Risdiplam improves subjective swallowing quality in non-ambulatory adult patients with 5q-spinal muscular atrophy despite advanced motor impairment.

BACKGROUND: 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is characterized by the progressive loss of motor neurons with consecutive weakness and atrophy of the limb, respiratory, and bulbar muscles. While trunk and limb motor function improve or stabilize in adults with SMA under nusinersen and risdiplam treatment, the efficacy on bulbar function in this age group of patients remains uncertain. However, it is important to assess bulbar dysfunction, which frequently occurs in the disease course and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Bulbar function was evaluated prospectively in 25 non-ambulatory adults with type 2 and 3 SMA before and 4 and 12 months after risdiplam treatment initiation using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) and the bulbar subscore of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (b-ALSFRS-R). Extremity function was assessed using the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) and Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM). RESULTS: Subjective swallowing quality, measured with the SSQ, improved after 12 months of therapy with risdiplam. For the b-ALSFRS-R, a non-significant trend towards improvement was observed. The RULM score improved after 12 months of risdiplam therapy, but not the HFMSE score. HFMSE and RULM scores did not correlate with the SSQ but the b-ALSFRS-R score at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in subjective swallowing quality under risdiplam treatment, despite an advanced disease stage with severe motor deficits, strengthens the importance of a standardized bulbar assessment in addition to established motor scores. This may reveal relevant treatment effects and help individualize treatment decisions in the future.

Use of botox for sialorrhea and dysphagia in the neonatal population.

INTRODUCTION: Botox is frequently used for sialorrhea in patients with compromised airways and those with etiologies causing difficulty with secretion management (i.e. strokes, neurologic disorders, etc.). There are no published studies regarding the use of botulinum toxin (BoNT) in the neonate population. We aim to discuss our experience and safety of BoNT use in the neonate population in regards to alleviating secretion management and airway protection. METHODS: Retrospective review of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) ≤12 months of age who received BoNT injection to submandibular (SMG) and parotid (PG) glands for sialorrhea/dysphagia. BoNT was administered under ultrasound (u/s) guidance by interventional radiology. RESULTS: 6 children were examined. 2 (33 %) were male. Avg NICU stay was 87.5 ± 33.1 days. 2 underwent surgical airway intervention prior to injection. Mean age at initial BoNT was 1.5 ± 0.7 months. Avg weight at injection was 4 ± 1.1 kg. Each PG and SMG were injected in 5/6 cases. Bilateral SMG were unidentified on u/s in 1 case and thus not injected. Dose range injected per gland was 5-15u. 100 % required tube feeds, 50 % with tubes distal to stomach (NJT/NDT). 83 % were completely NPO prior to injection and there was no noted clinical improvement in oral skills post injection. All had noted desats/apneas prior to injection and 83 % had reported decreased events post injection. 50 % had reported decrease O2 requirements and frequent suctioning 2wks after injection, however 2 (33 %) required surgical airway intervention after injection (trach, SGP/MDO). 4/6 (67 %) trialed medical therapy, anticholinergics being the most common. 50 % underwent 2nd injection (age = 6.5 ± 0.3 months) avg. 4.7 ± 0.7mo after 1st injection, and the same 3pts underwent 3rd injection (age = 12.5 ± 2.4 months) avg. 6.1 ± 2.5mo after 2nd injection. 1 pt. had a total 6 injections. There were no injection related complications. CONCLUSION: BoNT injection is a safe, non-invasive alterative for management of sialorrhea in neonates. Further extensive study needs to be performed to identify the optimal dose per gland in this population.

