Decompressive craniectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

Malignant stroke occurs in a subgroup of patients suffering from ischemic cerebral infarction and is characterized by neurological deterioration due to progressive edema, raised intracranial pressure, and cerebral herniation. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical technique aiming to open the "closed box" represented by the non-expandable skull in cases of refractory intracranial hypertension. It is a valuable modality in the armamentarium to treat patients with malignant stroke: the life-saving effect has been proven for both supratentorial and infratentorial DC in virtually all age groups. This leaves physicians with the difficult task to decide who will require early or preemptive surgery and who might benefit from postponing surgery until clear evidence of deterioration evolves. Together with the patient's relatives, physicians also have to ascertain whether the patient will have acceptable disability and quality of life in his or her presumed perception, based on preoperative predictions. This complex decision-making process can only be managed with interdisciplinary efforts and should be supported by continued research in the age of personalized medicine.

Decompressing rescue personnel during Australian submarine rescue operations.

INTRODUCTION: Personnel rescuing survivors from a pressurized, distressed Royal Australian Navy (RAN) submarine may themselves accumulate a decompression obligation, which may exceed the bottom time limits of the Defense and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine (DCIEM) Air and In-Water Oxygen Decompression tables (DCIEM Table 1 and 2) presently used by the RAN. This study compared DCIEM Table 2 with alternative decompression tables with longer bottom times: United States Navy XVALSS_DISSUB 7, VVAL-18M and Royal Navy 14 Modified tables. METHODS: Estimated probability of decompression sickness (PDCS), the units pulmonary oxygen toxicity dose (UPTD), the volume of oxygen required and the total decompression time were calculated for hypothetical single and repetitive exposures to 253 kPa air pressure for various bottom times and prescribed decompression schedules. RESULTS: Compared to DCIEM Table 2, XVALSS_DISSUB 7 single and repetitive schedules had lower estimated PDCS, which came at the cost of longer oxygen decompressions. For single exposures, DCIEM schedules had PDCS estimates ranging from 1.8% to 6.4% with 0 to 101 UPTD and XVALSS_DISSUB 7 schedules had PDCS of less than 3.1%, with 36 to 350 UPTD. CONCLUSIONS: The XVALSS_DISSUB 7 table was specifically designed for submarine rescue and, unlike DCIEM Table 2, has schedules for the estimated maximum required bottom times at 253 kPa. Adopting these tables may negate the requirement for saturation decompression of rescue personnel exceeding DCIEM limits.

Decompressing recompression chamber attendants during Australian submarine rescue operations.

INTRODUCTION: Inside chamber attendants rescuing survivors from a pressurised, distressed submarine may themselves accumulate a decompression obligation which may exceed the limits of Defense and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine tables presently used by the Royal Australian Navy. This study assessed the probability of decompression sickness (PDCS) for medical attendants supervising survivors undergoing oxygen-accelerated saturation decompression according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 17.11 table. METHODS: Estimated probability of decompression sickness (PDCS), the units pulmonary oxygen toxicity dose (UPTD) and the volume of oxygen required were calculated for attendants breathing air during the NOAA table compared with the introduction of various periods of oxygen breathing. RESULTS: The PDCS in medical attendants breathing air whilst supervising survivors receiving NOAA decompression is up to 4.5%. For the longest predicted profile (830 minutes at 253 kPa) oxygen breathing at 30, 60 and 90 minutes at 132 kPa partial pressure of oxygen reduced the air-breathing-associated PDCS to less than 3.1 %, 2.1% and 1.4% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of at least one incident of DCS among attendants, with consequent strain on resources, is high if attendants breathe air throughout their exposure. The introduction of 90 minutes of oxygen breathing greatly reduces the probability of this interruption to rescue operations.

USN Treatment Table 9.

