow up and become preadolescents/adolescents. EA assessment in CI users may not only support monitorization of EA trajectory, but also early identification of any EA disorders, so that subjects with low EA profiles could be timely and properly intervened.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Speech Perception , Male , Child , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Emotions
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...