Safety and Effectiveness of Prucalopride in Children with Functional Constipation with and without Upper Symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric prucalopride studies for treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) disorders have reported mixed results. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of prucalopride in functional constipation (FC) with and without upper GI symptoms. METHODS: Retrospective data on patients with FC receiving combined prucalopride and conventional therapy was compared with those receiving conventional therapy alone within 12 months. Thirty patients on combined therapy and those on conventional therapy were each matched on the basis of age, gender, race, and presence of fecal soiling. Response (complete, partial, or no resolution) was compared. Similarly, response to concurrent functional upper GI symptoms (postprandial pain, bloating, weight loss, vomiting, early satiety, or nausea) and dysphagia, as well as adverse effects, were evaluated in the combined group. RESULTS: Mean age of 57 cases was 14.7 ± 4.9 years and 68% were female. Comorbidities included functional upper GI (UGI) symptoms (84%), dysphagia (12%), mood disorders (49%), and hypermobility spectrum disorder (37%). Unmatched cases reported 63% improvement to FC; response did not differ between the matched cohorts (70% versus 76.6%, p = 0.84). Cases showed a 56% improvement in functional UGI symptoms and 100% in dysphagia. Adverse effects were reported in 30%, abdominal cramps being most common. Four (7%) patients with a known mood disorder reported worsened mood, of which two endorsed suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: Prucalopride efficaciously treated concurrent UGI symptoms and dysphagia in constipated pediatric patients and was overall well tolerated. Preexisting mood disorders seemed to worsen in a small subset of cases.

Modified medication use in dysphagia: the effect of thickener on drug bioavailability-a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is associated with long-term conditions including strokes, dementia, Parkinson's disease and frailty. Dysphagia affects 30-40% of the population aged over 65 years-old. Adults with dysphagia often experience long-term conditions requiring multiple medications (often > 5) to manage these. The thickening of liquids is a common compensatory strategy in dysphagia management. Studies suggest that immersion in thickened liquids affects medicines' solubility in vitro. Clinicians and pharmacists are unaware of the pharmacokinetic/therapeutic effects of thickened liquids on oral medicines. We conducted a systematic review of existing literature on thickeners' effects on drug bioavailability. METHODOLOGY: We performed a literature search of MEDLINE & EMBASE. Search terms included: dysphagia/thickened diet (EMBASE only)/ bioavailability or absorption of medicines or pharmacokinetics; excluded: NG feeds/animal studies. STUDIES INCLUDED: all genders, countries, > 18 years, community and hospital settings. PRISMA guidance was followed. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy results were found, and 23 articles identified following the reference list review. Following an abstract and full-text review, 18 were included. Most articles evaluated thickeners on dissolution profiles in-vitro, with a few investigating in-vivo. Most studies were single-centre prospective studies identifying that thickeners generally affect dissolution rates of medications. Few studies assessed bioavailability or used clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Dysphagia and polypharmacy are common in older adults, but little is known about the effects of altering liquid viscosity on the therapeutic effect of most medications. Further larger-scale studies are required to evaluate the therapeutic impact of thickener, on a bigger range of medications, factoring in other variables such as type of thickener, viscosity of thickener and duration of immersion.

Diagnosis and evaluation of elderly-onset myasthenia gravis: A case report.

RATIONALE: Patients with elderly-onset myasthenia gravis can have a good prognosis with appropriate diagnosis and response, although it is difficult to differentiate between exacerbations of myasthenia gravis in elderly patients and age-related changes. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand the clinical characteristics and safe assessment methods for patients with elderly-onset myasthenia gravis. PATIENT CONCERNS: An 82-year-old male diagnosed with myasthenia gravis 6 months prior had no difficulty in daily living. After falling on a golf course, he was diagnosed with a right femoral neck fracture on the 1st day and underwent right total hip replacement surgery on the 12th day, being transferred to our hospital for rehabilitation therapy on the 32nd day. However, immediately after transfer, the patient showed fatigability during training and difficulty swallowing food. DIAGNOSES: This case was diagnosed as an exacerbation of myasthenia gravis. INTERVENTIONS: Pyridostigmine was initiated with the expectation of immediate effect on the 54th day. OUTCOMES: His symptoms and physical functions improved immediately, and walking distance and food intake increased. From this clinical course, it was judged that immunosuppressive therapy was indicated as a transition to generalized myasthenia gravis. For this reason, he was discharged after arranging postdischarge visits to the department of neurology, accordingly. LESSONS: A better understanding of the characteristics of elderly-onset myasthenia gravis may allow for relatively safe assessment of the condition and improve its diagnosis and treatment.