The United States Navy (USN) introduced Treatment Table 9 (USN TT9) in 1999. Its purpose is to provide a dosing protocol for cases of incomplete resolution of decompression sickness (DCS) and arterial gas embolism following initial provision of USN Treatment Table 6 (USN TT6). It also can be used for several non-diving-related acute toxicities. Prior to USN TT9, it was and remains common to use USN Treatment Table 5 (USN TT5) for 'follow-up' therapy. An exception might be cases of severe residual neurologic injury, where some prefer to repeat USN TT6. The primary role of USN TT5, however, is for treatment of 'pain only' (Type 1) DCS that has fully resolved within 10 minutes of the first oxygen breathing period at 60 feet of seawater (fsw) (284 kPa). It is thought helpful here to point out that USN TT9 offers certain safety and operational advantages over USN TT5. As USN TT9 employs a maximum pressure of 243 kPa, a marked risk reduction exists for the injured diver in terms of CNS oxygen toxicity. Seizures are reported during treatment of divers using US Navy protocols, some as early as the second and in one case during the first oxygen breathing period at 284 kPa (Mitchell SJ, personal communication, 2016). The inside attendant likewise enjoys an iatrogenic DCS risk reduction. While air breathing exposure time at 60 fsw on USN TT5 appears modest at first blush, the table can be extended at 30 fsw (203 kPa) for two additional oxygen/air cycles. Such extensions result in a not inconsiderable total exposure time of three hours. DCS risk is also increased if the treatment represents a repetitive dive for the attendant, a not uncommon event. Given the ongoing occurrence of inside attendant DCS, in some cases career ending and twice with fatal outcome, its mitigation should be aggressively pursued (author's personal files). From an operational perspective, both treatment pressure and sequencing of oxygen/air breathing cycles during delivery of USN TT9 are essentially identical to that commonly employed during multiplace chamber delivery of hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Accordingly, it is straightforward enough to incorporate follow-up decompression illness cases into daily clinical practice. Not having this dosing 'match', i.e., using USN TT5, might otherwise disrupt regularly scheduled cases. In my capacity as a medical claims adjudicator and clinical resource, I am involved, to varying degrees, in more than 300 cases of decompression illness each year. In those involving more than a single treatment, it is very much the exception, even after 17 years since its introduction, that USN TT9 is employed. The primary purpose of this correspondence, then, is to make mention of the advantages of USN TT9 and remind providers that it is indeed a standard of care in cases of incomplete relief for those who choose to base decompression injury management decisions on USN treatment procedures.

User settings on dive computers: reliability in aiding conservative diving.

INTRODUCTION: Divers can make adjustments to diving computers when they may need or want to dive more conservatively (e.g., diving with a persistent (patent) foramen ovale). Information describing the effects of these alterations or how they compare to other methods, such as using enriched air nitrox (EANx) with air dive planning tools, is lacking. METHODS: Seven models of dive computer from four manufacturers (Mares, Suunto, Oceanic and UWATEC) were subjected to single square-wave compression profiles (maximum depth: 20 or 40 metres' sea water, msw), single multi-level profiles (maximum depth: 30 msw; stops at 15 and 6 msw), and multi-dive series (two dives to 30 msw followed by one to 20 msw). Adjustable settings were employed for each dive profile; some modified profiles were compared against stand-alone use of EANx. RESULTS: Dives were shorter or indicated longer decompression obligations when conservative settings were applied. However, some computers in default settings produced more conservative dives than others that had been modified. Some computer-generated penalties were greater than when using EANx alone, particularly at partial pressures of oxygen (PO2) below 1.40 bar. Some computers 'locked out' during the multi-dive series; others would continue to support decompression with, in some cases, automatically-reduced levels of conservatism. Changing reduced gradient bubble model values on Suunto computers produced few differences. DISCUSSION: The range of possible adjustments and the non-standard computer response to them complicates the ability to provide accurate guidance to divers wanting to dive more conservatively. The use of EANx alone may not always generate satisfactory levels of conservatism.

Endoscopic ultrasonography guided drainage: summary of consortium meeting, May 21, 2012, San Diego, California.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the preferred procedure for biliary and pancreatic drainage. While ERCP is successful in about 95% of cases, a small subset of cases are unsuccessful due to altered anatomy, peri-ampullary pathology, or malignant obstruction. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage is a promising technique for biliary, pancreatic and recently gallbladder decompression, which provides multiple advantages over percutaneous or surgical biliary drainage. Multiple retrospective and some prospective studies have shown endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage to be safe and effective. Based on the currently reported literature, regardless of the approach, the cumulative success rate is 84%-93% with an overall complication rate of 16%-35%. endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage seems a viable therapeutic modality for failed conventional drainage when performed by highly skilled advanced endoscopists at tertiary centers with expertise in both echo-endoscopy and therapeutic endoscopy.

Measurement and modeling of oxygen content in a demand constant mass ratio injection rebreather.

