Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 10.195
Filter
1.
Stress ; 27(1): 2353781, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823417

ABSTRACT

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis hyperactivity measured by the combined dexamethasone-CRH test (DEX-CRH test) has been found in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), whereas hypoactivity has been found in patients with work-related stress. We aimed to investigate the DEX-CRH test as a biomarker to distinguish between MDD and work-related stress (exhaustion disorder - ED). We hypothesized that there would be lower cortisol and ACTH response in participants with ED compared to MDD and healthy controls (HC). Also, we explored if the cortisol response of those patients interacted with robust markers of oxidative stress. Thirty inpatients with MDD and 23 outpatients with ED were recruited. Plasma cortisol and ACTH were sampled during a DEX-CRH test. The main outcome measure, area under the curve (AUC) for cortisol and ACTH, was compa-red between MDD vs. ED participants and a historical HC group. Secondary markers of oxidative stress urinary 8-oxodG and 8-oxoGuo; quality of sleep and psychometrics were obtained. Cortisol concentrations were higher in MDD and ED participants compared to HC, and no differences in AUC cortisol and ACTH were found between ED vs. MDD. Compared to ED, MDD participants had higher stress symptom severity and a lower sense of well-being. No differences in oxidative stress markers or quality of sleep between the groups were found. The result indicates that the patients with ED, like patients with MDD, are non-suppressors in DEX-CRH test and not hypocortisolemic as suggested.


Subject(s)
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone , Biomarkers , Depressive Disorder, Major , Dexamethasone , Hydrocortisone , Oxidative Stress , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/blood , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Female , Male , Hydrocortisone/blood , Adult , Oxidative Stress/physiology , Adrenocorticotropic Hormone/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone/blood , Occupational Stress/physiopathology , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/physiopathology , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/metabolism , Pituitary-Adrenal System/physiopathology
2.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301092, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718028

ABSTRACT

Globally, the rapid aging of the population is predicted to become even more severe in the second half of the 21st century. Thus, it is expected to establish a growing expectation for innovative, non-invasive health indicators and diagnostic methods to support disease prevention, care, and health promotion efforts. In this study, we aimed to establish a new health index and disease diagnosis method by analyzing the minerals and free amino acid components contained in hair shaft. We first evaluated the range of these components in healthy humans and then conducted a comparative analysis of these components in subjects with diabetes, hypertension, androgenetic alopecia, major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's disease, and stroke. In the statistical analysis, we first used a student's t test to compare the hair components of healthy people and those of patients with various diseases. However, many minerals and free amino acids showed significant differences in all diseases, because the sample size of the healthy group was very large compared to the sample size of the disease group. Therefore, we attempted a comparative analysis based on effect size, which is not affected by differences in sample size. As a result, we were able to narrow down the minerals and free amino acids for all diseases compared to t test analysis. For diabetes, the t test narrowed down the minerals to 15, whereas the effect size measurement narrowed it down to 3 (Cr, Mn, and Hg). For free amino acids, the t test narrowed it down to 15 minerals. By measuring the effect size, we were able to narrow it down to 7 (Gly, His, Lys, Pro, Ser, Thr, and Val). It is also possible to narrow down the minerals and free amino acids in other diseases, and to identify potential health indicators and disease-related components by using effect size.


Subject(s)
Amino Acids , Hair , Humans , Hair/chemistry , Male , Amino Acids/analysis , Amino Acids/metabolism , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Alopecia/diagnosis , Aged , Minerals/analysis , Minerals/metabolism , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , Stroke , Hypertension , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies
3.
Biosens Bioelectron ; 258: 116291, 2024 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735080

