Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 16.050
Filter
1.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 73, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714920

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is complex requiring contributions from multiple specialized disciplines. In practice, this creates considerable organizational and communicational challenges. To meet those challenges, we established an interdisciplinary integrated outpatient clinic for IIH with a central coordination and a one-stop- concept. Here, we aimed to evaluate effects of this concept on sick leave, presenteeism, and health care utilization. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we compared the one-stop era with integrated care (IC, 1-JUL-2021 to 31-DEC-2022) to a reference group receiving standard care (SC, 1-JUL-2018 to 31-DEC-2019) regarding economic outcome parameters assessed over 6 months. Multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the IC group (n = 85) and SC group (n = 81) were comparable (female: 90.6% vs. 90.1%; mean age: 33.6 vs. 32.8 years, educational level: ≥9 years of education 60.0% vs. 59.3%; located in Vienna 75.3% vs. 76.5%). Compared to SC, the IC group showed significantly fewer days with sick leave or presenteeism (-5 days/month), fewer unscheduled contacts for IIH-specific problems (-2.3/month), and fewer physician or hospital contacts in general (-4.1 contacts/month). Subgroup analyses of patients with migration background and language barrier consistently indicated stronger effects of the IC concept in these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary integrated management significantly improves the burden of IIH in terms of sick leave, presenteeism and healthcare consultations - particularly in socioeconomically underprivileged patient groups.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Presenteeism , Pseudotumor Cerebri , Sick Leave , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Presenteeism/statistics & numerical data , Pseudotumor Cerebri/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged
2.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e083077, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806435

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The economic case for preventive care delivered in or near citizens' homes is strong, and there is growing evidence of the role of local-level support in supporting people's health and well-being as they age. However, effective and consistent delivery of person-centred integrated care (PIC) at the community level remains elusive. Previous systematic reviews have focused on specific processes such as case management, but none have focused on the operational delivery of community-based care networks. In this study, we aim to identify what practice-based models of PIC networks exist at the local/neighbourhood level and what evidence is available as to their effectiveness for healthy ageing in place. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will undertake a scoping review following the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and updated guidance by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Peer-reviewed sources will be identified through searches of seven databases, and relevant grey literature will be identified through websites of policy and voluntary sector organisations focused on integrated care and/or healthy ageing. Data from included studies will be extracted for relevance to the research questions, including aims and anticipated outcomes of network models, financial and management structures of networks, and evidence of evaluation. Summary tables and narrative comparisons of key PIC network features across settings will be presented. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no primary data will be collected, ethical approval is not required to conduct this scoping review. In addition to publication as a peer-reviewed article, the results of this review will be summarised as shorter discussion papers for use in follow-up research.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Healthy Aging , Patient-Centered Care , Humans , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Independent Living , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Research Design , Community Networks/organization & administration
6.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 672, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807134

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adolescents living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) have an increased risk of depression, negatively affecting their adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and treatment outcomes. Integrating mental health care in HIV care and treatment settings improves comprehensive care. However, integration remains challenging in Tanzania, like in other high-burden and low-resource settings. The overall objective of this work is to inform the development of a psychological intervention for depression in adolescents living with HIV (ALWHIV). We describe perceived barriers and opportunities for implementing an integrated, evidence-based psychological intervention to manage adolescent depression in HIV care and treatment centers (HIV-CTC) from the perspectives of adolescents, caregivers, and healthcare providers (HCPs) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. METHODS: To inform intervention development and implementation, this study utilized a qualitative design through a phenomenological approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore implementation barriers and facilitators in ALWHIV, HCPs, and caregivers. Forty-five in-depth interviews were conducted in three HIV-CTCs in Kinondoni Dar es Salaam. Audio records were transcribed verbatim and analyzed deductively through NVIVO software. RESULTS: Barriers to implementing an integrated psychological intervention to address depression in ALWHIV included (A) poor mental health awareness among caregivers, adolescents, HCPs, and policy-makers, (B) high level of stigma against mental health care, (C) poor communication between adolescents and HCPs concerning mental health care, (D) lack of contextualized intervention of proven effectiveness and guidelines of mental health care, and (E) inadequate mental health care supportive supervision and mentorship. Facilitators for implementation included supportive infrastructure, positive pressure from HIV implementing partners, tension for change, and participant's perception of the advantage of a psychological intervention as compared to just usual HIV care and treatment counseling. CONCLUSION: Despite several modifiable barriers to implementing a psychological intervention in HIV CTC, there were encouraging facilitators and opportunities for implementing an integrated, evidence-based psychological intervention to address depression in ALWHIV in Kinondoni Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.


