Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.986
Filter
1.
J Vis Exp ; (207)2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829116

ABSTRACT

Dental implants have a high success and survival rate. However, complications such as peri-implantitis (PI) are highly challenging to treat. PI is characterized by inflammation in the tissues around dental implants with progressive loss of supporting bone. To optimize dental implants' longevity in terms of health and functionality, it is crucial to understand the peri-implantitis pathophysiology. In this regard, using mouse models in research has proven clear benefits in recreating clinical circumstances. This study aimed to describe an experimental model of ligature-induced peri-implantitis in mice and determine whether there is effectiveness in inducing this disease, given the observed bone and tissue changes. The experimental peri-implantitis induction comprehends the following steps: teeth extraction, implant placement, and ligature-inducted PI. A sample of eighteen 3-week-old C57BL/6J male mice was divided into two groups, ligature (N=9) and control non-ligature (N=9). The evaluation of clinical, radiographical, and histological factors was performed. The ligature group showed significantly higher bone loss, increased soft tissue edema, and apical epithelial migration than the non-ligature group. It was concluded that this pre-clinical model can successfully induce peri-implantitis in mice.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Peri-Implantitis , Animals , Mice , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Peri-Implantitis/pathology , Male , Ligation/methods , Dental Implants/adverse effects
2.
Swiss Dent J ; 134(3)2024 Jun 07.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847057

ABSTRACT

Mit der Verbreitung von Zahnimplantaten ist die Zahl neurologischer Komplikationen gestiegen, wobei diese vor allem im Unterkiefer vorkommen. Verletzungen des Nervus alveo- laris inferior sind eine ernste Komplikation mit Inzidenzen für transiente Nervschäden bis zu 24% und persistierenden Schädigungen bis zu 11%.


Subject(s)
Trigeminal Nerve Injuries , Humans , Trigeminal Nerve Injuries/etiology , Emergencies , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Dental Implantation/adverse effects
3.
Int J Implant Dent ; 10(1): 22, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700739

ABSTRACT

The aim of the presented retrospective study was to evaluate the early crestal bone changes around an implant type designed for high primary stability. A total number of 111 implants placed clinically were evaluated regarding insertion torque, bone density, implant stability quotient (ISQ) and early crestal bone loss from standardized digital radiographs. The implants were allocated in two groups: the "regular torque " group contained all implants that achieved less than 50 Ncm as final insertion torque (n = 63) and the "high torque" group contained the implants that achieved 50-80 Ncm (n = 48). To avoid possible damage either to the implant´s inner connection or to the bone by application of excessive force, a limit of 80 Ncm was set for all surgeries. All implants underwent submerged healing for three months. ISQ measurements and standardized digital radiographs were taken at day of insertion and at day of second stage surgery. The bone loss was measured on the mesial and distal aspect of the implant. The data evaluation showed the following results: Mean bone loss was 0.27 ± 0.30 mm for the high torque group and 0.24 ± 0.27 mm for the regular torque group. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.552). In the two groups, no complications nor implant loss occurred. For the evaluated implant type, there was no significant difference in crestal bone changes and complication rate between high and regular insertion torque in the early healing period.


Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Implants , Torque , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Bone Density , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Adult
4.
Discov Med ; 36(184): 874-881, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38798248

ABSTRACT

The number of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients requiring renal replacement therapy is increasing, often exhibiting oral manifestations including periodontal disease, gingival hyperplasia, altered saliva composition, and uremic stomatitis. Uremic stomatitis, xerostomia, and candidiasis are very frequent, particularly among patients undergoing dialysis or kidney transplant recipients. CKD patients also experience profound alterations in bone metabolism inherent in the homeostasis of calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF). These alterations lead to demineralization of the jaw bones, reduced bone trabeculae, reduced cortical bone thickness, fibrocystic bone lesions, bone fractures, and delayed wound healing post-tooth extraction. Consequently, oral health management of elderly hemodialysis patients poses serious clinical problems. This review focused on the oral health and rehabilitation of patients with CKD or on dialysis.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Oral Health , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Oral Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects
5.
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) ; 17(2): 137-161, 2024 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801329