Mechanical semi-closed rebreathers do not need oxygen sensors for their functions, thereby reducing the complexity of the system. However, testing and modeling are necessary in order to determine operational limits as well as the decompression obligation and to avoid hyperoxia and hypoxia. Two models for predicting the oxygen fraction in a demand constant mass ratio injection (DCMRI) rebreather for underwater use were compiled and compared. The model validity was tested with an IS-MIX, Interspiro AB rebreather using a metabolic simulator connected to a breathing machine inside a water-filled pressure chamber. The testing schedule ranged from 0.5-liter (L) to 3-liter tidal volumes, breathing frequencies from five to 25 breaths/minute and oxygen consumptions from 0.5 L/minute to 4 L/minute. Tests were carried out at surface and pressure profiles ranging to 920 kPa(a) (81 meters of sea water, 266 feet of sea water). The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the single-compartment model was 2.4 percent-units of oxygen for the surface test with the 30% dosage setting but was otherwise below 1% unit. For the multicompartment model the RMSE was below 1% unit of oxygen for all tests. It is believed that these models will aid divers in operational settings and may constitute a helpful tool when developing semi-closed rebreathing apparatuses.

Submarine 'safe to escape' studies in man.

The Royal Navy requires reliable advice on the safe limits of escape from a distressed submarine (DISSUB). Flooding in a DISSUB may cause a rise in ambient pressure, increasing the risk of decompression sickness (DCS) and decreasing the maximum depth from which it is safe to escape. The aim of this study was to investigate the pressure/depth limits to escape following saturation at raised ambient pressure. Exposure to saturation pressures up to 1.6 bar (a) (160 kPa) (n = 38); escapes from depths down to 120 meters of sea water (msw) (n = 254) and a combination of saturation followed by escape (n = 90) was carried out in the QinetiQ Submarine Escape Simulator, Alverstoke, United Kingdom. Doppler ultrasound monitoring was used to judge the severity of decompression stress. The trials confirmed the previously untested advice, in the Guardbook, that if a DISSUB was lying at a depth of 90 msw, then it was safe to escape when the pressure in the DISSUB was 1.5 bar (a), but also indicated that this advice may be overly conservative. This study demonstrated that the upper DISSUB saturation pressure limit to safe escape from 90 msw was 1.6 bar (a), resulting in two cases of DCS.

Diving at altitude: from definition to practice.

Diving above sea level has different motivations for recreational, military, commercial and scientific activities. Despite the apparently wide practice of inland diving, there are three major discrepancies about diving at altitude: threshold elevation that requires changes in sea level procedures; upper altitude limit of the applicability of these modifications; and independent validation of altitude adaptation methods of decompression algorithms. The first problem is solved by converting the normal fluctuation in barometric pressure to an altitude equivalent. Based on the barometric variations recorded from a meteorological center, it is possible to suggest 600 meters as a threshold for classifying a dive as an "altitude" dive. The second problem is solved by proposing the threshold altitude of aviation (2,400 meters) to classify "high" altitude dives. The DAN (Divers Alert Network) Europe diving database (DB) is analyzed to solve the third problem. The database consists of 65,050 dives collected from different dive computers. A total of 1,467 dives were found to be classified as altitude dives. However, by checking the elevation according to the logged geographical coordinates, 1,284 dives were disqualified because the altitude setting had been used as a conservative setting by the dive computer despite the fact that the dive was made at sea level. Furthermore, according to the description put forward in this manuscript, 72 dives were disqualified because the surface level elevation is lower than 600 meters. The number of field data (111 dives) is still very low to use for the validation of any particular method of altitude adaptation concerning decompression algorithms.

Decompression tables for inside chamber attendants working at altitude.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) multiplace chamber inside attendants (IAs) are at risk for decompression sickness (DCS). Standard decompression tables are formulated for sea-level use, not for use at altitude. METHODS: At Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center (Denver, Colorado, 5,924 feet above sea level) and Intermountain Medical Center (Murray, Utah, 4,500 feet), the decompression obligation for IAs is managed with U.S. Navy Standard Air Tables corrected for altitude, Bühlmann Tables, and the Nobendem© calculator. IAs also breathe supplemental oxygen while compressed. Presbyterian/St. Luke's (0.83 atmospheres absolute/atm abs) uses gauge pressure, uncorrected for altitude, at 45 feet of sea water (fsw) (2.2 atm abs) for routine wound care HBO2 and 66 fsw (2.8 atm abs) for carbon monoxide/cyanide poisoning. Presbyterian/St. Luke's provides oxygen breathing for the IAs at 2.2 atm abs. At Intermountain (0.86 atm abs), HBO2 is provided at 2.0 atm abs for routine treatments and 3.0 atm abs for carbon monoxide poisoning. Intermountain IAs breathe intermittent 50% nitrogen/50% oxygen at 3.0 atm abs and 100% oxygen at 2.0 atm abs. The chamber profiles include a safety stop. RESULTS: From 1990-2013, Presbyterian/St. Luke's had 26,900 total IA exposures: 25,991 at 45 fsw (2.2 atm abs) and 646 at 66 fsw (2.8 atm abs); there have been four cases of IA DCS. From 2008-2013, Intermountain had 1,847 IA exposures: 1,832 at 2 atm abs and 15 at 3 atm abs, with one case of IA DCS. At both facilities, DCS incidents occurred soon after the chambers were placed into service. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, chamber inside attendant risk for DCS at increased altitude is low when the inside attendants breathe supplemental oxygen.

