Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Rev Saude Publica ; 52: 35, 2018 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29641659

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the provision of clinical dental care, by means of the main curative procedures recommended in Primary Health Care, is associated with team structural characteristics, considering the presence of a minimum set of equipment, instrument, and supplies in Brazil's primary health care services. METHODS: A cross-sectional exploratory study based on data collected from 18,114 primary healthcare services with dental health teams in Brazil, in 2014. The outcome was created from the confirmation of five clinical procedures performed by the dentist, accounting for the presence of minimum equipment, instrument, and supplies to carry them out. Covariables were related to structural characteristics. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to obtain crude and adjusted prevalence ratios, with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 1,190 (6.5%) dental health teams did not present the minimum equipment to provide clinical dental care and only 2,498 (14.8%) had all the instrument and supplies needed and provided the five curative procedures assessed. There was a positive association between the outcome and the composition of dental health teams, higher workload, performing analysis of health condition, and monitoring of oral health indicators. Additionally, the dental health teams that planned and programmed oral health actions with the primary care team monthly provided the procedures more frequently. Dentists with better employment status, career plans, graduation in public health or those who underwent permanent education activities provided the procedures more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: A relevant number of Primary Health Care services did not have the infrastructure to provide clinical dental care. However, better results were found in dental health teams with oral health technicians, with higher workload and that plan their activities, as well as in those that employed dentists with better working relationships, who had dentists with degrees in public health and who underwent permanent education activities.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Dental Health Services/supply & distribution , Dental Instruments/supply & distribution , Oral Health/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Workforce
2.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 52: 35, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-903451

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate if the provision of clinical dental care, by means of the main curative procedures recommended in Primary Health Care, is associated with team structural characteristics, considering the presence of a minimum set of equipment, instrument, and supplies in Brazil's primary health care services. METHODS A cross-sectional exploratory study based on data collected from 18,114 primary healthcare services with dental health teams in Brazil, in 2014. The outcome was created from the confirmation of five clinical procedures performed by the dentist, accounting for the presence of minimum equipment, instrument, and supplies to carry them out. Covariables were related to structural characteristics. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to obtain crude and adjusted prevalence ratios, with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS A total of 1,190 (6.5%) dental health teams did not present the minimum equipment to provide clinical dental care and only 2,498 (14.8%) had all the instrument and supplies needed and provided the five curative procedures assessed. There was a positive association between the outcome and the composition of dental health teams, higher workload, performing analysis of health condition, and monitoring of oral health indicators. Additionally, the dental health teams that planned and programmed oral health actions with the primary care team monthly provided the procedures more frequently. Dentists with better employment status, career plans, graduation in public health or those who underwent permanent education activities provided the procedures more frequently. CONCLUSIONS A relevant number of Primary Health Care services did not have the infrastructure to provide clinical dental care. However, better results were found in dental health teams with oral health technicians, with higher workload and that plan their activities, as well as in those that employed dentists with better working relationships, who had dentists with degrees in public health and who underwent permanent education activities.


Subject(s)
Humans , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Oral Health , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Dental Health Services/supply & distribution , Dental Instruments/supply & distribution , Brazil , Serial Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Workforce
3.
Spec Care Dentist ; 32(2): 42-8, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22416985

ABSTRACT

This study of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) updates trends in utilization of dental services between 1998 and 2006 for community-dwelling U.S. adults of age 65 years and older. Bivariate comparisons were made between dependent variables (annual dental visits and types of dental procedures) and independent variables (age, gender, race, income, education, population density, marital status, U.S. Census Bureau regions, and self-reported health). The estimated percentage of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries with a dental visit for the years studied increased from 45.0% in 1998 to 46.3% in 2006. The age group of respondents who were 85 years and older had the greatest percentage increase in dental visits. Those reporting visits with preventive procedures increased from 87.8% to 91.2% whereas those reporting visits with nonpreventive procedures declined from 63.9% to 58.4%. The prevalence of dental visits continues to trend upward for this population of older adults. Increasing delivery of preventive services will likely impact the future mix of dental services as U.S. adults live longer.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Aged/trends , Dental Health Services/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dental Care for Aged/classification , Dental Care for Aged/statistics & numerical data , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Female , Health Status , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Independent Living/statistics & numerical data , Male , Marital Status , Medicare/trends , Population Density , Preventive Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Dentistry/trends , Self Concept , United States , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data
4.
Community Dent Health ; 29(4): 309-14, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23488215