Dupilumab demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated regardless of prior use of swallowed topical corticosteroids in adolescent and adult patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 LIBERTY EoE TREET study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of long-term dupilumab on histological, symptomatic and endoscopic aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) in adolescent and adult patients with and without prior use of swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) or prior inadequate response, intolerance or contraindication to STC. DESIGN: Pre-specified analysis of data from the phase 3 LIBERTY EoE TREET study on patients who received dupilumab 300 mg once a week or placebo for 24 weeks (W24) in parts A and B, and an additional 28 weeks (W52) in part C. Patients were categorised as with/without prior STC use and with/without inadequate/intolerance/contraindication to STC. The proportion of patients achieving ≤6 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf), absolute change in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) score, mean change in Endoscopic Reference Score and Histologic Scoring System grade/stage scores were assessed for each subgroup. RESULTS: Regardless of prior STC use, dupilumab increased the proportion of patients achieving ≤6 eos/hpf and improved DSQ score versus placebo at W24, with improvements maintained or improved at W52. The DSQ score and the proportion of patients achieving ≤6 eos/hpf after switching from placebo to dupilumab at W24 were similar to those observed in the dupilumab group at W24, regardless of prior STC use or inadequate/intolerance/contraindication to STC. Improvements in other outcomes with dupilumab were similar in patients with/without prior STC use or inadequate/intolerance/contraindication to STC. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab 300 mg once a week demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated in patients with EoE regardless of prior STC use or inadequate response, intolerance and/or contraindication to STC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03633617.

Deglufarm: aplicación móvil con recomendaciones para la administración segura de medicamentos en pacientes con disfagia o problemas de deglución / Deglufarm: Mobile application with recommendations for safety drug administration in patients with dysphagia or deglution disorders

Objetivo desarrollar una app para su uso en la práctica asistencial, con información actualizada y veraz sobre la manipulación de medicamentos en los pacientes con disfagia y otros problemas de deglución, así como su compatibilidad con alimentos y espesantes. Método el desarrollo de la app Deglufarm® se hizo con un proyecto de los grupos de trabajo CRONOS, Nutrición y Tecno de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria. Se constituyó un grupo de farmacéuticos especialistas, de diferentes ámbitos de la atención al paciente con disfagia. La creación de Deglufarm® constó de varias etapas: selección de principios activos, revisión bibliográfica, elaboración de contenidos, diseño (se contactó con una empresa experta en diseño de apps), testing, lanzamiento, actualización de contenidos y seguimiento. Resultados Deglufarm® está disponible para Android e IOS gratuitamente desde julio de 2022. Ha sido testada entre los miembros del grupo investigador y colaboradores. En la actualidad se han revisado y registrado en Deglufarm® 540 monografías de principios activos. La primera versión está dirigida a profesionales sanitarios. Conclusiones Deglufarm® es una herramienta fácil y sencilla de consultar, con la evidencia más actual sobre la manipulación de los medicamentos que contiene. (AU)

Objective Develop an App to use in healthcare practice, with updated and accurate information on the handling of medications in patients with dysphagia or deglution disorders, as well as their compatibility with food and thickeners. Methods The development of the Deglufarm® App was based on the CRONOS, Nutrition and Techno working groups of the Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria. A group of specialist pharmacists was created from different care areas for patients with dysphagia. The creation of Deglufarm® consisted of several stages: Selection of active drugs, literature review, content development, design (an expert company in App design was contacted), testing, launch, content update and follow-up. Results Deglufarm® is available for Android and IOS free of charge from July 2022. It has been tested among the members of the research group and collaborators, currently, 540 monographs of active drugs have been reviewed and registered in Deglufarm. The first version is aimed at healthcare professionals. Conclusions Deglufarm® is an easy tool to consult, with the most current evidence on handling the medicines it contains. (AU)

Implementing a medication lubricant for pill dysphagia on an acute care ward using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.