A case-control study evaluating relative risk factors for decompression sickness: a research report.

BACKGROUND: Factors contributing to the pathogenesis of decompression sickness (DCS) in divers have been described in many studies. However, relative importance of these factors has not been reported. METHODS: In this case-control study, we compared the diving profiles of divers experiencing DCS with those of a control group. The DCS group comprised 35 recreational scuba divers who were diagnosed by physicians as having DCS. The control group consisted of 324 apparently healthy recreational divers. All divers conducted their dives from 2009 to 2011. The questionnaire consisted of 33 items about an individual's diving profile, physical condition and activities before, during and just after the dive. To simplify dive parameters, the dive site was limited to Izu Osezaki. Odds ratios and multiple logistic regression were used for the analysis. RESULTS: Odds ratios revealed several items as dive and health factors associated with DCS. The major items were as follows: shortness of breath after heavy exercise during the dive (OR = 12.12), dehydration (OR = 10.63), and maximum dive depth > 30 msw (OR = 7.18). Results of logistic regression were similar to those by odds ratio analysis. CONCLUSION: We assessed the relative weights of the surveyed dive and health factors associated with DCS. Because results of several factors conflict with previous studies, future studies are needed.

Oxygen exposure and toxicity in recreational technical divers.

INTRODUCTION: Central nervous system oxygen toxicity is a recognised risk in recreational open-circuit scuba diving with the use of nitrox (oxygen-enriched air mixtures), but other forms of oxygen toxicity in other diving settings are poorly understood. However, divers using constant partial pressure of oxygen closed-circuit rebreathers (CCRs) for multi-day, multi-dive expeditions could potentially experience cumulative oxygen exposures above the current recommended limits. METHODS: We followed a number of technical recreational diving expeditions using CCRs and recorded the cumulative oxygen exposures of the individual divers. Lung function and visual acuity were recorded at intervals during the expeditions. RESULTS: Over several 8- to 12-day expeditions, divers either approached or exceeded the recommended maximum repetition excursion oxygen exposure (REPEX) limits. Lung function did not show any significant decrement. Changes in visual acuity were reported in several divers but were difficult to quantify. Formal testing of one diver's visual acuity on return home demonstrated a myopic change that resolved over the subsequent eight weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Recreational CCR divers conducting multi-dive expeditions of eight days or more may approach or exceed the REPEX oxygen limits. Despite this, there does not appear to be any significant decrement in lung function. Hyperoxic myopia occurs in some individuals. Changes in acuity appear to resolve spontaneously post exposure. Despite the lack of significant changes in respiratory function, divers should be cautious of such exposures as, should they require recompression therapy for decompression illness, this may result in significant pulmonary oxygen toxicity.

Recreational technical diving part 1: an introduction to technical diving methods and activities.

Technical divers use gases other than air and advanced equipment configurations to conduct dives that are deeper and/or longer than typical recreational air dives. The use of oxygen-nitrogen (nitrox) mixes with oxygen fractions higher than air results in longer no-decompression limits for shallow diving, and faster decompression from deeper dives. For depths beyond the air-diving range, technical divers mix helium, a light non-narcotic gas, with nitrogen and oxygen to produce 'trimix'. These blends are tailored to the depth of intended use with a fraction of oxygen calculated to produce an inspired oxygen partial pressure unlikely to cause cerebral oxygen toxicity and a nitrogen fraction calculated to produce a tolerable degree of nitrogen narcosis. A typical deep technical dive will involve the use of trimix at the target depth with changes to gases containing more oxygen and less inert gas during the decompression. Open-circuit scuba may be used to carry and utilise such gases, but this is very wasteful of expensive helium. There is increasing use of closed-circuit 'rebreather' devices. These recycle expired gas and potentially limit gas consumption to a small amount of inert gas to maintain the volume of the breathing circuit during descent and the amount of oxygen metabolised by the diver. This paper reviews the basic approach to planning and execution of dives using these methods to better inform physicians of the physical demands and risks.