ABSTRACT

Depression is one of the most common mental disorders and is mainly characterized by low mood or lack of interest and pleasure. It can be accompanied by varying degrees of cognitive and behavioral changes and may lead to suicide risk in severe cases. Due to the subjectivity of diagnostic methods and the complexity of patients' conditions, the diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) has always been a difficult problem in psychiatry. With the discovery of more diagnostic biomarkers associated with MDD in recent years, especially emerging non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), it is possible to quantify the condition of patients with mental illness based on biomarker levels. Point-of-care biosensors have emerged due to their advantages of convenient sampling, rapid detection, miniaturization, and portability. After summarizing the pathogenesis of MDD, representative biomarkers, including proteins, hormones, and RNAs, are discussed. Furthermore, we analyzed recent advances in biosensors for detecting various types of biomarkers of MDD, highlighting representative electrochemical sensors. Future trends in terms of new biomarkers, new sample processing methods, and new detection modalities are expected to provide a complete reference for psychiatrists and biomedical engineers.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Biosensing Techniques , Depressive Disorder, Major , Biosensing Techniques/methods , Biosensing Techniques/instrumentation , Humans , Biomarkers/analysis , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Point-of-Care Systems , Electrochemical Techniques/methods
4.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 352, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730288

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To explore the demographic and clinical features of current depressive episode that discriminate patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) from those with bipolar I (BP-I) and bipolar II (BP-II) disorder who were misdiagnosed as having MDD . METHODS: The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) assessment was performed to establish DSM-IV diagnoses of MDD, and BP-I and BP-II, previously being misdiagnosed as MDD. Demographics, depressive symptoms and psychiatric comorbidities were compared between 1463 patients with BP-I, BP-II and MDD from 8 psychiatric settings in mainland China. A multinomial logistic regression model was performed to assess clinical correlates of diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 14.5% of the enrolled patients initially diagnosed with MDD were eventually diagnosed with BP. Broad illness characteristics including younger age, higher prevalence of recurrence, concurrent dysthymia, suicidal attempts, agitation, psychotic features and psychiatric comorbidities, as well as lower prevalence of insomnia, weight loss and somatic symptoms were featured by patients with BP-I and/or BP-I, compared to those with MDD. Comparisons between BP-I and BP-II versus MDD indicated distinct symptom profiles and comorbidity patterns with more differences being observed between BP-II and MDD, than between BP-I and MDD . CONCLUSION: The results provide evidence of clinically distinguishing characteristics between misdiagnosed BP-I and BP- II versus MDD. The findings have implications for guiding more accurate diagnoses of bipolar disorders.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major , Diagnostic Errors , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , China/epidemiology , Young Adult , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
5.
J Psychosom Res ; 182: 111691, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718690

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorders, and somatic symptom disorder (SSD) are associated with quality of life (QoL) reduction. This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between these conditions as categorical diagnoses and related psychopathologies with QoL, recognizing their frequent overlap. METHODS: We recruited a total of 403 clinical patients and healthy individuals, administering diagnostic interviews based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. QoL and psychopathologies were assessed using the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and several self-administered questionnaires, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses examined the associations between psychiatric diagnoses, psychopathologies, and QoL. RESULTS: SSD and MDD were independently associated with impaired global (ß = -0.318 and - 0.287) and all QoL domains (ß = -0.307, -0.150, -0.125, and - 0.133, in physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains respectively for SSD; ß = -0.278, -0.344, -0.275, and - 0.268 for MDD). The Beck Depression Inventory-II score showed pervasive associations with QoL (ß = -0.390, -0.408, -0.685, -0.463, and - 0.420, in global, physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains). The Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and Health Anxiety Questionnaire scores were associated with global (ß = -0.168 and - 0.181) and physical (ß = -0.293 and - 0.121) QoL domain, while the Cognitions About Body and Health Questionnaire score was only associated with environmental QoL domain (ß = -0.157). CONCLUSION: SSD and MDD were independently associated with QoL impairment. Depressive symptoms were associated with all QoL domains, whereas somatic symptom burden and health anxiety primarily affected the physical QoL domain. Clinicians should consider concomitant psychopathologies when managing patients with depression, anxiety, or somatic symptoms.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders , Depressive Disorder, Major , Medically Unexplained Symptoms , Quality of Life , Somatoform Disorders , Humans , Quality of Life/psychology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
6.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(5): e147-e156, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748915

