Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 244: 116128, 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598924

ABSTRACT

Genotoxic impurities (GTIs) are potential carcinogens that need to be controlled down to ppm or lower concentration levels in pharmaceuticals under strict regulations. The static headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) coupled with electron capture detection (ECD) is an effective approach to monitor halogenated and nitroaromatic genotoxins. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) possess tunable physico-chemical properties and low vapor pressure for HS-GC methods. In this study, zwitterionic and non-ionic DESs have been used for the first time to develop and validate a sensitive analytical method for the analysis of 24 genotoxins at sub-ppm concentrations. Compared to non-ionic diluents, zwitterionic DESs produced exceptional analytical performance and the betaine : 7 (1,4- butane diol) DES outperformed the betaine : 5 (1,4-butane diol) DES. Limits of detection (LOD) down to the 5-ppb concentration level were achieved in DESs. Wide linear ranges spanning over 5 orders of magnitude (0.005-100 µg g-1) were obtained for most analytes with exceptional sensitivities and high precision. The method accuracy and precision were validated using 3 commercially available drug substances and excellent recoveries were obtained. This study broadens the applicability of HS-GC in the determination of less volatile GTIs by establishing DESs as viable diluent substitutes for organic solvents in routine pharmaceutical analysis.


Subject(s)
Deep Eutectic Solvents , Drug Contamination , Limit of Detection , Mutagens , Drug Contamination/prevention & control , Chromatography, Gas/methods , Mutagens/analysis , Pharmaceutical Preparations/analysis , Pharmaceutical Preparations/chemistry , Deep Eutectic Solvents/chemistry , Deep Eutectic Solvents/analysis , Green Chemistry Technology/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Solvents/chemistry
2.
J Sep Sci ; 44(22): 4167-4180, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34558180

ABSTRACT

In the present work, a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction approach has been developed for extraction of four phytosterols (stigmasterol, ß-sitosterol, campesterol, and brassicasterol) from cow milk samples using organic and deep eutectic solvents and the results were critically compared. The extracted analytes were determined using high performance liquid chromatography. In the developed method, carbon tetrachloride and choline chloride:p-chlorophenol deep eutectic solvent were selected to use as the best extraction solvent. Effective parameters and validation data were studied for both methods, independently. Under optimum conditions, limits of detection and quantification were within the ranges of 0.3-0.9 and 1.0-3.0 ng/mL for organic solvent based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and 0.09-0.32 and 0.3-1.0 ng/mL for deep eutectic solvent based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, respectively. Good coefficient of determinations and relative standard deviations obtained for the methods were ≥0.994 and ≤7.6%, respectively. The introduced method was performed on different milk samples for the determination of target analytes using both solvents and the results were analyzed statistically by the t-test.


Subject(s)
Milk/chemistry , Phytosterols/analysis , Animals , Cholestadienols/analysis , Cholesterol/analogs & derivatives , Cholesterol/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Deep Eutectic Solvents/analysis , Food Contamination/analysis , Limit of Detection , Liquid Phase Microextraction/methods , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Solvents/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...