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To use industrial organisation and organisational ecology research methods to survey industry structures and performance in the markets for private dental services and the effect of competition. DESIGN: Data on practice characteristics, performance, and perceived competition were collected from full-time private dentists (n = 1,121) using a questionnaire. The response rate was 59.6%. Cluster analysis was used to identify practice type based on service differentiation and process integration variables formulated from the questionnaire. RESULTS: Four strategic groups were identified in the Finnish markets: Solo practices formed one distinct group and group practices were classified into three clusters Integrated practices, Small practices, and Loosely integrated practices. Statistically significant differences were found in performance and perceived competitiveness between the groups. Integrated practices with the highest level of process integration and service differentiation performed better than solo and small practices. Moreover, loosely integrated and small practices outperformed solo practises. Competitive intensity was highest among small practices which had a low level of service differentiation and was above average among solo practises. CONCLUSIONS: Private dental care providers that had differentiated their services from public services and that had a high number of integrated service production processes enjoyed higher performance and less competitive pressures than those who had not.


Subject(s)
Dental Health Services/organization & administration , Health Care Sector/organization & administration , Private Practice/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/classification , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/economics , Economic Competition , Fees, Dental , Financial Management/economics , Financial Management/organization & administration , Finland , Group Practice, Dental/classification , Group Practice, Dental/economics , Group Practice, Dental/organization & administration , Health Care Reform/economics , Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Health Care Sector/economics , Humans , Marketing of Health Services/economics , Marketing of Health Services/organization & administration , Practice Management, Dental/economics , Practice Management, Dental/organization & administration , Private Practice/economics
5.
Community Dent Health ; 29(4): 315-20, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23488216

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Current UK and US economic conditions have re-focussed attention on the need to deliver dental care with limited finance and resources. This raises hard questions determining which services will be offered and what they should achieve to satisfy public demands and needs. We consider impending dental health reforms in the US and UK within the context of contemporary experiences to identify issues and delivery goals for the two nations. BACKGROUND: The paper provides a brief history and background of the development of social dental care models in the UK and US, highlighting some differences in state-funded delivery of dental care. SHIFTING DEMAND: From the 1950s, demand for dental treatment has increased and acquired a more complex composition growing from predominantly surgical and restorative treatment to encompass preventive care and cosmetic services. PRIORITISING CARE ACCORDING TO NEED: Despite improvements in general health and technology, inequalities in access and utilisation of dental care are still experienced, primarily by groups with low socio-economic status. DELIVERY: BALANCING RESOURCES, DEMAND AND NEED: In developing and delivering reform agendas, much can be learned from previous policy interventions. Pressures of cost, coverage, and capacity, besides demand versus need must be carefully considered and balanced to deliver quality service and value for users and taxpayers. CONCLUSIONS: Ethical and moral consideration should be given to making services needs-driven to address high treatment requirements rather than the high care demands of the worried well. This challenge brings the additional political pressure of convincing many of the voters (and subsequent complainers) that their demands may be less important than the needs of others.


Subject(s)
Dental Health Services/economics , Healthcare Financing , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Ethics, Dental , Health Care Costs , Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Health Care Sector , Health Expenditures , Health Policy , Health Priorities , Health Resources , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Insurance, Health/organization & administration , Organizational Objectives , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organization & administration , Preventive Dentistry/organization & administration , Primary Health Care , Private Sector , Quality of Health Care , Social Class , State Dentistry/organization & administration , United Kingdom , United States
6.
Cad Saude Publica ; 25(9): 1894-906, 2009 Sep.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19750377

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of regular use of dental services by adults and identify groups where this behavior is more frequent. A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out in Pelotas, southern Brazil, including 2,961 individuals who answered a standardized questionnaire. Overall prevalence of regular use of dental services was 32.8%. The following variables were positively associated with regular use: female gender, age >or= 60 years, no partner, high educational level, high economic status, private service user, good/excellent self-rated oral health, and no perceived need for dental treatment. Those who had received orientation on prevention and expressed a favorable view towards the dentist had higher odds of being regular users. Especially among lower-income individuals, regular use was infrequent (15%). When restricting the analysis to users of public dental services, schooling was still positively associated with the outcome. Dental services, especially in the public sector, should develop strategies to increase regular and preventive use.