BACKGROUND: Pill dysphagia, the difficulty in swallowing solid oral medications, is a common problem that can affect medication adherence and increase pill modifications. Current practices of crushing medications or using food vehicles have limitations and potential risks. This report describes the implementation of a medication lubricant, Gloup, for pill dysphagia on an acute care ward using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this project was to evaluate the implementation of Gloup in the acute care ward setting and assess its acceptability and uptake by patients and ward nurses during medication administration. METHODS: The project involved chart audits of medication administration records, collection of patient feedback, and staff feedback through meetings. Patient characteristics and medication administration practices were documented. The implementation process included education and training sessions for staff, development of a medication chart sticker for evaluation data collection and small-scale testing of Gloup with patients before ward-level implementation. RESULTS: The implementation of Gloup on the acute care ward showed high uptake and acceptability. The majority of patients using Gloup had crushed medications, and the use of Gloup varied based on patient needs. CONCLUSION: The implementation of Gloup as a medication lubricant for pill dysphagia on an acute care ward was successful and well received by patients and staff. The use of Gloup appeared to improve medication administration practices and reduce the need for crushing medications or using food vehicles. This project highlights the importance of addressing pill dysphagia in acute care settings and provides insights for other wards considering similar interventions.

Development of an Administration Guideline of Oral Medicines to Patients with Dysphagia.

Background and Objectives: There is increasing evidence that patients with dysphagia often have limited access to suitable oral dosage forms, especially when administered via an enteral feeding tube (FT). In addition, there is a lack of clear and readily available information from drug manufacturers on how to administer medications to patients with dysphagia. This study aimed to develop a practical guide for healthcare professionals to increase the safe and effective administration of oral medications to patients with dysphagia. Materials and Methods: The data were collected from existing English databases and handbooks available to develop an easy-to-use tabular guideline presenting all relevant information using keywords and short expressions. The working group differentiated 514 formulation types, and the information was collected and added to the guideline separately. In addition, the instructions for the patients taking the medicines orally or via FT were described separately. Results: The guideline consisted of 24 keywords or short expressions developed by the working group and described the instructions to use them. The guideline contained 343 active pharmaceutical ingredients and 19 fixed-dose combinations. Conclusions: Knowledge about proper medication preparation and administration for patients with swallowing difficulties is limited but essential. It is crucial to encourage drug manufacturers to provide this information as a standard to ensure the safe and effective use of medications for all patient groups.

Crushed Tablet Administration for Patients with Dysphagia and Enteral Feeding: Challenges and Considerations.

Dysphagia is increasingly common in older adults; it is especially prevalent in long-term care settings. Patients with dysphagia likely require pharmacologic treatment for multiple comorbidities but may find it difficult or impossible to swallow oral medications. Administering crushed medications mixed with a soft food or liquid vehicle, or via a feeding tube, is a common strategy to circumvent swallowing difficulties in patients with dysphagia. However, inappropriate medication use and improper crushing technique can reduce the medication dose a patient receives, alter medication pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and compromise treatment efficacy and patient safety. Clinical judgment is needed to identify medications that can and cannot be crushed, select a crushing methodology and vehicle for administering crushed medications, and create a strategy for administering multiple medications. A coordinated effort from the entire care team-including physicians, pharmacists, nurses, advanced practice providers, speech therapists, patients, and caregivers-is necessary to develop and implement an individualized plan for administering medications to patients with dysphagia. This review details the current literature regarding the administration of medications that have been altered, such as by crushing tablets or opening capsules, for patients with dysphagia or who are receiving enteral feeding and provides recommendations on best practices.

Dysphagia, or difficulty swallowing, is common in hospitals and in places that provide long-term care. People who live at home may also have a hard time swallowing pills. In this review, we talk about how people who have a hard time swallowing pills can best take their medicines. A speech-language pathologist can help people with dysphagia find ways to eat and drink safely. Their healthcare provider and pharmacist should make sure all their medicines are needed and check if any of their medicines come in a form that does not need to be swallowed, like a patch. It is sometimes okay to take a medicine by crushing a pill and then mixing with food. However, some medicines may be dangerous or less effective if they are crushed or mixed with some foods. Mixing multiple crushed medicines may also be unsafe or make them less effective. People in hospitals and long-term care settings who have a hard time swallowing pills should have an individual plan in place for taking medicines. Physicians, pharmacists, speech-language pathologists, and front-line care staff should work with patients and caregivers to make the plan. The plan should be written down in their patient record. People who have a hard time swallowing medicines should talk to their doctor or pharmacist about how best to take their medicines. People should not alter their medicines without talking to a healthcare professional.