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To provide an overview of the outcomes of the use of autogenous platelet concentrates in immediate implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on an a priori protocol, a systematic search was performed of the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE via PubMed), Embase and Scopus databases. Randomised and non-randomised controlled clinical trials on immediate implant placement including at least one study arm with use of platelet-rich fibrin or platelet-rich plasma as a gap filler between immediately placed implants and the alveolar bone were included. A random-effects meta-analysis model was built to assess the primary outcomes of marginal bone loss and probing pocket depths between test (platelet concentrates) and control (no graft or other graft materials) groups. A risk of bias assessment was performed and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 20 trials (595 immediate implants placed in 454 individuals) were included in the meta-analytic model. Based on the data from studies with a minimum post-prosthetic loading period of 6 months after immediate implant placement, overall, the application of platelet concentrates was associated with significantly lower marginal bone loss and probing pocket depth compared to the control groups (mean difference -0.36 mm; P < 0.01 and mean difference -0.47 mm; P < 0.01, respectively). No additional benefit of application of platelet concentrates was detected regarding primary stability of immediate implants. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly lower marginal bone loss with xenogeneic bone alone compared to platelet concentrates alone as grafting material in immediate implant placement (mean difference 0.66 mm; P < 0.01). Evidence on soft tissue outcomes and aesthetic parameters was scarce. CONCLUSIONS: A low level of certainty based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach indicates superior outcomes in terms of marginal bone loss and probing pocket depth in immediate implant placement with the use of platelet concentrates versus no graft. Future research should be tailored towards a standardised protocol for preparation of platelet concentrates and inclusion of soft tissue and aesthetic outcomes as well.


Subject(s)
Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Humans , Immediate Dental Implant Loading/methods , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Alveolar Bone Loss , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
6.
Braz Oral Res ; 38: e040, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747827

ABSTRACT

Peri-implant diseases, including peri-implant mucositis (PIM) and peri-implantitis, are a chronic inflammatory disorder triggered by bacterial biofilm in susceptible hosts. Potential risk factors for peri-implant diseases include smoking, dental plaque accumulation, poor oral hygiene, genetics, and absence of peri-implant keratinized mucosa. This cohort study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient-, implant-, and prosthetic-related factors on PIM and peri-implant bone loss (PBL) around dental implants after 1 year of loading. A total of 54 subjects (22 males and 32 females) were included in the study. Peri-implant clinical parameters were assessed and standardized periapical radiographs of each dental implant were obtained 15 days after the definitive prosthesis installation (baseline) and at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. A total of 173 implants were evaluated. PIM affected 44.8% of the implants and no significant association was found between the investigated parameters and PIM incidence, except for type of implant connection. A significantly higher incidence of PIM (80.0%) was observed for implants with internal hexagon connection type after 1 year of follow-up (p = 0.015). Moreover, a mean PBL of 0.35 ± 1.89 mm was observed and no dental implant was affected by peri-implantitis after 1 year of function. No specific influence of patient, implant, or prosthetic factors on PBL was observed. No association was found between the occurrence of PIM/PBL and the patient-, implant-, and prosthetic-related factors investigated in this cohort study, except for the type of dental-implant connection.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Stomatitis , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Alveolar Bone Loss/etiology , Adult , Risk Factors , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Stomatitis/etiology , Time Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Young Adult
7.
Br Dent J ; 236(10): 759-763, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789752

