Contradictory Resuscitation Procedure for Cardiopulmonary Arrest.

Drawing from a comprehensive Japan-based literature review and the author's personal experience, this article presents findings that highlight potential improvements in clinical outcomes, such as reduced mortality rates, by optimizing the current resuscitation procedure for cardiopulmonary arrest. Many countries have adopted similar procedures for cardiopulmonary arrest. This article presents a prioritized resuscitation method based on scientific evidence, aiming to improve survival rates. The study, which was conducted in Japan, revealed inconsistencies in the current resuscitation procedure for cardiopulmonary arrest. The study did not involve direct participants but relied on literature review for data collection. A literature review was conducted to analyze the survival rates of various resuscitation methods. The interventions reviewed in the literature included cardiopulmonary resuscitation, automated external defibrillator, and automatic mechanical chest compressions. The survival rate of cardiopulmonary arrest in Japan was found to be low. The results of the literature review suggest that cardiopulmonary resuscitation or automatic mechanical chest compressions should be applied before using an automated external defibrillator. The study emphasizes the need to prioritize resuscitation methods with higher survival rates. This article presents a prioritized resuscitation method based on scientific evidence, aiming to improve survival rates. It is hoped that this new approach will lead to a significant improvement in the survival rates of cardiopulmonary arrest patients.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in Japan.

This study investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes in Japan, aiming to address a critical research gap. Analyzing data from the All-Japan Utstein registry covering pediatric OHCA cases from 2018 to 2021, the study observed no significant changes in one-month survival, neurological outcomes, or overall performance when comparing the pre-pandemic (2018-2019) and pandemic (2020-2021) periods among 6765 cases. However, a notable reduction in pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during the pandemic (15.1-13.1%, p = .020) was identified. Bystander-initiated chest compressions and rescue breaths declined (71.1-65.8%, 22.3-13.0%, respectively; both p < .001), while bystander-initiated automated external defibrillator (AED) use increased (3.7-4.9%, p = .029). Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with reduced pre-hospital ROSC during the pandemic. Post-pandemic, there was no noticeable change in the one-month survival rate. The lack of significant change in survival may be attributed to the negative effects of reduced chest compressions and ventilation being offset by the positive impact of widespread AED availability in Japan. These findings underscore the importance of innovative tools and systems for safe bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation during a pandemic, providing insights to optimize pediatric OHCA care.

A review regarding the article 'Health inequalities in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of automated electrical defibrillators in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest'.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major cause of mortality worldwide, with a high incidence and low survival rate. Prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use are major contributors in the "chain of survival" for OHCA. the response of a community plays a key role in determining the outcomes in OHCA. The outcomes of OHCA are affected by health inequalities in bystander CPR and AED use, due to factors such as differences in sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status amongst others. Literature shows patients from lower socio-economic backgrounds are more likely to have risk factors for a cardiac arrest and are therefore more likely to have OHCA. Studies have also reported lower rates of bystander AED use in females compared to males. Targeting deprived areas with tailored training and access to AEDs can be beneficial in improving CPR outcomes in communities. Due to the physical nature of CPR maneuvers, age and frailty of the patient can both impact the outcome of the resuscitation. Environmental factors affecting AED use include availability, visibility, accessibility, support, extra equipment, training materials, staffing, and awareness. Education should focus on areas such as conducting BLS on both male and female patients, recognizing cardiac arrest, tailoring BLS to difference ages as well as provision for training in different languages, including sign language. Like some other countries, CPR training is now being implemented in the school curriculum.

Message From an Automated External Defibrillator.

This case report describes a man in his 80s who received shock from an automated external defibrillator that registered 3 types of tachycardia.

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation differences by sex - The role of arrest recognition.

PURPOSE: To assess whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) differed by patient sex among bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of paramedic-attended OHCA in New South Wales (NSW) between January 2017 to December 2019 (restricted to bystander-witnessed cases). Exclusions included OHCA in aged care, medical facilities, with advance care directives, from non-medical causes. Multivariate logistic regression examined the association of patient sex with bystander CPR. Secondary outcomes were OHCA recognition, bystander AED application, initial shockable rhythm, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Of 4,491cases, females were less likely to receive bystander CPR in private residential (Adjusted Odds ratio [AOR]: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.70-0.95) and public locations (AOR: 0.58, 95%CI:0.39-0.88). OHCA recognition during the emergency call was lower for females arresting in public locations (84.6% vs 91.6%, p = 0.002) and this partially explained the association of sex with bystander CPR (∼44%). This difference in recognition was not observed in private residential locations (p = 0.2). Bystander AED use was lower for females (4.8% vs 9.6%, p < 0.001); however, after adjustment for location and other covariates, this relationship was no longer significant (AOR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.60-1.12). Females were less likely to be in an initial shockable rhythm (AOR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.44-0.61), but more likely to survive the event (AOR: 1.34, 95%CI: 1.15-1.56). There was no sex difference in survival to hospital discharge (AOR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.77-1.19). CONCLUSION: OHCA recognition and bystander CPR differ by patient sex in NSW. Research is needed to understand why this difference occurs and to raise public awareness of this issue.

Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Before and After Legislation for Bystander CPR.

Importance: The lack of evidence-based implementation strategies is a major contributor to increasing mortality due to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in developing countries with limited resources. Objective: To evaluate whether the implementation of legislation is associated with increased bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use and improved clinical outcomes for patients experiencing OHCA and to provide policy implications for low-income and middle-income settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study analyzed a prospective city registry of patients with bystander-witnessed OHCA between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022. The Emergency Medical Aid Act was implemented in Shenzhen, China, on October 1, 2018. An interrupted time-series analysis was used to assess changes in outcomes before and after the law. Data analysis was performed from May to October 2023. Exposure: The Emergency Medical Aid Act stipulated the use of AEDs and CPR training for the public and provided clear legal guidance for OHCA rescuing. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were rates of bystander-initiated CPR and use of AEDs. Secondary outcomes were rates of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to arrival at the hospital, and survival at discharge. Results: A total of 13 751 patients with OHCA (median [IQR] age, 59 [43-76] years; 10 011 men [72.83%]) were included, with 7858 OHCAs occurring during the prelegislation period (January 1, 2010, to September 30, 2018) and 5893 OHCAs occurring during the postlegislation period (October 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022). The rates of bystander-initiated CPR (320 patients [4.10%] vs 1103 patients [18.73%]) and AED use (214 patients [4.12%] vs 182 patients [5.29%]) increased significantly after legislation implementation vs rates before the legislation. Rates of prehospital ROSC (72 patients [0.92%] vs 425 patients [7.21%]), survival to arrival at the hospital (68 patients [0.87%] vs 321 patients [5.45%]), and survival at discharge (44 patients [0.56%] vs 165 patients [2.80%]) were significantly increased during the postlegislation period. Interrupted time-series models demonstrated a significant slope change in the rates of all outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that implementation of the Emergency Medical Aid Act in China was associated with increased rates of CPR and public AED use and improved survival of patients with OHCA. The use of a systemwide approach to enact resuscitation initiatives and provide legal support may reduce the burden of OHCA in low-income and middle-income settings.

Enhancing the accuracy of shock advisory algorithms in automated external defibrillators during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a cascade of CNNEDs.

Delivery of continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plays an important role in the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival rate. However, to prevent CPR artifacts being superimposed on ECG morphology data, currently available automated external defibrillators (AEDs) require pauses in CPR for accurate analysis heart rhythms. In this study, we propose a novel Convolutional Neural Network-based Encoder-Decoder (CNNED) structure with a shock advisory algorithm to improve the accuracy and reliability of shock versus non-shock decision-making without CPR pause in OHCA scenarios. Our approach employs a cascade of CNNEDs in conjunction with an AED shock advisory algorithm to process the ECG data for shock decisions. Initially, a CNNED trained on an equal number of shockable and non-shockable rhythms is used to filter the CPR-contaminated data. The resulting filtered signal is then fed into a second CNNED, which is trained on imbalanced data more tilted toward the specific rhythm being analyzed. A reliable shock versus non-shock decision is made when both classifiers from the cascade structure agree, while segments with conflicting classifications are labeled as indeterminate, indicating the need for additional segments to analyze. To evaluate our approach, we generated CPR-contaminated ECG data by combining clean ECG data with 52 CPR samples. We used clean ECG data from the CUDB, AFDB, SDDB, and VFDB databases, to which 52 CPR artifact cases were added, while a separate test set provided by the AED manufacturer Defibtech LLC was used for performance evaluation. The test set comprised 20,384 non-shockable CPR-contaminated segments from 392 subjects, as well as 3744 shockable CPR-contaminated samples from 41 subjects with coarse ventricular fibrillation (VF) and 31 subjects with rapid ventricular tachycardia (rapid VT). We observed improvements in rhythm analysis using our proposed cascading CNNED structure when compared to using a single CNNED structure. Specifically, the specificity of the proposed cascade of CNNED structure increased from 99.14% to 99.35% for normal sinus rhythm and from 96.45% to 97.22% for other non-shockable rhythms. Moreover, the sensitivity for shockable rhythm detection increased from 90.90% to 95.41% for ventricular fibrillation and from 82.26% to 87.66% for rapid ventricular tachycardia. These results meet the performance thresholds set by the American Heart Association and demonstrate the reliable and accurate analysis of heart rhythms during CPR using only ECG data without the need for CPR interruptions or a reference signal.

The diagnostic accuracy of a shock advisory algorithm in automated external defibrillators in the presence of real-world artifacts.