Pooled Phase 2 and 3 Efficacy and Safety Data on Budesonide Oral Suspension in Adolescents with Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) in adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). METHODS: This post hoc analysis pooled data from two 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of BOS 2.0 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) (phase 2, NCT01642212; phase 3, NCT02605837) in patients aged 11-17 years with EoE and dysphagia. Efficacy endpoints included histologic (≤6, ≤1, and <15 eosinophils per high-power field [eos/hpf]), dysphagia symptom (≥30% reduction in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire [DSQ] scores from baseline), and clinicopathologic (≤6 eos/hpf and ≥30% reduction in DSQ scores from baseline) responses at week 12. Change from baseline to week 12 in peak eosinophil counts, DSQ scores, EoE Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS) grade (severity) and stage (extent) total score ratios (TSRs), and total EoE Endoscopic Reference Scores (EREFS) were assessed. Safety outcomes were also examined. RESULTS: Overall, 76 adolescents were included (BOS, n = 45; placebo, n = 31). Significantly more patients who received BOS than placebo achieved histologic responses (≤6 eos/hpf: 46.7% vs 6.5%; ≤1 eos/hpf: 42.2% vs 0.0%; <15 eos/hpf: 53.3% vs 9.7%; P < 0.001) and a clinicopathologic response (31.1% vs 3.2%; P = 0.003) at week 12. More BOS-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved a dysphagia symptom response at week 12 (68.9% vs 58.1%; not statistically significant P = 0.314). BOS-treated patients had significantly greater reductions in EoEHSS grade and stage TSRs ( P < 0.001) and total EREFS ( P = 0.021) from baseline to week 12 than placebo-treated patients. BOS was well tolerated, with no clinically meaningful differences in adverse events versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d. significantly improved most efficacy outcomes in adolescents with EoE versus placebo.

[Translated article] Deglufarm: Mobile application with recommendations for the safe administration of drugs in patients with dysphagia or swallowing disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Develop an App to use in healthcare practice, with updated and accurate information on the handling of medications in patients with dysphagia or deglution disorders, as well as their compatibility with food and thickeners. METHODS: The development of the Deglufarm® App was based on the CRONOS, Nutrition and Techno working groups of the Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria. A group of specialist pharmacists was created from different care areas for patients with dysphagia. The creation of Deglufarm® consisted of several stages: selection of active drugs, literature review, content development, design (an expert company in App design was contacted), testing, launch, content update and follow-up. RESULTS: Deglufarm® is available for Android and IOS free of charge from July 2022. It has been tested among the members of the research group and collaborators, Currently, 540 monographs of active drugs have been reviewed and registered in Deglufarm. The first version is aimed at healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Deglufarm® is an easy tool to consult, with the most current evidence on handling the medicines it contains.

Safety and Effectiveness of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients with Laryngeal Dystonia: Final Report of a 52-Week, Multicenter Postmarketing Surveillance Study.

This postmarketing surveillance study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA in Japanese patients with laryngeal dystonia (LD). Patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA for the first time were enrolled and observed for up to 12 months following the first injection. Safety assessment included adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and effectiveness assessments included the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and physician's global assessment (PGA). ADRs were observed in 48 (5.8%) of 834 patients in the safety analysis set, including dysphonia in 43 (5.2%) patients and dysphagia in 7 (0.8%) patients. The change in total VHI-10 score (mean) in 790 patients included in the effectiveness analysis set showed that improvement in adductor LD peaked at 2 months after the first injection, while patients with abductor or mixed LD showed a gradual attenuation of effect 2-4 weeks post-injection. The change in total VHI-10 score in subsequent injections was generally similar to that following the first injection. The overall effectiveness rate according to the PGA was 93.4% (738/790 patients). The results demonstrate that onabotulinumtoxinA is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for LD in real-world clinical practice.