ABSTRACT

This article forms part of the themed issue on dental implants, with the general dentist being the main intended reader and with particular relevance to primary care dental professionals. It aims to describe the various characteristics of the implant in health, address contemporary developments in implant dentistry and offer some novel insights on the prevention of peri-implant diseases. A healthy implant exhibits specific histological, clinical and radiographic characteristics. Understanding such aspects leads to proper diagnosis and measures to maintain tissue integrity and prevent the development and progression of peri-implant diseases. Moreover, internationally and widely accepted definitions and recommendations based on expert consensus have been put forward to guide day-to-day clinical practice. This information should provide general practitioners with the means necessary to achieve the best possible outcome for their patients.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Humans , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Peri-Implantitis/diagnostic imaging , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control , Peri-Implantitis/diagnosis , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods
8.
Br Dent J ; 236(10): 765-771, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789753

ABSTRACT

Current research has identified features of the prosthetic design with potential to significantly impact the long-term health of peri-implant tissues, while the choice of prosthetic components is also shown to be critical in an effort to reduce long-term complications of implant therapy. Overcontouring of the prosthesis emergence profile has been associated with marginal bone loss, recession and peri-implantitis, while the mucosal emergence angle is shown to have a strong association with peri-implant tissue inflammation. Further elements of interest include convexity/concavity of the restoration, the prosthetic connection and the different geometric configurations of junctions, as well as the peri-implant tissue dimensions. With regards to implant components, the choice between original and third-party-manufactured components might come with implications, as differences in material and microgeometry might impact precision of fit and overall performance, potentially leading to complications. Scrutiny of the specifications and manufacturing is essential when third-party-manufactured components are considered.The aim of this narrative review was to summarise the current evidence with regards to the restorative features of the implant prosthesis and also the selection of prosthetic components which can have implications for the long-term success of the implant therapy. Furthermore, the review aimed at interpretating current scientific evidence into meaningful strategies and recommendations to implement in clinical practice of implant dentistry.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Prosthesis Design , Humans , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control
9.
Br Dent J ; 236(10): 753-757, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789751

ABSTRACT

The use of implants to replace missing teeth is now commonplace and practised by clinicians worldwide in both general and specialist practice. There is an abundance of evidence on the general success of implant treatment. As well as reviewing the history of dental implants, this narrative review will discuss the merits and successful placement of tissue-level verses bone-level implants. Furthermore, the article will evaluate the concept and benefits of platform switching for implant treatment. Finally, with the increased placement of implants, this narrative paper will review how different titanium surfaces impact on the risk of peri-implantitis.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Humans , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Prosthesis Design , Titanium
10.
Br Dent J ; 236(10): 797-801, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789757

ABSTRACT

Peri-implant mucositis is characterised by inflammation of soft tissues surrounding a dental implant without associated bone loss beyond initial remodelling. Early detection and timely intervention are critical to prevent its progression to peri-implantitis. This paper focuses on various treatment options for treating peri-implant mucositis. The cornerstone of professional treatment lies in the mechanical disruption and removal of microbial biofilms around the implant. This can be achieved through careful use of manual or powered instruments, such as ultrasonic scalers or air polishing devices. However, there is a need for further research to determine the most effective single approach for treating peri-implant mucositis. Current evidence does not support the combination of mechanical debridement with locally administered antibiotics. Contrarily, evidence strongly supports the removal, cleaning, and modifications of prostheses to improve both self-performance and professional cleanability. The use of adjunctive therapies like photodynamic therapy and diode laser, in conjunction with mechanical instrumentation, is not currently recommended due to the limited strength of available evidence. Preventive measures emphasise the importance of comprehensive oral hygiene care, encompassing professional guidance and at-home practices, to manage biofilms effectively. This encompasses oral hygiene instruction, regular debridement, and maintenance care. Supporting peri-implant therapy is also vital for ongoing implant monitoring, preventing the recurrence of mucositis, and halting its progression to peri-implantitis. This multifaceted approach is key to effectively managing and treating peri-implant mucositis.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Stomatitis , Humans , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Peri-Implantitis/therapy , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control , Stomatitis/therapy , Stomatitis/prevention & control , Stomatitis/etiology , Clinical Decision-Making , Oral Hygiene/methods , Debridement/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
11.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10717, 2024 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730018