Recreational technical diving part 2: decompression from deep technical dives.

Technical divers perform deep, mixed-gas 'bounce' dives, which are inherently inefficient because even a short duration at the target depth results in lengthy decompression. Technical divers use decompression schedules generated from modified versions of decompression algorithms originally developed for other types of diving. Many modifications ostensibly produce shorter and/or safer decompression, but have generally been driven by anecdote. Scientific evidence relevant to many of these modifications exists, but is often difficult to locate. This review assembles and examines scientific evidence relevant to technical diving decompression practice. There is a widespread belief that bubble algorithms, which redistribute decompression in favour of deeper decompression stops, are more efficient than traditional, shallow-stop, gas-content algorithms, but recent laboratory data support the opposite view. It seems unlikely that switches from helium- to nitrogen-based breathing gases during ascent will accelerate decompression from typical technical bounce dives. However, there is evidence for a higher prevalence of neurological decompression sickness (DCS) after dives conducted breathing only helium-oxygen than those with nitrogen-oxygen. There is also weak evidence suggesting less neurological DCS occurs if helium-oxygen breathing gas is switched to air during decompression than if no switch is made. On the other hand, helium-to-nitrogen breathing gas switches are implicated in the development of inner-ear DCS arising during decompression. Inner-ear DCS is difficult to predict, but strategies to minimize the risk include adequate initial decompression, delaying helium-to-nitrogen switches until relatively shallow, and the use of the maximum safe fraction of inspired oxygen during decompression.

Current status of decompression illness in China: analysis of studies from 2001-2011.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the studies on decompression illness (DCI) in China in the past 10 years. METHODS: We searched three Chinese databases and collected studies on DCI for further analysis. On the basis of findings, we proposed the issues on DCI in China. RESULTS: There are more than 50,000 active divers in China, the majority of whom are fishing divers. Among them, the incidence of DCI is still at a high level because they have little or no knowledge of diving and diving medicine, the quality of diving equipment is poor, and divers generally do not follow the regulations of diving. There are few dive physicians in China, and the general clinicians have poor knowledge about, or pay little attention to, dive medicine. This might be the major cause of the poor quality of studies on DCI. There is no consensus in the classification of DCI and treatment tables for DCI treatment. These are factors affecting systemic review and further meta-analysis of available studies on DCI. CONCLUSION: It is imperative to generalize knowledge in not only divers and diving-related practitioners but general practitioners as well.

The influence of high-fat diets on the occurrence of decompression stress after air dives.

INTRODUCTION: In hyperbaric air exposures, the diver's body is subjected to an increased gas pressure, which simulates a real dive performed in water with the presence of hydrostatic pressure. The hyperbaric effect depends on pressure, its dynamics and exposure time. During compression, physical dissolution of inert gas in body fluids and tissues takes place. The decompression process should result in safe physiological disposal of excess gas from the body. However, despite the correct application of decompression tables we observe cases of decompression sickness. The study aim was to find factors affecting the safety of diving, with a particular emphasis on the diet, which thus far has not been taken into account. METHODS: The study subjects were 56 divers. Before hyperbaric exposure, the following data were collected: age, height and weight; plus each divers filled out a questionnaire about their diet. The data from the questionnaires allowed us to calculate the approximate fat intake with the daily food for each diver. Moreover, blood samples were collected from each diver for analysis of cholesterol and triglycerides. Hyperbaric exposures corresponded to dives conducted to depths of 30 and 60 meters. After exposures each diver was examined via the Doppler method to determine the possible presence of microbubbles in the venous blood. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Decompression stress was observed in 29 subjects. A high-fat diet has a direct impact on increasing levels of cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood serum. A high-fat diet significantly increases the severity of decompression stress in hyperbaric air exposures and creates a threat of pressure disease.

The use of deep tables in the treatment of decompression illness: the Hyperbaric Technicians and Nurses Association 2011 Workshop.