Long-term patient-reported outcomes after anti-reflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia repair: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia who are candidates for surgery should be treated with minimally invasive partial or total fundoplication. As data on long-term clinical and functional outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for GERD are limited, the aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of fundoplication in terms of patient-reported symptoms and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use. METHODS: The data of 88 patients who underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery for GERD between January 2007 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes were investigated after surgery using a 13-items Likert-Scale questionnaire based on the frequency (events/week) and severity of typical and atypical symptoms, dysphagia, and dyspepsia. Furthermore, variations in the use of PPIs were investigated as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients participated in the questionnaire survey. The median follow-up duration was 77 (2-165) months. The postoperative rate of mild and severe typical symptoms was significantly lower than the preoperative rate (P<0.01). Similarly, the atypical symptom rates decreased after surgery (P<0.05). Dysphagia was more frequent after fundoplication (P<0.01). Before the anti-reflux surgery, 94.7% of the patients were prescribed a PPI. At the time of follow-up, this proportion had decreased to 73.7% (P<0.01). However, the PPI intake rate was 90.9% in the group of patients interviewed >10 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients, laparoscopic anti-reflux fundoplication reduced the rate typical and atypical symptoms of GERD. However, surgery appeared to have no impact on PPI intake over time.

Deglufarm: Mobile application with recommendations for safety drug administration in patients with dysphagia or deglution disorders. / Deglufarm: aplicación móvil con recomendaciones para la administración segura de medicamentos en pacientes con disfagia o problemas de deglución.

OBJECTIVE: Develop an App to use in healthcare practice, with updated and accurate information on the handling of medications in patients with dysphagia or deglution disorders, as well as their compatibility with food and thickeners. METHODS: The development of the Deglufarm® App was based on the CRONOS, Nutrition and Techno working groups of the Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria. A group of specialist pharmacists was created from different care areas for patients with dysphagia. The creation of Deglufarm® consisted of several stages: Selection of active drugs, literature review, content development, design (an expert company in App design was contacted), testing, launch, content update and follow-up. RESULTS: Deglufarm® is available for Android and IOS free of charge from July 2022. It has been tested among the members of the research group and collaborators, currently, 540 monographs of active drugs have been reviewed and registered in Deglufarm. The first version is aimed at healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Deglufarm® is an easy tool to consult, with the most current evidence on handling the medicines it contains.

Effect of definitive hypo-fractionated radiotherapy concurrent with weekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

To mitigate the risk of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients, it is recommended to utilize hypo-fractionated treatment schedules that aim to minimize the overall duration of treatment. In this study, we aimed to determine whether hypo-fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (hypo-IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy was practical, effective, and could achieve acceptable tumor control rates for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We enrolled 62 patients with high-risk stage II, stage III, and IVA SCCHN who received hypo-IMRT (62.5 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks 2.5Gy/fraction with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2). Our primary endpoint was to assess acute toxicity, while our secondary endpoints were late toxicity, loco-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. The percentages of grade 3 acute pain, dermatitis, mucositis, and dysphagia were 71%, 19.4%, 72.6%, and 41.9%, respectively. The rates of late xerostomia, dysphagia, dental complications, grade 3 pain, and grade 3 weight loss were 72.6%, 62.9%, 27.4%, 4.8%, and 4.3%, respectively. At a median follow-up time of 24 months, 2-year loco-regional control and overall survival were 87.1% and 83.9%, respectively. Disease-free survival was 100%, 89.5%, and 69% in stages II, III, and IV%, respectively, with a significant p-value of 0.024. This regimen was effective and relatively safe, with acceptable and tolerable acute and late toxicity. Given the reduced need for hospital visits, hypo-fractionated schedules may represent an alternative treatment during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Mepolizumab for treatment of adolescents and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 antibody, was more effective than placebo for improving dysphagia symptoms and decreasing oesophageal eosinophil counts in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial. In the first part, patients aged 16-75 with EoE and dysphagia symptoms (per EoE Symptom Activity Index (EEsAI)) were randomised 1:1 to 3 months of mepolizumab 300 mg monthly or placebo. Primary outcome was change in EEsAI from baseline to month 3 (M3). Secondary outcomes included histological, endoscopic and safety metrics. In part 2, patients initially randomised to mepolizumab continued 300 mg monthly for 3 additional months (mepo/mepo), placebo patients started mepolizumab 100 mg monthly (pbo/mepo), and outcomes were reassessed at month 6 (M6). RESULTS: Of 66 patients randomised, 64 completed M3, and 56 completed M6. At M3, EEsAI decreased 15.4±18.1 with mepolizumab and 8.3±18.0 with placebo (p=0.14). Peak eosinophil counts decreased more with mepolizumab (113±77 to 36±43) than placebo (146±94 to 160±133) (p<0.001). With mepolizumab, 42% and 34% achieved histological responses of <15 and ≤6 eos/hpf compared with 3% and 3% with placebo (p<0.001 and 0.02). The change in EoE Endoscopic Reference Score at M3 was also larger with mepolizumab. At M6, EEsAI decreased 18.3±18.1 points for mepo/mepo and 18.6±19.2 for pbo/mepo (p=0.85). The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab did not achieve the primary endpoint of improving dysphagia symptoms compared with placebo. While eosinophil counts and endoscopic severity improved with mepolizumab at 3 months, longer treatment did not yield additional improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03656380.