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is linked to a 61% increased risk of emergency department (ED) visits and frequent ED usage. Collaborative care management (CoCM) models target MDD treatment in primary care, but how best to prioritize patients for CoCM to prevent frequent ED utilization remains unclear. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk identification model to proactively detect patients with MDD in CoCM at high risk of frequent (≥ 3) ED visits. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic health records from Mayo Clinic's primary care system to develop and validate a machine learning-based risk identification model. The model predicts the likelihood of frequent ED visits among patients with MDD within a 12-month period. METHODS: Data were collected from Mayo Clinic's primary care system between May 1, 2006, and December 19, 2018. Risk identification models were developed and validated using machine learning classifiers to estimate frequent ED visit risks over 12 months. The Shapley Additive Explanations model identified variables driving frequent ED visits. RESULTS: The patient population had a mean (SD) age of 39.78 (16.66) years, with 30.3% being male and 6.1% experiencing frequent ED visits. The best-performing algorithm (elastic-net logistic regression) achieved an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.84), a sensitivity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82), and a specificity of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85) in the development data set. In the validation data set, the best-performing algorithm (random forest) achieved an area under the curve of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.83, and a specificity of 0.61. Significant variables included male gender, prior frequent ED visits, high Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score, low education level, unemployment, and use of multiple medications. CONCLUSIONS: The risk identification model has potential for clinical application in triaging primary care patients with MDD in CoCM, aiming to reduce future ED utilization.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Emergency Service, Hospital , Machine Learning , Humans , Male , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Risk Assessment , Middle Aged , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care
7.
Trials ; 25(1): 320, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750599

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Comorbid anxiety disorders and anxious distress are highly prevalent among individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD). The presence of the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier (ADS) has been associated with worse treatment outcomes and chronic disease course. Few studies have evaluated the therapeutic effects of High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on depressive and anxiety symptoms among MDD patients with ADS. The current randomized controlled trial aims to assess the efficacy of HD-tDCS as an augmentation therapy with antidepressants compared to sham-control in subjects of MDD with ADS. METHODS: MDD patients with ADS will be recruited and randomly assigned to the active HD-tDCS or sham HD-tDCS group. In both groups, patients will receive the active or sham intervention in addition to their pre-existing antidepressant therapy, for 2 weeks with 5 sessions per week, each lasting 30 min. The primary outcome measures will be the change of depressive symptoms, clinical response, and the remission rate as measured with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) before and after the intervention and at the 2nd and 6th week after the completed intervention. Secondary outcome measures include anxiety symptoms, cognitive symptoms, disability assessment, and adverse effects. DISCUSSION: The HD-tDCS applied in this trial may have treatment effects on MDD with ADS and have minimal side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial protocol is registered with www.chictr.org.cn under protocol registration number ChiCTR2300071726. Registered 23 May 2023.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Double-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Young Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Adolescent
8.
Psychosom Med ; 86(3): 202-209, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588496