Subject(s)
Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Brazil , Dental Health Services/classification , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Diseases/prevention & control , Multivariate Analysis , Oral Health , Private Sector , Public Sector , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
7.
Cad. saúde pública ; 25(9): 1894-1906, set. 2009. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-524795

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o uso regular de serviços odontológicos entre adultos, identificando grupos nos quais esse comportamento é mais freqüente. O estudo foi realizado em Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, com desenho transversal de base populacional, envolvendo 2.961 indivíduos, que responderam um questionário estruturado. A prevalência de uso regular encontrada foi de 32,8 por cento. Estiveram positivamente associadas ao uso de forma regular as seguintes características: ser do sexo feminino, ter idade < 60 anos, não ter companheiro, ter alta escolaridade, ter maior nível econômico, usar serviços privados, ter autopercepção de saúde bucal boa/ótima, não ter autopercepção de necessidade de tratamento, ter recebido orientação sobre prevenção e ter manifestado opinião favorável ao profissional. O uso regular foi pouco freqüente, especialmente entre os menos favorecidos (15 por cento). Restringindo a análise apenas para usuários do serviço público, observou-se maior utilização regular entre os mais escolarizados. Os serviços de saúde, em especial o público, devem trabalhar a fim de incrementar o uso regular e preventivo.


The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of regular use of dental services by adults and identify groups where this behavior is more frequent. A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out in Pelotas, southern Brazil, including 2,961 individuals who answered a standardized questionnaire. Overall prevalence of regular use of dental services was 32.8 percent. The following variables were positively associated with regular use: female gender, age > 60 years, no partner, high educational level, high economic status, private service user, good/excellent self-rated oral health, and no perceived need for dental treatment. Those who had received orientation on prevention and expressed a favorable view towards the dentist had higher odds of being regular users. Especially among lower-income individuals, regular use was infrequent (15 percent). When restricting the analysis to users of public dental services, schooling was still positively associated with the outcome. Dental services, especially in the public sector, should develop strategies to increase regular and preventive use.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Dental Health Services , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Dental Health Services/classification , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Multivariate Analysis , Mouth Diseases/prevention & control , Oral Health , Private Sector , Public Sector , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
8.
Dent Clin North Am ; 52(2): 297-318, vi, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18329445

ABSTRACT

Oral health disparities refers to the existence of differences in the incidence, prevalence, mortality, and burden of oral diseases and other adverse health conditions, as well as the use of health care services, among specific population groups in the United States. Existence of disparities in oral health status, accessing and using the oral health care delivery system, and receiving treatment depending on gender, race or ethnicity, education, income, disability, geographic location, and sexual orientation have been documented. Different states have initiated a series of steps as tools to document, assess, develop strategies, and monitor progress in efforts to eliminate or reduce oral health disparities in the United States.


Subject(s)
Dental Care , Healthcare Disparities , Oral Health , Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/supply & distribution , Health Services Accessibility , Health Status , Healthcare Disparities/classification , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mouth Diseases/therapy , Tooth Diseases/therapy , United States
9.
J Public Health Dent ; 66(1): 67-71, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16570754

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize dental service utilization in 1997 by community dwelling Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, or MCBS, is a continuous annual series of nationally representative surveys of Medicare beneficiaries. Univariate comparisons were made between dependent variables (dental utilization and types of dental services) by each of the independent variables (age group, gender, race, income, education, population density, marital status and U.S. Census Bureau regions using weighted proportions to test for independence between dependent and independent variables. RESULTS: Overall, an estimated 41% of the population had a dental visit. Although utilization declined with aging, 24% of those 85 and older visited a dentist. CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive study provides important information about dental utilization and services in the American elderly population. Younger, high income, white or educated elderly Americans had higher dental utilization.


Subject(s)
Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Dental Care/classification , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Dentistry, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Income , Male , Marital Status , Medicare , Oral Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups , Sex Factors , United States , Urban Population , White People/statistics & numerical data
11.
Inform Prim Care ; 13(1): 23-34, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15949172

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a framework for implementing fuzzy classifications in primary dental care services. Dental practices aim to provide the highest quality services for their patients. To achieve this, it is important that dentists are able to obtain patients' opinions about their experiences in the dental practice and are able to accurately evaluate this. We propose the use of fuzzy classification to combine various assessment criteria into one general measure to assess patients' satisfaction with primary dental care services. The proposed framework can be used in conventional dental practice information systems and easily integrated with those already used. The benefits of using the proposed fuzzy classification approach include more flexible and accurate analysis of patients' feedback, combining verbal and numeric data. To confirm our theory, a prototype was developed based on the Microsoft SQL Server database management system for two criteria used in dental practices, namely making an appointment with a dentist and waiting time for dental care services.