Comparison between the use of hydrocolloids (xanthan gum) and high-pressure processing to obtain a texture-modified puree for dysphagia.

Enriched lentil protein vegetable purees (10% zucchini, 10% carrots, 2.5% extra virgin olive oil and 21.8% lentil protein concentrate) suitable for people with dysphagia were developed with 0.8% xanthan gum (XG) or 600 MPa/5 min high pressure processing (HPP) treatment with the aim of comparing their rheological and textural properties. Selection of the appropriate XG % and HPP conditions was made by performing initial pilot trials. Purees showed a good nutritional profile (12% protein, 3.4% fiber, 100 Kcal/100 g), being adequate for people with dysphagia. Microbiological testing of HPP treated purees indicated that it has a good shelf-life under refrigerated conditions 14 days). Both types of purees showed a gel-like character (tan delta 0.161-0.222) and higher firmness, consistency and cohesiveness than control samples. Comparing XG and HPP samples at time 0, HPP treated purees showed the highest stiffness ( G'), the lowest deformability capacity (yield strainLVR) and the lowest structural stability (yield stressLVR). With storage, HPP treatment samples showed significant increases in all rheological and textural parameters. These results confirm the suitability of HPP as an alternative technology to hydrocolloids for the obtained dysphagia dishes.

Pooled Safety Analysis of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Neurological Disorders in Adults.

The pooled incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were examined by indication using the integrated clinical database of Merz-sponsored, placebo-controlled, or repeat-dose studies of incobotulinumtoxinA in adults with cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, limb spasticity, sialorrhea, or essential tremor of the upper limb. Overall incidences of TEAEs, serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, fatal TEAEs, TEAEs of special interest (TEAESIs; indicating possible toxin spread), and treatment-related (TR) events were determined for incobotulinumtoxinA and placebo after a single injection and for repeated dose cycles of incobotulinumtoxinA. The most frequent events after a single dose of incobotulinumtoxinA are summarized. After a single cycle, incidences of overall TEAEs were similar between incobotulinumtoxinA and the placebo in most indications, although between-indication differences were observed. Few TEAEs led to incobotulinumtoxinA discontinuation; there were no fatal TEAEs with incobotulinumtoxinA. In general, repeated cycles did not increase the incidence of any event. The most frequent TR-TEAEs were indication-dependent, including dysphagia for indications affecting the head or neck. The TR-TEAESIs across all indications were most commonly muscular weakness, dysphagia and dry mouth. Overall, the results of this pooled analysis support and extend the favorable safety and tolerability profile of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of adult neurological disorders established by individual clinical studies.

The effects of safinamide on dysphagia in Parkinson's disease.

Dysphagia is a potentially fatal symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) and is characterized by frequent silent aspiration, a risk factor for aspiration pneumonia. The transdermal dopamine agonist rotigotine alleviates dysphagia in patients with PD and is more effective than oral levodopa, suggesting the importance of continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS) in swallowing. Safinamide is a monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) inhibitor that facilitates CDS. In this retrospective open-label evaluator-blinded research, swallowing functions in nine patients with PD were examined using a video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) before and after treatment with 50 mg of oral safinamide. The VFSS results showed that safinamide significantly improved some swallowing measures during oral and pharyngeal phases, including oral transit time and pharyngeal transit time, without worsening of any measures. Notably, improvements in lip closure, an oral phase component, seemed to be most attributable to improvements in oral phase scores. In conclusion, a medicine for CDS may effectively improve swallowing functions in patients with PD. This is the first study to show that the MAOB inhibitor safinamide partly but significantly improves swallowing function in patients with PD.