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe psychiatric symptom worldwide, and the coexistence of MDD with metabolic syndrome (MetS) is common in clinical practice. However, gender differences in comorbid MetS in first-episode and drug-naïve (FEDN) MDD patients have not been reported. Here, we explored potential gender differences in the prevalence and clinical correlates of comorbid MetS in FEDN MDD patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 1718 FEDN MDD patients was conducted. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Scale, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale positive subscale were used to evaluate depression, anxiety, and psychotic symptoms, respectively. RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was 1.645-fold higher in female MDD patients (38.50%) than in male patients (26.53%). Patients with MetS had higher HAMD score, Hamilton Anxiety Scale score, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale positive subscale score than patients without MetS (p values < .001). Furthermore, suicide attempts (male: odds ratio [OR] = 1.706, p = .034; female: OR = 1.639, p = .004) and HAMD score (male: OR = 1.251, p < .001; female: OR = 1.148, p < .001) were independently associated with MetS in male and female patients, whereas age of onset was independently associated with MetS only in female patients (OR = 1.744, p = .047). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest significant gender differences in the prevalence and clinical correlates of comorbid MetS in FEDN MDD patients. Clinical variables (suicide attempts and HAMD scores) may be independently associated with MetS in MDD patients.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Metabolic Syndrome , Humans , Male , Female , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sex Factors
9.
Brain Behav ; 14(4): e3494, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The difficulty is remained to accurately distinguish bipolar disorder (BD) from major depressive disorder (MDD) in early stage, with a delayed diagnosis for 5-10 years. BD patients are often treated with antidepressants systematically due to being diagnosed with MDD, affecting the disease course and clinical outcomes. The current study aims to explore the role of plasma exosomes as biomarker to distinguish BD from MDD in early stage. METHODS: Two stages are included. The first stage is a cross-sectional study, comparing the concentrations of plasma exosome microRNA and related proteins among BD group, MDD group, and healthy controls (HC) group (n = 40 respectively), to identify target biomarkers preliminarily. The "Latent Class Analysis" and "Receiver Operating Characteristic" analysis will be performed to determine the optimal concentration range for each biomarker. The second stage is to validate target markers in subjects, coming from an ongoing study focusing on patients with a first depressive episode. All target biomarkers will be test in plasma samples reserved at the initial stage to detect whether the diagnosis indicated by biomarker level is consistent with the diagnosis by DSM-5. Furthermore, the correlation between specific biomarkers and the manic episode, suicidal ideation, and adverse reactions will also be observed. DISCUSSION: Exosome-derived microRNA and related proteins have potential in serving as a good medium for exploring mental disorders because it can pass through the blood-brain barrier bidirectionally and convey a large amount of information stably. Improving the early diagnosis of BD would help implement appropriate intervention strategy as early as possible and significantly reduce the burden of disease.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Depressive Disorder, Major , Exosomes , MicroRNAs , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Biomarkers
10.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 285, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inflammation has become a critical pathological mechanism of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). NLRP3 is a critical inflammatory pathway to maintain the immune balance. Recently, preclinical evidence showed that Resolvin D1 might potentially offer a new option for antidepressant treatment due to its protective effects through the inhibition of neuroinflammation. However, whether they have clinical value in the diagnosis and treatment evaluation of adolescent depression was unclear. METHODS: Forty-eight untreated first-episode adolescent patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder, as well as 30 healthy adolescents (HCs, age and gender-matched), were enrolled for this study. Their ages ranged from 13 to 18 (15.75 ± 1.36) years. The patients were treated with fluoxetine for 6-8 weeks. HDRS-17 was used to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms. Venous blood samples were collected at baseline for the two groups and at the time-point of post-antidepressant treatment for the patients. Serum concentrations of RvD1, NLRP3, IL-1ß, IL-18, and IL-4 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) pre- and post-fluoxetine treatment. RESULTS: Serum levels of RvD1 and anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-4 were significantly elevated in adolescents with MDD compared to healthy adolescents, but no significant difference in NLRP3, IL-1ß, and IL-18 between the two groups. Meanwhile, RvD1 (positively) and IL-4 (negatively) were correlated with the severity of symptoms (HDRS-17 scores) after adjusting age, gender, and BMI. Interestingly, fluoxetine treatment significantly reduced the serum levels of RvD1, NLRP3, IL-1ß, and IL-18 in MDD adolescents but increased the levels of IL-4 relative to baseline. Furthermore, we observed that serum levels of RvD1 might be an excellent distinguishing indicator for depression and healthy adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to compare RvD1 and NLRP3 between adolescent MDD and HCs. Our findings of reactive increase of RvD1 in adolescent MDD comprised a novel and critical contribution. Our results showed the presence of inflammation resolution unbalanced in adolescents with MDD and indicated that RvD1 might be an ideal biomarker for diagnosing and treating adolescent MDD.