ABSTRACT

In reconstructive surgery, complications post-fibula free flap (FFF) reconstruction, notably peri-implant hyperplasia, are significant yet understudied. This study analyzed peri-implant hyperplastic tissue surrounding FFF, alongside peri-implantitis and foreign body granulation (FBG) tissues from patients treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Using light microscopy, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, anucleate and pyknotic prickle cells, and excessive collagen deposition were observed in FFF hyperplastic tissue. Ultrastructural analyses revealed abnormal structures, including hemidesmosome dilation, bacterial invasion, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) swelling. In immunohistochemical analysis, unfolded protein-response markers ATF6, PERK, XBP1, inflammatory marker NFκB, necroptosis marker MLKL, apoptosis marker GADD153, autophagy marker LC3, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis markers were expressed variably in hyperplastic tissue surrounding FFF implants, peri-implantitis, and FBG tissues. NFκB expression was higher in peri-implantitis and FBG tissues compared to hyperplastic tissue surrounding FFF implants. PERK expression exceeded XBP1 significantly in FFF hyperplastic tissue, while expression levels of PERK, XBP1, and ATF6 were not significantly different in peri-implantitis and FBG tissues. These findings provide valuable insights into the interconnected roles of ER stress, necroptosis, apoptosis, and angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of oral pathologies, offering a foundation for innovative strategies in dental implant rehabilitation management and prevention.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Hyperplasia , Humans , Female , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Hyperplasia/pathology , Hyperplasia/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Immunohistochemistry , Peri-Implantitis/metabolism , Peri-Implantitis/pathology , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Fibula/pathology , Fibula/metabolism
12.
J Trace Elem Med Biol ; 84: 127464, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703537

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Titanium is considered to be an inert material owing to the ability of the material to form a passive titanium oxide layer. However, once the titanium oxide layer is lost, it can lead to exposure of the underlying titanium substructure and can undergo corrosion. SUMMARY: The article explores the role of titanium ions and particles from dental implants on cells, cytokine release, and on the systemic redistribution of these particles as well as theories proposed to elucidate the effects of these particles on peri-implant inflammation based on evidence from in-vitro, human, and animal studies. Titanium particles and ions have a pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic effect on cells and promote the release of pro-inflammatory mediators like cytokines. Three theories to explain etiopathogenesis have been proposed, one based on microbial dysbiosis, the second based on titanium particles and ions and the third based on a synergistic effect between microbiome and titanium particles on the host. CONCLUSION: There is clear evidence from in-vitro and limited human and animal studies that titanium particles released from dental implants have a detrimental effect on cells directly and through the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Future clinical and translational studies are required to clarify the role of titanium particles and ions in peri-implant inflammation and the etiopathogenesis of peri-implantitis.


Subject(s)
Cytokines , Dental Implants , Titanium , Humans , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Titanium/chemistry , Titanium/adverse effects , Cytokines/metabolism , Corrosion , Animals
13.
Br Dent J ; 236(10): 781-789, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789755

ABSTRACT

The long-term maintenance or restoration of peri-implant tissues' health depends on the strategic implementation of preventive measures and interventions. These measures should be initiated before implant placement and continued throughout a patient's lifetime, as part of a tailored and comprehensive supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) programme. Central to the clinical efforts of maintaining and rehabilitating peri-implant tissues are several key factors, including the ongoing assessment and frequent monitoring of tissue health and stability, proactive oral health promotion, the control of risk factors and indicators and the provision of professional plaque biofilm removal. It is of paramount importance to underline that SPIC should not limit its scope exclusively to patients already in a state of peri-implant health; in fact, it is imperative that it should extend its protective effect to individuals who have been previously diagnosed and treated for peri-implant diseases, focusing on preventing its recurrence and progression, thereby avoiding further complications, such as implant loss.This narrative review presents an overview of the current literature on the maintenance of peri-implant tissues' health and the steps of SPIC providing insights into the critical factors to be considered when managing dental implant patients in the general dental practice.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Humans , Dental Implants/adverse effects , General Practice, Dental , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Oral Health , Risk Factors
14.
Br Dent J ; 236(10): 803-808, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789758