Subject(s)
Database Management Systems , Dental Health Services/classification , Fuzzy Logic , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Primary Health Care
12.
J Dent Educ ; 66(6): 739-46, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12117096

ABSTRACT

In 1999, HRSA contracted with the UCLA School of Dentistry to evaluate the postgraduate general dentistry (PDG) training programs. The purpose of this article is to compare the program characteristics of the PGD training programs sponsored by the Armed Services (military) and VA. Surveys mailed to sixty-six VA and forty-two military program directors in fall 2000 sought information regarding the infrastructure of the program, the program emphasis, resident preparation prior to entering the program, and a description of patients served and types of services provided. Of the eighty-one returned surveys (75 percent response rate), thirty were received from military program directors and fifty-one were received from VA program directors. AEGDs reported treating a higher proportion of children patients and GPRs more medically intensive, disadvantaged and HIV/AIDS patients. Over half of the directors reported increases in curriculum emphasis in implantology. The program directors reported a high level of inadequate preparation among incoming dental residents. Having a higher ratio of residents to total number of faculty predicted inadequate preparation (p=.022) although the model was weak. Although HRSA doesn't financially support federally sponsored programs, their goal of improved dental training to care for medically compromised individuals is facilitated through these programs, thus making military and VA general dentistry programs a national resource.


Subject(s)
Education, Dental, Graduate , General Practice, Dental/education , Military Dentistry/education , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Comprehensive Dental Care , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Curriculum , Dental Care for Children , Dental Care for Chronically Ill , Dental Care for Disabled , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/organization & administration , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Service, Hospital , Education, Dental, Graduate/organization & administration , Emergency Medical Services , Faculty, Dental , General Practice, Dental/organization & administration , HIV Infections , Health Resources , Humans , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Logistic Models , Military Dentistry/organization & administration , Program Evaluation , Statistics as Topic , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Health Resources and Services Administration
13.
J Dent Educ ; 66(6): 757-65, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12117098

ABSTRACT

U.S. civilian (non-VA/non-military) Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) and General Practice Residency (GPR) programs were identified (n=208) and surveyed. The assessment evaluated infrastructure support, populations served, services provided, and trainee stipends. One hundred thirty-one programs responded (thirty-two AEGD, 64 percent/ninety-nine GPR, 63 percent). Sixty-nine programs were HRSA-funded (53 percent), and sixty-three (47 percent) were nonfunded. One hundred and five responses identified hospital/medical center resources; fifty-six indicated dental school support. Mean faculty support was similar regardless of program type or HRSA funding. Mean first-year positions in AEGDs were greater than GPRs. Mean first-year GPR positions were greater in funded than in nonfunded programs. A comparison of AEGD and GPR programs showed that residents in GPRs treated more children, medically intensive, economically/socially disadvantaged, and in-patient/same-day surgery patients (p<0.05). Residents in AEGDs treated more healthy adults (p<0.05). GPRs treated more lower fee (no pay, Medicaid, welfare/general relief, Medicare, and capitation/HMO) patients. AEGDs treated more insurance/private pay patients (p=.0001). No differences existed in comprehensive care and emergency visits between AEGDs and GPRs. GPRs treated more hospital-based patients. The mean stipends for GPRs ($32,055) and AEGDs ($22,403) were different.


Subject(s)
Education, Dental, Graduate , General Practice, Dental/education , Adult , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Dental Care for Children , Dental Care for Chronically Ill , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Service, Hospital , Education, Dental, Graduate/economics , Faculty, Dental , Financing, Government , General Practice, Dental/economics , Health Resources , Hospitalization , Humans , Insurance, Dental , Internship and Residency/economics , Medical Assistance , Schools, Dental , Social Class , Statistics, Nonparametric , Training Support , Uncompensated Care , United States , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/economics
14.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 133(2): 167-75, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11868835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While many studies have provided data on Americans' access to dental care, few have provided a detailed understanding of what specific treatments patients receive. This article provides detailed information about the types of dental services that Americans receive and the types of providers who render them. METHODS: The authors provide national estimates for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population in several socioeconomic and demographic categories regarding dental visits, procedures performed and the types of providers who performed them, using household data from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, or MEPS. RESULTS: Data show that while the combination of diagnostic and preventive services adds up to 65 percent of all dental procedures, the combination of periodontal and endodontic procedures represents only 3 percent. Additionally, while 81 percent of all dental visits were reported as visits to general dentists, approximately 7 percent and 5 percent of respondents who had had a dental visit reported having visited orthodontists or oral surgeons, respectively. CONCLUSION: MEPS data show the magnitude and nature of dental visits in aggregate and for each of several demographic and socioeconomic categories. This information establishes a nationally representative baseline for the U.S. population in terms of rates of utilization, number and types of procedures and variations in types of providers performing the procedures. These nationally representative estimates include data elements that describe specific dental visits, dental procedures and type of provider, and they offer details that are useful, important and not found elsewhere. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: By understanding these analyses, U.S. dentists will be better positioned to provide care and better meet the dental care needs of all Americans.