Subject(s)
Cytokines , Depressive Disorder, Major , Docosahexaenoic Acids , Adolescent , Humans , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Inflammation/drug therapy , Interleukin-18 , Interleukin-4 , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein
11.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 344, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627748

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is a growing problem with increasing burden in global aging. Older adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) have higher risk of dementia. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) has been proven as a potential biomarker in neurodegenerative disease, including dementia. We aimed to investigate the association between cognitive deficits and NfL levels in older adults with MDD. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 39 MDD patients and 15 individuals with mild neurocognitive disorder or major neurocognitive disorder, Alzheimer's type, as controls, from a tertiary psychiatric hospital. Both groups were over age 65 and with matched Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. Demographic data, clinical variables, and plasma NfL levels were obtained. We used cluster analysis according to their cognitive profile and estimated the correlation between plasma NfL levels and each cognitive domain. RESULTS: In the MDD group, participants had higher rate of family psychiatry history and current alcohol use habit compared with controls. Control group of neurocognitive disorders showed significantly lower score in total MMSE and higher plasma NfL levels. Part of the MDD patients presented cognitive deficits clustered with that of neurocognitive disorders (cluster A). In cluster A, the total MMSE score (r=-0.58277, p=0.0287) and the comprehension domain (r=-0.71717, p=0.0039) were negatively correlated to NfL levels after adjusting for age, while the associations had not been observed in the other cluster. CONCLUSIONS: We noted the negative correlation between NfL levels and cognition in MDD patients clustered with neurodegenerative disorder, Alzheimer's type. NfL could be a promising candidate as a biomarker to predict subtype of patients in MDD to develop cognitive decline. Further longitudinal studies and within MDD cluster analysis are required to validate our findings for clinical implications.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Dementia , Depressive Disorder, Major , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Aged , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Amyloid beta-Peptides , Biomarkers , Cognition , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dementia/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Intermediate Filaments , Cluster Analysis
12.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 282, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627754

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the commonest mental disorders affecting more than 250 million people globally. Patients with chronic illnesses had higher risks for developing MDD than the general population. Neurolathyrism is a chronic illness characterized by lifelong incurable spastic paralysis of lower extremities; causing permanent disability. It is highly prevalent in Dawunt district, Ethiopia; with a point prevalence of 2.4%. Despite this, there were no previous studies assessing the prevalence of MDD among patients with neurolathyrism in Ethiopia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of MDD and to identify its associated factors among patients with neurolathyrism in Dawunt district, Ethiopia. METHODS: A community based cross-sectional study was conducted on 260 samples in Dawunt district from February 01 to March 30/ 2021. Multistage sampling technique was used to select study participants. The patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screening tool was used to diagnose MDD. PHQ-9 is a standardized depression screening tool and a PHQ-9 score of ≥ 10 has a sensitivity and specificity of 88.0% [95% CI (83.0-92.0%)] and 85.0% [95% CI (82.0-88.0%)] for screening MDD. Data were collected by interview; entered to EpiData version 4.2.0; exported to SPSS version 25.0 for analysis; descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression model were used; AOR with 95% CI was used to interpret the associations; and finally results were presented by texts, charts, graphs, and tables. RESULTS: A total of 256 adult patients with neurolathyrism were participated; and the prevalence of MDD was found to be 38.7%. Being female [AOR = 3.00; 95% CI (1.15, 7.84)], living alone [AOR = 2.77; 95% CI (1.02-7.53)], being on neurolathyrism stage-3 [AOR = 3.22; 95% CI (1.09, 9.54)] or stage-4 [AOR = 4.00; 95% CI (1.28, 12.48)], stigma [AOR = 2.69; 95% CI (1.34, 5.39)], and lack of social/ family support [AOR = 3.61; 95% CI (1.80, 7.24)] were found to have statistically significant association with an increased odds of MDD; while regular exercise and ever formal counselling were found to have statistically significant association with a decreased odds of MDD. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MDD among neurolathyrism patients in Dawunt district was high. Lack of social support, stigma, not getting formal counselling, and not involving in regular exercise were modifiable risk factors. Therefore, social support, reducing stigma, formal counselling, and encouraging regular exercise might help to reduce the burden of MDD among neurolathyrism patients.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Lathyrism , Adult , Humans , Female , Male , Prevalence , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia/epidemiology
13.
Trials ; 25(1): 247, 2024 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594753