Subject(s)
Depression , HIV Infections , Qualitative Research , Humans , Adolescent , Tanzania , HIV Infections/psychology , HIV Infections/therapy , Male , Female , Depression/therapy , Depression/psychology , Psychosocial Intervention/methods , Caregivers/psychology , Social Stigma , Interviews as Topic , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration
7.
BMC Med ; 22(1): 212, 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807210

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To examine the effectiveness and safety of a data sharing and comprehensive management platform for institutionalized older patients. METHODS: We applied information technology-supported integrated health service platform to patients who live at long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) and nursing homes (NHs) with cluster randomized controlled study. We enrolled 555 patients aged 65 or older (461 from 7 LTCHs, 94 from 5 NHs). For the intervention group, a tablet-based platform comprising comprehensive geriatric assessment, disease management, potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) management, rehabilitation program, and screening for adverse events and warning alarms were provided for physicians or nurses. The control group was managed with usual care. Co-primary outcomes were (1) control rate of hypertension and diabetes, (2) medication adjustment (PIM prescription rate, proportion of polypharmacy), and (3) combination of potential quality-of-care problems (composite quality indicator) from the interRAI assessment system which assessed after 3-month of intervention. RESULTS: We screened 1119 patients and included 555 patients (control; 289, intervention; 266) for analysis. Patients allocated to the intervention group had better cognitive function and took less medications and PIMs at baseline. The diabetes control rate (OR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.37-4.99, p = 0.0035), discontinuation of PIM (OR = 4.65, 95% CI 2.41-8.97, p < 0.0001), reduction of medication in patients with polypharmacy (OR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.24-3.16, p = 0.0042), and number of PIMs use (ꞵ = - 0.27, p < 0.0001) improved significantly in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in hypertension control rate (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.20-1.43, p = 0.2129), proportion of polypharmacy (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.75-2.60, p = 0.2863), and improvement of composite quality indicators (ꞵ = 0.03, p = 0.2094). For secondary outcomes, cognitive and motor function, quality of life, and unplanned hospitalization were not different significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The information technology-supported integrated health service effectively reduced PIM use and controlled diabetes among older patients in LTCH or NH without functional decline or increase of healthcare utilization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0004360. Registered on 21 October 2019.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Long-Term Care , Humans , Aged , Male , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Long-Term Care/methods , Information Technology , Nursing Homes , Polypharmacy
8.
JMIR Ment Health ; 11: e56812, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771217

