Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 111
Filter
5.
J Dent Hyg ; 91(4): 12-20, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29118079

ABSTRACT

Purpose: A total of 40 states to date have expanded the role of dental hygienists with the goal of improving access to basic oral health services for underserved populations. In Kansas, legislative changes have resulted in the Extended Care Permit (ECP) designation. The purpose of this study is to describe the experiences of registered dental hygienists in Kansas holding ECP certificates (ECP RDH) as of July of 2014.Methods: Secondary data analysis was performed utilizing data collected from a survey conducted in 2014 by Oral Health Kansas. All registered ECP RDH's were sent the 32-item survey via Survey Monkey®. Descriptive statistical analyses consisted of frequency distributions, and measures of central tendency. Inferential analyses using t-tests and ANOVA were conducted to compare groups.Results: A total of 73 responses were received from the (n= 176) surveys that were e-mailed for a 41% response rate. Of the clinicians who responded, 80%, worked at least part-time and in school settings. The most consistent barriers to providing care were the inability to directly bill insurance (52%), financial sustainability (42%) and physical requirements (42%). Follow-up tests found significant differencs between clinician groups when examining barriers.Conclusion: Although the ECP legislation appears to be expanding access to care for citizens in Kansas, significant barriers still exist in making this a viable model for oral healthcare delivery.


Subject(s)
Dental Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Hygienists/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Hygienists/psychology , Health Services Accessibility , Long-Term Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Attitude of Health Personnel , Delegation, Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Health Services , Eligibility Determination , Employment , Financial Support , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Insurance, Dental , Kansas , Oral Health , Practice Patterns, Dentists' , Problem Solving , Professional Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , School Dentistry , Workplace
6.
Am J Public Health ; 107(S1): S56-S60, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28661808

ABSTRACT

We examine a strategy for improving oral health in the United States by focusing on low-income children in school-based settings. Vulnerable children often experience cultural, social, economic, structural, and geographic barriers when trying to access dental services in traditional dental office settings. These disparities have been discussed for more than a decade in multiple US Department of Health and Human Services publications. One solution is to revise dental practice acts to allow registered dental hygienists increased scope of services, expanded public health delivery opportunities, and decreased dentist supervision. We provide examples of how federally qualified health centers have implemented successful school-based dental models within the parameters of two state policies that allow registered dental hygienists varying levels of dentist supervision. Changes to dental practice acts at the state level allowing registered dental hygienists to practice with limited supervision in community settings, such as schools, may provide vulnerable populations greater access to screening and preventive services. We derive our recommendations from expert opinion.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Children/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Hygienists/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health Dentistry/organization & administration , School Dentistry , Child , Delegation, Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Care for Children/economics , Dental Hygienists/supply & distribution , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Medically Underserved Area , Minority Groups , Oral Health , Poverty , United States
8.
Gesundheitswesen ; 78(10): 622-627, 2016 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27414058

ABSTRACT

Objective: Triggered by the AGnES model project of the University Medicine Greifswald, the Code of Social Law V was changed by the German Lower and Upper House of Parliament (Bundestag and Bundesrat) in 2008 so that the delegation of GP's activities to non-physician colleagues was allowed under highly restricted preconditions. Delegated home visits should become an integral part of the standard care in Germany. In this study, the implementation of § 87 para 2b clause 5 SGB V, established in Annex 8 of the Federal Collective Agreement, was checked for its legality in terms of qualification. Methods: The problem was checked with the legal methods of interpretation in pursuance of the norm and the methods of systematic, historic and teleologic interpretation. Results: Even though the Parliament clearly required orientation to the AGnES model project (in order to assure safety and effective care of delegated home visits), self-management in the implementation of the law remained far behind these guidelines. The main outcome of the legal analysis was that the implementation arrangements of the Code of Social Law V are predominantly illegal. Conclusions: The parties of the Federal Collective Agreement have to change the arrangements to meet the requirements of the Parliament and to avoid risks of liability for delegating GPs.


Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Delegation, Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Family Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Home Care Services/legislation & jurisprudence , House Calls , Physicians, Family/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Government Regulation , Guideline Adherence/legislation & jurisprudence
14.
Rev Infirm ; (208): 19-20, 2015 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26144822

ABSTRACT

Healthcare assistants are authorised to perform nursing procedures in accordance with regulated conditions. They do not perform their functions autonomously but carry out their actions within the framework of the nurse's responsibilities.


Subject(s)
Delegation, Professional , Nurse's Role , Nursing Assistants , Delegation, Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Delegation, Professional/organization & administration , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Nursing Assistants/legislation & jurisprudence , Nursing Assistants/organization & administration , Professional Role
17.
Odontostomatol Trop ; 38(150): 37-45, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26934771

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine Nigerian dentists' opinion on expanded function dental auxiliaries. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of Nigerian dentists attending a dental conference was conducting in 2012 using self-administered questionnaire. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 16.0. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The majority of the 82 dentists that participated in this study were male, aged 31-40 years, either specialist or specializing (residents), practiced for < 10 years, teaching hospital and urban practitioners. Of the participants, 22 (26.8%) reported favorable opinion towards expanded duty dental auxiliaries. The mean scores on consequences, of expanded function dental auxiliaries ranked redundancy of dentist as highest. Males and non-specialist significantly reported expanded function dental auxiliaries would lead to redundancy of dentists. Practitioners working in other hospitals other than teaching hospital significantly reported that appropriate legislation are necessary before expansion of duties of the dental auxiliaries can be done. The dentists with favorable opinion significantly reported that expanded duty dental auxiliaries would not cause redundancy of dentist and the task are not too difficult for dental auxiliaries with necessary training but will increase service delivery and efficiency, increase job satisfaction, lead to dental auxiliary specialization with legislation. CONCLUSION: Data from this study revealed overall unfavorable opinion of Nigerian dentists on the expanded duty dental auxiliaries. However, those with favorable opinion were significantly supportive of expanded function dental auxiliaries. This information would serve as a useful tool for Nigerian oral healthcare policy formulators.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Delegation, Professional , Dental Auxiliaries , Dentists/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delegation, Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Auxiliaries/education , Dental Auxiliaries/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Care/organization & administration , Dental Staff, Hospital , Efficiency, Organizational , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Nigeria , Professional Practice , Professional Practice Location , Specialties, Dental , Urban Population , Young Adult
20.
J Dent Hyg ; 88(6): 364-72, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25534689

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In 2003, Kansas addressed their access to oral health care needs with amended state dental practice act for registered dental hygienists. The Extended Care Permits (ECP) I, II and III have expanded the dental hygiene scope of practice, allowing dental hygienists to provide oral care to Kansans in different settings beyond the dental office. The purpoase of this study was to examine the perceptions of Kansas ECP dental hygienists on change to oral care in Kansas. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all ECP dental hygienists (n=158) registered with the Kansas Dental Board. Questions were open-ended, close-ended and Likert scale. Information was sought regarding demographics, areas of employment, work related activities and impact to oral health care. Study exclusions included ECP providers no longer practicing in Kansas, practice more than 50% in another state or no longer practice dental hygiene at all. RESULTS: A total of 69 surveys were returned, with 9 surveys excluded for exclusion criteria. Most respondents (92%) agreed the ECP is a solution to oral health care access issues in Kansas. Barriers to utilizing their permits fully included: difficulty locating a sponsoring dentist (12%), locating start up finances (22%), limited work space (14%) and difficulty with facility administrators (39%). Many respondents (62%) agreed the proposed registered dental practitioner would improve access to oral health care to Kansans. CONCLUSION: The Extended Care Permit providers in Kansas appear to be satisfied with their current employment situations and feel oral health care has improved for their patients served but they are unable to utilize their permits fully for various reasons.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Delegation, Professional , Dental Care , Dental Hygienists/psychology , Professional Practice , Administrative Personnel , Adult , Aged , Delegation, Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Hygienists/legislation & jurisprudence , Dentists , Employment , Female , Financial Support , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Job Satisfaction , Kansas , Male , Middle Aged , Professional Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Workplace
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...