Subject(s)
Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Dental Care/classification , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Dental Prosthesis/classification , Dental Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Dental Restoration, Permanent/classification , Dental Restoration, Permanent/statistics & numerical data , Diagnosis, Oral/classification , Diagnosis, Oral/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Female , General Practice, Dental/classification , General Practice, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/classification , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/classification , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oral Surgical Procedures/classification , Oral Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Orthodontics/classification , Orthodontics/statistics & numerical data , Periodontics/classification , Periodontics/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Dentistry/classification , Preventive Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , Root Canal Therapy/classification , Root Canal Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Social Class , Statistics as Topic , United States , White People/statistics & numerical data
15.
J Oral Rehabil ; 29(3): 240-4, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11896840

ABSTRACT

A random probability sample of 2667 United Kingdom (UK) addresses was selected in a multistage sampling process. Participants were interviewed about their oral health status--number of teeth possessed and denture status. In addition information was collected about their socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, social class and income level) and dental service factors--type of service used and difficulty accessing national health service (NHS) care. The response rate was 70%. Six percent (107) claimed they had less than 20 teeth but did not use a denture. Variations in this practice were apparent in relation to a number of socio-demographic factors: age (P < 0.05), gender (P < 0.01) and social class (P < 0.001) but not service related factors. In regression analysis, social class, gender and age emerged as important predictors of this practice. For example, those from lower social classes were approximately half as likely to use dentures despite experiencing considerable tooth loss (OR=0.53, 95% CI 0.34, 0.83), having controlling for other factors. More than one in 20, in Britain claim they have experienced considerable tooth loss but are without resource to a denture. Socio-demographic factors rather than service related factors are associated with this practice, particularly social class.


Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis , Tooth Loss/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Attitude to Health , Chi-Square Distribution , Confidence Intervals , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Dental Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Dentures , Female , Forecasting , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Income , Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/classification , Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/rehabilitation , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Private Practice , Sex Factors , Social Class , State Dentistry , Tooth Loss/classification , United Kingdom
16.
Community Dent Health ; 16(2): 85-92, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10641062

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To validate a model framework comparing resources required for activities in the Community Dental Service. The framework consisted of five levels of care of increasing complexity for six groups of patients. The patient groups were: children with behavioural problems, mentally disabled patients, anxious adults, paedodontic patients, medically compromised and physically disabled patients. DESIGN: Delphi study using two sequential questionnaires. Participants were asked to rate the difficulty of 29 different treatments on a scale from 1 to 100. PARTICIPANTS: Six clinical directors and eleven senior dental officers working in the Community Dental Service in the North West of England. RESULTS: Seventeen of the 29 treatments were rated at the level of care predicted by the model. Nine were rated lower and three higher. Within the patient groups the order of increasing complexity, predicted by the model, was verified with only one exception. CONCLUSIONS: The research confirmed that it is possible to measure CDS activity in a rational way. Consensus was reached on a suitable framework which was simpler than the original model in having only four levels of care. The use of the modified model is now being tested in the Community Dental Service.


Subject(s)
Community Dentistry , Delphi Technique , Dental Health Services , Health Resources , Models, Organizational , Adult , Child , Community Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , United Kingdom
17.
Br Dent J ; 185(1): 30-2, 1998 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9701870

ABSTRACT

Many British dentists consider that because of the NHS, oral healthcare provision in Europe is more comprehensive, less controlled and more remunerative than the UK, a view that is often shared by their European colleagues. In this article, the oral healthcare systems of most European countries are classified and compared, and some strengths, similarities and weaknesses are identified and discussed.


Subject(s)
Dental Health Services , State Medicine , Comprehensive Dental Care/economics , Comprehensive Dental Care/organization & administration , Dental Health Services/classification , Dental Health Services/economics , Dental Health Services/organization & administration , Europe , European Union , Financing, Government/economics , Financing, Government/organization & administration , Forecasting , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Income , Insurance, Health/classification , Insurance, Health/economics , Social Security/economics , Social Security/organization & administration , State Medicine/economics , State Medicine/organization & administration , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...