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is essential for antidepressant treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Our repeated studies suggest that DNA methylation of a specific CpG site in the promoter region of exon IV of the BDNF gene (CpG -87) might be predictive of the efficacy of monoaminergic antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and others. This trial aims to evaluate whether knowing the biomarker is non-inferior to treatment-as-usual (TAU) regarding remission rates while exhibiting significantly fewer adverse events (AE). METHODS: The BDNF trial is a prospective, randomized, rater-blinded diagnostic study conducted at five university hospitals in Germany. The study's main hypothesis is that {1} knowing the methylation status of CpG -87 is non-inferior to not knowing it with respect to the remission rate while it significantly reduces the AE rate in patients experiencing at least one AE. The baseline assessment will occur upon hospitalization and a follow-up assessment on day 49 (± 3). A telephone follow-up will be conducted on day 70 (± 3). A total of 256 patients will be recruited, and methylation will be evaluated in all participants. They will be randomly assigned to either the marker or the TAU group. In the marker group, the methylation results will be shared with both the patient and their treating physician. In the TAU group, neither the patients nor their treating physicians will receive the marker status. The primary endpoints include the rate of patients achieving remission on day 49 (± 3), defined as a score of ≤ 10 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24), and the occurrence of AE. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol has received approval from the Institutional Review Boards at the five participating universities. This trial holds significance in generating valuable data on a predictive biomarker for antidepressant treatment in patients with MDD. The findings will be shared with study participants, disseminated through professional society meetings, and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00032503. Registered on 17 August 2023.


Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor , Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/genetics , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Prospective Studies , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Methylation , Biomarkers
14.
JAAPA ; 37(5): 15-21, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595130

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Major depressive disorder (MDD) remains a significant risk to adolescent health and well-being, recently amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. Access to adolescent mental health care services remains challenging in many areas, resulting in many adolescents diagnosed with MDD remaining untreated. Primary care providers are becoming increasingly crucial in promptly diagnosing and treating this concern. Various clinical guidelines can support clinicians in developing strategies for screening, diagnosing, and managing a vulnerable population with MDD. Standardized screenings, algorithms, and treatment guidelines can help improve the quality of life and functional impairment of those with MDD.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Depressive Disorder, Major , Primary Health Care , Humans , Adolescent , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Mental Health Services , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Pandemics , Female , Male
15.
J Affect Disord ; 355: 254-264, 2024 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) is commonly based on the subjective evaluation by experienced psychiatrists using clinical scales. Hence, it is particularly important to find more objective biomarkers to aid in diagnosis and further treatment. Alpha-band activity (7-13 Hz) is the most prominent component in resting electroencephalogram (EEG), which is also thought to be a potential biomarker. Recent studies have shown the existence of multiple sub-oscillations within the alpha band, with distinct neural underpinnings. However, the specific contribution of these alpha sub-oscillations to the diagnosis and treatment of MDD remains unclear. METHODS: In this study, we recorded the resting-state EEG from MDD and HC populations in both open and closed-eye state conditions. We also assessed cognitive processing using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). RESULTS: We found that the MDD group showed significantly higher power in the high alpha range (10.5-11.5 Hz) and lower power in the low alpha range (7-8.5 Hz) compared to the HC group. Notably, high alpha power in the MDD group is negatively correlated with working memory performance in MCCB, whereas no such correlation was found in the HC group. Furthermore, using five established classification algorithms, we discovered that combining alpha oscillations with MCCB scores as features yielded the highest classification accuracy compared to using EEG or MCCB scores alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the potential of sub-oscillations within the alpha frequency band as a potential distinct biomarker. When combined with psychological scales, they may provide guidance relevant for the diagnosis and treatment of MDD.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Consensus , Electroencephalography , Cognition , Biomarkers
16.
Neuroimage ; 292: 120594, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569980

