Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lasers Med Sci ; 33(6): 1237-1244, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29455306

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare dentinal tubule sealing effects of a 532-nm diode-pumped solid-state (DPSS) laser, gallic acid/Fe3+ complex, and three commercially available dentin desensitizers. Human premolars (n = 44) extracted for orthodontics had standardized cervical cavities prepared, etched (37% phosphoric acid) and randomly assigned to either a control (n = 4), or one of five treatment groups (n = 8/group). Desensitizing treatments were either a 532-nm DPSS laser, gallic acid/Fe3+ complex, oxalate-based Super Seal™ (SS), DIO™ Enamel Coating Pen Pro Tooth (Dio), or adhesive-type Hybrid Coat™ (HC). Dentinal fluid flow (DFF) was monitored continuously in real time during the application of each desensitizing agent, by using a nanoliter-scaled fluid flow-measuring device. Following treatment, morphological changes on dentinal surfaces and within tubules were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). DFF rates were significantly reduced after treatment in all experimental groups (P < 0.05), except SS (P > 0.05). The gallic acid/Fe3+ complex reduced DFF rates the most, and significantly (P < 0.05) more than the three commercial dentin desensitizers. There were no significant differences in DFF reduction rates between the gallic acid/Fe3+ complex and the DPSS laser groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in DFF reduction rates among the three commercial dentin desensitizers (P > 0.05). SEM examination of treated dentin showed that the degree of occlusion of dentinal tubules correlated closely with the corresponding reduction in DFF rates. The gallic acid/Fe3+ complex and 532-nm DPSS laser were superior to other desensitizing methods in occluding dentinal tubules and reducing DFF rates.


Subject(s)
Dentin Desensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Dentin Sensitivity/drug therapy , Gallic Acid/chemistry , Iron/chemistry , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Dentin/drug effects , Dentin/ultrastructure , Dentin Desensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Dentinal Fluid/drug effects , Dentinal Fluid/radiation effects , Humans
2.
Am J Dent ; 28(5): 303-8, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26714349

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of lasers (Nd:YAG and Er:YAG) and of topical desensitizing agents on dentin tubule occlusion by measuring real-time dentin fluid flow (DFF). METHODS: 32 molars were prepared with V-shape cavity at the cervical area, acid-etched, water rinsed, blotted dry, and treated with (1) Nd:YAG laser; (2) Er:YAG laser; (3) SuperSeal, a desensitizing agent; (4) ClinproXT, a resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) varnish (n = 8 each). A real-time fluid flow measuring instrument (nano-Flow) was used to measure the DFF throughout the procedures. The DFF rates before and after the treatment were compared. Moreover, the surface topography of dentin tubules after each desensitizing method was examined using SEM. RESULTS: DFF varied among the groups. The DFF rate was significantly reduced after laser irradiation/application of the desensitizing agents (P < 0.05). ClinproXT showed the greatest reduction of DFF rate (71.9%), followed by the SuperSeal (34.8%) and laser groups (P< 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the Nd:YAG (24.1%) and Er:YAG (20.6%) groups (P > 0.05). In SEM images, narrowed dentin tubules were observed in both lased groups and SuperSeal group. In the ClinproXT group, the occluded dentin tubules by the RMGI covering were observed.


Subject(s)
Dentin Desensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Dentin/ultrastructure , Dentinal Fluid/physiology , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Dental Cavity Preparation/classification , Dentin/drug effects , Dentin/radiation effects , Dentin Sensitivity/physiopathology , Dentinal Fluid/drug effects , Dentinal Fluid/radiation effects , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Humans , Hydrodynamics , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Oxalic Acid/therapeutic use , Random Allocation , Resin Cements/chemistry , Tooth Cervix/ultrastructure
3.
J Oral Rehabil ; 34(9): 693-701, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17716269

ABSTRACT

Dentin-bonding agents and resin composite materials typically require light activation for polymerization. Light curing generates heat, which may influence dentinal fluid flow (DFF) and cuspal displacement. This study investigated the relationship among temperature increase, DFF and cuspal displacement in extracted human maxillary premolars with a mesial occlusal distal (MOD) cavity preparation. Two types of curing light were compared. Temperature changes were measured using thermocouples located on the occlusal cavity floor and at the pulp-dentine junction, during polymerization of bonding agent and resin composite material. DFF and cuspal displacement were measured simultaneously using automated flow measurement apparatus and direct current differential transformers respectively. Temperature increases of up to 15 degrees C were recorded during the restoration procedures. A quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) unit produced a significantly greater temperature increase than a light-emitting diode unit and curing of the bonding agent generated less temperature increase than curing of the resin composite. Heating due to exothermic reaction during polymerization of bonding agent and resin was not significantly different between light sources or between bonding and curing (P > 0.05). The QTH unit produced both greater inward fluid flow and cuspal displacement during the irradiation of bonding agent and resin composite than the light-emitting diode unit. There was not a simple relationship between temperature increase, fluid movement and cuspal displacement. From a clinical point of view, the light-emitting diode unit can be considered preferable to the QTH light, because it caused significantly smaller temperature increase, fluid shift and cuspal displacement.


Subject(s)
Bicuspid/surgery , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Dentinal Fluid/physiology , Hot Temperature , Light , Bicuspid/radiation effects , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Dentinal Fluid/radiation effects , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Motion , Temperature
4.
Arch Oral Biol ; 42(12): 845-54, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9460538

ABSTRACT

Dentine specimens were prepared from freshly extracted third molars and initial permeability measured. Each specimen was subjected to Nd:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) (1.06 or 1.32 microns wavelength) or Ho:YAG (2.10 microns wavelength) laser energy while temperatures in the pulp chambers were recorded. Permeability was again measured and the surfaces examined by scanning electron microscopy. Six crown segments were used for each laser variable and eight permeability measurements were taken before and eight after laser exposure, while temperature was recorded during treatment. All wavelengths reduced permeability but temperature rises were high enough to have caused pulpal damage, indicating that shorter treatment times and lower power settings may be necessary if used in vivo.


Subject(s)
Body Temperature/radiation effects , Dental Pulp Cavity/radiation effects , Dentinal Fluid/radiation effects , Lasers , Aluminum Silicates , Analysis of Variance , Dental Pulp/injuries , Dental Pulp/radiation effects , Dental Pulp Cavity/physiology , Dental Pulp Cavity/ultrastructure , Dentin/physiology , Dentin/radiation effects , Dentin/ultrastructure , Dentin Permeability/radiation effects , Dentinal Fluid/metabolism , Holmium , Humans , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Molar, Third , Neodymium , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Tooth Crown/radiation effects , Yttrium
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...