ABSTRACT

Background: Mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders are chronic pediatric conditions, and their prevalence has been on the rise over recent decades. Affected children have long-term health sequelae and a decline in health-related quality of life. Due to the lack of a validated database for pharmacoepidemiological research on selected mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders, there is uncertainty in their reported prevalence in the literature. objectives: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of coding related to pediatric mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders in a large integrated health care system's electronic health records (EHRs) and compare the coding quality before and after the implementation of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coding as well as before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Medical records of 1200 member children aged 2-17 years with at least 1 clinical visit before the COVID-19 pandemic (January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014, the ICD-9-CM coding period; and January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, the ICD-10-CM coding period) and after the COVID-19 pandemic (January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022) were selected with stratified random sampling from EHRs for chart review. Two trained research associates reviewed the EHRs for all potential cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), major depression disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder (AD), and disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) in children during the study period. Children were considered cases only if there was a mention of any one of the conditions (yes for diagnosis) in the electronic chart during the corresponding time period. The validity of diagnosis codes was evaluated by directly comparing them with the gold standard of chart abstraction using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, the summary statistics of the F-score, and Youden J statistic. κ statistic for interrater reliability among the 2 abstractors was calculated. Results: The overall agreement between the identification of mental, behavioral, and emotional conditions using diagnosis codes compared to medical record abstraction was strong and similar across the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM coding periods as well as during the prepandemic and pandemic time periods. The performance of AD coding, while strong, was relatively lower compared to the other conditions. The weighted sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for each of the 5 conditions were as follows: 100%, 100%, 99.2%, and 100%, respectively, for ASD; 100%, 99.9%, 99.2%, and 100%, respectively, for ADHD; 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively for DBD; 87.7%, 100%, 100%, and 99.2%, respectively, for AD; and 100%, 100%, 99.2%, and 100%, respectively, for MDD. The F-score and Youden J statistic ranged between 87.7% and 100%. The overall agreement between abstractors was almost perfect (κ=95%). Conclusions: Diagnostic codes are quite reliable for identifying selected childhood mental, behavioral, and emotional conditions. The findings remained similar during the pandemic and after the implementation of the ICD-10-CM coding in the EHR system.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Electronic Health Records , Mental Disorders , Neurodevelopmental Disorders , Humans , Child , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/epidemiology , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , International Classification of Diseases , Clinical Coding
9.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302815, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771818

ABSTRACT

The Strengthening Care for Children (SC4C) is a general practitioner (GP)-paediatrician integrated model of care that consists of co-consulting sessions and case discussions in the general practice setting, with email and telephone support provided by paediatricians to GPs during weekdays. This model was implemented in 21 general practices in Australia (11 Victoria and 10 New South Wales). Our study aimed to identify the factors moderating the implementation of SC4C from the perspectives of GPs, general practice personnel, paediatricians and families. We conducted a qualitative study as part of the mixed-methods implementation evaluation of the SC4C trial. We collected data through virtual and in-person focus groups at the general practices and phone, virtual and in-person interviews. Data was analysed using an iterative hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis. Twenty-one focus groups and thirty-seven interviews were conducted. Overall, participants found SC4C acceptable and suitable for general practices, with GPs willing to learn and expand their paediatric care role. GPs cited improved confidence and knowledge due to the model. Paediatricians reported an enhanced understanding of the general practice context and the strain under which GPs work. GPs and paediatricians reported that this model allowed them to build trust-based relationships with a common goal of improving care for children. Additionally, they felt some aspects, including the lack of remuneration and the work and effort required to deliver the model, need to be considered for the long-term success of the model. Families expressed their satisfaction with the shared knowledge and quality of care jointly delivered by GPs and paediatricians and highlighted that this model of care provides easy access to specialty services without out-of-pocket costs. Future research should focus on finding strategies to ensure the long-term Implementation of this model of care with a particular focus on the individual stressors in general practices.


Subject(s)
General Practice , General Practitioners , Humans , General Practitioners/psychology , General Practice/organization & administration , Child , Pediatricians/psychology , Male , Female , Australia , Focus Groups , Qualitative Research , Pediatrics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
10.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 314: 58-62, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785004

ABSTRACT

Stroke remains a significant global health burden, with substantial costs and morbidity associated with its occurrence. To address this challenge, STROKE 5.0 proposes a comprehensive approach to stroke care management, integrating advanced digital technologies and clinical expertise. This paper presents the rationale, design, and potential impact of the STROKE 5.0 platform, which aims to optimize stroke care delivery from pre-hospital assessment through acute hospitalization. The platform facilitates early symptom recognition, efficient emergency response, and streamlined hospital management through intelligent decision support systems. By leveraging predictive analytics and personalized care pathways, STROKE 5.0 seeks to enhance clinical outcomes while providing a platform capable of optimizing the efficiency of service delivery. This innovative model represents a proactive shift towards evidence-based, patient-centered stroke care, with implications for healthcare quality improvement and resource allocation in the digital health domain.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Stroke , Humans , Stroke/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
11.
Health Expect ; 27(3): e14084, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773931