ABSTRACT

Converging evidence increasingly suggests that psychiatric disorders, such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), are not unitary diseases, but rather heterogeneous syndromes that involve diverse, co-occurring symptoms and divergent responses to treatment. This clinical heterogeneity has hindered the progress of precision diagnosis and treatment effectiveness in psychiatric disorders. In this study, we propose BPI-GNN, a new interpretable graph neural network (GNN) framework for analyzing functional magnetic resonance images (fMRI), by leveraging the famed prototype learning. In addition, we introduce a novel generation process of prototype subgraph to discover essential edges of distinct prototypes and employ total correlation (TC) to ensure the independence of distinct prototype subgraph patterns. BPI-GNN can effectively discriminate psychiatric patients and healthy controls (HC), and identify biological meaningful subtypes of psychiatric disorders. We evaluate the performance of BPI-GNN against 11 popular brain network classification methods on three psychiatric datasets and observe that our BPI-GNN always achieves the highest diagnosis accuracy. More importantly, we examine differences in clinical symptom profiles and gene expression profiles among identified subtypes and observe that our identified brain-based subtypes have the clinical relevance. It also discovers the subtype biomarkers that align with current neuro-scientific knowledge.


Subject(s)
Brain , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neural Networks, Computer , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Mental Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Mental Disorders/classification , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Female , Male , Nerve Net/diagnostic imaging , Nerve Net/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnostic imaging , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/classification , Young Adult , Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnostic imaging , Autism Spectrum Disorder/physiopathology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis
17.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 53(1): 17-25, 2024.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the psychiatric diagnoses and treatments of patients admitted to the high-risk obstetric service who underwent a consultation with a liaison psychiatrist. METHODS: A descriptive observational study that included pregnant women from the high-risk obstetric service of a highly specialised clinic in Medellín, who had a liaison psychiatry consultation between 2013 and 2017. The main variables of interest were psychiatric and obstetric diagnoses and treatments, in addition to biopsychosocial risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 361 medical records were screened, with 248 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The main prevailing psychiatric diagnosis was major depressive disorder (29%), followed by adaptive disorder (21.8%) and anxiety disorders (12.5%). The pharmacologic treatments most used by the psychiatry service were SSRI antidepressants (24.2%), trazodone (6.8%) and benzodiazepines (5.2%). The most common primary obstetric diagnosis was spontaneous delivery (46.4%), and the predominant secondary obstetric diagnoses were hypertensive disorder associated with pregnancy (10.4%), gestational diabetes (9.2%) and recurrent abortions (6.4%). Overall, 71.8% of the patients had a high biopsychosocial risk. CONCLUSIONS: The studied population's primary psychiatric disorders were major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder and anxiety disorders, which implies the importance of timely recognition of the symptoms of these perinatal mental pathologies, together with obstetric and social risks, in the prenatal consultation. Psychiatric intervention should be encouraged considering the negative implications of high biopsychosocial risk in both mothers and children.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Pregnancy Complications , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Colombia/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Young Adult , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adjustment Disorders/epidemiology , Adjustment Disorders/diagnosis , Pregnancy, High-Risk
18.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 331, 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To examine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A) in Chinese children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: A total of 248 MDD patients aged between 12 and 18 years were recruited and evaluated by the Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A), the Center for Epidemiological Survey Depression Scale (CES-D), the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ), and the improved Clinical Global Impression Scale, Severity item (iCGI-S). Thirty-one patients were selected randomly to complete the PHQ-A again one week later. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the construct validity of the scale. Reliability was evaluated by Macdonald Omega coefficient. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the item-total correlation and the correlation of PHQ-A with CES-D and MFQ respectively. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess test-retest reliability. The optimal cut-off value, sensitivity, and specificity of the PHQ-A were achieved by estimating the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: CFA reported adequate loadings for all items, except for item 3. Macdonald Omega coefficient of the PHQ-A was 0.87. The Spearman correlation coefficient of the test-retest reliability was 0.70. The Pearson correlation coefficients of the PHQ-A with CES-D and MFQ were 0.87 and 0.85, respectively (p < 0.01). By taking the iCGI-S as the remission criteria for MDD, the optimal cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity of the PHQ-A were 7, 98.7%, 94.7% respectively. CONCLUSION: The PHQ-A presented as a unidimensional construct and demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity among the Chinese children and adolescents with MDD. A cut-off value of 7 was suggested for remission.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Psychometrics , Humans , Adolescent , Male , Female , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Child , China , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Patient Health Questionnaire , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Asian People/psychology , East Asian People
19.
Br J Psychiatry ; 224(5): 157-163, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584324