In August 2011, a one-day workshop was convened by the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society and the Hyperbaric Technicians and Nurses Association to examine the use of deep recompression treatment tables for the treatment of decompression illness in Australia and New Zealand. The aim of the workshop was to develop a series of consensus statements to guide practice around the region. The workshop chose to focus the discussion on the use of 405 kPa (30 msw) maximum depth tables using helium-oxygen breathing periods, and covered indications, staffing and technical requirements. This report outlines the evidence basis for these discussions and summarises the series of consensus statements generated. These statements should assist hyperbaric facilities to develop and maintain appropriate policies and procedures for the use of such tables. We anticipate this work will lead to the formulation of a standard schedule for deep recompression to be developed at a future workshop.

Venous gas embolism after an open-water air dive and identical repetitive dive.

Decompression tables indicate that a repetitive dive to the same depth as a first dive should be shortened to obtain the same probability of occurrence of decompression sickness (pDCS). Repetition protocols are based on small numbers, a reason for re-examination. Since venous gas embolism (VGE) and pDCS are related, one would expect a higher bubble grade (BG) of VGE after the repetitive dive without reducing bottom time. BGs were determined in 28 divers after a first and an identical repetitive air dive of 40 minutes to 20 meters of sea water. Doppler BG scores were transformed to log number of bubbles/cm2 (logB) to allow numerical analysis. With a previously published model (Model2), pDCS was calculated for the first dive and for both dives together. From pDCS, theoretical logBs were estimated with a pDCS-to-logB model constructed from literature data. However, pDCS the second dive was provided using conditional probability. This was achieved in Model2 and indirectly via tissue saturations. The combination of both models shows a significant increase of logB after the second dive, whereas the measurements showed an unexpected lower logB. These differences between measurements and model expectations are significant (p-values < 0.01). A reason for this discrepancy is uncertain. The most likely speculation would be that the divers, who were relatively old, did not perform physical activity for some days before the first dive. Our data suggest that, wisely, the first dive after a period of no exercise should be performed conservatively, particularly for older divers.

Observation of increased venous gas emboli after wet dives compared to dry dives.

INTRODUCTION: Testing of decompression procedures has been performed both in the dry and during immersion, assuming that the results can be directly compared. To test this, the aim of the present paper was to compare the number of venous gas bubbles observed following a short, deep and a shallow, long air dive performed dry in a hyperbaric chamber and following actual dives in open water. METHODS: Fourteen experienced male divers participated in the study; seven performed dry and wet dives to 24 metres' sea water (msw) for 70 minutes; seven divers performed dry and wet dives to 54 msw for 20 minutes. Decompression followed a Bühlmann decompression procedure. Immediately following the dive, pulmonary artery bubble formation was monitored for two hours. The results were graded according to the method of Eftedal and Brubakk. RESULTS: All divers completed the dive protocol, none of them showed any signs of decompression sickness. During the observation period, following the shallow dives, the bubbles increased from 0.1 bubbles per cm ² after the dry dive to 1.4 bubbles per cm ² after the wet dive. Following the deep dives, the bubbles increased from 0.1 bubbles per cm ² in the dry dive to 2.4 bubbles per cm ² in the wet dive. Both results are highly significant (P = 0.0001 or less). CONCLUSIONS: The study has shown that diving in water produces significantly more gas bubble formation than dry diving. The number of venous gas bubbles observed after decompression in water according to a rather conservative procedure, indicates that accepted standard decompression procedures nevertheless induce considerable decompression stress. We suggest that decompression procedures should aim at keeping venous bubble formation as low as possible.

Investigation of a demand-controlled rebreather in connection with a diving accident.

This paper describes the examination of a Halcyon RB80 semi-closed underwater breathing apparatus used in a diving accident in 2007. The apparatus was supplied with trimix (oxygen, nitrogen and helium) containing 31% oxygen. The duration of the dive was 105 minutes at 28 meters' average depth in fresh water, with a 19-minute oxygen decompression stop at 6 meters. Upon surfacing the diver experienced seizures and signs of severe neurological deficits. The apparatus was tested with regard to the oxygen fraction drop from the supply gas to the breathing loop--i.e., the oxygen fraction inhaled by the diver (FiO2) was investigated. The FiO2 was measured and found to be lower than the value stated on the manufacturer's web page at the time of the accident. This investigation suggests that during the dive, the actual FiO2% was 17.9-25.3%, which is considerably lower than the FiO2% used for decompression calculations (30%). The underestimation of FiO2 resulted in too short and/or too few decompression stops during ascent. The low FiO2 would also put a diver at risk of hypoxia at shallow depths. It is concluded that inadequate information on the performance of the rebreather was a major contributing factor to this accident.