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Integrated care is based around values of involvement and shared decision-making, but these are not often reflected within planning and implementation. Barriers include continued emphasis on professional and managerial perspectives, skills gaps on how best to engage people and communities and insufficient investment in involvement infrastructure. Despite such challenges, people with lived experience have still led changes in policy and services. DESIGN: Qualitative study involving 25 participants with lived experience from 12 countries. Participants shared their background stories and engaged in semistructured interviews relating to leadership identity, experience of influencing and personal learning. Transcripts were analysed through a framework approach informed by narrative principles. RESULTS: Participants were motivated by their own experiences and a wish to improve care for future individuals and communities. Sharing their story was often the entry point for such influencing. Participants gained skills and confidence in story telling despite a lack of support and development. Many felt comfortable being described as a leader while others rejected this identity and preferred a different title. No common alternative term to leader was identified. Influencing services required considerable personal cost but also led to new networks, skills development and satisfaction when change was achieved. DISCUSSION: Leadership within integrated care is often awarded to those with structural power related to management or clinical seniority. People with lived experience are though uniquely placed to identify what needs to change and can develop inspiring visions based around their personal stories. Claiming identity as leader can be challenging due to traditional notions of who is eligible to lead and unwillingness by professionals and managers to grant such identity. CONCLUSIONS: People with lived experience should be recognised as leaders of integrated care and have access to developmental opportunities and practical support to strengthen their skills, including that of storytelling. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The research was instigated on the request of a community advisory board of people with lived experience who shaped its design, contributed to the analysis and informed the conclusions and implications.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Interviews as Topic , Leadership , Qualitative Research , Humans , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Narration
12.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0304312, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781176

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The population with serious mental illness has high risk for hospitalization or death due to unhealthy behaviors and inadequate medical care, though the level of risk varies substantially. Programs that integrate medical and psychiatric services improve outcomes but are challenging to implement and access is limited. It would be useful to know whether benefits are confined to patients with specific levels of risk. METHODS: In a population with serious mental illness and increased risk for hospitalization or death, a specialized medical home integrated services and improved treatment and outcomes. Treatment quality, chronic illness care, care experience, symptoms, and quality of life were assessed for a median of 385 days. Analyses examine whether improvements varied by baseline level of patient risk. RESULTS: Patients with greater risk were more likely to be older, more cognitively impaired, and have worse mental health. Integrated services increased appropriate screening for body mass index, lipids, and glucose, but increases did not differ significantly by level of risk. Integrated services also improved chronic illness care, care experience, mental health-related quality of life, and psychotic symptoms. There were also no significant differences by risk level. CONCLUSIONS: There were benefits from integration of primary care and psychiatric care at all levels of increased risk, including those with extremely high risk above the 95th percentile. When developing integrated care programs, patients should be considered at all levels of risk, not only those who are the healthiest.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Primary Health Care , Quality of Life , Humans , Male , Female , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Adult , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Hospitalization , Aged
13.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301715, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781188

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We examined whether the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), a widely adopted tool for stratifying the degree of frailty, and the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-based Integrated Care System 21-items (DASC-21), a simple tool for simultaneous assessment of impaired cognition and impaired ADL, at the time of initiation of hemodialysis is useful tool of older patients for the outcome and prognosis. METHODS: Data for 101 patients aged 75 years or older (mean age, 84.3 years) with ESRD who were initiated on hemodialysis and could be followed up for a period of 6 months were reviewed. RESULTS: The 6-month survival curves showed a significantly higher number of deaths in the frailty (CFS≥5) group than in the normal to vulnerable (CFS<5) group (p<0.01). The CFS level was also significantly higher (6.5±1.5) in patients who died within 6 months of dialysis initiation as compared with that (4.6±1.7) in patients who survived (p<0.01). On the other hand, the total score of DASC-21 was related to need for inpatient maintenance dialysis (p<0.01). The total score on the DASC-21 were found as showing significant correlations with the CFS level. The IADL outside the home was identified in the DASC-21 sub-analyses as being correlated with CFS. CONCLUSIONS: The CFS and the DASC-21 appeared to be a useful predictive tool of outcome and prognosis for older patients being initiated on hemodialysis. Assessment by the CFS or the DASC-21 might be useful for selecting the renal replacement therapy by shared decision-making and for advance care planning.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Frailty , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dementia/therapy , Dementia/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Prognosis , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
14.
Wiad Lek ; 77(3): 506-513, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691793