BACKGROUND: The current standards for shock advisory algorithms in AEDs require performance testing on artifact-free ECGs. However, AED analysis in the real world is more challenging due to potential artifacts from various sources (e.g., patient handling, and electromagnetic interference). This retrospective data analysis reports the real-world performance and behavior of a shock advisory algorithm used in three AED models with the presence of artifacts. METHODS: ECG rhythm analyses recorded during the use of three AED models (HS1, FRx and FR3) were reviewed. The shock recommendations made in the AEDs were compared to the expert annotations of reviewers. The effects of real-world artifacts and the handling by the algorithm were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 3,941 analyses, 619 were annotated as shockable rhythms, and 2,912 were non-shockable. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 97.1% (601/619), and 99.9% (2,908/2,912), respectively. Artifacts were detected by the algorithm in 23.3% (918/3,941) of the analysis periods. The algorithm performance for the analysis periods with artifacts detected was 95.2% (80/84) for sensitivity and 100.0% (687/687) for specificity. In the remaining analysis periods with no artifacts detected, the sensitivity was 97.4% (521/535), and specificity was 99.8% (2,221/2,225). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of this shock advisory algorithm during real-world resuscitations with or without artifacts, exceeded AHA recommendations and the requirements in international standards. The high sensitivity and specificity demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of this algorithm in all three AED models.

Comment on the. Health inequalities in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

I am writing to express my concerns regarding article on Health inequalities in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)1. The article provides a comprehensive overview of the issue, but several points could be expanded upon or clarified.

Incorporation of Drone Technology Into the Chain of Survival for OHCA: Estimation of Time Needed for Bystander Treatment of OHCA and CPR Performance.

BACKGROUND: Drone-delivered automated external defibrillators (AEDs) hold promises in the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Our objective was to estimate the time needed to perform resuscitation with a drone-delivered AED and to measure cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. METHODS: Mock out-of-hospital cardiac arrest simulations that included a 9-1-1 call, CPR, and drone-delivered AED were conducted. Each simulation was timed and video-recorded. CPR performance metrics were recorded by a Laerdal Resusci Anne Quality Feedback System. Multivariable regression modeling examined factors associated with time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock and CPR quality metrics (compression rate, depth, recoil, and chest compression fraction). Comparisons were made among those with recent CPR training (≤2 years) versus no recent (>2 years) or prior CPR training. RESULTS: We recruited 51 research participants between September 2019 and March 2020. The median age was 34 (Q1-Q3, 23-54) years, 56.9% were female, and 41.2% had recent CPR training. The median time from 9-1-1 call to initiation of CPR was 1:19 (Q1-Q3, 1:06-1:26) minutes. A median time of 1:59 (Q1-Q3, 01:50-02:20) minutes was needed to retrieve a drone-delivered AED and deliver a shock. The median CPR compression rate was 115 (Q1-Q3, 109-124) beats per minute, the correct compression depth percentage was 92% (Q1-Q3, 25-98), and the chest compression fraction was 46.7% (Q1-Q3, 39.9%-50.6%). Recent CPR training was not associated with CPR quality or time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock. Younger age (per 10-year increase; ß, 9.97 [95% CI, 4.63-15.31] s; P<0.001) and prior experience with AED (ß, -30.0 [95% CI, -50.1 to -10.0] s; P=0.004) were associated with more rapid time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock. Prior AED use (ß, 6.71 [95% CI, 1.62-11.79]; P=0.011) was associated with improved chest compression fraction percentage. CONCLUSION: Research participants were able to rapidly retrieve an AED from a drone while largely maintaining CPR quality according to American Heart Association guidelines. Chest compression fraction was lower than expected.

[Whether to implant a defibrillator or not? The Possibility of Using the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score Calculator in Real Practice].

AIM: To study the predictive capabilities of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score calculator in assessing the benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 388 patients with NYHA II-IV functional class chronic heart failure (CHF) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35 % who underwent ICD placement for the primary prevention of SCD. Patients were followed up for two years to record the endpoints of first-time paroxysmal sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) or non-arrhythmic death. RESULTS: According to the results of calculation with the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score calculator, 276 (71 %) patients had a high risk of VT (score ≥7) and 150 (39 %) had a high risk of non-arrhythmic death (score ≥3). 336 (94%) patients would benefit from an ICD: 148 (38 %) with a high level of probability and 218 (56 %) with a medium level of probability. According to the incidence of endpoints, VT episodes predominated in the low-ICD benefit group (36%), while the high-ICD benefit group had a relatively high incidence of non-arrhythmic death (12%). CONCLUSION: The results obtained for a cohort of Russian patients with CHF and reduced LVEF indicated that the use of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score in routine clinical practice does not improve the stratification of SCD risk compared to the traditional approach to selecting patients with CHF for ICD based on the LVEF value.