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: International guidelines present overall symptom severity as the key dimension for clinical characterisation of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, differences may reside within severity levels related to how symptoms interact in an individual patient, called symptom dynamics. AIMS: To investigate these individual differences by estimating the proportion of patients that display differences in their symptom dynamics while sharing the same overall symptom severity. METHOD: Participants with MDD (n = 73; mean age 34.6 years, s.d. = 13.1; 56.2% female) rated their baseline symptom severity using the Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR). Momentary indicators for depressive symptoms were then collected through ecological momentary assessments five times per day for 28 days; 8395 observations were conducted (average per person: 115; s.d. = 16.8). Each participant's symptom dynamics were estimated using person-specific dynamic network models. Individual differences in these symptom relationship patterns in groups of participants sharing the same symptom severity levels were estimated using individual network invariance tests. Subsequently, the overall proportion of participants that displayed differential symptom dynamics while sharing the same symptom severity was calculated. A supplementary simulation study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of our methodology against false-positive results. RESULTS: Differential symptom dynamics were identified across 63.0% (95% bootstrapped CI 41.0-82.1) of participants within the same severity group. The average false detection of individual differences was 2.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants within the same depressive symptom severity group displayed differential symptom dynamics. Examining symptom dynamics provides information about person-specific psychopathological expression beyond severity levels by revealing how symptoms aggravate each other over time. These results suggest that symptom dynamics may be a promising new dimension for clinical characterisation, warranting replication in independent samples. To inform personalised treatment planning, a next step concerns linking different symptom relationship patterns to treatment response and clinical course, including patterns related to spontaneous recovery and forms of disorder progression.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Female , Adult , Male , Middle Aged , Ecological Momentary Assessment , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Self Report , Individuality , Young Adult
20.
J Affect Disord ; 356: 64-70, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38565338

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Efforts to reduce the heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) by identifying subtypes have not yet facilitated treatment personalization or investigation of biology, so novel approaches merit consideration. METHODS: We utilized electronic health records drawn from 2 academic medical centers and affiliated health systems in Massachusetts to identify data-driven subtypes of MDD, characterizing sociodemographic features, comorbid diagnoses, and treatment patterns. We applied Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to summarize diagnostic codes followed by agglomerative clustering to define patient subgroups. RESULTS: Among 136,371 patients (95,034 women [70 %]; 41,337 men [30 %]; mean [SD] age, 47.0 [14.0] years), the 15 putative MDD subtypes were characterized by comorbidities and distinct patterns in medication use. There was substantial variation in rates of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use (from a low of 62 % to a high of 78 %) and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use (from 4 % to 21 %). LIMITATIONS: Electronic health records lack reliable symptom-level data, so we cannot examine the extent to which subtypes might differ in clinical presentation or symptom dimensions. CONCLUSION: These data-driven subtypes, drawing on representative clinical cohorts, merit further investigation for their utility in identifying more homogeneous patient populations for basic as well as clinical investigation.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Electronic Health Records , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/classification , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Female , Male , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adult , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...