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To study and analyze the attitude of women of reproductive age to the integrated gynecological care provision by family physicians, their readiness to receive some gynecological services from family physicians, as well as to analyze the level of women's support and readiness for the integrated provision of gynecological care depending on age and level of education. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: For the survey, anonymous questionnaires containing questions on the attitude of women of reproductive age to the integrated provision of certain types of gynecological care by family physicians were developed. 181 women from the Kyiv region took part in the survey. RESULTS: Results: Support of more than 80% of respondents regarding the integrated gynecological care provision by family physicians received the following questions: counseling on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (92,3%); counseling on family planning and prevention of unwanted pregnancy (83,4%); counseling on the use of various methods of contraception (82,3%); examination and palpation of mammary glands (80,1%); referral of women to a higher level of obstetric and gynecological care (if necessary (86,2%). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The majority of respondents (67,4%) are ready or better ready than not ready to receive certain types of gynecological care services from family physicians. Almost the same percentage ratio (more than 60%) of women of each age group and all levels of education are ready or better ready than not ready to receive gynecological care services, which they supported, from family physicians.


Subject(s)
Gynecology , Humans , Female , Adult , Gynecology/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Ukraine , Middle Aged , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Physicians, Family/psychology , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Family Practice , Adolescent
16.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(5): e165-e168, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748917

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Given the problematic fragmentation of care for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), a kidney care organization and an integrated health system within a large accountable care organization partnered to best utilize their individual capabilities to collaborate around their shared patients in a coordinated care approach. Ultimately, the goal of the program is to allow care teams to achieve the triple aim of improving the patient experience, improving clinical outcomes, and reducing the total cost of health care. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective examination of the first year of the Shared Patient Care Coordination (SPCC) program. METHODS: The analysis consisted of 2 parts. First, rates of hospitalizations and emergency department visits were compared between the SPCC patients and other patients of the integrated health system who had ESKD but did not participate in SPCC. Second, rates of clinical indicators-central venous catheter (CVC) use, home dialysis, advance care planning, and missed dialysis treatments-were benchmarked vs normative data taken by bootstrap sampling of the kidney care organization's patient population. RESULTS: Overall, dialysis patients participating in the SPCC program had a 15% lower rate of hospital admissions than those not participating ( P = .02). Additionally, the bootstrap analysis showed that by the second year, dialysis patients in the program had favorable rates (above the 95th percentile) of CVC use, dialysis treatment absenteeism, and completion of advance care plans. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced and structured communication between dialysis providers and patient care teams provides a unique opportunity to coordinate patient-centered care and improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Accountable Care Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Renal Dialysis , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration
18.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 310, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724953

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Integrated Community Case Management (ICCM) of common childhood illness is one of the global initiatives to reduce mortality among under-five children by two-thirds. It is also implemented in Ethiopia to improve community access and coverage of health services. However, as per our best knowledge the implementation status of integrated community case management in the study area is not well evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the implementation status of the integrated community case management program in Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A single case study design with mixed methods was employed to evaluate the process of integrated community case management for common childhood illness in Gondar town from March 17 to April 17, 2022. The availability, compliance, and acceptability dimensions of the program implementation were evaluated using 49 indicators. In this evaluation, 484 mothers or caregivers participated in exit interviews; 230 records were reviewed, 21 key informants were interviewed; and 42 observations were included. To identify the predictor variables associated with acceptability, we used a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Statistically significant variables were identified based on the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value. The qualitative data was recorded, transcribed, and translated into English, and thematic analysis was carried out. RESULTS: The overall implementation of integrated community case management was 81.5%, of which availability (84.2%), compliance (83.1%), and acceptability (75.3%) contributed. Some drugs and medical equipment, like Cotrimoxazole, vitamin K, a timer, and a resuscitation bag, were stocked out. Health care providers complained that lack of refreshment training and continuous supportive supervision was the common challenges that led to a skill gap for effective program delivery. Educational status (primary AOR = 0.27, 95% CI:0.11-0.52), secondary AOR = 0.16, 95% CI:0.07-0.39), and college and above AOR = 0.08, 95% CI:0.07-0.39), prescribed drug availability (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI:1.14-4.10), travel time to the to the ICCM site (AOR = 3.8, 95% CI:1.99-7.35), and waiting time (AOR = 2.80, 95% CI:1.16-6.79) were factors associated with the acceptability of the program by caregivers. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The overall implementation status of the integrated community case management program was judged as good. However, there were gaps observed in the assessment, classification, and treatment of diseases. Educational status, availability of the prescribed drugs, waiting time and travel time to integrated community case management sites were factors associated with the program acceptability. Continuous supportive supervision for health facilities, refreshment training for HEW's to maximize compliance, construction clean water sources for HPs, and conducting longitudinal studies for the future are the forwarded recommendation.