ABSTRACT

As utilisation of dental implants continues to rise, so does the incidence of biological complications. When peri-implantitis has already caused extensive bone resorption, the dentist faces the dilemma of which therapy is the most appropriate to maintain the implant. Since non-surgical approaches of peri-implantitis have shown limited effectiveness, the present paper describes different surgical treatment modalities, underlining their indications and limitations. The primary goal in the management of peri-implantitis is to decontaminate the surface of the infected implant and to eliminate deep peri-implant pockets. For this purpose, access flap debridement, with or without resective procedures, has shown to be effective in a large number of cases. These surgical treatments, however, may be linked to post-operative recession of the mucosal margin. In addition to disease resolution, reconstructive approaches also seek to regenerate the bone defect and to achieve re-osseointegration.


Subject(s)
Peri-Implantitis , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/surgery , Peri-Implantitis/therapy , Surgical Flaps , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Debridement/methods
15.
Br Dent J ; 236(10): 791-794, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789756

ABSTRACT

Peri-implant diseases are frequent complications that occur around osseointegrated endosseous implants and are the result of an imbalance between the bacterial challenge and host response. Peri-implant diseases may affect the peri-implant mucosa only (peri-implant mucositis) or also involve the supporting bone (peri-implantitis). Early detection of peri-implant diseases and timely treatment is important for the success of dental implant treatment. Peri-implant probing is essential to assess the peri-implant health status and should be done at each recall visit. Dental practitioners should be familiar with the clinical and radiological features of both conditions in order to make an accurate diagnosis and determine the appropriate treatment required. This article aims to provide clinicians with an understanding of the key differences between peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Stomatitis , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Peri-Implantitis/diagnosis , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/diagnosis , Mucositis/etiology , Mucositis/diagnosis
17.
Br Dent J ; 236(7): 507, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609594
18.
Br Dent J ; 236(7): 563, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609626
19.
Br Dent J ; 236(7): 568, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609637
20.
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue ; 33(1): 76-79, 2024 Feb.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583029

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of orthodontic treatment combined with bone level implant in repairing dentition defect. METHODS: The data of 88 patients with single dental implant in mandibular posterior region who were treated for dentition defect from January 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 44 patients with bone level implant repair(control group) and 44 patients with orthodontic treatment combined bone level implant repair (experimental group). The success rate of implant implantation, periodontal health status, masticatory function, implant stability, postoperative complications and implant satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 18.0 software package. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the success rate of implant implantation at 3 months and 6 months between the two groups(P>0.05). The success rate of implant implantation at 12 months in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The gingival sulci bleeding index (SBI) and probing depth (PD) of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group at 12 months after implantation (P<0.05), and there was no significant different in bone absorption between the two groups at 12 months after implantation(P>0.05). The EMG activities of masseter muscle and temporal muscle in the two groups were significantly higher than those before treatment(P<0.05), and those of masseter muscle and temporal muscle in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The implant stability coefficient values of 6 months and 12 months in 2 groups were significantly higher than those of 3 months (P<0.05), the implant stability coefficient values of 12 months in 2 groups were significantly higher than those of 6 months and 12 months in 2 groups (P<0.05), and the implant stability coefficient values of 6 months and 12 months in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The implant satisfaction of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic treatment combined with bone level implants can improve the success rate of implantation and masticatory efficiency, enhance the periodontal health of implants, and increase the patients' satisfaction with implants.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Humans , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Dentition , Retrospective Studies , Dental Implantation, Endosseous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...