Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Calif Dent Assoc ; 43(5): 245-9, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26798899

ABSTRACT

Electronic health record (EHR) solutions provide many potential benefits for dental practices, whether those programs run internally on a dental practice's computers or are cloud-based solutions. However, these programs also create new risks for a dental practice, which may be mitigated through due diligence and adequate contractual provisions to ensure protection for dentists. This article addresses the legal considerations associated with a dentist entering into a service contract with an EHR vendor.


Subject(s)
Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Electronic Health Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Practice Management, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , California , Computer Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer User Training/legislation & jurisprudence , Contract Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Informatics/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Risk Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Software/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
3.
Int J Comput Dent ; 13(3): 233-50, 2010.
Article in English, German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20879462

ABSTRACT

Treatment data from practices and specialization centers, especially in the increasingly specialized areas which university clinics do not cover, are very important for evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of dental examination and treatment methods. In the case of paper-based documentation, the evaluation of these data usually fails because of the cost it entails. With the use of electronic medical records, this expense can be markedly lower, provided the data acquisition and storage is structured accordingly. Since access to sensitive person-related data is simplified considerably by this method, such health data are protected, especially on the European level. Other than generally assumed, this protection is not restricted solely to the confidentiality principle, but also comprises the power of disposition over the data (data protection). The result is that from a legal point of view, the treatment data cannot be readily used for scientific studies, not even by dentists and physicians who have collected the data legally during the course of their therapeutic work. The technical separation of treatment data from the personal data offers a legally acceptable solution to this problem. It must ensure that a later assignment to individual persons will not be feasible at a realistic expense ("effective anonymization"). This article describes the legal and information technology principles and their practical implementation, as illustrated by the concept of a respective compliant IT architecture for the dentaConcept CMD fact diagnostic software. Here, a special export function automatically separates the anonymized treatment data and thus facilitates multicentric studies within an institution and among dental practices.


Subject(s)
Data Collection , Dental Informatics/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer Security , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Databases, Factual/legislation & jurisprudence , Documentation , Electronic Health Records/legislation & jurisprudence , European Union , Germany , Humans , Information Storage and Retrieval/methods , Software Design
4.
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am ; 20(1): 37-46, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18194736

ABSTRACT

Whether new to private practice or a seasoned practitioner, an oral and maxillofacial surgeon (OMS) needs to understand how to handle complicated and often stressful negotiations of contracts for which he or she usually is untrained. This article is designed to give a general understanding of certain common contractual language. It is not comprehensive in scope, but it attempts to cover contracts that are most often seen by an OMS in practice. It is a general discussion of common legal concepts that could face an OMS, but it is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.


Subject(s)
Contracts/legislation & jurisprudence , Practice Management, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Surgery, Oral/legislation & jurisprudence , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Correspondence as Topic , Dental Informatics/legislation & jurisprudence , Employment/legislation & jurisprudence , Financial Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Insurance, Liability/legislation & jurisprudence , Intellectual Property , Interprofessional Relations , Ownership/legislation & jurisprudence , Personnel Turnover/legislation & jurisprudence , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/legislation & jurisprudence , Software/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...