Subject(s)
Case Management , Program Evaluation , Humans , Ethiopia , Case Management/organization & administration , Female , Child, Preschool , Male , Infant , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Child Health Services/organization & administration , Adult , Young Adult , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Adolescent
19.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 611, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Integrated primary care programs for patients living with chronic pain which are accessible, interdisciplinary, and patient-centered are needed for preventing chronicity and improving outcomes. Evaluation of the implementation and impact of such programs supports further development of primary care chronic pain management. This study examined patient-reported outcomes among individuals with low back pain (LBP) receiving care in a novel interdisciplinary primary care program. METHODS: Patients were referred by primary care physicians in four regions of Quebec, Canada, and eligible patients received an evidence-based interdisciplinary pain management program over a six-month period. Patients were screened for risk of chronicity. Patient-reported outcome measures of pain interference and intensity, physical function, depression, and anxiety were evaluated at regular intervals over the six-month follow-up. A multilevel regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between patient characteristics at baseline, including risk of chronicity, and change in pain outcomes. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-four individuals (mean age 55.4y, 63% female) completed the program. The majority (≥ 60%) experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in pain intensity and interference at six months. Patients with moderate (71%) or high risk (81%) of chronicity showed greater improvement in pain interference than those with low risk (51%). Significant predictors of improvement in pain interference included a higher risk of chronicity, younger age, female sex, and lower baseline disability. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of this novel LBP program will inform wider implementation considerations by identifying key components for further effectiveness, sustainability, and scale-up of the program.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Low Back Pain , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Primary Health Care , Humans , Female , Male , Low Back Pain/therapy , Low Back Pain/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Quebec , Chronic Pain/therapy , Adult , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Pain Management/methods , Aged , Pain Measurement
20.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 37(2): 228-241, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical scribes have been utilized to reduce electronic health record (EHR) associated documentation burden. Although evidence suggests benefits to scribes, no large-scale studies have quantitatively evaluated scribe impact on physician documentation across clinical settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of scribes on physician EHR documentation behaviors and performance. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used EHR audit log data from a large academic health system to evaluate clinical documentation for all ambulatory encounters between January 2014 and December 2019 to evaluate the effect of scribes on physician documentation behaviors. Scribe services were provided on a first-come, first-served basis on physician request. Based on a physician's scribe use, encounters were grouped into 3 categories: never using a scribe, prescribe (before scribe use), or using a scribe. Outcomes included chart closure time, the proportion of delinquent charts, and charts closed after-hours. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-five physicians (23% scribe users) across 29 medical subspecialties, encompassing 1,132,487 encounters, were included in the analysis. At baseline, scribe users had higher chart closure time, delinquent charts, and after-hours documentation than physicians who never used scribes. Among scribe users, the difference in outcome measures postscribe compared with baseline varied, and using a scribe rarely resulted in outcome measures approaching a range similar to the performance levels of nonusing physicians. In addition, there was variability in outcome measures across medical specialties and within similar subspecialties. CONCLUSION: Although scribes may improve documentation efficiency among some physicians, not all will improve EHR-related documentation practices. Different strategies may help to optimize documentation behaviors of physician-scribe dyads and maximize outcomes of scribe implementation.


Subject(s)
Documentation , Electronic Health Records , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Documentation/methods , Documentation/standards , Documentation/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...